Five-Year Review of the Mauritius Strategy for the Further

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Five-Year Review of the Mauritius Strategy for the Further CSD18/2010/BP10 UNITED NATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS Commission on Sustainable Development Eighteenth Session 3-14 May 2010 Five-Year Review of the Mauritius Strategy for the Further Implementation of the Barbados Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States: Pacific High-level Dialogue PORT VILA OUTCOME STATEMENT Prepared by ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC AND THE DEPARTMENT FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS 8 - 9 February 2010 Port Vila, Vanuatu Background Paper CSD18/2010/BP10 1 CSD18/2010/BP10 I. INTRODUCTION 1. The Mauritius Strategy for the Further Implementation of the Barbados Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States (MSI) was approved in 2005 as the global strategy for addressing the vulnerabilities of small island developing states (SIDS). In 2009, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) decided through Resolution 62/191 to review the progress made in implementing the MSI at its sixty-fifth session, to be held in September 2010. Resolution 63/213 further stressed that the MSI review should provide the international community with an opportunity to: (a) conduct an assessment of the progress made, lessons learned and constraints encountered in the implementation of the MSI; and (b) agree on what needs to be done to further address the vulnerabilities of small islands developing states (SIDS). 2. In pursuance of the above resolutions, the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) assisted the Pacific SIDS to prepare their national assessment reports (NARs) and drafted a Pacific Regional Report (the draft report). Furthermore, UNESCAP, with financial assistance of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) and the collaboration of members of the Council of Regional Organizations of the Pacific (CROP), organized the Pacific High- level Dialogue (Meeting) on the MSI in Port Vila on 8 and 9 February 2010, hosted by the Government of Vanuatu. The Meeting provided Pacific SIDS with the opportunity to exchange views on national progress towards implementing the MSI and give feedback on the content of the draft report. 3. The meeting was attended by Ministers of Finance/National Planning and Senior Officials from the Pacific SIDS and representatives of international and regional organizations. The Prime Minister of Vanuatu and the Executive Secretary of UNESCAP opened the meeting and the President of Kiribati provided closing remarks. The meeting was divided into sessions during which UNESCAP presented a section of the draft report as the basis for discussion. Ministers provided formal responses on the content and then the floor was opened to other participants for comments and views. Sessions were moderated by the Chief Executive Officers and senior officials of regional organizations. II CONSTRAINTS, PROGRESS AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE PACIFIC 4. Participants discussed the challenges faced by Pacific SIDS, such as isolation, small area and population sizes, lack of resources, the high frequency of natural disasters and vulnerability to rising sea-levels. These challenges have been compounded by the recent fuel, food and financial crises, the effects of which are being transmitted to the Pacific through various channels. This has emphasized the vulnerabilities of Pacific SIDS, with the ultimate impact being lower economic growth, worsening economic outlook, falling government revenues and increasing poverty. 5. Participants concluded that the vulnerabilities of the Pacific SIDS continued to exist while the ability to cope with them has decreased. The area where international and 2 CSD18/2010/BP10 regional cooperation has become most urgent is climate change. The adverse impact of climate change threatens to offset development gains for a number of SIDS and in several cases their actual physical existence and survival. SIDS are on the frontline of climate change and many have diverted scarce resources meant for socio-economic development to adaptation and mitigation programs. 6. Despite the challenges, much had been done in the Pacific to progress towards implementation of the MSI. The draft report identified over thirty regional initiatives implemented over the past five years and it noted successes in conservation (i.e. the Micronesian Challenge), energy (e.g. the bulk purchasing of fuel, production of renewable energy and setting of national targets to reduce reliance on fossil fuels), subregional shipping, aviation reforms, and tourism. The opening up of labor markets in neighboring areas, including on foreign ships, was also noted as a positive development, as were the achievements of some countries in maintaining political and macro-economic stability. 7. Participants also noted some progress in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), although none of the Pacific SIDS are on track to meet all the goals by 2015. Some countries were able to maintain positive economic growth during the global economic crisis, even if it was lower than in previous years or in comparison with Asia and other regions. 8. Discussions highlighted that the Pacific Ocean, although often seen as an isolating factor and a barrier to development, is an “Ocean of Opportunity” that must be managed for the benefit the Pacific islands and the world. Pacific ecosystems are highly diverse and have sustained the lives of Pacific communities since first settlement. They comprise the most extensive coral reefs in the world, unique landforms, globally important fisheries, significant land and seabed mineral resources, and high numbers of endemic species. The Pacific is host to the only large-scale tuna stocks remaining in the world. The region may also contain resources of potential use to humankind that are yet to be discovered. To safeguard Pacific communities and maintain the health of their ecosystems in perpetuity, the meeting noted a precautionary or “low-regrets” approach must be applied to the development process, as outlined in Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration. Strengthening the resilience of ecosystems will be integral to achieving development goals. In their discussions, the Ministers and officials highlighted a number of critical vulnerabilities in the Pacific which include: III. ADDRESSING THE VULNERABILITIES OF PACIFIC S.I.D.S: IMPLEMENTATION 9. In their discussions, the Ministers and officials highlighted a number of critical vulnerabilities in the Pacific which include: 3 CSD18/2010/BP10 a) Climate change remains the greatest challenge as current and predicted impacts serve to undermine progress towards development and, for some of the Pacific SIDS, threaten their very existence. Recognizing that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) remains the mechanism for negotiating action on this issue, the meeting noted the need for: o Urgently reaching agreement on and implementation of meaningful and legally binding commitments following the less than desirable outcomes of the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen; o Supporting the provisions in the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) Climate Change Declaration of September 2009, including immediate adoption of a package of mitigation activities up to and beyond 20121; o Providing SIDS with new, additional, predictable, transparent and adequate sources of grant-based financing to fully meet the adaptation needs of these particularly vulnerable countries, and ensure for SIDS that access is timely, direct, prioritized and simplified; and o Developing adaptation funding modalities, including cost-effective solutions to protect the natural environment, designed specifically for Pacific SIDS. b) Energy - fossil fuel dependency has a crippling effect on national budgets and revenues and impacts on key productive sectors in the region such as fisheries, agriculture and tourism. Support is needed from the international community for: o Immediate diversification in energy options, with a focus on renewable energy; o A move to appropriate technology in key productive sectors; and o Coordinated support from donors with respect to appropriate technology transfer. c) Natural and environmental disasters - the ‘knock out’ effect of natural disasters on economies and the limited ability to recover has been experienced by a number of Pacific SIDS over the last five years. Support from the international community is needed for: o The establishment of vastly improved early warning systems at regional and national levels; o Improved affordable insurance mechanisms; and o Improved post disaster support with financing and reconstruction. 1 This provides for: i. long-term stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations at well below 350ppm CO2-equivalent levels; ii. global average surface temperature increases to be limited to well below 1.5° C above pre- industrial levels; iii. global greenhouse gas emissions to peak by 2015 and decline thereafter; iv. reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions by more than 85% below 1990 levels by 2050 v. Annex I parties to the UNFCCC to reduce their collective GHG emissions by more than 45% below 1990 levels by 2020, and more than 95% below 1990 levels by 2050, given their historical responsibility; vi. a significant deviation from business as usual by developing countries through measurable, reportable and verifiable nationally appropriate mitigation actions in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled by technology, financing
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Study (Focusing on Fiji, Tonga and Vanuatu
    1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Hazard exposure 1.1. Pacific island countries (PICs) are vulnerable to a broad range of natural disasters stemming from hydro-meteorological (such as cyclones, droughts, landslide and floods) and geo-physical hazards (volcanic eruptions, earthquakes and tsunamis). In any given year, it is likely that Fiji, Tonga and Vanuatu are either hit by, or recovering from, a major natural disaster. 1.2. The impact of natural disasters is estimated by the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment and Financing Initiative as equivalent to an annualized loss of 6.6% of GDP in Vanuatu, and 4.3% in Tonga. For Fiji, the average asset losses due to tropical cyclones and floods are estimated at more than 5%. 1.3. In 2014, Tropical Cyclone (TC) Ian caused damage equivalent to 11% to Tonga's GDP. It was followed in 2018 by damage close to 38% of GDP from TC Gita. In 2015, category five TC Pam displaced 25% of Vanuatu's population and provoked damage estimated at 64% of GDP. In Fiji, Tropical Cyclone Winston affected 62% of the population and wrought damage amounting to 31% of GDP, only some three and a half years after the passage of Tropical Cyclone Evan. 1.4. Vanuatu and Tonga rank number one and two in global indices of natural disaster risk. Seismic hazard is an ever-present danger for both, together with secondary risks arising from tsunamis and landslides. Some 240 earthquakes, ranging in magnitude between 3.3 and 7.1 on the Richter Scale, struck Vanuatu and its surrounding region in the first ten months of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • HRC 41 (24 June– 12 July 2019)
    FACTS and FIGURES HRC 41 (24 June– 12 July 2019) Beneficiary delegates of the LDCs/SIDS Trust Fund, Room XX, Palais des Nations, 21 June 2019, Geneva; © OHCHR/Danielle Kirby BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE 15 LDCs/SIDS BENEFICIARY DELEGATES AT HRC 41 First time participation in a regular session of the Human Rights Council: 15 GENDER • 12 women • 3 men REGIONS Africa: 6 Comoros Djibouti Gambia Madagascar Rwanda Somalia Asia and the Pacific: 7 Fiji Kiribati Nauru Nepal Palau Papua New Guinea Vanuatu Latin America and the Caribbean: 2 Bahamas Dominica As of 12 July 2019 Facts and Figures LDC/SIDS Trust Fund HRC41 Page 2 of 8 LDCs/SIDS Total number of SIDS: 9 Bahamas, Comoros, Dominica, Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu) Total number of LDCs: 6 Djibouti ,Gambia, Madagascar, Nepal, Rwanda, Somalia Delegates coming from countries without a Permanent Mission in Geneva 1. Latin America and the Caribbean: Dominica 2. Asia and the Pacific: Kiribati, Palau, Papua New Guinea Where do Beneficiary Delegates work ? Ministry Beneficiary Number Number of Total Without a countries of women men PM in at HRC 41 Geneva Foreign Affairs Madagascar 5 1 6 1 Capital Fiji Djibouti Nauru Nepal Papua New Guinea Foreign Affairs Bahamas 1 - 1 - Permanent Mission In New York Justice Comoros 3 1 4 1 Kiribati Gambia Rwanda Gender Dominica 1 1 1 1 Somalia 1 Executive Palau (Ministry 2 - 2 2 Offices of State) Vanuatu (State Law Office) TOTAL 12 3 15 4 As of 12 July 2019 Facts and Figures LDC/SIDS Trust Fund HRC41 Page 3 of 8 Delegates coming from: Capital: 14 Permanent Mission in New York: 1 (one) Biographies of the LDCs/SIDS delegates supported by the Trust Fund at HRC41 Link: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/LDCs_SIDS/BeneficiaryDelegatesHRC41.
    [Show full text]
  • Vanuatu Key Indicators for Vanuatu (2017) World Pacific Fixed-Telephone Sub
    Asia & Vanuatu Key indicators for Vanuatu (2017) World Pacific Fixed-telephone sub. per 100 inhab. 1�3 9�5 13�0 The South Pacific nation has made significant Mobile-cellular sub. per 100 inhab. 82�5 104�0 103�6 progress in developing its ICT sector in recent Active mobile-broadband sub. per 100 inhab. 45�4 60�3 61�9 years with strong growth in data traffic 3G coverage (% of population) 98�0 91�3 87�9 following the deployment of its first undersea LTE/WiMAX coverage (% of population) 33�0 86�9 76�3 cable link in 2014 and the launch of LTE in 2016. Individuals using the Internet (%) 25.7 44�3 48�6 Households with a computer (%) 22.4 38�9 47�1 Mobile services: There are two operators: the Households with Internet access (%) 29.4 49�0 54�7 incumbent Telecom Vanuatu Limited (TVL), which International bandwidth per Internet user (kbit/s) 12.2 61�7 76�6 began offering GSM mobile services in 2002, Fixed-broadband sub. per 100 inhab. 2�1 13�0 13�6 and Digicel (Vanuatu) Limited. Digicel entered as Fixed-broadband sub. by speed tiers, % distribution the second operator when it launched its GSM -256 kbit/s to 2 Mbit/s 51.4 2�4 4�2 network in June 2008. The introduction of cellular -2 to 10 Mbit/s 26.8 7�6 13�2 competition rapidly increased coverage and uptake -equal to or above 10 Mbit/s 21.8 90�0 82�6 with 80 per cent of households having a mobile phone (97 per cent of urban households compared to Note: Data in italics are ITU estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Members of the Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal
    Current members of the Commonwealth Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal Mr Arthur Faerua (Vanuatu), member, 1 June 2012 - 31/5/2016; 1/6/2016 Education 2010, University of South Pacific, Emalus Campus, Vanuatu Vanuatu mediation Practise Course • Skills in Conducting Mediation and Dispute Resolution • Certified by Supreme Court Vanuatu as an accredited Mediator 2004, University of South Pacific, Emalus Campus, Vanuatu Graduate Certificate in Tertiary Teaching (GCTT) • Skills in Delivery and Learning in a tertiary environment • Student-Oriented Learning for Pacific students 1997 – 1998, University of Waikato, New Zealand Masters of Law (LLM) • International Trade Law • Focus on Pacific Constitutions and economic development September - December 1996, University of Waikato, New Zealand Professional Legal Studies Admission as Barrister & Solicitor in the High Court of New Zealand 1992-1995, University of Waikato, New Zealand Bachelor of Laws (LLB) International Trade & Commercial Law Short-Term Trainings & Instructionals November 2008, Commodities Branch, Division on International Trade in Good and Services & Commodities, UNCTAD & Vanuatu National Codex Committee 1 National Capacity Building Workshop on Commodities- related Trade and Development, Poverty Reduction, Food Safety Standards and Quality Requirements, and Food Laws and Technical Regulations Trade & Food Safety Standards March 2005, WHO/FAO Training Course on the Management of Codex Contact Point and the National Codex System Capacity Building in Codex, Food Regulation and International
    [Show full text]
  • Plastic Waste Free Islands
    Key updates from 2020 PLASTIC WASTE FREE ISLANDS 2020 OVERVIEW About the project Jan-Feb 2020 In 2019, with support from the Norwegian Agency for Launch in the Development Cooperation (Norad), IUCN launched Caribbean & Oceania the Plastic Waste Free Islands (PWFI) project, as part of its global Close the Plastic Tap Programme. Implemented in Fiji, Vanuatu and Samoa in Oceania February 2020 and Antigua and Barbuda, Saint Lucia and Grenada in the Caribbean, the project seeks to promote island National plastics quantification circular economy and to demonstrate effective, and material flow analysis quantifiable solutions to addressing plastic leakage from Small Island Developing States (SIDS). June 2020 Key stakeholders from governments, private sector and civil society, united in a vibrant learning and Promotional video launch leadership network, will co-generate and demonstrate demand-responsive solutions to plastic waste incorporating policy, business operations, and citizen Aug-Dec 2020 behavior changes. Alternative methodology to cope with COVID-19 Nov-Dec 2020 Preliminary solutions December 2020 Public service annoucements Photo: Joao Sousa Jan-Feb 2020 Launch in the Caribbean & Oceania The beginning of 2020 marked the launch of the Plastic Waste Free Islands (PWFI) project in Oceania and the Caribbean. In total, six launch events took place in the two regions, hosted by IUCN in cooperation with the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) and the Governments of the six countries. In efforts to assist Pacific countries in reducing plastic waste generation and leakage from islands, inception workshops were hosted with the Fiji Ministry of Waterways and Environment, Vanuatu Department of Environmental Protection and Conservation, Samoa Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LIMITS of SELF-DETERMINATION in OCEANIA Author(S): Terence Wesley-Smith Source: Social and Economic Studies, Vol
    THE LIMITS OF SELF-DETERMINATION IN OCEANIA Author(s): Terence Wesley-Smith Source: Social and Economic Studies, Vol. 56, No. 1/2, The Caribbean and Pacific in a New World Order (March/June 2007), pp. 182-208 Published by: Sir Arthur Lewis Institute of Social and Economic Studies, University of the West Indies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27866500 . Accessed: 11/10/2013 20:07 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of the West Indies and Sir Arthur Lewis Institute of Social and Economic Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social and Economic Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 133.30.14.128 on Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:07:57 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Social and Economic Studies 56:1&2 (2007): 182-208 ISSN:0037-7651 THE LIMITS OF SELF-DETERMINATION IN OCEANIA Terence Wesley-Smith* ABSTRACT This article surveys processes of decolonization and political development inOceania in recent decades and examines why the optimism of the early a years of self government has given way to persistent discourse of crisis, state failure and collapse in some parts of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation 3 ISO Country Code for Representation of Names of Countries
    Recommendation 3 ISO COUNTRY CODE for Representation of Names of Countries At its first session, held in January 1972, the Group of The Working Party on Facilitation of International Trade Experts on Automatic Data Processing and Coding de- Procedures, cided to include in its programme of work the following Being aware of the need of an internationally agreed code task: system to represent names of countries, “To define requirements for country codes for use in Considering the International Standard ISO 3166 “Codes international trade, to be forwarded to ISO and to be for the representation of names of countries” as a suitable pursued in co-operation with it”. basis for application in international trade, It was entrusted to the secretariat to pursue this task. Recommends that the two-letter alphabetic code referred to in the International Standard ISO 3166 as “ISO AL- At a Meeting of the relevant ISO body, Working Group 2 PHA-2 Country Code”, should be used for representing of Technical Committee 46 “Documentation” in April the names of countries for purposes of International Trade 1972, it was agreed to set up a Co-ordination Committee whenever there is a need for a coded alphabetical desig- with the task to prepare proposals regarding a list of nation; entities, candidate numerical and alphabetical codes and maintenance arrangements. This Committee was com- Invites the secretariat to inform the appropriate ISO body posed of one representative each from ISO and ITU and responsible for the maintenance of ISO 3166 of any of the UNCTAD Trade Facilitation Adviser. amendments which the Working Party may suggest.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusive Economic Zones and Pacific Developing Island States - Who Really Gets All the Fish?
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 2006 Exclusive economic zones and Pacific developing island states - who really gets all the fish? Quentin A. Hanich University of Wollongong, [email protected] Ben M. Tsamenyi University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hanich, Quentin A. and Tsamenyi, Ben M., "Exclusive economic zones and Pacific developing island states - who really gets all the fish?" (2006). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 209. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/209 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Exclusive economic zones and Pacific developing island states - who really gets all the fish? Abstract The establishment of exclusive economic zones (EEZs), through the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOSC), changed the allocation of fishing rights. These onesz allocated all fishing rights within 200 nautical miles of land to neighbouring coastal States. This change dramatically increased sovereign rights for Pacific small island States. In many cases, these States, with limited terrestrial resources, were allocated large resource rich EEZs that had previously been dominated by distant water fishing States. Distant water fishing States, concerned that they would lose access to 85-90% of the world's active fishing grounds, argued that the LOSC should impose obligations to ensure optimum utilisation of fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Country Research on Natural Disasters And
    COUNTRY RESEARCH ON NATURAL DISASTERS AND TRADE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1.1. On 26 April 2018, World Trade Organization (WTO) Members approved research funded by the Permanent Mission of Australia to study the impact of natural disasters on trade. The first stage of this work involved examination of the effects of natural disasters on the trade of some recently disaster-affected countries, together with trade policy issues arising. The research looked at the experience of six WTO Members in three regions. Country study one examined Dominica and Saint Lucia in the Caribbean, country study two looked at Nepal in South Asia and country study three surveyed Fiji, Tonga and Vanuatu in the Pacific. The research work was undertaken through a mixture of consultations with government and non-governmental organizations, together with desk research from published sources, including Trade Policy Reviews. 1.2. This note summarises the main findings of the three country research papers. A first section discusses natural hazards faced by the six Members together with the macroeconomic and trade impacts of recent natural disasters. Further sections deal with trade issues arising in disaster response, recovery and resilience among the same six recently disaster-affected WTO Members. NATURAL HAZARDS, MACROECONOMIC AND TRADE IMPACTS 1.3. Dominica, Fiji, Nepal, Saint Lucia, Tonga and Vanuatu face a range of hydro-meteorological hazards (e.g. drought, flooding, landslides and storms, including cyclones and hurricanes) and geo-physical risks (e.g. earthquakes, tsunami and volcanoes). To varying degrees, these events have curtailed economic growth, depressed exports and fuelled import growth, exerting pressure on the current account and debt levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the EU List of Tax Havens
    Evolution of the EU list of tax havens 22 February 2021 12 jurisdictions 9 jurisdictions American Samoa, Anguilla, Australia, Barbados, Botswana, Eswatini, Jamaica, Jordan, Maldives, Dominica, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Thailand, Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands Moved from black list to grey list Barbados Added to the black list Removed from the grey list Dominica Morocco, Namibia and Saint Lucia 6 October 12 jurisdictions 2020 10 jurisdictions American Samoa, Anguilla, Australia, Botswana, Eswatini, Jordan, Maldives, Morocco, Namibia, Barbados, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Saint Lucia, Thailand, Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands 9 jurisdictions Moved from grey list to black list Anguilla American Samoa, Belize, Fiji, Guam, Oman, Samoa, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, Added to the black list Removed from the grey list US Virgin Islands Barbados Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mongolia Removed from the blacklist Cayman Islands, Oman Taxation and Customs Union 18 February 12 jurisdictions 2020 13 jurisdictions American Samoa, Cayman Anguilla, Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Eswatini, Jordan, Islands, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Maldives, Morocco, Mongolia, Namibia, Saint Lucia, Thailand and Turkey Panama, Samoa, Seychelles, Oman, Trinidad and Tobago, Vanuatu, US Virgin Islands Moved from grey list to black list Cayman Islands, Palau and Seychelles Added to the black list Removed from the grey list Panama Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda,
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Australia and New Zealand, Concerning the Status of Elements of the Defence F
    Agreement between Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Australia and New Zealand, concerning the Status of Elements of the Defence F... Australian Treaty Series [Index] [Global Search] [Database Search] [Notes] [Noteup] [Help] Australian Treaty Series 1994 No 30 DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE CANBERRA Agreement between Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Australia and New Zealand, concerning the Status of Elements of the Defence Forces of those Countries Deployed in the North Solomons Province of Papua New Guinea as part of the South Pacific Peacekeeping Force (Suva, 28 September 1994) Entry into force generally and for Australia: 7 October 1994 AUSTRALIAN TREATY SERIES 1994 No. 30 Australian Government Publishing Service Canberra (c) Commonwealth of Australia 1995 AGREEMENT BETWEEN PAPUA NEW GUINEA AND FIJI, TONGA, SOLOMON ISLANDS, VANUATU, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND, CONCERNING THE STATUS OF ELEMENTS OF THE DEFENCE FORCES OF THOSE COUNTRIES DEPLOYED IN THE NORTH SOLOMONS PROVINCE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA AS PART OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC PEACEKEEPING FORCE PAPUA NEW GUINEA, FIJI, TONGA, SOLOMON ISLANDS, VANUATU, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: RECOGNIZING the need for cooperation between countries in the South Pacific; NOTING that on 8 September 1994 Papua New Guinea entered into a Ceasefire Agreement with the Bougainville Revolutionary Army and the organisation known as the Bougainville Interim Government after five years of fighting in Bougainville, North Solomons Province of Papua New Guinea; NOTING FURTHER that the said Ceasefire Agreement provides for a Bougainville Peace Conference to take place at Arawa and for other activities in support of the ceasefire to occur in other agreed places in the said North Solomons Province; http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1994/30.html[04/09/2015 10:32:03] Agreement between Papua New Guinea and Fiji, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Australia and New Zealand, concerning the Status of Elements of the Defence F..
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Testtttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt Country Office Annual Report 2019 Pacific Island Multi-Country Programme Update on the context and situation of children Economic and political context Of the 14 Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTS), 11, including Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), Nauru, Palau, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu and Vanuatu, registered average gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate of 3.1% in 2018 and are projected to grow by a modest 2.8% in 2019 and 3.0% in 2020 (IMF, Oct 2019). GDP increases in recent years have been spurred by growth in fisheries revenues, which increased from 5% of GDP in 2011 to approximately 30% of GDP in 2017. The region has registered steady improvements in social protection, health and education policies, including investment in schools and hospitals, as well as complementary investments in critical urban services infrastructure (ADB, July 2019). However, the recent measles outbreak in the region is likely to dampen other major sources of revenue, such as tourism. Overall, no major, short-term changes are expected with regard to resources for social sectors and children’s issues in the Pacific. Of note, Cook Islands is slated to become the first PICT to achieve ‘developed country’ status. During 2019, there were several changes of political leadership following the elections in six countries Kiribati, FSM, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Solomon Islands and Tuvalu with no significant impact on the programme implementation. The 2019 Pacific Islands Leader Forum held in Tuvalu has urged for more coordinated actions to secure the health and wellbeing of Pacific people in light of the climate crisis.
    [Show full text]