Philosophy Economics & Politics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The London School of Economics and Political Science Mining
The London School of Economics and Political Science Mining Enterprises and Regional Economic Development: An Exploratory Analysis of the Sustainable Development Model Nicolas Di Boscio Thesis submitted to the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, March 2010 Declaration I certify that this thesis is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, as far as I know, infringe the rights of any third party. I wish to extend my thanks to Rio Tinto for the data and material provided and for their support throughout the investigation. As a Rio Tinto employee at the time of writing, I declare that no attempt to interfere with this work or to influence the results of this research has been made by the company or any of its employees. All the views and conclusions put forward are solely my own and do not necessarily represent those of the corporation. 1 Table of contents Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 12 Chapter 1 - New developments in growth theory .................................................. -
Derrida's Open and Its Closure: the Aporia of Différance and the Only
Language, Literature, and Interdisciplinary Studies (LLIDS) ISSN: 2547-0044 http://ellids.com/archives/2018/09/2.1-Wu.pdf CC Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International License www.ellids.com Derrida’s Open and Its Closure: The Aporia of Différance and the Only Logic of Thinking Mengxue Wu “…for an opening is relative to a ‘surrounding plenitude.’”1 “The gallery is the labyrinth which includes in itself its own exits: we have never come upon it as upon a particular case of experience—that which Husserl believes he is describing.”2 Metaphysics—the entire history of metaphysics has been considered as the metaphysics of presence—is closed; it is closed like a dead end. In its “surrounding plenitude” no exit can be found and it is meeting its own death. Though a system of philosophy with incompleteness is not a perfect theory, but the rebuke of how comprehensive and close a philosophy is and the demand of that philosophy to open its house to the alien and the ungraspable would be a preposterous importunity. However, upon the stage where the entire history of Western philosophy has been played, “…nothing is staged or displayed theatrically. Rather, the battle of the new gods against the old is being fought” (Heidegger 22). This battle, between the new gods and the old, between the new thoughts and the old, is a battle of breaking into new ruptures and finding new openings in the old thoughts. At the moment when traditional philosophy has become a closure of the metaphysics of presence, even those streams of thought that already broke new phenomenological grounds in the beginning of twentieth century and Levinas’s ethical breaking are closed “as the self-presence in absolute knowledge” (Derrida 102, SP). -
Annual Report 2020
In pursuit of progress since Annual report 2020 report Annual Annual report 2020 In pursuit of progress since Annual report 2020 report Annual Annual report 2020 CONTENTS ANNUAL REPORT STRATEGIC REPORT 2 Five-year summary 3 Group overview 4 From the chairman 6 From the chief executive 8 From the editor 9 Business review: the year in detail 13 The Economist Educational Foundation 15 The Economist Group and environmental sustainability 17 Corporate governance: the Wates Principles, our Section 172(1) statement and our guiding principles REPORT AND ACCOUNTS GOVERNANCE 22 Directors 23 Executive team 24 Trustees, board committees 25 Directors’ report 28 Directors’ report on remuneration 31 Financial review CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 35 Independent auditor’s report to the members of The Economist Newspaper Limited 38 Consolidated income statement 39 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 40 Consolidated balance sheet 41 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 42 Consolidated cashflow statement 44 Notes to the consolidated financial statements COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 94 Company balance sheet 95 Company statement of changes in equity 96 Notes to the company financial statements NOTICES 108 Notice of annual general meeting 1 STRATEGIC REPORT Five-year summary 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 £m £m £m £m £m Income statement—continuing business* Revenue 326 333 329 303 282 Operating profit 31 31 38 43 47 Profit after taxation 21 25 28 39 37 Profit on sale of CQ-Roll Call, Inc - 43 - - - Profit on sale of Economist Complex - - - - -
Working Paper No. 163
Working Paper No. 163 Liberation technology: Mobile phones and political mobilization in Africa by Marco Manacorda and Andrea Tesei | April 2016 1 Afrobarometer Working Papers Working Paper No. 163 Liberation technology: Mobile phones and political mobilization in Africa by Marco Manacorda and Andrea Tesei | April 2016 Marco Manacorda is a professor at Queen Mary University of London, a CEP (LSE) research associate, and a CEPR research fellow. Email: [email protected]. Andrea Tesei is a lecturer at Queen Mary University of London and a CEP (LSE) research associate. Email: [email protected]. Abstract Can digital information and communication technology (ICT) foster mass political mobilization? We use a novel geo-referenced dataset for the entire African continent between 1998 and 2012 on the coverage of mobile phone signal together with geo-referenced data from multiple sources on the occurrence of protests and on individual participation in protests to bring this argument to empirical scrutiny. We find that mobile phones are instrumental to mass mobilization during economic downturns, when reasons for grievance emerge and the cost of participation falls. Estimated effects are if anything larger once we use an instrumental variable approach that relies on differential trends in coverage across areas with different incidence of lightning strikes. The results are in line with insights from a network model with imperfect information and strategic complementarities in protest provision. Mobile phones make individuals more responsive to both changes in economic conditions – a mechanism that we ascribe to enhanced information – and to their neighbours’ participation – a mechanism that we ascribe to enhanced coordination. -
5 Derrida's Critique of Husserl and the Philosophy
5 DERRIDA’S CRITIQUE OF HUSSERL AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF PRESENCE David B. Allison* Now would be the time to reject the myths of inductivity and of the Wesenschau, which are transmitted, as points of honor, from generation to generation. ...Am I primitively the power to contemplate, a pure look which fixes the things in their temporal and local place and the essences in an invisible heaven; am I this ray of knowing that would have to 1 arise from nowhere? SÍNTESE – O autor reexamina a crítica de Derrida ABSTRACT – The author reexamines Derrida’s à fenomenologia de Husserl de forma a mostrar critique of Husserl’s phenomenology, so as to como a sua coerência estrutural emerge não show how its structural coherency arises not so tanto de uma redução a uma doutrina particular, much from the reduction to a particular doctrine, mas antes das exigências de uma concepção but rather from the demands of a unitary concep- unitária, especificamente impostas pelas deter- tion, specifically from the demands imposed by minações epistemológicas e metafísicas da the epistemological and metaphysical determina- presença. tions of presence. PALAVRAS-CHAVE – Desconstrução. Derrida. KEY WORDS – Deconstruction. Derrida. Husserl. Fenomenologia. Husserl. Presença. Significado. Meaning. Phenomenology. Presence. * Doutor. Professor, State University of New York, Stony Brook, EUA. 1 Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Le Visible et l’invisible (Paris: Editions Gallimard, 1964), Eng. tr., Alphonso Lingis, The Visible and the Invisible (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968). pp. 113-116. VERITAS Porto Alegre v. 50 n. 1 Março 2005 p. 89-99 It is practically a truism to say that most of Husserl’s commentators have in- sisted on the rigorously systematic character of his writings. -
Speech and Phenomena and Other Essays on Husservs Theory of Signs
Jacques Derrida Translated, with an Introduction, by Preface by Speech and Phenomena And Other Essays on HusserVs Theory of Signs DAVID B. ALLISON NEWTON GARVER NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PRESS EVANSTON 19 7 3 Copyright © 1973 by Northwestern University Press All rights reserved library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 72-80565 ISBN 0-8101-0397-4 Printed in the United States of America Speech and Phenomena was originally published in French under the title La Voix et le Phinomene, copyright © 1967 by Presses Uni- versitaires de France. "Form and Meaning" appeared in French under the title "La Forme et le vouloir-dire: Note sur la ph6nom6nologie du langage," in the Revue internaHonale de philosophic, Volume LXXXI (1967). "Differance" appeared in French under the tide "La Difference" in the Bulletin de la Society fran^aise de philosophie, Volume LX1I (1968) and was reprinted in ^Thiorie d'ensembte, a collection of essays published by Editions du Seuil in 1968. Quotations from the following works of Edmund Husserl are used by permission of the publishers: Logical Investigations, translated by J. N. Findlay. Copyright © 1970 by Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, London, and Humanities Press, Inc., New York, Ideas, translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson. Copyright © 1931 by George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London, and Humanities Press, Inc., New York. Jacques Derrida is Professor of Philosophy at the Ecole Normale Sup&ieure of the University of Paris. David B. Allison is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the State Uni• versity of New York at Stony Brook. Contents -
Undermining the Rights and Safety of Workers
Dirty Metals Undermining the Rights and Safety of Workers Mineworker in South Africa / n October 9, 2003, the south face of the Grasberg gold mine in West Papua, Indonesia, collapsed. OEight workers died and five others were injured. Government investigators turned up evidence that in the days leading up to the accident, seismic data had led mine operators to suspect that slippage was immi- nent, and that key machinery—but not workers—had been moved from below the unstable zone. These were not the first deaths at the Grasberg mine, the largest open-pit gold mine in the world. In May 2000, a landslide at the mine’s waste dump claimed four lives, prompting environmentalists and government Photo: ICEM officials to question the safety of recent production increases.46 In 1983, the chief safety engineer of an unnamed South Rock falls, tunnel collapses, fires, heat exhaustion, and African mining corporation told the Economist that “produc- other dangers claim the lives of over 15,000 miners every tion is more important than safety.” No one in a similar posi- year. (Miners in the notoriously dangerous coal mines of tion would go on record with such a statement today. And it China may account for up to half of these deaths.) is true that over the past 20 years, health and safety condi- According to the International Labour Organization (ILO), tions have improved in large-scale corporate operations in deaths within the mining sector as a whole (both metals most countries. Between 1984 and 2001, for instance, the and coal) account for 5 percent of all worker deaths on the average annual death rate in South African gold mines fell job, even though the sector employs just under 1 percent of from 1.23 per 1,000 workers to 1.05 per 1,000, while the all workers worldwide. -
LEVINAS on LAW a Derridean Reading of Manderson's Proximity, Levinas, and the Soul of Law
LEVINAS ON LAW A Derridean Reading of Manderson's Proximity, Levinas, and the Soul of Law Jacques de Ville* In this article, Desmond Manderson's book, Proximity, Levinas, and the Soul of Law (2006), is analysed specifically with reference to the accuracy with which it translates Derrida's thinking into law. Manderson, in a number of instances, invokes Derrida's thinking as a 'corrective' to that of Levinas. The author shows that this invocation by Manderson of Derrida's texts is selective and does not take account of Derrida's broader 'philosophical' approach. The author points to the differences between, but also the correspondence in the thinking of, Levinas and Derrida. He contends that being true to Derrida's thinking requires that proximity be viewed not as simply making law responsive as proposed by Manderson, but as having a paradoxical structure. The latter would give expression to the distinction that Derrida draws between the conditional and the unconditional. Only if proximity is viewed in this manner will judges be faced with a true responsibility in deciding negligence cases; only then will justice stand a chance. Introduction Translating Levinas into law is not a task that many legal scholars undertake. There are, however, a number of scholars who in recent years have made admirable attempts to do so.1 In this article, I reflect on some of the difficulties involved in translating Levinas into law through a 'Derridean' reading of the recently published book of Desmond Manderson, Proximity, Levinas, and the Soul of Law. This book makes a valuable attempt at translating a number of Professor of Law, University of the Western Cape. -
The Science of Writing
The Science of Writing Introduction In 1967 the French philosopher, Jacques Derrida, published in book form a collection of texts he had been composing, under the title De la Grammatologie, Of Grammatology.1 The book was translated into English in 1974 by Gayatri Spivak and, with its one-hundred-page translator’s introduction, constituted the first major introduction to Derrida for English-speaking audiences. In 1985 an American professor of English Literature, Gregory Ulmer, published his engagement with Derrida under the title, Applied Grammatology: Post(e) Pedagogy from Jacques Derrida to Joseph Beuys.2 Ulmer’s investigation is one of the very few instances where Derrida’s mention of ‘grammatology’ is taken up at length. In July 2008, at the Derrida Today conference held at the University of Sydney, in Australia, the French Derrida scholar, Catherine Malabou, presented a key note address that probed the fate of Derrida’s notion of ‘grammatology’ and how its question might be re-engaged or re-invented today.3 By ‘grammatology,’ Derrida inferred a ‘science of writing,’ though an approach to the question of writing that radically engages with the question of science, of truth and of knowing. And if Ulmer activates the question posed by grammatology, it is in order to question a scene of teaching the radically questions writing as such. This paper aims at asking if the work of Derrida and Ulmer has continued relevance for a radicalising of the scene of teaching precisely by a critical engagement with what we commonly name as writing and what we commonly understand as its agency. -
The Politics of Bertrand Russell
CRUSADER AND CASSANDRA CRUSADER AND CASSANDRA: THE POLITICS OF BERTRAND RUSSELL By RON GOLDSTEIN, B. A. A Thesis Submitteo to the Faculty of Graouate Stuoies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University July, 1977 MASTER OF ARTS (1977) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Political Science) Hamilton, Ontario. TITLE: Crusader and Cassandra: The Politics of Bertrand Russell AUTHOR: Ron Goldstein, B. A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Derry Novak NUMBER OF PAGES: (iv) 127 (ii) A C K NOW LED GEM E N T S My first thanks are to Kenneth Blackwell, archivist of McMaster University's Bertrand Russell Archives, for his advice and knowledge on so many aspects of Russell's life and work, and to his assistant, Diane M. Kerss. Both gave freely of their time with unfailing courtesy, and were of great assistance to me. Carole B. Forhan deserves my unqualified appreciation for her patience and the excellent typing of the many drafts of the manuscript. My thanks go also to Professors Derry Novak, Howard ~ster, and Louis Greenspan, who read the manuscript and offered both encour agement and invaluable advice. (iii) TABLE OF C01'TTENTS Page Preface 1 I The Life of The Mind (1) quman }\!ature 5 (2) Education and Individuality .~ 19 II Russell, Marx and Socialism ( l) From liberal humanist to socialist ravolu tionary--and back to liberal again •• 49 (2) Russell contra Marx 55 (3) Russell and the Labour Party •• 76 III The Pur sui t of Peace.. •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• 83 IV Conclusion.. .. .. ... .. .. .• .. .. ... .. .• is.. 109 Bibliography .•.•........... ., ...... 116 (iv) PREFACE The principal theme of this study of Bertrand Russell is that from his unique position as the last of a notable line of English Whig reformers and as the "godson" of John Stuart Mill, "the saint of rationalism", he attempted to make a unique contribution to political philosophy--and failed. -
Keywords in Literature and Culture (KILC). : Modernism
Melba Cuddy-Keane is Emerita Member of the Graduate Department “Modernism: Keywords will be an indispensable Melba Cuddy-Keane of English, University of Toronto, resource from the moment it appears. The work is Adam Hammond and Emerita Professor, University rigorous in theoretical conception, broad in historical of Toronto-Scarborough, Canada. reach, and powerfully revisionary in its implications Alexandra Peat Modernism: Keywords presents a Her publications include Virginia for modernist study. It falls within the distinguished series of short entries explaining Woolf, the Intellectual, and the Public the diverse and often contradictory Sphere (2003), the Harcourt annotated legacy of Raymond Williams but also applies the meanings of words used with frequency edition of Virginia Woolf’s Between most current methods to an expanding archive of and urgency in “written modernism.” the Acts (2008), and contributions to modernist texts. Scholars and students at every Spanning the “long” modernist period A Companion to Modernist Literature level will keep it close at hand.” (from about 1880 to 1950), this work and Culture (Wiley Blackwell, 2006) Michael Levenson, University of Virginia aims not to define the era’s dominant and A Companion to Narrative Modernism “beliefs,” but to highlight and expose Theory (Wiley Blackwell, 2005). its salient controversies and changing cultural thought. Guided by the cultural Adam Hammond recently completed Keywords lexicography developed by Raymond an SSHRC postdoctoral fellowship at Williams in his ground-breaking work, the University of Victoria and is currently Keywords (1976), the entries here focus the Michael Ridley Postdoctoral Fellow on words with unstable meanings in Digital Humanities at the University and conflicting definitions, tracking of Guelph, Canada. -
Press Release
The Economist Intelligence Unit 20 Cabot Square London E14 4QW Telephone 020 7576 8000 Fax 020 7576 8500 www.eiu.com Press release Press enquiries Joanne McKenna: +44 (0)20 7576 8188 or [email protected] For immediate release: Asking better questions of data boosts performance, says Economist Intelligence Unit report An ability to ask better questions of data is central to driving better business outcomes, according to In search of insight and foresight: Getting more out of big data, an Economist Intelligence Unit report, sponsored by Oracle and Intel. According to a global EIU survey for this report, the vast majority of executives agree that asking better questions of data has already improved their organisation’s performance and will continue to lift it in the coming years. Nevertheless, many companies struggle to use data to gain insight into their business—and foresight into how best to move it forward. Lessons from successful firms reveal that achieving insight and foresight requires crafting savvy questions that test smart hypotheses, both of which are best fostered by open corporate cultures that prize data and its exploration. Other key findings include: • Focusing on a business outcome is crucial, yet a struggle for most companies. Defining, agreeing on and gearing data analyses towards clear, specific and relevant business objectives is difficult for many companies and a critical obstacle to translating data into insights, results and competitive advantage. Executives overwhelmingly consider predictions (70%) the most critical type of data insight for C-level decisions, followed by insights into trends (43%). • The main challenges are people-related.