DOCSLIB.ORG

Pdf 11730.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pdf 11730.Pdf The Professional Bulletin of Army Engineers January-March 2005 Headquarters, Department of the Army Volume 35 PB 5-05-1 UNITED STATES ARMY FEATURES ENGINEER SCHOOL 4 Developingthe Right Skills and Tools- As a Team! By Major General Randal R. Castro and Lieutenant Colonel Paul L. Grosskruger COMMANDANT 7 Communication-The Key to Our Success Major General By Lieutenant Colonel Paul L. Grosskruger Randal R. Castro 9 Training leaders for Combat By Lieutenant Colonel Shawn Howley 11 IntegrationofTopographic EngineeringSkills and Tools-Providing Assured MANAGING EDITOR Mobility with C2 Systems Shirley Bridges By Mr. Ken Bergman CONTRIBUTING EDITORS 14 UsingTopographic Engineeringto Achieve Dominance in Urbanand Complex Terrain Karin Gan By Mr. Ken Bergman Cheryl Green Penny Moats 18 Warrior Ethos,Tasks, and Drills Spiral Into Initial-EntryTraining Kathy Webber By Major Janet Kirkton 22 TaskForce Trailblazer:ProvidingAssured Mobility GRAPHIC DESIGNER By Major Paul D. Harron Jennifer Morgan 28 lED Defeat: ObservationsFrom the NationalTraining Center By Lieutenant Colonel Thomas H. Magness 32 CounteringIEDsand Explosive Hazards Front Cover: By Mr. Robert G Baker and Mr. Dorian V. D'Aria Cover illustration by Alan 37 Heavy Rescue Operations During Operation Iraqi Freedom Speer - Multimedia Visual Information Service By Major Adam S. Roth Center 40 EODand Engineers"Closethe Gap" By Lieutenant Colonel Craig Jolly Back Cover: 49 Antipersonnel Obstacle Breaching System Photographs courtesy of By Mr. Bobby Skinner US Army and other sources. 50 Equippingthe FutureForce Sapper By Captain Michael P. Frank 53 Combat Service Support to the Future Engineer Force: A Modular Approach By Major Brian D. Slack 59 The FutureArmyTactical Fire FightingTruck By Major Mollie Pearson and Mr. Michael Bonomolo DEPARTMENTS 35 Personal Viewpoint - "Command and Control of 2 Clear the Way Construction Assets in Iraq" By Major GeneralRandal R. Castro By Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey R. Eckstein 3 lead the Way 46 CTC Notes - "lED Defeat Training" By Captain Andrew Liffring, Captain Jason By Command Sergeant Major Clinton J. Pearson Railsback, and Captain Matthew Louvet (NTC) 25 Personnel Notes - "Officer Professional Development" Dedication By Chief Warrant Officer 4 Frederick Kerber 54 Personal Viewpoint - "Theater Engineer 26 Personnel Notes - "Enlisted Career Progression" 55 Transformation" By Sergeant First Class David Hatch By Colonel Gerald Lago January-March 2005 Engineer 1 Developing the Right Skills and Tools— As a Team! By Major General Randal R. Castro and Lieutenant Colonel Paul L. Grosskruger hroughout its history, the Engineer Regiment has A New Approach distinguished itself, time and time again, by its support Tto our Nation. And at this point in our history, we stand he doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leader together at a crossroads of relevance. We must select the development, personnel, and facilities (DOTMLPF) right fork in the road—that which takes us toward developing Tassessment approach has served the Army and the relevant skills and tools for our units and staffs. We must Engineer Regiment well and is the foundation for the future. quickly address capability gaps in urban and complex terrain. But we have to be much better at getting the skills and tools to We must ask ourselves “Do they have the tools they need?” our engineer Soldiers, staffs, and units to keep them “Are we skilled to accomplish the tasks required?” “Do we indispensable to the land component maneuver commander. have the right organizations?” It is up to us to seize the initiative Our focus needs to be on continual “gap analysis” of engineer and make this happen! support to maneuver in complex and urban terrain. This approach also continuously incorporates today’s lessons Challenges and Opportunities learned and provides refinement in placing the right mix of skills and tools into our Future Engineer Force. This concept oday’s landscape is changing by the minute. It’s filled focuses our limited resources, maximizes our use of with quickly evolving technologies, instantaneous collaboration across the Regiment, and sets forth short- and Tglobal communication, and increasingly complex urban long-term goals. population centers and terrain—together with highly adaptive, deadly, motivated, and elusive enemies who play by their own Skills rules. In response, the Army has begun to adapt to meet the We must strive to ensure that our skills are relevant today challenges with more responsive, specialized, modularized, and tomorrow and that they are indispensable to the land effects-based organizations or modules. These capabilities- component maneuver commander. We have focused our based modules—centered upon the brigade combat team, the efforts for years on engineer skills supporting maneuver in units of employment-tactical (UEx), and units of employment- open and rolling terrain. Operations in complex and urban operational (UEy)—are right for our Army. terrain—today and in the future—demonstrate the need for Taking the concept of modularity to completion will reduce getting better skills for our Soldiers and staffs to enable the number of engineer battalions. However, the Regiment mobility in conjunction with maneuver in such terrain. Soldiers you see as a result of modularity is not the Regiment of must first be warriors, fully versed in battlefield fundamentals tomorrow. Several Department of the Army-level studies have of “shoot, move, and communicate” and in expertly executing shown that future engineer requirements have actually their military occupational specialties—from the moment they increased. These requirements, coupled with numbers of leave one-station unit training (OSUT) and advanced individual engineer headquarters based on a “bottoms-up” process,will training (AIT). Sappers must be skilled in pattern analysis, ultimately require more engineer structure than we had prior change detection, search, reconnaissance, and terrain to modularity. At the brigade level is where we will mix and visualization. We all must be trained to expertly predict, prevent, match modules. From the brigade level on down, we will be detect, and avoid today’s improvised explosive devices (IEDs), better able to provide a full range of support to our Army and bridge the gaps, ensure security of lines of communication, to our Regiment. The message is loud and clear: “We’re coming and many other engineer-unique missions. Specialized training back!” such as the Sapper Leader Course, Urban Mobility Breacher xx Engineer January-March 2005 (need a caption) Course, search courses, and specialty courses must be maintaining lines of communication (ports, airfields, and roads), standards for our Soldiers and leaders. Finally, we must tighten logistic support areas, and lodgment areas. the linkage between our Soldiers, leaders, and staffs in combat and our institutional schools and laboratories. Skills must also Lessons Learned be linked with building future modular units. This must be a We cannot develop relevant skills and tools for our Soldiers, continuous approach where we constantly assess our current leaders, and units without incorporating observations, needs, skills and update the training of our Soldiers, leaders, and and lessons learned. Our manning and equipping strategies staffs. must be closely linked with the Total Engineer Force, continuously gaining feedback and sharing developments. It Tools is critical for our units to forward lessons learned and Our tools are—and always will be—our credentials and recommended solutions to our institutions, because they “stock in trade.” They are inseparable from our skills and the provide an incredible windfall of information to develop lessons learned from today’s operations and lead to the right solutions for better skills and tools. This not only yields better effects for our Army. As with our skills, our tools have been Soldiers and units but also provides invaluable feedback to designed to dominate open and rolling terrain. But today’s our concepts teams as we craft the Future Engineer Force. operations require our engineer tools to address the immense challenges of complex and urban terrain in addition to open Future Engineer Force and rolling terrain. We continue the massive efforts associated with We are finding major equipment capability gaps for our transforming the Engineer Regiment into a more responsive Soldiers and units in providing assured mobility in complex and effective organization for our Army. The future engineer and urban terrain. Some tools are out there—such as urban structure will provide more leadership challenges, breachers, mine detectors, specialized explosives, mine and opportunities, and professional development for our Soldiers search dogs, RG-31 and Buffalo armored vehicles, and and leaders than we have had in the past. Our Future Engineer reconnaissance tools. In addition, the Digital Terrain Support Force is a total, top-to-bottom design of the Regiment that— System and TeleEngineering Kits are making great impacts. All engineers must seek out and obtain these emerging tools. Is capabilities- and module-based. Much more work is needed in getting the right tools to our Brings to bear the entire Regiment. units and engineer staffs and making them more indispensable. Provides professional growth. Efforts in networked air and ground technologies to detect and neutralize explosives and other hazards are needed. Also, Mixes and matches the right effects for the operation from we need to pursue modernizing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Business Leaders in Action Results for America
    Business Executives for National Security Business Leaders in Action LEADERSHIP REPORT 2009 Results for America Business Executives for National Security Business Leaders in Action Results for America Leadership Report 2009 Printed March 2009 1 Joseph E. Robert, Jr., Chairman Bringing business models to our nation’s security To Our Members: www.bens.org Upon assuming the Chairmanship of BENS nearly two years ago, I • laid out an over-arching goal of expanding our reach – deploying the unique skills and perspectives of business executives to tackle new national security challenges while continuing to address issues where we already have a reputation for making positive change. f 202-296-2490 • This report, the first of its kind, summarizes BENS’ work over the past year, from advo- cating smart spending at the Pentagon to innovative disaster response solutions. We are also partnering with others to bring the BENS methodology to address significant chal- lenges such as cyber security and energy. Regardless of where BENS is involved, one thing is clear: There has never been a more opportune time for business executives to p 202-296-2125 help improve America’s security. • Keeping the momentum of our current initiatives while expanding our reach naturally requires resources. I’m proud to note that despite the economy’s difficulties last year, BENS made a strong financial finish in 2008. But as we all know, the economy is still very fragile and likely to pose even greater challenges in 2009. Nevertheless, I’m con- fident that with your involvement and support, BENS will grow and continue to make Washington, DC 20006 significant contributions to our nation’s security.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of War Conference 2016 Program
    NEW AMERICA NEW AMERICA AND ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PRESENT FUTURE OF WAR 2016 MARCH 10, 2016 #FutureofWar The Future of War Conference is a Partnership of Our media partners About the Future of War Project The Future of War Project explores the social, and addressing armed conflict and systematic political, economic, and cultural implications violence. of the changing nature of conflict and war. It is an interdisciplinary partnership that links New Over the past year, New America fellows, America, a D.C.-based think tank and civic the International Security Program, and enterprise with Arizona State University, one Future of War team have engaged with these of the nation’s largest and most innovative topics through the publication of books and public research universities. a research paper. In May 2015, New America Senior Fellow Chris Fussell published Team The first annual Future of War Conference of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a was held in Washington, D.C. on Feb. 24, 2015 Complex World, which he co-authored with and brought together notable policy makers Gen. Stanley McChrystal. In June 2015, New and experts such as former Chief of Staff America Strategist and Senior Fellow Peter W. of the U.S. Army GEN Raymond T. Odierno, Singer published Ghost Fleet: A Novel of the Vice Chief of Naval Operations ADM Michelle Next World War. In February 2016, International Howard, Sen. John McCain, DARPA Director Security Program Director Peter Bergen’s Dr. Arati Prabhakar, and King’s College United States of Jihad and Senior Future London Emeritus Professor of War Studies Sir of War Fellow David Kilcullen’s Blood Year: Lawrence Freedman.
    [Show full text]
  • Band of Brothers Or Dysfunctional Family? a Military Perspective on Coalition Challenges During Stability Operations
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND mono- graphs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Band of Brothers or Dysfunctional Family? A Military Perspective on Coalition Challenges During Stability Operations Russell W.
    [Show full text]
  • $6.1 Million Gift from H. Ross Perot Funds Two New
    No. 8/Spring 2010 $6.1 million gift from INSIDE H. Ross Perot This Edition: funds two new programs Rep. Skelton supports Five-Star – page 17 Commemorative Coin Act Foundation trustee receives AUSA’s highest award New satellite campus opens at Redstone Arsenal Lt. Gen. Caldwell reports from the field Inaugural Ethics Symposium CGSC Foundation Press publishes first book FROM THE PRESIDENT Gratitude Hyrum W. Smith s I have contemplated my been mine to address the last five I am very grateful for the wonderful letter for this issue of our classes here at the college. Standing military system in this country that magazine I feel a need to on the stage in Eisenhower hall, produces men like Dave Petraeus, Bill A share with you the most speaking to over a thousand young Caldwell, Ed Cardon, Bob Caslen, profound emotion that has been flood- Bob Arter, John Miller, Bill ing my system. The emotion that has Richardson etc., etc. I could make a been almost overwhelming for me is very long list. These men didn’t just the emotion of Gratitude. happen; they were grown here at Fort Let me list some of things for Leavenworth. which I am most grateful: I am Having had the opportunity this grateful to have been asked to be month of being part of the 65th part of this foundation almost four anniversary of the battle of Iwo Jima, years ago. I am grateful for the on the island of Iwo Jima, I am opportunity to rub shoulders with humbly more grateful than ever for men and women in uniform and the the sacrifice men and women in uni- trustees of this foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Syllabus, Spring 2018
    FUTURE OF WAR POS 394/HON 394 SPRING 2018; WEDNESDAY 4:50 PM – 7:35 PM PAYNE HALL L1-32 Professor Daniel Rothenberg Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Coor 6692, Wednesdays 2:00-4:00 PM and by appointment Professor Peter L. Bergen Email: [email protected] Pablo Ortega Poveda, Graduate Teaching Assistant Email: [email protected] COURSE OVERVIEW This course engages the social, political, economic, and cultural implications of the changing nature of war and conflict. The class provides an overview of some classic philosophical and military-strategic theories and conceptions of war, an introduction to the laws of war, and a consideration of a number of broad trends in global conflict. The class looks at key elements of the current transformation of conflict including new and emerging technologies such as drones and autonomous weapons and the complex threats of global terrorism. It also considers the psychological, social and humanitarian impact of conflict through a review of the plight of refugees and internally displaced persons with a focus on recent events in Syria. The course contextualizes these issues and debates in relation to the post-9/11 wars, with a consideration of how the U.S. goes to war, the rise of ISIS, domestic terrorism and how recent conflicts have impacted the U.S. military and the larger American society. The class is taught by Prof. Peter L. Bergen and Prof. Daniel Rothenberg, co-directors of ASU’s Center on the Future of War (https://futureofwar.asu.edu/). All course material including readings, assignments and other relevant class information is available on the course Blackboard site.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Th Mountain Division Makes Its Return to Colorado
    VOLUME 46 2016 NUMBER 3 10TH MOUNTAIN DIVISION MAKES ITS RETURN TO COLORADO Keli Schmid aligned with the 10th Mtn Div (LI) which is ARCHIVIST, DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY based at Fort Drum, NY. In a re-patching For the first time since 1945, as part of a ceremony held on Oct. 30, 2016, at Camp pilot training program, the 10th Mountain Hale, CO, the Mountain tab was presented Division will have a presence in Colorado. to the six companies of the battalion, which The program pairs Army Reserve and Na- are based in Alamosa, Colorado Springs, tional Guard units with active-duty units for Fort Lupton, Grand Junction and Windsor. improved training. The 1st Battalion, 157th Throughout the proceedings, attendees Infantry of the Colorado National Guard has were awed by soldiers in traditional 10th Mountain Division uniforms standing on cliff tops and giving climbing demonstra- tions on the cliff faces adjacent to the cer- emony. The ceremony included remarks from veteran Hugh Evans (85-C, A), who served with the 10th in WWII. Evans introduced PHOTOS BY MELANIE LOVELAND himself by name, rank and serial number, Veterans of the original WWII 10th watch and then called on each of the other 10 Dole, Jr. — whose father, Charles Minot was his life.” as Army Reserve and National Guardsmen Division veterans present to do the same. “Minnie” Dole, lobbied for the first United The new alignment will not only allow return the division to Colorado. From left Sandy Treat (86-H) introduced himself States Army mountain troops in 1940 — led the Colorado National Guard to train with are Don Todd, Marlin Wineberg, Dick and gave his rank, but jokingly told Hugh attendees in a few verses of the Division’s one of the most-deployed divisions in the Over, Charles Woudenberg, Clarence to “forget the serial number.” Evans then “official” song, “90 Pounds of Rucksack.” Army, but will also allow the 10th Mountain Dawson and Neal Yorker.
    [Show full text]
  • Defeating the Taliban in Sangin
    JULY 2011 The Third Way of COIN: Defeating the Taliban in Sangin By Dr. Mark Moyar | Copyright© 2011 Orbis Operations, LLC The Third Way of COIN: Defeating the Taliban in Sangin 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The history of counterinsurgency in Sangin district offers a wealth of insights into the nature of the war in Afghanistan and the path that coalition forces should now follow. From 2006 to 2011, coalition forces took three distinct approaches to counterinsurgency in Sangin. The first two—the enemy-centric approach and the population-centric approach—failed to suppress the insurgents. The enemy-centric approach failed because it did not provide the population with adequate governance or deprive the insurgents of access to the population. The population- centric approach failed because the enemy’s persistent military strength impeded governance and discouraged popular support for the government. Coalition forces adhered to the enemy- centric and population-centric approaches for four and a half years, from the beginning of 2006 to the summer of 2010, during which time they sustained one hundred fatalities and many times that number in wounded. In the fall of 2010, the 3rd Battalion of the 5th U.S. Marine Regiment arrived in Sangin and began a counterinsurgency campaign that combined elements of the enemy-centric and population- centric approaches, emblematic of a shift in many Afghan districts that accompanied the arrival of General David Petraeus as ISAF commander. The Marines conducted enemy-centric security operations in unpopulated areas, to disrupt and destroy enemy forces, and population-centric security operations in populous areas, to obstruct the insurgent shadow government and allow the government to supplant it.
    [Show full text]
  • US and Coalition Military Operations in Afghanistan: Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL33503 U.S. and Coalition Military Operations in Afghanistan: Issues for Congress Updated December 11, 2006 Andrew Feickert Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division U.S. and Coalition Military Operations in Afghanistan: Issues for Congress Summary The U.S. military has been involved in Afghanistan since the fall of 2001 when Operation Enduring Freedom toppled the Taliban regime and attacked the Al Qaeda terrorist network hosted by the Taliban. A significant U.S. military presence in the country could continue for many years as U.S., North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Coalition, and Afghan National Army (ANA) forces attempt to stabilize the country by defeating the insurgency, facilitating reconstruction, and combating Afghanistan’s illegal drug trade. Despite NATO’s assumption of command of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), the United States will remain the largest troop contributing nation and will continue Operation Enduring Freedom, intended to locate and destroy insurgents and terrorists operating in Afghanistan. Recent NATO combat operations have resulted in a request for an additional 2,000 to 2,500 NATO troops as well as a call for NATO nations to rescind national caveats on how their forces may be employed in Afghanistan. Insurgent activity continues to evolve, with some of the tactics and techniques being used by Afghan insurgents reportedly similar to those employed in Iraq. Reports suggest that instead of building a 70,000 soldier Afghan National Army as agreed to in the 2002 Bonn Conference, the Administration intends to support a 50,000 soldier force, while some Afghan officials suggest that a 150,000 man Afghan National Army will be needed to insure both internal and external security.
    [Show full text]
  • The Building Blocks of a Ready Military
    The Building Blocks of a Ready Military: People, Funding, Tempo January 2017 Task Force on Defense Personnel Co-Chairs Leon Panetta Former Secretary of Defense Former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency Jim Talent Former Senator Member of the National Defense Panel Jim Jones Former National Security Advisor 32nd Commandant of the Marine Corps; General (ret.), U.S. Marine Corps Kathy Roth-Douquet Former White House and Defense Department official Chief Executive Officer of Blue Star Families 1 bipartisanpolicy.org Members Norm Coleman Charles Wald Former Senator Former Deputy Commander of U.S. European Command General (ret.), U.S. Air Force Sam Nunn Former Senator Benjamin Freakley Former Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee Former Commander of U.S. Army Accessions Command Lieutenant General (ret.), U.S. Army Pete Domenici Former Senator Bruce Green Former Chairman of the Senate Budget Committee Former Air Force Surgeon General Lieutenant General (ret.), U.S. Air Force Donna Shalala Former Secretary of Health and Human Services Arnold Punaro President of the Clinton Foundation Former Staff Director for the Senate Armed Services Committee Dan Glickman Major General (ret.), U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Former Secretary of Agriculture Former Representative Todd Bowers Director of UberMILITARY Eric Edelman Former Noncommissioned Officer, Former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy U.S. Marine Corps Reserve Former Ambassador to Turkey and Finland Ken Harbaugh James Miller President and Chief Operating Officer Former Undersecretary of Defense for Policy of Team Rubicon Global, Ltd. David Chu Former Officer, U.S. Navy Former Undersecretary of Defense Anthony Woods for Personnel and Readiness Former White House Fellow President and Chief Executive Officer Former Officer, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • GCMO Army ROTC 2010 Program 3-29-10
    ARMY CADET COMMAND GEORGE C. M ARSHALL AWARDS & LEADERSHIP SEMINAR April 13-16, 2010 GE ORGE C. MARSHALL OUTR EACH “… the most valuable single measure of national defense we had available was the Reserve Corps built up by the R.O.T.C. That has been of more positive assistance in meeting this emergency than any other single thing that has been provided by Congress .” —General George C. Marshall to a Senate panel, April 22, 1941 ARMY CADET COMMAND GEORGE C. M ARSHALL AWARDS & LEADERSHIP SEMINAR April 13-16, 2010 Seminar Chairman General J.H. Binford Peay, III, USA (Ret) GE ORGE C. MARSHALL OUTR EACH E L U D Tuesday 13 April 2010 E H 1000 – 2000 Registration C Natural Bridge Hotel S 1830 – 2030 Informal Buffet for Award Winners Natural Bridge Hotel 1830 – 2030 Informal Buffet for Seminar Leaders and Guests (by invitation ) Hosted by MG Arthur Bartell and Mr. Brian Shaw Lexington Golf and Country Club Wednesday 14 April 2010 0630 – 0800 Breakfast Buffet Natural Bridge Hotel Special Guest: Major General Douglas L. Carver, U.S. Army Chief of Chaplains (0730) 0900 – 1030 Marshall Foundation Concurrent Programs Tours: Marshall Museum, VMI Post, W& L, and Historic Lexington 0930 Meeting of Cadre members supporting “Role of the Platoon Leader & NCO” Pogue Auditorium, Marshall Foundation 0930 Meeting of other Roundtable Leaders Lovett Reading Room, Marshall Foundation 2 E L U D E H C S 1045 – 1145 Opening Session Marshall Hall, Center for Leadership and Ethics, VMI Welcome and Introductions— Post Colors, National Anthem Brian Shaw, President, George C.
    [Show full text]
  • INFANTRY in BATTLE from Somalia to the Global War on Terror
    INFANTRY IN BATTLE From Somalia to the Global War on Terror I love the infantrymen because they are the underdogs. They are the mud-rain-and-wind boys. They have no comforts, and they learn to live without necessities. And in the end, they are the guys that wars can’t be won without. Ernie Pyle New York World Telegram 5 May 1943 August 2005 CONTENTS CHAPTER Page INTRODUCTION ................................................. iii EDITOR‘S NOTES .................................................v 1. LEADERSHIP .........................................................1 2. INITIATIVE ..........................................................23 3. ADAPTABILITY ..................................................35 4. USING TERRAIN .................................................65 5. RECONNAISSANCE..........................................109 6. COMBINED ARMS ............................................129 7. MUTUAL SUPPORT ..........................................163 8. MARKSMANSHIP .............................................183 9. SECURITY ..........................................................193 10. REPORTING .......................................................217 11. PATROLLING ....................................................227 12. RULES OF ENGAGEMENT ..............................233 13. CASUALTIES .....................................................247 14. CIVILIAN CONSIDERATIONS ........................257 15. U.S. ARMY VALUES .........................................279 16. CONCLUSION ....................................................317
    [Show full text]
  • Course Syllabus, Spring 2016
    FUTURE OF WAR – POS 394 WEDNESDAY 4:30 PM – 7:15 PM COLLEGE OF DESIGN NORTH 62 SPRING 2016 Professor Daniel Rothenberg Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Coor 6675, Wednesdays 2:00-4:00 PM and by appointment Professor Peter L. Bergen Email: [email protected] Paul Lohse, Graduate Teaching Assistant Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Coor 6775, Wednesdays 1:00-2:00 PM and by appointment COURSE OVERVIEW This course engages the profound social, political, economic, and cultural implications of the changing nature of war and conflict. The class provides an overview of some classic philosophical and military- strategic theories and conceptions of war, an introduction to the laws of war and a consideration of broad trends in global conflict including the decline in interstate war and emerging ideas on civilizational conflict and preventative war. The class looks at key elements of the current transformation of conflict including new and emerging technologies such as drones and cyberwar and the complex threats of global terrorism. It also considers the psychological and humanitarian impact of conflict through a review of the plight refugees and internally displaced persons with a focus on recent events in Syria as well as a review of moral injury among U.S. soldiers and their families. The course contextualizes these issues and debates in relation to the post-9/11 wars, with a special focus on the case of Iraq from 2003 to the present, including a consideration of how the U.S. goes to war, the rise of ISIS, domestic terrorism and how recent conflicts have impacted the U.S.
    [Show full text]