DOCSLIB.ORG

Skyscraper Watch Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Skyscraper Watch Online Skyscraper watch online Continue Our friend joergermeister runs Windows 10 in this desktop, but as always, he's set up to look and work the way he wants, and the end result looks great. If you like to watch - or even just some of the look-here to get it for yourself. First of all, since it's a Windows desktop, Rainmeter is the order of the day and this top guide will help you get through the basics. It's a bit dated, but enough to get you started with the skins and tools below. Rainmeter is a powerful tool that allows you to create a beautiful, information-rich one-on-one display... Read moreOnce you have the basics down, here's what you need: All together, it's a beautiful picture. I especially like the visual style and taskbar and transparency of the start menu, this is something I could grab even if I didn't customize the rest of my desktop to the same extent, but it's still great together. If you have questions about how it's all done, or want to know how this skin looks exactly the way it does, hit the Flickr link below to head the joergermeister page and ask. Do you have a nice, functional desktop yourself to show off? Share it with us! Post it on your personal Kinja blog using the DesktopShowcase tag or add it to our Lifehacker Desktop Show and tell Flickr Pool. Screenshots should be at least 1280x720 and please include information about what you have used, links to wallpapers, skins and themes, and any other relevant details. If your amazing desktop catches your eye, you can get featured! Pimp My Desktop Part 70 Flickr Skyscrapers Are Killing Our Cities. Just like cookies, while one or two are fine, if you have too much, everything is thrown out of balance. The problem is that these huge buildings stand apart and don't belong to their surroundings, instead after an almost cookie cutter design and creating a semblance of the skyline of every large (and not so large) city. This is the argument of the writer Eric Reguli. Taking London as an example, he cites the tall behemoths who dwarf existing buildings in London's financial district. The square mile is known to be full of beautiful, historic (and short) buildings, but the entrance of tall status symbols quickly undermines the character of the city. The architecture of our great cities becomes homogeneous as the choice of shops on our streets in the city center, and in our shopping malls. Skyscrapers are also environmental disasters. You can't open the windows, so you need air conditioning for the whole summer, and no matter how big a multi glazed window might be on insulation, it doesn't beat a good foot or two stone walls to regulate the temperature. In summer, they keep warm and act as a heater for storage in winter. Too hot? Air a bit Open the window. These vertical islands are not only sucking out resources and surrounding streets in shadow, but they are disposable structures. Bank towers with huge open trading floors connected to the fastest communication networks cannot be easily converted into housing, factories or shops, says Reguli. In contrast, the old low-rise building can be remodeled, over and over again. Factories are becoming loft apartment buildings, like old red brick British schools. One of London's most famous art galleries, Tate Modern, is located in a former power station near the Thames, and its vast ground floor space of Turbine Hall has done much to bring art to the public, which usually won't bother. Skyscrapers, on the other hand, have more to do with the quick fashion clothes you find in the NSM than they do with the old wool coat you can pass on to your grandchildren. For the most part, Reguli writes, skyscrapers should be demolished when they have outlived their usefulness. And the more attention-grabbing Renaissance cod is, the more wasteful it is to demolish them. In the past, we have reported (with typical enthusiasm) about several skyscraper proposals that include trees in projects, including a farmscraper proposal for China and Milan Bosco Verticale back in 2011, which is now nearing completion. But an article on the architecture blog Beyond the Square Mile by Tim De Chant (who was reposted on the slate), argues that for technical reasons, we might not really ever see the kind of thriving vertical forest these drawings describe. De Chant kindly asks architects to please stop drawing trees on top of skyscrapers. From your post: Want a skyscraper to look fashionable and sustainable? Put a tree on it. Or better yet, dozens. Many of the skyscrapers with a high concept are decorated with trees. On the roof, on the terraces, in the nooks and crannies, on absurdly large balconies. Mostly anywhere horizontal and high off the ground. Now, I have to say, architects are drawing dozens because I still haven't seen one of these green skyscrapers in real life. [...] If- and it's the biggest if any of these buildings ever get built, chances are they'll be stripped of foliage faster than the developer can say return on investment. It's just unreal. I understand why architects paint them on their buildings. Really, I do. But can we stop? According to De Shant, who has studied plant physiology, there are many reasons why trees won't thrive on top of high-rise buildings, including fierce winds, extreme heat and cold, higher rainfall rates, and logistical problems like watering, fertilizer, and pruning trees. Trees just weren't made for such conditions, he writes, adding: 'It might all seem a bit funny coming from someone like me, a supporter of more trees in the city It probably comes from the fact that seen too much green vertical oasis, but too few of them are actually built. His post is an interesting reality check for idealistic, tree-loving townspeople and architects who fuel their fantasies. But the Milan Tower would be a good way to prove your theory right or wrong. Mike KempGetty images in many ways, skyscrapers came to define the 20th century. Rising from the skeletons of steel, iron and glass, they showed the world a new landscape and ecosystem. Cities are becoming incomplete without their own, and some like Hong Kong or New York have gone full on buildings 150 feet or higher, with 355 and 280, respectively. But as climate change defines the 21st century, skyscrapers are among the first targets that an urban developer would like to customize. It's easy to see why: they take a huge amount of resources. With modern technology, the tower will always be more energy-intensive, Philip Honnorat, head of construction services at the UK-headquartered firm WSP, said in 2013. If you are going to wash or shower on the 80th floor, you should bring water there. When you take a purchase up to your apartment in an elevator that will consume more energy than if you lived on the ground floor. The problem, Vonnrat said at the time, is that while the one-to-one comparison to a skyscraper is dirtier than a smaller building, a city filled with them can have an advantage. In Manhattan, most people don't even own cars, while Los Angeles has many low-rise, low-energy buildings that can only be reached by car, and require extensive energy and water infrastructure. Based on construction after construction, it's not the headpiece that towers use more energy. Here are some buildings, some iconic and some brand new, pointing the way to a more sustainable future. They earned their green status through the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) accreditation program, which is overseen by the nonprofit U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). Advertising - Continue reading below 1 Empire State Building, New York One of the most famous LEED certified buildings in the world, the Empire State Building originally finished construction in 1931 and was the tallest building in the world for 40 years. Featured in countless films, building the right to LEED Gold certification in 2011. That same year, it saved $2.4 million on energy. In 2012, the building saved $2.3 million. These savings have allowed the classical building to gain modern relevance with higher occupancy rates. Energy efficiency has been a huge part of our success in repositioning the building, said Anthony Malkin, president of Malkin Properties, which building, in 2013. 2 Two International Financial Centers, Hong Kong, China International Financial Center in Hong Kong is divided into two towers, 1IFC and 2IFC. 1,352 feet tall, the 84-something building has elevators and was completed in 2003. It is the 27th tallest building in the world and the second tallest in Hong Kong. He received a LEED gold certificate with his efforts to maximize natural light by minimizing increased solar heat, and reduced noise intrusion. 3 Jin Mao Tower, Shanghai, China Certified at LEED Gold level in 2013, Jin Mao Tower 1,380 feet high with 61 elevators. Built in 1999, the tower is the 24th tallest building in the world and the 12th tallest building in China. This building that shows going green can integrate historical styles with its traditional Chinese architectural style. According to World Architecture News, the best strategies for maintaining the tower included re-recycling or recycling 70% of all durable goods and leaking 70% of the waste accumulated from the facility's modification and add-on.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read Where Architecture Expert Paul Goldberg Comments on the History of New York's Famous Skyscrapers. As You Do So, Complete
    Can you identify any of these buildings? What do they all have in common? Which one do you like best? Read where architecture expert Paul Goldberg comments on the history of New York’s famous skyscrapers. As you do so, complete the following tasks: · In New York buildings are not only buildings, they become ___________________ · New York took over Chicago as regards skyscrapers in ___________________. · The Woolworth building was the tallest building worldwide for _________________. · The _______________ defined the Manhattan skyline. · They are trying to keep a memory of the people who were lost and also to show New York’s ______________________________. · New York stands out from the other cities as the embodiment of ____________________. Woolworth Building; Empire State Building; Chrysler Building; Flatiron; Hearst Tower The Woolworth Building, at 57 stories (floors), is one of the oldest—and one of the most famous—skyscrapers in New York City. It was the world’s tallest building for 17 years. More than 95 years after its construction, it is still one of the fifty tallest buildings in the United States as well as one of the twenty tallest buildings in New York City. The building is a National Historic Landmark, having been listed in 1966. The Empire State Building is a 102-story landmark Art Deco skyscraper in New York City at the intersection of Fifth Avenue and West 34th Street. Like many New York building, it has become seen as a work of art. Its name is derived from the nickname for New York, The Empire State. It stood as the world's tallest building for more than 40 years, from its completion in 1931 until construction of the World Trade Center's North Tower was completed in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRYSLER BUILDING, 405 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 12. 1978~ Designation List 118 LP-0992 CHRYSLER BUILDING, 405 Lexington Avenue, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1928- 1930; architect William Van Alen. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1297, Lot 23. On March 14, 1978, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a_public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Chrysler Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 12). The item was again heard on May 9, 1978 (Item No. 3) and July 11, 1978 (Item No. 1). All hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Thirteen witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were two speakers in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters and communications supporting designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Chrysler Building, a stunning statement in the Art Deco style by architect William Van Alen, embodies the romantic essence of the New York City skyscraper. Built in 1928-30 for Walter P. Chrysler of the Chrysler Corporation, it was "dedicated to world commerce and industry."! The tallest building in the world when completed in 1930, it stood proudly on the New York skyline as a personal symbol of Walter Chrysler and the strength of his corporation. History of Construction The Chrysler Building had its beginnings in an office building project for William H. Reynolds, a real-estate developer and promoter and former New York State senator. Reynolds had acquired a long-term lease in 1921 on a parcel of property at Lexington Avenue and 42nd Street owned by the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.
    [Show full text]
  • 15-B William Van Alen, the Chrysler Building, 1926–1930
    WILLIAM VAN ALEN [1883–1954] 15b The Chrysler Building, 1926–1930 The Chrysler Building could only have been constructed in the To make the Chrysler Building distinct from others of its kind, Van competitive climate of Manhattan in the 1920s. The American Alen chose motifs appropriate to the machine age, particularly economy was flourishing, and there was not enough office space the automobile. The spire’s gleaming stainless steel cladding calls to go around; urban builders were encouraged to aim high. In to mind the polished chrome of a brand new car. Stylized 1926, Walter P. Chrysler, one of the wealthiest men in the auto- American eagle heads protrude from some corners of the build- motive industry, entered his bid in the unofficial competition to ing in playful reference to the gargoyles on Gothic cathedrals. build the tallest structure in New York City. He wanted an office Other corners are embellished with the winged forms of a building exalted enough to symbolize his own astounding ascent Chrysler radiator cap. One ornamental frieze incorporates a in the business world. Brooklyn-born architect William Van Alen, band of hubcaps. who had a reputation for progressive, flamboyant design, met If the exterior ornament enhances the modernity of the sky- Chrysler’s challenge with a seventy-seven-story building, the first scraper, the interior was designed to recall the distant past, and in the world to exceed a height of one thousand feet. positions the Chrysler Building among the wonders of the The pyramidal form of the Chrysler Building was dictated by a world.
    [Show full text]
  • True to the City's Teeming Nature, a New Breed of Multi-Family High Rises
    BY MEI ANNE FOO MAY 14, 2016 True to the city’s teeming nature, a new breed of multi-family high rises is fast cropping up around New York – changing the face of this famous urban jungle forever. New York will always be known as the land of many towers. From early iconic Art Deco splendours such as the Empire State Building and the Chrysler Building, to the newest symbol of resilience found in the One World Trade Center, there is no other city that can top the Big Apple’s supreme skyline. Except itself. Tall projects have been proposed and built in sizeable numbers over recent years. The unprecedented boom has been mostly marked by a rise in tall luxury residential constructions, where prior to the completion of One57 in 2014, there were less than a handful of super-tall skyscrapers in New York. Now, there are four being developed along the same street as One57 alone. Billionaire.com picks the city’s most outstanding multi-family high rises on the concrete horizon. 111 Murray Street This luxury residential tower developed by Fisher Brothers and Witkoff will soon soar some 800ft above Manhattan’s Tribeca neighborhood. Renderings of the condominium showcase a curved rectangular silhouette that looks almost round, slightly unfolding at the highest floors like a flared glass. The modern design is from Kohn Pedersen Fox. An A-team of visionaries has also been roped in for the project, including David Mann for it residence interiors; David Rockwell for amenities and public spaces and Edmund Hollander for landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 1 4 a N N U a L R E P O
    2014 ANNUAL REPORT 12 4 3 5 6 7 Performance. Perspective. 9 8 10 11 12 SUSTAINABILITY MATRIX Empire One Grand 1400 112 West 250 West State Central Broadway 34th Street 57th Street Building Place Whole Building Energy Retrofit Analysis (Replicate ESB Model) Whole Building Energy Retrofit Implementation Low-e window retrofit High Performance Tenant Installation Required per Lease Submetering of All New Tenant Spaces Utilities Billed by Submetering (as installed) Building Management System (BMS) Status (I) BMS in place Hybrid/package (II) No BMS in place HVAC (III) Partial BMS in place No central HVAC No central HVAC Energy Star Certification Waste Management/Recycling (I) Construction Debris (II) Tenant Waste (III) Separate Electronic Recycling (IV) Single Stream Recycling Green Cleaning Products and Practices Green Pest Management Products and Practices Demand Response/Peak Load Shaving Sustainability Committee Annual & Long Term Sustainability Targets Leadership & Sharing 13 14 1333 1350 1359 501 Seventh First MerrittView 10 Bank 500 Metro Broadway Broadway Broadway Avenue Stamford Street Mamaroneck Center Place Underway Pending Underway Underway Pending No central HVAC No central HVAC No central HVAC To Our Fellow Stockholders: It is our pleasure to present Empire State Realty Trust’s 2014 annual report. In 2014 we delivered on the goals we stated during the launch of ESRT. Our strong and increasingly flexible balance sheet supported creation of value through redevelopment of our existing portfolio and funded growth through acquisitions of our option properties. Our team deployed its talent, commitment, and capacity to execute. Redevelopment and Tenant Upgrades Continue During 2014, we completed 239 leases for a total of 785,000 square feet across our entire portfolio, and achieved starting cash rents per square foot 20.2% above the previous fully escalated cash rent.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire State Building Announces Launch of Destination Midtown App
    EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ANNOUNCES LAUNCH OF DESTINATION MIDTOWN APP New York, NY – March 13, 2017 –The Empire State Building (ESB) today announced the launch of the official Destination Midtown app. The Destination Midtown Alliance (DMA) is a coalition of partners from the most iconic businesses and attractions in Midtown Manhattan. DMA has created an app available for free on iTunes and Google Play. The interactive Destination Midtown app provides visitors with a user-friendly, selectively curated itinerary to iconic attractions and hidden gems located in Midtown Manhattan, the Heart of New York City. Featuring insider tips, suggested itineraries, events, and themed walking tours such as “Fashion Intro” and “Family Fun,” the app enhances the visitor’s overall experience of Midtown, all within a 15-minute walk of the center of Manhattan, the Empire State Building. Offering a variety of services ranging from dining, shopping, entertainment, and sightseeing, the Alliance includes the following partners: New York Public Library Habanero Blues Eataly NYC Flatiron The Morgan Library and Museum B&H Photo Langham Place New York Circle Line Sightseeing Cruises Macy’s Herald Square Madison Square Garden Bryant Park Corp. Grand Central Partnership 230-Fifth Grand Central Terminal Flat Iron BID Tacombi Radisson Martinique Hotel 34th Street Partnership Stella 34 Trattoria Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum Nick & Stef’s Steakhouse Mood Fabrics Madame Tussauds NYC State Grill and Bar Garment District Alliance Grand Hyatt New York Reichenbach Hall Radio City Music Hall “Midtown is the most important place for a tourist visiting New York City. With its early opening and late closing shops, restaurants, entertainment, and attractions, it allows visitors to fully immerse themselves in Midtown and all it has to offer.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT 4 – SKYSCRAPERS Fiche De Travail Consignes De Travail : À L'aide Des Informations De La Fiche « Document 4- Skys
    DOCUMENT 4 – SKYSCRAPERS Fiche de travail Consignes de travail : à l’aide des informations de la fiche « document 4- skyscrapers-tableaux informations », complétez cette fiche de travail. LE SUPERLATIF – grammaire – les règles On utilise le superlatif pour comparer et montrer l’élément qui est supérieur aux autres. 1. les adjectifs courts (1 syllabe) : 3. Attention : pour les adjectifs terminés the + adjectif court + -est par « -y », le « -y » devient « -iest » : exemple : fast à the fastest exemple : happy à the happiest 4. pour les adjectifs longs : 2. pour les adjectifs courts d’une syllabe terminés par une consonne et dont the + most + adjectif long l’orthographe de fin de mot est consonne-voyelle-consonne (cvc), il exemple: intelligent à the most intelligent faut doubler la consonne finale : 5. EXCEPTIONS : exemple : big à the biggest (cvc) good à the best Mais ATTENTION ! low à the lowest bad à the worst 1. EXERCICE - Quelles sont les règles du superlatif à appliquer aux adjectifs suivants ? Mets ces adjectifs au superlatif et classe-les dans le tableau selon la règle qu’ils suivent. ** tableau avec la traduction des adjectifs en fin de fiche. extensive hot fat heavy recent nice great short beautiful cold bad gigantic tall long good dangerous low noisy crazy old small impressive high elegant tiny artistic big Adjectifs courts Adjectifs courts Adjectifs courts Adjectifs longs exceptions en « -y » (Consonne finale doublée) the longest 2. EXERCICE – maintenant applique les règles du comparatif et du superlatif pour comparer les 3 éléments proposés à partir du « document 4-skyscrapers-tableaux informations », comme dans l’exemple suivant.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Technical Problems in Modern Super-Slim High-Rise Residential Buildings
    Budownictwo i Architektura 20(1) 2021, 83-116 DOI: 10.35784/bud-arch.2141 Received: 09.07.2020; Revised: 19.11.2020; Accepted: 15.12.2020; Avaliable online: 09.02.2020 © 2020 Budownictwo i Architektura Orginal Article This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 Analysis of technical problems in modern super-slim high-rise residential buildings Jerzy Szołomicki1, Hanna Golasz-Szołomicka2 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering; Wrocław University of Science and Technology; 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego st., 50-370 Wrocław; Poland, [email protected] 0000-0002-1339-4470 2 Faculty of Architecture; Wrocław University of Science and Technology; 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego St., 50-370 Wrocław; Poland [email protected] 0000-0002-1125-6162 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present a new skyscraper typology which has developed over the recent years – super-tall and slender, needle-like residential towers. This trend appeared on the construction market along with the progress of advanced struc- tural solutions and the high demand for luxury apartments with spectacular views. Two types of constructions can be distinguished within this typology: ultra-luxury super-slim towers with the exclusivity of one or two apartments per floor (e.g. located in Manhattan, New York) and other slender high-rise towers, built in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong, Bangkok, and Melbourne, among others, which have multiple apartments on each floor. This paper presents a survey of selected slender high-rise buildings, where structural improvements in tall buildings developed over the recent decade are considered from the architectural and structural view.
    [Show full text]
  • Vinoly-Profile Final.Pdf
    Rafael Viñoly The Art of Looking ARCHITECT OF 277 FIFTH AVENUE The first thing you notice is his glasses. One pair perches on his head. Three more dangle around his neck like necklaces. He explains that one pair is for distance; the second is for reading; the third is for looking at the computer; and the fourth is for playing the piano. He is someone who needs to be, in his words, “precise about what I need to look at.” He is wearing a dark blue blazer and a silk tie. He is energetic, tousled, and boyish—anything but formal. Even while sitting, he seems to be on the move. He acknowledges with a grin that although his glasses are functional, they are also distinct: a way for people to remember him. 9 VIÑOLY’S FOUR PAIRS OF GLASSES He is the rare architect who can shift perspective, view the world through different lenses, and maintain his focus. An architect is only as good as his vision. The glasses are also a metaphor for different styles and cultures of Upper and that “this kind of layout is very rare.” Each Rafael Viñoly’s life and work. In the course Lower Fifth Avenue. Viñoly then references residence has at least two exposures; some of his career, he has moved fluidly between the development of SoHo, which occurred in have three; and the building culminates in designing concert halls and airports, the late 1960s and early 1970s, when artists apartments with four full exposures, offering museums and residences. He has designed were looking for spaces they could afford expansive views from every side.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes to Dip in Year-On-Year Completions
    CTBUH Year in Review: Tall Trends of 2020 Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes To Dip in Year-On-Year Completions Abstract In 2020, the tall building industry constructed 106 buildings of 200 meters’ height or greater, a 20 percent decline from 2019, when 133 such buildings were completed.* The decline can be partly attributed to work stoppages and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report provides analysis and commentary on global and regional trends underway during an eventful year. Research Project Kindly Sponsored by: Note: Please refer to Tall Buildings in Numbers—The Global Tall Building Picture: Impact of 2020 in conjunction with this Schindler paper, pages 48–49. *The study sets a minimum threshold of 200 meters’ height because of the completeness of data available on buildings of that height. Keywords: Construction, COVID-19, Development, Height, Hotel, Megatall, Mixed-Use, Office, Residential, Supertall Introduction This is the second year in a row in which Center (New York City) completed, that the the completion figure declined. In 2019, tallest building of the year was in the For many people, 2020 will be remembered the reasons for this were varied, though United States. as the year that nothing went to plan. The the change in the tall building climate in same can be said for the tall building China, with public policy statements This is also the first year since 2014 in which industry. As a global pandemic took hold in against needless production of there has not been at least one building the first quarter, numerous projects around exceedingly tall buildings, constituted a taller than 500 meters completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Towers
    Common Towers What is a Common Tower? A common tower hoist complex is a temporary structure that serves a building with up to three dual hoists, creating a compact and efficient footprint. Why Use a Common Tower? A common tower is the most efficient configuration for projects requiring multiple hoists on site. By increasing flexibility in layout, Empire State Building common towers make multiple hoists a possibility within limited spaces. Benefits of a Common Tower Centralized access complex: Utilizing a common tower allows hoists and temporary staircases to serve the building from one concentrated area, maximizing access and efficiency. The centralized access location benefits the construction site and reduces the impact on the building as well. Minimum impact on curtain wall: By locating landing gates and hoist ties on the faces of the common tower, only discreet tower- to-building ties are needed on the face of the building. This reduces Hudson Yards coordination with curtain wall installation and is especially beneficial for existing buildings where removing the façade would be difficult. Versatile hoist positioning: Common towers free hoists from directly serving the building line, allowing for creative solutions to challenging site staging that straight-on hoist geometry cannot address. Adaptable design capabilities: Infill extensions can be added to access complex building setbacks. Additionally, overhead protection for pedestrian traffic at grade can be incorporated within the common tower layout. Modular and scalable: Common towers are built on site with modular components. Tower leg options include SystemsTM Scaffold, hoist mast sections and specialized aluminum extrusions. Central Park Tower Common Tower Footprint While the standard common tower is approximately 16’ x 16’, the size can be customized to suit project needs.
    [Show full text]
  • New York: the Ultimate Skyscraper Laboratory
    Tall Building Locations in New York City Tall Buildings in Numbers The recent skyscraper boom has been characterized by an increase in luxury residential construction, an increase in slenderness aspect ratios, and substantial construction in new locations away from Lower and Midtown Manhattan, in areas once considered “fringe,” such as Brooklyn, Queens and Jersey City. The research below examines the function and location of tall New York: The Ultimate Skyscraper Laboratory buildings over 100 meters, recently completed or under construction,3 in the New York City region4, with supertall buildings represented by larger dots. When construction of 111 West 3 4 57th Street (438 m) completes A timeline of skyscraper completions in New York uncannily Study of 100 m+ buildings in the New York City regionQueens – 20 in 2018, it will challenge the (2%) resembles the boom and bust cycles of the United States in QueensJersey – 20 City – 21 VIA 57 WEST (142 m), planned boundaries of engineering with Jersey City – 21 (2%) (3%) Bronx – 10 for completion in 2015, is a a width-to-height ratio of almost Upon completion in the 20th and early 21st centuries. The most active year was Hotel – 52 Other – 8 (3%) Brooklyn – 33 Bronx – 10 (1%) housing project designed as a 1:25, using 15,000 PSI concrete 2015, 432 Park Avenue hybrid between the European (426 m) will become the Hotel – 52 (6%)Other – 8 (1%) Brooklyn – 33 (4%) (1%) and a pendulum damper to 1931, when the fi nal excesses of the Roaring ‘20s were thrown perimeter block and a world’s tallest residential (6%) (1%) (4%) achieve this feat.
    [Show full text]