Branch News What’S Been Going On
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Lawtalk Issue
ISSUE 928 · MAY 2019 Finding a match Could more be done to match lawyers with the right pro bono clients? Tania Sharkey The Arbitration The benefits of Retiring from and the Pacific Amendment Act working flexibly practice Lawyers 2019: Further for mental health Association refinement and wellbeing Page 22 Page 28 Page 50 Page 81 Our commitment At MAS, we’re committed to doing what we can to make a positive impact on the health and wellbeing of future generations of New Zealanders, and to a more sustainable country. It’s why we’ve implemented a socially responsible investing approach across $1.4 billion of superannuation funds and insurance reserves and do not invest in the manufacture and sale of armaments, tobacco, or the exploration, extraction, refining and processing fossil fuels. Talk to us about our socially responsible Retirement Savings and KiwiSaver plans today by calling 0800 800 627 or visit mas.co.nz Winner at the 2019 Australian Financial Review’s Client Choice Awards. We are delighted to have won three awards: • Best Australasian Professional Services firm (A$50-200m) • Best Australasian Law & Related Services firm (A$50-200m) • Best Australasian provider to Government & Community. AUCKLAND WELLINGTON CHRISTCHURCH buddlefindlay.com STUDY TO BE A LEGAL EXECUTIVE Competition • Developed in conjunction Matters2019 with the Law Society Competition and Regulation • Part-time & full-time options • Auckland Central Campus Conference Pullman Hotel · Auckland · 25 and 26 July Register now for your chance to hear from some of the world’s -
Connector June 2018
NEWS ‘N VIEWS FROM THE GROUP | JUNE 2018 CHAIRMAN’S UPDATE Welcome back to all our members and their families who attended our fantastic Plumbing World Funtimes in Fiji convention in May, and I trust that everyone is now adjusting to the challenges of the early onset of our New Zealand winter. Conditions across the country are already treacherous, so I ask everyone in our NZPM, Metrix and Plumbing World businesses, and all of our co-operative members to please take extra care—especially on the roads—this winter. It was great to see over 230 people enjoying the events and camaraderie that our incredible Fiji shareholder trip offered, including around 100 members celebrating their first of what I’m sure will be many Plumbing World overseas conventions. With the next convention announced as Beijing in 2020, I expect that we’ll again see a big turnout, as shareholders continue to experience those unique and special benefits that membership of our co-operative offers. During the convention we delivered a business session where I outlined details of the NZPM Group’s strategic and co-operative focus, together with updates around our financial performance, the forecast rebate dividend and our Future Governance programme. Following this Rob Kidd talked about three key aspects of running your business in this modern era, which is becoming increasingly digitally and technologically challenging for us all. For those who didn’t make it to Fiji, all of this information together with an opportunity for you to ask questions or offer feedback about your co-operative will be provided during our forthcoming annual roadshows. -
Bay of Plenty Region Passenger and Freight Rail FINAL Report May 2019
1 | P a g e Bay of Plenty Passenger and Freight Rail Phase 1 Investigation Report May 2019 Contents Page Contents Page ......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 Overall Findings and Future Opportunities ................................................................................. 6 2.1 Overall Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Future Opportunities ............................................................................................................ 10 3.0 Bay of Plenty Passenger and Freight Rail Investigation 2019 ................................................... 13 3.1 Phase 1 Investigation ............................................................................................................ 13 3.2 Stakeholders / Partners ........................................................................................................ 13 3.3 New Zealand Transport Agency Business Case Approach .................................................... 14 3.4 Bay of Plenty Rail Strategy 2007 ........................................................................................... 14 4.0 National Strategy and Policy Settings ...................................................................................... -
Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page
Individual Submissions J - Z Contents Page Please note: As some submitters did not provide their first names they have been ordered in the submissions received list under their title. These submitters are as follows: o Mr Burgess is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr o Mrs Davey is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Dromgool is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mrs Peters is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mrs o Mr Ripley is ordered in the submissions received list under ‗M‘ for Mr We apologise for any confusion the above ordering of submissions may have caused. If your submission is not displayed here, contains incorrect information or is missing some parts, please email us on [email protected] or contact Mathew Stewart on (09) 447 4831 Sub # Submitter Page 851 J Dromgool 13 870 Jacob Phillips 13 15 Jacob Samuel 13 178 Jacqueline Anne Church 13 685 Jacqui Fisher 13 100 James Houston 13 854 James Lockhart 13 302 Jamie Revell 13 361 Jan Heijs 14 372 Jane Blow 14 309 Jane Briant-Turner 14 482 Janet Hunter 14 662 Janet Pates 14 656 Janie Flavell 14 634 Jarrod Ford (NB: we apologise if this name is incorrect, we were 14 unable to clearly decipher the writing) 718 Jason Lafaele 14 605 Jaydene Haku 15 746 Jeanette Collie 15 149 Jeanette Valerie Cooper 15 177 Jennifer Collett 15 681 Jennifer Olson 15 818 Jennifer Preston 15 832 Jenny TeWake 15 1 Sub # Submitter Page 373 Jeremy Lees-Green 15 85 Jesse McKenzie 16 843 Jessica Currie -
History of the Rotorua Branch of the Royal Society of New Zealand
9 June 2017 History of the Rotorua Branch of the Royal Society of New Zealand The Branch was started in 1952, on the basis of meeting two conditions, namely embarking upon an approved project (getting a proper Rotorua Museum established), and starting a library. There was heavy involvement of the Branch in the Museum Project, through Jim Healy’s contribution to setting up a volcanological exhibit. From early on the Branch had a History Section, with Don Stafford heavily involved. The Section was instrumental in creating an exhibit on pioneering housing and clothing for the Museum, that being a personal project of Mostyn Thompson’s. When Rowland Burdon came on board in 1969 Hugo Hinds was President, with Gordon George (Vice President), John Campbell, Jim Healy, Geoff Fish, Eric Bodley (Treasurer) Selwyn Cooper and Jan Gifford on the Council. Hugo had been preceded by Dr Jack Doyle and was succeeded in order by Gordon George, then John Campbell, Dr Allan Pullar, and myself. Membership had reached an ebb that threatened the viability if the Branch but was boosted by vigorous recruiting among scientists at the Forest Research Institute. Nine meetings were held per year, aiming at a broad spread of topics except for a bias towards local scientific research. Rowland was secretary 1969-72; President 1978-80, 1990-8; and councillor almost continuously since 1969. The Museum was opened in 1970 in the Tudor Towers building, formerly the Government Bathhouse, funded by the City Council which then blocked any further input from the Branch, although the Branch continued to hold its meetings there for some years. -
Area Council Branch Start Time Action Venue
Area Council Branch Start time Action Venue Monday 12 November 2018 Auckland Auckland 7.30am Rally for Kohimarama and St Thomas Schools Kohimarama School, 112 Kohimarama Rd, Kohimarama 7.30am Rally for Meadowbank and Mt Carmel Schools Meadowbank Shopping Centre, 35-47 St Johns Rd, St Johns 7.30am Rally for Cornwall Park School Intersection of Greenlane West and Wheturangi Rds, Greenlane 7.30am Rally for Epsom Normal School Cnr King George and Gillies Aves, Epsom 7.30am Rally for St Michael’s and Newmarket Schools Cnr Broadway and Remuera Rd, Newmarket 7.30am Rally for Victoria Avenue School Victoria Avenue School, 282 Victoria Ave, Remuera 7.30am Rally for Westmere School Meola Rd Roundabout, Westmere 7.30am Rally for Bayfield, Marist Herne Bay and West End/Jervois Rd Ponsonby Primary Schools Roundabout, Herne Bay 7.30am Rally for Ponsonby Intermediate Cnr Jervois & College Hill Rds, Ponsonby 7.30am Rally for Richmond Rd School Cnr Richmond & Ponsonby Rds, Ponsonby 7.30am Rally for Freemans Bay and Kadimah schools Union Street Motorway Interchange 7.30am Rally for Newton Central and St Joseph’s Intersection of Great North Schools and Ponsonby Rds 7.30am Rally for Point Chevalier and St Francis Schools Intersection of Carrington/Pt Chev/Great North Rds 7.30am Rally for Grey Lynn School and Pasadena Intersection of Great North Intermediate and St Lukes Rds 7.30am Rally for Mt Albert and Marist Mt Albert Schools Intersection of New North and St Lukes Rds 7.30am Rally for Waterview Primary School Waterview School, 16 Herdman St, Waterview -
Restoration of the Rimutaka Incline Railway Development Proposal
Restoration of the Rimutaka Incline Railway Development Proposal and Environment Management Plan: Maymorn to Summit Executive Summary Rimutaka Incline Railway Heritage Trust November 2011. Photo: S class locomotive and train at Summit circa 1880. William Williams, Alexander Turnbull Library Page 1 of 46 Development Proposal and Environment Management Plan v2 Preface This document is an Executive Summary form of the Development Proposal and Assessment of Environmental Effects, which canvasses the issues which are considered to be important in relation to deciding whether approval should be given to reinstating the Rimutaka Incline Railway. This document provides a summary, via answers to key questions, concerning elements of the proposal and the main environmental, planning, design and construction issues. Information shown on maps and plans in this document are indicative only. Reference should be made to detailed maps and plans where referenced. Page 2 of 46 Development Proposal and Environment Management Plan v2 Contents Restoration of the Rimutaka Incline Railway .................................................................................. 1 Development Proposal and Environment Management Plan: Maymorn to Summit ....................... 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Preface ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Contents -
12-105 Back from Proof Reader
Inquiry RO-2012-105: Unsafe recovery from wrong-route at Wiri Junction, 31 August 2012 The Transport Accident Investigation Commission is an independent Crown entity established to determine the circumstances and causes of accidents and incidents with a view to avoiding similar occurrences in the future. Accordingly it is inappropriate that reports should be used to assign fault or blame or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The Commission may make recommendations to improve transport safety. The cost of implementing any recommendation must always be balanced against its benefits. Such analysis is a matter for the regulator and the industry. These reports may be reprinted in whole or in part without charge, providing acknowledgement is made to the Transport Accident Investigation Commission. Final Report Rail inquiry RO-2012-105 Unsafe recovery from wrong-route at Wiri Junction, 31 August 2012 Approved for publication: April 2016 Transport Accident Investigation Commission About the Transport Accident Investigation Commission The Transport Accident Investigation Commission (Commission) is a standing commission of inquiry and an independent Crown entity responsible for inquiring into maritime, aviation and rail accidents and incidents for New Zealand, and co-ordinating and co-operating with other accident investigation organisations overseas. The principal purpose of its inquiries is to determine the circumstances and causes of occurrences with a view to avoiding similar occurrences in the future. Its purpose is not to ascribe blame to any person or agency or to pursue (or to assist an agency to pursue) criminal, civil or regulatory action against a person or agency. -
Washout Puts Gisborne/Napier Line in Jeopardy 2 Contents Editorial ISSUE 2 • JUNE 2012
THE Transport Worker The journal of the RMTU NZ's largest specialist transport union JUNE 2012 Washout puts Gisborne/Napier line in jeopardy 2 CONTENTS EDITORIAL ISSUE 2 • JUNE 2012 4 ASSET SALES The case for asset sales gets steadily thinner and less convincing. Wayne Butson HIKOI AGAINST ASSET SALES 11 General secretary RMTU TAP cracks appearing HE much vaunted KiwiRail Turnaround Plan (TAP), released with great fanfare in 2010, has had its first major review and the Union and delegates The RMTU's flag flies proudly over the have been briefed on the outcome. The detail of the review is commercially huge demo at Parliament. Tsensitive and not for release, therefore, we cannot actually quote any of it. However, there are a number of factors which are in the public domain and widely 21 MATANGI MIRACLE known to us all. Two years after the plan was released we know that there have been landslides, earthquakes, droughts, floods and a mining tragedy which has delivered a very lethargic New Zealand economy. We also know that the TAP was based upon a $1.1 billion support package of which only $750m was committed by the Government there is a shortfall of $400m or thereabouts. Lethargic economy Wellington's ancient EE units finally The lethargic economy has baffled Treasury and its ability to forecast the Crown replaced. accounts’ income and expenditure – out of which KiwiRail has fared no better, as stated in the Annual Report 2011. All the KiwiRail budget numbers are inaccurate for all divisions – it is just a debate, by division, of by how much. -
Auckland Metro Rail Network Electrification
AUCKLAND METRO RAIL NETWORK ELECTRIFICATION Heritage Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 3 2.0 Introduction 4 3.0 Heritage Significance 6 4.0 Western Line (Newmarket–Swanson) 12 5.0 Britomart–Penrose–Onehunga 18 6.0 Penrose–Papakura (including Manukau Branch) 26 7.0 Eastern Diversion (Britomart–Westfield) 32 8.0 Conclusion 35 9.0 Appendices APPENDIX 1: Identification of Groups / 37 Individuals / Stakeholders for Consultation APPENDIX 2: Historical Chronology 38 APPENDIX 3: Policy for Government 66 Departments’ Management of Historic Heritage APPENDIX 4: Draft Areas of Visual Sensitivity 75 for Discussion APPENDIX 5: Map of Study Area 89 APPENDIX 6: Map of Railway Lines 90 APPENDIX 7: Items of Potential Significance (P*) 91 to be Altered or Demolished AUCKLAND METRO-RAIL ELECTRIFICATION: Heritage Assessment Page 2 of 92 1.0 Executive Summary This heritage assessment has been prepared to identify the built rail heritage in the Auckland Metro Rail network and to understand the heritage issues associated with the electrification of the network. It is supported and underpinned by the Policy for Government Departments’ Management of Historic Heritage 2004. The overall heritage significance of the various lines is discussed and the study further identifies 59 heritage ‘items’ including stations and associated structures on a 3 tiered scale according to their identified (I), potential (P) and adjacent significance (A), (see Section 3.0) Based on the historical chronology, (see APPENDIX 2), the assessment follows in consecutive order along the rail lines as they developed historically, section 4.0 Western Line, section 5.0 Britomart-Penrose- Onehunga, section 6.0 Penrose-Papakura (including Manukau Branch), and section 7.0 Eastern Diversion (Britomart-Westfield). -
Auckland Air Emissions Inventory 2016 – Transport (Revised)
Auckland Air Emissions Inventory 2016 – Transport (Revised) Surekha Sridhar and Jayne Metcalfe March 2019 Technical Report 2018/016-2 Auckland air emissions inventory 2016 – transport (revised) March 2019 Technical Report 2018/016-2 Surekha Sridhar Jayne Metcalfe Emission Impossible Ltd Auckland Council Technical Report 2018/016-2 ISSN 2230-4525 (Print) ISSN 2230-4533 (Online) ISBN 978-1-98-858940-4 (Print) ISBN 978-1-98-858941-1 (PDF) This report has been peer reviewed by the Peer Review Panel. Review completed on 20 July 2018 Reviewed by two reviewers Approved for Auckland Council publication by: Name: Eva McLaren Position: Manager, Research and Evaluation (RIMU) Name: Matt Hope Position: Manager, Hydrology and Environmental Data Management (RIMU) Date: 21 March 2019 Recommended citation Sridhar, S and Metcalfe, J (2019). Auckland air emissions inventory 2016 – transport (revised). Prepared by Emission Impossible Ltd for Auckland Council. Auckland Council technical report, TR2018/016-2 Note This report corrects errors in the calculation of road dust (PM10 and PM2.5) from unsealed roads (Section 6.1) and replaces the version published in July 2018, Auckland Council technical report, TR2018/016. © 2019 Auckland Council This publication is provided strictly subject to Auckland Council’s copyright and other intellectual property rights (if any) in the publication. Users of the publication may only access, reproduce and use the publication, in a secure digital medium or hard copy, for responsible genuine non-commercial purposes relating to personal, public service or educational purposes, provided that the publication is only ever accurately reproduced and proper attribution of its source, publication date and authorship is attached to any use or reproduction. -
Names & Opening & Closing Dates of Railway Stations
Names & Opening & Closing Dates of Railway Stations in New Zealand 1863 to 2010 Researched & Written by Juliet Scoble for the Rail Heritage Trust of New Zealand JRS/291 © Juliet Scoble 4/2010 © Rail Heritage Trust of New Zealand 4/2010 Introduction This document lists the names of railway stations and the dates they were opened and closed. Included are the dates stations were opened for goods and or passenger traffic before the lines were officially opened or handed over to the Working Railways Department. Often the Public Works Department would run goods and passenger services whilst the list was still in their custody. These services were operated by the Public Works Department's ballast engine. Goods were carried in Working Railway's wagons. Occasionally a passenger car or covered wagon fitted with seats were provided, but most times passengers were carried in Public Works' ballast wagons. I have included the stations on the lines owned by the government railways, and private lines where government rolling stock was run thereon. This is an on-going work as I am still looking through files and am finding more names and other information to include in this document. Revised versions will be issued from time to time, the frequency depending upon the new information I find. Juliet Scoble 4/2010 Acknowledgements Most information has been obtained from the Rail Heritage Trust's Station Archive created and researched by Juliet Scoble, and from research specifically undertaken for this document. Additional information supplied by: Auckland