DOCSLIB.ORG

The Utilisation of Fur-Bearing Animals in the British Isles a Zooarchaeological Hunt for Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Utilisation of Fur-Bearing Animals in the British Isles a Zooarchaeological Hunt for Data The utilisation of fur-bearing animals in the British Isles A zooarchaeological hunt for data E.H. Fairnell MSc in Zooarchaeology The University of York Department of Archaeology (Incorporating the former Institute for Advanced Architectural Studies) September 2003 ‘There was nothing Lucy liked so much as the smell and feel of fur’ … C.S. Lewis (1953) The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe Abstract E.H. Fairnell The utilisation of fur-bearing animals in the British Isles: a zooarchaeological hunt for data MSC in Zooarchaeology viii prelims + 126pp (including 9 tables, 53 figures and 57 maps) + an appendix of 63pp + CD-ROM Few studies of the use of animals for their fur seem to be based on analysis of the remains of the species themselves. A database of zooarchaeological records of fur-bearing species was compiled from a systematic literature search. The species considered were bear, badger, beaver, cat, dog, ferret, fox, hare, pine marten, polecat, otter, rabbit, seal, squirrel, stoat and weasel. Preliminary analyses of data for England and Scotland seem to suggest a consistent use of fairly local resources to meet practical and fashionable demands. A few records from the 10th–17th centuries may show bulk processing of pelts, but they could be self- sufficient measures to save costs within the context of an expensive fur trade. Contents List of tables v List of figures vi List of maps vii Appendix and CD-ROM particulars viii 1 Introduction 1 The background 1 The present study 6 2 The role of zooarchaeology in identifying evidence of utilising a species for its fur 7 The process of skinning 7 Species identification 8 Cut marks 9 Element distribution 10 Other sources of evidence of skinning 13 Summary 14 3 Methodology 15 Source of the data set 15 Data recording 16 Data analysis 20 Summary 21 4 The initial analyses 22 The data 22 The species 22 The sites 23 Evidence of human use 23 Evidence of utilisation of fur 23 Summary 26 5 Analysis of when evidence of skinning occurs 27 Bear 28 Seal 29 Beaver 30 Squirrel 32 Polecat and ferret 33 Stoat and weasel 35 Pine marten 36 Otter 38 Badger 39 Fox 41 Hare 43 Rabbit 45 Cat 47 Dog 49 Summary 50 6 Analysis of where evidence of skinning occurs 52 Bear 52 Seal 53 Beaver 54 Squirrel 55 Polecat, ferret, stoat, weasel and pine marten 56 Otter and badger 57 Fox 59 Hare 60 Rabbit 61 Cat 62 Dog 63 Summary 64 7 Discussion and concluding remarks 65 Utilisation of fur-bearing species in the British Isles 65 The role of zooarchaeology 71 Application of the database and further research 72 Acknowledgements 73 References 74 Tables 88 Figures 92 Maps 108 Appendix 127 CD-ROM Inside back cover List of tables Table 1: Cultures referred to in the records in the database 88 Table 2: Definition of the time spans used for analysis of the database 88 Table 3: List of species identified in the master database, and number of records 89 Table 4: The species code allocated and number of records for those species that were analysed further 89 Table 5: The location of the sites from which the records came 90 Table 6: The site type classifications used for analysis 90 Table 7: A summary showing the number of records with some cut marks indicated, not necessarily indicative of skinning 91 Table 8: A summary showing the number of records with an element distribution that could be indicative of skinning 91 Table 9: A summary showing the numbers of records that seem to show evidence of skinning, based on analysis of element distribution, cut marks 91 v List of figures Figure 1: NISP of all bear records, with skinning records indicated as individual points 92 Figure 2: %total NISP of all bear records, with skinning records indicated as individual points 92 Figure 3: NISP of all seal records, with skinning records indicated as individual points 92 Figure 4: %total NISP of all seal records, with skinning records indicated as individual points 92 Figure 5: NISP of beaver skinning records 93 Figure 6: %total NISP of beaver skinning records 93 Figure 7: NISP of all beaver records 93 Figure 8: %total NISP of all beaver records 93 Figure 9: NISP of squirrel skinning records 94 Figure 10: %total NISP of squirrel skinning records 94 Figure 11: NISP of all squirrel records, excluding the record for The Bedern, York 94 Figure 12: %total NISP of all squirrel records, excluding the record for The Bedern, York 94 Figure 13: NISP of all polecat and ferret records, with the skinning records indicated as individual points 95 Figure 14: %total NISP of all polecat and ferret records, with the skinning records indicated as individual points 95 Figure 15: NISP of all stoat and weasel records, with the skinning records indicated as individual points 95 Figure 16: %total NISP of all stoat and weasel records, with the skinning records indicated as individual points 95 Figure 17: NISP of all pine marten records, with the skinning records indicated as individual points 96 Figure 18: %total NISP of all pine marten records, with the skinning records indicated as individual points 96 Figure 19: The relative contribution of each of the mustelid species, excluding the otter and badger, across time 97 Figure 20: NISP of otter skinning records 98 Figure 21: %total NISP of otter skinning records 98 Figure 22: NISP of all otter records 98 Figure 23: %total NISP of all otter records 98 Figure 24: NISP of badger skinning records 99 Figure 25: %total NISP of badger skinning records 99 Figure 26: NISP of all badger records 99 Figure 27: %total NISP of all badger records 99 Figure 28: NISP of fox skinning records 100 Figure 29: %total NISP of fox skinning records 100 Figure 30: NISP of all fox records 100 Figure 31: %total NISP of all fox records 100 Figure 32: NISP of hare skinning records 101 Figure 33: %total NISP of hare skinning records 101 Figure 34: NISP of all hare records 101 Figure 35: %total NISP of all hare records 101 Figure 36: Detail of the NISP of all hare records 102 Figure 37: Detail of the %total NISP of all hare records 102 Figure 38: NISP of all rabbit records 103 Figure 39: NISP of the non-intrusive rabbit records, with one skinning record highlighted 103 Figure 40: Detail of the NISP of the assumed non-intrusive rabbit records from the database, excluding the outliers, and with two skinning records highlighted 103 Figure 41: %total NISP of the assumed non-intrusive rabbit records from the database, with two skinning records highlighted 103 Figure 42: NISP of cat skinning records 104 Figure 43: %total NISP of cat skinning records 104 Figure 44: NISP of all cat records 104 Figure 45: %total NISP of all cat 104 Figure 46: Detail of the NISP of all cat records 105 Figure 47: Detail of the %total NISP of all cat records 105 Figure 48: NISP of dog skinning records 106 Figure 49: %total NISP of dog skinning records 106 Figure 50: NISP of all dog records skinning records 106 Figure 51: %total NISP of all dog records skinning records 106 Figure 52: Detail of the NISP of all dog records skinning records 107 Figure 53: Detail of the %total NISP of all dog records skinning records 107 vi List of maps Map 1: Location of all the records from the database 108 Map 2: Location of records from the database identified as including evidence of skinning 108 Map 3: Detail of Map 1, showing the location of the more northerly records 108 Map 4: Detail of Map 2, showing the location of the more northerly skinning records 108 Map 5: Location of bear records for all time periods, and site type of skinning records 109 Map 6: Location of seal records for all time periods, and site type of skinning records 109 Map 7: Location of beaver records for all time periods, and site type of skinning records 109 Map 8: Location of squirrel records for all time periods, and site type of skinning records 109 Map 9: Location of mustelid records allocated to the Palaeolithic and Neolithic time periods 110 Map 10: Location of mustelid records allocated to the Iron Age time periods, and site type of skinning records 110 Map 11: Location of mustelid records allocated to the 2nd–9th centuries, and site type of skinning records 110 Map 12: Location of mustelid records allocated to the 10th–15th centuries, and site type of skinning records 110 Map 13: Location of mustelid records allocated to the 16th–21st centuries 111 Map 14: Location of badger and otter records allocated to the Palaeolithic and Neolithic time periods 112 Map 15: Location of badger and otter records allocated to the Iron Age time periods, and site type of skinning records 112 Map 16: Location of badger and otter records allocated to the 2nd–9th centuries, and site type of skinning records 112 Map 17: Location of badger and otter records allocated to the 10th–15th centuries, and site type of skinning records 112 Map 18: Location of badger and otter records allocated to the 16th–21st centuries, and site type of skinning records 113 Map 19: Location of fox records allocated to the Palaeolithic, Neolithic and Bronze Age time periods, and site type of skinning records 114 Map 20: Location of fox records allocated to the Iron Age time periods, and site type of skinning records 114 Map 21: Location of fox records allocated to the 2nd–5th centuries, and site type of skinning records 114 Map 22: Location of fox records allocated to the 6th–9th centuries 114 Map 23: Location of fox records allocated to the 10th–15th centuries, and site type of skinning records 115 Map 24: Location of fox records allocated to the 16th–19th centuries 115 Map 25: Location of hare records allocated to the Palaeolithic, Neolithic and Bronze Age
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CCS Study EMS 90-0058 Migration of Northern Fur Seal (Callorhinus
    CCS Study EMS 90-0058 Migration of northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) pups in the Bering Sea. Final Report. Timothy J. Ragen and Paul K. Dayton Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093 September 1990 Minerals Management SeNice Department of the Interior Alaska CCS Region 949 East 366th Avenue Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4302 Purchase Order No. <~ --.-J ● Migration of northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) pups in the Bering Sea. Final Report. Timothy J. Ragen and Paul K. Dayton Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093 September 1990 This study was funded in part by the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Region of the Minerals Management Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., under Purchase Order No. 12523. This report has been reviewed by the Minerals Management Service and has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the view and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. AUTHORS AND RESPONSIBILITIES This report was written by Timothy J. Ragen, under the supervision of Paul K. Dayton. Dr. Ragen and George A. Antonelisr Jr., National Marine Mammal Laboratory, conducted the field portion of this study. ● Migration of northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursims) pups in the Bering Sea. Final Report. Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Methods . 8 Results . , . , . , . 11 Discussion . 17 Summary . 31 References . 33 MIG~TION OF NORTHERM FUR SEAL ( CALLORHINUS URSINUS) PUPS IN TEE BERING SEA INTRODUCTION The northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) is arguably the most extensively studied marine mammal in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 56. Otariidae and Phocidae
    FAUNA of AUSTRALIA 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE JUDITH E. KING 1 Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Southern Elephant Seal–Mirounga leonina [G. Ross] Ross Seal, with pup–Ommatophoca rossii [J. Libke] Australian Sea-lion–Neophoca cinerea [G. Ross] Weddell Seal–Leptonychotes weddellii [P. Shaughnessy] New Zealand Fur-seal–Arctocephalus forsteri [G. Ross] Crab-eater Seal–Lobodon carcinophagus [P. Shaughnessy] 56. OTARIIDAE AND PHOCIDAE DEFINITION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnipeds are aquatic carnivores. They differ from other mammals in their streamlined shape, reduction of pinnae and adaptation of both fore and hind feet to form flippers. In the skull, the orbits are enlarged, the lacrimal bones are absent or indistinct and there are never more than three upper and two lower incisors. The cheek teeth are nearly homodont and some conditions of the ear that are very distinctive (Repenning 1972). Both superfamilies of pinnipeds, Phocoidea and Otarioidea, are represented in Australian waters by a number of species (Table 56.1). The various superfamilies and families may be distinguished by important and/or easily observed characters (Table 56.2). King (1983b) provided more detailed lists and references. These and other differences between the above two groups are not regarded as being of great significance, especially as an undoubted fur seal (Australian Fur-seal Arctocephalus pusillus) is as big as some of the sea lions and has some characters of the skull, teeth and behaviour which are rather more like sea lions (Repenning, Peterson & Hubbs 1971; Warneke & Shaughnessy 1985). The Phocoidea includes the single Family Phocidae – the ‘true seals’, distinguished from the Otariidae by the absence of a pinna and by the position of the hind flippers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Typological Study of the Structures of the Scottish Brochs Roger Martlew*
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 112 (1982), 254-276 The typological study of the structures of the Scottish brochs Roger Martlew* SUMMARY brieA f revie f publishewo d work highlight varyine sth g qualit f informatioyo n available th n eo structural features of brochs, and suggests that the evidence is insufficient to support the current far- reaching theories of broch origins and evolution. The use of numerical data for classification is discussed, and a cluster analysis of broch dimensions is presented. The three groups suggested by this analysis are examined in relation to geographical location, and to duns and 'broch-like' structures in Argyll. While the method is concluded to be useful, an improve- qualit e mendate th th necessar s an f i i t y o improvyo t interpretationd ai resulte o et th d san . INTRODUCTION AND REVIEW OF PUBLISHED WORK The brochs of Scotland have attracted a considerable amount of attention over the years, from the antiquarians of the last century to archaeologists currently working on both rescue and research projects. Modern development principlee th n si techniqued san excavationf so , though, have been applie vero brochsdt w yfe . Severa excavatione th f o lpase decade w th fe tf o s s have indeed been more careful research-orientated projects tha indiscriminate nth e diggin lase th t f go century, when antiquarians seemed intent on clearing out the greatest number of brochs in the shortest possible time. The result, however, is that a considerable amount of material from brochs exists in museum collections, but much of it is from excavations carried out with slight regard for stratigraphy and is consequently of little use in answering the detailed questions set by modern hypotheses.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Seal Species Profile Encyclopedia of Puget Sound June 9, 2014
    (Photograph by G. E. Davis) Harbor seal species profile Encyclopedia of Puget Sound June 9, 2014 Jacqlynn C. Zier and Joseph K. Gaydos* SeaDoc Society / UC Davis’ Karen C. Drayer Wildlife Health Center Orcas Island Office 942 Deer Harbor Road, Eastsound, WA 98245 *Corresponding author [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Distribution .............................................................................................................. 3 Global .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Local ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Populations .............................................................................................................. 4 Genetic diversity ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Population size ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Longevity and survival ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Fur Seal ~/
    Wflal~erv:-c;rrc. The Northern Fur Seal ~/ / U IS, S, R, / / Breeding grounds of the northern fur seals: Robben Island (Kaihyoto or Tyuleniy Island) off Sakhalin; the Commandel Islands (Bering Island and Medny or Copper Island) at the Soviet end of the Aleutian chain; and the Pribilof Islands - St. Paul Island, St. George Island, Otter Island, Walrus Island, and Sea Lion Rock. Cover - The Pribilof Islands in Bering Sea are the homeland of the largest fur eal herd in the world. Here the fur seals come ashore to bear their young on the rocks and sands above tidewater. The story behind the restoration and de­ velopment of the Ala ka fur cal herd is one of adventure and international diplomac}. It i a heartening account of cooperation among nations - an out- tanding example of wildlife conservation. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Walter J. Hickel, Secretary Leslie L. Glasgow, Assistant Secretary f01' Fish and Wildlife, PaTks, and Marine Resources Charles H , Meacham, Commissioner, U,S, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Philip M, Roedel, Di1'ecto1', BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES The Northern Fur Seal By RALPH C. BAKER, FORD WILKE, and C. HOWARD BALTZ02 Circular 336 Washington, D.C. April 1970 As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has basic responsibilities for water, fish, wildlife, mineral, land, park, and recreational resources. Indian and Territorial affairs are other major concerns of America's " Department of Natural Resources." The Department works to assure the wisest choice in managing all our resources so each will make its full contribution to a better United States - now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation of an Iron Age, Early Historic and Medieval Settlement and Metalworking Site at Eilean Olabhat, North Uist
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot 138 (2008), 27–104 EXCAVATION AT EILEAN OLABHAT, NORTH UIST | 27 Excavation of an Iron Age, Early Historic and medieval settlement and metalworking site at Eilean Olabhat, North Uist Ian Armit*, Ewan Campbell† and Andrew Dunwell‡ with contributions from Rupert Housley, Fraser Hunter, Adam Jackson, Melanie Johnson, Dawn McLaren, Jennifer Miller, K R Murdoch, Jennifer Thoms, and Graeme Warren and illustrations by Alan Braby, Craig Evenden, Libby Mulqueeny and Leeanne Whitelaw ABSTRACT The promontory site of Eilean Olabhat, North Uist was excavated between 1986 and 1990 as part of the Loch Olabhat Research Project. It was shown to be a complex enclosed settlement and industrial site with several distinct episodes of occupation. The earliest remains comprise a small Iron Age building dating to the middle centuries of the first millennium BC , which was modified on several occasions prior to its abandonment. Much later, the Early Historic remains comprise a small cellular building, latterly used as a small workshop within which fine bronze and silverwork was produced in the fifth to seventh centuries AD . Evidence of this activity is represented by quantities of mould and crucible fragments as well as tuyère and other industrial waste products. The site subsequently fell into decay for a second time prior to its medieval reoccupation probably in the 14th to 16th centuries AD . Eilean Olabhat has produced a well-stratified, though discontinuous, structural and artefactual sequence from the mid-first millennium BC to the later second millennium AD , and has important implications for ceramic development in the Western Isles over that period, as well as providing significant evidence for the nature and social context of Early Historic metalworking.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Age Scotland: Scarf Panel Report
    Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Images ©as noted in the text ScARF Summary Iron Age Panel Document September 2012 Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Summary Iron Age Panel Report Fraser Hunter & Martin Carruthers (editors) With panel member contributions from Derek Alexander, Dave Cowley, Julia Cussans, Mairi Davies, Andrew Dunwell, Martin Goldberg, Strat Halliday, and Tessa Poller For contributions, images, feedback, critical comment and participation at workshops: Ian Armit, Julie Bond, David Breeze, Lindsey Büster, Ewan Campbell, Graeme Cavers, Anne Clarke, David Clarke, Murray Cook, Gemma Cruickshanks, John Cruse, Steve Dockrill, Jane Downes, Noel Fojut, Simon Gilmour, Dawn Gooney, Mark Hall, Dennis Harding, John Lawson, Stephanie Leith, Euan MacKie, Rod McCullagh, Dawn McLaren, Ann MacSween, Roger Mercer, Paul Murtagh, Brendan O’Connor, Rachel Pope, Rachel Reader, Tanja Romankiewicz, Daniel Sahlen, Niall Sharples, Gary Stratton, Richard Tipping, and Val Turner ii Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Executive Summary Why research Iron Age Scotland? The Scottish Iron Age provides rich data of international quality to link into broader, European-wide research questions, such as that from wetlands and the well-preserved and deeply-stratified settlement sites of the Atlantic zone, from crannog sites and from burnt-down buildings. The nature of domestic architecture, the movement of people and resources, the spread of ideas and the impact of Rome are examples of topics that can be explored using Scottish evidence. The period is therefore important for understanding later prehistoric society, both in Scotland and across Europe. There is a long tradition of research on which to build, stretching back to antiquarian work, which represents a considerable archival resource.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PINNIPEDS of the CALIFORNIA CURRENT California
    ANTONELIS AND FISCUS: PINNIPEDS OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT CalCOFI Rep., Vol. XXI, 1980 THE PINNIPEDS OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT GEORGE A. ANTONELIS. JR. AND CLIFFORD H. FISCUS Marine Mammal Division Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 7600 Sand Point Way, N.E. Seattle, WA 981 15 ABSTRACT 10s pequenos peces en 10s cardumenes y peces ana- There are six species of pinnipeds-California sea dromos. Los dos focidos, otra vez con ciertas excep- lion, Zalophus californianus; northern sea lion, Eume- ciones, predan especies diferentes. Aparentemente, el topias jubatus; northern fur seal, Callorhinus ursinus; elefante marino se alimenta en aguas mas profundas que Guadalupe fur seal, Arctocephalus townsendi; harbor la foca peluda, alimentindose de especies demersales seal, Phoca uitulina richardsi; and northern elephant y benticas, y la foca peluda se alimenta de especiesdemer- seal, Mirounga angustirostris-that inhabit the study sales costeras y neriticas, entrando ocasionalmente en rios area of the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries y aguas estuarinas haciendopresa de 10s peces anadromos Investigations (CalCOFI). y otros pequeiios peces que entran regularmente en estas The numbers of animals in each population are given; aguas. the size, distribution, and seasonal movements are de- scribed. The known prey species of the pinnipeds are INTRODUCTION listed for each species. The otariids, with certain excep- The California Current, its components, and the Cali- tions, consume the same kinds of prey, although in slight- fornia Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations ly different amounts. In general they feed most commonly (CalCOFI) station plan have been described many times on the smaller schooling fishes and squids of the epi- in the past and are well known (Kramer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • FURS: GENERAL INFORMATION by Elizabeth R
    2 Revised U. So DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Letter March 10 National Bureau of Standards Circular 1964 Washington, D. C. 20234 LCSSS FURS: GENERAL INFORMATION by Elizabeth R. Hosterman CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. KINDS OF FURS: CHARACTERISTICS AND GEOGRAPHICAL 3 SOURCES 2.1 Rodent Family 4 (a) Water rodents 4 (b) Land rodents 4 2.2 Weasel Family 5 2.3 Cat Family 7 2.4 Dog Family S (a) Foxes 3 (b) Wolves a 2.5 Hoofed Animals 9 2.6 Bear-Raccoon Group 10 2.7 Miscellaneous 10 3. FUR MANUFACTURING 10 3.1 Curing and Dressing 10 3.2 Drying and Staking 11 3.3 Dyeing 13 4. SELECTION OF FURS BY CONSUMERS 15 4.1 Cost 15 4 . Use and Durability 16 4.3 Where To Buy 16 4.4 Labels 17 4.5 Workmanship IS 4.6 Quality 19 4.7 Genuine or Simulated 19 4.3 Fit, Style, and Color 19 5. CARE OF FURS 20 5.1 Home and Wearing Care 20 5.2 Storage Care 21 5.3 Cleaning of Furs 21 6. GLOSSARY OF TERMS 22 7 » BIBLIOGRAPHY 23 2 1. INTRODUCTION Both leather dressing and fur dressing have an origin which may be regarded as identical and which date back to a hazy period of antiquity. Ancient man killed animals in order to obtain food. The animals also furnished a skin which, after undergoing certain treatments, could be used as a covering for the body. Man had to, and did, find some means of preventing decay in a more or less permanent fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Seals and Sea Lions of California Marin and Sonoma Images By
    Seals and Sea Lions of California Marin and Sonoma Images by Jamie Hall and Suki Waters Six Species Represent two of the three families of pinnipeds (Latin fin or feather, foot) Eared seals True seals Walrus 50,000 years ago Six species out of the total of 34 Three of the species vanished since 1900 and then reappeared Eared Seals-- Otariids Fur seals Sea lions Walk on land Large foreflipper Small external ears True Seals -- Phocids Hump along on land Hindflippers wave in water Ear holes True Seals Ear holes are hard to see, especially on harbor seals Eared Seal Family Fur Seals Fur Seals Two species in California Now relatively rare Were once common in California Became extirpated Populations growing after decades of absence Guadalupe Fur Seal Bull and Female Guadualupe Guadalupe Fur Seal Pup Guadalupe Fur Seal Male Female – 6 to 8 ft – 4 to 5 ft – 375 pounds – 110 pounds – 13 Years – 23 Years Newborn 2 ft 9 lb Guadalupe Notes Now possible to find a Guadalupe ashore Look for that very pointed nose Juveniles may be hard to tell from California sea lions 3 rescued patients at MMC in January IUCN Near Threatened Northern Fur Seal Northern Fur Seal Family Northern Fur Seal Pup Northern Fur Seal Males Females – 5 to 7 ft – 4.5 to 5 ft – 400 to 600 lb – 90 to 110 lb – 18 to 20 years – 18 to 20 years Newborn – 2 ft – 60 lb Northern Fur Seals Return To Central/Northern California Farallon fur seals lost by 1840 Were seen at sea Then first birth in 1996 on the Farallones In 2011, at least 180 pups born Common Pinnipeds
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Fur Seal
    Our Wildlife Fact Sheet Australian Fur Seal The Australian Fur Seal is the Australian Fur Seals can move very quickly if they feel threatened. largest of all fur seals and the world’s fourth rarest seal species. Diet The Australian Fur Seal mainly feeds on a diet of bony Scientific name fish species, squid and octopus. Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus They are very skilful hunters with keen senses and Did you know? eyesight. They have been also known to take The Australian Fur Seal was hunted to the edge of advantage of fishing nets, taking fish from the catch. extinction in the 19th century, but population sizes are Habitat now increasing. The Australian Fur Seal can be found in coastal waters They can dive up to 150 m in search of prey. and oceans. Although they can breathe on land Australian Fur Seals They prefer rocky islands, boulder and pebble beaches prefer to live in the water spending weeks feeding at and rocky ledges for resting and breeding. sea. Distribution The mother seal and pups can recognise each other by The Australian Fur Seal can be found around the using a familiar call. islands of the Bass Strait, southern Victoria and parts of Tasmania. They have also been seen on islands off Australian Fur Seals, like all seals, can raise their body South Australia and southern New South Wales. with their front flippers enabling them to move on land. Description The Australian Fur Seal can reach up to 2.5 m in length. Adult males are heavier than the females, weighing up to 100 kg.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Identification of Pinniped Skulls of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary
    Guide to Identification of Pinniped Skulls of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary California Sea Lion (CSLI) Harbor Seal (HASE) Northern Elephant Seal (NESE) Skull: Strong sexual dimorphism; triangular postorbital Skull: Minimal sexual dimorphism; no postorbital Skull: Strong sexual dimorphism; no postorbital processes; wide intraorbital region; adult male has processes; narrow intraorbital region; large auditory processes, large nasal shelf pronounced sagittal crest bullae (on ventral side, not shown in photo) Scapula: Large with two ridges Scapula: Comma-shaped with a single ridge Scapula: Large, fan-shaped with a single ridge Teeth: Postcanine teeth usually bearing at least 3 Teeth: Unicuspid post canines with strong cingulum Teeth: Very large canines, postcanines reduced and cusps (mountainous); upper incisors of uniform size often bearing accessory cusplets; upper postcanines peglike, lacking cusps; total of 2 lower incisors generally uniformly spaced; third upper incisor enlarged Photos: S. Pemberton, California Academy of Sciences Guide to Identification of Pinniped Skulls of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Steller Sea Lion (SSLI) Northern Fur Seal (NOFS) Guadalupe Fur Seal (GUFS) Skull: Strong sexual dimorphism; adult male has no Skull: Obvious sexual dimorphism; postorbital Skull: Strong sexual dimorphism (no male pictured); obvious sagittal crest; square or rectangular postorbital processes point back; greatest width across nasals postorbital processes point outwards; greatest width processes; wide intraorbital region almost equaling their length (snout short) across nasals about one-half their length (snout long) Scapula: Very large with two ridges Scapula: Small with two ridges Teeth: Large canines; unicuspid postcanines, no cusplets; wide gap separating last upper postcanine Teeth: Large canines; unicuspid postcanines with from its predecessor in adults; third upper incisor possible minor cusplets; third upper incisor enlarged enlarged Photos: S.
    [Show full text]