DOCSLIB.ORG

A Plan for the Protection of Sharon/S Open Space

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Plan for the Protection of Sharon/S Open Space *,$-02&#0-2#!2'-,-$ &0-,_1.#,.!# 3*7TRST 2010LeafRoffAerialPhotograph–NHGranit PreparedbytheSharonOpenSpacePlanningCommittee,asubcommitteeofthe SharonConservationCommission,withassistancefromTheMonadnockConservancy’s MonadnockCommunityConservationPartnership, andwithinputfromthepeopleofSharon. APlanfortheProtectionofSharon’sOpenSpace A. Introduction Openspaceprotectionisaneffectivetoolforpreservingcommunitycharacter,protectingtheenvironmentand enhancingqualityoflife.Consensusabouttheroleofopenspaceprotectionincommunityplanningiscritical. Having taken into consideration other community goals, an Open Space Plan is the basis for establishing prioritiesandpolicies. B. BackgroundandJustification The population of New Hampshire grew 6.5% from 2000 to 2010, with a population estimate of 1,316,470 accordingto2010censusfigures.HillsboroughCountyhadthegreatestpopulationincreaseoftheState’sten counties.Whiletherearesomepositiveaspectstogrowth,withitcomemanychallenges,nottheleastofwhich are stresses on the environment. One of the most serious concerns is the permanent loss of open spaces. Statewide,itisestimatedthat15,000acresofopenlandaredevelopedeveryyear. The 2002 Master Plan states that Sharon’s environment is fragile with a limited capacity to support further development.TheMasterPlanalsonotesthatin2002,“muchofthemostsuitablelandfordevelopmenthas beenutilized.Increasingly,buildinglotswillbeproposedonmarginalland;landwithsteepslopes,wetlands,or withotherlimitations.Unlessprecautionsaretaken,futuredevelopmentcouldalsodiminishordestroysomeof theTown’sremaininghistoriclandmarks.” C. Purposes ThisOpenSpacePlansupportsandfulfillsmanyofthegoalsandrecommendationsofthe2002SharonMaster Plan.Principallytheseincludeseveralappearingunderthesection“GoalsandRecommendations”onpage18of theMasterPlan. Goals: 1. “Topreservetheessentiallyruralcharacterinagrowingandurbanizingworld.” 2. “Toprotectstreams,riversandwetlands.” 7. “Torecognizeandprotectenvironmentallysensitivelandsandsurfacewaters.” 8. “ToestablishandmaintainanopenspacesystemcomprisedoftheTown’senvironmentallysensitive areas,whicharelinkedbytrailsandcorridorstoprovidewildlifeandpedestrianpassagethroughout thetown.” 9. “Topreservelargetractsofopenwoodland.” 10 ”Toprotectourforestedhillsides.” 11 “TopreservetheruralcharacterofallroadsinSharon.” Recommendations: “CompletetheprotectionoftheslopesofTempleMountain.” “Expand the Town Forest, linking it with our two other major open space areas to the east and southwest.” “ProtecttheentirelengthoftheGridleyRiveranditswatershedfromsedimentation,erosion,pollution orinappropriatedevelopment.” “Take steps to assure that our children, new Town residents and the residents of an increasingly urbanizingstateunderstandtheimportanceofkeepingSharonrural.” Page1 APlanfortheProtectionofSharon’sOpenSpace “Developaconservationplan.” “Developahillsidedevelopmentordinance.” “MakeeveryefforttopreservetheGridleyaquifer.” “Makeeveryefforttopurchaseorprotectenvironmentallysensitivegravelbearinglands” ThisPlansetsforthcriteria,goalsandrecommendationsforimplementinganOpenSpaceProtectionPlanand establishes a role for Town government in land conservation as a matter of public policy. That public policy acknowledgesthatbyprotectingcertainnaturalfeaturesdescribedhereunder“OpenSpacePlanGoals,”Town government is protecting or enhancing certain resource values. At a minimum, the Plan directs the Town of Sharontopromotelandconservationandtobevigilantinseekingopportunitiestoprotectland.Theroleof Towngovernmentinthisareamayalsobetoeducatelandownersaboutthetopic,networkamonglandowners andlandtrustsandacquirelandorconservationeasements. D. PlanningApproach Inthespringof2010,theTownofSharonbeganaprocesstodevelopatownopenspaceconservationplan.An adhocSharonOpenSpaceCommitteewasformedasasubRcommitteeoftheSharonConservationCommission. ItjoinedtheMonadnockConservancy’sMonadnockCommunityConservationPartnershipprogram.TheSharon OpenSpaceCommitteeincludedmembersoftheConservationCommission,PlanningBoard,SelectBoard,and citizensatlarge. TheCommitteeconductedaConservationSurveytocollectinputfromresidentsastowhattheyvaluemost aboutthetownandwhatresourcestheyfeelcontributemosttothetown’squalityoflife.Residentswereasked toindicateonatownmapwherespecialplacesarelocatedandwhatmakestheseplacesunique.Residentswho attended the 2010 Sharon Town Picnic were asked to complete the survey and during the fall of 2010, the surveywasmailedtoall118householdsintown.Atotalof57surveyswerereturned.Inaddition,volunteers fromtheplanningcommitteeinterceptedcitizenscomingtothetownofficesduringofficehoursonTuesdays evenings and invited them to identify special places in town by placing sticky dots on a map. Between the surveysandtheeveningsatthetownoffice,298dotswereplacedonthetownmap. The planning committee also reviewed natural resource information and maps provided by the Monadnock Conservancy.ThecommitteereachedconsensusonasetofOpenSpaceGoalsandNaturalFeaturesImportant toProtect.Inallcases,thegoalsandfeaturesweredeterminedtobeessentialtocommunitywellRbeinginsome basicway,orarepartofhowresidentsdefineSharon’scommunitycharacter.Ultimately,allarebasictothe environmentalqualityandruralcharacterofSharon. E. CommunityValues In summarizing the results of the Conservation Survey, it was found that survey respondents have the same primaryvalueasstatedinthe2002MasterPlan:“Ourprimarygoal,andourresponsibility,istoforgeablueprint thatwillensurethattwentyyearsfromnow,Sharonremainsasmall,rural,beautifulcommunity.”Thesurvey resultsindicatedthatpeoplebelievethatalloftheresourcesaddressedinthesurveycontributetocommunity characterandqualityoflife,withcleanwater,cleanair,wildlifehabitat,andpeaceandquietconsideredtobe mostimportant.Thesurveyfurtherhighlightedthattheundeveloped,unspoiledlandscape,thepeaceandquiet and isolation, and the small scale of the town were the features that most contribute to the town’s unique qualities.Whenaskedtoidentifyplacesmostimportanttoconserve,landsalongtheGridleyRiver,theTown Forest and Meadow Brook, the mountain area along the eastern town boundary and the undeveloped road frontageswereareasmostfrequentlyidentified. Page2 APlanfortheProtectionofSharon’sOpenSpace F. OpenSpacePlanGoals 1. ConserveandprotectrivercorridorsandwetlandsassociatedwiththeGridleyRiver,MeadowBrook,Town Line Brook, and their tributaries. This will buffer these high quality streams from the adverse effects of developmentandprovideimportantcorridorsforwildlife. 2. Conserve and protect the current and potential drinking water resources including the stratified drift aquifersandtheirrechargeareaslocatedthroughouttheTown. 3. Maintain the large blocks of undeveloped land by conserving lands adjacent to existing conserved lands, including: TheblockbetweenJarmanyHillRoadandNHRte.124; TheTownForestblocknorthofJarmanyHillRoad;and TheblockbetweenNHRte.123andTempleMountain. Eachoftheseblocksisasignificantcontributortothehealthofwildlifepopulationsandthewaterqualityin thethreestreams. 4. Conservelandthatcanprovideconnectorsandcorridorsbetweenthelargeblocksofundevelopedland,as wellassteepslopesandviewsheds. 5. Protectridgelines,viewshedsandsteepslopes.RegulatecutRandRfilltopreventlandslidesandtopreserve waterquality/safety. 6. Preserve the rural character of Sharon’s roads, particularly those with scenic and undeveloped road frontages. ThesegoalsreaffirmandexpandonthegoalsandrecommendationssetforthinSharon’s2002MasterPlan. TheGoalsalsoreflectthe“landswithimportantconservationvalues”thatwereidentifiedthroughthisplanning process and are displayed on the final map of the Natural and Community Resources Inventory, attached as AppendixAtothisplan. G. ImplementationStrategies WaterTesting:TheConservationCommissionwillcontinuethewatertestingithasconductedeachyearsince 2002. BuildCommunitySupport:TheConservationCommissionwillencouragethepeopleofSharontogetoutonto theland.TrailsintheTownForesthavebeenclearedandmarked,andadditionaltrailsarebeingdeveloped.A mapisbeingcreatedandwillbemadeavailabletothepublic,bothontheTownwebsiteandatthetrailheads. Community Awareness: The Open Space Committee shared survey results at the 2011 Town Picnic and on a posterboardintheTownHouse.TheCommitteewillsharetheNaturalResourceInventoryandOpenSpacePlan witheveryoneinthecommunityandwillinvitecitizencommentandinput. LandownerOutreach:Whenappropriate,talkwithlandownersaboutthespecialcharacteristicsoftheirland; share natural resource information; share information about conservation options; provide access to best managementpracticesformanagingtheirland. H. OverviewofLandConservation There are two primary ways to protect land for conservation purposes: Conservation Land Transactions and Regulation. This plan focuses primarily on the former, which involves working directly with interested landowners.ThetwomostcommonConservationLandTransactionsareacquisitionoftheland,whichcanbe Page3 APlanfortheProtectionofSharon’sOpenSpace done through a landowner donation or by purchasing the land, and acquisition of a conservation easement, whichalsocanbedonethroughalandownerdonationoftheeasementorbypurchasingtheeasement. ConservationLandTransactionscanbeinitiatedintwoways: Activeandstrategic:IdentifyinghighRpriorityparcelsandactivelyencouragingthelandownertoconserve theirland.Whensuccessful,theseprojectshavethegreatestpotentialtoachievecommunitygoals. Responsive to opportunities as they arise: Most land protection accomplishments come as the result of beingvigilantandreadytorespondwhenalandownerdecidestoconserveorselltheirland.Havingthe OpenSpacePlaninplacewillhelpguidetowndecisionstosupportaprojectwhentheseopportunitiesarise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NH Trout Stocking - April 2018
    NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 ACWORTH COLD RIVER 111 ALBANY IONA LAKE 1 ALLENSTOWN ARCHERY POND 1 ALLENSTOWN BEAR BROOK 1 ALLENSTOWN CATAMOUNT POND 1 ALSTEAD COLD RIVER 1 ALSTEAD NEWELL POND 1 ALSTEAD WARREN LAKE 1 ALTON BEAVER BROOK 1 ALTON COFFIN BROOK 1 ALTON HURD BROOK 1 ALTON WATSON BROOK 1 ALTON WEST ALTON BROOK 1 AMHERST SOUHEGAN RIVER 11 ANDOVER BLACKWATER RIVER 11 ANDOVER HIGHLAND LAKE 11 ANDOVER HOPKINS POND 11 ANTRIM WILLARD POND 1 AUBURN MASSABESIC LAKE 1 1 1 1 BARNSTEAD SUNCOOK LAKE 1 BARRINGTON ISINGLASS RIVER 1 BARRINGTON STONEHOUSE POND 1 BARTLETT THORNE POND 1 BELMONT POUT POND 1 BELMONT TIOGA RIVER 1 BELMONT WHITCHER BROOK 1 BENNINGTON WHITTEMORE LAKE 11 BENTON OLIVERIAN POND 1 BERLIN ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 11 BRENTWOOD EXETER RIVER 1 1 BRISTOL DANFORTH BROOK 11 BRISTOL NEWFOUND LAKE 1 BRISTOL NEWFOUND RIVER 11 BRISTOL PEMIGEWASSET RIVER 11 BRISTOL SMITH RIVER 11 BROOKFIELD CHURCHILL BROOK 1 BROOKFIELD PIKE BROOK 1 BROOKLINE NISSITISSIT RIVER 11 CAMBRIDGE ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 1 CAMPTON BOG POND 1 CAMPTON PERCH POND 11 CANAAN CANAAN STREET LAKE 11 CANAAN INDIAN RIVER 11 NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 CANAAN MASCOMA RIVER, UPPER 11 CANDIA TOWER HILL POND 1 CANTERBURY SPEEDWAY POND 1 CARROLL AMMONOOSUC RIVER 1 CARROLL SACO LAKE 1 CENTER HARBOR WINONA LAKE 1 CHATHAM BASIN POND 1 CHATHAM LOWER KIMBALL POND 1 CHESTER EXETER RIVER 1 CHESTERFIELD SPOFFORD LAKE 1 CHICHESTER SANBORN BROOK
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Town of Peterborough, New Hampshire
    m^ of the town officers of Peterborough, H. H. for the year ending JANUARY 31, 1942 Also Reports of the school district officers for the year ending JUNE 30, 1941 Transcript Printing Company - Peterborough, New Hampshire W0> of the town officers of Peterborough, (1 H. for the year ending JANUARY 31, 1942 Also Reports of the school district officers for the year ending JUNE 30, 1941 Transcript Printing Company - Peterborough, New Hampshire P4-'t / 94 TOWN OFFICERS Moderator Lincoln R. Lounsbury Town Clerk Algie A. Holt Town Treasurer Robert J. Paquet Selectmen Carey A. Walbridge, term expires 1942 Harry F. Smith, term expires 1943 Richard Allen Day, term expires 1944 Overseer of the Poor Ernest L. White Collector of Taxes, Appointed by Selectmen Algie A. Holt Supervisors of Checklist Theodore W. Gunn Thomas S. Nichols Winslow C. Morse Fire Chief Earl W. Wyman Firewards David J. Rochford W. Robert Nichols Robert T. Brooks Sexton, Appointed by Selectmen Highway Agent Kenneth Wetherbee Library Trustees Lincoln R. Lounsbury, term expires 1942 Hazel N. Goyette, term expires 1943 Charles M. Larrabee, term expires 1944 Police, Appointed by Selectmen Albert J. Picard, Chief Howard J. Keddy, Regular Specials Frederick Buckley Albert A. Perry Carey Johnson Bertrice H. Grant Amos Rabideau Constable, Appointed by Selectmen Howard J. Keddy Dog Police, Appointed by Selectmen Albert J. Picard Surveyor of Wood and Lumber, Appointed by Selectmen Albion J. LaFleur Cemetery Trustees, Appointed by Selectmen Charles M. Cummings, W. A. Bryer, Arnold D. Rundlett Water Department In charge of the Selectmen Maurice H. Muzzey, Supt. Trustees of Trust Funds Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to New Ipswich
    Welcome to the Town of New Ipswich New Hampshire’s First Purple Heart Community www.townofnewipswich.org 1 Table of Contents Automobile-Town Clerk 9 Building Inspector 8 Dog Registration-Town Clerk 11 Emergency 19 Fire Rescue Department 14 Green Center 15 Government 5 History of New Ipswich 3 Hospitals 17 Information and Support 21 Library 17 Marriage/Civil Union License-Town Clerk 11 Nature Trails 13 Notary Public 12 Outside Services 18 Places of Worship 17 Police Department 14 Recreation/Pool 12 Schools 17 Services 20 Tax Collector 9 Town Departments/Hours 18 Town Government 5 Transfer Station 15 Vital Records-Birth, Death, Marriage-Town Clerk 11 Voter Registration-Town Clerk/Supervisors of Checklist 7 2 A Capsule History of New Ipswich, NH The physical characteristics of New Ipswich made it an ideal location for industry in the early days of its settlement. Hills, mountains and valleys with riverlets emptying into the larger Souhegan River provided a surplus of water power to run the many saw mills, grist mills, starch mills and textile manufacturing plants in the Town’s past. Today, the only textile mill still in existence and operational is the Warwick Mill, which is now call Warwick Mills. This mill is notable as an example of fine brick work, as well as being the site of the second textile manufacturing plant established in New Hampshire. New Ipswich is a town of villages. Wilder Village to the west on Route 124 was the site of the Wilder Chair Factory from 1810 to 1869 and was home to the famous and much sought after Wilder Chair.
    [Show full text]
  • Npdes) Permit to Discharge to Waters of the United States
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EPA NEW ENGLAND OFFICE OF ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION ONE CONGRESS STREET SUITE 1100 (MAIL CODE: CPE) BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02114-2023 FACT SHEET DRAFT NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT TO DISCHARGE TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC NOTICE START AND END DATES: PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER: CONTENTS: Twenty-nine (29) pages including five (5) Attachments A through E. NPDES PERMIT NO.: NH0101044 NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF APPLICANT: Franklin Pierce College College Road P.O. Box 60 Rindge, New Hampshire 03461-0060 NAME AND ADDRESS OF FACILITY WHERE DISCHARGE OCCURS: Facility Location Franklin Pierce College Wastewater Treatment Plant College Road Rindge, New Hampshire Mailing Address Franklin Pierce College Wastewater Treatment Plant c/o Maintenance Supervisor P.O. Box 60 Rindge, New Hampshire 03461-0060 RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed Wetland Tributary to Pearly Pond (Hydrologic Basin Code: 01080202) -2- NH0101044 CLASSIFICATION: Class B I. Proposed Action, Type of Facility and Discharge Location. The above named applicant has applied to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New England Office (EPA-New England) for reissuance of its NPDES permit to discharge secondary treated wastewater with enhanced nutrient removal into the designated receiving water (Unnamed Wetland Tributary to Pearly Pond). In turn, Pearly Pond flows into Tarbell Brook, a tributary of the Millers River which itself is a tributary of the Connecticut River. The facility collects and treats domestic (sanitary) wastewater from Franklin Pierce College (“College”) and discharges that treated effluent into the receiving water. The plant is designed as a 0.14 million gallon per day (MGD) advanced wastewater treatment facility that is composed of, in order that wastewater flow is processed, primary clarification, rotating biological contactors (RBC’s), secondary clarification, phosphorus removal with alum (flocculation tank/clarifier), sand filtration and ultraviolet disinfection.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA REVIEW of NEW HAMPSHIRE's 2016 SECTION 303(D) LIST
    EPA REVIEW OF NEW HAMPSHIRE’S 2016 SECTION 303(d) LIST INTRODUCTION EPA has conducted a review of most of New Hampshire's 2016 section 303(d) list, supporting documentation and other information, with only a few waters remaining to be analyzed. Based on this review, EPA has determined that the majority of New Hampshire’s list of water quality limited segments (WQLSs) still requiring total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) meets the requirements of section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act ("CWA" or "the Act") and EPA implementing regulations; however, as noted immediately below, EPA is not taking action at this time to approve or to disapprove the State’s decisions relating to certain assessment zones in the Great Bay Estuary. Therefore, by this action, EPA hereby approves New Hampshire’s 2016 final section 303(d) list with the exception of the following: Little Bay, Bellamy River, Upper Piscataqua River, Portsmouth Harbor, Little Harbor/Back Channel and Great Bay assessment zones; and the Upper Portsmouth Harbor, Great Bay Prohib SZ2 and Great Bay-Cond Appr assessment units. EPA is deferring action on the State’s list with respect to this group of assessment zones and units until a later date when EPA’s review is completed. EPA needs more time to complete its review of these assessment zones and units because of the complexity of the assessment issues involved. The statutory and regulatory requirements for New Hampshire’s 2016 section 303(d) list, and EPA's review of New Hampshire’s compliance with each requirement, are described in detail below.
    [Show full text]
  • Montachusett HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2014
    MONTACHUSETT HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Ashby 2014 Ashburnham Athol Ayer Clinton Devens Fitchburg Gardner Groton Harvard Hubbardston Lancaster Leominster Lunenburg Petersham Phillipston Royalston Shirley Sterling Templeton Prepared by: Townsend Westminster Montachusett Regional Planning Commission (MRPC) Winchendon 1427R Water Street, Fitchburg, MA 01420 The preparation of this plan was funded by a grant from the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency in Cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Matching funds were provided by the MRPC. Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Overview ................................................................................................................... 2 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 2 Geographic Area ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Community Involvement .......................................................................................................................... 3 2. Planning Process ................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Regional Profile ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Population, Households and Employment ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT 7 Hazen Drive, PO Box 483 Concord, NH 03302-0483 14
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Gov. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-NH-RD-14282F Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Estimation of Flood Discharges at Selected Recurrence Intervals for Streams in New 2008 Hampshire 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Scott A. Olson 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) U. S. Geological Survey New Hampshire-Vermont Water Science Center 361 Commerce Way Pembroke, NH 03275 11. Contract or Grant No. 14282F, X-A000 (601) 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered New Hampshire Department of Transportation FINAL REPORT 7 Hazen Drive, PO Box 483 Concord, NH 03302-0483 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes In cooperation with the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract This report provides estimates of flood discharges at selected recurrence intervals for streamgages in and adjacent to New Hampshire and equations for estimating flood discharges at recurrence intervals of 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-years for ungaged, unregulated, rural streams in New Hampshire. The equations were developed using generalized least-squares regression. Flood-frequency and drainage-basin characteristics from 117 streamgages were used in developing the equations. The drainage-basin characteristics used as explanatory variables in the regression equations include drainage area, mean April precipitation, percentage of wetland area, and main channel slope. The average standard error of prediction for estimating the 2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year recurrence interval flood discharges with these equations are 30.0, 30.8, 32.0, 34.2, 36.0, 38.1, and 43.4 percent, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Re: Request for Approval of Amendments to New Hampshire Surface Water Quality Standards
    The State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Robert R. Scott Commissioner December 13, 2019 Dennis Deziel, Regional Administrator EPA New England, Region 1 5 Post Office Square - Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 Re: Request for approval of amendments to New Hampshire Surface Water Quality Standards Dear Mr. Deziel: On January 20, 2018, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) made a 1 request to EPA to approve adopted amendments to the state's surface water quality standards • One of those amendments, regarding the dissolved oxygen (DO) saturation standard, was precipitated by a change in state law. Senate Bill (SB)127, effective September 8, 2017, amended State statutes (RSA 485-A:2, A:6 and A:8) regarding dissolved oxygen standards. NHDES submitted a request to EPA to add this amended statute to our approved state surface water quality standards per the requirements of 40 CFR § 131.6 and § 131.20(c ). This letter is to withdraw that request. Since submitting our request, NHDES and EPA Region 1 have been in detailed communication. A request for more information was sent by EPA to the state on July 3, 2019. NHDES responded to this letter on October 23, 2019, to which EPA replied on November 7, 2019. At the same time, NHDES has been in close communication with stakeholders and legislators regarding this issue. What is clear from all of these communications is that the issue of changing the DO saturation standard is much more complicated than originally thought. To this end, NHDES is working with the legislature to add more flexibility to the state's ability to set surface water quality standards for dissolved oxygen.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics and Classification of Least Altered Streamflows in Massachusetts Z 6 2 Z
    Figures 17 and 19 66 A.1 MA1 MA1 MA3 MA3 200 Characteristics andClassificationofLeastAlteredStreamflowsinMassachusetts 42 42 2.25 41 43 41 43 44 44 2.00 150 43 43 42 1.75 PERCENT 42 44 44 PER SQUARE MILE 100 1.50 43 44 43 44 DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 41 42 43 44 41 42 43 44 -Z 0 Z -Z 0 Z Family Alpha: 0.12 Family Alpha: 0.12 Bonferroni Individual Alpha: 0.02 |Bonferroni Z-value|: 2.326 Bonferroni Individual Alpha: 0.02 |Bonferroni Z-value|: 2.326 MA12 MA12 MA15 MA15 3.0 42 42 6 41 43 41 43 2.5 44 44 5 2.0 43 43 42 42 44 44 PER SQUARE MILE 4 1.5 PER SQUARE MILE 43 44 3 43 44 DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 1.0 41 42 43 44 DISCHARGE, IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND 41 42 43 44 -Z 0 Z -Z 0 Z Family Alpha: 0.12 Family Alpha: 0.12 Bonferroni Individual Alpha: 0.02 |Bonferroni Z-value|: 2.326 Bonferroni Individual Alpha: 0.02 |Bonferroni Z-value|: 2.326 Figure 17. (A) 20 hydrologic indices and (B) 12 basin characteristics for streamflow-gaging stations in the four-cluster classification, southern New England. Sign confidence intervals (90 percent) are shown by the red bars inside the individual boxplots. Cluster names are SRO, southern runoff-dominated (41); NRO, northern runoff-dominated (42); HRO, high-gradient runoff-dominated (43); and BF, base-flow-dominated (44). The stations in the four clusters are shown in figure 16.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 EPA Letter
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 1 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 June 22, 2018 Clark Freise, Assistant Commissioner New Hampshire Environmental Services Water Division 6 Hazen Drive, Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 Re: 2016 §303(d) List Dear Mr. Freise, Thank you for submitting New Hampshire's 2016 §303(d) list of water quality limited segments on November 30, 2017. In accordance with §303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and 40 CFR §130.7, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has conducted a review of most of the State's list, including supporting documentation, with only a few waters remaining to be analyzed. Based on this review, EPA has determined that the majority of New Hampshire’s list of water quality limited segments (WQLSs) still requiring total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) meets the requirements of §303(d) of the Clean Water Act ("CWA" or "the Act") and EPA implementing regulations. However, EPA is not taking action at this time to approve or to disapprove the State’s decisions relating to certain assessment zones in the Great Bay Estuary and the State’s decisions on pH for the Upper Portsmouth Harbor, Great Bay Prohib SZ2, and Great Bay-Cond Appr assessment units. Therefore, EPA hereby approves New Hampshire’s 2016 final §303(d) list with the exception of the following: Little Bay, Bellamy River, Upper Piscataqua River, Portsmouth Harbor, Little Harbor/Back Channel and Great Bay assessment zones; and the Upper Portsmouth Harbor, Great Bay Prohib SZ2, and Great Bay-Cond Appr assessment units.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Inventory Norfolk, Connecticut
    Natural Resource Inventory Norfolk, Connecticut Natural Resource Inventory Norfolk, Connecticut 2009 first edition Front cover: Wild iris (Iris versicolor). © Bruce Frisch Inside front cover: Pink ladyslipper (Cypripedium acaule). © Bruce Frisch Inside back cover: Heron (Ardea herodias). © Bruce Frisch Back cover: Northern spring peeper (Pseudacris crucifer). © Joel Pensley This report is © copyright, Town of Norfolk, Connecticut. All rights re- served. Individual photographs are the property of the photographers and may not be used apart from this report without written permission from the photographer. Individual copies of this report may be made for personal or noncommercial educational purposes. All other uses must have written permission from the Town. Address the Office of Selectmen, PO Box 552, Norfolk CT 06058. Town Web site: http:// www.norfolkct.org. Note: some corrections were made after the first printing. 4 Introduction The natural world—a web of animal, plant and mineral resources—sustains human existence. Our economies, our lifestyles, our very existence would not be possible without it. Both climate and human development have left many areas of the world relatively poor in natural resources, but Norfolk is fortunate to be rich in them. This inventory attempts to convey how many we have, to list what they are and to explain why they are important. Each of the report’s first eight chapters describes a type of resource and its impor- tance. Chapter nine presents scenic resources; chapter ten, historic resources, and chapter eleven contains recommendations based upon the information in all the chapters. The first eight appendices present the meat of the inventory—the lists, tables and charts of data.
    [Show full text]