NOTES JBU SPEECH RCA CONVENTION Jewish Leadership
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Highlighting the Impact of Revel
HIGHLIGHTING THE IMPACT OF REVEL BERNARD REVEL GRADUATE SCHOOL OF JEWISH STUDIES YESHIVA UNIVERSITY Highlighting the Impact of Revel To honor the eightieth anniversary of the founding of the Bernard Revel Graduate School, we highlight the impact that Revel has had on Jewish scholarship, education, and leadership worldwide. Inside this pamphlet are 80 publications, lectures, and courses presented by Revel faculty and alumni during Revel’s eightieth year. This is a sample of the hundreds of presentations delivered over the years. PUBLICATIONS Rabbi Hayyim Angel “Controversies over the Historicity of Biblical Passages in Traditional Commentary,” Increasing Peace through Balanced Torah Study, Conversations 27. Dr. Joseph Angel “A Newly Discovered Interpretation of Isaiah 40:12-13 in the Song of the Sage.” Ha-Ish Moshe: Studies in Scriptural Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature in Honor of Moshe J. Bernstein (Brill, 2017) . Rabbi Yitzchak Blau “Idolatry and Martyrdom,” Torah U’Madda Journal. Dr. Elisheva Carlebach Essay in Reimagined: 45 Years of Jewish Art (Glitterati Inc., 2016). Rabbi Shalom Carmy “’It Can Sink So Low and No Lower: On Fanaticism and Dogma,’” Tradition 50:1 Dr. Yaakov Elman Co-author. “The Quantification of Religious Obligation in Second Temple Jerusalem.” Ha-Ish Moshe: Studies in Scriptural Interpretation in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Related Literature in Honor of Moshe J. Bernstein (Brill, 2017). Dr. Steven Fine The Menorah: From the Bible to Modern Israel (Harvard University Press, 2016). Dr. Ezra Frazer Abraham Ibn Ezra on Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi: A Critical Edition, Translation, and Super Commentary with an Analytic Introduction. -
Intermarriage and Jewish Leadership in the United States
Steven Bayme Intermarriage and Jewish Leadership in the United States There is a conflict between personal interests and collective Jewish welfare. As private citizens, we seek the former; as Jewish leaders, however, our primary concern should be the latter. Jewish leadership is entrusted with strengthening the collective Jewish endeavor. The principle applies both to external questions of Jewish security and to internal questions of the content and meaning of leading a Jewish life. Countercultural Messages Two decades ago, the American Jewish Committee (AJC) adopted a “Statement on Mixed Marriage.”1 The statement was reaffirmed in 1997 and continues to represent the AJC’s view regarding Jewish communal policy on this difficult and divisive issue. The document, which is nuanced and calls for plural approaches, asserts that Jews prefer to marry other Jews and that efforts at promoting endogamy should be encouraged. Second, when a mixed marriage occurs, the best outcome is the conversion of the non-Jewish spouse, thereby transforming a mixed marriage into an endogamous one. When conversion is not possible, efforts should be directed at encouraging the couple to raise their children exclusively as Jews. All three messages are countercultural in an American society that values egalitarianism, universalism, and multiculturalism. Preferring endogamy contradicts a universalist ethos of embracing all humanity. Encouraging conversion to Judaism suggests preference for one faith over others. Advocating that children be raised exclusively as Jews goes against multicultural diversity, which proclaims that having two faiths in the home is richer than having a single one. It is becoming increasingly difficult for Jewish leaders to articulate these messages. -
Melilah Agunah Sptib W Heads
Agunah and the Problem of Authority: Directions for Future Research Bernard S. Jackson Agunah Research Unit Centre for Jewish Studies, University of Manchester [email protected] 1.0 History and Authority 1 2.0 Conditions 7 2.1 Conditions in Practice Documents and Halakhic Restrictions 7 2.2 The Palestinian Tradition on Conditions 8 2.3 The French Proposals of 1907 10 2.4 Modern Proposals for Conditions 12 3.0 Coercion 19 3.1 The Mishnah 19 3.2 The Issues 19 3.3 The talmudic sources 21 3.4 The Gaonim 24 3.5 The Rishonim 28 3.6 Conclusions on coercion of the moredet 34 4.0 Annulment 36 4.1 The talmudic cases 36 4.2 Post-talmudic developments 39 4.3 Annulment in takkanot hakahal 41 4.4 Kiddushe Ta’ut 48 4.5 Takkanot in Israel 56 5.0 Conclusions 57 5.1 Consensus 57 5.2 Other issues regarding sources of law 61 5.3 Interaction of Remedies 65 5.4 Towards a Solution 68 Appendix A: Divorce Procedures in Biblical Times 71 Appendix B: Secular Laws Inhibiting Civil Divorce in the Absence of a Get 72 References (Secondary Literature) 73 1.0 History and Authority 1.1 Not infrequently, the problem of agunah1 (I refer throughout to the victim of a recalcitrant, not a 1 The verb from which the noun agunah derives occurs once in the Hebrew Bible, of the situations of Ruth and Orpah. In Ruth 1:12-13, Naomi tells her widowed daughters-in-law to go home. -
Poles and Jews: the Quest for Self-Determination 1919- 1934
Poles and Jews: The Quest For Self-Determination 1919- 1934 By Feigue Cieplinski Poland became an independent nation against all odds in the interwar period and retained her sovereignty from 1919 to 1939; hence the concept “interwar Poland.” The vicissitudes of her existence earned her the name of “God’s Playground.” [1] The Jews within her borders shared her history since 1240 C.E. Their freedoms during this period, unequaled in other places of Western Europe, earned Poland the Biblical allusion of “New Canaan.” [2] In contrast, some scholars have described Poland’s Jewry in the interwar Republic as being “On the Edge Of Destruction.” [3] That Polish Jewry was in distress is attested by the urgent visit of Mr. Neville Laski, a member of the British Joint Foreign Committee closely associated with the American Jewish Committee (AJC) and the Joint Distribution Committee, in 1934. [4] His August visit fell between two historical events framing Polish Jewry’s status: seven months before, in January of that year, Poland and Germany signed a bilateral non- aggression declaration and in September Colonel Josef Beck, as Foreign Minister, announced in Geneva, his country’s unilateral abrogation of the Minorities Treaty in force since 1919. The scholars listed below have studied separately either the birth of Poland and the imposition of the Minorities Protection Treaty, the rapprochement between Poland and Germany, or the situation of the Jews in Poland. However, they have paid scant attention to the nexus between the rise of Hitler, the rapprochement between Poland and Germany, the demise of the Minorities Protection Treaty, and the consequent worsening situation of Polish Jewry. -
Jewish Leadership and the Jews of Corinth in the Time of 2 Corinthians
The Politics of the Fifties: Jewish Leadership and the Jews of Corinth in the Time of 2 Corinthians Martin Goodman The Acts of the Apostles contain a graphic account of an attempt by the leaders of the Jewish community in Corinth to curb the activities of the apostle Paul: When Gallio was proconsul of Achaia, the Jews made a united attack on Paul and brought him before the tribunal. They said, “This man is per- suading people to worship God in ways that are contrary to the law”. Just as Paul was about to speak, Gallio said to the Jews, “If it were a matter of crime or serious villainy, I would be justified in accepting the complaint of you Jews; but since it is a matter of questions about words and names and your own law, see it to yourselves; I do not wish to be a judge of these matters”. And he dismissed them from the tribunal. Then all of them seized Sosthenes, the official of the synagogue, and beat him in front of the tribunal.1 This event, if the story is not a fictional creation by the author of Acts,2 can be dated quite precisely to the fifties ce because the period of Gallio’s tenure of the post of governor of the province of Achaia is known from an inscription.3 Whether the tensions that led the Corinthian Jews to invoke intervention by the governor were also the cause of the formal judicial punishments that Paul claimed in 2 Corinthians at around the same time to have suffered at the hands of officials of the Jewish court – ‘Five times I have received from the Jews the forty lashes minus one’4 – is not certain. -
Orientalia Christiana Periodica
YOLUMEN 57 FASCICULUS I 1991 ISSN 0030-5375 ORIENT ALI A CHRISTIANA PERIODICA COMMENTARII DE RE ORIENT ALI AETATIS CHRISTIANAE SACRA ET PROFANA EDITI CURA ET OPERE PONTIFICII INSTITUTI ORIENTALIUM STUDIORUM PONT. INSTITUTUM ORIENTALIUM STUDIORUM PIAZZA SANTA MARIA MAGGIORE, 7 ROMA 1991 SIGLA AASS Acta Sanctorum (Antverpiae et alibi 1643 ss.) AB Analecta Bollandiana ACO Eduardus Schwartz, Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum (Berolini 1914 ss.) AfO Archiv fur Orientforschung Assemani, BO Josephus Simonius Assemanus, Bibliotheca Orientalis Clementino- Vaticana (Roma 1719, 1721, 1725, 1728) (rep. Hildesheim 1975) AOC Archives de 1’Orient Chretien BHG FranIois Halkin, Bibliotheca Hagiographica Graeca (Bruxelles 19573) BHO Paul Peeters, Bibliotheca Hagiographica Orientalis (Bruxelles 1910) BO Bibliotheca Orientalis Brightman Frank Edward Brightman, Liturgies Eastern and Western, I: Eastern Liturgies (Oxford 1896) BSAC Bulletin de la Societe d’Archeologie Copte BV Bogoslovskij Vestnik Byzantion Byzantinische Zeitschrift CCG Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca (Tumhout 1971 ss.) CCL Corpus Christianorum, Series Lalina (Tumhout 1953 ss.) CerVed Cerkovnye Vedomosti Chr6t Christianskoe Clenie CICO Codex Iuris Canonici Orientalis (Citta del Vaticano 1957-1958) COD Conciliorum Oecumenicorum Decreta (Bologna 19733) ConcR Concilium Florentinum. Documenta et Scriptores voll. I-XI (Roma 1940-1976) , CPG Mauritius Geerard, Clavis Patrum Graecorum (Tumhbut 1974 ss.) CSCO Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium (Louvain 1903 ss.) CSEL Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum -
What's Jewish About Jewish Leadership? Https
What’s Jewish About Jewish Leadership? https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/whats-jewish-about-jewish-leadership By Dr. Hal M. Lewis The story is told about Abraham Lincoln who was said to have challenged an interlocutor with the riddle, “If you call a tail a leg how many legs does a dog have?” “Five,” he replied. “Wrong,” said Lincoln, “simply calling a tail a leg does not make it so!” I think about this “tale” every time I contemplate the explosion of offerings in our community purporting to be about Jewish leadership. Indeed, in this post-Passover season of counting, most of us can no longer count how many such programs exist. Legacy organizations, start-ups, foundations, synagogue movements, the innovation sector, everyone, it seems, is in the business of Jewish leadership. What is far less certain, however, is what it means to create meaningful leadership programming, or, as was asked of me not too long ago by a group of extremely thoughtful young Jewish leaders, “What’s Jewish about Jewish leadership?” The vast majority of leadership programs in American Jewish life today fall into one of two broad categories. (Spoiler alert, I am an advocate for a third approach, which I will describe shortly.) The first, involves providing those who run Jewish groups with insights into effective leadership as expounded in academic literature and corporate best practices. Here, “Jewish” is a demographic term describing the mission of the organizations and the ethnic/religious background of their employees and volunteers who participate in these training programs. The second category provides those who run Jewish organizations with an intensive educational experience that focuses on what can most appropriately be referred to as Jewish literacy: history, rituals, value concepts, philosophy, and the like. -
Teaching Jewish Law in American Law Schools–Part II: an Annotated Syllabus
© The Journal of International and Comparative Law at Chicago-Kent: Volume 2, 2002 1 Teaching Jewish Law in American Law Schools–Part II: An Annotated Syllabus Samuel J. Levine* INTRODUCTION In recent years, American legal scholarship has increasingly turned to the Jewish legal system as a source of comparison and contrast for questions that arise in American legal discourse.1 Concomitantly, a growing number of American law schools have introduced into their curriculum a course in Jewish Law. By some estimates, approximately thirty American law schools include courses in Jewish Law as part of their curriculum. 2 A number of different models * Research Professor of Law, St. John’s University School of Law; LL.M., Columbia University; J.D., Fordham University; Ordination, Yeshiva University; B.A., Yeshiva University. The syllabus presented here is a variation of the syllabi I have used in the Jewish Law courses I have taught at St. John’s University School of Law and Fordham University School of Law. I gratefully acknowledge that in compiling these syllabi, I gained from the advice and assistance of friends, colleague, and mentors, many of whom shared with me the syllabi they had used in teaching Jewish Law. In addition, I thank Abraham Abramovsky, with whom I taught the course at Fordham. I also note the recent appearance of a Jewish Law textbook for use in American law schools. See M ENACHEM ELON ET AL., JEWISH LAW (MISHPATIVRI): CASES AND M ATERIALS (1999). Although Professor Elon’s book represents a groundbreaking achievement and is a valuable source for any course in Jewish Law taught in an American law school, the book differs from my own syllabus in its emphasis on Jewish law in the context of modern Israeli law, an approach more consistent with the international law model that I incorporate into my syllabus to a considerably more limited degree. -
Jewish Leadership
Thu 11 June 2020 – 19 Sivan 5780 B”H Dr Maurice M. Mizrahi Congregation Adat Reyim Torah discussion on Behaalotecha Jewish Leadership Introduction In this week’s portion, Behaalotecha, the Israelites complain to Moses nonstop: Moses heard the people weeping, every clan apart, every person at the entrance of his tent. The Lord was very angry, and Moses was distressed. [Num. 11:10] Moses finally loses it: And Moses said to the Lord: “Why have You brought this trouble on Your servant? What have I done to displease you that you put the burden of all these people on me? Did I conceive this entire people? Did I give them birth, that You should say to me, “Carry them in your bosom as a nurse carries an infant”, to the land that You have promised on oath to their fathers? They whine before me and say, “Give us meat to eat!” Where am I to get meat to give to this entire people? I cannot carry this entire people by myself. It is too much for me. If this is how You are going to treat me, then, if I have found favor in Your eyes, kill me, and do not let me witness [their*] evil. [Num. 11:11-15] [*Torah says "my evil" as a euphemism [Sifrei Bamidbar 84:4] ] Why does Moses over-react? Moses didn't want the mission to begin with. He said to God: -Who am I, that I should go to Pharaoh and free the Israelites from Egypt? [Ex. 3:11] -What if they do not believe me and do not listen to me? [Ex. -
Leadership and Governance a URJ Resource and Discussion Guide to Move Your Congregation Forward
MOVING TO THE LEADING EDGE: VOLUME 2 Leadership and Governance A URJ Resource and Discussion Guide to Move Your Congregation Forward Building Communities. Reimagining Jewish Life. Foreword A lot of attention is paid these days to innovative start-ups in the Jewish world, and much of this attention is well-deserved. The energy and creativity being unleashed are both extraordinary and critical to the present and future of Jewish life in North America and, likely, worldwide. But too often, it is similarly assumed that because established institutions are, well, established, they are not innovating internally. Frankly, that’s not the case. At the Union for Reform Judaism (URJ), we spend our days engaging with congregational leaders representing the 900 congregations of the URJ, and I can tell you that there is significant innovation happening in synagogues across North America. The conventional wisdom has shifted. No longer are congregations waiting for the conveyor belt to deliver them new members. They realize that existing solely to sustain their institutions is not a long-term prospect for growth or even for survival. Instead, they now see that they must innovate, by transforming the way they create sacred community and meaningful Jewish experiences to have an impact on the participants and the world around them. More and more URJ congregations are experimenting, some of them on their own and some in partnership with other congregations. And it’s happening in congregations of all sizes and demographic profiles, all over North America. To achieve the innovation that needs to happen in congregations so they can continue to thrive, board members must be able to move beyond managing the day to day; they need to have generative conversations about the future of their congregation and increase the risks that they are willing to take. -
Choosing Jewish Fr Bk Cov 4/6/06 12:32 PM Page 1
Choosing Jewish fr bk cov 4/6/06 12:32 PM Page 1 CHOOSING JEWISH Conversations About SYLVIA BARACK FISHMAN Conversion Sylvia Barack Fishman American Jewish Committee The Jacob Blaustein Building 165 East 56 Street New York, NY 10022 The American Jewish Committee publishes in these areas: •Hatred and Anti-Semitism •Pluralism •Israel •American Jewish Life •International Jewish Life •Human Rights www.ajc.org April 2006 $5.00 AJC AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE CHOOSING JEWISH Conversations about Conversion Sylvia Barack Fishman The American Jewish Committee protects the rights and freedoms of Jews the world over; combats bigotry and anti- Semitism and promotes human rights for all; works for the security of Israel and deepened understanding between Americans and Israelis; advocates public policy positions rooted in American democratic values and the perspectives of the Jewish heritage; and enhances the creative vitality of the Jewish people. Founded in 1906, it is the pioneer human-relations agency in the United States. american jewish committee Contents Sylvia Barack Fishman is professor of Contemporary Jewish Life in Foreword v the Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Department at Brandeis Univer- Acknowledgments 1 sity and codirector of the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute. The present work, Choosing Jewish: Conversations about Conversion, carries forward Choosing Jewish: the discussion begun in Double or Nothing? Jewish Families and Mixed Conversations about Conversion Marriage (Brandeis University Press/University Press of New England, Introduction: Conversion Is Controversial 2004). in Contemporary Jewish Life 3 Why Study Conversion into Judaism? 3 Publication of this study was made possible in part by funds from the William Petschek National Jewish Family Center. -
Jewish Legal Theory and American Constitutional Theory: Some Comparisons and Contrasts Samuel J
Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 24 Article 4 Number 2 Winter 1997 1-1-1997 Jewish Legal Theory and American Constitutional Theory: Some Comparisons and Contrasts Samuel J. Levine Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Samuel J. Levine, Jewish Legal Theory and American Constitutional Theory: Some Comparisons and Contrasts, 24 Hastings Const. L.Q. 441 (1997). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol24/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jewish Legal Theory and American Constitutional Theory: Some Comparisons and Contrasts By SAMUEL J. LEvINE* Table of Contents I. An Introduction to Interpretation in Jewish Law, with References to American Constitutional Theory ......... 444 A. Sources and Methods of Interpretation ............. 447 1. Interpretations Revealed to Moses at Sinai ..... 447 2. Exegetical Interpretation of the Text ........... 448 3. Logic and Observation .......................... 448 4. Methods of Interpretation in Practice ........... 448 B. Interpretative Expansion and Limitation ............ 451 1. M itzvot ......................................... 451