Risks Associated with Harvesting and Human Consumption of Two Turtle Species in New Jersey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Risks Associated with Harvesting and Human Consumption of Two Turtle Species in New Jersey Montclair State University Montclair State University Digital Commons Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects 5-2017 Risks Associated with Harvesting and Human Consumption of Two Turtle Species in New Jersey Natalie R. Sherwood Montclair State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Sherwood, Natalie R., "Risks Associated with Harvesting and Human Consumption of Two Turtle Species in New Jersey" (2017). Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects. 46. https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/etd/46 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Montclair State University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Culminating Projects by an authorized administrator of Montclair State University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH HARVESTING AND HUMAN CONSUMPTION OF TWO TURTLE SPECIES IN NEW JERSEY A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of Montclair State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by NATALIE R. SHERWOOD Montclair State University Upper Montclair, NJ 2017 Dissertation Chair: Dr. Meiyin Wu Copyright © 2017 by Natalie R. Sherwood. All rights reserved. ABSTRACT RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH HUMAN CONSUMPTION AND HARVESTING OF TWO TURTLE SPECIES IN NEW JERSEY by Natalie R. Sherwood Snapping turtles and diamondback terrapins have unique life characteristics, making their populations’ survivorship heavily dependent upon the turtles that reach sexual maturity, limiting the harvest potential of turtles and making them vulnerable to exploitation. Therefore, this research tests mercury concentrations in diamondback terrapins and snapping turtles to determine if turtle meat should require human consumption advisories, and examines transport of mercury through the snapping turtle food web by testing prey items for mercury burden and mapping food webs using stable isotope composition. Consumption of New Jersey diamondback terrapins and snapping turtles pose a health risk. 25% of Cape May and 46% of Meadowlands terrapin muscle samples surpassed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency mercury threshold for fish consumption. For snapping turtles, Lake Wapalanne had the highest percent of turtle samples surpassing the threshold (36%), followed by Kearny Freshwater Marsh (33%) and Lake Hopatcong (28%). Based on the results of this study it is crucial to implement human consumption advisories for consumed turtle species. Neither the commercial or recreational harvest of snapping turtles in New Jersey is well understood. We therefore administered a survey to learn about current harvest iv practices, willingness of commercial and recreational harvesters to pay increased license fees, and their willingness to comply with new regulations. Respondents to the recreational harvest survey collected approximately 2,285 snapping turtles between 2012 and 2014. Respondents from the commercial harvesting survey reported collecting 1,506 turtles during the 2014 season. Commercial harvesters are willing to pay a higher permit price, up to $29.22, to keep their harvesting privileges. The results of this study suggest diamondback terrapin and snapping turtles pose a human consumption health risk due to elevated mercury concentrations. We suggest consumption advisories be developed for snapping turtles starting with locations of heavy harvest while advising the sensitive population to avoid the consumption of turtles. Based on the results of the harvest surveys we can suggest both recreational and commercial harvesters are willing to follow regulations in order to ensure future harvest. Harvesters are also willing to pay a higher permit price to keep their current harvesting privileges. v Acknowledgments The journey to the completion of this dissertation is owed to the many special people who provided their constant support and guidance. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Meiyin Wu, whose expertise, guidance, and support through my entire graduate education made this dissertation possible. I would also like to extend my most sincere gratitude to my committee Dr. Pankaj Lal, Dr. Peddrick Weis, Mr. Eric Stern and Dr. Stephanie Brachfeld for their constant encouragement and guidance. I would also like to thank, Brian Zarate for teaching me everything I know about turtles. Lisa Barno and the New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife for their constant support, which made this study possible. I am also extremely grateful to Dr. Michael Weinstein for his knowledge and assistance throughout this study. I would also like to extend a very special thanks to The Wetland Institute, Dr.’s Robert Wood, Patrick Baker, and Ralph Werner for providing terrapin specimens and showing me how to handle my first snapping turtle. Brett Bragin from the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission for always keeping a look out for any unfortunate road kill and providing terrapin specimens. I am highly indebted and grateful to Dr.’s Bill Thomas and Randy Fitzgerald, and everyone at the School of Conservation for assisting me throughout the years in site access and trap monitoring. I would not have been able to get the amount of the data I did without your constant support. Laurie Murphy and the Dow’s Boat Rental crew for all their help and assistance with trapping at Lake Hopatcong. vi I am extremely thankful to all my fellow graduate friends specially Kelly Triece for always helping me in the field and sharing the excitement of turtle trapping and handling. Pralhad Burli for your assistance in statistical analysis and Yaritza Acosta for your macroinvertebrate identification expertise. Lastly, and most importantly, I would like to thank my family and puppies for their constant understanding, love, and support especially during these last couple months as we also prepared for the arrival of our first baby. I would not have been able to complete this journey without you. vii Table of Contents Chapter 1. Turtle Life History, Threats, and Conservation ......................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Snapping Turtles (Chelydra serpentina) .................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Habitat and Distribution ............................................................................................. 4 1.2.2 Life History Characteristics ....................................................................................... 6 1.2.3 Status of the Common Snapping Turtle ..................................................................... 8 1.2.4 Human Impact on Snapping Turtles .......................................................................... 8 1.2.5 Snapping Turtle Harvest ............................................................................................ 9 1.2.6 Snapping Turtle Harvest in New Jersey................................................................... 16 1.3 Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) ...................................................... 20 1.3.1 Habitat and Distribution ........................................................................................... 20 1.3.2 Life History Characteristics ..................................................................................... 21 1.3.3 Status of the Diamondback Terrapin ....................................................................... 22 1.3.4 Human Impact on Diamondback Terrapins ............................................................. 23 1.3.5 Diamondback Terrapins Harvest ............................................................................. 24 1.3.6 Diamondback Terrapin Harvest in New Jersey ....................................................... 25 1.4 Mercury ..................................................................................................................... 25 1.4.1 Mercury Behavior and Pathways in the Physical Environment............................... 27 1.4.2 Mercury in the Aquatic Food Web .......................................................................... 28 1.4.3 Mercury Concentration in a Snapping Turtle Food webs ........................................ 31 1.4.4 Human Health Risks ................................................................................................ 32 1.5. Stable Isotope Analysis ............................................................................................ 34 1.6 Research Objectives .................................................................................................. 36 1.7 Literature Cited ........................................................................................................ 38 Chapter 2. Human Health Implications of Mercury Concentrations in Diamondback Terrapins ......................................................................................................................... 51 2.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 51 2.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 52 viii 2.2.1 Human Health Risk .................................................................................................. 53 2.2.2
Recommended publications
  • The Common Snapping Turtle, Chelydra Serpentina
    The Common Snapping Turtle, Chelydra serpentina Rylen Nakama FISH 423: Olden 12/5/14 Figure 1. The Common Snapping Turtle, one of the most widespread reptiles in North America. Photo taken in Quebec, Canada. Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/yorthopia/7626614760/. Classification Order: Testudines Family: Chelydridae Genus: Chelydra Species: serpentina (Linnaeus, 1758) Previous research on Chelydra serpentina (Phillips et al., 1996) acknowledged four subspecies, C. s. serpentina (Northern U.S. and Figure 2. Side profile of Chelydra serpentina. Note Canada), C. s. osceola (Southeastern U.S.), C. s. the serrated posterior end of the carapace and the rossignonii (Central America), and C. s. tail’s raised central ridge. Photo from http://pelotes.jea.com/AnimalFact/Reptile/snapturt.ht acutirostris (South America). Recent IUCN m. reclassification of chelonians based on genetic analyses (Rhodin et al., 2010) elevated C. s. rossignonii and C. s. acutirostris to species level and established C. s. osceola as a synonym for C. s. serpentina, thus eliminating subspecies within C. serpentina. Antiquated distinctions between the two formerly recognized North American subspecies were based on negligible morphometric variations between the two populations. Interbreeding in the overlapping range of the two populations was well documented, further discrediting the validity of the subspecies distinction (Feuer, 1971; Aresco and Gunzburger, 2007). Therefore, any emphasis of subspecies differentiation in the ensuing literature should be disregarded. Figure 3. Front-view of a captured Chelydra Continued usage of invalid subspecies names is serpentina. Different skin textures and the distinctive pink mouth are visible from this angle. Photo from still prevalent in the exotic pet trade for C.
    [Show full text]
  • Snapping Turtle, Chelydra Serpentina, Overland Movements Near the Southeastern Extent of Its Range David A
    Georgia Journal of Science Volume 68 No. 2 Scholarly Contributions from the Article 11 Membership and Others 2010 Snapping Turtle, Chelydra serpentina, Overland Movements Near the Southeastern Extent of its Range David A. Steen [email protected] Sean C. Sterrett Aubrey M. Heupel Lora L. Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Steen, David A.; Sterrett, Sean C.; Heupel, Aubrey M.; and Smith, Lora L. (2010) "Snapping Turtle, Chelydra serpentina, Overland Movements Near the Southeastern Extent of its Range," Georgia Journal of Science, Vol. 68, No. 2, Article 11. Available at: https://digitalcommons.gaacademy.org/gjs/vol68/iss2/11 This Research Articles is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ the Georgia Academy of Science. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia Journal of Science by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ the Georgia Academy of Science. 196 Steen et al.: Snapping Turtle Overland Movements SNAPPING Turtle, CHELYDRA SERPENTINA, OVERLAND MOVEMENTS NEAR THE SOUTHEASTERN EXTENT OF ITS RANGE David A. Steen1,2*, Sean C. Sterrett2, Aubrey M. Heupel2 and Lora L. Smith2 1Auburn University, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn, Alabama, 36849 2Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center Route 2, Box 2324, Newton, GA 39870 Institution at which work was completed: Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Terrestrial movements of turtles are of interest due to the conserva- tion implications for this imperiled group and the general lack of information on this topic, particularly in wide-ranging species.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtles of the Upper Mississippi River System
    TURTLES OF THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM Tom R. Johnson and Jeffrey T. Briggler Herpetologists Missouri Department of Conservation Jefferson City, MO March 27, 2012 Background: A total of 13 species and subspecies of turtles are known to live in the Upper Mississippi River, its backwaters and tributaries. There are a few species that could be found occasionally, but would likely account for less than 5% of the species composition of any area. These species are predominantly marsh animals and are discussed in a separate section of this paper. For additional information on turtle identification and natural history see Briggler and Johnson (2006), Christiansen and Bailey (1988), Conant and Collins (1998), Ernst and Lovich (2009), Johnson (2000), and Vogt (1981). This information is provided to the fisheries field staff of the LTRM project so they will be able to identify the turtles captured during fish monitoring. The most current taxonomic information of turtles was used to compile this material. The taxonomy followed in this publication is the Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding (6th edition) by Crothers (2008). Species Identification, Natural History and Distribution: What follows is a synopsis of the 13 turtle species and subspecies which are known to occur in the Upper Mississippi River environs. Species composition changes between the upper and lower reaches of the LTRM study area (Wisconsin/Minnesota state line and southeastern Missouri) due to changes in aquatic habitats. For example, the Northern Map Turtle (Graptemys geographica) is abundant in the northern portion of the river with clearer water and abundant snail prey.
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles
    A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks This publication may be cited as: Bandas, Sarah J., and Kenneth F. Higgins. 2004. Field Guide to South Dakota Turtles. SDCES EC 919. Brookings: South Dakota State University. Copies may be obtained from: Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University Box 2140B, NPBL Brookings SD 57007-1696 South Dakota Dept of Game, Fish & Parks 523 E. Capitol, Foss Bldg Pierre SD 57501 SDSU Bulletin Room ACC Box 2231 Brookings, SD 57007 (605) 688–4187 A Field Guide to SOUTH DAKOTA TURTLES EC919 South Dakota State University | Cooperative Extension Service | USDA U.S. Geological Survey | South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota Department of Game, Fish & Parks Sarah J. Bandas Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Kenneth F. Higgins U.S. Geological Survey South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit South Dakota State University NPB Box 2140B Brookings, SD 57007 Contents 2 Introduction . .3 Status of South Dakota turtles . .3 Fossil record and evolution . .4 General turtle information . .4 Taxonomy of South Dakota turtles . .9 Capturing techniques . .10 Turtle handling . .10 Turtle habitats . .13 Western Painted Turtle (Chrysemys picta bellii) . .15 Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) . .17 Spiny Softshell Turtle (Apalone spinifera) . .19 Smooth Softshell Turtle (Apalone mutica) . .23 False Map Turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) . .25 Western Ornate Box Turtle (Terrapene ornata ornata) .
    [Show full text]
  • North Louisiana Refuges Complex: Freshwater Turtle Inventory
    NORTH LOUISIANA REFUGES COMPLEX: FRESHWATER TURTLE INVENTORY USFWS Award No: F17PX01556 John L. Carr, Aaron C. Johnson & J. Benjamin Grizzle November 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Inventory and Monitoring Branch for USFWS Award No. F17PX01556, “Freshwater Turtle Inventory of the North Louisiana Refuges Complex”. In addition, this report incorporates data from other, complementary projects that were funded by a variety of sources. This has been done in order to provide a more fulsome picture of knowledge on the turtle fauna of the refuges within the Complex. These other projects were funded in part by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Federal Aid, through the State Wildlife Grants Program (series of projects targeting the Alligator Snapping Turtle and map turtles). Other sources include data collected for grant activities funded by USGS-BRD (Cooperative Agreement No. 99CRAG0017), funding from the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Foundation beginning in 1998, funding directly from LDWF (2000-2002), The Nature Conservancy (contract #LAFO_022309), Friends of Black Bayou, the Turtle Research Fund of the University of Louisiana at Monroe Foundation, and the Kitty DeGree Professorship in Biology (2011-2017). U.S. Fish and Wildlife personnel helped facilitate our work by granting access to all parts of the refuges at various times, and providing a series of Special Use Permits over 20+ years. We acknowledge Lee Fulton, Joe McGowan, Brett Hortman, Kelby Ouchley, and George Chandler for facilitating our work on refuges over the years; in particular, we thank Gypsy Hanks for long-sustained support and cooperation, especially during the course of the current project.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtles Are Reptiles--Kin to Snakes, Lizards, Alligators, and Crocodiles
    Nature Series The Monmouth County Park System has two envi- ronmental centers dedicated to nature education. Introduction Each has a trained staff of naturalists to answer Turtles are reptiles--kin to snakes, lizards, alligators, and crocodiles. However, they carry part of visitor questions and a variety of displays, exhibits, their skeleton on the outside of their bodies, which makes them unique from most other animals. and hands-on activities where visitors of all ages Turtles Plus, with a lifespan of up to 80 years for some local species, they are very special indeed! can learn about area wildlife and natural history. of Monmouth County As with other reptiles, turtles are ectothermic (also known as “cold-blooded”), which means they use their surroundings The Huber Woods Environmental Center, on to regulate body temperature. To cool off, they burrow in Brown’s Dock Road in the Locust Section of the mud or hide under Middletown, features newly renovated exhibits vegetation. To warm up, about birds, plants, wildlife and the Lenape Indians. they bask in the sun. In Miles of surrounding trails offer many opportunities winter, all reptiles in our to enjoy and view nature. area must hibernate to survive the cold. Turtle Tales is a popular program offered by Park System Naturalists-here a baby painted turtle is displayed. Spend some time in the parks, especially near the water, and you will have to try hard NOT to see Painted Turtles. Threats to Turtles Road mortality is a threat to many local Bog Turtle, continued habitat destruction The Manasquan Reservoir Environmental Center, species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alligator Snapping Turtle (Macrochelys Temminckii) Is the Largest Freshwater Turtle in North America
    TheThe AlligatorAlligator SnappingSnapping TurtleTurtle [[MacrochelysMacrochelys ((MacroclemysMacroclemys)) temminckiitemminckii]:]: A review of ecology, life history, and conservation, with demographic analyses of the sustainability of take from wild populations a report to: Division of Scientific Authority United States Fish and Wildlife Service prepared by: Robert N. Reed, PhD Justin Congdon, PhD J. Whitfield Gibbons, PhD Savannah River Ecology Laboratory Drawer E Aiken SC 29802 USA ...Table of Contents... Executive summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 2 Taxonomy, distribution, and systematics................................................................................................. 2 Ecology and Natural History ................................................................................................................... 3 Size and growth rates ............................................................................................................... 3 Longevity and age at first reproduction ..................................................................................... 3 Reproductive biology ................................................................................................................ 4 Survivorship ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Snapping Turtle
    Pennsylvania Amphibians & Reptiles TTheh e SSnappingn a p p i n g T u r t l e by Andrew L. Shiels Turtles are members of the Class Reptilia, Order Testudi- snapping turtles are primarily nocturnal (active at night). nata. They are the oldest living reptiles, having evolved Most turtles are omnivorous—they feed on a wide variety more than 200 million years ago. of foods including insects, fi sh, small mammals, carrion, Turtles have adapted to a variety of environments in- berries, aquatic vegetation and plants. cluding marine, estuarine, freshwater and terrestrial habi- Turtles vary in size from species that are several inches in tats. They are found on every continent except Antarctica. length to those that are over 6 feet (sea turtles and giant tor- Although their habitats may differ, all turtles share these toises). The common snapping turtle is the largest Penn- same characteristics: 1) a shell, 2) they lay eggs, and 3) sylvania turtle. Adult snappers can reach a shell length of they build nests on land to incubate their eggs. 12 inches and typically weigh between 15 and 45 pounds. The most unique feature of a turtle is its shell. The Not only can they reach outstanding weights, but tur- shell’s shape, color and pattern make it a readily used fea- tles also live longer than most other vertebrates. Some box ture for species identifi cation. The shell is divided into turtles have had recorded life spans of longer than a cen- an upper part, the carapace, and a lower part, the plas- tury.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtle Odyssey | Educator Guide 1 Sk Films
    EDUCATOR GUIDE TURTLE ODYSSEY | EDUCATOR GUIDE 1 SK FILMS Sea turtles also have an impact on the beaches and dune Background Information areas that humans enjoy for recreation. During much of the year, there are few nutrients in dune areas because sand for Educators does not retain nutrients well. Sea turtles nest on beaches and lower dunes, depositing many eggs in the sand. In a 20 mile stretch of beach along the Florida cost, sea turtles can Sea turtles are one of our planet’s most ancient species. lay 150,000 pounds of eggs. Not all of the eggs will hatch and Tey have existed on Earth for over 100 million years. During not all hatched turtles will make it to the ocean. Any eggs or that time, there have been relatively few changes to these hatchlings that remain on the beach are an excellent source of marine turtles. Despite their long history, sea turtles are now a nutrients that remain in the sand. Tese nutrients allow dune vulnerable group in danger of becoming extinct. With sea tur- vegetation to grow, which stabilizes the dunes and prevents tles struggling to survive, we need to understand more about them from eroding away. As with any ecosystem, maintain- the environment and the condition of the Earth’s ecosystems. ing the dunes and their vegetation is important for the many As more research is done and more people become concerned organisms that live in the area. about the sea turtles, we have an opportunity not only to save Sea turtles are an important part of two ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Conserving Oregon's Native Turtles Including Best
    GUIDANCE FOR CONSERVING OREGON’S NATIVE TURTLES INCLUDING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES the OREGON CONSERVATION STRATEGY the intent of this document is to facilitate better protection and conservation of oregon’s native turtles and their habitats. This document includes recommended Best Management Practices (BMPs) for protecting and conserving Oregon’s two native turtle species, the western painted turtle and the western pond turtle. While there are opportunities for all Oregonians to become more knowledgeable about and participate in turtle conservation efforts, this document is intended primarily for use by natural resource and land managers, land use planners, and project managers. 7KHGRFXPHQWKDVEHHQSHHUUHYLHZHGDQGWKH%03VDUHVXSSRUWHGE\VFLHQWLÀFDOO\VRXQG information. The BMPs are intended to be practical and cost-effective so that they can be readily used. Adherence to these BMPs does not necessarily constitute compliance with all applicable federal, state, or local laws. Acknowledgements This document was produced by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) with VLJQLÀFDQWÀQDQFLDODQGGHVLJQFRQWULEXWLRQVIURP7KH3RUWRI3RUWODQG,QSXWDQGWHFKQLFDO review was provided by the Oregon Native Turtle Working Group which is comprised of representatives from a variety of natural resource agencies, organizations, and institutions. This document arose out of a recommendation from the 2009 Native Turtle Conservation Forum, organized by the Oregon Native Turtle Working Group and hosted by the Oregon Zoo. More information about the Oregon Native Turtle
    [Show full text]
  • Common Snapping Turtle Fact Sheet
    WILDLIFE IN CONNECTICUT WILDLIFE FACT SHEET Common Snapping Turtle Chelydra s. serpentina Background Snapping turtles are widespread in Connecticut. Their ability to adapt to J. FUSCO © PAUL people and the state's changing landscape has made them evolutionarily successful. Snapping turtles can even be found in polluted waters and urban wetlands, although populations in these habitats may not be robust. Range Snapping turtles range across the eastern United States to the Rocky Mountains, from southern Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, and into Central America. They have been introduced in some western states. Description Connecticut’s largest freshwater turtle is easily spiders, worms, fish, frogs, small turtles, snakes, birds, recognized by its dark carapace (upper shell) with a crayfish, small mammals, and carrion. Plant matter deeply serrated back margin, and a small plastron accounts for about a third of the diet. Young turtles will (bottom shell) that does not completely cover all of forage for food, but older turtles often hang motionless in the animal's flesh. Three low keels (or ridges) on the the water and ambush their prey by lunging forward with carapace of younger turtles often become obscure as the head at high speed and powerful jaws to seize prey. the turtle matures. The carapace measures 8-12 inches on an average adult, and the turtles can weigh between Life History 10-35 pounds. The carapace can vary in color, from Sexual maturity has more to do with size than age. green to brown to black; sometimes it is covered with Turtles are ready to mate when their carapace measures moss.
    [Show full text]
  • Snapping Turtle (Chelydra Serpentina) in Canada
    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) in Canada Snapping Turtle 2016 Recommended citation: Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016. Management Plan for the Snapping Turtle (Chelydra serpentina) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Ottawa, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, iv + 39 p. For copies of the management plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry.1 Cover illustration: © Philippe Blais, Vigile Verte Également disponible en français sous le titre « Plan de gestion de la tortue serpentine (Chelydra serpentina) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2016. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca Management Plan for the Snapping Turtle 2016 Preface The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996)2 agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c. 29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of management plans for listed species of special concern and are required to report on progress within five years after the publication of the final document on the SAR Public Registry.
    [Show full text]