DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Richard Bellamy Table of Contents 1. Personal Details ..................................................................................................................... 3 2. Career .......................................................................................................................................... 3 I Education and General Academic Record ............................................................................ 3 II Academic Appointments .............................................................................................................. 4 III Visiting Appointments ................................................................................................................. 4 IV Other Positions ................................................................................................................................ 5 V Prizes and Honours ......................................................................................................................... 5 3. Publications .............................................................................................................................. 6 I Books ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 a) Monographs ........................................................................................................................................ 6 b) Edited Books and Journal Special Issues ............................................................................ 6 c) Scholarly Editions of Books ....................................................................................................... 8 II Articles, Book Chapters and Working Papers ................................................................. 8 a) Refereed Journal Articles ........................................................................................................... 9 b) Review Articles, Short Articles, Replies and Comments, and Introductions to Special Issues .................................................................................................................................. 15 c) Book Chapters, including Long Encyclopaedia and Handbook Entries ............ 18 d) Working Papers and Reports ................................................................................................. 25 e) Short Encyclopaedia Entries and Other Occasional Pieces .................................... 26 III In Press/Accepted for Publication ...................................................................................... 28 IV Submitted and Prospective Projects ................................................................................. 28 a) Papers/Books Submitted or Being Revised .................................................................... 28 b) Papers/Books in Draft ............................................................................................................... 29 c) Papers/Books under Contract ............................................................................................... 29 d) Planned Papers/Books ............................................................................................................... 29 4. Research Grants ................................................................................................................... 29 I Projects ................................................................................................................................................. 29 II Other ..................................................................................................................................................... 30 5. Administration ..................................................................................................................... 31 6. Teaching ................................................................................................................................... 34 7. Phd Students and Post-doctoral Fellows ............................................................... 35 8. External Activities .............................................................................................................. 35 I Professional Service ....................................................................................................................... 35 II Refereeing: Prize Committees/Journals/Research Grants ..................................... 36 III Conference Organisation .......................................................................................................... 36 IV Editorships ....................................................................................................................................... 37 V Reviews ................................................................................................................................................ 37 VI Invited Conference and Seminar Papers ......................................................................... 37 VII External Examining .................................................................................................................... 38 VIII External Assessor for Chairs, Academic Promotions, REF ................................ 38 ‘ 1 IX Knowledge Transfer ................................................................................................................... 38 a) Talks to Non Academic Audiences ...................................................................................... 38 b) Radio and TV ................................................................................................................................... 40 c) Consultation ..................................................................................................................................... 40 d) Newspaper Articles ..................................................................................................................... 40 e) Blogs ..................................................................................................................................................... 41 9. Research Plans ...................................................................................................................... 42 10. Referees ................................................................................................................................. 44 Appendix 1 Selected Reviews of Monographs, Edited Books and Scholarly Editions .......................................................................................................................................... 46 I Monographs ........................................................................................................................................ 46 II Edited Books ..................................................................................................................................... 49 III Editions of Books .......................................................................................................................... 53 Appendix 2 Invited Talks Post January 2013 ............................................................ 54 ‘ 2 1. Personal Details Name: Richard Paul Bellamy Address (EUI) European University Institute, Via dei Roccettini, 9 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Telephone [+39] 055 4685 809 Mobile +39 348 0296273 Email [email protected] Address (UCL) Department of Political Science School of Public Policy University College London 29/30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU UK Email [email protected] Mobile +44 (0) 7763 174423 Nationality British Date of Birth 15.6.57 2. Career I Education and General Academic Record 1976-9 Trinity Hall, Cambridge History BA Hons `First' Charles Crawley Prizeman College Scholarship 1979-83 Graduate Student, Trinity Hall, Cambridge 1980-82 Researcher, Social and Political Science Department, European University Institute (EUI), Florence, Italy. ‘ 3 1982-3 Leverhulme Study Abroad Studentship, Italy. 1983 Cambridge PhD awarded in History for thesis on "Liberalism and Historicism - History and Politics in the Thought of Benedetto Croce" (October 1983) [Supervisor: Prof Quentin Skinner, Examiners: Dr Jonathan Steinberg (Cambridge) and Prof Maurice Cranston (LSE/EUI)] II Academic Appointments 1981-82 Lecturer, Pisa University, Italy. 1983-86 E.S.R.C. Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Nuffield College, Oxford (Junior Dean, 1985-6) 1984-86 Lecturer in the House of Politics, Christ Church, Oxford. 1986-8 Fellow and College Lecturer in History, Jesus College, Cambridge and Lector, Trinity College, Cambridge. 1988-92 University Lecturer in Politics, University of Edinburgh. 1992-96 Professor of Politics, University of East Anglia. 1996-2002 Professor of Politics and International Relations, University of Reading. (Head of Department 1996-2000, Director Graduate School of European and International Studies 1999-2001) 2002-05 Professor of Government, University of Essex 2005 - Professor of Political Science, University College, London (UCL). (Director of the School of Public Policy and founding Head of Political Science Department, 2005-10, founding Director of the European Institute 2010-13), Extended leave 2014-2019 2014-2019 Director of the Max Weber Programme, European University Institute (EUI), Florence, Italy III Visiting Appointments March 1993 British Council sponsored visitor, Department of Public and Social Administration,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dr. Theodore George Professor and Head Department of Philosophy
    Dr. Theodore George Professor and Head Department of Philosophy Texas A&M University [email protected] Areas of specialization: Gadamer, contemporary hermeneutics, contemporary continental ethics, philosophy of art and aesthetics, Hegel, German Idealism and Romanticism Areas of competence: continental European philosophy since Kant, the history of Western philosophy Education: Ph.D. in Philosophy, Villanova University, 2000 Dissertation: “Hegel’s Speculative Theory of Political Life: Community and Tragedy in the Phenomenology of Spirit” Committee: Dr. Dennis Schmidt (Director), Dr. Walter Brogan, Dr. Julie Klein Fulbright Fellow, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 1998–1999 Host: Prof. Dr. Günter Figal M.A. in Philosophy, Villanova University, 1997 B.A. in Philosophy and German (double major), Whitman College, 1993 Cum Laude, with honors and distinction in Philosophy and with distinction in German Thesis: “The Structure of Rebirth in Walden: A Connection with Thus Spoke Zarathustra” Appointments: Head, Department of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, 2015–present (Research leave 2018–2019; Interim Head 2014–2015) Professor of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, 2020–present Associate Professor of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, 2007–2020 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, 2001–2007 Honorary Appointment: Senior Researcher, College of Fellows, Philosophy Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia, 2016–present Editorial Positions: Editor, Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 2012–present
    [Show full text]
  • Hegel's Philosophy of Biology?
    Article title: Hegel’s Philosophy of Biology? A Programmatic Overview Short title: Hegel’s Philosophy of Biology? Article type: Research article Authors: Andrea Gambarotto (corresponding) & Luca Illetterati Affiliation: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, UC Louvain, Belgium Email: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents what we call ‘Hegel’s philosophy of biology’ to a target audience of both Hegel scholars and philosophers of biology. It also serves to introduce a special issue of the Hegel Bulletin entirely dedicated to a first mapping of this yet to be explored domain of Hegel studies. We submit that Hegel’s philosophy of biology can be understood as a radicalization of the Kantian approach to organisms, and as prefiguring current philosophy of biology in important ways, especially with regard to the nature of biological organization, the role of teleology in biological explanation, and the relation between life and cognition. 1 I. Introduction The concept of life is a key concept of classical German philosophy as a whole and it would be reductive to think of it only in biological terms. The attention to the notion of life in the post-Kantian debate has a critical function with respect to all forms of dualism that have marked modern philosophy: those between soul and body, thought and world, and therefore, of course, spirit and nature. Life is, in fact, for post-Kantian philosophers, an embodied soul or an animated body, a mind that is never entirely separated from nature. From the very beginning of his philosophical quest, Hegel’s work presents itself as a ‘philosophy of life’, that is a philosophy that must do justice to the multiform experience of life, without falling into the abstract image provided by the intellect (Verstand), where the dynamism and vitality (Lebendigkeit) of concrete reality gets lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Eligible Journals (PDF)
    Last Update: 2021-07-08 CUP Open Access Agreement UNIVIE 2020-01-01 until 2022-12-31 Eligible Journals Acta Neuropsychiatrica Acta Numerica Advances in Archaeological Practice Africa African Studies Review Ageing & Society Agricultural and Resource Economics Review AI EDAM AJIL Unbound American Antiquity American Journal of International Law American Journal of Law & Medicine American Political Science Review Americas Anatolian Studies Ancient Mesoamerica Anglo-Saxon England Animal Health Research Reviews Annals of Actuarial Science Annals of Glaciology Annual Review of Applied Linguistics Antarctic Science Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology Antiquaries Journal Antiquity ANZIAM Journal Applied Psycholinguistics APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing Arabic Sciences and Philosophy Archaeological Dialogues Archaeological Reports Architectural History arq: Architectural Research Quarterly Art Libraries Journal Asian Journal of Comparative Law Asian Journal of International Law Asian Journal of Law and Society ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education page 1 of 8 Australian Journal of Environmental Education Australian Journal of Indigenous Education Austrian History Yearbook Behaviour Change Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy Behavioural Public Policy Bilingualism: Language and Cognition Biological Imaging Bird Conservation International BJHS Themes BJPsych Advances BJPsych Bulletin BJPsych International BJPsych Open Brain Impairment Britannia British
    [Show full text]
  • Italy: "Foreign Tax Policies and Economic Growth"
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Foreign Tax Policies and Economic Growth Volume Author/Editor: NBER and The Brookings Institution Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-470-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/unkn66-1 Publication Date: 1966 Chapter Title: Italy: "Foreign Tax Policies and Economic Growth" Chapter Author: Francesco Forte Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1543 Chapter pages in book: (p. 165 - 206) Italy FRANCESCO FORTE UNIVERSITY OF TURIN I. POSTWAR ECONOMIC GROWTH The postwar economic growth of Italy has been remarkable com- pared with that of other industrialized countries, as well as with that of most previous periods in Italian economic history. Between 1951 and 1962, Italy's national income increased at a rate of about 6 per cent per annum in current lire, and the country's growth rate both in real and in per capita terms was almost as high. Prices were relatively stable through 1961; wholesale prices did not change, while retail prices rose only moderately. Population rose by only 6.5 per cent from 1951 to 1961, mainly as a result of a continuous re- duction in the mortality rate, owing to better sanitary conditions, to social assistance, and to an improved standard of living. This high and steady growth rate combined with reasonably sta- ble prices may suggest that the growth process has been essentially sound and that it has been supported by a good tax system and fa- vorable tax policies. This is not so.
    [Show full text]
  • Kierkegaard's Socrates: a Venture in Evolutionary Theory.” Modern Theology 17(4): 442-473
    1 THE PROBLEM OF KIERKEGAARD ’S SOCRATES DANIEL WATTS This essay re-examines Kierkegaard’s view of Socrates. I consider the problem that arises from Kierkegaard’s appeal to Socrates as an exemplar for irony. The problem is that he also appears to think that, as an exemplar for irony, Socrates cannot be represented. And part of the problem is the paradox of self-reference that immediately arises from trying to represent x as unrepresentable. On the solution I propose, Kierkegaard does not hold that, as an exemplar for irony, Socrates is in no way representable. Rather, he holds that, as an exemplar for irony, Socrates cannot be represented in a purely disinterested way. I show how, in The Concept of Irony , Kierkegaard makes use of ‘limiting cases’ of representation in order to bring Socrates into view as one who defies purely disinterested representation. I also show how this approach to Socrates connects up with Kierkegaard’s more general interest in the problem of ethical exemplarity, where the problem is how ethical exemplars can be given as such, that is, in such a way that purely disinterested contemplation is not the appropriate response to them. Socrates … this puzzling, uncategorizable, inexplicable phenomenon (Nietzsche) A plausible general hypothesis about Kierkegaard is that he modelled his work as an author on Socrates. This supposition helps to explain many features of his work: his self- withdrawing and maieutic gestures, his focus on ethical self-knowledge, his eye for paradoxes, his animus against those he regarded as modern-day sophists, his professions of ignorance. 1 Further, 1 This hypothesis has long guided Kierkegaard studies, going back at least to David Swenson’s way of introducing Kierkegaard to Anglophone readers, in the 1940s, as a “Danish Socrates” (1983 [1941]).
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit's Embeddedness in Nature: Hegel's Decentring of Self-Legislation
    doi:10.1017/hgl.2020.33 Hegel Bulletin, Page 1 of 20 © The Hegel Society of Great Britain, 2021 Spirit’s Embeddedness in Nature: Hegel’s Decentring of Self-Legislation Heikki Ikäheimo Abstract A recently widely accepted view has it that the nature-spirit distinction in Hegel is to be understood as a distinction between a space or realm that is not normative, or does not involve norms, and one that is or does. Notwithstanding the merits of this view, it has tended to create a separation between nature and spirit which is both philosophically troubling and difficult to reconcile with the picture of Hegel as the arch enemy of abstract or unreconciled dualisms. In this paper I aim to show that the defining phenomenon for this view—collective self-government by norms—is on Hegel’s account both dependent on living nature that involves normativity broadly conceived all the way down and also subject to the ultimate normative or evaluative principle of Hegel’s Philosophy of Spirit —concrete freedom—the essence of spirit according to him. This is to say that for Hegel the normativity of collectively administered norms is neither the most basic nor the highest form of normativity. I. Introduction The view according to which Geist or ‘spirit’ in Hegel stands for some metaphys- ically suspicious, spooky entity, transcendent principle behind the appearing world, or a neo-Platonic One whose emanation the world is, has been out of favour for quite some time now. The recently widely accepted view, one that has demarcated itself against the first mentioned one, is that ‘spirit’ in fact stands for the Sellarsian ‘space of reasons’, or as it is often put the ‘space or realm of norms’ or the ‘nor- mative realm’.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachel Elizabeth Zuckert Department of Philosophy 5728 N. Kenmore
    Rachel Elizabeth Zuckert Department of Philosophy 5728 N. Kenmore Ave, 3N Northwestern University Chicago, IL 60660 Kresge 3-512 1880 Campus Drive home: (773) 728-7927 Evanston, IL 60208 work: (847) 491-2556 [email protected] Education: 2000 PhD, University of Chicago, Department of Philosophy and the Committee on Social Thought 1995 MA, University of Chicago, Committee on Social Thought 1992 B.A. (1), Oxford University (Philosophy and Modern Languages) 1990 B.A. (Summa Cum Laude; Highest Honors in Philosophy; Phi Beta Kappa), Williams College Areas of Specialization: Kant and eighteenth-century philosophy Aesthetics Areas of Competence: Early modern philosophy Nineteenth-century philosophy Feminist philosophy Languages: French German Academic Employment: 2018- Professor of Philosophy, Northwestern University; affiliated with the German Department 2008-18 Associate Professor of Philosophy, Northwestern University; affiliated with the German Department 2011-18 2006-2008 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Northwestern University 2001-2006 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Rice University 1999-2001 Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Bucknell University Zuckert 2 Publications: Books Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment, Cambridge University Press, 2007. Awarded the American Society for Aesthetics Monograph Prize (2008); reviewed in British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Comparative and Continental Philosophy, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, Journal of the History of Philosophy, Metascience, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, Review of Metaphysics, and subject of review essays in Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and Kant Yearbook Herder’s Naturalist Aesthetics, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming (2019). Edited Volume Hegel on Philosophy in History, co-edited with James Kreines, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Hegelian Metaphysics John W. Burbidge
    C Abstract: With the recent suspicion of metaphysics it is easy to be C R R I embarrassed by Hegel’s suggestion that his Logic is also a metaphysics. I S In this paper I want to argue that his conception of metaphysics is S The Future of I I S still highly relevant, and suggest some ways it could be developed S further. I start by suggesting how Hegel justifies his claim, and why & that justification still retains a measure of plausibility. Then I turn to & Hegelian MetaphysicsC a discussion of what we mean by cause, and how Hegel’s analyses of C R necessity, cause and reciprocity transform this concept in ways which are R I I T relevant to current developments in science. T I I Q Q U Keywords: Logic, Metaphysics, Cause, Necessity, Reciprocity U E E / I / John W. Burbidge In his Encyclopaedia Logic Hegel observes that his “Logic coincides Volume 4 / Volume 4 / Issue 1 with metaphysics, with the science of things grasped in thought that used Issue 1 to be taken to express the essentialities of things.”1 For all that the logic is the system of pure thought, these thoughts are not the empty categories of Kant’s transcendental philosophy, but the Logic “contains thought in so far as this thought is equally the fact (or object [Miller]) as it is in itself; or the fact (or object) in itself insofar as this is equally pure thought.” 2 The term translated by di Giovanni as “fact” and by Miller as “object” is the notorious Sache selbst.
    [Show full text]
  • Note to Users
    NOTE TO USERS The original manuscript received by UMI contains broken, slanted and or light print. All efforts were made to acquire the highest quality manuscript from the author or school. Pages were microfilmed as received. This reproduction is the best copy available UMI COMMUNITARIAN LOYALTIES IN A BORDERLESS WORLD: GLOBALlZATlON AND POLITICAL ALLEGJANCES IN BELGIUM, CANADA AND ITALY Livianna Stephanie Tossutti A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto O Copyright by Livianna Stephanie Tossutti (1998) National Library Bibliothèque nationale of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. nie Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Onawa ON KI A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une ticence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or seil reproduire, prêter, disîribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic fonnats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othecwise de celle-ci ne
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Allison, H. E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defence, Yale University Press (2004). Allison, H. E. ‘Morality and Freedom: Kant’s Reciprocity Thesis’, The Philosophical Review, 95, 3, (1986), 393–425. Allison, H. E. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, Oxford University Press (2011). Allison, H. E. Kant’s Theory of Freedom, Cambridge University Press (1990). Allison, H. E. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary, Oxford University Press (2011), 275–6. Allport, G. W. and Postman, L. Psychology of Rumor, Henry Hold & Co. (1947). Ameriks, K. ‘Kant, Miracles, and Religion, Parts One and Two’, in Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Critical Guide, ed. G. E. Michalson, Cambridge University Press (2014), 137–55. Anderson, D. J. ‘Knowledge and Conviction’, Synthese, 187, 2 (2012), 377–92. Atwell, J. E. Ends and Principles in Kant’s Moral Thought, Nijhoff Publishers (1986). Audi, R. ‘Self-Deception, Action, and Will’, Erkenntnis, 18, 2, (1975), 133–58. Audi, R. ‘Self-Deception and Practical Reasoning’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 19, 2, (1989), 247–66. Augustine. Treaties on Various Subjects, ed. R. J. Deferrari, Catholic University of America Press (1952). Auxter, T. Kant’s Moral Teleology, Mercer University Press (1982). Ayers, M. Locke, Routledge (1996). Bach, K. ‘An Analysis of Self-Deception’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 41, 3, (1981), 351–70. Bagnoli, C. ‘Self-deception: a Constructivist Account’, HumanaMente 20, (2012), 93–116. Banham, G. ‘Kantian Respect’, Kant Studies Online, (2008), 1–14. Barnes, J. ‘Belief is up to Us’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106, (2006), 189–206.
    [Show full text]
  • Jury Trials in Japan Robert M
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 3-16-2005 Jury Trials in Japan Robert M. Bloom Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Part of the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Robert M. Bloom. "Jury Trials in Japan." Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 28, no.1 (2005): 35-68. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JURY TRIALS IN JAPAN 1 Robert M. Bloom INTRODUCTION In the late 1980s, I hosted a group of Japanese lawyers and judges from the Osaka Bar Association Committee for Judicial System Reform, 2 a group interested in observing the jury system in the United Sta tes. I took them to the Massachusetts Superior Court 3 where they could observe jury trials. From the discussions I had with the visitors, it was clear that they were keenly interested in the concept of citizen participation in the legal process . Japan’s c ommitment to democracy has flourished for 60 years, and is enshrined in the preamble of its post -World War II 4 Constitution: “Government is a sacred trust of the people, the authority for which is derived from the people, the powers of which are exercised by the representatives of the people, and the benefits of which are enjoyed by * Professor of Law Boston College Law School 1 Au thor wishes to thank Franklin Schwarzer, Arielle Simon and Ben Steffans, students in the class of 2006 at Boston College Law School.
    [Show full text]