DOCSLIB.ORG

Chronological Table for the Development of Atomic and Molecular Physics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chronological Table for the Development of Atomic and Molecular Physics Chronological Table for the Development of Atomic and Molecular Physics ≈ 440 Empedocles assumes, that the whole world is constant proportions”: Each chemical element BC composed of 4 basic elements: Fire, Water, Air consists of equal atoms which form with sim- and Soil. ple number ratios molecules as building blocks ≈ 400 Leucippos and his disciple Democritus claim, of chemical compounds. BC that the world consists of small indivisible 1811 Amedeo Avogadro derives from the laws particles, called atoms, which are stable and of Gay-Lussac (Δp/p = ΔT/T ) and Boyle- nondestructable. Marriot (p · V = constant for T = constant) ≈ 360 Plato attributes four regular regular geometric the conclusion that all gases contain under BC structures composed of triangles and squares equal conditions (pressure and temperature) (Platonic bodies) to the four elements and the same number of particles per volume. postulates that these structures and their inter- 1820 John Herapath publishes his conception of a change represent the real building blocks of the Kinetic theory of gases. world. 1857 Rudolf J.E. Clausius develops further the ki- ≈ 340 Aristotle contradicts the atomic theory and as- netic gas theory, founded by J. Herapath and BC sumes that the mater is continuous and does D. Bernoulli. not consist of particles. 1860 Gustav Robert Kirchhoff and Robert Bunsen 300 Epicurus revives the atomic model and as- create the foundations of spectral analysis of BC sumes that the atoms have weight and spatial the chemical elements. extension. 1865 Joseph Lohschmidt calculates the absolute 200 BC no real progress in atomic physics. number of molecules contained in 1 cm3 of –1600 AC a gas under normal conditions (p = 1atm, 1661 Robert Boyle fights in his book: “The Sceptical T = 300 K). Chemist” for the atomic model, which states, 1869 Lothar Meyer and D.I. Mendelejew estab- that all matter consists of atoms which differ lish (independent of each other) the Periodic in size and form for the different elements. System of the Elements. He defines the terms “chemical element” and 1869 Johann Wilhelm Hittorf discovers the cathode “chemical compound”. rays in gas discharges. 1738 Daniel Bernoulli assumes that heat can be ex- 1870 James Clark Maxwell gives the mathematical plained as the movement of small particles. He foundations to the kinetic gas theory. He de- may be regarded as the father of the kinetic gas fines the atoms as “absolute and unchangeable theory. building blocks of matter”. 1808 John Dalton supports in his book “ANew 1884 Ludwig Boltzmann develops from statistical System of Chemical Philosophy” the atomic grounds the distribution function for the en- hypothesis by describing his experiments on ergy of a system of free atoms in a constant careful weighing the masses of reactants and volume. Together with the Austrian physicist reaction products of a chemical reaction. The Josef Stefan he derives the Stefan–Boltzmann results of these experiments lead to the “law of radiation law. W. Demtröder, Atoms, Molecules and Photons, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Physics, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-10298-1, c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010 520 Chronological Table 1885 Johann Jakob Balmer finds the Balmer- shows that both the characteristic and the con- formula for the spectral lines of the hydrogen tinuum radiation could be polarized. atom. 1913 Niels Bohr (Nobelprize 1922) develops his 1886 Eugen Goldstein discovers the “Kanal- new atomic model, based on the Rutherford Strahlen” (anode rays). model and the quantum hypothesis of Planck. 1886 Heinrich Hertz detects experimentally the 1913 Henry Moseley finds periodic regularities for electromagnetic waves predicted by Maxwell’s the absorption frequencies of X-rays by differ- theory and discovers 1887 the photo-electric ent atoms and is able to determine the nuclear effect and performs first experiments on the charge number Z of the atoms from his mea- absorption of cathode rays. surements of absorption edges. 1888 Phillip Lenard further investigates the absorp- James Franck and Gustav L. Hertz investigate tion of the cathode rays. the inelastic collisions of electrons with atoms 1895 Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discovers, while (Franck–Hertz experiment). Nobel prize 1925. working on the properties of cathode rays 1919 Arnold Sommerfeld comprises all known facts a new kind of radiation which he called X-rays and models of atoms in his famous textbook: (first Nobel Prize in Physics 1901). “Atombau und Spektrallinien” and refines the 1896 Henry Becquerel first discovers radioactivity atomic model of Bohr. (Nobel prize 1903). 1921 Otto Stern and Walter Gerlach investigate the 1898 Marie Curie separates different radioactive el- deflection of atoms in an inhomogeneous mag- ements (Polonium and Radium) from minerals netic field and demonstrate the quantization of (Nobel prizes for Physics 1903 and Chemistry the component of the atomic angular momen- 1911). tum. 1900 Max Planck presents his new theory of black 1923 Arthur Holly Compton (Nobel prize 1927) ex- body radiation, introducing the energy quanta plains the inelastic scattering of X-rays by h · ν of the radiation field. This is nowadays electrons (Compton effect) using the model of regarded as the birth year of quantum physics light quanta. (Nobel prize 1918). 1924 Louis de Broglie (Nobel prize 1929) introduces 1905 Albert Einstein develops his theory of Brow- the concept of matter waves. nian motion. He explains the photoelectric 1925 S.A. Goudsmit and G.E. Uhlenbeck explain the effect using Planck’s light quantum hypothesis anomalous Zeeman effect by introducing the (Nobel prize 1921). electron spin, postulated theoretical already 1906 Charles Glover Barkla discovers the charac- 1924 by W. Pauli. teristic X-rays of the elements (Nobel prize 1925 W. Pauli (Nobel prize 1945) introduces the ex- 1917). clusion principle (Pauli-principle) which states 1909 Robert Millikan measures the elementary that every existing atomic state occupied by charge e with his oil-droplet experiment more than on electron must be described by (Nobel prize 1923). a wavefunction (product of spatial part and 1911 Ernest Rutherford and his coworkers investi- spin function) which is antisymmetric with gate the scattering of α-particles by gold nuclei respect to the exchange of two electrons. and postulates his atomic model. This can be 1925 Erwin Schrödinger (Nobel prize 1933) ex- regarded as the foundation of modern atomic tends the ideas of deBroglie about matter physics (Nobel prize for Chemistry 1908). waves to a general wave-mechanics which is 1912 Max von Laue (Nobelprize 1914) and his based on a special wave equation, called the coworkers demonstrate, that X-rays repre- Schrödinger equation. sent electro-magnetic waves by observing the 1927 Wolfgang Pauli gives a mathematical descrip- diffraction of X-rays by crystals. tion of the electron spin in form of quadrat- Shortly later William Henry Bragg (Nobelprize ic “spin-matrices” with two rows and two 1915) confirms this result and furthermore columns. Werner Heisenberg (Nobel prize Chronological Table 521 1932) develops together with Max Born 1954 N.G. Basow, A.M. Prochorov and Ch. Townes (Nobel prize 1954) and Pascual Jordan the (Nobel prize 1964) develop the theoretical mathematical concept of quantum mechan- foundations of the maser principle, based on ics, represented by matrices. He derives the Kastler‘s idea of optical pumping. First exper- uncertainty relations. imental verification of the NH3-maser by J.P. 1928 J.C. Davisson (Nobel prize 1937) and L.H. Gordon, H.J. Zeiger and Ch. Townes. Germer prove experimentally the wave na- 1957 Explanation of supra-conductivity by John ture of electrons by observing the diffraction Bardeen, Leon Cooper and J. Robert Schrieffer pattern of electrons passing through thin crys- (BCS theory) Nobel prize 1972. talline foils. 1958 Rudolf Mößbauer: Recoil-free emission and Paul Dirac (Nobel prize 1933) develops a rel- absorption of γ -quants by atomic nuclei ativistic theory of Quantum Mechanics. (Mößbauer effect) (Nobel prize 1972). Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman (Nobel prize 1959 Arthur Schawlow (Nobel prize 1995) and 1930) discovers the inelastic scattering of light Charles Townes give detailed description for by molecules (Raman-effect). the extension of the maser principle to the 1932 E. Ruska (Nobel prize 1986) constructs the optical range. first electron microscope. 1960 First experimental realization of an optical 1936 I. Rabi (Nobel prize 1944) demonstrates a new maser (ruby laser) by Th. Maiman. techniques of radiofrequency spectroscopy in 1961 The first He-Ne-laser is constructed by W.R. molecular beams for the precise measurement Bennet and A. Javan, based on detailed inves- of magnet moments. tigations of atomic collision processes in gas 1944 G.Th. Seaborg (Nobelprize for Chemistry discharges. 1951) identifies the first tran-uranium ele- 1966 The dyelaser is developed indepently by F. P. ments. Schäfer and P.A. Sorokin. 1947 Polykarp Kusch (Nobel prize 1955): Mea- 1971 G. Herzberg receives the Nobel prize in surement of the magnetic moment of the Chemistry for his centennial work on molec- electron. ular spectroscopy. Willis Lamb (Nobel prize 1955): Measurement 1980 First proposals for optical cooling of atoms by of the energy difference (Lamb-shift) between photon recoil by Th.W. Hänsch, A. Schawlow the 2S1/2 and 2P1/2 levels in the hydrogen and V. Letokhov. atom. 1982 Development of tunnel microscopy by G. 1947 John Bardeen develops together with W.H. Binning and H. Rohrer, where single atoms Brattain and W. Shockley the transistor (Nobel on surfaces can be observed (Nobel prize prize 1956). 1986). 1948 Felix Bloch and Edward Mills Purcell (Nobel 1986 Discovery of high temperature supra conduc- prize 1952) demonstrate the nuclear magnetic tivity by J. Bednarz and K.A. Müller (Nobel resonance technique NMR. prize 1987). 1948 J. Schwinger, R.P. Feynman and S. Tomonaga 1988 Nobel prize to H. Michel, J. Deisenhofer and (Nobel prize 1965) Theoretical formulation R. Huber for the elucidation of the primary of quantum field theory (quantum Electro- process in the photosynthesis of green plants dynamics).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Charles Hard Townes (1915–2015)
    ARTICLE-IN-A-BOX Charles Hard Townes (1915–2015) C H Townes shared the Nobel Prize in 1964 for the concept of the laser and the earlier realization of the concept at microwave frequencies, called the maser. He passed away in January of this year, six months short of his hundredth birthday. A cursory look at the archives shows a paper as late as 2011 – ‘The Dust Distribution Immediately Surrounding V Hydrae’, a contribution to infrared astronomy. To get a feel for the range in time and field, his 1936 masters thesis was based on repairing a non-functional van de Graaf accelerator at Duke University in 1936! For his PhD at the California Institute of Technology, he measured the spin of the nucleus of carbon-13 using isotope separation and high resolution spectroscopy. Smythe, his thesis supervisor was writing a comprehensive text on electromagnetism, and Townes solved every problem in it – it must have stood him in good stead in what followed. In 1939, even a star student like him did not get an academic job. The industrial job he took set him on his lifetime course. This was at the legendary Bell Telephone Laboratories, the research wing of AT&T, the company which set up and ran the first – and then the best – telephone system in the world. He was initially given a lot of freedom to work with different research groups. During the Second World War, he worked in a group developing a radar based system for guiding bombs. But his goal was always physics research. After the War, Bell Labs, somewhat reluctantly, let him pursue microwave spectroscopy, on the basis of a technical report he wrote suggesting that molecules might serve as circuit elements at high frequencies which were important for communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman
    Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well­ more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt­ it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Boltzmann Was Born in Vienna, Austria. He Received His Early Education from a Private Tutor at Home
    Ludwig Boltzmann (1844-1906) Ludwig Boltzmann was born in Vienna, Austria. He received his early education from a private tutor at home. In 1863 he entered the University of Vienna, and was awarded his doctorate in 1866. His thesis was on the kinetic theory of gases under the supervision of Josef Stefan. Boltzmann moved to the University of Graz in 1869 where he was appointed chair of the department of theoretical physics. He would move six more times, occupying chairs in mathematics and experimental physics. Boltzmann was one of the most highly regarded scientists, and universities wishing to increase their prestige would lure him to their institutions with high salaries and prestigious posts. Boltzmann himself was subject to mood swings and he joked that this was due to his being born on the night between Shrove Tuesday and Ash Wednesday (or between Carnival and Lent). Traveling and relocating would temporarily provide relief from his depression. He married Henriette von Aigentler in 1876. They had three daughters and two sons. Boltzmann is best known for pioneering the field of statistical mechanics. This work was done independently of J. Willard Gibbs (who never moved from his home in Connecticut). Together their theories connected the seemingly wide gap between the macroscopic properties and behavior of substances with the microscopic properties and behavior of atoms and molecules. Interestingly, the history of statistical mechanics begins with a mathematical prize at Cambridge in 1855 on the subject of evaluating the motions of Saturn’s rings. (Laplace had developed a mechanical theory of the rings concluding that their stability was due to irregularities in mass distribution.) The prize was won by James Clerk Maxwell who then went on to develop the theory that, without knowing the individual motions of particles (or molecules), it was possible to use their statistical behavior to calculate properties of a gas such as viscosity, collision rate, diffusion rate and the ability to conduct heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Point in the Development of Quantum Mechanics and the Early Years of the Mossbauer Effect*
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory FERMILAB-Conf-76/87-THY October 1976 A TURNING POINT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTUM MECHANICS AND THE EARLY YEARS OF THE MOSSBAUER EFFECT* Harry J. Lipkin' Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60^39 Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory"; Batavia, Illinois 60S10 It is interesting to hear about the exciting early days recalled by Professors Wigner and Wick. I learned quantum theory at a later period, which might be called a turning point in its development, when the general attitude toward quantum mechanics and the study of physics was very different from what it is today. As an undergraduate student in electrical engineering in 19^0 in the United States I found a certain disagreement between the faculty and the students about the "relevance'- of the curriculum. Students thought a k-year course in electrical engineering should include more electronics than a one-semester 3-hour course. But the establishment emphasized the study of power machinery and power transmission because 95'/° of their graduates would eventually get jobs in power. Electronics, they said, was fun for students who were radio hams but useless on the job market. Students at that time did not have today's attitudes and did not stage massive demonstrations and protests against the curriculum. Instead a few of us who wished to learn more interesting things satisfied all the requirements of the engineering school and spent as much extra time as possible listening to fascinating courses in the physics building. There we had the opportunity to listen to two recently-arrived Europeans, Bruno Rossi and Hans Bethe.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Spectroscopy to Resolve Hyperfine Structure of Rubidium
    Laser spectroscopy to resolve hyperfine structure of rubidium Hannah Saddler, Adam Egbert, and Will Weigand (Dated: 12 November 2015) This experiment had two main goals: to create an absorption spectrum for rubidium using the technique of absorption spectroscopy and to resolve the hyperfine structures for the two rubidium isotopes using saturation absorption spectroscopy. The absorption spectrum was used to determine the frequency difference between the ground state and first excited state for both isotopes. The calculated frequency difference was 6950 MHz ± 90 MHz for rubidium 87 and 3060 MHz ± 60 MHz for rubidium 85. Both values agree with the literature values. The hyperfine structure for rubidium 87 was able to be resolved using this experimental setup. The energy differences were determined to be 260 MHz ± 10 MHz and 150 MHz ± 10 Mhz MHz. The hyperfine structure for rubidium 85 was unable to be resolved using this experimental setup. Additionally the theory of doppler broadening was used to make measurements of the full width half maximum. These values were used to calculate a temperature of 310K ± 40 K which makes sense because the experiments were performed at room temperature. I. INTRODUCTION in the theory section and how they were manipulated and used to derive the results from the recorded data. Addi- tionally there is an explanation of experimental error and The era of modern spectroscopy began with the in- uncertainty associated the results. Section V is a conclu- vention of the laser. The word laser was originally an sion that ties the results of the experiment we performed acronym that stood for light amplification by stimulated to the usefulness of the technique of laser spectroscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Spectroscopy Experiments
    Hyperfine Spectrum of Rubidium: laser spectroscopy experiments Physics 480W (Dated: Sp19 Paper #4) I. OBJECTIVES FOR THESE EXPERIMENTS We wish to use the technique of absorption spec- troscopy to probe and detect the energy level structure of atomic Rubidium, Rb I, whose ground state is split by a tiny amount on account of nuclear magnetism. In effect, the spectroscopy we do today tells us about nuclear prop- erties and so combines atomic and nuclear physics. The main result of this experiment, the 4th of the semester, is to 1. measure the hyperfine splitting for each isotope, and compare with accepted values, with the fol- lowing details in mind: (a) what is the hyperfine splitting of the ground 2 state, S1=2 term? Do we need saturation- absorption techniques for this? (b) what are the hyperfine splittings of the ex- 2 cited state, P3=2 term, that can be reached with a nominal wavelength of 780nm from the ground state? Here we need saturation- absorption techniques to perform sub-Doppler FIG. 1. Note the four 'blobs'. Why are there four? Which spectroscopy, certainly. Help the reader un- 85 are associated with Rb37, and so on. If all goes swimm- derstand what is entailed in the technique, ingly, we'll get an absorption spectrum that looks much line both experimentally and theoretically. You the figure below the setup. The etalon data will be needed to will need to explain what `saturation' means. make the abscissa something proportional to frequency. The The saturation intensity is an important fig- accepted value of the gap between the 2 outermost dips is ure of merit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of the Photon—Revisited
    The concept of the photon—revisited Ashok Muthukrishnan,1 Marlan O. Scully,1,2 and M. Suhail Zubairy1,3 1Institute for Quantum Studies and Department of Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 2Departments of Chemistry and Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 3Department of Electronics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan The photon concept is one of the most debated issues in the history of physical science. Some thirty years ago, we published an article in Physics Today entitled “The Concept of the Photon,”1 in which we described the “photon” as a classical electromagnetic field plus the fluctuations associated with the vacuum. However, subsequent developments required us to envision the photon as an intrinsically quantum mechanical entity, whose basic physics is much deeper than can be explained by the simple ‘classical wave plus vacuum fluctuations’ picture. These ideas and the extensions of our conceptual understanding are discussed in detail in our recent quantum optics book.2 In this article we revisit the photon concept based on examples from these sources and more. © 2003 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: 270.0270, 260.0260. he “photon” is a quintessentially twentieth-century con- on are vacuum fluctuations (as in our earlier article1), and as- Tcept, intimately tied to the birth of quantum mechanics pects of many-particle correlations (as in our recent book2). and quantum electrodynamics. However, the root of the idea Examples of the first are spontaneous emission, Lamb shift, may be said to be much older, as old as the historical debate and the scattering of atoms off the vacuum field at the en- on the nature of light itself – whether it is a wave or a particle trance to a micromaser.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004
    Advanced information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004 Information Department, P.O. Box 50005, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 673 95 00, Fax: +46 8 15 56 70, E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.kva.se Asymptotic Freedom and Quantum ChromoDynamics: the Key to the Understanding of the Strong Nuclear Forces The Basic Forces in Nature We know of two fundamental forces on the macroscopic scale that we experience in daily life: the gravitational force that binds our solar system together and keeps us on earth, and the electromagnetic force between electrically charged objects. Both are mediated over a distance and the force is proportional to the inverse square of the distance between the objects. Isaac Newton described the gravitational force in his Principia in 1687, and in 1915 Albert Einstein (Nobel Prize, 1921 for the photoelectric effect) presented his General Theory of Relativity for the gravitational force, which generalized Newton’s theory. Einstein’s theory is perhaps the greatest achievement in the history of science and the most celebrated one. The laws for the electromagnetic force were formulated by James Clark Maxwell in 1873, also a great leap forward in human endeavour. With the advent of quantum mechanics in the first decades of the 20th century it was realized that the electromagnetic field, including light, is quantized and can be seen as a stream of particles, photons. In this picture, the electromagnetic force can be thought of as a bombardment of photons, as when one object is thrown to another to transmit a force.
    [Show full text]
  • Light and the Electromagnetic Spectrum
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © JonesLight & Bartlett and Learning, LLCthe © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOTElectromagnetic FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION4 Spectrum © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALEJ AMESOR DISTRIBUTIONCLERK MAXWELL WAS BORN IN EDINBURGH, SCOTLANDNOT FOR IN 1831. SALE His ORgenius DISTRIBUTION was ap- The Milky Way seen parent early in his life, for at the age of 14 years, he published a paper in the at 10 wavelengths of Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. One of his first major achievements the electromagnetic was the explanation for the rings of Saturn, in which he showed that they con- spectrum. Courtesy of Astrophysics Data Facility sist of small particles in orbit around the planet. In the 1860s, Maxwell began at the NASA Goddard a study of electricity© Jones and & magnetismBartlett Learning, and discovered LLC that it should be possible© Jones Space & Bartlett Flight Center. Learning, LLC to produce aNOT wave FORthat combines SALE OR electrical DISTRIBUTION and magnetic effects, a so-calledNOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION electromagnetic wave.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Quant-Ph/0510180V1 24 Oct 2005 Einstein and the Quantum
    TIFR/TH/05-39 27.9.2005 Einstein and the Quantum Virendra Singh Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400 005, India Abstract We review here the main contributions of Einstein to the quantum theory. To put them in perspective we first give an account of Physics as it was before him. It is followed by a brief account of the problem of black body radiation which provided the context for Planck to introduce the idea of quantum. Einstein’s revolutionary paper of 1905 on light-quantum hypothesis is then described as well as an application of this idea to the photoelectric effect. We next take up a discussion of Einstein’s other contributions to old quantum theory. These include (i) his theory of specific heat of solids, which was the first application of quantum theory to matter, (ii) his discovery of wave-particle duality for light and (iii) Einstein’s A and B coefficients relating to the probabilities of emission and absorption of light by atomic systems and his discovery of radiation stimulated emission of light which provides the basis for laser action. We then describe Einstein’s contribution to quantum statistics viz Bose- Einstein Statistics and his prediction of Bose-Einstein condensation of a boson gas. Einstein played a pivotal role in the discovery of Quantum mechanics and this is briefly mentioned. After 1925 Einstein’s contributed mainly to the foundations of Quantum Mechanics. We arXiv:quant-ph/0510180v1 24 Oct 2005 choose to discuss here (i) his Ensemble (or Statistical) Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and (ii) the discovery of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlations and the EPR theorem on the conflict between Einstein-Locality and the completeness of the formalism of Quantum Mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Historical Background
    1 Historical Background 1.1 Introduction The purpose of this chapter is to explain how and why Planck introduced his famous quantum hypothesis and the constant h. I have added a few contributions from Einstein that are relevant for this book. We shall see that results based on the wave nature of light alternate with results based on its corpuscular nature. Eventually, it will be Planck’s constant that will bridge the gap between these two viewpoints and lead to the foundation of quantum physics, unifying the two aspects of light, and much more. But first a warning! This chapter is difficult to read because we are no longer used to thinking and reasoning along the same lines as our prede- cessors. Still, I think that it is of interest to follow the chain that started with Kirchhoff’s second law and ended with Planck’s hypothesis of quan- tized emission of radiation, using the tools available in their time. It gives a flavor of what physics was at that time. It also shows how much we have progressed since then. 1.2 Kirchhoff (1859) 1.2.1 The Birth of Spectroscopy The physicist Kirchhoff1 was collaborating with the chemist Bunsen2 (Fig. 1.1). Out of this collaboration emerged the science of spectroscopy. An early discovery was the phenomenon of spectral line inversion. The experiment is displayed schematically in Fig. 1.2. 1Gustav Robert Kirchhoff (b. Königsberg, 1824; d. Berlin, 1887). 2Robert Wilhelm Bunsen (b. Göttingen, 1811; d. Heidelberg, 1899). Nonlinear Optics: An Analytic Approach. Paul Mandel Copyright © 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Ht2009-88060
    Proceedings HT 2009 2009 ASME Summer Heat Transfer Conference July 19-23, 2009, San Francisco, California USA HT2009-88060 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE T4 RADIATION LAW John Crepeau University of Idaho Department of Mechanical Engineering PO Box 440902 Moscow, ID 83844-0902 USA ABSTRACT he combined his Displacement Law with the T4 law to give a Since the 1700s, natural philosophers understood that heat blackbody spectrum which was accurate over some ranges, but exchange between two bodies was not precisely linearly diverged in the far infrared. dependent on the temperature difference, and that at high Max Planck, at the University of Berlin, built on temperatures the discrepancy became greater. Over the years, Wien’s model but, as Planck himself stated, “the energy of many models were developed with varying degrees of success. radiation is distributed in a completely irregular manner among The lack of success was due to the difficulty obtaining accurate the individual partial vibrations...” This “irregular” or discrete experimental data, and a lack of knowledge of the fundamental treatment of the radiation became the basis for quantum mechanisms underlying radiation heat exchange. Josef Stefan, mechanics and a revolution in physics. of the University of Vienna, compiled data taken by a number This paper will present brief biographies of the four of researchers who used various methods to obtain their data, pillars of the T4 radiation law, Stefan, Boltzmann, Wien and and in 1879 proposed a unique relation to model the Planck, and outline the methodologies used to obtain their dependence of radiative heat exchange on the temperature: the results.
    [Show full text]