DOCSLIB.ORG

The “Boggart” of Particle Physics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The “Boggart” of Particle Physics The “Boggart” of Particle Physics Dept of Physics Pradipta Ghosh 26th March, 2021 March 26, 2021 1 / 19 “Hogwarts” of the Particle Physics The Standard Model The Inmates and Laws Elementary Particles Basic Interactions and mediators Not included in the Standard Model Image acknowledgement: Harry Potter Wiki, Wikipedia March 26, 2021 2 / 19 Hogwarts of the Particle Physics: The inmates Elementary Particles and Mediators DOD: 4 July 2012 The missing piece 1964-2012 1 eV/c2 = 1.783×10−36 kg C = 1 in natural unit system Neutrinos are Mass-less in the Standard Model Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia March 26, 2021 3 / 19 Theory: Glashow, 1961, Weinberg, 1967, Salam, 1968 1979 Sheldon Steven Abdus Glashow Weinberg Salam “Hogwarts” of Particle Physics: Founders Theory: Greenberg, 1964, Han, Nambu, 1964, Bardeen, Fritzsch, Gell-Mann, 1973 C. R. Tom Gerald Theory: Hagen Guralnik 1973 Kibble 2004 David H. D. F. Wilczek Gross Politzer François Theory: Nambu, Peter Englert Jona-Lasinio 1961 Higgs 1999 Robert Gerard Martinus 2013 Brout 2008 't Hooft J. G. Veltman Theory: Brout, Englert, Higgs, Guralnik, Hagen, Kibble, 1964 Yoichiro Nambu Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia March 26, 2021 4 / 19 Muon S. Neddermeyer Electron (1936) (1897) Theory: Pauli, 1930 Tau e-Neutrino (1975) (1956) 1995 Martin Clyde C. D. Anderson Cowan 1995 1906 Lewis Perl t-Neutrino Frederick m-Neutrino (1962) (2000) Carlo Rubbia Reines J. J. Thomson Theory: 1940 DONUT Coll. Theory: 1970 Simon van der Meer 1984 + - 1988 W ,W ,Z UA1, UA2 (1983) CERN Leon M. Melvin Jack The Seekers Theory: Glashow, Weinberg, Salam, 1968 Lederman Schwartz Steinberger Theory: 1973 Gluons Light quarks DORIS (1978) (up,down,strange) PETRA (1979) SLAC (1968) DESY 2008 Theory: Gell-Mann, 1962 T. Maskawa M. Kobayashi 1976 Bottom quark Top quark FermiLAB CDF & D0 Burton Samuel Ting (1977) (1995) 1969 Richter 2013 Murray George Charm quark Higgs boson Gell-Mann Zweig Peter SLAC,BNL (1974) ATLAS, CMS (2012) François Theory: 1964 Higgs Englert Theory: Glashow, LHC-CERN Iliopoulos,Maiani, 1970 Theory: Brout, Englert, Higgs, Guralnik, Hagen, Kibble, 1964 Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia March 26, 2021 5 / 19 Life after Higgs discovery In reality: I must not tell lies Unanswered questions: 1. Massive Neutrinos? 2. Why Higgs mass is only 125 GeV? 3. What is dark matter? 4. Why so much matter? 5….. 6….. We NEED to move beyond the Standard Model Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia March 26, 2021 6 / 19 Massive Neutrinos !!!!! Neutrinos are Massless within the SM Neutrinos oscillate in nature: Observed Theory: Pontecorvo, 1957, 1967, Arthur Takaaki Maki, Nakagawa, Sakata, 1962 McDonald Kajita Oscillation impossible 2015 WITHOUT Neutrino mass Not within the SM Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia March 26, 2021 7 / 19 Neutrinos oscillate in nature: Observed Neutrinos are Massless within the SM X, Y are nuclei. Detected only 1/3 of the expected event: Solar neutrino problem Not observed: Atmospheric neutrino problem Why we are losing certain types? Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Johan Jarnestad March 26, 2021 8 / 19 The “Boggart”: Neutrinos A Boggart is a shapeshifter (Harry Potter wiki) For Particle Physics: Boggart (shape): Neutrinos (Flavours) Poor Wizards: The Physicists Image acknowledgement: Harry Potter Wiki March 26, 2021 9 / 19 They are everywhere! Trillions (1012) of neutrinos pass through Your Only 1 interacts on body / second ! average out of 1022 !!! It is indeed a Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Andre de Gouvea March 26, 2021 10 / 19 Why we are losing certain types? Are they changing their types in motion? How? Basic idea with a silly example: Consider vectors in 2-dimension Linear Superposition to construct type “a” and “b” vectors→ Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Johan Jarnestad March 26, 2021 11 / 19 Why we are losing certain types? Another trivial but rather realistic example: Consider a two-level quantum mechanical system: Natural Unit System → Linear Superposition to construct type “a” and “b” wave functions → After a time span of “t”, we can write → Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Johan Jarnestad March 26, 2021 12 / 19 If we start with “a”, can we get “b” after some time? Yes: The corresponding quantity is Vanishes for massless neutrinos We have used Euler's formula → We have used Orthonormality conditions → Remember the vector dot products: Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Johan Jarnestad March 26, 2021 13 / 19 How non-zero is connected with neutrino mass? Neutrinos have tiny masses: They are “almost” massless and thus, travel with great speed ~ c Neglecting mass contribution to the energy: Which gives → Lesson 1: Non-zero masses are needed for neutrino oscillations Lesson 2: Neutrino oscillations can probe squared mass differences, but not the mass scale !!!!! Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Johan Jarnestad March 26, 2021 14 / 19 The reality: Three flavours oscillations For three flavours: squared mass differences The “real” picture Entries of the“U” matrix varies a lot !!!!! Flavour states Massive states Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Johan Jarnestad March 26, 2021 15 / 19 The “U” matrix: in-homogeneous mixing We can probe squared mass differences What about orderings? Questions to answer: (food for thought) 1. Why the mixings are so in-homogeneous? 2. How to extend the Standard Model to generate neutrino masses? 3. How to assure tiny neutrino masses? 4. Can we treat neutrinos as dark matter? 5. Can a neutrino act as its anti-particle? . Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Johan Jarnestad March 26, 2021 16 / 19 Models for neutrino masses and mixings and many many more…….. Which one is the “chosen one”? Time will answer Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia March 26, 2021 17 / 19 What we Indians are doing…. Bodi West Hills Image acknowledgement: Wikipedia, Prof. Naba. K. Mondal March 26, 2021 18 / 19 March 26, 2021 19 / 19.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • People and Things
    People and things On 15 April, Haim Harari of the Weizmann Institute, Israel, was guest speaker at a symposium to mark 20 years of accelerator operation at the Paul Scherrer Institute, Maurice Jacob's roving camera caught Murray Villigen, Switzerland. Gell Mann in a London pub with the manu­ (Photo Armin Muller) script of his book 'The Quark and the Jaguar'. 20 years of PSI In April the Swiss Paul Scherrer Institute celebrated 20 years of accelerator operations. Originally built for particle research, these facilities now extend over a wide spectrum of applications, from molecular structure to cancer therapy. Each year over 400 visiting researchers make use of PSI particle beams. Meetings An international symposium on strangeness and quark matter will be held from 1-5 September in Crete, covering 1. strangeness and quark- gluon plasma, 2. strangeness con­ LAPP, Annecy, well known authority French Academy of Sciences densation, 3. strange astrophysics, 4. on non-Abelian gauge theories, and strangelets, 5. dedicated instrumen­ Michel Davier, long-time specialist in tation for strangeness and quark Among the new corresponding electron-positron collision physics matter. Information from the Secre­ members of the French Academy of and former Director of the Orsay tariat, University of Athens, Physics Sciences (Academie des Sciences Linear Accelerator Laboratory. Other Dept., Nuclear & Particle Physics de Paris) are Raymond Stora of new members are Alain Aspect, Division, Panepistimioupolis, Greece- 15771 Athens, tel. (30-1)7247502, 7243362, 7243143, fax (30- 1)7235089, email gvassils ©atlas, uoa.ariadne-t.gr At a special colloquium held at CERN on 20 April to mark Carlo Rubbia's 60th birthday and the tenth anniversary of his Nobel Prize award with Simon van der Meer, left to right - Canadian TRIUMF Laboratory Director and former UA1 co-spokesman Alan Astbury, LHC Project Director Lyn Evans, Carlo Rubbia, Director General Chris Llewellyn Smith, and former UA 1 co-spokesman John Dowel I.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter
    Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 Volume 5 • Number 1 worldscinet.com/appn Takaaki Kajita 2015 Physics Nobel Laureate published by Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanyang Technological University (IAS@NTU) and South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association (SEATPA) South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 • Volume 5 • Number 1 A publication of the IAS@NTU Singapore and SEATPA Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter publishes articles reporting frontier discoveries in EDITORIAL physics, research highlights, and news to facilitate interaction, collaboration and 3 cooperation among physicists in Asia Pacific physics community. PEOPLE Editor-in-Chief 4 “Observing the Distant Supernova” — Interview with Kok Khoo Phua Nobel Laureate Prof Brian Schmidt Associate Editor-in-Chief “Discovering the W and Z Bosons” — Interview with Swee Cheng Lim Nobel Laureate Prof Carlo Rubbia SEATPA Committee Christopher C Bernido Phil Chan Leong Chuan Kwek Choy Heng Lai Swee Cheng Lim Ren Bao Liu Hwee Boon Low Anh Ký Nguyên Choo Hiap Oh OPINION AND COMMENTARY Kok Khoo Phua 10 China’s Great Scientific Leap Forward: Completion of a Roh Suan Tung Preecha Yupapin planned ‘Great Collider’ would transform particle physics Hishamuddin Zainuddin Freddy Zen Editorial Team NEWS Sen Mu 12 CityU’s Institute for Advanced Study will Champion Bold New Han Sun Chi Xiong Research Initiatives Case made for 'Ninth Planet' Graphic Designers Chuan Ming Loo Erin Ong Cover Photo: "Takaaki Kajita 5171- 2015" by Bengt Nyman - Own work.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Detectors Lecture Notes
    Lecture Notes Heidelberg, Summer Term 2011 The Physics of Particle Detectors Hans-Christian Schultz-Coulon Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Introduction Historical Developments Historical Development γ-rays First 1896 Detection of α-, β- and γ-rays 1896 β-rays Image of Becquerel's photographic plate which has been An x-ray picture taken by Wilhelm Röntgen of Albert von fogged by exposure to radiation from a uranium salt. Kölliker's hand at a public lecture on 23 January 1896. Historical Development Rutherford's scattering experiment Microscope + Scintillating ZnS screen Schematic view of Rutherford experiment 1911 Rutherford's original experimental setup Historical Development Detection of cosmic rays [Hess 1912; Nobel prize 1936] ! "# Electrometer Cylinder from Wulf [2 cm diameter] Mirror Strings Microscope Natrium ! !""#$%&'()*+,-)./0)1&$23456/)78096$/'9::9098)1912 $%&!'()*+,-.%!/0&1.)%21331&10!,0%))0!%42%!56784210462!1(,!9624,10462,:177%&!(2;! '()*+,-.%2!<=%4*1;%2%)%:0&67%0%&!;1&>!Victor F. Hess before his 1912 balloon flight in Austria during which he discovered cosmic rays. ?40! @4)*%! ;%&! /0%)),-.&1(8%! A! )1,,%2! ,4-.!;4%!BC;%2!;%,!D)%:0&67%0%&,!(7!;4%! EC2F,1-.,%!;%,!/0&1.)%21331&10,!;&%.%2G!(7!%42%!*H&!;4%!A8)%,(2F!FH2,04F%!I6,40462! %42,0%))%2! J(! :K22%2>! L10&4(7! =4&;! M%&=%2;%0G! (7! ;4%! E(*0! 47! 922%&%2! ;%,! 9624,10462,M6)(7%2!M62!B%(-.04F:%40!*&%4!J(!.1)0%2>! $%&!422%&%G!:)%42%&%!<N)42;%&!;4%20!;%&!O8%&3&H*(2F!;%&!9,6)10462!;%,!P%&C0%,>!'4&;!%&! H8%&! ;4%! BC;%2! F%,%2:0G! ,6! M%&&42F%&0! ,4-.!;1,!1:04M%!9624,10462,M6)(7%2!1(*!;%2!
    [Show full text]
  • The 1984 Nobel Prize in Physics Goes to Carlo Rubbia and Simon Vm Der Meer: R
    arrent Comments” EUGENE GARFIELD INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION* 3501 MARKET ST,, PHILADELPHIA, PA !9104 The 1984 Nobel Prize in Physics Goes to Carlo Rubbia and Simon vm der Meer: R. Bruce Merrifield Is Awarded the Chemistry Prize I Number 46 November 18, 1985 Last week we reviewed the 1984 Nobel Rubbia, van der Meer, and the hun- laureates in medicine: immunologists dreds of scientists and technicians at Niels K. Jerne, Georges J.F. Kohler, and CERN were seeking the ultimate confir- C6sar Milstein. 1 In this week’s essay the mation of what is known as the electro- prizewinners in physics and chemistry weak theory. Thk theory states that two are discussed. of the fundamental forces—electromag- The 1984 physics prize was shared by netism and the weak force-are actually Carlo Rubbia, Harvard University and facets of the same phenomenon. The the European Center for Nuclear Re- 1979 Nobel Prize in physics was shared search (CERN), Geneva, Switzerland, by Sheldon Glashow and Steven Wein- and Simon van der Meer, also of CERN. berg, Harvard, and Abdus Salam, Impe- The Nobel committee honored “their rial College of London, for their contri- decisive contributions.. which led to the butions to the eiectroweak theory. I dk- discovery of the field particles W and Z, cussed their work in my examination of communicators of the weak interac- the 1979 Nobel Iaureates.s tion. ”z The 1984 Nobel Prize in chemis- The daunting task facing the scientists try was awarded to R. Bruce Mertileld, at CERN was to find evidence of the sub- Rockefeller University, New York, for atomic exchange particles that commu- his development of a “simple and in- nicate the weak force.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Nothing Is New Under the Sun ! Prof. Dr. Dr. Carlo Rubbia Scientific
    Nothing is new under the Sun ! Prof. Dr. Dr. Carlo Rubbia Scientific Director, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e.V. Potsdam, Germany -Accompanying document to Prof. Rubbia’s keynote address during the 3rd Dii Desert Energy Conference (Berlin, November 7-9 2012). The beginning of the practical use of solar power goes back some 23 centuries ago with Archimedes of Syracuse, (287 BC to 212 BC) in sunny Sicily. Mathematician, physicist, engineer, inventor and astronomer, he has been one of the leading scientists of the classical antiquity. The written work of Archimedes has not survived as well as that of Euclid, and seven of his treatises are known to have existed only through references made to them by other authors. Only few details are known. However, the relatively few copies of Archimedes' written work that survived through the Middle Ages were an influential source of ideas for scientists during the Renaissance. His contributions in mathematics have been immense: the initiator of the infinitesimals, anticipating the modern calculus of the ratio between the square of the radius and the area of a circle, the quadrature of a parabola as the solution of an infinite series, the centre of gravity of geometric figures and so on. The Fields Medal, the equivalent of the Nobel in mathematics carries his portrait along with a carving illustrating his proof on the sphere and the cylinder. The inscription is a quote attributed to him, which reads in Latin: "Transire suum pectus mundoque potiri" (Rise above oneself and grasp the world). Among his advances in physics are the foundations of hydrostatics, refraction and parabolic concentration of light, statics and an explanation of the principle of the lever, where he said “Give me a place to stand on, and I will move the Earth”.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Lectures™ 2001-2005
    World Scientific Connecting Great Minds 逾10 0 种 诺贝尔奖得主著作 及 诺贝尔奖相关图书 我们非常荣幸得以出版超过100种诺贝尔奖得主著作 以及诺贝尔奖相关图书。 我们自1980年代开始与诺贝尔奖得主合作出版高品质 畅销书。一些得主担任我们的编辑顾问、丛书编辑， 并于我们期刊发表综述文章与学术论文。 世界科技与帝国理工学院出版社还邀得其中多位作了公 开演讲。 Philip W Anderson Sir Derek H R Barton Aage Niels Bohr Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar Murray Gell-Mann Georges Charpak Nicolaas Bloembergen Baruch S Blumberg Hans A Bethe Aaron J Ciechanover Claude Steven Chu Cohen-Tannoudji Leon N Cooper Pierre-Gilles de Gennes Niels K Jerne Richard Feynman Kenichi Fukui Lawrence R Klein Herbert Kroemer Vitaly L Ginzburg David Gross H Gobind Khorana Rita Levi-Montalcini Harry M Markowitz Karl Alex Müller Sir Nevill F Mott Ben Roy Mottelson 诺贝尔奖相关图书 THE PERIODIC TABLE AND A MISSED NOBEL PRIZES THAT CHANGED MEDICINE NOBEL PRIZE edited by Gilbert Thompson (Imperial College London) by Ulf Lagerkvist & edited by Erling Norrby (The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences) This book brings together in one volume fifteen Nobel Prize- winning discoveries that have had the greatest impact upon medical science and the practice of medicine during the 20th “This is a fascinating account of how century and up to the present time. Its overall aim is to groundbreaking scientists think and enlighten, entertain and stimulate. work. This is the insider’s view of the process and demands made on the Contents: The Discovery of Insulin (Robert Tattersall) • The experts of the Nobel Foundation who Discovery of the Cure for Pernicious Anaemia, Vitamin B12 assess the originality and significance (A Victor Hoffbrand) • The Discovery of
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004
    Advanced information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004 Information Department, P.O. Box 50005, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 673 95 00, Fax: +46 8 15 56 70, E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.kva.se Asymptotic Freedom and Quantum ChromoDynamics: the Key to the Understanding of the Strong Nuclear Forces The Basic Forces in Nature We know of two fundamental forces on the macroscopic scale that we experience in daily life: the gravitational force that binds our solar system together and keeps us on earth, and the electromagnetic force between electrically charged objects. Both are mediated over a distance and the force is proportional to the inverse square of the distance between the objects. Isaac Newton described the gravitational force in his Principia in 1687, and in 1915 Albert Einstein (Nobel Prize, 1921 for the photoelectric effect) presented his General Theory of Relativity for the gravitational force, which generalized Newton’s theory. Einstein’s theory is perhaps the greatest achievement in the history of science and the most celebrated one. The laws for the electromagnetic force were formulated by James Clark Maxwell in 1873, also a great leap forward in human endeavour. With the advent of quantum mechanics in the first decades of the 20th century it was realized that the electromagnetic field, including light, is quantized and can be seen as a stream of particles, photons. In this picture, the electromagnetic force can be thought of as a bombardment of photons, as when one object is thrown to another to transmit a force.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfap Policy Brief » October 2019
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN POLICY NFAP POLICY BRIEF» OCTOBER 2019 IMMIGRANTS AND NOBEL PRIZES : 1901- 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Immigrants have been awarded 38%, or 36 of 95, of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics since 2000.1 In 2019, the U.S. winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics (James Peebles) and one of the two American winners of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry (M. Stanley Whittingham) were immigrants to the United States. This showing by immigrants in 2019 is consistent with recent history and illustrates the contributions of immigrants to America. In 2018, Gérard Mourou, an immigrant from France, won the Nobel Prize in Physics. In 2017, the sole American winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was an immigrant, Joachim Frank, a Columbia University professor born in Germany. Immigrant Rainer Weiss, who was born in Germany and came to the United States as a teenager, was awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics, sharing it with two other Americans, Kip S. Thorne and Barry C. Barish. In 2016, all 6 American winners of the Nobel Prize in economics and scientific fields were immigrants. Table 1 U.S. Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics: 2000-2019 Category Immigrant Native-Born Percentage of Immigrant Winners Physics 14 19 42% Chemistry 12 21 36% Medicine 10 19 35% TOTAL 36 59 38% Source: National Foundation for American Policy, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, George Mason University Institute for Immigration Research. Between 1901 and 2019, immigrants have been awarded 35%, or 105 of 302, of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Prize in Physics 2008
    I NFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC The Nobel Prize in Physics 2008 Why is there something instead of nothing? Why are there so many different elementary particles? This year’s Nobel Laureates in Physics have presented theoretical insights that give us a deeper understanding of what happens far inside the tiniest building blocks of matter. Unravelling the hidden symmetries of nature Nature’s laws of symmetry are at the heart of this subject: or rather, broken symmetries, both those that seem to have existed in our universe from the very beginning and those that have spontaneously lost their original symmetry somewhere along the road. In fact, we are all the children of broken symmetry. It must have occurred immediately after the Big Bang some 14 billion years ago when as much antimatter as matter was created. The meet- ing between the two is fatal for both; they annihilate each other and all that is left is radiation. Evidently, however, matter won against antimatter, otherwise we would not be here. But we are here, and just a tiny deviation from perfect symmetry seems to have been enough – one extra particle of matter for every ten billion particles of antimatter was enough to make our world sur- vive. This excess of matter was the seed of our whole universe, which fi lled with galaxies, stars and planets – and eventually life. But what lies behind this symmetry violation in the cosmos is still a major mystery and an active fi eld of research. An unexplained broken symmetry at the birth of the universe. In the Big Bang, if as much matter as antimatter was created, they should have annihilated each other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus
    ISSN (Online) 2393-8021 IARJSET ISSN (Print) 2394-1588 International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology Vol. 5, Issue 10, October 2018 The Links of Chain of Development of Physics from Past to the Present in a Chronological Order Starting from Thales of Miletus Dr.(Prof.) V.C.A NAIR* Educational Physicist, Research Guide for Physics at Shri J.J.T. University, Rajasthan-333001, India. *[email protected] Abstract: The Research Paper consists mainly of the birth dates of scientists and philosophers Before Christ (BC) and After Death (AD) starting from Thales of Miletus with a brief description of their work and contribution to the development of Physics. The author has taken up some 400 odd scientists and put them in a chronological order. Nobel laureates are considered separately in the same paper. Along with the names of researchers are included few of the scientific events of importance. The entire chain forms a cascade and a ready reference for the reader. The graph at the end shows the recession in the earlier centuries and its transition to renaissance after the 12th century to the present. Keywords: As the contents of the paper mainly consists of names of scientists, the key words are many and hence the same is not given I. INTRODUCTION As the material for the topic is not readily available, it is taken from various sources and the collection and compiling is a Herculean task running into some 20 pages. It is given in 3 parts, Part I, Part II and Part III. In Part I the years are given in Chronological order as per the year of birth of the scientist and accordingly the serial number.
    [Show full text]
  • Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (Historical Perspective)
    Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (Historical Perspective) 40th SLAC Summer Institute · 2012 History is not just a thing of the past! 2 Symmetry Indistinguishable before and after a transformation Unobservable quantity would vanish if symmetry held Disorder order = reduced symmetry 3 Symmetry Bilateral Translational, rotational, … Ornamental Crystals 4 Symmetry CsI Fullerene C60 ball and stick created from a PDB using Piotr Rotkiewicz's [http://www.pirx.com/iMol/ iMol]. {{gfdl}} Source: English Wikipedia, 5 Symmetry (continuous) 6 Symmetry matters. 7 8 Symmetries & conservation laws Spatial translation Momentum Time translation Energy Rotational invariance Angular momentum QM phase Charge 9 Symmetric laws need not imply symmetric outcomes. 10 symmetries of laws ⇏ symmetries of outcomes by Wilson Bentley, via NOAA Photo Library Photo via NOAA Wilson Bentley, by Studies among the Snow Crystals ... CrystalsStudies amongSnow the ... 11 Broken symmetry is interesting. 12 Two-dimensional Ising model of ferromagnet http://boudin.fnal.gov/applet/IsingPage.html 13 Continuum of degenerate vacua 14 Nambu–Goldstone bosons V Betsy Devine Yoichiro Nambu �� 2 Massless NG boson 1 Massive scalar boson NGBs as spin waves, phonons, pions, … Jeffrey Goldstone 15 Symmetries imply forces. I: scale symmetry to unify EM, gravity Hermann Weyl (1918, 1929) 16 NEW Complex phase in QM ORIGINAL Global: free particle Local: interactions 17 Maxwell’s equations; QED massless spin-1 photon coupled to conserved charge no impediment to electron mass (eL & eR have same charge) James Clerk Maxwell (1861/2) 18 19 QED Fermion masses allowed Gauge-boson masses forbidden Photon mass term 1 2 µ 2 mγ A Aµ violates gauge invariance: AµA (Aµ ∂µΛ) (A ∂ Λ) = AµA µ ⇥ − µ − µ ⇤ µ Massless photon predicted 22 observed: mγ 10− me 20 Symmetries imply forces.
    [Show full text]