DOCSLIB.ORG

Examples of Microaggressions 1 Theme Microaggression Examples

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Examples of Microaggressions 1 Theme Microaggression Examples Examples of Microaggressions Theme Microaggression Examples Message Race Assumptions of criminality A security guard following a Black You are a criminal. person, presuming that they are going to cause damage or steal. You are going to steal/you are poor, you do not belong. While walking through the halls of a College building, a security guard You are dangerous. approaches a black member of staff to ask if she/he is lost, even though she/he is in a group with other staff members. Objectification/tokenism (e.g. “What are you? You’re so You are a perpetual foreigner in when BAME people are objectified interesting looking!” your own country. or treated as tokens). “she is so exotic”. Your ethnic/racial identity makes you exotic. “how do you get your hair like that?!” You are outside of the norm. Assumptions of intellectual “You’re so articulate”. BAME people are generally not as inferiority (e.g. BAME people are intelligent as White people. assumed to be less intelligent or “you speak English so well”. capable than white people). Denigrating cultural To an East Asian person: “Why are Assimilate to dominant culture. values/communication styles (e.g. you so quiet? We want to know the notion that the values and what you think. Be more verbal.” Leave your cultural baggage communication styles of the “Speak up more.” outside. dominant/White culture are ideal/”normal”). There is no room for difference. 1 Examples of Microaggressions Asking a Black person: “Why do you have to be so loud/animated/aggressive? Just calm down.” Colour blindness (e.g. statements “When I look at you, I don’t see Denying the significance of BAME that indicate that a White person colour.” people’s racial/ethnic experience does not want to or need to and history. acknowledge race). “There is only one race, the human race.” “All lives matter!” Gender Sexual objectification (e.g. when a Commenting on the The most important thing about a woman is treated as a sexual appearance/attractiveness of a woman is the way that she looks. object). female colleague. Assumptions of traditional gender A person asks a woman her age and, Women should be married during roles (e.g. when an individual upon hearing she is 31, looks quickly child-bearing ages because that is assumes that a woman needs to at her ring finger. their primary purpose. uphold traditional gender roles). An advisor asks a female student if Women cannot have children and she is planning on having children be successful in their studies/career. while in postdoctoral training. Assertiveness in women is Labelling an assertive female undesirable and women should be committee chair/dean as a “b____,” submissive. while describing a male counterpart as a “forceful leader.” Assumptions of inferiority e.g. Female doctor mistaken for a nurse. Women occupy nurturing when a woman is assumed to be positions/They couldn’t possibly physically or intellectually “You look too young to work here”. occupy high status positions. incompetent, particularly in comparison to men). 2 Examples of Microaggressions LGBTQ+ Use of heterosexist or transphobic For instance, the use of the word Being gay is negative/all gay people terminology (e.g. when offensive “gay” casually when describing are weak. language is used towards or about someone as weak. LGBTQ+ people). Discomfort/disapproval of LGBTQ+ A person staring at a same-sex It is not normal to be in a same-sex experience (e.g. when LGBTQ+ couple holding hands. relationship. individuals are treated with disrespect or condemnation because of their sexual orientation or gender presentation). Assumption of sexual pathology and Assumption that an LGBTQ+ person LGBTQ+ people are oversexualised. abnormality (e.g.when LGBTQ+ will automatically be attracted to persons are presumed to be them. oversexualised or sexual deviants). Assumption of heterosexuality/cis Assuming that someone’s partner is LGBTQ+ people are very rare, not gender of the opposite sex to them. normal. LGBTQ+ people are all instantly identifiable. Assuming there are no LGBTQ+ people in the room e.g. saying ‘We never get any LGBTQ+ people coming to our meetings’. Assuming pronouns. Lack of thought around LGBTQ+ Arranging fieldwork, meetings in a I am not aware of LGBTQ+ issues issues country with strong anti - LGBTQ+ and people. laws, without acknowledging possible uncomfortable situation (or even risk?) for colleagues (e.g. asking if they are ok with it). 3 Examples of Microaggressions Religion Endorsing religious stereotypes Someone makes a joke about Stereotypes are true of all people of (e.g. when people make Muslim people being terrorists or a religion/religious group. presumptions about religious Jewish people being cheap. minority groups). Denigration of different religious Placing less/no value on non- Assimilate to dominant culture. groups (e.g. when someone judges Christian holidays or traditions. another religion as being inferior or Leave your cultural baggage substandard). “It’s ridiculous that they are fasting outside. during exam time”. There is no room for difference. Disability Assumptions of inferiority (e.g. Raising your voice or speaking A person with a disability is defined when a disabled person is slowly when addressing a blind as lesser in all aspects of physical assumed to be physically or student. and mental functioning. intellectually incompetent, particularly in comparison to those “The way you have overcome your without a disability). disability is so inspiring”. All Denial (e.g. a statement made “I’m not racist. I have several Black I could never be racist because I when bias is denied). friends.” have Black friends. “As a woman, I know what you go Your racial oppression is no through as a racial minority.” different than my gender oppression. I can’t be a racist. I’m To a Black person: “Are you sure like you. you were being followed in the store? I can’t believe it.” Denying the personal experience of individuals who experience bias. Myth of meritocracy (e.g. “I believe the most qualified person The playing field is even, so if statements which assert that should get the job. We need Women/BAME/Disabled/LGBTQ+ race, gender, disability, sexual excellence!” people cannot make it, the problem orientation, gender identity etc. is with them. 4 Examples of Microaggressions does not play a role in life “Men and women have equal successes). opportunities for achievement.” “Gender plays no part in who we hire.” “Everyone can succeed in this society, if they work hard enough.” Black people are given extra unfair “Positive action is racist.” benefits because of their race. Second-class citizen (e.g. when a Black Academic mistaken for a BAME people are servants to White target group member receives service worker. people. They couldn’t possibly differential treatment from the occupy high status positions. dominant group). Saying “You people…” You don’t belong. You are a lesser An Academic assigns a Black post- being. doctoral student to escort a visiting scientist of the same race even People should associate with others though there are other non-Black of their own race. scientists in this person’s specific area of research. A Head of Department sends an A female academic is good at her email to a work colleague describing job, despite her gender. another individual as a “good female scientist.” In class, a Lecturer tends to call on The contributions of female male students more frequently than students are less worthy than the female ones. contributions of male students. 5 Examples of Microaggressions Adapted from: https://academicaffairs.ucsc.edu/events/documents/Microaggressions_Examples_Arial_2014_11_12.pdf Sue, Derald Wing, Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender and Sexual Orientation, Wiley & Sons, 2010. Nadal, Kevin L., A Guide to Responding to Microaggressions, CUNY FORUM 2:1 (2014) 71-76 https://advancingjustice- la.org/sites/default/files/ELAMICRO%20A_Guide_to_Responding_to_Microaggressions.pdf 6 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Critical Race Theory, Race and Gender Microaggressions, and the Experience of Chicana and Chicano Scholars
    QUALITATIVE STUDIES IN EDUCATION, 1998, VOL. 11, NO. 1, 121±136 Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars D ANIEL G . SOLO; RZANO G raduate School of Education & Information Studies University of California, Los Angeles Using critical race theory as a framework, this article provides an examination of how racial and gender microaggressions aåect the career paths of Chicana and Chicano scholars. This paper reports on open-ended survey and interview data of a purposive sample of six Chicana and six Chicano Ford Foundation Predoctoral, D issertation, and Postdoctoral M inority Fellows. There are three objectives for this study : (a) to extend and apply a critical race theory to the ®eld of education, (b) to `` recognize,’’ `` document,’’ and analyze racial and gender microaggressions of Chicana and Chicano scholars, and (c) to `` hear ’’ the voice of `` discrimination’s victims ’’ by examining the eåect of race and gender microaggressions on the lives of Chicana and Chicano scholars. Three patterns of racial and gender microaggressions were found : (a) scholars who felt out of place in the academy because of their race and}or gender, (b) scholars who felt their teachers}professors had lower expectations for them, and (c) scholars’ accounts of subtle and not so subtle racial and gender incidents. The article ends with possible directions for continued critical race theory research with scholars of color. Introduction These [racial] assaults to black dignity and black hope are incessant and cumulative. Any single one may be gross. In fact, the major vehicle for racism in this country is oåenses done to blacks by whites in this sort of gratuitous never- ending way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Experiences with Microaggression and the Leadership Practices of Mid-Level Student Affairs Professionals
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXPERIENCES WITH MICROAGGRESSION AND THE LEADERSHIP PRACTICES OF MID-LEVEL STUDENT AFFAIRS PROFESSIONALS LaDonna R. Moore A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2016 Committee: Dafina-Lazarus Stewart, Advisor Judith Jackson May Graduate Faculty Representative Nicholas Bowman Patrick Pauken © 2016 LaDonna R. Moore All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dafina-Lazarus Stewart, Advisor Microaggressions reflect the active manifestation of oppressive worldviews that create, maintain, and perpetuate marginalization (Sue, 2010a). Individuals from marginalized backgrounds “describe their work climate as hostile, invalidating, and insulting because of microaggressions that assail their race, gender, or sexual-orientation identities” (Sue, 2010a, p. 213). The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between microaggression and the work experience of mid-level student affairs professionals within higher education, specifically those from marginalized populations that pertain to race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religious affiliation, or disability. Participants completed a web-based survey that measured their interactions with microaggression and its relationship with their leadership practices. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression analyses were performed to analyze the data for this study. The results of this study confirm what the extant literature, focused on the experience of higher education professionals, has demonstrated. Prior studies have found that administrators within higher education encounter microaggression (Alabi, 2014; Garvey & Drezner, 2013). Within this study, 78.3% of participants reported that they have experienced microaggression within the workplace. These individuals also revealed that the forms of microaggression they experience most frequently included microinvalidations, followed by microinsults.
    [Show full text]
  • Microaggressions: Triggers and Responses
    Microaggressions: Triggers and Responses WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY TEACHING ROUNDTABLE LORNA HERNANDEZ JARVIS, ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT FOR DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION, AND CDO For personal/individual use only. Do not copy or distribute any of this material without the author’s permission Inclusive Excellence in Higher Education Colleges and universities are to create environments in which everyone feels welcome, encouraged to learn and flourish Many who do not conform to dominant demographics don’t always feel included, and their academic learning experience is negatively impacted. Microaggressions point out cultural difference in ways that put the target’s non-conformity into sharp focus often causing anxiety and crises of belonging. We must find ways to engage with difference in more intelligent and nuanced ways, and train our minds to entertain more complex views of the world. Inclusive Excellence in Higher Education Exclusion, Alienation, and discrimination persist within the academy Racism, sexism, homophobia, and other forms of discrimination are in fact commonplace. Many see the responses to microaggressions as overreactions Implicit biases have serious consequences beyond hurt feelings: Discriminatory hiring Racial inequities in policing and broader criminal justice Physical and psychological Health impact Microaggressions matter because they are SYMPTOMS AND CAUSES of a larger structural problem Inclusive Excellence in Higher Education Call to downplay microaggressions underestimates the powerful effect of sanctioning
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Racial Microaggressions
    Examples of Racial Microaggressions Theme Microaggression Message Alien in own land “Where are you from?” You are not American When Asian Americans and Latino “Where were you born?” You are a foreigner Americans are assumed to be “You speak good English.” foreign-born A person asking an Asian American to teach them words in their native language. Ascription of Intelligence “You are a credit to your race.” People of color are generally not as Assigning intelligence to a person of “You are so articulate.” intelligent as Whites. color on the basis of their race. Asking an Asian person to help with a It is unusual for someone of your Math or Science problem. race to be intelligent. All Asians are intelligent and good in Math / Sciences. Color Blindness “When I look at you, I don’t see Denying a person of color’s racial / Statements that indicate that a White color.” ethnic experiences. person does not want to “America is a melting pot.” Assimilate / acculturate to the acknowledge race “There is only one race, the human dominant culture. race.” Denying the individual as a racial / cultural being. Criminality – assumption of criminal A White man or woman clutching You are a criminal. status their purse or checking their wallet as You are going to steal / You are poor A person of color is presumed to be a Black or Latino approaches or / You do not belong / You are dangerous, criminal, or deviant on passes. dangerous. the basis of their race. A store owner following a customer of color around the store.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Invisible Visible: Gender Microaggressions
    UNH ADVANCE INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATION An NSF funded program to improve the climate for UNH faculty through fair and equitable policies, practices and leadership development. Making the Invisible Visible: Gender Microaggressions Imagine these scenarios: You are a member of a faculty search committee hiring an committee member frequently looks at her chest, which makes assistant professor in biology. The committee is just starting a the candidate very uncomfortable. The committee member face-to-face interview with a candidate named Maria Vasquez. seems unaware of her behavior. She has dark hair, dark eyes, and a tan complexion. Most During a meeting of the faculty search committee on which you committee members assume Dr. Vasquez is Latina. One of your are serving, almost every time a female colleague tries to speak, colleagues asks an ice-breaking question, “Where are you from?” she is interrupted by a male colleague. No one says anything Dr. Vasquez responds, “Minneapolis.” Your colleague follows-up when this happens. Finally, your female colleague stops trying with, “No, I mean, where do you come from originally?” to ofer contributions to the discussion. You wonder what she Dr. Vasquez frowns. “Minneapolis,” she repeats with an edge to wanted to say. her voice. An African American man named Alex is a candidate for a A search committee hiring a department chair in environmental tenure-track job in chemistry. During his on-campus interview, science is meeting to discuss the fnal list of candidates, which the chairperson of the search committee is giving him a tour. As includes two men and one women.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Confronting Racial Microagression: an Imperative for Social Work Critical Social Work 17(1) Shandra S
    Critical Social Work School of Social Work University of Windsor 401 Sunset Avenue Windsor, Ont. Canada N9B 3P4 Email: [email protected] Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information can be found at: http://uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork Link to article: http://www1.uwindsor.ca/criticalsocialwork/microagression Critical Social Work, 2016 Vol. 17, No. 1 17 Forrest-Bank Understanding and Confronting Racial Microagression: An Imperative for Social Work Critical Social Work 17(1) Shandra S. Forrest-Bank University of Tennessee, Knoxville Abstract Racial discrimination is a matter of public health and social justice and an issue that lies at the very heart of the social work profession. Modern forms of racial discrimination are frequently hidden, subtle, and unintended. This type of discrimination, described by the construct of racial microaggression, poses significant challenges to social work practitioners, educators, and researchers striving to promote justice and equality. The construct, however, also offers a powerful tool for understanding and intervening in discrimination. This paper defines and traces recent developments related to the concept of racial microaggression and discusses how acts of microaggression perpetuate prejudice and oppression. The tenets of Critical Race Theory, in which the construct of microaggression is grounded, is presented with a discussion for why postracial discourse may be counterproductive toward efforts aimed at deconstructing and eliminating racism. The paper concludes with specific recommendations for how the social work profession can integrate knowledge about microaggression into practice, policy, education, research, and intervention in a way that avoids potential pitfalls associated with addressing this sensitive issue. Keywords: Critical Race Theory, postracial discourse, racial discrimination, racial microaggression, subtle racism Critical Social Work, 2016 Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Language As Microaggression: the New Lexicon of American Racism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eGrove (Univ. of Mississippi) University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2012 Language as Microaggression: the New Lexicon of American Racism Juan Thurmond Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Thurmond, Juan, "Language as Microaggression: the New Lexicon of American Racism" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 283. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/283 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LANGUAGE AS MICROAGGRESSION: THE NEW LEXICON OF AMERICAN RACISM A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Mississippi by Juan Thurmond December 2012 Copyright © 2012 by Juan Thurmond ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT There are countless occasions where marginalized groups bear witness to language-based discriminatory practices. Language, as defined here, is a species of symbolism. After reviewing the sociological literature, the term “microaggressions” appears to best describe the phenomena in its everyday occurrences. Microaggressions are “the brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial, gender, sexual-orientation, and religious slights and insults to the target person or group” (Sue, Capodilupo, et al., 2007; Sue, 2010). Sue classifies microaggressions into three forms: microassaults, microinsults, microinvalidations. The purpose of the project was tri-fold.
    [Show full text]
  • Microaggressions
    Microaggressions “Microaggressions are the everyday encounters of subtle discrimination that people of various marginalized groups experience throughout their lives.” (Derald Sue, 2014) Microaggressions can be -Unconscious: The person is not aware that what they said was wrong and offensive -Unintentional: The person is not aware of the effects that their words and actions have on the people around them Some common themes of LGBTQIA microaggressions: a) Use of heterosexist or genderist terminology b) Endorsement of heteronormative culture and behaviors c) The assumption of a universal LGBTQIA experience d) Discomfort or disapproval of LGBTQIA experience e) A suggestion of abnormality f) Denial of bodily privacy Below are some common microaggressions that LGBTQIA people experience. Many of these microaggressions are common to more than one identity, but are grouped by identity for the purposes of this discussion. Questions to consider: 1) Why is each question or statement microaggressive? 2) Why is the question or statement harmful to the particular group? 3) What can you do when you hear people make the statements or ask the questions listed below? Lesbians “You’re too attractive to be a lesbian.” “How do you have sex?” “Have you ever had a sexual relationship with a man?” “What led you to be lesbian?” “So who is the man in the relationship?” “Do you have a boyfriend?” (asked by people who do not know her identity) “What form of birth control do you use?” (asked by health care providers) Gay Men “That’s so gay.” “I’m not being homophobic—you’re
    [Show full text]
  • Reacting to Microaggressions: Do Individual Identity Processing Styles Play a Role? Suraj Patel University of South Carolina - Aiken
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons USC Aiken Psychology Theses Psychology Department 5-2015 Reacting to Microaggressions: Do Individual Identity Processing Styles Play a Role? Suraj Patel University of South Carolina - Aiken Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/aiken_psychology_theses Part of the Community Psychology Commons, Personality and Social Contexts Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Patel, Suraj, "Reacting to Microaggressions: Do Individual Identity Processing Styles Play a Role?" (2015). USC Aiken Psychology Theses. 16. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/aiken_psychology_theses/16 This Thesis is brought to you by the Psychology Department at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in USC Aiken Psychology Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTING TO MICROAGGRESSIONS 1 Reacting to Microaggressions: Do Individual Identity Processing Styles Play a Role? A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Psychology University of South Carolina Aiken In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science By Suraj Patel May 2015 REACTING TO MICROAGGRESSIONS 2 Abstract The majority of literature on the impact of microaggressions focuses on ethnic minority stereotypes with little research on how microaggressions and negative stereotypes affect other types of minority groups, such as minorities based on social group. Additionally, within the literature on general group membership, it has been found that social disapproval results in the typical, global response of negative affect. However, the behaviors that are evoked by the negative affect differ considerably among individuals whether the response is to strengthen, maintain, or avoid interpersonal conflict (Richman & Leary, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Developing and Evaluating Queervibe: an Online Intervention to Empower Trans and Non-Binary Youth
    DEVELOPING AND EVALUATING QUEERVIBE: AN ONLINE INTERVENTION TO EMPOWER TRANS AND NON-BINARY YOUTH SAM MARTIN A thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Anglia Ruskin University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Psychology) School of Psychology and Sport Science Faculty of Science and Engineering Anglia Ruskin University Supervised by: Dr Daragh T. McDermott Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK & Dr Russell Luyt Department of Psychology, Social Work and Counselling, University of Greenwich, London, UK Submitted May 2019 Table of Contents Table of contents i Funding vii Acknowledgements viii Publications xi Abstract xiii Tables xiv Figures xv Appendices xvi Abbreviations xvii Reflexive Statement I: Positionality and Power 1 Chapter 1: Background & Overview 4 1.1 Background 4 1.2 Minority Stress 8 1.3 General Overview 10 Chapter 2: Everyday Prejudice and masculinities 14 2.1 Prejudice or Phobia? 14 2.2 Prejudice 17 2.3 Modern Prejudice 20 2.4 Everyday Prejudice and Microaggressions 22 2.5 Microaggressions 23 2.5.1 Microaggression Taxonomy 25 2.5.2 Experience of Microaggressions 28 2.5.3 Reacting to Microaggressions 29 2.5.4 Responding to Microaggressions 29 2.5.5 Criticism of Microaggressions 30 2.5.6 Intersectionality 32 i 2.6 Everyday Prejudice and Masculinities 33 2.6.1 Hegemonic Masculinity 35 2.6.2 Inclusive Masculinity 38 2.6.3 Gay Masculinities 39 2.7 Queer Theory 40 2.8 Queer Masculinities 43 2.9 Trans Masculinities 45 2.10 Chapter Summary 46 Chapter 3: Power, Empowerment and
    [Show full text]
  • Using Critical Race Theory to Respond to Everyday Racism
    Racial Microaggressions: Using Critical Race Theory to Respond to Everyday Racism Daniel Solorzano University of California, Los Angeles Presented to: East Los Angeles College Townhall September 30, 2020 Racism Pandemic Economic Health Pandemic Pandemic Environmental Pandemic “Call to Action” 3. Campuses must audit classroom climate and create an action plan to create inclusive classrooms and anti-racism curriculum. Chancellor Eloy Ortiz Oakley & 10 Members of His Cabinet What are Racial Microaggressions and Microaffirmations Why They Matter Brief History of How I Got Here 1972 1990 My Introduction to Asset-Based Community Research Manuel R. Solorzano, Sr. Las Dos Banderas Bakery 1968 to 1972 1964 1972 1970 Use the Q&A What Were the 1st Tools You Found to Help You Recognize and Understand Racism? Race, Ethnic, & Gender Studies Critical Race & Freirean Gender Pedagogy Theory 1993 A Working Definition of Critical Race Theory in Education Critical race theory is the work of scholars who are developing an explanatory framework that accounts for the role of race and racism in education. CRTE works toward identifying and challenging racism in its historical and contemporary forms as part of a larger goal of identifying and challenging all forms of subordination. Centers Race and Racism Challenges Challenges Dominant Ahistoricism CRT in Frameworks ED Commitment Centers to Social Experiential Justice Knowledge Using Critical Race Theory, I Examine Everyday Racism Racial Microaggressions are one Form of Everyday Racism 1994 Chester M. Pierce Microaggressions Professor of Psychiatry and Education at the Medical School and Graduate School of Education at Harvard University Microaggressions In F. Barbour (Ed.), The Black Seventies (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • MICROAGGRESSIONS BETWEEN the RACES a Thesis Presented To
    MICROAGGRESSIONS BETWEEN THE RACES A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Virginia Audene Maher May, 2016 MICROAGGRESSIONS BETWEEN THE RACES Virginia Audene Maher Thesis Approved: Accepted: ____________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Interim Dean of the College Dr. Kathleen D. Clark Dr. John Green ____________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Andrew Rancer Dr. Chand Midha ____________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Date Dr. Yang Lin _____________________________ Interim School Director Dr. J. Thomas Dukes ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee for all the guidance and expertise that they have shared with me during the process of writing this thesis. A very special thanks to Dr. Kathleen Clark, for never giving up on me and helping me to not give up on my self, she has been an unwavering sounding board and advisor. Dr. Lin supported me with the idea of using the archive and giving wise advice on expanding the knowledge of the topic. Thanks to Dr. Rancer for asking the right questions and making me think more critically about my research. I thank you all for being in my corner and helping me achieve my ultimate goal of attaining my Master of Arts in Communication. I would also like to acknowledge my Family for all of the support they have given me though out my educational journey. Tim, you are the best husband for supporting me and putting up with my stress induced moods. My children Allison and Matthew, thank you for keeping the house in order on the nights I was in class and for understanding when I had to put homework first.
    [Show full text]