DOCSLIB.ORG

Giambattista Vico and Ethics of War in the Techno-Logical Era

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Giambattista Vico and Ethics of War in the Techno-Logical Era UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE War by Algorithm: Giambattista Vico and Ethics of War in the Techno-Logical Era DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Political Science by John Robert Emery Dissertation Committee: Associate Professor Daniel R. Brunstetter, Chair Professor Cecelia M. Lynch Professor Brent J. Steele 2019 © 2019 John Robert Emery Table of Contents Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iv CURRICULUM VITAE v ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION vi INTRODUCTION 1 Questions of Modernity and Its Legacy in Contemporary Techno-Warfare 12 Ethics of War and Artificial Intelligence 16 Connecting Technologies of War and Ethics 22 CHAPTER 1: Giambattista Vico: Law, Language, and Eloquence in Interpretivist 29 International Relations Vichian Humanism 37 Natural Law 41 Against Descartes and Abstract Rationalism 49 Language and Social Construction 55 Science of Imagination in an Intersubjective World 63 Conclusion: Vico’s Impact on Ethics of War Today 70 CHAPTER 2: AI and the Poetic Wisdom of Giambattista Vico: Ethics of War in The 78 Technological Era Ethics Of War Today 81 Giambattista Vico and Just War 93 Poetic Wisdom 99 Artificial Intelligence and Just War Tomorrow 107 CHAPTER 3: The Cold War Game: Quest for Certainty in the Nuclear Era 111 The Cold War Game 115 Futurecasting: Social Sciences Vs. Mathematics 135 Technostrategic Discourse and The Ethics of War 150 Human-Machine Integration and the Rise of Precision-Guided Munitions 166 Conclusion 168 CHAPTER 4: Probabilities Toward Death: Algorithmic Warfare, Machine-Learning 171 Assassinations, and Techno-Ethics. ii Techno-Ethics: From Practical Judgment to Computation in Western Warfare 177 Machine-Learning Assassination and the Erosion of the Subject 188 Artificial Intelligence: The False Promises of Perfect Rationality 193 Conclusion 201 CHAPTER 5: Conclusion 208 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express the deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Daniel R. Brunstetter. His friendship, guidance, and mentorship throughout my PhD program was instrumental to me becoming the scholar that I am. He helped me carve out a space for my own voice in political science, balancing my countless interests from political theory, to technology, and grappling with the dilemmas of war in new and interesting ways. Without his pragmatic mentality that never sacrificed genuine novel scholarship, I would not have been able to complete these six grueling years; I am forever grateful to Daniel. It was his faith in me and my work that led to our first of many co-authored publications, as well as opening doors to build a supportive network of scholars from our first conference together. In the end, this dissertation could not have been completed without Daniel’s unending comments on drafts and assistance in framing my work within an established literature while still paving my own path. He is truly someone I am proud to have worked with and to forever call a friend. I would also like to thank Brent Steele for his friendship and assistance navigating the world of ethics, conflict, and International Relations. He has been an influential figure in my scholarship from our first meeting at UCI through many beer meetings at every conference around the globe. Brent has showed me a way to enjoy every minute of what I do and not get bogged down in researching too narrow a topic just to fill a gap in the literature that doesn’t need to be filled. I would also like to extend my thanks to Cecelia Lynch for aiding me in interrogating my methodological, epistemological, and philosophical assumptions. My first course with her at UCI was mostly spent looking up words like epistemology and ontology, but her interpretive methods course truly helped me articulate and find a space for the work I had been doing all along. Without her broad and exciting course readings, I may have relegated myself to compromising my scholarly values in the name of expediency. Cecelia has influenced my work more than she may realize and this dissertation is a result of that philosophical and methodological influence. I would also like to extend a special thanks to Bill Mauer and Mona Lynch for a fantastic year of debate, discussion, and workshopping for the NSF-funded Technology, Law, and Society working group and a successful summer institute. Without this interdisciplinary environment, my work on technology in warfare would not be what it is today. To all of my friends and colleagues in graduate school at UCI and beyond, I am forever indebted to your friendship and support through what was a trying six years. You were always there to celebrate my successes and commiserate in our failings. Graduate school is not possible without love and commiseration from those that are all struggling through a PhD program. To my wife Lilianna, you have seen my highs and lows of this dissertation with your unending compassion and support in a tenuous job market, I am lucky to call myself your partner, I love you. Finally, I would like to thank my mother and father, Jo Ann and Bob Emery, who have always prioritized and sacrificed for my education, I know how proud you are of me and I could never have imagined achieving a PhD without your love and constant encouragement. Thank you, this achievement is our cumulative success. iv CURRICULUM VITAE John Robert Emery 2012 B.A. in European Studies, Minor Italian Studies, Gonzaga University 2016 M.A. in Political Science, University of California, Irvine 2017-2018 Technology, Law, & Society Fellowship funded by the Early-concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER) of the National Science Foundation, University of California, Irvine 2019 Ph.D. in Political Science, University of California, Irvine FIELD OF STUDY International Relations, Ethics of War and Peace, Critical Security Studies, and Political Theory PUBLICATIONS Emery, John R. (R&R) “Probabilities Toward Death: Algorithmic Warfare, Machine-Learning Assassinations, and Techno-Ethics.” Emery, John R. (2017) “Balancing Security, Risk, and Uncertainty in an Era of Contested and Fragmented Sovereignty.” In Daniel Brunstetter and Jean-Vincent Holeindre (Eds.), The Ethics of War and Peace Revisited: Moral Challenges in an Era of Contested and Fragmented Sovereignty.Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. Emery, John R. (2016) “The Promises and Pitfalls of Humanitarian Drones.” Ethics & International Affairs 30 no. 2: 153-165. DOI: 10.1017/S0892679415000556. Emery, John R. & Brunstetter, D. (2016) “Restricting the Preventive Use of Force: Drones, the Struggle Against Non-State Actors and Jus ad Vim.” In Kerstin Fisk and Jennifer Ramos (Eds.), Preventive Force: Drones Targeted Killing and the Transformation of Contemporary Warfare. New York: New York University Press. Emery, John R. & Brunstetter, D. (2015) “Drones as Aerial Occupation.” Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice 27 no. 4: 424-431. DOI: 10.1080/10402659.2015.1094319. v ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION War by Algorithm: Giambattista Vico and Ethics of War in the Techno-Logical Era By John Robert Emery Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Irvine, 2019 Associate Professor Daniel Brunstetter, Chair In an era where humans are increasingly being replaced or augmented by technological innovation, how might the humanist tradition offer us guiding questions for ethics of war today? My talk will explore the U.S. discourse of how improved battlefield technology is believed to make Western war an inherently more ethical space that eases the liberal conscience in killing. Drawing on the logics and practices of U.S. war making, my talk will address three phases of the transition from an ethics of practical judgment and due care to a computational techno-ethics of war. First, it traces the rise of smart bombs alongside collateral damage estimation software. Second, I examine the machine-learning processes that constructs ‘legitimate targets’ in US drone strikes via heterogeneous correlations of SIM card metadata. Third, I survey the consequences of a quantified global battlefield and the improbability of ‘meaningful human control’ over artificially intelligent ‘killer robots’. War by algorithm ultimately removes us from the act of killing while proffering a more ethical ‘science of warfare’. These practices enable decision-makers to tick the ethical box of due care with technology that is believed to be objective and neutral, yet in reality, has simply buried bias deep within the algorithmic code. Not only do these technologies of war and big data shape our caPacity to think ethically, but fundamentally call us to reassess how complex ethico- political dilemmas of war could be replaced by computation. What is at stake is the erosion of effective constraints on the use of lethal force because this techno-rationalization of a quantified risk assessment has supplanted ethical decision-making, the site of the body, and emotions in contemporary conflict. Ultimately, I will argue that the science of humanity of Giambattista Vico, allows us to rethink algorithmic epistemologies of war in novel ways that bring the human back to the forefront of ethical decision-making in the 21st Century. vi Introduction “Today we glory in science and in cybernetic instruments, entrusting our future to them, forgetting that we still have the problem of finding ‘data,’ of ‘inventing them,’ since the cybernetic process can only elaborate them and draw consequences from them. The problem of the essence of the human genius and of its creativity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Philosophy Rev
    Designed by John Cornet, Phoenix HS (Ore) Western Philosophy rev. September 2012 The very process of philosophy has been a driving force in the tranformation of the world. From the figure who dwells upon how to achieve power, to the minister who contemplates the paradox of the only truth (their faith) yet which is also stagnent, to the astronomers who are searching the stars for signs of other civilizations, to the revolutionaries who sought to construct a national government which would protect the rights of the minority, the very exercise of philosophy and philosophical thought is at a core of human nature. Philosophy addresses what are sometimes called the "big questions." These include questions of morality and ethics, ideology/faith,, politics, the truth of knowledge, the nature of reality, and the meaning of human existance (...just to name a few!) (Religion addresses some of the same questions, but while philosophy and religion overlap in some questions, they can and do differ significantly in the approach they take to answering them.) Subject Learning Outcomes Skills-Based Learning Outcomes Behavioral Expectations and Grading Policy Develop an appreciation for and enjoyment of Organize, maintain and learn how to study from a learning, particularly in how learning should subject-specific notebook Attendance, participation and cause us to question what we think we know Be able to demonstrate how to take notes (including being prepared are daily and have a willingness to entertain new utilizing two-column format) expectations perspectives on issues. Be able to engage in meaningful, substantive discussion A classroom culture of respect and Students will develop familiarity with major with others.
    [Show full text]
  • Works on Giambattista Vico in English from 1884 Through 2009
    Works on Giambattista Vico in English from 1884 through 2009 COMPILED BY MOLLY BLA C K VERENE TABLE OF CON T EN T S PART I. Books A. Monographs . .84 B. Collected Volumes . 98 C. Dissertations and Theses . 111 D. Journals......................................116 PART II. Essays A. Articles, Chapters, et cetera . 120 B. Entries in Reference Works . 177 C. Reviews and Abstracts of Works in Other Languages ..180 PART III. Translations A. English Translations ............................186 B. Reviews of Translations in Other Languages.........192 PART IV. Citations...................................195 APPENDIX. Bibliographies . .302 83 84 NEW VICO STUDIE S 27 (2009) PART I. BOOKS A. Monographs Adams, Henry Packwood. The Life and Writings of Giambattista Vico. London: Allen and Unwin, 1935; reprinted New York: Russell and Russell, 1970. REV I EWS : Gianturco, Elio. Italica 13 (1936): 132. Jessop, T. E. Philosophy 11 (1936): 216–18. Albano, Maeve Edith. Vico and Providence. Emory Vico Studies no. 1. Series ed. D. P. Verene. New York: Peter Lang, 1986. REV I EWS : Daniel, Stephen H. The Eighteenth Century: A Current Bibliography, n.s. 12 (1986): 148–49. Munzel, G. F. New Vico Studies 5 (1987): 173–75. Simon, L. Canadian Philosophical Reviews 8 (1988): 335–37. Avis, Paul. The Foundations of Modern Historical Thought: From Machiavelli to Vico. Beckenham (London): Croom Helm, 1986. REV I EWS : Goldie, M. History 72 (1987): 84–85. Haddock, Bruce A. New Vico Studies 5 (1987): 185–86. Bedani, Gino L. C. Vico Revisited: Orthodoxy, Naturalism and Science in the ‘Scienza nuova.’ Oxford: Berg, 1989. REV I EWS : Costa, Gustavo. New Vico Studies 8 (1990): 90–92.
    [Show full text]
  • Giambattista Vico Y La Hermenéutica Social Cinta Moebio 4: 128-145
    Toledo, U. 1998. Giambattista Vico y la hermenéutica social Cinta moebio 4: 128-145 www.moebio.uchile.cl/04/vico.htm Giambattista Vico y la Hermenéutica Social Ulises Toledo Nickels. Doctor (c) en Filosofía. Profesor Universidad San Sebastián. Concepción "Uno de los signos de los escritores de genio es que lo que dicen, puede, a veces, tocar un nervio central en las mentes o los sentimientos de los hombre que pertenecen a otras épocas, culturas o perspectivas, y establecen trenes de pensamiento y arrastran consecuencias que no se les ocurrieron o pudieron no ocurrírseles a tales escritores y todavía menos preocupar sus mentes" Isaiah Berlin "Vico de hecho lo dice ya todo; pero la abstracción e interpretación conceptual la deja a cargo de la posterioridad" Richard Peters Protosociología y Heterogénesis de los Fines (*) El pensador napolitano Giambattista Vico (1668–1744) de reconocida autoridad en el campo de la investigación histórica es considerado, también, el inaugurador de la Filosofía de la Historia en una época en la cual aún no existía una denominación específica para designar ese tipo de estudio (1). No obstante, en el presente trabajo proponemos que su mérito es más extenso y profundo; de hecho anticipa ideas (2) que posteriormente alcanzan un amplio desarrollo por parte de filósofos, historiadores, politólogos, psicólogos y cientistas sociales. Se mencionan los nombres de Hegel, Dilthtey, Spengler, Niebhur, Mommsen, la teoría sobre Homero de Wolf, la interpretación de la mitología de Bachofen, la reconstrucción del pasado en base a etimologías de Grimm, el entendimiento histórico de las leyes de Savigny y el de la ciudad antigua y el feudalismo de Foustel de Coulanges, la teoría sobre la lucha de clases de Marx y Sorel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophy of the Imagination in Vico and Malebranche
    STRUMENTI PER LA DIDATTICA E LA RICERCA – 86 – Paolo Fabiani The Philosophy of the Imagination in Vico and Malebranche Translated and Edited by Giorgio Pinton Firenze University Press 2009 the philosophy of the imagination in Vico and male- branche / paolo Fabiani. – Firenze : Firenze university press, 2009. (strumenti per la didattica e la ricerca ; 86) http://digital.casalini.it/97864530680 isBn 978-88-6453-066-6 (print) isBn 978-88-6453-068-0 (online) immagine di copertina: © elenaray | dreamstime.com progetto grafico di alberto pizarro Fernández © 2009 Firenze university press università degli studi di Firenze Firenze university press Borgo albizi, 28, 50122 Firenze, italy http://www.fupress.com/ Printed in Italy “In memory of my mother ... to honor the courage of my father” Paolo Fabiani “This is more than my book, it also represents Giorgio Pinton’s interpretation of the imagi- nation in early modern philosophy. In several places of my work he felt obliged to simplify the arguments to easy the reading; he did it in agreement with me. In a few others, he substituted, with intelligence and without forcing, the structure of the original academic version in a differ- ent narrative organization of the contents. He has done a great job. It is an honor for me that the most important translator of Vico’s Latin Works into Eng- lish translated and edited my first philosophical essay. I heartly thank Giorgio Pinton, a true master of philosophy; Alexander Bertland, a very good scholar in Vico studies; and the editorial staff of FUP, expecially
    [Show full text]
  • A Theological Comparison of Joseph Ratzinger and John Milbank
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Truth and Politics: A Theological Comparison Of Joseph Ratzinger and John Milbank A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Theology and Religious Studies Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Sacred Theology By Peter Samuel Kucer Washington, D.C. 2012 Truth and Politics: A Theological Comparison Of Joseph Ratzinger and John Milbank Peter Samuel Kucer, S.T.D. Director: Chad C. Pecknold, Ph.D. Joseph Ratzinger and the Anglican scholar John Milbank have written extensively on the social and political order from a theological perspective. The main aspect which distinguishes Ratzinger’s theology of politics from Milbank’s political theology is how each theologian orients his thought on the question of truth, and most specifically how each theologian understands and relocates Vico’s claim that verum est factum (the truth is made). While Ratzinger is critical of Vico’s account of the socially constructed nature of truth, Milbank, on the other hand, embraces Vico in a way which validates it. The political consequences which logically follow these two philosophical approaches to Vico illustrate a central difference between Ratzinger and Milbank. As a result of these differing responses to Vico on truth, the dissertation argues that Ratzinger and Milbank take up different ways of relating socialism to the Trinitarian faith. Ratzinger’s critical appreciation of socialism, but rejection of all political models as expressive of Trinitarian faith, and Milbank’s promotion of socialism as integral to Trinitarian faith in practice are rooted in their reactions to Vico.
    [Show full text]
  • Vico and Descartes: from Rationalism to Historicism
    VICO AND DESCARTES VICO AND DESCARTES: FROM RATIONALISM TO HISTORICISM By FIORE GUIDO, B.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts (September) 1986 MASTER OF ARTS (1986) McMASTER UNIVERSITY (Philosophy) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Vico and Descartes: From Rationalism to Historicism AUTHOR: Fiore Guido, B.A. (University of Toronto) B.A. (McMaster University) M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Albert Shalom NUMBER OF PAGES: vii, 156 ii This work is dedicated to the solitary individual: Though he may have not understood, he and he alone would not have misunderstood. iii ------------ ABSTRACT In this work, we shall argue that the originality of Giambattista Vico in the history of anti-Cartesianism lies not simply, as it is generally believed, in his dissent from the anti-historical tenets of Cartesianism, but in his radical departure from the Cartesian conception of the universe. For Vico, in our view, was one of the very first, if not the first, thinker to recognise fully the implications of Cartesian mechanism and to, consequently, reject the Cartesian conception of nature and (correlatively) the Cartesian conception of man. His "nuova scienza", with its intrinsically dynamic universe and its fundamentally historical man, must therefore be understood as a fundamentally anti-Cartesian science of reality. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work owes its existence to the support and assistance of various individuals whose contribution must be acknowledged, though I alone am responsible for its imperfections. I am extremely grateful to my supervisor, Professor Albert Shalom, a great teacher and a truly compassionate individual, who willingly bore the burden of guiding an impulsive and insecure young scholar through the task of writing his first thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • GIAMBATTISTA VICO (1668-1744) Maria Teresa Maiullari1
    The following text was originally published in Prospects: the quarterly review of comparative education (Paris, UNESCO: International Bureau of Education), vol. XXIV, no. 3/4, 1994, p. 731-741. ©UNESCO: International Bureau of Education, 2000 This document may be reproduced free of charge as long as acknowledgment is made of the source. GIAMBATTISTA VICO (1668-1744) Maria Teresa Maiullari1 The inaugural discourses Vico was born in Naples on 23 June 1668, the son of Antonio Vico (1638-1706), a bookseller, and Candida Masullo (1633-99). He completed his elementary and secondary education at the Jesuit School. An intellectual conception common to many young men in the upper classes attending Jesuit schools during the eighteenth century marked the form and, in part, the content of Vico’s later meditations. The images and metaphors in his writings are taken from a biblical and classical repertoire. Vico’s Jesuit education led to the acquisition of an expressive vocabulary that he used to communicate new ideas about the concept and practice of education. After finishing his studies in ‘literature’ and completing a specialization in ‘rhetoric’, he was appointed Professor of Rhetoric at the Royal University of Naples. On 18 October 1699, at the age of 31, Vico gave the first of his ‘Inaugural Discourses’. Following the tradition of contemporary Italian universities, a lecture opened the academic year and clarified certain educational intentions of the teacher. From 1699 to 1706 Vico gave these Orazioni Inaugurali [Inaugural Discourses] which were collected and published in a volume ending with a ‘Final Dissertation’. This work is the fruit of the first phase of Vico’s thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Sixteen. the Christian Attack on Greco-Roman Culture, Ca. 135
    Chapter Sixteen The Christian Attack on GrecoRoman Culture. ca. 135 to 235 Over the course of about four hundred years, from the early second century to the early sixth, Greco-Roman civilization was replaced by Christendom. More precisely, the gods were replaced by God and by Satan. When all the other gods were driven from the field the sole remaining god ceased to be a common noun and became instead a proper name, AGod.@1 That sole remaining god was the god of the Judaeans and Christians. Satan was his diametrically opposed counterpart, the personification of Evil. The god of the Judaeans and Christians had begun in the southern Levant, during the Late Bronze Age, as Yahweh sabaoth (AYahweh of the armies@). He became the patron god of the Sons of Israel, and during the reigns of David and Solomon his cult-center was moved to Jerusalem in Judah. In the seventh century BC monolatrist priests and kings in Jerusalem made Yahweh the only god who could be worshiped in Judah and began addressing him as Adonai (Amy Lord@). For Hellenistic Judaeans he was Adonai in Hebrew, and in Greek was Kyrios (ALord@) or ho theos hypsistos (Athe highest god@). For the Pharisees and rabbis, who supposed that even the title Adonai was too holy to be uttered, he was simply ha-shem (Athe Name@). Among early Christians he was Athe Father@ or Aour Father,@ and in the fourth century he became AGod the Father,@ a title which distinguished him from AGod the Son.@ Although they addressed him with different terms, Judaeans and Christians agreed that they were invoking the same god,2 who had created the world, had wiped out almost all living things in Noah=s Flood, had been worshiped by all of Noah=s immediate descendants, but had then been forgotten by humankind until he made himself known to Abraham.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Complexity of the Universal Order in Vico's Establishing Principles
    systems Communication On the Complexity of the Universal Order in Vico’s Establishing Principles Taha Al-Douri 1,2 1 School of Architecture and Design, New York Institute of Technology, 1855 Broadway, New York, NY 10023, USA; [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +1-971-50-737-3243 or +1-917-603-6098 2 International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research And Cybernetics (I.I.A.S), P.O. Box 3010, Tecumseh, ON N8N 2M3, Canada Academic Editors: Josue Antonio Nescolarde Selva and Josep-Lluis Usó-Doménech Received: 30 December 2016; Accepted: 12 March 2017; Published: 3 April 2017 Abstract: In his seminal work The Principles of a New Science of the Common Nature of Nations (Principii di una scienza nuova d’intorno alla natura delle nazioni, published in 1725 then again in 1730 and posthumously in 1744), Giambattista Vico (Born in 1668) wrote to qualify the scientific to include the humanities and their complexity beyond the popular Cartesian circumscription within the laws of physics—divinely instituted and set in motion—in describing its phenomena. The work is, for one, a manifesto of the essential complexity inherent in universal order, and against a reduction of scholarship to the pure sciences, in which elimination is key. Vico proposed a structure that afforded the organic integration of the humanities within the laws of physics as parts of “a tree of knowledge” whose trunk branched out into a progression toward certainty, drawn out of the most fluid humanities at the roots, in an order of premise and conclusion. The tree metaphor is the juncture of early moments of disparity and interdependence between complexity, on the one hand, and certainty on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • After Vico) Donald Kunze Penn State University
    Vichianism (After Vico) Donald Kunze Penn State University Who Was Giambattista Vico? Giambattista Vico (1668-1744) was an original philosopher of culture who contributed in diverse ways to the intellectual life of Europe from the Eighteenth Century onward. His theories about culture and human development anticipated those of Hegel, Spengler, Marx, Piaget, and even Freud and Lacan. His idea of sequential stages of history and thought anticipated the meta- theories of Hayden White, Stephen Pepper, and Karl Mannheim, where periods of history, schools of thought, political attitudes, and modes of perception are determined by the forms of metaphor. He was promoted by such major figures as the French historian Jules Michelet, the Italian humanist critic Benedetto Croce, the Irish novelist James Joyce, and the British philosopher and critic Sir Isaiah Berlin. Yet, partly owing to his style of writing but also to his attempt to frame his theories within a mixture of poetic imagery and autobiographic involvement, Vico’s works have been among the most misread and misunderstood of any philosopher. Vico’s conception of the human imagination, based on a dynamic model of signification, is perhaps the most original and complex ever conceived. His ability to relate linguistics, psychology, environmental factors, and philosophy within a single theory of culture remains, at least in its ambition and scope, unparalleled. Vico was born in Naples, Italy, the son of a bookseller. He received his early education from local grammar schools and Jesuit tutors. Although he graduated from the University of Naples in 1694 as a doctor of Civil and Canon Law, he characterized himself as a life-long autodidact.
    [Show full text]
  • Nancy Du Bois Marcus, Vico and Plato. Emory Studies Vol. 8, New York
    Book Review: Vico and Plato 1 9 7 Nancy du Bois Marcus, Vico and Plato. Emory Studies Vol. 8, New York, Washington, Baltimore, Bern, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Brussels, Vienna, Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing, 2001, xiii + 261 pp., $57.95. M A RCO A NDREACCHIO [email protected] Giambattista Vico (1668-1744) is renowned in our day as the father of historicism. Why then would the Institute for Vico Studies at Emory University authorize the publication of a book claiming that, far from being a historicist, Vico is a philosopher in the tradition of Plato and Aristotle? The apparent contradiction involved in a center of studies promoting historicism’s synthesis of history and philosophy and at the same time inviting a reading of its spiritual father as a Platonist at heart, is only apparent. The fact that there have been at least as many readings of Plato as there have been of Vico invites the suspicion that a historicist appeal to Vico’s Platonism will be sustained by a historicist reading of Plato, not to speak of a historicist reading of historicism itself. The suspicion in question is reinforced by a careful reading of Nancy du Bois Marcus’s otherwise most eloquent study, Vico and Plato. Marcus presents two general theses concerning Vico: the first is that he was not a historicist; the second is that he is the first philosopher to have given a fully non-allegorical account of language. But Marcus is arguing against “historicism” only to the extent that it “den[ies] to human beings… even [the capacity to] grasp the idea of transcendent truth or wisdom in any timeless sense” (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Voegelin and Giambattista Vico: a Rhetorical Reading by Giuseppe
    Eric Voegelin and Giambattista Vico: A Rhetorical Reading by Giuseppe Ballacci Department of Political Science and International Relations Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Prepared for delivery at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30th-September 2nd, 2007 Eric Voegelin Society DRAFT, PLEASE NOT QUOTE WITHOUT PERMISSION “It is difficult to tell the truth, because even if there is just one truth, it is alive and so it has a changing face” (Franz Kafka)∗ Introduction It is not so easy to understand, but indeed very appealing to research, the reasons why in a moment so interested in foundations and language as ours, thinkers as Giambattista Vico and Eric Voegelin, who left such profound and inspiring contributions on these topics, are not at the centre of the attention of scholars in the field of philosophy, and specifically of political philosophy (the discipline that should be most concerned with them). This paper is an attempt to contribute to the (to be sure, already sustained) effort to correct this deficiency, with a reflection on the works of these two great authors aimed to highlight their communalities and the potentiality that springs from such joined reading. Since the times of Plato and Aristotle, Modernity can be considered not only one of the most interested epoch in the theme of foundations but also, and above all, one of the most confident in its ability to find them1. In this respect, we can recall what Blumenberg once noticed: it is not very normal that an epoch put in question the legitimacy of its existence, or even more, that it comes to conceive itself as an “epoch” at all2.
    [Show full text]