9783110684827.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought Veröffentlichungen des Grabmann-Institutes zur Erforschung der mittelalterlichen Theologie und Philosophie Münchener Universitätsschriften Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät Founded by Michael Schmaus †, Werner Dettloff † and Richard Heinzmann Continued in collaboration with Ulrich Horst Edited by Isabelle Mandrella and Martin Thurner Volume 67 The Legacy of Early Franciscan Thought Edited by Lydia Schumacher ISBN 978-3-11-068241-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-068482-7 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-068488-9 ISSN 0580-2091 DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110684827 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Control Number: 2020944940 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Lydia Schumacher, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Contents Acknowledgements IX LydiaSchumacher and Simon Maria Kopf AGuide to Citing the Summa Halensis XI Abbreviations XIII LydiaSchumacher Introduction 1 Part I: Philosophy and Theology Cecilia Trifogli The Creation of Matterinthe Summa Halensis 15 MagdalenaBieniak The Soul-Body Union in the Summa Halensis 37 Anna-KatharinaStrohschneider The Summa Halensis on Theologyand the Sciences: The Influence of Aristotle and Avicenna 49 TizianaSuarez-Nani On Divine Immensity and Infinity in Relation to Spaceand Time: The Crossroad of the Summa Halensis 71 Simon MariaKopf Providence in the Summa Halensis: Between Authority and Innovation 89 Oleg Bychkov Suspended Beauty? The MysteryofAesthetic Experience in the Summa Halensis 111 LydiaSchumacher Free Willinthe Summa Halensis 129 Nathalie Gorochov Odo Rigaldus at the University of Paris(c.1220 –48) 151 VI Contents Alexander Fidora The Talmud in the Summa Halensis 169 Part II: The Legacy of the Summa Halensis Jacob W. Wood It’sNot Just about Anselm: Aquinas’ ST Ia, q. 2, ar.1and Early Franciscan Illumination Theory 185 Theo Kobusch The Possible and the Impossible: Potentia absoluta and potentia ordinata Under Close Scrutiny 207 RichardCross The Metaphysics of the Incarnation in the Summa Halensis and its Place in the Later HistoryofChristology 221 Andrew V. Rosato The Passions of the Willand the PassionofChrist in Franciscan Theology from the Summa Halensis to DunsScotus 239 MaryBeth Ingham, CSJ Franciscan Identity, Poverty and the Rational Will: From Summa Halensis to John DunsScotus 257 Volker Leppin What is Later Franciscan Theology? Ockham and the Early Franciscans 281 José Meirinhos Intellectus agens triplex distinguitur: Early Franciscansand AvicennainPetrus Hispanus’ Theoryofthe Agent Intellect in the Scientialibri de anima 297 William J. Short, OFM Alexander of Hales in the Book of Conformities of Bartholomew of Pisa 323 William J. Courtenay Gabriel Biel and the Summa Halensis 339 Riccardo Saccenti The Reception of the Summa Halensis in the Manuscript Tradition until 1450 353 Contents VII Oliver Davies Science, Philosophy andthe Authority of the Early Franciscan Summa Halensis: Learning from the Past for the Sakeofthe Future 373 Contributor Biographies 399 Index 405 Acknowledgements This volume contains some of the proceedingsfrom aseries of conferences held in 2019 and 2020,inOxford and London, which receivedfunding from the European ResearchCouncil(ERC) under the European Union’sHorizon 2020 research and in- novation programme (grant agreement714427: ‘Authority and Innovation in Early Franciscan Thought’). Although my primaryinstitutional debt is to the ERC, Iwish to express my thanks first and foremost to the colleagues who contributed to this vol- ume, some of whom are specialists in later Franciscan thought or in other aspects of scholasticism, who werewilling to sacrifice precious research time to engageinthe experiment of investigatinglinks to the Summa Halensis,which was atext familiar to some but new to others. The contributors have done aremarkable service to me and to our research team, and Ibelieve, to scholarship in general, in testing ahypothesis concerning thoselinks which, thanks to their expertise and intellectual generosity, turned out to have more weight thanIoriginallyanticipated. Ihavebeen grateful for the opportunity to gettoknow not onlycontributors to the volumes but also the postdoctoral scholars workingonthe project in this phase, Simon Kopf, Riccardo Saccenti, Anna-Katharina Strohschneider,and Mark Thakkar, each of whom is not onlyabrilliant and accomplished scholarintheir own right but also an enthusiastic and committed contributor to the project and simply alot of fun to work with and a pleasure to know.Aswedrew this volume togetherfor publication, Ihad the tremen- douslygood fortune of finding Frazer MacDiarmid, Clarendon Doctoral Scholar in theologyatOxford, as aresearch assistant on the project,and the work could not have been placed in better hands. It is thanks to Frazer that the volume exists in the impeccablycopy-edited format that it does today – and to me that anyerrors of anykind remain. OpenAccess. ©2021,published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110684827-001 Lydia Schumacher and Simon Maria Kopf AGuide to Citingthe Summa Halensis When citing the Quaracchi edition of the Franciscan Fathers, we suggest and use in this volume the following form as astandardized wayofciting the Summa Halensis: Alexander of Hales, Doctoris irrefragabilis Alexandri de Hales Ordinis minorum Summa theologica (SH), 4vols(Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae,1924–48), III, In2, Tr2, S2, Q1, Ti1, C7, Ar3, Pr1, Pa2(n. 162), Solutio, p. 179. The relevant text divisions of the Quaracchiedition include, in the following order: VolVolume (tomus) PPart(pars) In Inquiry(inquisitio) Tr Tract (tractatus) SSection (sectio) QQuestion (quaestio) Ti Title (titulus) DDistinction (distinctio) MMember (membrum) CChapter(caput) Ar Article (articulus) Pr Problem (problema) Pa Particle (particula) (n[n].) Paragraph number[s] Afurther specification of the thus determined entity (to be cited as giveninthe edi- tion) might,atthis point,include: [arg.] Objections Respondeo/Solutio Answer (Sed) ContraOnthe Contrary Ad obiectaAnswerstoObjections p[p]. page number[s]. The second instance of citation should read as follows (includingall relevant text di- visions): SH III, In2, Tr2, S2, Q1, Ti1, C7,Ar3, Pr1, Pa2 (n. 162), Solutio, p. 179. Note thataccordingtoour proposal the number after SH indicatesthe volume num- ber (tomus)ofthe Quaracchi edition – and not the book (liber)ofthe Summa Halen- sis. Hence SH Irefers to Book 1, SH II to Book 2.1, SH III to Book 2.2, and SH IV to OpenAccess. ©2021 Lydia Schumacher and Simon Maria Kopf, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110684827-002 XII Lydia Schumacherand Simon Maria Kopf Book 3, respectively.The unedited Book 4, which is not part of the Quaracchi edition, will be cited, with referencetothe respective edition, as SH Bk IV. Where it would not lead to confusion, ashorthand could be used for furtherci- tations: SH III (n. 162), p. 179. Please note that all translations of the Summa Halensis and other textsbelong to the author,unless otherwise noted. Abbreviations AF AnalectaFranciscana Ar/ar.article (articulus) BFr Bullarium Franciscanum Bk./bk. book (liber) C/c./ch. chapter (caput) CCSL Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina (1953–) CSEL Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum(1866–) D/d. distinction (distinctio) De cons. phil. Boethius, De consolatione philosophiae De corrept. et grat. Augustine, De correptione et gratia De fid. orth. John of Damascus, De fide orthodoxa De grat. et lib. arbit. BernardofClairvaux, De gratia et liberoarbitrio disp. disputation DN De Divinis Nominibus of Pseudo-Dionysius Glossa Alexander of Hales, Glossa in quatuorlibros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi In/in. inquiry(inquisitio) In Sent. Sentences commentary(Aquinas, Bonaventure,etc.) LCLLoeb Classical Library M/m. member (membrum) n[n]. paragraph number[s] P/pt. part (pars) Pa/pa. particular (particula) PL Patrologia Latina Pr/pr.problem (problema) Q/q. question (quaestio) QD Alexander of Hales, Quaestiones disputatae ‘antequamesset frater’ S/s. section (sectio) SC Sources Chrétiennes Sent. Sentences of Peter Lombard SH Summa Halensis Soph. Elen. Aristotle, De Sophisticis Elenchis (On Sophistical Refutations) ST Summa Theologiae of Thomas Aquinas STh Albertthe Great, SummaTheologica Ti/ti. title (titulus) Tr/tr. tract (tractatus) trans. translation Vol. volume(tomus) OpenAccess. ©2021,published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110684827-003 Lydia Schumacher Introduction Forthoseschooledinthe historiographyofthe Franciscan intellectual tradition, a volume on the legacyofearlyFranciscan thought,thatis, the work of the scholars who foundedthis tradition in the decades between around 1220–50,may seem un- usual in its focus. Certainly, the later Franciscan tradition, from John DunsScotus (1265/66 – 1308) onwards,enjoys asignificant legacy, which