DOCSLIB.ORG

MRP DEIS Volume 2: Chapters 9 Through 13 and Appendices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MRP DEIS Volume 2: Chapters 9 Through 13 and Appendices Analysis Topics: Natural Resources Special Status Species Special Status Species Affected Environment Special status species are plants and animals that are legally protected under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 or other regulations, and species that are considered sufficiently rare by the scientific community to qualify for such status. Additional federal regulations protect special status species, including the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934 (as amended), the Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. These are discussed in more detail in the paragraphs that follow. The California ESA, administered by the California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG], does not supersede the federal ESA, but operates in conjunction with it to provide additional protection to threatened and endangered species in California, as well as species that are not protected through federal regulations. In addition to threatened and endangered state-listed species, the CDFG maintains an informal list of plant and wildlife species of special concern because of population declines and restricted distributions, and/or because they are associated with habitats that are declining in California. The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) has also developed lists of plants of special concern in California. The National Park Service (NPS) makes every reasonable effort to conduct its actions in a manner consistent with relevant state laws and regulations, per NPS policy. Regulations and Policies Pertaining to Special Status Species Federal Laws and Regulations Endangered Species Act. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has jurisdiction over species formally listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA (16 USC 1531–1544). An endangered species is one that is considered in danger of becoming extinct throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A threatened species is one that is likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future. In addition to endangered and threatened species, which are legally protected under the ESA, there are lists of candidate species for which the USFWS currently has enough information to support a proposal for listing as threatened or endangered species. Section 7 of the ESA outlines procedures for federal interagency cooperation to conserve federally listed species and designated critical habitat. The NPS is required to consult with USFWS to ensure that they are not undertaking, funding, permitting, or authorizing actions likely to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species. This consultation may be either informal or formal consultation. Under a formal consultation, the USFWS issues a biological opinion. Section 9 of the ESA prohibits the “take” of federally listed species, which is broadly defined as “to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to engage in any such conduct.” The biological opinion generally describes some level of incidental take, and details reasonable and prudent measures that the action agency needs to implement to ensure that critical habitat is not destroyed or degraded and that a listed species is not jeopardized by the federal action. The USFWS has interpreted the definition of “harm” to include significant habitat modification. An activity may be defined as a take even if it is unintentional or accidental. Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS 9-449 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which was first enacted in 1918, implements a series of treaties between the United States and Great Britain (on behalf of Canada), Mexico, Japan, and Russia, which provide for international migratory bird protection and authorize the Secretary of the Interior to regulate the take of migratory birds. There is a list of bird species that are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The act makes it unlawful, except as allowed by regulations, “at any time, by any means, or in any manner, to pursue, take, or kill any migratory bird, or any part, nest, or egg of any such bird, included in the terms of conventions” with certain other countries (16 USC 703). This includes direct and indirect acts, although harassment and habitat modification are not included unless they result in the direct loss of birds, nests, or eggs. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668-668c) prohibits anyone, without a permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior, from “taking” bald eagles, including their parts, nests, or eggs. The act defines “take” as “pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest or disturb.” In addition to immediate impacts, this definition also covers impacts that result from human-induced alterations initiated around a previously used nest site during a time when eagles are not present, if, upon the eagle’s return, such alterations agitate or bother an eagle to a degree that interferes with or interrupts normal breeding, feeding, or sheltering habits, and causes injury, death or nest abandonment. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 USC 661–667e, March 10, 1934, as amended 1946, 1958, 1978, and 1995) requires federal agencies to consult with USFWS, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), and the CDFG before they undertake or approve projects that control or modify surface water. The consultation is intended to prevent the loss of or damage to fish and wildlife in connection with water projects and to develop and improve these resources. Compliance with this act is incorporated into a project’s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. Executive Order 13186—Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds. Executive Order (EO) 13186 directs executive departments and agencies to take certain actions to further implement the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. EO 13186 creates a more comprehensive strategy for the conservation of migratory birds by the federal government, and fulfills the government’s duty to lead in the protection of this international resource. EO 13186 also provides a specific framework for the federal government’s compliance with its treaty obligations to Canada, Mexico, Russia, and Japan and provides broad guidelines on conservation responsibilities and requires the development of more detailed guidance in memoranda of understanding. For example, EO 13186 aids in incorporating national planning for bird conservation into agency programs and provides the formal presidential guidance necessary for agencies to incorporate migratory bird conservation more fully into their programs. National Park Service Regulations and Policies. Servicewide NPS regulations and policies, including the NPS Organic Act of 1916, NPS Management Policies 2006 (NPS 2006), and the NPS Natural Resource Management Reference Manual 77, direct national parks to provide for the protection of park resources. The Organic Act directs national parks to conserve “wild life” unimpaired for future generations and is interpreted to mean that native animal and plant life is to be protected and perpetuated as part of a park unit’s natural ecosystem. 9-450 Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan / DEIS Analysis Topics: Natural Resources Special Status Species The NPS Management Policies 2006 state that the NPS “will maintain as parts of the natural ecosystems of parks all plants and animals native to park ecosystems.” The term “plants and animals” refers to all five of the commonly recognized kingdoms of living things and includes such groups as flowering plants, ferns, mosses, lichens, algae, fungi, bacteria, mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes, insects, worms, crustaceans, and microscopic plants or animals” (NPS 2006). The NPS will achieve this by: preserving and restoring the natural abundances, diversities, dynamics, distributions, habitats, and behaviors of native plant and animal populations and the communities and ecosystems in which they occur restoring native plant and animal populations in parks when they have been extirpated by past human-caused actions minimizing human impacts on native plants, animals, populations, communities, and ecosystems, and the processes that sustain them (NPS 2006) Section 4.1 of NPS Management Policies 2006 states that “natural resources will be managed to preserve fundamental physical and biological processes, as well as individual species, features, and plant and animal communities. The Service will not attempt to solely preserve individual species (except threatened or endangered species) or individual natural processes; rather, it will try to maintain all the components and processes of naturally evolving park ecosystems, including the natural abundance, diversity, and genetic and ecological integrity of the plant and animal species native to those ecosystems” (NPS 2006). According to section 8.2.2.1 of the NPS Management Policies 2006, “Superintendents will develop and implement visitor use management plans and take action, as appropriate, to ensure that recreational uses and activities in the park are consistent with its authorizing legislation or proclamation and do not cause unacceptable impacts on park resources or values” (NPS 2006). Overall, goal of the NPS is to minimize human impacts (including impacts on individual wildlife) and avoid significant effects from disturbance to the abundance,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species Assessment for Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas)
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR BOREAL TOAD (BUFO BOREAS BOREAS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 MATT MCGEE AND DOUG KEINATH 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3023 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] drawing by Summers Scholl prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming March 2004 McGee and Keinath – Bufo boreas boreas March 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General ............................................................................................................................................8 Spring-Summer ...............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Eastern Population of The
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Eastern Population of the Boreal Toad, Anaxyrus boreas boreas Prepared by the Western Colorado Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment (SSA) reports the results of the comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for the Eastern Population of the boreal toad (Anaxyrus boreas boreas) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and, therefore, extinction risk. The boreal toad is a subspecies of the western toad (Anaxyrus boreas, formerly Bufo boreas). The Eastern Population of the boreal toad occurs in southeastern Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, northern New Mexico, and most of Utah. This SSA Report is intended to provide the best available biological information to inform a 12-month finding and decision on whether or not the Eastern Population of boreal toad is warranted for listing under the Endangered Species Act (Act), and if so, whether and where to propose designating critical habitat. To evaluate the biological status of the boreal toad both currently and into the future, we assessed a range of conditions to allow us to consider the species’ resiliency, redundancy, and representation (together, the 3Rs). The boreal toad needs multiple resilient populations widely distributed across its range to maintain its persistence into the future and to avoid extinction. A number of factors influence whether boreal toad populations are considered resilient to stochastic events. These factors include (1) sufficient population size (abundance), (2) recruitment of toads into the population, as evidenced by the presence of all life stages at some point during the year, and (3) connectivity between breeding populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 198/Thursday, October 12, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Proposed Rules 60607 designation of critical habitat. We note appointment, during normal business data and comments are available for that emergency listing and designation hours at the above address. public inspection, by appointment, of critical habitat are not petitionable during normal business hours at the References Cited actions under the Act. Based on the above address. information presented in the petition, You may request a complete list of all FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the habitat loss and other threats to the references we cited, as well as others, Jason Davis or Maria Boroja at the species have been long-standing and from the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office ongoing for many years. There are no Office (see ADDRESSES section). (see ADDRESSES section above), or at imminent, devastating actions that Author: The primary author of this (916±414±6600. document is Catherine Hibbard, could result in the extinction of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: species. Therefore, we find that an Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office emergency situation does not exist. The (see ADDRESSES section). Background 12-month finding will address the issue Authority: The authority for this action is Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Endangered of critical habitat. the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Public Information Requested (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that the Dated: October 5, 2000. Service make a finding on whether a The Service hereby announces its Jamie Rappaport Clark, petition to list, delist, or reclassify a formal review of the species' status Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project Forest Pacific Southwest R5-TP-040 January Service Region 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project by: USDA Forest Service California Department of Fish and Wildlife National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Coordinators: Cathy Brown USDA Forest Service Amphibian Monitoring Team Leader Stanislaus National Forest Sonora, CA [email protected] Marc P. Hayes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Research Scientist Science Division, Habitat Program Olympia, WA Gregory A. Green Principal Ecologist Owl Ridge National Resource Consultants, Inc. Bothel, WA Diane C. Macfarlane USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Threatened Endangered and Sensitive Species Program Leader Vallejo, CA Amy J. Lind USDA Forest Service Tahoe and Plumas National Forests Hydroelectric Coordinator Nevada City, CA Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment Brown et al. R5-TP-040 January 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD WORKING GROUP MEMBERS The following may be the contact information at the time of team member involvement in the assessment. Becker, Dawne Davidson, Carlos Harvey, Jim Associate Biologist Director, Associate Professor Forest Fisheries Biologist California Department of Fish and Wildlife Environmental Studies Program Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest 407 West Line St., Room 8 College of Behavioral and Social Sciences USDA Forest Service Bishop, CA 93514 San Francisco State University 1200 Franklin Way (760) 872-1110 1600 Holloway Avenue Sparks, NV 89431 [email protected] San Francisco, CA 94132 (775) 355-5343 (415) 405-2127 [email protected] Boiano, Daniel [email protected] Aquatic Ecologist Holdeman, Steven J. Sequoia/Kings Canyon National Parks Easton, Maureen A.
    [Show full text]
  • (Anaxyrus (Formerly Bufo) Canorus) in the Sierra National Forest, California
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 47, No. 4, 555–564, 2013 Copyright 2013 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Movements and Habitat Use of Yosemite Toads (Anaxyrus (formerly Bufo) canorus) in the Sierra National Forest, California CHRISTINA T. LIANG USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, California 95618 USA; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT.—The Yosemite Toad (Anaxyrus (formerly Bufo) canorus) is a high-elevation species endemic to the central Sierra Nevada mountain range in California whose populations are in decline. There is limited information on their terrestrial movement and habitat use, which impairs our understanding of the ecology and habitat needs of this sensitive species. I present radio-tracking data collected from 35 adult toads in the Sierra National Forest during daylight hours in the late spring and summer of 2007–2009. Movements, microsite cover type, and terrestrial habitat are analyzed and interpreted with regard to life-history characteristics of A. canorus. Adult toads moved a mean distance of 270 m from aquatic breeding sites, and the maximum distance recorded was 1.26 km. Females moved significantly longer distances than did males and had a larger home range. Distance traveled was related to ordinal day as well as the interaction between day and sex. Adult A. canorus used terrestrial environments extensively and were found in the mixed-conifer forest in dry habitat. Burrows were the most commonly used cover type, but other protective cover such as logs, rocks, and tree stumps were also used. The locations occupied by adult toads in the terrestrial environment were structurally different than other surrounding areas; occupied sites had less canopy cover and fewer woody species than did unoccupied sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Yosemite Toad
    EXPERT INSIGHTS SAVING THE YOSEMITE TOAD HEALTHY ECOSYSTEMS DEPEND ON HEALTHY TOADS BY HEATHER McKENNY, AQUATIC ECOLOGIST itting quietly in the warm, springtime sun in one of Yosemite’s ABOVE A female Yosemite toad in its natural high- picturesque meadows, you may be fortunate enough to experience elevation aquatic habitat. the rare joy of hearing the Yosemite toad’s musical call. Visitors have described the toad’s call as a strikingly clear, high-pitched trill with its mellow notes being a “pleasing additionS to the chorus of bird songs just after the snow leaves”. In fact, the toad’s scientific name “canorus” means “tuneful” in Latin, referring to the male’s melodious call to attract mates during the early-spring breeding season. Hearing the Yosemite toad’s chorus was once a common pleasure for spring visitors to the High Sierra. Sadly, Yosemite’s meadows are much quieter today due to substantial population declines. Scientists estimate that we have lost between 47 percent and 79 percent of our Yosemite toad populations, and that the species no longer occurs in as much as a third of its historic range. Because of the declines, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service considers the species a candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Chytridiomycosis, a disease caused by the non-native amphibian chytrid fungus, rec- reational use such as pack stock grazing, climate change, and air pollution are among the factors implicated in the species decline. Scientific studies determining the importance of these and other threats are currently underway. The Yosemite toad, found only in the Sierra Nevada was a historically abundant species, occurring primarily in high- elevation wet meadows above 6,400 feet in elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Finding on a Docket ID No
    21920 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Proposed Rules (SI–7J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Chicago, IL 60604. Such deliveries are federal holidays. Fish and Wildlife Service only accepted during the docket’s • Greenup City Clerk’s Office, normal hours of operation, and special Greenup Municipal Building, 115 50 CFR Part 17 arrangements should be made for Cumberland Avenue, Greenup, IL deliveries of boxed information. The 62424, Phone: (217) 923–3401, Hours: normal business hours are Monday [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2012–0003; Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4500030113] through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 4:30 p.m. excluding federal holidays. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Instructions: Direct your comments to and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983– Gladys Beard, NPL Deletion Process Petition To List the Eastern or 0002. EPA’s policy is that all comments Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Southern Rocky Mountain Population received will be included in the public Agency (SR–6J), 77 West Jackson of the Boreal Toad as an Endangered docket without change and may be Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, (312) or Threatened Distinct Population made available online at http:// 886–7253, or [email protected]. Segment www.regulations.gov, including any SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the personal information provided, unless AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of the comment includes information Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Toad (Bufo Canorus) As Endangered Under the Federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) PETITION TO LIST THE YOSEMITE DIVERSITY AND PACIFIC RIVERS ) TOAD (BUFO CANORUS) AS AN COUNCIL ) ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ) ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ) Petitioners ) ____________________________ ) February 28, 2000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Center for Biological Diversity and Pacific Rivers Council formally request that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the Yosemite toad (Bufo canorus) as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 - 1544. These organizations also request that Yosemite toad critical habitat be designated concurrent with its listing. The petitioners are conservation organizations with an interest in protecting the Yosemite toad and all of earth’s remaining biodiversity. The Yosemite toad was historically abundant in the high country of the central Sierra Nevada, from Fresno to Alpine County. It has since declined precipitously. Recent surveys have found that the species has disappeared from a majority of its historic localities. What populations remain are scattered and consist of few breeding adults. Declines have been especially alarming in Yosemite National Park, where the toad was first discovered and after which it is named. Studies at Tioga Pass indicated wholesale population crashes, which may be indicative of less studied populations that appear to have disappeared elsewhere in the Sierra. Numerous factors have contributed to the species’ decline. Introduced fish, pesticides, ozone depletion, pathogens and cattle grazing have all been identified as factors impacting the species and its habitat. At this time, no single factor has been attributed as a primary cause of the toad's disappearance. This petition sets in motion a legal process in which the USFWS has 90 days to determine if the Yosemite toad may warrant listing under the ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of Lassen Volcanic National Park: an Assessment of Vegetation, Ecological Services, and Condition
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Wetlands of Lassen Volcanic National Park: An Assessment of Vegetation, Ecological Services, and Condition Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/KLMN/NRTR—2008/113 ON THE COVER A wetland in Lassen Volcanic National Park. Photograph by: Cheryl Bartlett Wetlands of Lassen Volcanic National Park: An Assessment of Vegetation, Ecological Services, and Condition Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/KLMN/NRTR—2008/113 Paul R. Adamus, PhD College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University 104 COAS Administrative Bldg Corvallis, OR 97331­5503 Cheryl L. Bartlett Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Oregon State University 2082 Cordley Hall Corvallis, OR 97331­2902 March 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer­reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer­reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Service Research Natural Areas
    28. Fern Canyon 28. Fern Canyon (Meier 1979) Location This established RNA is on the San Dimas Experimental Forest, within the Angeles National Forest. It is approximately 6 miles (10 km) N. of the city of Claremont. It occupies portions of seven sects. in T1N, R8W SBBM (34°12'N., 117°43'W.), USGS Mt. Baldy quad (fig. 58). Ecological subsection – San Gabriel Mountains (M261Bd). Target Elements Chamise Chaparral (Adenostoma fasciculatum) and Canyon Live Oak (Quercus chrysolepis) Distinctive Features Well-Monitored Site: The RNA is located within an experimental forest. There is a good record of the impact and extent of fires in the area dating back to 1914 (six major fires have occurred). This record extends to the relative Figure 58—Fern Canyon RNA volume of pre- and post-fire stream flow in the three subdrainages within the RNA. Stream flow has changed appreciably among the three drainages since a major fire in 1938. Low-Elevation Ponderosa Pine: Brown’s Flat, a shallow 80-acre (32-ha) bowl created by an ancient land slump, contains the lowest elevation stand of Pinus ponderosa in S. California (about 3900 ft, 1189 m). This relictual stand of 81 individuals is well-isolated from other ponderosa pine stands in the San Gabriel Mountains and strongly affected by air pollution. There is almost no recent reproduction. Chaparral: This extensive vegetation formation occurs as chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum) and Ceanothus-dominated types. It was extensively burned in 1975 and, thus, is vigorous (fig. 59). Oak Woodlands: The area covered by this vegetation is extensive and varied.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Season Wildflowers at Bridgeport
    Mid-Season Wildflowers at Bridgeport The common name in bold is likely the name most frequently used at Bridgeport. The blooming dates are merely guidelines; flowers may appear earlier and extend later. If the flower you are looking for is not here, refer to the Early and Late tables to see if the flower was placed there. The references used in compiling this table are listed on the last page. Many of the Native American uses were taken directly from the research paper by Vicki Macdonald. Name changes are in blue, in agreement with The Jepson Manual, Second Edition, 2012. Common Scientific Flower Date Family Native Type Interesting Facts Name Name Color Description Baby Stars Leptosiphon Mid Polemoniaceae Native Annual Red/ 2-6” tall with whorled, Grows in open grassy areas, foothill woodlands Bicolor pink hairy leaves topped by and chaparral in western North America. 3/12- Phlox Family Below a head of bracts with Previously 5/30 5,600’ one flower open at a A good plant to view with a magnifier. Stamens Linanthus time. The tiny pink 5- are attached in the throat. bicolor Mar. petal flower has a Leptosiphon means “narrow tube” which refers to to yellow throat and a the tube of the funnel-shaped flower. June very long tube below the spreading petals. Ceanothus or Ceanothus Mid Rhamaceae Native Shrub or White 3-9’ tall with stiff Grows in chaparral on sunny, dry, rocky slopes. Buck Brush, cuneatus small tree or pale branches. May be Found throughout California and in Oregon and Wedgeleaf var. cuneatus 3/11 Buckthorn Family Below blue to wider than tall.
    [Show full text]