DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 82/Tuesday, April 29, 2014/Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 82/Tuesday, April 29, 2014/Rules 24256 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Executive Summary management activities, notably livestock Why we need to publish a rule. Under grazing, and also the anticipated Fish and Wildlife Service the Endangered Species Act, a species hydrologic effects upon habitat from may warrant protection through listing climate change. We also find that the 50 CFR Part 17 if it is endangered or threatened Yosemite toad is likely to become [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2012–0100; throughout all or a significant portion of endangered through the direct effects of 4500030113] its range. Listing a species as an climate change impacting small remnant populations, likely compounded with RIN 1018–AZ21 endangered or threatened species can be only completed by issuing a rule. the cumulative effect of other threat Endangered and Threatened Wildlife This rule will finalize the listing of the factors (such as disease). and Plants; Endangered Species Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog (Rana Peer review and public comment. We Status for Sierra Nevada Yellow- sierrae) as an endangered species, the sought comments from independent Legged Frog and Northern Distinct northern DPS of the mountain yellow- specialists to ensure that our Population Segment of the Mountain legged frog (Rana muscosa) as an designations are based on scientifically Yellow-Legged Frog, and Threatened endangered species, and the Yosemite sound data, assumptions, and analyses. Species Status for Yosemite Toad toad (Anaxyrus canorus) as a threatened We invited these peer reviewers to species. comment on our listing proposal. We AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, The basis for our action. Under the also considered all comments and Interior. Endangered Species Act, we can information received during the ACTION: Final rule. determine that a species is an comment period. endangered or threatened species based SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Previous Federal Actions on any of five factors: (A) The present Wildlife Service (Service), determine Please refer to the proposed listing endangered species status under the or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) rule for the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), frog, the northern DPS of the mountain as amended, for the Sierra Nevada Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational yellow-legged frog, and the Yosemite yellow-legged frog and the northern toad (78 FR 24472, April 25, 2013) for distinct population segment (DPS) of the purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory a detailed description of previous mountain yellow-legged frog (mountain Federal actions concerning these yellow-legged frog populations that mechanisms; or (E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued species. occur north of the Tehachapi We will also be finalizing critical Mountains), and determine threatened existence. We have determined that both the habitat designations for the Sierra species status under the Act for the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog and Nevada yellow-legged frog, the northern Yosemite toad. The effect of this the northern DPS of the mountain DPS of the mountain yellow-legged, and regulation will be to add these species yellow-legged frog are presently in the Yosemite toad under the Act in the to the List of Endangered and danger of extinction throughout their near future. Threatened Wildlife. entire ranges, based on the immediacy, Summary of Biological Status and DATES: This rule becomes effective June severity, and scope of the threats to their 30, 2014. Threats for the Sierra Nevada Yellow- continued existence. These include Legged Frog and the Northern DPS of ADDRESSES: This final rule is available habitat degradation and fragmentation, the Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog on the Internet at http:// predation and disease, climate change, www.regulations.gov and at the inadequate regulatory protections, and Background Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office. the interaction of these various stressors Please refer to the proposed listing Comments and materials we received, as impacting small remnant populations. A rule for the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged well as supporting documentation used rangewide reduction in abundance and frog and the northern DPS of the in preparing this rule, are available for geographic extent of surviving mountain yellow-legged frog under the public inspection at http:// populations of frogs has occurred Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) for www.regulations.gov. All of the following decades of fish stocking, additional species information. In the comments, materials, and habitat fragmentation, and most recently proposed rule, we described two documentation that we considered in a disease epidemic. Surviving separate species of yellow-legged frogs, this rulemaking are available by populations are smaller and more Rana sierrae and Rana muscosa, that appointment, during normal business isolated, and recruitment in diseased resulted from the recent taxonomic split hours at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, populations is much reduced relative to (see Taxonomy section below) of the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, historic norms. This combination of previously known Rana muscosa, 2800 Cottage Way, Room W–2605, population stressors makes persistence which we referred to in our proposed Sacramento, CA 95825; 916–414–6600 of these species precarious throughout rule as the mountain yellow-legged frog (telephone); 916–414–6712 (facsimile). the currently occupied range in the ‘‘species complex.’’ For clarity and in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sierra Nevada. order to maintain consistency with our Jennifer Norris, Field Supervisor, U.S. We have also determined that the previous treatment of the southern DPS Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Yosemite toad is likely to become of the mountain yellow legged frog in Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage endangered throughout its range within southern California (67 FR 44382, July Way, Room W–2605, Sacramento, CA the foreseeable future, based on the 2, 2002) as well as with our proposed 95825; 916–414–6600 (telephone); 916– immediacy, severity, and scope of the rule, and for the purposes of this 414–6712 (facsimile). Persons who use a threats to its continued existence. These document, we retain the common name telecommunications device for the deaf include habitat loss associated with of mountain yellow-legged frog for Rana (TDD) may call the Federal Information degradation of meadow hydrology muscosa, as opposed to the new Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. following stream incision consequent to common name, southern mountain SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the cumulative effects of historical land yellow-legged frog, as published by VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:54 Apr 28, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29APR3.SGM 29APR3 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 24257 Crother et al. (2008, p. 11). We also note east slope of the Sierra Nevada south Nevada yellow-legged frog, and we refer that the California Department of Fish into Inyo County at the southern extent to the Sierra Nevada populations of R. and Game (CDFG) was recently renamed of its range, and in the Glass Mountains muscosa as the northern DPS of the the California Department of Fish and just south of Mono Lake; and that R. mountain yellow-legged frog. In Wildlife (CDFW). We refer to the muscosa occurs in the southern portion California and Nevada, the Sierra California Department of Fish and of the Sierra Nevada within and south Nevada yellow-legged frogs occupy the Wildlife in all cases when discussing of the South Fork Kings River watershed western Sierra Nevada north of the the agency in the text. Where citations to the west of the Sierra Nevada crest Monarch Divide (in Fresno County) and are from CDFG documents, we include (along with those populations the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevada CDFW in parentheses for clarification. inhabiting southern California) (east of the crest) from Inyo County (Vredenburg et al. 2007, pp. 370–371). through Mono County (including the Taxonomy The Monarch Divide separates these Glass Mountains), to areas north of Lake Please refer to the proposed listing species in the western Sierra Nevada, Tahoe. The northern DPS of the rule for the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged while they are separated by the Cirque mountain yellow-legged frog occurs frog and the northern DPS of the Crest to the east (Knapp 2013, only in California in the western Sierra mountain yellow-legged frog under the unpaginated). Nevada and extends from south of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) for detailed For purposes of this rule, we Monarch Divide in Fresno County species information on taxonomy (78 FR recognize the species differentiation as through portions of the Kern River 24472, April 25, 2013). presented in Vredenburg et al. (2007, p. drainage. Figure 1 shows the Vredenburg et al. (2007, p. 371) 371) and adopted by the official approximate species boundaries within determined that Rana sierrae occurs in societies mentioned above (Crother et their historical ranges as determined by the Sierra Nevada north of the South al. 2008, p. 11), and in this final rule we Knapp (unpubl. data). Fork Kings River watershed, along the refer to Rana sierrae as the Sierra BILLING CODE 4310–55–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:54
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana Muscosa and Rana Sierrae) As Endangered Under the California Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION A Petition to List All Populations of the Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana muscosa and Rana sierrae) as Endangered under the California Endangered Species Act Photo © Todd Vogel CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, PETITIONER January 25, 2010 Petition to California Fish & Game Commission to List the Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog as Endangered Center for Biological Diversity January 25, 2010 Notice of Petition For action pursuant to Section 670.1, Title 14, California Code of Regulations (CCR) and Sections 2072 and 2073 of the Fish and Game Code relating to listing and delisting endangered and threatened species of plants and animals. I. SPECIES BEING PETITIONED: Common Name: mountain yellow-legged frog (southern mountain yellow-legged frog and Sierra Nevada mountain yellow-legged frog) Scientific Name: Rana muscosa and Rana sierrae II. RECOMMENDED ACTION: List as Endangered The Center for Biological Diversity submits this petition to list all populations of the mountain yellow-legged frog in California the as endangered throughout their range in California, under the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code §§ 2050 et seq., “CESA”). This petition demonstrates that the both the southern mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) and the Sierra Nevada mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae) clearly warrant listing under CESA based on the factors specified in the statute. III. AUTHOR OF PETITION: Name: Lisa Belenky, Senior Attorney, Center For Biological Diversity (with the assistance of Ellen Howard, B.A. EPO Biology, University of Colorado) Address: 351 California Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone: 415-436-9682 x 307 Fax: 415-436-9683 Email: [email protected] I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, all statements made in this petition are true and complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas)
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR BOREAL TOAD (BUFO BOREAS BOREAS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 MATT MCGEE AND DOUG KEINATH 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3023 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] drawing by Summers Scholl prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming March 2004 McGee and Keinath – Bufo boreas boreas March 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General ............................................................................................................................................8 Spring-Summer ...............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibiaweb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth
    AmphibiaWeb's Illustrated Amphibians of the Earth Created and Illustrated by the 2020-2021 AmphibiaWeb URAP Team: Alice Drozd, Arjun Mehta, Ash Reining, Kira Wiesinger, and Ann T. Chang This introduction to amphibians was written by University of California, Berkeley AmphibiaWeb Undergraduate Research Apprentices for people who love amphibians. Thank you to the many AmphibiaWeb apprentices over the last 21 years for their efforts. Edited by members of the AmphibiaWeb Steering Committee CC BY-NC-SA 2 Dedicated in loving memory of David B. Wake Founding Director of AmphibiaWeb (8 June 1936 - 29 April 2021) Dave Wake was a dedicated amphibian biologist who mentored and educated countless people. With the launch of AmphibiaWeb in 2000, Dave sought to bring the conservation science and basic fact-based biology of all amphibians to a single place where everyone could access the information freely. Until his last day, David remained a tirelessly dedicated scientist and ally of the amphibians of the world. 3 Table of Contents What are Amphibians? Their Characteristics ...................................................................................... 7 Orders of Amphibians.................................................................................... 7 Where are Amphibians? Where are Amphibians? ............................................................................... 9 What are Bioregions? ..................................................................................10 Conservation of Amphibians Why Save Amphibians? .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Eastern Population of The
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Eastern Population of the Boreal Toad, Anaxyrus boreas boreas Prepared by the Western Colorado Ecological Services Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment (SSA) reports the results of the comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for the Eastern Population of the boreal toad (Anaxyrus boreas boreas) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability and, therefore, extinction risk. The boreal toad is a subspecies of the western toad (Anaxyrus boreas, formerly Bufo boreas). The Eastern Population of the boreal toad occurs in southeastern Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, northern New Mexico, and most of Utah. This SSA Report is intended to provide the best available biological information to inform a 12-month finding and decision on whether or not the Eastern Population of boreal toad is warranted for listing under the Endangered Species Act (Act), and if so, whether and where to propose designating critical habitat. To evaluate the biological status of the boreal toad both currently and into the future, we assessed a range of conditions to allow us to consider the species’ resiliency, redundancy, and representation (together, the 3Rs). The boreal toad needs multiple resilient populations widely distributed across its range to maintain its persistence into the future and to avoid extinction. A number of factors influence whether boreal toad populations are considered resilient to stochastic events. These factors include (1) sufficient population size (abundance), (2) recruitment of toads into the population, as evidenced by the presence of all life stages at some point during the year, and (3) connectivity between breeding populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 198/Thursday, October 12, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 198 / Thursday, October 12, 2000 / Proposed Rules 60607 designation of critical habitat. We note appointment, during normal business data and comments are available for that emergency listing and designation hours at the above address. public inspection, by appointment, of critical habitat are not petitionable during normal business hours at the References Cited actions under the Act. Based on the above address. information presented in the petition, You may request a complete list of all FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the habitat loss and other threats to the references we cited, as well as others, Jason Davis or Maria Boroja at the species have been long-standing and from the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office ongoing for many years. There are no Office (see ADDRESSES section). (see ADDRESSES section above), or at imminent, devastating actions that Author: The primary author of this (916±414±6600. document is Catherine Hibbard, could result in the extinction of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: species. Therefore, we find that an Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office emergency situation does not exist. The (see ADDRESSES section). Background 12-month finding will address the issue Authority: The authority for this action is Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Endangered of critical habitat. the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Public Information Requested (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), requires that the Dated: October 5, 2000. Service make a finding on whether a The Service hereby announces its Jamie Rappaport Clark, petition to list, delist, or reclassify a formal review of the species' status Director, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment
    United States Department of Agriculture YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project Forest Pacific Southwest R5-TP-040 January Service Region 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT A Collaborative Inter-Agency Project by: USDA Forest Service California Department of Fish and Wildlife National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Coordinators: Cathy Brown USDA Forest Service Amphibian Monitoring Team Leader Stanislaus National Forest Sonora, CA [email protected] Marc P. Hayes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Research Scientist Science Division, Habitat Program Olympia, WA Gregory A. Green Principal Ecologist Owl Ridge National Resource Consultants, Inc. Bothel, WA Diane C. Macfarlane USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region Threatened Endangered and Sensitive Species Program Leader Vallejo, CA Amy J. Lind USDA Forest Service Tahoe and Plumas National Forests Hydroelectric Coordinator Nevada City, CA Yosemite Toad Conservation Assessment Brown et al. R5-TP-040 January 2015 YOSEMITE TOAD WORKING GROUP MEMBERS The following may be the contact information at the time of team member involvement in the assessment. Becker, Dawne Davidson, Carlos Harvey, Jim Associate Biologist Director, Associate Professor Forest Fisheries Biologist California Department of Fish and Wildlife Environmental Studies Program Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest 407 West Line St., Room 8 College of Behavioral and Social Sciences USDA Forest Service Bishop, CA 93514 San Francisco State University 1200 Franklin Way (760) 872-1110 1600 Holloway Avenue Sparks, NV 89431 [email protected] San Francisco, CA 94132 (775) 355-5343 (415) 405-2127 [email protected] Boiano, Daniel [email protected] Aquatic Ecologist Holdeman, Steven J. Sequoia/Kings Canyon National Parks Easton, Maureen A.
    [Show full text]
  • (Anaxyrus (Formerly Bufo) Canorus) in the Sierra National Forest, California
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 47, No. 4, 555–564, 2013 Copyright 2013 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Movements and Habitat Use of Yosemite Toads (Anaxyrus (formerly Bufo) canorus) in the Sierra National Forest, California CHRISTINA T. LIANG USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis, California 95618 USA; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT.—The Yosemite Toad (Anaxyrus (formerly Bufo) canorus) is a high-elevation species endemic to the central Sierra Nevada mountain range in California whose populations are in decline. There is limited information on their terrestrial movement and habitat use, which impairs our understanding of the ecology and habitat needs of this sensitive species. I present radio-tracking data collected from 35 adult toads in the Sierra National Forest during daylight hours in the late spring and summer of 2007–2009. Movements, microsite cover type, and terrestrial habitat are analyzed and interpreted with regard to life-history characteristics of A. canorus. Adult toads moved a mean distance of 270 m from aquatic breeding sites, and the maximum distance recorded was 1.26 km. Females moved significantly longer distances than did males and had a larger home range. Distance traveled was related to ordinal day as well as the interaction between day and sex. Adult A. canorus used terrestrial environments extensively and were found in the mixed-conifer forest in dry habitat. Burrows were the most commonly used cover type, but other protective cover such as logs, rocks, and tree stumps were also used. The locations occupied by adult toads in the terrestrial environment were structurally different than other surrounding areas; occupied sites had less canopy cover and fewer woody species than did unoccupied sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Yosemite Toad
    EXPERT INSIGHTS SAVING THE YOSEMITE TOAD HEALTHY ECOSYSTEMS DEPEND ON HEALTHY TOADS BY HEATHER McKENNY, AQUATIC ECOLOGIST itting quietly in the warm, springtime sun in one of Yosemite’s ABOVE A female Yosemite toad in its natural high- picturesque meadows, you may be fortunate enough to experience elevation aquatic habitat. the rare joy of hearing the Yosemite toad’s musical call. Visitors have described the toad’s call as a strikingly clear, high-pitched trill with its mellow notes being a “pleasing additionS to the chorus of bird songs just after the snow leaves”. In fact, the toad’s scientific name “canorus” means “tuneful” in Latin, referring to the male’s melodious call to attract mates during the early-spring breeding season. Hearing the Yosemite toad’s chorus was once a common pleasure for spring visitors to the High Sierra. Sadly, Yosemite’s meadows are much quieter today due to substantial population declines. Scientists estimate that we have lost between 47 percent and 79 percent of our Yosemite toad populations, and that the species no longer occurs in as much as a third of its historic range. Because of the declines, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service considers the species a candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Chytridiomycosis, a disease caused by the non-native amphibian chytrid fungus, rec- reational use such as pack stock grazing, climate change, and air pollution are among the factors implicated in the species decline. Scientific studies determining the importance of these and other threats are currently underway. The Yosemite toad, found only in the Sierra Nevada was a historically abundant species, occurring primarily in high- elevation wet meadows above 6,400 feet in elevation.
    [Show full text]
  • MRP DEIS Volume 2: Chapters 9 Through 13 and Appendices
    Analysis Topics: Natural Resources Special Status Species Special Status Species Affected Environment Special status species are plants and animals that are legally protected under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 or other regulations, and species that are considered sufficiently rare by the scientific community to qualify for such status. Additional federal regulations protect special status species, including the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934 (as amended), the Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. These are discussed in more detail in the paragraphs that follow. The California ESA, administered by the California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG], does not supersede the federal ESA, but operates in conjunction with it to provide additional protection to threatened and endangered species in California, as well as species that are not protected through federal regulations. In addition to threatened and endangered state-listed species, the CDFG maintains an informal list of plant and wildlife species of special concern because of population declines and restricted distributions, and/or because they are associated with habitats that are declining in California. The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) has also developed lists of plants of special concern in California. The National Park Service (NPS) makes every reasonable effort to conduct its actions in a manner consistent with relevant state laws and regulations, per NPS policy. Regulations and Policies Pertaining to Special Status Species Federal Laws and Regulations Endangered Species Act. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has jurisdiction over species formally listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA (16 USC 1531–1544).
    [Show full text]
  • Finding on a Docket ID No
    21920 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 71 / Thursday, April 12, 2012 / Proposed Rules (SI–7J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Chicago, IL 60604. Such deliveries are federal holidays. Fish and Wildlife Service only accepted during the docket’s • Greenup City Clerk’s Office, normal hours of operation, and special Greenup Municipal Building, 115 50 CFR Part 17 arrangements should be made for Cumberland Avenue, Greenup, IL deliveries of boxed information. The 62424, Phone: (217) 923–3401, Hours: normal business hours are Monday [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2012–0003; Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4500030113] through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 4:30 p.m. excluding federal holidays. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Instructions: Direct your comments to and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–SFUND–1983– Gladys Beard, NPL Deletion Process Petition To List the Eastern or 0002. EPA’s policy is that all comments Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Southern Rocky Mountain Population received will be included in the public Agency (SR–6J), 77 West Jackson of the Boreal Toad as an Endangered docket without change and may be Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, (312) or Threatened Distinct Population made available online at http:// 886–7253, or [email protected]. Segment www.regulations.gov, including any SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the personal information provided, unless AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of the comment includes information Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Toad (Bufo Canorus) As Endangered Under the Federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) PETITION TO LIST THE YOSEMITE DIVERSITY AND PACIFIC RIVERS ) TOAD (BUFO CANORUS) AS AN COUNCIL ) ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ) ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ) Petitioners ) ____________________________ ) February 28, 2000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Center for Biological Diversity and Pacific Rivers Council formally request that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the Yosemite toad (Bufo canorus) as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1531 - 1544. These organizations also request that Yosemite toad critical habitat be designated concurrent with its listing. The petitioners are conservation organizations with an interest in protecting the Yosemite toad and all of earth’s remaining biodiversity. The Yosemite toad was historically abundant in the high country of the central Sierra Nevada, from Fresno to Alpine County. It has since declined precipitously. Recent surveys have found that the species has disappeared from a majority of its historic localities. What populations remain are scattered and consist of few breeding adults. Declines have been especially alarming in Yosemite National Park, where the toad was first discovered and after which it is named. Studies at Tioga Pass indicated wholesale population crashes, which may be indicative of less studied populations that appear to have disappeared elsewhere in the Sierra. Numerous factors have contributed to the species’ decline. Introduced fish, pesticides, ozone depletion, pathogens and cattle grazing have all been identified as factors impacting the species and its habitat. At this time, no single factor has been attributed as a primary cause of the toad's disappearance. This petition sets in motion a legal process in which the USFWS has 90 days to determine if the Yosemite toad may warrant listing under the ESA.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 237/Tuesday, December
    75834 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2002 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR petitions for which a requested action is analysis of a segment of mitochondrial found to be warranted but precluded DNA from 372 Yosemite toads found in Fish and Wildlife Service should be treated as though resubmitted Yosemite and Kings Canyon National on the date of such finding, i.e., Parks. Their data showed significant 50 CFR Part 17 requiring a subsequent finding to be genetic differences in Yosemite toads made within 12 months. Such 12-month between the two National Parks. They Endangered and Threatened Wildlife findings are to be published promptly in also found significant genetic variability and Plants; 12-Month Finding for a the Federal Register. within Yosemite National Park between Petition to List the Yosemite Toad Section 4(b) of the Act states that we drainages, and within both Parks AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, may make warranted but precluded between breeding sites. Their data also Interior. findings only if we can demonstrate indicated that black toads are a that: (1) An immediate proposed rule is ACTION: Notice of 12-month petition subgroup within Yosemite toads rather precluded by other pending actions, and finding. than a separate species. Stephens (2001) (2) expeditious progress is being made examined mitochondrial DNA from 8 SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and on other listing actions. Due to the large Yosemite toads (selected from the Wildlife Service (Service), announce a amount of litigation over critical habitat, samples examined by Shaffer et al. 12-month finding for a petition to list we are working on numerous court (2000) to represent the range of the Yosemite toad (Bufo canorus) under orders and settlement agreements.
    [Show full text]