DOCSLIB.ORG

Language Acquisition Core Readings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Language Acquisition Core Readings Paul Bloom The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts Second printing, 1996 First MIT Press edition, 1994 © 1993 Harvester Wheatsheaf All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging­in ­Publication Data Language acquisition : core readings / edited by Paul Bloom. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p.). ISBN 0­262­02372­5.—ISBN 0­262­52187­3 (pbk.) 1. Language acquisition. I. Bloom, Paul. 1963– P118.L2536 1994 401'.93—dc20 93­27417 CIP Page v Contents Acknowledgments vii Preface: Language acquisitions 1 Paul Bloom Overview: Controversies in language acquisition 5 Paul Bloom Part 1: The onset of language development 49 1.1 Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective 51 Anne Fernald 1.2 Modularity and constraints in early lexical acquisition: Evidence from children's early language and gesture 95 Laura Ann Petitto Part 2: Word learning 127 2.1 Infant contributions to the achievement of joint reference 129 Dare A. Baldwin 2.2 Constraints children place on word meanings 154 Ellen M. Markman 2.3 The structural sources of verb meanings 174 Lila Gleitman Page vi 2.4 Early word meanings: The case of object names 222 Janellen Huttenlocher and Patricia Smiley Part 3: Syntax and semantics 249 3.1 The notion of source in language acquisition 251 Eve V. Clark and Kathie L. Carpenter 3.2 Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure 285 Jess Gropen, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander and Richard Goldberg 3.3 Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play? 329 Melissa Bowerman 3.4 Language acquisition in the absence of experience 364 Stephen Crain 3.5 Language growth with experience without feedback 411 Richard F. Cromer Part 4: Morphology 421 4.1 On learning the past tenses of English verbs 423 D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland 4.2 Rules of language 472 Steven Pinker 4.3 Level­ordering in lexical development 485 Peter Gordon Part 5: Acquisition in special circumstances 505 5.1 Beyond the input given: The child's role in the acquisition of language 507 Susan Goldin­Meadow and Carolyn Mylander 5.2 Maturational constraints on language learning 543 Elissa L. Newport Part 6: Alternative perspectives 561 6.1 Innate constraints and developmental change 563 Annette Karmiloff­Smith 6.2 The instinct to learn 591 Peter Marler Index 618 Page vii Acknowledgments The editor and publisher acknowledge with thanks permission granted to reproduce in this volume the following material previously published elsewhere. Every effort has been made to trace copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to make the necessary arrangement at the first opportunity. Overview Bloom, P. "Language development," in Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 1993, copyright © 1993 Academic Press Inc., reprinted by permission of Academic Press and the author. Part 1: The Onset of Language Development Fernald, A. "Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective," in Barkow et al., The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, 1992, copyright © 1992 Oxford University Press, reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press. Page viii Petitto, L. A. "Modularity and constraints in early lexical acquisition: Evidence from children's early language and gesture," in Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 25, copyright © 1992 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, reprinted by permission of Lawrence Erlbaum Associates and the author. Part 2: Word Learning Baldwin, D. A. "Infant contributions to the achievement of joint reference," in Child Development, 62, 1991, copyright © 1991 the Society for Research in Child Development, reprinted by permission of the Society for Research in Child Development. Markman, E. "Constraints children place on word meanings," in Cognitive Science, 14, 1990, copyright © 1990 Ellen M. Markman, reprinted by permission of the author. Gleitman, L. R. "The structural sources of verb meanings," in Language Acquisition, 1, 1, copyright © 1990 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, reprinted by permission of Lawrence Erlbaum Associates and the author. Huttenlocher, J. and Smiley, P. "Early word meanings: The case of object names," in Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1987, copyright © 1987 Academic Press Inc., reprinted by permission of Academic Press and the authors. Part 3: Syntax and Semantics Clark, E. V. and Carpenter, K. L. "The notion of source in language acquisition," in Language, 65, 1, 1989, copyright © 1989 the Linguistic Society of America, reprinted by permission of the Linguistic Society of America and the authors. Gropen, J. et al. "Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure," in Cognition, 41, 1991, copyright © 1991 Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., reprinted by permission of Elsevier Science Publishers and the authors. Bowerman, M. "Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play?," in Schiefelbusch, R. L. and Rice, M. L., eds. The Teachability of Language, copyright © 1989 Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., reprinted by permission of Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., the author, and the editors. Crain, S. "Language acquisition in the absence of experience," in Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 14, 1991, copyright © 1991 Cambridge University Press, reprinted by permission of Cambridge University Press and the author. Page ix Cromer, R. "Language growth with experience without feedback," in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 3, 1987, copyright © 1987 Plenum Publishing Corporation, reprinted by permission of Plenum Publishing Corporation. Part 4: Morphology Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. "On learning the past tenses of English verbs," in Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 2, 1986, copyright © 1986 The MIT Press, reprinted by permission of The MIT Press. Pinker, S. "Rules of language," in Science, 253, 530–5, 2 August 1991, copyright © 1991 the American Association for the Advancement of Science, reprinted by permission of the A.A.A.S. and the author. Gordon, P. "Level­ordering in lexical development," in Cognition, 21, 1985, copyright © 1985 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., reprinted by permission of Elsevier Science Publishers and the author. Part 5: Acquisition in Special Circumstances Goldin­Meadow, S. and Mylander, C. "Beyond the input given: The child's role in the acquisition of language," in Language, 66, 2, 1990, copyright © 1990 the Linguistic Society of America, reprinted by permission of the Linguistic Society of America and the authors. Newport, E. L. "Maturational constraints on language learning," in Cognitive Science, 14, 1990, copyright © 1990 Elissa L. Newport, reprinted by permission of the author. Part 6: Alternative Perspectives Karmiloff­Smith, A. "Innate constraints and developmental change," copyright © 1993 Annette Karmiloff­Smith, adapted from Carey, S. and Gelman, R., eds, The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on biology and cognition, 1991, adapted by permission of Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Marler, P. "The instinct to learn," in Carey, S. and Gelman, R., eds, The Epigenesis of Mind: Essays on biology and cognition, 1991, copyright © 1991 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, reprinted by permission of Lawrence Erlbaum Associates and the author. Page 1 Preface: Language Acquisitions Paul Bloom Language acquisition is one of the most important domains within the sciences of the mind, but it does not constitute a coherent field of study. Each aspect of language has unique properties, and it is unlikely that a single theory could capture the entire learning process. The psychological mechanisms that allow children to acquire the meanings of words, for instance, are almost certainly distinct from those that underlie their capacity to form and understand questions, or to establish narrative structure in story­telling. As such, there is no single process that one could call "language acquisition"; instead, we are left with the task of explaining different acquisitions (of word meaning, syntactic structure, morphological rules, and so on), and exploring the relationships that hold between them, if any. Why study these acquisitions? One motivation is an interest in the learning process itself. Even assuming that children innately possess a substantial base of linguistic knowledge, there exists considerable variation across languages. A child acquiring English, for instance, has to figure out what "dog" means, what the past tense of "go" is, and how to order nouns and adjectives. These are the acquisitions that any adequate theory must account for, and explaining how all normal children come to possess such knowledge on the basis of limited input poses puzzles of extraordinary intellectual depth. But there are other reasons for studying language acquisition. Scholars from Aristotle to Wittgenstein have used the process of a child acquiring her first language as a way to explore broader questions about the nature of grammar, thought, and meaning. Philosophers turn to the logical problem of lexical Page 2 acquisition when debating the nature of word meaning, linguists use the study of language acquisition
Recommended publications
  • US 1.Fm.Ipl.EA2530 ID=43005

    US 1.Fm.Ipl.EA2530 ID=43005

    Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY JAHRBUCH 2003/ 2004 HERAUSGEGEBEN VON DIETER GRIMM MIT BERICHTEN UND BEITRÄGEN VON Gil Anidjar ◆ Patrick Bahners ◆ Ken Cheng ◆ Zhiyuan Cui ◆ Stephan Epstein Egon Flaig ◆ Pascal Grosse ◆ Rossitza Guentcheva ◆ Luca Giuliani Stephen Greenblatt ◆ Peter A. Hall ◆ Ulrich Herbert ◆ Christoph Horn James H. Hunt ◆ Janellen Huttenlocher ◆ Susan James ◆ Bernhard Jussen Ousmane Kane ◆ Daniela Koleva ◆ Isidor Levin ◆ Jacques Lévy ◆ Stefan Litwin Sandra D. Mitchell ◆ Ashis Nandy ◆ Helga Nowotny ◆ Pál Nyíri ◆ Heike Paul Dominique Pestre ◆ Robert Pippin ◆ David Poeppel ◆ Christof Rapp Amnon Raz-Krakotzkin ◆ Klaus Reichert ◆ John J. Rieser ◆ Beate Rössler Cosima Rughinis¸ ◆ Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann ◆ Helmuth Schulze-Fielitz Sara J. Shettleworth ◆ Quentin Skinner ◆ Ramie Targoff ◆ Christo Todorov Hans-Heinrich Trute ◆ Jacques Waardenburg ◆ Rudolph Wagner ◆ ◆ ◆ Herman Vanˆ der Wee Hans-Ulrich Wehler Jörg Widmann Stefan Wild Ines G.Z upanov Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY JAHRBUCH 2003/ 2004 © 2005 by Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin – Institute for Advanced Study Berlin – Alle Rechte, auch das der fotomechanischen Wiedergabe, vorbehalten Redaktion: Angelika Leuchter Gesamtherstellung: Buch- und Offsetdruckerei H. Heenemann, Berlin Printed in Germany 2005 ISBN 3-934045-06-5 ISSN 0724-326-X INHALTSVERZEICHNIS 11 . VORWORT DES HERAUSGEBERS ARBEITSBERICHTE 14 . HATE GIL ANIDJAR 17 . DER HISTORISCHE AUGENBLICK PATRICK BAHNERS 23 . INTEGRATING WORK AND LIFE AT WIKO: POW-WOWS, LESESTUNDEN, POTLUCKS KEN CHENG 27 . AN IMPORTANT TRANSITION PERIOD IN MY LIFE ZHIYUAN CUI 29 . A NEW BENCHMARK FOR THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STEPHAN EPSTEIN 34 . PARAPHYSIK DES SPRINGENS: PRAKTISCHE ÜBUNGEN EGON FLAIG 38 . ERKUNDUNGEN PASCAL GROSSE 41 . MOBILITY AND ART ROSSITZA GUENTCHEVA inhaltsverzeichnis 5 45 . ADJUSTMENT PATHS PETER A.
  • Further Evidence for the Developmental Stages of Language Learning and Processability

    Further Evidence for the Developmental Stages of Language Learning and Processability

    US-China Education Review A 9 (2012) 813-825 D Earlier title: US-China Education Review, ISSN 1548-6613 DAVID PUBLISHING Further Evidence for the Developmental Stages of Language Learning and Processability Evelyn Doman Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; University of Macau, Macau, China Few, if any, researchers would deny the existence of the developmental stages of language learning. However, there are questions about the applicability and the importance of the stages in pedagogy. Up to this point, these questions regarding the ESL (English as a second language) stages have never been addressed in a Japanese post-secondary educational context. This study is the only one of its kind to measure the developmental stages of a group of Japanese university students and to provide the learners with intensive instruction to see how much/if any changes are made to their interlanguage due to the instruction. As predicted by Pienemann’s Teachability Hypothesis (1992), only the learners who had met the prerequisites for instruction could acquire the grammatical points which were instructed. The results of this study point to the need among TESOL (Teaching English as a Second or Other Language) instructors to teach students only slightly above their current language levels. Keywords: developmental stages, Teachability Theory, grammar, SLA (second language acquisition) Introduction Developmental Stages of Second Language SLA (second language acquisition) research suggests overwhelmingly that language learning is a developmental process, which cannot be consciously controlled or predicted by teachers or learners (J. Willis & D. Willis, 2001, p. 179). There is a large amount of evidence supporting the notion that language learning for speakers of any language is systematic, irrespective of whether it is a first or second language (Pienemann, 1995, 1998; Heinsch, 1994; Doughty, 2003; Larsen-Freeman & Long, 1991).
  • A Linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of German As an L2

    A Linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of German As an L2

    i A Linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of German as an L2 A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors with Distinction by Nicholas D. Stoller (December 2006) Oxford, Ohio ii ABSTRACT A LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE ACQUISITION OF GERMAN AS AN L2 by Nicholas D. Stoller It is obvious that the setting of acquisition, the amount and type of input, and the motivation of learners play a large role in adult second language (L2) acquisition. Many of the theories of L2 acquisition unfortunately fail to adequately take these variables into account. This thesis gives an overview of the current and past theories, including evidence for and against each theory. This is supplemented by an error analysis of second year Miami University students to see if this can give support to any of the current theories. Once that is completed, I examine the relation between input and the possibility of a language learning device such as UG and then move on to pedagogical application of my findings. iii Contents Chapter Page 1 Introduction 1 2 2 The Basis of the Study of L2 Acquisition 2 3 Linguistic Theories of L2 Acquisition 7 3.1 Theories without UG 7 3.1.1 Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis 7 3.1.2 Markedness Difference Hypothesis 8 3.1.3 Fundamental Difference Hypothesis 9 3.1.4 Information Processing Approach 10 3.2 Theories with Partial UG 13 3.2.1 Transfer Hypothesis 13 3.2.2 Krashen’s Comprehension Hypothesis 14 3.3 Theories with Full UG use 19 3.3.1 Identity Hypothesis 19 3.3.2 Full Transfer/Full Access Hypothesis 20 3.4 Overview of the Theories 21 4 Error Analysis and Miami University 2nd 22 Year Students 4.1 Errors of Cases Following Verbs 23 4.2 Errors of Gender of Nouns 25 4.3 Errors of Verb Form 26 4.4 Errors of Umlaut Usage 29 5 Relation of UG and Input 30 6.1 Problems with Input in Classroom Instruction 33 6.2 Pedagogy and L2 Acquisition 35 7 Conclusion 40 Bibliography 42 iv 1 A Linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of German as an L2 1.
  • Child Linguistic Development

    Child Linguistic Development

    Linguistic Development Andrew Matthews 5th June 1996 1 CONTENTS 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Language Acquisition 4 2.1 Social Influences On Development . 6 3 History 7 3.1 Diary Studies: till 1930 . 7 3.2 Large Sample Studies: 1930 - 1957 . 7 3.3 Linguistic Studies: 1957 onwards . 7 4 What Is It That Develops? 8 4.1 The Communication Chain . 9 4.1.1 The Brain . 9 4.1.2 Neurological Encoding . 12 4.1.3 Anatomical-Physiological Encoding . 14 4.1.4 Auditory Reception . 15 5 Normal And Deviant Development 16 6 The Prelinguistic Period 17 7 The Holophrastic Period 19 8 The Telegraphic Period 20 9 The Complex Period 22 10 The Intuitive Linguistic Period 25 11 Developmental Theories 26 11.1 Baby Talk Register . 27 11.2 Social Theories Of Development . 30 12 Glossary 32 LIST OF TABLES 3 List of Tables 1 Consonantal divisions according to place of articulation . 14 2 Piaget's stages of cognitive development. ..................... 17 3 General stages of Linguistic development. ..................... 17 4 General stages of phonological development. ................... 18 5 Common categories of meaning (semantic relations) expressed in children's earliest sentences .................................... 21 6 Order of acquisition of English grammatical morphemes. 23 7 Progressive acquisition of the negation-transformation rules . 24 8 Examples of negative sentences showing the three developmental stages of negative sentences. ................................... 25 9 Expansion and Recasting { do they accelerate development? . 27 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1 Introduction This report is a general overview of current knowledge on linguistic development. It covers four main aspects of the subject. It begins by briefly covering the history of methodologies for studying development, with references to diary studies, large sample studies , and linguistic studies .
  • Two Multilinguality Portraits of Learners of Norwegian

    Two Multilinguality Portraits of Learners of Norwegian

    Reading in a Foreign Language April 2018, Volume 30, No. 1 ISSN 1539-0578 pp. 29–48 Multilinguals and extensive reading: Two multilinguality portraits of learners of Norwegian Anna M. Krulatz Norwegian University of Science and Technology Norway Jennifer Duggan Norwegian University of Science and Technology Norway Abstract This paper presents an exploratory-interpretive study of two multilingual adults acquiring Norwegian through extensive reading. The study examined social and cognitive aspects of language acquisition, and individual factors, such as the language learning behaviors, experiences, attitudes, and beliefs of the participants. The data were collected using background self-reports, diaries in which the participants recorded their extensive reading and related language learning experiences, and semi-structured interviews. To represent adult language learning from a multilingual perspective, the data were analyzed qualitatively using a priori themes derived from the ecological model of multilinguality (Aronin, 2016; Aronin & Ó Laoire, 2004; Aronin & Singleton, 2012). The findings suggest that environment, previous education, reasons for learning a language, and previous knowledge of other languages affect how multilingual learners approach language learning and how they use a new language. Keywords: multilingual learners, ecological model, diary study, individual learner differences, Norwegian, dominant language constellation The majority of studies on multilingual language acquisition and extensive reading to date have focused on quantifiable measures and benefits (e.g., Beglar & Hunt, 2014; Elley & Mangubhai, 1983; Nation, 2015; Pigada & Schmitt, 2006). However, qualitative data about individuals is also a valuable source of information (Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008). The present study explored the benefits of extensive reading to adult multilingual language learners, the researcher- diarists, with the goal of capturing their perspectives on their language learning behaviors, attitudes, and preferences related to extensive reading.
  • The Comparative Fallacy: an Analysis and Discussion of Selected Research

    The Comparative Fallacy: an Analysis and Discussion of Selected Research

    Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, No. 1 The Forum The Comparative Fallacy: An Analysis and Discussion of Selected Research Eun-Young Kwon INTRODUCTION Ever since the introduction of the “independent grammars assumption,” whereby a child is said to have its own grammar and not just an imitation of adult language, first language (L1) acquisition researchers such as Martin Braine (1963) and others have constructed grammars for children’s languages rather than treat them as defective adult grammars. This is based on the view that language learners create grammars of their own, rather than master the target grammar imperfectly. Thus, at any moment, a child’s grammar is an independent system. In second language acquisition (SLA) research this notion has led to several slightly variant conclusions. On the one hand, second language (L2) learners should be treated as already having a language of their own, not just as poor beginning learners of the target language, and should be encouraged to create a system from experience and internal resources rather than have the target language thrust down their throats by teachers (Johnson & Johnson, 1998). In reality, however, as Cook (1999) asserts, “SLA research has often fallen into the comparative fallacy (Bley- Vroman, 1983) of relating the L2 learner to the native speaker” (p. 189). In other words, the learner’s language is typically explained by reference to the target language system, rather than treated as an independent set of rules and performance characteristics. The aim of this paper is to examine two empirical studies in SLA from the perspective of the comparative fallacy: the studies of Dulay and Burt (1974) and Mendizabal (2001), both of which address L2 learners’ morpheme acquisition order.
  • Order of Acquisition: a Comparison of L1 and L2 English and Spanish

    Order of Acquisition: a Comparison of L1 and L2 English and Spanish

    Running head: ORDER OF ACQUISITION 1 Order of Acquisition A Comparison of L1 and L2 English and Spanish Morpheme Acquisition Kyle McFerren A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2015 ORDER OF ACQUISITION 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ Paul Müller, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Stephanie Blankenship, M.A. Committee Member ______________________________ Michael Babcock, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Brenda Ayres, Ph.D. Honors Director ______________________________ Date ORDER OF ACQUISITION 3 Abstract This paper examines the order of acquisition for grammatical morphemes in Spanish and English first and second language learners. Brown’s first morpheme order study, conducted in 1973, laid the foundation for what would become one of the most common types of study conducted within the field of second language acquisition. The four orders of acquisition relevant here are examined and compared in order to support the roles of salience, morphophonological regularity, complexity, input frequency, and native language transfer in first and/or second language acquisition. The conclusion is that these five determinants work interdependently in determining the difficulty of acquiring a particular morpheme in second language acquisition, and the same factors, except native language transfer, work together in first language acquisition as well, to varying degrees. ORDER OF ACQUISITION 4 Order of Acquisition A Comparison of L1 and L2 English and Spanish Morpheme Acquisition For decades, researchers have conducted morpheme order studies, also known as natural order studies, in hopes of gaining greater insight into how language learners (LLs) learn a language.
  • “I Can Speak German - Und Deutsch” the Development and Use of Code-Switching Among Simultaneous and Successive English-German Bilingual Children

    “I Can Speak German - Und Deutsch” the Development and Use of Code-Switching Among Simultaneous and Successive English-German Bilingual Children

    “I can speak German - und Deutsch” The Development and Use of Code-Switching among Simultaneous and Successive English-German Bilingual Children Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philologischen Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Br. vorgelegt von Esther Albrecht, geb. Liebner aus Hannover WS 2003/2004 Erstgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Brigitte Halford Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Bernd Kortmann Drittgutachter: Prof. Dr. Peter Auer Vorsitzende des Promotionsausschusses der Gemeinsamen Kommission der Philologischen, Philosophischen und Wirtschafts- und Verhaltenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät: Prof. Dr. Elisabeth Cheauré Datum der Fachprüfung im Promotionsfach: 09.07.2004 CONTENTS List of Figures vi List of Tables vii Acknowledgements ix O. INTRODUCTION 1 0.1 Introduction 1 0.2 Overview 3 1. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 6 1.1 Bilingual Language Acquisition 6 1.1.1 Bilingualism 6 1.1.1.1 Definition and research areas 6 1.1.1.2 Types 7 1.1.1.3 Degree 8 1.1.1.4 Factors influencing bilingualism 9 1.1.1.5 Bilingualism and Intelligence and Cognition 10 1.1.2 Becoming and Staying Bilingual 11 1.1.3 Language Acquisition 13 1.1.3.1 Bilingual First Language Acquisition 14 1.1.3.2 Successive Language Acquisition 15 1.1.3.3 One or Two Language Systems? 18 1.1.3.4 Language Input 21 1.2 Code-Switching 23 1.2.1 History to the Study of Code-Switching 24 1.2.2 Language Contact Phenomena 25 1.2.2.1 Code-Mixing and Code-Switching 25 1.2.2.2 Borrowing 27 1.2.2.3 Interference 28 1.2.3 Grammatical Aspects to the Study of Code-Switching 29
  • Journal of the Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, 1994. SPONS AGENCY Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, Inc

    Journal of the Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, 1994. SPONS AGENCY Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, Inc

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 386 019 FL 022 834 TITLE Journal of the Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, 1994. SPONS AGENCY Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, Inc. REPORT NO ISSN-0273-2459 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 444p. AVAILABLE FROM SALT Journal, Learning Forum, 1725 So. Hill St., Oceanside, CA, 92054. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT Journal of the Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching; v19 n1-4 1994 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC18 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Acceleration (Education); Cultural Influences; Learning Processes; *Neurolinguistics; Second Language Learning; *Semiotics; *Suggestopedia; Teacher Education; Technical Institutes; Two Year Colleges ABSTRACT Two issues of this serial include the following articles: "Editorial Note for Semiotics Issue" (Pedro Portes); "Qualitative Postmodernism and the Nature of Teaching and Learning" (Gary Shank); "Instructional Prescriptions Can Be Hazardous to Your Pedagogy!" (Donald J. Cunningham, Bruce Allen Knight, and Kathy K. Watson); "Toward a Mutual Interplay Between Psychology and Semiotics" (Alfred Lang); "Semiotics and the Deconstruction of Conceptual Learning" (J. L. Lemke); "Effectiveness of Accederated Learning as a Tool to Facilitate a Maintenance Paradigm Shift" (Aaron B. Clevenson); "The Effectiveness of Suggestive Accelerative Learning Techniques Applied in Teaching Underprepared College Freshmen at a Two-Year Technical School" (Vera Ann Confer-Owens); "Video-Taped Instrue.ion Creates Listening and Visual Memory Integration for Higher Reading and Math Scores"
  • BUCLD 44 Schedule and Abstracts | Conference on Language Development

    BUCLD 44 Schedule and Abstracts | Conference on Language Development

    11/7/2019 BUCLD 44 Schedule and Abstracts | Conference on Language Development Linguistics Conference on Language Development BUCLD 44 Schedule and Abstracts THE 44TH BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT NOVEMBER 7–10, 2019 GEORGE SHERMAN UNION, BOSTON UNIVERSITY Registration opens at 8:00am each day starting on Friday. Please note that this year’s Student Workshop will be held on Thursday, November 7th following the Society for Language Development Symposium at 6:30pm, with refreshments available starting at 6. Fri | Sat | Sun | Alternates | Fri posters | Sat posters Thursday, November 7, 2019 STUDENT WORKSHOP (East Balcony) 6:30 – 7:30 Careers in the Field of Communication Sciences and Disorders*: Why and How *also known as Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences. Sudha Arunachalam (New York University) Abstract(s) for presentation(s) above Careers in the Field of Communication Sciences and Disorders*: Why and How *also known as Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences Sudha Arunachalam (New York University) The field of communication disorders (sometimes called CSD; Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences; or clinical linguistics) is an interdisciplinary field that draws from linguistics, psychology, and neuroscience, as well as clinical approaches to language and communication disorders (speech-language pathology). Many of you probably already have research programs or research interests that would fit well in this field. In this session, we’ll talk about how your research might fit into such a department and about the academic career path. We’ll also talk about how to position yourself to be competitive on this track, considering all ranks from those just planning to go to graduate school through to postdocs currently on the job market.
  • Third Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Influence

    Third Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Influence

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Diposit Digital de Documents de la UAB Third Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Influence from L1 and L2 TFG Estudis Anglesos Supervisor: Montserrat Capdevila i Batet Javiera Paz Duhalde Solís June 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction .....................................................................................................2 2. Third Language Acquisition (TLA) .................................................................4 2.1. Towards a definition of TLA ............................................................4 2.2. Bilingualism vs. Multilingualism ......................................................6 2.3. Third Language Acquisition (TLA) vs. Second Language Acquisition (SLA)¼¼........................................................................... 7 2.4. Bilingualism versus Second Language Acquisition: two paths to the acquisition of an L3 .................................¼¼¼¼¼.............................8 3. Cross-Linguistic Influence (CLI) ...................................................................10 3.1. Typological distance ........................................................................11 3.2. L2 status ...........................................................................................15 4. Conclusion ......................................................................................................19
  • A Corpus Based Study in Morpheme Acquisition Order of Young Learners of English

    A Corpus Based Study in Morpheme Acquisition Order of Young Learners of English

    Report nr: 2012ht00268 Department of Education Degree Project in Educational Sciences within General Education Studies, 15 credits Fall 2012 A Corpus Based Study in Morpheme Acquisition Order of Young Learners of English A comparison of Swedish students in grade 6 and grade 7 Su Yin Khor Supervisor: Christine Johansson, Ph.D., Department of English. Examiner: David Kronlid, Ph.D., Department of Education. 2 ABSTRACT This study investigated the morpheme acquisition order of Swedish students in grades 6 and 7, utilizing corpus texts drawn from the Uppsala Learner English Corpus (ULEC). It is an extension of Khor (2012) that focused on students in grades 9 and 12. Previous studies on morpheme acquisition order suggested that there was a natural sequence in acquiring morphemes, regardless of first language (L1). First language influence was said to be minimal or non-existing. Recently, studies have found evidence that L1 transfer is greater than first thought. This study examined three morphemes; articles, the preposition in, and plural form. The results showed that the errors that both groups made were consistent with the errors that were found in Khor (2012). The errors were of the same nature in all age groups, mainly in differences in (1) generic and specific usage of articles in Swedish and English, (2) the generic sense of regular plural nouns, (3) plural form of irregular nouns and nouns of Latin or Greek origin, (4) plural forms of countable and misuse of uncountable nouns, and (5) the usage of prepositions in Swedish and English. Current studies have also generated these results, which points towards strong L1 influence.