DOCSLIB.ORG

“The Whiteness Project of Gentrification: the Battle Over Los

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“The Whiteness Project of Gentrification: the Battle Over Los University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2018 The Whiteness Project of Gentrification: The Battle vo er Los Angeles' Eastside Jaime Guzmán University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Ethnic Studies Commons, and the Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons Recommended Citation Guzmán, Jaime, "The Whiteness Project of Gentrification: The Battle over Los Angeles' Eastside" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1433. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1433 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE WHITENESS PROJECT OF GENTRIFICATION: THE BATTLE OVER LOS ANGELES’ EASTSIDE __________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Social Sciences University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________ by Jaime Guzmán June 2018 Advisor: Armond Towns ©Copyright by Jaime Guzmán 2018 All Rights Reserved Author: Jaime Guzmán Title: THE WHITENESS PROJECT OF GENTRIFICATION: THE BATTLE OVER LOS ANGELES’ EASTSIDE Advisor: Armond Towns Degree Date: June 2018 ABSTRACT For many years, the city of Los Angeles has declared war on communities of color. In the past decade, former communities of color like Echo Park, Silver Lake, and Highland Park have all been converted into predominantly white, affluent neighborhoods. In essence, working-class people of colors’ neighborhoods are being uplifted in order to welcome a much more affluent population to town. The newest target of Los Angeles’ gentrification for the past couple of years has been the greater Eastside. In this project I present my critical intervention of gentrification as a whiteness project. This critical intervention argues that gentrification should be understood as a revitalization process that redevelops a blighted neighborhood by effectively cleaning it of its bodies of color. As a critical intervention, gentrification as a whiteness project posits that the revitalization of neighborhoods of color must be understood as a process with both classist and racist implications. In short, this critical intervention argues that a racialization process undergirds the classist “take-over” of a neighborhood by a wealthier incoming population. In order to support the claim that gentrification should be considered a whiteness project I hope to consolidate three major threads of research that are currently unrecognized in dominant gentrification literature: (1) capitalism is a raced project in the U.S.; (2) displacement is not separate from gentrification; (3) and the locality of gentrification is connected to global systems. ii By employing critical and rhetorical methods, I explore gentrification by analyzing three points that contextualize urban communication: materiality, bodies, and movement. In this way, the goal was to understand how the city created new urban built environments for gentrification (Chapter 1), how artists and beneficiaries of a revitalized neighborhood used their bodies to (re)center their right to gentrify any neighborhood (Chapter 2), and finally, which movements were formed in order to counter these claims for gentrification (Chapter 3). Ultimately, by analyzing these three different sites of gentrification I aimed to map out a critical rhetorical cartography of L.A.’s gentrification in order to highlight the ways that power, subjectivity, and place-making are negotiated. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The best parts of this dissertation are a result of my wonderful committee: Christina Foust, Kate Willink, and Raúl Pérez. I would especially like to thank Armond Towns for being an awesome advisor and completely transforming how I view critical race scholarship. Also thanks to the people I met in Denver, especially: Ramona Beltran, Danny Olmos, Frank Tuitt, Johanna Leyba, Thomas Walker, Anthea Johnson Rooen, and Paula Martin; and to my friends: Xochilt, Sergio, Michael, Diana, Andres, Daelena, Sara, Tai, Claire, Misty, and Delma. Also thanks Deb Ortega for your mentorship and for colloquially saying what would become my hardest lesson: “Just because you’re brown doesn’t mean you’re down.” I would not have survived this doctorate program if I hadn’t met Raisa Alvarado Uchima or Kasey Uchima. Since day one of orientation you both welcomed me into your lives, embraced me as a friend and never let me go. Thank you Maritza Rios and Beverly Calero: your friendship has profoundly changed me for the better. This dissertation would not have been possible if it weren’t for all those countless nights we talked about this topic as we drove around East L.A., looked at the city skyline over the hills of El Sereno, all while blasting cumbias y norteñas. Also thanks to my CSULA family, especially, David Olsen, Ulises Moreno, Rob DeChaine, Tindage, Rob, Jenna, and Angelica for being an awesome editing friend. Most importantly, I am here because of my family. My rock throughout this entire journey has been my ama, my brother Adrian, y mi Ama Gela. Thank you to my extended family for consistently believing in me and pushing me along the finish line (especially my cousins Johanna, Meli, and Erika). En fin, todos mis éxitos están dedicados a la memoria de mi nana y mi apa. Los amo con todo mi ser. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: GENTRIFICATION AS A WHITENESS PROJECT ....................... 1 Solving “Blight” & Critical Intervention .............................................................. 3 The Eastside: A History ....................................................................................... 9 Literature Review .............................................................................................. 13 Gentrification as Ownership ................................................................... 14 Whiteness as Property and Racialized Space .......................................... 17 Gentrification: A Whiteness Project ....................................................... 21 Methods ............................................................................................................. 24 Chapter Breakdown ........................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER ONE: THE SIXTH-STREET BRIDGE: A GENTRIFYING URBAN BUILT ENVIRONMENT.......................................................................................................... 32 Blight and Redevelopment ................................................................................. 36 Caltrans ............................................................................................................. 39 Sixth-Street Bridge: History & Relevance .......................................................... 40 Maltzan’s Ribbon of Light ................................................................................. 42 L.A. Communication: Roads, Bridges, & Freeways ........................................... 44 Unsafe Bridge .................................................................................................... 51 Region Revitalization ......................................................................................... 54 Silencing of Boyle Heights ................................................................................ 58 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 62 CHAPTER TWO: ARTWASHING EL BARRIO: (RE)MAKING BOYLE HEIGHTS ... 65 Artwashing in Boyle Heights ............................................................................. 69 Whiteness and the Politics of Civility ................................................................. 75 (Re)Centering Whiteness ................................................................................... 79 Centering Civility Discourse .............................................................................. 87 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 93 CHAPTER THREE: DEFENDIENDO EL BARRIO: LOCAL MOVEMENTS CONTESTING GENTRIFICATION ............................................................................. 96 Contextualizing the Gentefication Movement .................................................... 99 Anti-Gentrification Movement: Who Are They? .............................................. 103 Gentefication Movement .................................................................................. 107 Anti-Gentrification Movement ......................................................................... 114 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 120 CONCLUSION: WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? ............................................... 122 A Whiteness Project ......................................................................................... 123 Future Endeavors ............................................................................................. 127 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 131 v LIST OF FIGURES Introduction Figure 0.1. A map of the Eastside .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Title: Suburban Verticalisation in London: Regeneration, Intra-Urban
    Title: Suburban Verticalisation in London: regeneration, intra-urban inequality and social harm Abstract: With the rapid and large scaled expansion of new developments of high rise flats, London’s outer boroughs are seeing a suburban growth not seen since the 1930s. The objective of this mass verticalization are similar to the suburbanisation that occurred in the inter-war period in aiming to provide housing to a growing urban population. However behind the demographic imperative, other economic, socio-cultural and political processes come into play as they did in the past. Considering spatial, social and material transformations, the paper is concerned with a combination of factors, actors, structures and processes in this initial analysis of the new vertical suburbs of London. With this combined perspective, the analysis contributes to critical debates in criminology that are expanding to issues of social harm and social exclusion in the capitalist city. In this paper, I interrogate the fact that an increase of the housing stock only partially addresses the housing crisis in London as the problem of the provision of social housing is becoming increasingly limited under tight budget constraints and a financial structure that relies on and facilitates the involvement of the private sector in the delivery and management of housing. I also question the promises of regeneration solutions through new-build gentrification which have proved ineffective in other urban contexts and should be examined further in the context of London suburbs where the scale of construction is unprecedented and comes to exacerbate inequalities that have long been overlooked when the focus has been on inner boroughs and their gentrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating (A) Sustainability Capital: Urban Agriculture, Eco-Gentrification, and the Uneven Valorization of Social Reproduction
    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 2-2017 Cultivating (a) Sustainability Capital: Urban Agriculture, Eco-Gentrification, and the Uneven Valorization of Social Reproduction Nathan McClintock Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Food Security Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details McClintock, Nathan, "Cultivating (a) Sustainability Capital: Urban Agriculture, Eco-Gentrification, and the Uneven Valorization of Social Reproduction" (2017). Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. 168. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/168 This Post-Print is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. POST-PRINT VERSION Forthcoming, Annals of the American Association of Geographers 2018 Special Issue: Social Justice in the City Accepted 9 February 2017 Cultivating (a) sustainability capital: Urban agriculture, eco-gentrification, and the uneven valorization of social reproduction Nathan McClintock Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University ! [email protected] Abstract. Urban agriculture (UA), for many activists and scholars, plays a prominent role in food justice struggles in cities throughout the Global North, a site of conflict between use and exchange values, and rallying point for progressive claims to the right to the city.
    [Show full text]
  • SETH POLEN 213.595.5726 Direct [email protected] DRE
    SETH POLEN 213.595.5726 Direct [email protected] DRE 01133279 CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLAIMER All materials and information received or derived from KW COMMERCIAL its directors, officers, agents, advisors, affiliates and/or any third party sources are provided without representation or warranty as to completeness , veracity, or accuracy, condition of the property, compliance or lack of compliance with applicable governmental requirements, developability or suitability, financial performance of the property, projected financial performance of the property for any party’s intended use or any and all other matters. Neither KW COMMERCIAL its directors, officers, agents, advisors, or affiliates makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to accuracy or completeness of the materials or information provided, derived, or SETH POLEN received. Materials and information from any source, whether written or verbal, that may be furnished for review DIRECTOR are not a substitute for a party’s active conduct of its own due diligence to determine these and other matters of 213.595.5726 Direct significance to such party. KW COMMERCIAL will not investigate or verify any such matters or conduct due diligence for a party unless otherwise agreed in writing. [email protected] DRE 01133279 EACH PARTY SHALL CONDUCT ITS OWN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION AND DUE DILIGENCE. SETHPOLEN.COM Any party contemplating or under contract or in escrow for a transaction is urged to verify all information and to conduct their own inspections and investigations including through appropriate third party independent professionals selected by such party. All financial data should be verified by the party including by obtaining and reading applicable documents and reports and consulting appropriate independent professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Infill Planning in California's General
    Integrating Infill Planning in California’s General Plans: A Policy Roadmap Based on Best-Practice Communities September 2014 Center for Law, Energy & the Environment (CLEE)1 University of California Berkeley School of Law 1 This report was researched and authored by Christopher Williams, Research Fellow at the Center for Law, Energy and the Environment (CLEE) at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Ethan Elkind, Associate Director of Climate Change and Business Program at CLEE, served as project director. Additional contributions came from Terry Watt, AICP, of Terrell Watt Planning Consultant, and Chris Calfee, Senior Counsel; Seth Litchney, General Plan Guidelines Project Manager; and Holly Roberson, Land Use Council at the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), among other stakeholder reviewers. 1 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Land Use Element ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Find and prioritize infill types most appropriate to your community .......................................... 5 1.2 Make an inclusive list of potential infill parcels, including brownfields ....................................... 9 1.3 Apply simplified mixed-use zoning designations in infill priority areas ...................................... 10 1.4 Influence design choices to
    [Show full text]
  • Granite's Construction Experience
    PUGET SOUND REGION June 8, 2010 Jim Wilkerson Purchasing Division Tacoma Public Utilities 3628 S. 35th Street Tacoma, WA 98409 RE: Statement for Qualifications for Murray Morgan Bridge Rehabilitation Design-Build Project (Specification No: PW10-0128F) Dear Jim: The rehabilitation of the Murray Morgan Bridge offers the City of Tacoma yet another creative element to the City’s infrastructure that provides beneficial use to its citizens while honoring its past. Granite Construction Company (Granite), one of the largest and most established regional and national design-build construction contractors, offers the City of Tacoma a focused team of engineers and subconsultants that has the skills, experience, and local resources to partner with the City on the delivery of this truly unique project. The Granite Team was specifically structured to deliver the most cost-effective approach to reopening the Murray Morgan Bridge by November 2012. In doing so, we are confident that we are the team best suited to: Deliver on your schedule commitments Incorporate quality systems and materials Provide the highest value for the budget Reduce operating and maintenance costs Allow for maximum supplemental work Honor stakeholder commitments To achieve these objectives, Granite has carefully selected the following key team members: FIRM ROLE Granite Construction Company Submitter, Design-Build Contractor HDR Engineering, Inc. Lead Designer (Major Participant) Kleinfelder Quality Management, Materials Testing PRR Public Involvement CivilTech Engineering Retaining Walls & Lifesafety Structures Hough Beck & Baird Urban Streetscape Design & Sustainability Link Controls Electrical Controls Design-Builder Northwest Archaeological Associates Historic/Cultural Specialist Granite / Everett Area Office | 1525 E. Marine View Dr., Everett, WA 98201-1927 | Ph: (425) 551-3100 | Fax: (425) 551-3116 Granite / Whatcom Area Office | 3876 Hannegan Rd., Bellingham, WA 98226-9103 | Ph: (360) 676-2450 | Fax: (360) 733-6735 Granite / Thurston Area Office | 7717 New Market St.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA
    Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA Matthew Barrett Metro Transportation Research Library, Archive & Public Records - metro.net/library Transportation Research Library & Archive • Originally the library of the Los • Transportation research library for Angeles Railway (1895-1945), employees, consultants, students, and intended to serve as both academics, other government public outreach and an agencies and the general public. employee resource. • Partner of the National • Repository of federally funded Transportation Library, member of transportation research starting Transportation Knowledge in 1971. Networks, and affiliate of the National Academies’ Transportation • Began computer cataloging into Research Board (TRB). OCLC’s World Catalog using Library of Congress Subject • Largest transit operator-owned Headings and honoring library, forth largest transportation interlibrary loan requests from library collection after U.C. outside institutions in 1978. Berkeley, Northwestern University and the U.S. DOT’s Volpe Center. • Archive of Los Angeles transit history from 1873-present. • Member of Getty/USC’s L.A. as Subject forum. Accessing the Library • Online: metro.net/library – Library Catalog librarycat.metro.net – Daily aggregated transportation news headlines: headlines.metroprimaryresources.info – Highlights of current and historical documents in our collection: metroprimaryresources.info – Photos: flickr.com/metrolibraryarchive – Film/Video: youtube/metrolibrarian – Social Media: facebook, twitter, tumblr, google+,
    [Show full text]
  • Suburban Gentrification: Understanding the Determinants of Single-Family Residential Redevelopment, a Case Study of the Inner-Ring Suburbs of Chicago, IL, 2000-2010
    Joint Center for Housing Studies Harvard University Suburban Gentrification: Understanding the Determinants of Single-family Residential Redevelopment, A Case Study of the Inner-Ring Suburbs of Chicago, IL, 2000-2010 Suzanne Lanyi Charles February 2011 W11-1 Suzanne Lanyi Charles is the 2008 recipient of the John R. Meyer Dissertation Fellowship The author wishes to thank her dissertation committee members, Richard Peiser, Susan Fainstein, Judith Grant Long, and Daniel McMillen, as well as Eric Belsky for helpful comments and suggestions. She is also grateful to the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, the Real Estate Academic Initiative of Harvard University, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for providing research funding. © by Suzanne Lanyi Charles. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Prepared under Grant Number H-21570 SG from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of University Partnerships. Points of views or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not those of the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University or of any of the persons or organizations providing support to the Joint Center for Housing Studies. Abstract Suburban gentrification is most visible through capital reinvestment in the built environment. In this paper, I examine one type of reinvestment—the incremental, residential redevelopment process in which older single-family housing is demolished and replaced with larger single- family housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Neighborhood Change: Best Practices for Communities Undergoing Gentrification
    Managing Neighborhood Change: Best Practices for Communities Undergoing Gentrification April 20, 2005 Managing Neighborhood Change ― Executive Summary Acknowledgment NeighborWorks â America would like to recognize our partners in the development and oversight of this research, which was initiated by the Atlanta Alliance for Community Development Investment. Through this collaborative effort, NeighborWorks â America partnered with the following Atlanta­based organizations in conducting and evaluating this work: Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership, Inc. (ANDP), Atlanta Housing Association of Neighborhood­based Developers (AHAND), Emory University’s Office of University Community Partnerships, The Enterprise Foundation, and the United Way of Metropolitan Atlanta. The Enterprise Foundation and ANDP also underwrote research expenses. Community members and leaders in the MLK Historic District, Mechanicsville, and Reynoldstown neighborhoods in Atlanta, Jamaica Plain in Boston, and Shaw in Washington, D.C. all provided invaluable assistance and critical insight into the issues shaping their and other communities undergoing gentrification. This research was not possible without the help of specific individuals. In particular, NeighborWorks â America would like to thank the Atlanta Alliance for Community Development Investment Managing Social Change Committee Members for their efforts. Committee members include: Protip Biswas, Sule Carpenter, Karen Curry, Ray Kuniansky, Kate Little, and Elizabeth Wallace. We would also like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Michael Rich, who served as faculty advisor to this effort. Our field research could not have been accomplished without the help of Nuri Ali and Nick Smith. Additional surveyors included Jessica Bibbins, Anisa McCaulla, Cornelius Strange, and Nathan Waters. This report was researched by Kelly Hill, with additional support from Colette Pozzo, lead management consultant in the NeighborWorks ® America Southern District office.
    [Show full text]
  • 1048 S Los Angeles Street Is Located Less Than Three Miles from the Ferrante, a Massive 1,500-Unit Construction Project, Scheduled for Completion in 2021
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM A Signalized Corner Mixed-Use Retail and Office Property Ideally located in the heart of Downtown Los Angeles in the Iconic Fashion District brandonmichaelsgroup.com INVESTMENT ADVISORS Brandon Michaels Senior Managing Director of Investments Senior Director, National Retail Group Tel: 818.212-2794 [email protected] CA License: 01434685 Matthew Luchs First Vice President Investments COO of The Brandon Michaels Group Tel: 818.212.2727 [email protected] CA License: 01948233 Ben Brownstein Senior Investment Associate National Retail Group National Industrial Properties Group Tel: 818.212.2812 [email protected] CA License: 02012808 Contents 04 Executive Summary 10 Property Overview 16 Area Overview 28 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Executive Summary 4 1048 S. Los Angeles St The Offering A Signalized Corner Mixed-Use Retail and Office Property Ideally located in the heart of Downtown Los Angeles in the Iconic Fashion District The Brandon Michaels Group of Marcus & Millichap has been selected to exclusively represent for sale 1048 South Los Angeles Street, a two-story multi-tenant mixed-use retail and office property ideally located on the Northeast signalized corner of Los Angeles Street and East 11th Street. The property is comprised of 15 rental units, with eight retail units on the ground floor, and seven office units on the second story. 1048 South Los Angeles Street is to undergo a $170 million renovation. currently 86% occupied. Three units are The property is located in the heart of vacant, one of which is on the ground the iconic fashion district of Downtown floor, and two of which are on the Los Angeles, which is home to over second story.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtownla VISION PLAN
    your downtownLA VISION PLAN This is a project for the Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council with funding provided by the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Compass Blueprint Program. Compass Blueprint assists Southern California cities and other organizations in evaluating planning options and stimulating development consistent with the region’s goals. Compass Blueprint tools support visioning efforts, infill analyses, economic and policy analyses, and marketing and communication programs. The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) through the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) in accordance with the provisions under the Metropolitan Planning Program as set forth in Section 104(f) of Title 23 of the U.S. Code. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SCAG, DOT or the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. SCAG shall not be responsible for the City’s future use or adaptation of the report. 0CONTENTS 00. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01. WHY IS DOWNTOWN IMPORTANT? 01a. It is the birthplace of Los Angeles 01b. All roads lead to Downtown 01c. It is the civic, cultural, and commercial heart of Los Angeles 02. WHAT HAS SHAPED DOWNTOWN? 02a. Significant milestones in Downtown’s development 02b. From pueblo to urban core 03. DOWNTOWN TODAY 03a. Recent development trends 03b. Public infrastructure initiatives 04.
    [Show full text]
  • Influences of Gentrification on Identity Shift of an Urban Fragment - a Case Study
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Directory of Open Access Journals SPATIUM International Review UDK 711.433(497.113) ; 316.334.56 ; 72.01 No. 21, December 2009, p. 66-75 Original scientific paper INFLUENCES OF GENTRIFICATION ON IDENTITY SHIFT OF AN URBAN FRAGMENT - A CASE STUDY Dejana Nedučin1, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Novi Sad, Serbia Olga Carić, University Business Academy, Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, Novi Sad, Serbia Vladimir Kubet, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Novi Sad, Serbia This paper discusses the process of gentrification, researched through a perspective of its positive and negative aspects. It underlines the importance of reasonable proportioning, sensible structuring and long-term planning of transformation of urban spaces, which contributes to an upgrade of living conditions and qualitative advancement of social consciousness and development of needs of the local inhabitants, regardless of their socio-economic profile. Despite not perceiving gentrification as an a priori negative process, influences of alterations of urban tissue carried out through radical and narrowly interpreted modifications of their character may cause undesired changes in the perception and use of the space and were analyzed as well. A case study of the gentrification of Grbavica, an urban fragment in Novi Sad, Serbia, is presented. The goal of this
    [Show full text]
  • Voices of Compton  Compton Literary / Arts Journal Dr
    Acknowledgements Voices of Compton Compton Literary / Arts Journal Dr. Keith Curry, CEO Ms. Barbara Perez, Vice President Mr. Robert Butler, Student Life Office Mr. Cleveland Palmer, Contributor of Student Artwork Ms. Chelvi Subramaniam, Humanities Chair Dr. Ruth Roach, Publication Coordinator & English Faculty Mr. Jose Bernaudo, Reader & English Faculty Mr. David Maruyama, Reader & English Faculty Ms. Toni Wasserberger, Reader & English Faculty Mr. Patrick McLaughlin, First Year Experience & English Faculty Ms. Amber Gillis, Advisory Team Member and Faculty Member Associated Student Body & Humanities Division Faculty Cover Artwork: Jennifer Deese, Dalia Cornejo, Tyler Sims, Luis Mota, Amy Huerta Cruz, Violeta Martinez, Adriana Sanchez, Marysol Ortiz 2011-2012 Publisher: Southern California Graphics® ©Copyright 2012 All rights reserved. 1 2 Table of Contents |30| Poem about My Own People (Poem) by Lonnie Manuel UPTOWN |31| Man-child: My |40| Emergency Room Pages [13] My Sense of Identity Experience (Essay) (Essay) [4] A Father’s Love (Poem) (Essay) by David Richardson by Jaime Yoshida by Stephanie Bentley by Desiree Lavea |32| Poverty: My Experience |43| “Underdog” (Poem) [4] Self Portrait (Sketch) [15] Love Is (Poem) (Essay) by Carlos Ornelas by Tony McGee by Erica Monique Greer by Rodney Bunkley |43| The Joker (Painting) [5] Untitled (Sketch) [16] Love Confessions |34| Depression from by Ricardo Villeda (Guest) by Tony McGee by Danny Westbrook Oppression (Essay) |44| Children of the Universe [5] Rikki (Poem) [16] Have You Seen the
    [Show full text]