DOCSLIB.ORG

Garden City, Cops to Pay $150G Judgment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Garden City, Cops to Pay $150G Judgment ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT A14 LONG ISLAND ADVERTISEMENT The Blood Pressure Secret You’ve Never Heard Of Garden City, cops to Most people feel like they have lower and healthier blood pressure using been given a life sentence once they’re their Zona Plus device for only minutes pay$150G judgment diagnosed with high blood pressure. a day. Doctors offer little hope other than The science behind Zona Plus BY STEFANIEDAZIO [email protected] telling you to change your diet and take was discovered by a cardiopulmonary blood pressure medication. physiologist, Dr. Ronald L. Wiley, TheVillageofGarden City andits po- For most people with high blood while working for the U.S. Air Force. licedepartment will pay$150,000 to are- pressure, the condition is chronic. And, The study revealed a positive effect on tired Nassau Countycorrection officer even if you manage to get your blood the blood pressure of some of the pilots whoalleged that officers violatedhis civil rights in 2016 when theyraciallyprofiled pressure under control, there is still the who were being tested for “g-force him, and mistook him forashoplifter, ac- constant struggle to keep it there. For blackout.” Dr. Wiley continued to test cording to court documents. Thedefendants—the village, policede- some, diet and medication do not do these observations, eventually designing RD SCHNAPP partment, apolicedetective lieutenant, enough to lower their blood pressure, a smart device that recreates the ideal WA sergeant and twoofficers—did not admit HO and, frankly, some of the side effects can conditions for reducing blood pressure liability, wrongdoing or damages, court Retiredcorrectionofficer RonaldLanier feel just as uncomfortable or worse than through this natural, side-effect free documents show. Alawsuit —which the high blood pressure itself – and you’ll therapy. claimed Ronald Lanier wasassaulted both thesupermarket. be taking it for the rest of your life. The results and the support for verballyand physicallybypoliceand Theofficersallegedlycame up be- It almost seems unreasonable the Zona Plus speak for themselves. sought at least $40 million in damages — hind Lanier,who is black, as he was wasfiled in 2017 in the U.S. District Court shopping, ordered him to puthis hands to think that there could be a way to The American Heart Association, Eastern District. Thejudgment was behind his back and threw him to the manage such a life-threatening condition the Mayo Clinic Health Letter and the signed Monday. ground, Lanier has claimed. He has said without the side effects of medication Harvard Heart Letter are among the Thedefendants will also have to pay theywhispered in his ear,“Yo uwant to though. But, if you don’t manage your organizations that have attested to the forLanier’s attorney fees, which his be atough guy?”and then beathim on lawyer,Frederick Brewington, declined to both sides of his ribs. high blood pressure, it can result in heart effectiveness of Zona Plus therapy. In as disclose. Thetwo sidesmuststill deter- Lanier has said thathecomplied with disease, strokes, risks to your organs, little as six weeks, using the Zona Plus as mine the exact amount. their ordersand said, “I am on the job” vision problems and more. directed can lower your blood pressure “This is an enormous win.Thisisa —aphrase thatlaw enforcement offi- Sometimes the cure feels worse by 10% or more – all with simple hand very positive outcome not onlywith re- cers use to identify themselvestoeach than the disease. Side effects can include exercises customized to you. gard in amonetary outcome butamoral other —and questioned whyhewas outcome,” Brewington said late Monday being detained, saying he haddone noth- trouble sleeping (unfortunately, sleep The proven therapy of the Zona afternoon. ing wrong. deprivation can make your blood pressure Plus can possibly reduce – or even Andrew Preston, an attorneyfor the de- Lanier waswalked through the super- worse during the night, too), feeling eliminate – your long-term dependence fendants, declinedtocomment because marketinhandcuffs and putinthe back of cold (especially in the limbs), a slow on blood pressure medication. the litigation is pending. apolicecar.Hewas later released butnot Lanier hadaccused twowhiteGarden charged, and claimed he drovehimself to heartbeat, dizziness, fatigue, constipation, Imagine the chance to live City policeofficers, George Byrdand the hospital fortreatment of bruises. The swelling in the feet and hands, erectile medication-free while enjoying a healthy John Russell, of raciallyprofiling him at shoplifting suspect waslater appre- dysfunction, possible trouble breathing blood pressure. the Western Beef grocery storeinMine- hended in the supermarket. or shortness of breath, among others. Now is the time to take charge of ola. They were seeking an African Amer- TheNassauCountydistrict attorney’s Just reading this list is enough to your health, naturally and effectively, ican man whohad allegedlyshoplifted a office investigatedand declined to file pursefromavillagestore and raninto chargesagainst Byrdand Russell. make your blood pressure rise. Even if risk-free.Zona Plus comes with a 90- your medication has worked so far, don’t day, money-back guarantee. If you don’t you wish there was a safer alternative to see results within weeks, you can send the maintain lower blood pressure? device back for a full refund. $5.5M MORE TO STYMIE MS-13 For those of us who have not seen blood pressure numbers go down, even BY SCOTTEIDLER men andwomen with job training and on medication or with lifestyle changes, [email protected] career opportunities. Themoney, from there is an alternative which could literally the stateDepartment of Labor,will go to be a lifesaver – and it has proven effective Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo on Monday local organizations. announced $5.5 millioninnew state Ⅲ $2.25million from the State Office of for 90% of users after only weeks of use. fundingfor after-schooland job training Children and FamilyServices to non- m co initiativesaimed at preventing the MS-13 profits,which will help youthreturn to y. A Revolutionary Breakthrough gang from recruiting on Long Island. their communities afterajuvenilejus- da ws At first glance, the Zona Plus™ Visit www.BuyZonaPlus.com Thefundingfor programs thatwould ticeplacement. ne may look like something directly out to learn more about this incredible, divert at-risk youthfromgang lifeisin Ⅲ $250,000 from the state’s Summer addition to $16million that hadprevi- Yo uthEmployment Program forsum- of a sci-fi movie, but the technology is drug-free alternative to healthy blood ouslybeen announced foranti-gang ef- mer jobstoyouth from low-income fami- entirely unique in the medical field, based pressure – or why not get your own Zona forts on Long Island as part of the lies. 15, 2018 on decades of scientific research. Plus smart device today? Use coupon 2018-19state budget. Thestate hadalso Thestate also announced Monday AY allocated $2.5 million to other programs thatthe bidding processhas opened for ,M More than 20 clinical studies have code Newsday50 to receive $50.00 off in Nassau and Suffolk counties through $2 million from the EmpireStateAfter- AY demonstrated the effectiveness of Zona your purchase. otherinitiatives. School Programgrants forlocal nonprof- UESD Plus therapy in reducing blood pressure Make the commitment to a healthy “With these investments,New Yo rk is its and high-need school districtsinNas- ,T by an impressive average of 10% within blood pressure and a better life, naturally. sendingamessage loud and clear that sauand Suffolk. Thefour-year grants let AY weeks. Zona Plus users report better, gang activityhas no placeinour commu- nonprofits and schoolsystems expand www.BuyZonaPlus.com | 800.823.1725 nities,”Cuomo said in anewsrelease. after-school programs, and the initiative NEWSD Thefunding state agencies includes: is expected to create 1,250new slots for Ⅲ $3 million aimed at providing young Long Island children..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Collecting Money from a Small Claims Judgment
    If the defendant is not present at the fies the defendant and his/her property. trial, the court will send a copy of the small claims judgment to the defendant. The • If you have the information described judgment will order the defendant to pay above, you can start the process for an you in full within 21 days or tell you and the order to seize property or for garnishment. court where s/he works and the location of his/her bank accounts. • If you don't have the information described above, you will need to order the 3. If the defendant doesn't pay the defendant to appear in court for questioning judgment as ordered, you will have to through a process called discovery. You can collect your money through a seizure of start this process by filing a discovery subpoena. property or a garnishment. Filing a Discovery Subpoena COLLECTING MONEY FROM A What Is Seizure of Property? You must wait 21 days after your small SMALL CLAIMS JUDGMENT Seizure of property is a court procedure claims judgment was signed before you can allowing a court officer to seize property file a discovery subpoena. Form MC 11, If you sued someone for money and belonging to the defendant which can be sold Subpoena (Order to Appear), can be used. received a judgment against that person, you to pay for your judgment. If you want to file a have the right to collect the money. request to seize property, you may use form Contact the court for an appearance date MC 19, Request and Order to Seize Property.
    [Show full text]
  • “Law of Precedent”
    1 Summary of papers written by Judicial Officers on the subje ct: ªLAW OF PRECEDENTº Introduction :- A precedent is a statement of law found in the decision of a superior Court, which decision has to be followed by that court and by the courts inferior to it. Precedent is a previous decision upon which the judges have to follow the past decisions carefully in the cases before them as a guide for all present or future decisions. In other words, `Judicial Precedent' means a judgment of a Court of law cited as an authority for deciding a similar set of facts, a case which serves as authority for the legal principle embodied in its decision. A judicial precedent is a decision of the Court used as a source for future decision making. Meaning :- A precedent is a statement of law found in decision of a Superior Court. Though law making is the work of the legislature, Judges make law through the precedent. 2 Inferior courts must follow such laws. Decisions based on a question of law are precedents. Decisions based on question of facts are not precedents. Judges must follow the binding decisions of Superior or the same court. Following previous binding decisions brings uniformity in decision making, not following would result in confusion. It is well settled that Article 141 of the Constitution empowers the Supreme Court to declare the law and not to enact the law, which essentially is the function of the legislature. To declare the law means to interpret the law. This interpretation of law is binding on all the Courts in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Meritorious Summary Judgment Motions
    Examples of meritorious summary judgment motions By: Douglas H. Wilkins and Daniel I. Small February 13, 2020 Our last two columns addressed the real problem of overuse of summary judgment. Underuse is vanishingly rare. Even rarer (perhaps non-existent) is the case in which underuse ends up making a difference in the long run. But there are lessons to be learned by identifying cases in which you really should move for summary judgment. It is important to provide a reference point for evaluating the wisdom of filing a summary judgment motion. Here are some non-exclusive examples of good summary judgment candidates. Unambiguous written document: Perhaps the most common subject matter for a successful summary judgment motion is the contracts case or collections matter in which the whole dispute turns upon the unambiguous terms of a written note, contract, lease, insurance policy, trust or other document. See, e.g. United States Trust Co. of New York v. Herriott, 10 Mass. App. Ct. 131 (1980). The courts have said, quite generally, that “interpretation of the meaning of a term in a contract” is a question of law for the court. EventMonitor, Inc. v. Leness, 473 Mass. 540, 549 (2016). That doesn’t mean all questions of contract interpretation — just the unambiguous language. When the language of a contract is ambiguous, it is for the fact-finder to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the parties. See Acushnet Company v. Beam, Inc., 92 Mass. App. Ct. 687, 697 (2018). Ambiguous contracts are therefore not fodder for summary judgment. Ironically, there may be some confusion about what “unambiguous” means.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Summary Judgment Motion? Notice for Parties Who Do Not Have a Lawyer
    What is a Summary Judgment Motion? Notice for Parties Who Do Not Have a Lawyer A summary judgment motion was filed in your case. A summary judgment motion asks the court to decide this case without having a trial. Here are some important things to know. What is summary judgment? Summary judgment is a way for one party to win their case without a trial. The party can ask for summary judgment for part of the case or for the whole case. What happens if I ignore the motion? If you do not respond to the summary judgment motion, you can lose your case without the judge hearing from you. If you are the plaintiff or petitioner in the case, that means that your case can be dismissed. If you are the defendant or respondent, that means the plaintiff or petitioner can get everything they asked for in the complaint. How do I respond to a summary judgment motion? You can file a brief and tell the judge about the law and the facts that support your side of the case. A brief is not evidence and the facts that you write about in your brief need to be supported by evidence. You can file sworn affidavits, declarations, and other paperwork to support your case. An affidavit or declaration is a sworn statement of fact that is based on personal knowledge and is admissible as evidence. If you are a plaintiff or petitioner, you cannot win a summary judgment motion just by saying what is in your complaint. Instead, you need to give evidence such as affidavits or declarations.
    [Show full text]
  • Plaintiff Must Prove Service on Motion to Vacate Default Judgment by Erin Louise Palmer , Litigation News Contributing Editor – May 12, 2015
    Plaintiff Must Prove Service on Motion to Vacate Default Judgment By Erin Louise Palmer , Litigation News Contributing Editor – May 12, 2015 Service by certified mail is insufficient to satisfy the plaintiff’s burden in a motion to vacate a default judgment, according to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania . In Myers v. Moore , the district court granted the defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment of more than $1 million where the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the defendants had actual knowledge of the lawsuit and where the plaintiff failed to establish that she properly served the complaint on defendants or their authorized agents. Observers question how a plaintiff would satisfy these evidentiary hurdles. Plaintiff Awarded $1 Million Default Judgment The lawsuit arises out of a stage-diving incident at a music venue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. During a performance, the lead singer of the band Fishbone, Angelo C. Moore, dove into the crowd and knocked over the plaintiff, causing her serious injuries. The plaintiff sued Moore, John Noorwood Fisher (Fishbone’s bass player), Fishbone, Fishbone’s manager, and other parties associated with the venue for negligence and civil conspiracy in producing the concert and failing to warn the audience that the concert would feature stage diving. The plaintiff also sued Moore, Fisher, and Fishbone for assault and battery. After the plaintiff reached settlements with some of the defendants, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims against the non-settling defendants, including Moore and Fisher. The plaintiff brought another action on February 3, 2012, against the non-settling defendants for negligence, civil conspiracy, and assault and battery.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure
    TEXAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE Table of Contents SECTION ONE. (c) Where to File. GENERAL PROVISIONS (d) Order of the Court. Rule 1. Scope of Rules; Local Rules of Courts of Rule 5. Fees in Civil Cases Appeals Rule 6. Representation by Counsel 1.1. Scope. 6.1. Lead Counsel 1.2. Local Rules (a) For Appellant. (a) Promulgation. (b) For a Party Other Than Appellant. (b) Copies. (c) How to Designate. (c) Party's Noncompliance. 6.2. Appearance of Other Attorneys Rule 2. Suspension of Rules 6.3. To Whom Communications Sent Rule 3. Definitions; Uniform Terminology 6.4. Nonrepresentation Notice 3.1. Definitions (a) In General. (b) Appointed Counsel. 3.2. Uniform Terminology in Criminal Cases 6.5. Withdrawal (a) Contents of Motion. Rule 4. Time and Notice Provisions (b) Delivery to Party. (c) If Motion Granted. 4.1. Computing Time (d) Exception for Substitution of (a) In General. Counsel. (b) Clerk's Office Closed or Inaccessible. 6.6. Agreements of Parties or Counsel 4.2. No Notice of Trial Court’s Judgment Rule 7. Substituting Parties in Civil Case (a) Additional Time to File Documents. 7.1. Parties Who Are Not Public Officers (1) In general. (a) Death of a Party. (2) Exception for restricted appeal. (1) Civil Cases. (b) Procedure to Gain Additional Time. (2) Criminal Cases. (c) The Court’s Order. (b) Substitution for Other Reasons. 4.3. Periods Affected by Modified 7.2. Public Officers Judgment in Civil Case (a) Automatic Substitution of Officer. (a) During Plenary-Power Period. (b) Abatement. (b) After Plenary Power Expires.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Dispositive Motions: a Basic Breakdown
    Civil Dispositive Motions: A Basic Breakdown 1) Simplified Timeline: Motion for 12(b)(6) Motions JNOV** Summary Judgment Motions* Motion for New Trial Motion Motion for D.V. for D.V. (Rul 10 days Discovery and Mediation Plaintiff‟s Defendant‟s Evidence Evidence Process Complaint Trial Jury‟s Entry of Judgment Filed Begins Verdict * Defendant may move at any time. Plaintiff must wait until 30 days after commencement of action. **Movant must have moved for d.v. after close of evidence. 2) Pre-Trial Motions: Rule 12(b)(6) and Summary Judgment A. Rule 12(b)(6) Motions to Dismiss 1. Challenge the sufficiency of the complaint on its face. Movant asks the court to dismiss the complaint for “failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” 2. Standard: The court may grant the motion if the allegations in the complaint are insufficient or defective as a matter of law in properly stating a claim for relief. For example: a) The complaint is for fraud, which requires specific pleading, but a required element of fraud is not alleged. 1 b) The complaint alleges breach of contract, but incorporates by reference (and attaches) a contract that is unenforceable as a matter of law. c) The complaint alleges a claim against a public official in a context in which that official has immunity as a matter of law. 3. The court only looks at the complaint (and documents incorporated by reference). a) If the court looks outside the complaint, the motion is effectively converted to a summary judgment and should be treated under the provisions of Rule 56.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Stages of Federal Litigation: Overview
    Initial Stages of Federal Litigation: Overview MARCELLUS MCRAE AND ROXANNA IRAN, GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP WITH HOLLY B. BIONDO AND ELIZABETH RICHARDSON-ROYER, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION A Practice Note explaining the initial steps of a For more information on commencing a lawsuit in federal court, including initial considerations and drafting the case initiating civil lawsuit in US district courts and the major documents, see Practice Notes, Commencing a Federal Lawsuit: procedural and practical considerations counsel Initial Considerations (http://us.practicallaw.com/3-504-0061) and Commencing a Federal Lawsuit: Drafting the Complaint (http:// face during a lawsuit's early stages. Specifically, us.practicallaw.com/5-506-8600); see also Standard Document, this Note explains how to begin a lawsuit, Complaint (Federal) (http://us.practicallaw.com/9-507-9951). respond to a complaint, prepare to defend a The plaintiff must include with the complaint: lawsuit and comply with discovery obligations The $400 filing fee. early in the litigation. Two copies of a corporate disclosure statement, if required (FRCP 7.1). A civil cover sheet, if required by the court's local rules. This Note explains the initial steps of a civil lawsuit in US district For more information on filing procedures in federal court, see courts (the trial courts of the federal court system) and the major Practice Note, Commencing a Federal Lawsuit: Filing and Serving the procedural and practical considerations counsel face during a Complaint (http://us.practicallaw.com/9-506-3484). lawsuit's early stages. It covers the steps from filing a complaint through the initial disclosures litigants must make in connection with SERVICE OF PROCESS discovery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ascent of Summary Judgment and Its Consequences for State Courts and State Law
    Pound Civil Justice Institute 2008 Forum for State Appellate Court Judges Summary Judgment on the Rise: Is Justice Falling? THE ASCENT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR STATE COURTS AND STATE LAW Arthur R. Miller * New York University School of Law Executive Summary Professor Miller begins by placing the efforts to liberalize non-trial adjudication in the context of the numerous “reforms” made in response to perceptions of a “litigation explosion.” These include changes to substantive tort law, enhanced sanctions against attorneys, and procedural changes that facilitate disposition of cases short of trial on the merits. He agrees that greater efficiency for the courts is a laudable goal, but he cautions that courts must be sensitive to litigants’ rights to have their day in court and to have their cases heard by juries. In Section II, Professor Miller recounts briefly the history of expedited disposition, including early English and American procedures. He reviews the development of federal Rule 56 and its early reception in the courts, where moving parties initially were required to show the absence of issues of fact, and trials could be had if there was the “slightest doubt” as to the facts. Section III looks at the popular perceptions that emerged in the 1970s that modern civil litigation carries with it heavy social costs. Professor Miller catalogues a number of procedural changes made in response to those perceptions, including amendments to federal Rules 8, 9, 11, 16, and 26, and some special legislation like the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Although those procedural changes addressed specific concerns around the edges of litigation, none of them offered the definitive advantages of final judgment on the merits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Difference Between an Order and a Judgment
    The Difference between an Order and a Judgment When a magistrate has heard evidence in a case and makes a decision based on that evidence, the formal document reflecting that decision is a judgment of the court. It is recorded on the appropriate AOC-CVM judgment form, signed by the magistrate, and filed with the clerk. Entry of judgment is one of the law’s Momentous Moments—like the effect of a deed, a divorce decree, or an honorable discharge, the rights of an individual are significantly different the moment after judgment is entered than the moment before. Because of this, a fundamental legal preference is expressed in the phrase “finality of judgments.” A judgment can be modified or set aside, but not without observation of formal legal requirements and never without good reason. One of many confusing facts in the world of small claims law is that when a plaintiff fails to prove the case by the greater weight of the evidence, the law (and the AOC forms) uses the term dismissal to describe the outcome. In the larger legal world, to say a case is dismissed means that it has been finally disposed of without the parties having produced evidence and the court deciding it on the merits. In Small Claims Land, that’s also true, but the word is used more broadly to encompass a decision on the merits against the plaintiff. While the terminology overlaps, it’s important to distinguish the two very different outcomes, one of which is a judgment on the merits and the other is .
    [Show full text]
  • [Proposed] Final Judgment : U.S. V. National Association of Police Equipment Distributors, Inc
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-80703 ) v. ) ) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ) POLICE EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS, ) INC. ) ) Defendant. ) FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiff, United States of America, filed its Complaint on July 29, 2002. Plaintiff and defendant, National Association of Police Equipment Distributors, Inc. (“NAPED”), by their respective attorneys, have consented to the entry of this Final Judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law. This Final Judgment shall not constitute any evidence against or an admission by any party with respect to any issue of fact or law herein. Therefore, before the taking of any testimony and without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law herein, and upon consent of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, as follows: I. Jurisdiction and Venue This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the defendant. The Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted against the defendant under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §1. Venue is proper in the District Court for the Southern District of Florida. II. Definitions As used in this Final Judgment: A. “Agreement” means a contract, arrangement, or understanding, formal or informal, oral or written, between two or more persons. B. “Dealer” or “Distributor” means any person that distributes police equipment products manufactured by another person or who purchases or acquires such products for resale to any other person. C. “GSA” means General Services Administration of the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GREG ANDERSON Petitioner, VS. GARY HERBERT et. al. Respondents. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Greg Anderson pro se 24 South 7' Street Tooele, Utah 84074 Phone: 385 231-5005 NOV 1 - 2018 QUESTION PRESENTED Is a judgment void on its face, when a State Court steals a paid-for home at the motion to dismiss stage of the proceedings, under the guise that the owner was a tenant, where plaintiff attorneys misrepresented the law and contractual terms of the purchase contract 30 times in a 6 page document, then wrote the "Statement of Facts and Conclusions of Law," with no reference to the purported record, and the judge rubber-stamped plaintiffs claims, and the court denied itself jurisdiction by not strictly adhering to the statute, thereby implicating conspiracy. 11 PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW Petitioner is Greg Anderson. Respondents Are Gary Herbert in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Utah, Sean Reyes in His Official Capacity as Attorney General for the State of Utah, Clark A McClellan, in His Individual Capacity, and in His Official Capacity for His Extra- judicial Acts, Third District Court, in its Official Capacity, Eighth District Court in its Official Capacity, Utah Court of Appeals in its Official Capacity, Daniel W. Kitchen, James L. Ahistrom, Terry Welch, Lynn Kitchen, Gary Kitchen, Mathew J. Kitchen, Mark R. Kitchen, Sandbay LLC Sunlake LLC, Orchid Beach LLC Roosevelt Hills LLC, John or Jane Doe(s) 1 Through 10 Note: No John or Jane Doe's have been named, nor have any other parties.
    [Show full text]