Great Barrier Reef

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Great Barrier Reef 1 Great Barrier Reef Basin countries Australia Summary of basin characteristics Hervey Bay. The largest of the developed catchments is the Fitzroy, at just over 150,000km2, while the hirty-four sub-basins (or catchments) form Mossman River is the smallest at just 490km2. Eight the ‘basin’ of the Great Barrier Reef. These catchments are in relatively pristine condition, while Tcover an area of 370,000km2 and extend from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has set the tip of Cape York, south to the Mary River near pollutant reduction targets for the remaining 26. Managing Rivers Wisely 2 Great Barrier Reef Socio-economic importance ■ The Fitzroy River dumps more sediment into the Sugarcane is the major crop grown along the low- Reef than any other river. lying and ecologically sensitive areas adjacent to the ■ About 60-80 per cent of freshwater coastal wet- Great Barrier Reef. Grazing land, supporting an lands in the Queensland Wet Tropics have now estimated 5 million cattle, occupies over 80 per cent been lost due to sugarcane growing and other of the reef’s catchment. Horticulture (the growing of coastal development, which has effectively bananas, other tree crops such as mangos, and removed the natural filtration mechanism for vegetable crops such as tomatoes) is growing rapidly water flowing to the Reef. along the northern coastline, and aquaculture is also a ■ By 1994, 8,800 tonnes of nitrogen were dis- fast-developing industry. There are currently 40 charged annually into the sea from Queensland’s licensed aquaculture operations adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, including 25 marine prawn sugarcane land, most of which lies along the farms covering around 542ha. The Reef is also a Great Barrier Reef coastline. tourism ‘hotspot’ such that many people living in the ■ Pesticides from sugarcane – and increasingly coastal towns and cities rely on the Reef for their from banana and cotton growing – are contami- daily income. However, large-scale tourism also nating inshore sea grass meadows and even the brings with it the impacts of coastal development and dugong themselves. associated problems of pollution and sewage disposal. ■ The herbicide diuron has been found at levels high enough to affect marine life. Biodiversity values ■ Inshore corals are suffering under a load of mud, Given the Great Barrier Reef’s status as a global icon nutrients and pesticides, with those along the of the natural world, its biodiversity values need little explanation. These have resulted in World Heritage Wet Tropics coastline and in the Whitsunday Convention listing (yet curiously not listing under Islands being the worst affected. the Ramsar Convention as a Wetland of International Importance). The region embraces a huge range of Role of WWF and its partners different habitats, from coral to mangroves, saltmarsh communities to sea grass meadows and WWF’s main roles have been to raise awareness of lagoons. The latter are important habitats for marine the threat to the inshore reefs and sea grass turtles and dugong Dugong dugon. communities of the Great Barrier Reef from land- based pollution, and to be a catalyst for political Priority issues for river basin action and policy reform. The release of WWF’s management ‘Great Barrier Reef Pollution Report Card’ in June 2001 marked the commencement of a campaign to Sediment, nutrient and pesticide runoff from draw attention to the seriousness of the pollution agricultural activities threatens over 200 inshore problem, backed by scientifically rigorous reefs. WWF’s Great Barrier ‘Reef Pollution Report information presented in an easy-to-read style. Card’, released in June 2001, included the following Through combined information provision, summary of issues and concerns: awareness raising and active lobbying, WWF has been successful in gaining substantial commitments ■ Twenty-eight million tonnes of sediment flow from the national and Queensland state governments into the Reef on average every year – equiva- for the development of a Reef Water Quality lent to some 9,600 truck-loads of soil per day. Protection Plan. WWF hopes the final plan will (By contrast, it is estimated that the total sedi- include a range of new incentives, reforms to existing ment load from Great Barrier Reef catchments regulations and planning mechanisms, and prior to the arrival of Europeans was just 7.4 information and education initiatives aimed in million tonnes per year.) Land clearing and particular at forging stronger links between farmers overgrazing is responsible for the vast majority and the scientific community. of this sediment. Several of WWF’s recommendations have been Great Barrier Reef 3 incorporated into the Sugar Industry Reform Great Barrier Reef, from new developments Program, the key elements of which are: originating outside their boundaries. A unique aspect of the proposed Reef Water Quality Protection Plan ■ The overarching Sugar Industry Reform Plan: is that targets for the quality of water required to this must now include environmental objectives maintain the Reef’s health will be set for each river and priorities – ecological sustainability will be system (from headwaters to the river mouth). a vital component of the criteria that the govern- ment uses to assess the plan. Conservation method demonstrated ■ Regional Business Plans for each of the key This case study demonstrates how a carefully regional sugarcane growing areas: these will orchestrated campaign can convince decision-makers now have to demonstrate how a ‘whole of indus- of the importance of integrated river basin try’ systems approach will be used to address management as a means of reducing land-based environmental issues and to deliver improved marine pollution. In this instance it helped that the environmental outcomes, consistent with contin- environmental asset being impacted was a global ual quality improvement of water entering the icon. However, the environmental conditions built Great Barrier Reef. into the Sugar Industry Reform Program are also of ■ Reform projects funded under the programme: great significance, as are the funds acquired to these will have to achieve substantial reductions enhance wetland management. in sediment, nutrient and pesticide runoff. Project assessment criteria will give credit for Resources devoted enhanced riparian and wetland protection to improve the health of the Great Barrier Reef. Funding for this campaign came from WWF- ■ Environmental expertise: this is a specific Netherlands, totalling more than US$700,000 over requirement in the committees established to three years (2001-2004). develop the Industry Reform Plan and the Regional Business Plans. Chronology WWF played a key role in securing some 2001 ● US$10.5 million for the Sugar Industry Reform June: WWF-Australia releases Great Barrier Reef Program, to be dedicated to wetland conservation pollution report. ● and management in the Great Barrier Reef August: Premier of Queensland establishes Great catchments, principally as a pollution management Barrier Reef Task Force to address pollution issues. ● tool. This funding will be integrated into the Reef September: Catchment Water Quality Management Water Quality Protection Plan, to be distributed Plan released by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park through a range of mechanisms including incentives Management Authority. and stewardship agreements with landholders, 2002 collaborative management approaches, and ● Queensland Reef Science Panel and intergovernmental community education and awareness raising. This Reef Water Quality Committee established; federal sum is in addition to existing government plans to government inquiry into the sugar industry initiated. invest US$10 million in wetland conservation in ● April: WWF makes submission to the Sugar Industry Queensland. Inquiry. A driving force for mitigation of the threats to ● June: report released recommending major structural the Great Barrier Reef from adjoining river reforms to the sugar industry. Reef Water Quality catchments is Australian federal legislation. WWF inquiry established by the Productivity Commission. helped negotiate the Environment Protection & ● August: Premier of Queensland and Prime Minister Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999), through which announce a Memorandum of Understanding to protect interested citizens and state governments can the Reef from land-based pollution, and their intention regulate threats to World Heritage sites, including the to develop a joint Reef Water Quality Protection Plan. Managing Rivers Wisely 4 Great Barrier Reef ● November: draft report from the Productivity ● September: final joint Federal-Queensland Commission’s inquiry released. Government Reef Water Quality Protection Plan ● December: Great Barrier Reef Catchment wetlands (expected to be) finalized. package approved, plus other environmental reforms for the sugar industry. 2003 ● January: Premier of Queensland releases Reef Science Lead WWF office contact Panel’s report and draft Reef Water Quality Protection Plan to limited number of stakeholders. Ms Imogen Zethoven WWF-Australia (Queensland) ● February: targeted stakeholder consultation in relation PO Box 710 to the plan and release of the Productivity Spring Hill, Queensland 4004 Commission’s report on ‘Industries, Land Use and Australia Water Quality in the Great Barrier Reef Catchment’; T: +61 7 3839 2677 WWF submits comments on the draft Reef Water F: +61 7 3839 2633 Quality Protection Plan. E: [email protected] ● May: draft plan released to
Recommended publications
  • Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021
    Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021 Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 – 2021 Page 1 Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was developed and produced by Cape York Natural Resource Management Ltd (Cape York NRM). Cape York NRM would like to acknowledge the following organisations and their officers for their contribution and support in developing the Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan: Cook Shire Council Northern Peninsula Area Regional Council Aurukun, Hopevale, Kowanyama Lockhart, Mapoon, Napranum, Pormpuraaw and Wujal Wujal Aboriginal Shire Councils Weipa Town Authority Rio Tinto (Alcan) Biosecurity Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection Department of Natural resources and Mines Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Far North Queensland Regional Organisation of Councils Individual Cape York Peninsula Registered Native Title Body Corporates and Land Trusts Cape York Weeds and Feral Animals Incorporated Copyright 2016 Published by Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Ltd. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts of the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the Chief Executive Officer, Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Ltd. Please reference as: Cape York Natural Resource Management 2016, Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 -2021, Report prepared by the Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Disclaimer: This Plan has been compiled in good faith as a basis for community and stakeholder consultation and is in draft form.
    [Show full text]
  • Lodge Fact Sheet
    Baillie Lodges Finlayvale Road, Mossman QLD 4873 T 61 7 4098 1666 E [email protected] W silkyoakslodge.com.au FACT SHEET Location COOKTOWN Silky Oaks Lodge is set on 32 hectares (80 acres) of pristine rainforest above the gently flowing Mossman River, approximately 60 minutes’ drive from Cairns and GREAT BARRIER 20 minutes from Port Douglas, the gateway to the Great Barrier Reef. Also within COOKTOWN REEF ROSSVILLE easy reach are Mossman Gorge and the magnificent wilderness of Cape Tribulation. MOSSMAN CAPE TRIBULATION GORGE PORT DOUGLAS Tropical North Queensland is a remarkable region where Australia’s celebrated CAIRNS BLOOMFIELD Daintree Rainforest meets the World Heritage-listed Great Barrier Reef. At an RIVER estimated 180 million years old, the Daintree Rainforest is regarded as the oldest in the world. It is one of the most complex ecosystems on earth, containing living CAPE examples of ancient plants unique to the area as well as hundreds of species of TRIBULATION birds, animals and reptiles. The Daintree is home to the indigenous Kuku Yalanji people who have a deep connection with the land. DAINTREE RIVER CORAL SEA Climate DAINTREE Part of the Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area, the Daintree AGINCOURT DAINTREE LOW ISLES REEF climate is characterised by two distinct seasons: the dry season from April NATIONAL PARK to November offers warm days and cool nights with low humidity ranging in SILKY OAKS LODGE temperature from 19-30°C; December to March is considered the green season MOSSMAN MOSSMAN GORGE as the days and nights are hotter with more frequent restorative showers and PORT DOUGLAS temperatures between 22-32°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Specific Ecologically Relevant Water Quality Targets for the Great Barrier Reef
    Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier Reef Jon Brodie, Mark Baird, Jane Waterhouse, Mathieu Mongin, Jenny Skerratt, Cedric Robillot, Rachael Smith, Reinier Mann and Michael Warne TropWATER Report number 17/38 June 2017 Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier Reef Report prepared by Jon Brodie1, Mark Baird2, Jane Waterhouse1, Mathieu Mongin2, Jenny Skerratt2, Cedric Robillot3, Rachael Smith4, Reinier Mann4 and Michael Warne4,5 2017 1James Cook University, 2CSIRO, 3eReefs, 4Department of Science, Information Technology and Innovation, 5Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom EHP16055 – Update and add to the existing 2013 Scientific Consensus Statement to incorporate the most recent science and to support the 2017 update of the Reef Water Quality Protection Plan Input and review of the development of the targets provided by John Bennett, Catherine Collier, Peter Doherty, Miles Furnas, Carol Honchin, Frederieke Kroon, Roger Shaw, Carl Mitchell and Nyssa Henry throughout the project. Centre for Tropical Water & Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER) James Cook University Townsville Phone: (07) 4781 4262 Email: [email protected] Web: www.jcu.edu.au/tropwater/ Citation: Brodie, J., Baird, M., Waterhouse, J., Mongin, M., Skerratt, J., Robillot, C., Smith, R., Mann, R., Warne, M., 2017. Development of basin-specific ecologically relevant water quality targets for the Great Barrier
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Australian Museum
    RECORDS AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM EDITED BY THE CURATOR Vol VI H. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES. R. ETHERIDGE, Junr., J. P. Qturatov. SYDNEY, 1910-1913. 5^^^ l^ ^ll ^ CONTENTS. No. I. Published 1 5th November, 19 JO. pagb; North Queensland Ethnogi'aphy. By Walter E. Roth No. 14. Transport and Trade 1 No. 15. Decoration, Deformation, and Clothing 20 No. 16. Huts and Shelters 55 No. 17. Postures and Abnormalities 67 No. 18. Social and Individual Nomenclature ... 79 No. 2. Published 27th January, I9n. Description of Cranial Remains from Whaugarei, New Zealand By W. Ramsay Smith ... ... ... ... 107 The Results of Deep-Sea Investigations in the Tasman Sea. I. The Expedition of H.M.C.S. " Miner." No. 5. Polyzoa Supplement. By C. M. Maplestone ... ... ... 113 Mineralogical Notes. No. ix. Topaz, Quartz, Monazite, and other Australian Minerals. By C. Anderson ... ... 120 No. 3. Published 6th May, J9I2. Descriptions of some New or Noteworthy Shells in the Australian Museum. By Chai'les Hedley. ... ... ... 131 No. 4. Published 1 8th April, 19 13. Australian Tribal Names with their Synonyms. By W. W, Thorpe ... ... ... ... ... 161 Title Page, Contents, and Indices ... ... ... 193 — — — LIST OF THE CONTRIBUTORS. With Reference to the Articles contributed by each. Anderson, Chas. : PACK Miueralogical Notes. No. ix. Topaz, Quartz. Mouazite, and other Australian Minerals ... ... ... 120 Medley, Chas. Desoriptions of Ronie New or Noteworthy Shells in the Australian Museum ... ... .. ... 131 Maplestone, C. M. :— The Results of Deep-Sea Investigations in the Tasman Sea. I. The Expedition of H.M.C.S. "Miner." No. 5. Polyzoa. Supplement ... ... ... 118 Roth, Walter E. :— North Queensland Ethnography.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Information
    Media Information Silky Oaks Lodge Neighbouring the World Heritage-listed wilderness of the Daintree National Park, Silky Oaks Lodge offers guests a stylish rainforest escape. Long regarded as Tropical North Queensland’s luxury bolt-hole, Silky Oaks Lodge is ideally located for access to the region’s spectacular natural attractions, including the Daintree Rainforest, Mossman Gorge, the Great Barrier Reef and Cape Tribulation. It’s also an easy transfer to the stylish restaurant and shopping precinct at nearby Port Douglas. Silky Oaks Lodge is set on 32 hectares (80 acres) of pristine rainforest above the gently flowing Mossman River, approximately 60 minutes’ drive from Cairns and 20 minutes from Port Douglas, the gateway to the Great Barrier Reef. With views over the crystal-clear Mossman River and enveloped by the lush rainforest, guests relax in one of forty private treehouse rooms, each a luxurious retreat complete with generous balcony and hammock ready to sway in the afternoon breeze. Dining in the open-air restaurant welcomes the sights and sounds of the rainforest, with menus designed to be light and refreshing in contemporary Australian style with Asian influences. Premium Australian wines make a perfect accompaniment to meals, while a range of local craft beers and small- batch spirits are on offer to wind down after a day’s exploring. Adventures abound for all, with complimentary experiences at Silky Oaks Lodge including yoga, snorkelling in the Mossman River, rainforest hikes and mountain bikes. Driving safaris in the Daintree, indigenous guided walks, snorkelling and diving the Great Barrier Reef and helicopter tours are available at an additional cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Griggs, Peter. "Deforestation and Sugar Cane Growing in Eastern Australia, 1860–1995." Environment and History 13, No
    The White Horse Press Full citation: Griggs, Peter. "Deforestation and Sugar Cane Growing in Eastern Australia, 1860–1995." Environment and History 13, no. 3 (Aug, 2007): 255–83. http://www.environmentandsociety.org/node/3299. Rights: All rights reserved. © The White Horse Press 2007. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this article may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission from the publishers. For further information please see http://www.whpress.co.uk. Deforestation and Sugar Cane Growing in Eastern Australia, 1860–1995 PETER GRIGGS School of Earth and Environmental Sciences James Cook University – Cairns Campus PO Box 6811 Cairns Queensland, Australia 4870 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Deforestation associated with the cultivation of sugar cane in the coastal lands of Eastern Australia commenced in the 1860s. Beyond the initial large-scale clearing of the native vegetation to create arable land, the growing of sugar cane placed other demands upon the native forests. The vegetation was cleared to provide timber for buildings, railway sleepers, to supply the firewood for the sugar mill boilers and in some instances to supply the timber used in at least half a dozen Australian sugar mills that were adapted to manufacture lumber in the non-crushing season. Newspapers descriptions, archival records and scientific reports are used to reconstruct the methods adopted to clear the forests and the speed and extent of the loss of forests in the sugar cane growing lands of Eastern Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aboriginal Walking Tracks and Camp Sites in the Douglas Shire, North Qwensland
    SOME ABORIGINAL WALKING TRACKS AND CAMP SITES IN THE DOUGLAS SHIRE, NORTH QWENSLAND C. R. ncCRA- Mssmn, North &eensland INTRODUCTION The Douglas Shire is a small coastal shire in the wet tropics of North Queensland, lying between Buchan Point in the south and Bloomfield in the north (Figure 1 ) . It is dominated by steep rainf orest-covered mountains with a narrow coastal strip, rising from sea level to 1370m in only 6km. Annual rainfall varies from lOOOmm in the south to 3750mm in the north. It is a very well watered district with four main rivers and several good creeks, -all of which are very fast-f lowing. Before clearing began, two-thirds of the Shire'was under heavy tropical rainforest, the other third was timbered grassland (eucalypt and wattle) with some*melaleuca and mangrove swamps. There are also beaches, sand ridges, mangrove-lined rivers and creeks, and some salt pans. My interest in Aboriginal walking tracks in this region began in the 1920's, when I was a young lad. We lived on a farm on the banks of the South Mossman River where we often met local Aborigines, the men all carrying their spears wherever they went. Sometimes there were strangers with them who said they came from Kuranda, Bloomfield, Daintree or other distant places. There were no direct koads to these , places that we knew of and we learnt that they used their own walking tracks. As a pig hunter around cane farina, I often saw such tracks in the rainforest and at time? used them for access to cleared land.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Management in Australia Building Flood Resilience in a Changing Climate
    Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia Building flood resilience in a changing climate Neil Dufty, Molino Stewart Pty Ltd Andrew Dyer, IAG Maryam Golnaraghi (lead investigator of the flood risk management report series and coordinating author), The Geneva Association Flood Risk Management in Australia 1 The Geneva Association The Geneva Association was created in 1973 and is the only global association of insurance companies; our members are insurance and reinsurance Chief Executive Officers (CEOs). Based on rigorous research conducted in collaboration with our members, academic institutions and multilateral organisations, our mission is to identify and investigate key trends that are likely to shape or impact the insurance industry in the future, highlighting what is at stake for the industry; develop recommendations for the industry and for policymakers; provide a platform to our members, policymakers, academics, multilateral and non-governmental organisations to discuss these trends and recommendations; reach out to global opinion leaders and influential organisations to highlight the positive contributions of insurance to better understanding risks and to building resilient and prosperous economies and societies, and thus a more sustainable world. The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics Talstrasse 70, CH-8001 Zurich Email: [email protected] | Tel: +41 44 200 49 00 | Fax: +41 44 200 49 99 Photo credits: Cover page—Markus Gebauer / Shutterstock.com December 2020 Flood Risk Management in Australia © The Geneva Association Published by The Geneva Association—International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics, Zurich. 2 www.genevaassociation.org Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Daintreep Daintreepedia
    Generously Sponsored by Daintreep June 2019 Daintreepedia Table of Contents Community Facilities.........................................................................................................................................3 Ferry..................................................................................................................................................................5 Distances – driving (approx.)............................................................................................................................7 Dining Out / Groceries / Picnic Areas...............................................................................................................8 Tours & Activities............................................................................................................................................11 Walks...............................................................................................................................................................16 Swimming........................................................................................................................................................17 Arts & Crafts....................................................................................................................................................18 Special Needs.................................................................................................................................................19 Accommodation..............................................................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Network Review Final Report
    Surface Water Network Review Final Report 16 July 2018 This publication has been compiled by Operations Support - Water, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Interpreter statement: The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this document, you can contact us within Australia on 13QGOV (13 74 68) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Surface
    [Show full text]
  • Quinkan Country QLD 2017, a Bush Blitz Survey Report
    Quinkan Country Queensland 6–17 March 2017 Bush Blitz Species Discovery Program Quinkan Country, Queensland 6–17 March 2017 What is Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a multi-million dollar partnership between the Australian Government, BHP Billiton Sustainable Communities and Earthwatch Australia to document plants and animals in selected properties across Australia. This innovative partnership harnesses the expertise of many of Australia’s top scientists from museums, herbaria, universities, and other institutions and organisations across the country. Abbreviations ABRS Australian Biological Resources Study ALA Atlas of Living Australia ANIC Australian National Insect Collection ATH Australian Tropical Herbarium CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NC Act Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) QM Queensland Museum SAM South Australian Museum UNSW University of New South Wales Page 2 of 42 Quinkan Country, Queensland 6–17 March 2017 Summary In March 2017, a Bush Blitz expedition was conducted in West Quinkan country in northern Queensland, along with several other reserves and properties in the area. The West Quinkan country is characterised by broad sandstone plateaus into which the Mossman River and its tributaries have cut deep gorges. The vegetation is dominated by forest and woodland, with unmapped patches of vine-thicket/rainforest in sheltered sites and around springs. The sandstones of the West and East Quinkan Reserves have not been affected by grazing and contain important sources of permanent water. Quinkan is well known as an area of high cultural value but its environmental value is less well understood. The complex landscape of Quinkan, consisting of tropical savanna woodland on eroded sandstone escarpments with some grassland and small patches of rainforest, and its relatively unaltered state, suggests its likelihood as an area of high biodiversity.
    [Show full text]