Sandbian) K-Bentonites in Oslo, Norway T ⁎ Eirik G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sandbian) K-Bentonites in Oslo, Norway T ⁎ Eirik G Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 520 (2019) 203–213 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo A new age model for the Ordovician (Sandbian) K-bentonites in Oslo, Norway T ⁎ Eirik G. Balloa, , Lars Eivind Auglanda, Øyvind Hammerb, Henrik H. Svensena a Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, Pb. 1028, 0316 Oslo, Norway b Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Pb. 1172, 0318 Oslo, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: During the Late Ordovician, large explosive volcanic eruptions deposited worldwide K-bentonites, including the Chronostratigraphy Millbrig and Deicke K-bentonites in North America and the Kinnekulle K-bentonite in Scandinavia. We have Sandbian-Katian boundary studied a classical locality in Oslo containing one of the most complete sections of K-bentonites in Europe. U-Pb dating In a 53 m section of Sandbian age, we discovered 33 individual K-bentonite beds, the most notable beds being Milankovitch the Kinnekulle and the upper Grimstorp K-bentonite. Magnetic susceptibility (MS) measurements on two in- Age model tervals show significant periodicity peaks interpreted as Milankovitch cycles and thus astronomically forced Kinnekulle changes in sediment supply and composition. These cycles fit remarkably well with both the expected Milankovitch periodicities for the Ordovician as well as the radiometric ages presented in this study and may represent one of the most convincing demonstrations of Milankovitch cycles from the lower Paleozoic so far. Five of the K-bentonites have been dated by high-precision chemical abrasion-thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA-TIMS) U-Pb zircon geochronology, where the Kinnekulle K-bentonite gives an age of 454.06 ± 0.43 Ma. We have integrated the new data and calculated an age model showing the sedimentation rates through the section and thereby the ages of each of the 33 K-bentonites. Using the age model, we further present a new age for the Sandbian-Katian stage boundary. The section in Oslo provides the highest resolution window into the Upper Ordovician K-bentonite succession so far and helps shed more light on the chronology of one of the most intense volcanic periods of the Paleozoic and the relationship with the global carbon cycle changes that followed. 1. Introduction recent advances in geochronological methods provide the possibility to obtain precise age constraints (Condon et al., 2007; Mattinson, 2005; The Ordovician was one of the most environmentally, biologically, Schmitz and Schoene, 2007). and climatologically dynamic periods in Earth history with events such Subduction-related island arc volcanism during the Ordovician de- as the first occurrence of land plants (Lenton et al., 2012), and the posited volcanic tephras, now preserved as K-bentonites (Huff, 2016; extensive Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE) that led to Huff et al., 2010). K-bentonites represent excellent stratigraphic mar- a surge of marine life (Servais et al., 2009; Webby et al., 2004). kers of the Phanerozoic, as they cover widespread areas (up to Moreover, a general long-term cooling trend is documented through the 2.2 × 106 km2 in Europe and 6.9 × 105 km2 in North America; Huff entire period (Nardin et al., 2011), culminating in the Hirnantian gla- et al., 2010). Sedimentary successions can record environmental, bio- ciation at the end of the period—accumulating ice sheets on the logical, and climatological data—providing a timeline of geochemical Gondwanan continent and consequently lowering of the global sea level information on these events, with interlayered K-bentonite beds (Armstrong, 2007; Brenchley et al., 1994; Herrmann et al., 2004). The working as age markers. Radiometric dating of well-preserved zircons first of the ‘Big Five’ mass extinctions of the Phanerozoic, killing about in K-bentonites is therefore an important tool in refining the geological 85% of marine species, ended the Ordovician Period (Sheehan, 2001). timescale and defining large-scale geochemical perturbations. Still, the causes of these events remain elusive (Munnecke et al., 2010). Milankovitch cycles are associated with astronomically forced The general lack of precise age determinations is a key factor in un- changes in sediment supply, composition and climate change (Elrick certainties in the cause-and-effect relationships responsible for these et al., 2013; Fang et al., 2016; Sutcliffe et al., 2000; Williams, 1991). To intervals of significant global change (Cramer et al., 2015). However, identify astronomically forced cycles, magnetic susceptibility (MS) is ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (E.G. Ballo). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.01.016 Received 1 October 2018; Received in revised form 10 January 2019; Accepted 10 January 2019 Available online 01 February 2019 0031-0182/ © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. E.G. Ballo, et al. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 520 (2019) 203–213 Fig. 1. (A) Southern Scandinavia with box showing the Oslo Region and logs from the Vollen, Sinsen and Kinnekulle localities show the Kinnekulle, lower and upper Grimstorp K-bentonite beds illustrating an apparent westward increase in sedimentation rate. The map is adapted from Svensen et al. (2015). (B) Simplified geological map of the Oslo Region showing the studied localities at Sinsen (including the Storoveien locality; 59°56′13″ N, 10°47′13″ E), Carl Berner (59°55′39″ N, 10°46′48″ E) and Vollen (59°48′11.4″ N, 10°29′12.6″ E). The map is modified from Lutro and Nordgulen (2008). (C) Satellite overview of the Sinsen area showing the main Sinsen section (black box), the stratigraphic up direction (arrow) and strike and dip of the bedding. The image is adapted from Google Maps (2017). frequently used, as it is a low-cost logging parameter that allows for 2. Upper Ordovician stratigraphy of the Oslo Region field measurements (Svensen et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2016; Plado et al., 2016). Climate-driven changes in weathering, erosion and sea level lead In the Oslo Region, the Ordovician successions are characterized by to a variation in sediment influx, reflected in the concentration of for epicontinental, subtidal marine depositional environments, as de- instance iron (Ellwood et al., 2000). Combining high-precision radio- scribed in classical contributions by Kjerulf (1857) and Kiær (1897), metric ages with cyclostratigraphic spectral analyses may test whether and summarized by Nielsen (2004), Owen et al. (1990), and Worsley sediments provide a record of astronomical forcing. and Nakrem (2008). The Middle Ordovician stratigraphy is dominated The first combined radiometric dating and cyclostratigraphic study by shales of the Tøyen and Elnes formations separated by the massive of K-bentonites in Norway was conducted by Svensen et al. (2015) at limestones of the Huk Formation (Bruton et al., 2010; Fig. 2). The Vollen south of Oslo (Fig. 1B). Svensen et al. (2015) dated two of the Upper Ordovician is characterized by the alternation of shales (e.g. key K-bentonites (the Kinnekulle and the upper Grimstorp K-bentonite) Arnestad and Nakkholmen formations) and nodular and tabular lime- and identified cyclicities interpreted to represent the short eccentricity stones (e.g. Vollen and Frognerkilen formations; Bjørlykke, 1974; (100 kyr) and obliquity (30.3 kyr) components. However, as the out- Bruton et al., 2010; Möller and Kvingan, 1988; Fig. 2). The Ordovician crop at Vollen is limited to three K-bentonites, a high-resolution age successions in Oslo are found within the Oslo Graben, a Carboniferous model was not calculated. to Permian rift structure extending about 200 km from the Skien-Lan- The aim of this study is to provide a new age model for this part of gesund area in the south to the Mjøsa district in the north (e.g. the Ordovician stratigraphy, based on a section in Oslo. We have re- Neumann et al., 1992; Størmer, 1953; Sundvoll and Larsen, 1994). visited the classic locality of Hagemann and Spjeldnæs (1955), re- The K-bentonites in this study are all located in the Arnestad vealing 33 K-bentonite beds of which 11 are not previously reported. Formation, predominantly consisting of thick shale beds (30–40 cm), New high-precision ages of the K-bentonites may help constrain the interlayered by thin bedded or nodular horizons of early diagenetic relationships between large explosive eruptions and environmental calcareous limestone rarely exceeding 10–20 cm in thickness. In the changes. upper part of the formation, the limestone horizons develop from 204 E.G. Ballo, et al. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 520 (2019) 203–213 Fig. 2. Global distribution of Middle and Upper Ordovician K-bentonites modified from Huff (2008) using ages from Gradstein et al. (2012). nodular to massive (Owen et al., 1990). A westward shallowing en- two beds originated from different arc settings. The large magnitude of vironment is suggested by faunal and sedimentological indicators these Ordovician volcanic eruptions has brought up questions about (Hansen and Harper, 2006), which is reflected in a westward increase their potential climatic and environmental effects. Perrier et al. (2012) in sedimentation rate (Fig. 1A). suggested that the Kinnekulle K-bentonite was associated with re- The position of the Sandbian-Katian boundary in the Oslo Region organization of ostracod assemblages and strong, long-term perturba- has been discussed by several authors
Recommended publications
  • Climate Change and the Selective Signature of the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction
    Climate change and the selective signature of the Late Ordovician mass extinction Seth Finnegana,b,1, Noel A. Heimc, Shanan E. Petersc, and Woodward W. Fischera aDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125; bDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, 1005 Valley Life Sciences Bldg #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720; and cDepartment of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 West Dayton Street, Madison, WI 53706 Edited by Richard K. Bambach, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., and accepted by the Editorial Board March 6, 2012 (received for review October 14, 2011) Selectivity patterns provide insights into the causes of ancient ex- sedimentary record (common cause hypothesis) (14). For the tinction events. The Late Ordovician mass extinction was related LOME, it is useful to split common cause into two hypotheses. to Gondwanan glaciation; however, it is still unclear whether ele- The eustatic common cause hypothesis postulates that Gondwa- vated extinction rates were attributable to record failure, habitat nan glaciation drove the extinction by lowering eustatic sea level, loss, or climatic cooling. We examined Middle Ordovician-Early thereby reducing the overall area of shallow marine habitats, Silurian North American fossil occurrences within a spatiotempo- reorganizing habitat mosaics, and disrupting larval dispersal cor- rally explicit stratigraphic framework that allowed us to quantify ridors (16–18). The climatic common cause hypothesis postulates rock record effects on a per-taxon basis and assay the interplay of that climate cooling, in addition to being ultimately responsible macrostratigraphic and macroecological variables in determining for sea-level drawdown and attendant habitat losses, had a direct extinction risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Front Shift and Atmospheric CO During the Glacial Maximum of the Early Paleozoic Icehouse
    Polar front shift and atmospheric CO2 during the glacial maximum of the Early Paleozoic Icehouse Thijs R. A. Vandenbrouckea,b,c,1,2, Howard A. Armstronga,1, Mark Williamsd,e,1, Florentin Parisf, Jan A. Zalasiewiczd, Koen Sabbeg, Jaak Nõlvakh, Thomas J. Challandsa,i, Jacques Verniersb, and Thomas Servaisc aPalaeoClimate Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom; bResearch Unit Palaeontology, Department of Geology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; cGéosystèmes, Université Lille 1, Formation de Recherche en Evolution 3298 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Avenue Paul Langevin, bâtiment SN5, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France; dDepartment of Geology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom; eBritish Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom; fGéosciences, Université de Rennes I, Unité Mixte de Recherche 6118 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes-cedex, France; gProtistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; hInstitute of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia; and iTotal E&P UK Limited, Geoscience Research Centre, Crawpeel Road, Aberdeen AB12 3FG, United Kingdom Edited by Jeffrey Kiehl, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, and accepted by the Editorial Board July 1, 2010 (received for review March 16, 2010) Our new data address the paradox of Late Ordovician glaciation PAL (5). A GCM experiment parameterized with the same p × under supposedly high CO2 (8 to 22 PAL: preindustrial atmo- pCO2 value, high relative sea level, and a modern equator-to-pole spheric level).
    [Show full text]
  • Facies, Phosphate, and Fossil Preservation Potential Across a Lower Cambrian Carbonate Shelf, Arrowie Basin, South Australia
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 533 (2019) 109200 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Facies, phosphate, and fossil preservation potential across a Lower Cambrian T carbonate shelf, Arrowie Basin, South Australia ⁎ Sarah M. Jacqueta,b, , Marissa J. Bettsc,d, John Warren Huntleya, Glenn A. Brockb,d a Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA b Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia c Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia d Early Life Institute and Department of Geology, State Key Laboratory for Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, Xi'an 710069, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The efects of sedimentological, depositional and taphonomic processes on preservation potential of Cambrian Microfacies small shelly fossils (SSF) have important implications for their utility in biostratigraphy and high-resolution Calcareous correlation. To investigate the efects of these processes on fossil occurrence, detailed microfacies analysis, Organophosphatic biostratigraphic data, and multivariate analyses are integrated from an exemplar stratigraphic section Taphonomy intersecting a suite of lower Cambrian carbonate palaeoenvironments in the northern Flinders Ranges, South Biominerals Australia. The succession deepens upsection, across a low-gradient shallow-marine shelf. Six depositional Facies Hardgrounds Sequences are identifed ranging from protected (FS1) and open (FS2) shelf/lagoonal systems, high-energy inner ramp shoal complex (FS3), mid-shelf (FS4), mid- to outer-shelf (FS5) and outer-shelf (FS6) environments. Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling ordination and two-way cluster analysis reveal an underlying bathymetric gradient as the main control on the distribution of SSFs.
    [Show full text]
  • International Stratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL STRATIGRAPHIC CHART ICS International Commission on Stratigraphy Ma Ma Ma Ma Era Era Era Era Age Age Age Age Age Eon Eon Age Eon Age Eon Stage Stage Stage GSSP GSSP GSSA GSSP GSSP Series Epoch Series Epoch Series Epoch Period Period Period Period System System System System Erathem Erathem Erathem Erathem Eonothem Eonothem Eonothem 145.5 ±4.0 Eonothem 359.2 ±2.5 542 Holocene Tithonian Famennian Ediacaran 0.0117 150.8 ±4.0 Upper 374.5 ±2.6 Neo- ~635 Upper Upper Kimmeridgian Frasnian Cryogenian 0.126 ~ 155.6 385.3 ±2.6 proterozoic 850 “Ionian” Oxfordian Givetian Tonian Pleistocene 0.781 161.2 ±4.0 Middle 391.8 ±2.7 1000 Calabrian Callovian Eifelian Stenian Quaternary 1.806 164.7 ±4.0 397.5 ±2.7 Meso- 1200 Gelasian Bathonian Emsian Ectasian proterozoic 2.588 Middle 167.7 ±3.5 Devonian 407.0 ±2.8 1400 Piacenzian Bajocian Lower Pragian Calymmian Pliocene 3.600 171.6 ±3.0 411.2 ±2.8 1600 Zanclean Aalenian Lochkovian Statherian Jurassic 5.332 175.6 ±2.0 416.0 ±2.8 Proterozoic 1800 Messinian Toarcian Pridoli Paleo- Orosirian 7.246 183.0 ±1.5 418.7 ±2.7 2050 Tortonian Pliensbachian Ludfordian proterozoic Rhyacian 11.608 Lower 189.6 ±1.5 Ludlow 421.3 ±2.6 2300 Serravallian Sinemurian Gorstian Siderian Miocene 13.82 196.5 ±1.0 422.9 ±2.5 2500 Neogene Langhian Hettangian Homerian 15.97 199.6 ±0.6 Wenlock 426.2 ±2.4 Neoarchean Burdigalian M e s o z i c Rhaetian Sheinwoodian 20.43 203.6 ±1.5 428.2 ±2.3 2800 Aquitanian Upper Norian Silurian Telychian 23.03 216.5 ±2.0 436.0 ±1.9 P r e c a m b i n P Mesoarchean C e n o z i c Chattian Carnian
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE V
    GSA GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE v. 4.0 CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST HIST. ANOM. (Ma) ANOM. CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 66.0 541 CALABRIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE* 1.8 31 C31 MAASTRICHTIAN 252 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 Lopin- 254 32 C32 72.1 635 2A C2A PIACENZIAN WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 3.6 gian 33 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN CAPITANIAN NEOPRO- 5 C3 CAMPANIAN Guada- 265 750 CRYOGENIAN 5.3 80 C33 WORDIAN TEROZOIC 3A MESSINIAN LATE lupian 269 C3A 83.6 ROADIAN 272 850 7.2 SANTONIAN 4 KUNGURIAN C4 86.3 279 TONIAN CONIACIAN 280 4A Cisura- C4A TORTONIAN 90 89.8 1000 1000 PERMIAN ARTINSKIAN 10 5 TURONIAN lian C5 93.9 290 SAKMARIAN STENIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 296 SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 ASSELIAN 299 5A 100 100 300 GZHELIAN 1200 C5A 13.8 LATE 304 KASIMOVIAN 307 1250 MESOPRO- 15 LANGHIAN ECTASIAN 5B C5B ALBIAN MIDDLE MOSCOVIAN 16.0 TEROZOIC 5C C5C 110 VANIAN 315 PENNSYL- 1400 EARLY 5D C5D MIOCENE 113 320 BASHKIRIAN 323 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 1500 CALYMMIAN 6 C6 APTIAN LATE 20 120 331 6A C6A 20.4 EARLY 1600 M0r 126 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 MIDDLE VISEAN MISSIS- M3 BARREMIAN SIPPIAN STATHERIAN C6C 23.0 6C 130 M5 CRETACEOUS 131 347 1750 HAUTERIVIAN 7 C7 CARBONIFEROUS EARLY TOURNAISIAN 1800 M10 134 25 7A C7A 359 8 C8 CHATTIAN VALANGINIAN M12 360 140 M14 139 FAMENNIAN OROSIRIAN 9 C9 M16 28.1 M18 BERRIASIAN 2000 PROTEROZOIC 10 C10 LATE
    [Show full text]
  • (Floian) Conodont Fauna from the Eastern Cordillera of Peru (Central Andean Basin) Geologica Acta: an International Earth Science Journal, Vol
    Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal ISSN: 1695-6133 [email protected] Universitat de Barcelona España GUTIÉRREZ-MARCO, J.C.; ALBANESI, G.L.; SARMIENTO, G.N.; CARLOTTO, V. An Early Ordovician (Floian) Conodont Fauna from the Eastern Cordillera of Peru (Central Andean Basin) Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal, vol. 6, núm. 2, junio, 2008, pp. 147-160 Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=50513115004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Geologica Acta, Vol.6, Nº 2, June 2008, 147-160 DOI: 10.1344/105.000000248 Available online at www.geologica-acta.com An Early Ordovician (Floian) Conodont Fauna from the Eastern Cordillera of Peru (Central Andean Basin) 1 2 1 3,4 J.C. GUTIÉRREZ-MARCO G.L. ALBANESI G.N. SARMIENTO and V. CARLOTTO 1 Instituto de Geología Económica (CSIC-UCM). Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas 28040 Madrid, Spain. Gutiérrez-Marco E-mail: [email protected] Sarmiento E-mail: [email protected] 2 CONICET-CICTERRA, Museo de Paleontología Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Casilla de Correo 1598, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] 3 INGEMMET Avenida Canadá 1740, San Borja, Lima, Peru. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Departamento de Geología, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco Avda. de la Cultura 733, Cuzco, Perú ABSTRACT Late Floian conodonts are recorded from a thin limestone lens intercalated in the lower part of the San José For- mation at the Carcel Puncco section (Inambari River), Eastern Cordillera of Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2018/08 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age GSSP GSSP GSSP GSSP EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon Erathem / Era System / Period GSSA age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 541.0 ±1.0 U/L Meghalayan 0.0042 Holocene M Northgrippian 0.0082 Tithonian Ediacaran L/E Greenlandian 152.1 ±0.9 ~ 635 Upper 0.0117 Famennian Neo- 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian Callovian 1000 Quaternary Gelasian 166.1 ±1.2 2.58 Bathonian 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Middle 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Bajocian 170.3 ±1.4 Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Devonian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Proterozoic Neogene Sinemurian Langhian 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- 2050 Burdigalian Hettangian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 27.82 Gorstian
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2014/02 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 850 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.62 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian
    [Show full text]
  • Terminal Ordovician Carbon Isotope Stratigraphy and Glacioeustatic Sea-Level Change Across Anticosti Island (Québec, Canada)
    Terminal Ordovician carbon isotope stratigraphy and glacioeustatic sea-level change across Anticosti Island (Québec, Canada) David S. Jones1,†, David A. Fike1, Seth Finnegan2, Woodward W. Fischer2, Daniel P. Schrag3, and Dwight McCay1 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA 2Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 100-23, Pasadena, California 91125, USA 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, 20 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA ABSTRACT approach provides evidence for the diachro- picture (Runkel et al., 2010). The biological crisis neity of the oncolite bed and Becscie lime- that accompanied the glaciation was the second Globally documented carbon isotope ex- stones; the former transgresses from west greatest mass extinction in the marine fossil cursions provide time-varying signals that to east, and the latter progrades from east rec ord (Sheehan, 2001; Bambach et al., 2004), can be used for high-resolution stratigraphic to west. The sea-level curve consistent with depleting the enormous diversity of marine or- correlation. We report detailed inorganic and our sequence-stratigraphic model indicates ganisms that had evolved during the Ordovician organic carbon isotope curves from carbonate that glacioeustatic sea-level changes and the Radiation (Webby et al., 2004). Marine carbon- rocks of the Ellis Bay and Becscie Formations positive carbon isotope excursion were not ate rocks deposited at the time preserve records spanning the Ordovician-Silurian boundary perfectly coupled. Although the start of the of a global disturbance to the carbon cycle rep- 13 on Anticosti Island, Québec, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleogeographic Maps Earth History
    History of the Earth Age AGE Eon Era Period Period Epoch Stage Paleogeographic Maps Earth History (Ma) Era (Ma) Holocene Neogene Quaternary* Pleistocene Calabrian/Gelasian Piacenzian 2.6 Cenozoic Pliocene Zanclean Paleogene Messinian 5.3 L Tortonian 100 Cretaceous Serravallian Miocene M Langhian E Burdigalian Jurassic Neogene Aquitanian 200 23 L Chattian Triassic Oligocene E Rupelian Permian 34 Early Neogene 300 L Priabonian Bartonian Carboniferous Cenozoic M Eocene Lutetian 400 Phanerozoic Devonian E Ypresian Silurian Paleogene L Thanetian 56 PaleozoicOrdovician Mesozoic Paleocene M Selandian 500 E Danian Cambrian 66 Maastrichtian Ediacaran 600 Campanian Late Santonian 700 Coniacian Turonian Cenomanian Late Cretaceous 100 800 Cryogenian Albian 900 Neoproterozoic Tonian Cretaceous Aptian Early 1000 Barremian Hauterivian Valanginian 1100 Stenian Berriasian 146 Tithonian Early Cretaceous 1200 Late Kimmeridgian Oxfordian 161 Callovian Mesozoic 1300 Ectasian Bathonian Middle Bajocian Aalenian 176 1400 Toarcian Jurassic Mesoproterozoic Early Pliensbachian 1500 Sinemurian Hettangian Calymmian 200 Rhaetian 1600 Proterozoic Norian Late 1700 Statherian Carnian 228 1800 Ladinian Late Triassic Triassic Middle Anisian 1900 245 Olenekian Orosirian Early Induan Changhsingian 251 2000 Lopingian Wuchiapingian 260 Capitanian Guadalupian Wordian/Roadian 2100 271 Kungurian Paleoproterozoic Rhyacian Artinskian 2200 Permian Cisuralian Sakmarian Middle Permian 2300 Asselian 299 Late Gzhelian Kasimovian 2400 Siderian Middle Moscovian Penn- sylvanian Early Bashkirian
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician Graptolites from the Basal Part of the Palaeozoic Transgressive Sequence in the Karadere Area, Zonguldak Terrane, NW Turkey
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2014, 63, 4, 227–232 doi: 10.3176/earth.2014.23 Ordovician graptolites from the basal part of the Palaeozoic transgressive sequence in the Karadere area, Zonguldak Terrane, NW Turkey M. Cemal Göncüoglua, Valeri Sachanskib, Juan Carlos Gutiérrez-Marcoc and Cengiz Okuyucud a METU, Department of Geological Engineering, 06531 Ankara,Turkey; [email protected] b UMG ‘St. Ivan Rilski’, Department of Geology and Geo-Information, Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; [email protected] c Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM), José Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] d Selcuk University, Department of Geological Engineering, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey; [email protected] Received 10 June 2014, accepted 15 September 2014 Abstract. The Karadere area to the east of Safranbolu in NW Anatolia is one of the very few localities in Turkey where the contact between the Cadomian basement and the Lower Palaeozoic transgressive succession is well exposed. The Ordovician graptolite Rhabdinopora flabelliformis (Eichwald) ssp. was found in the basal part of the Bakacak Formation, indicating an Early to early Late Tremadocian age for the beginning of the Palaeozoic transgression in the Zonguldak terrane. A few metres above this occurrence, another horizon contains Paradelograptus cf. antiquus (T. S. Hall), which mainly ranges into the Late Tremadocian. Higher up in the Ordovician succession, a new graptolite bed confirms an early Darriwilian (Dw1) age for the middle part of the Karadere Formation with the occurrence of the biozonal index Levisograptus austrodentatus (Harris & Keble) and the first record of Tetragraptus cor (Strandmark) in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Geologic Time Scale Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Precambrian Magnetic Magnetic Bdy
    2009 GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST. HIST. ANOM. ANOM. (Ma) CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 65.5 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 542 CALABRIAN MAASTRICHTIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE 1.8 31 C31 251 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 70.6 254 2A PIACENZIAN 32 C32 L 630 C2A 3.6 WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN 33 CAMPANIAN CAPITANIAN 5 C3 5.3 266 750 NEOPRO- CRYOGENIAN 80 C33 M WORDIAN MESSINIAN LATE 268 TEROZOIC 3A C3A 83.5 ROADIAN 7.2 SANTONIAN 271 85.8 KUNGURIAN 850 4 276 C4 CONIACIAN 280 4A 89.3 ARTINSKIAN TONIAN C4A L TORTONIAN 90 284 TURONIAN PERMIAN 10 5 93.5 E 1000 1000 C5 SAKMARIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 297 99.6 ASSELIAN STENIAN SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 299.0 5A 100 300 GZELIAN C5A 13.8 M KASIMOVIAN 304 1200 PENNSYL- 306 1250 15 5B LANGHIAN ALBIAN MOSCOVIAN MESOPRO- C5B VANIAN 312 ECTASIAN 5C 16.0 110 BASHKIRIAN TEROZOIC C5C 112 5D C5D MIOCENE 320 318 1400 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 326 6 C6 APTIAN 20 120 1500 CALYMMIAN E 20.4 6A C6A EARLY MISSIS- M0r 125 VISEAN 1600 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 SIPPIAN M3 BARREMIAN C6C 23.0 345 6C CRETACEOUS 130 M5 130 STATHERIAN CARBONIFEROUS TOURNAISIAN 7 C7 HAUTERIVIAN 1750 25 7A M10 C7A 136 359 8 C8 L CHATTIAN M12 VALANGINIAN 360 L 1800 140 M14 140 9 C9 M16 FAMENNIAN BERRIASIAN M18 PROTEROZOIC OROSIRIAN 10 C10 28.4 145.5 M20 2000 30 11 C11 TITHONIAN 374 PALEOPRO- 150 M22 2050 12 E RUPELIAN
    [Show full text]