Porn Stars That Contracted Hiv
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Making Mandingo: Racial Archetypes, Pornography, and Black Male Subjectivity
Making Mandingo: Racial Archetypes, Pornography, and Black Male Subjectivity By Phillip Samuels © 2019 M.A., University of Kansas, 2007 B.A., Emporia State University, 2004 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Communication Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Dr. Dorothy Pennington Dr. Scott Harris Dr. Beth Innocenti Dr. Jeffery Jarman Dr. Randal Maurice Jelks _____________________________ Dr. Robert McDonald Date Defended: 6 December 2019 ii Acceptance Page Making Mandingo: Racial Archetypes, Pornography, and Black Male Subjectivity The dissertation committee for Phillip Samuels certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Chair: Dr. Dorthy Pennington Date Approved: iii Abstract Mandingo is a reference to a longstanding myth in American culture, that black men have an unquenchable desire for white woman. I will argue that Mandingo is an example of a racial archetype. Racial archetypes are specific images of a long-standing stereotypes. Mandingo is one such archetype. Mandingo conjures up an entire history of the rhetoric of miscegenation. For some it is the excitement of the big black cock (BBC) and crossing the color line, but for most blacks it invokes images of lynching, slavery, and police brutality brought on by the fear of black men while at the same time trafficking in a prurient landscape of American racial and sexual relations. Whether through words, pictures or movies, the Mandingo has become a dominant archetype in the pantheon of the African American experience. Charting the Mandingo emergence and articulation is critical project to discern how these rhetorical markers are part of a larger mythic narrative. -
The Myth of Obsolete Obscenity (20160511) (Do Not Delete) 5/11/2016 1:33 PM
Kinsley, The Myth of Obsolete Obscenity (20160511) (Do Not Delete) 5/11/2016 1:33 PM THE MYTH OF OBSOLETE OBSCENITY JENNIFER M. KINSLEY* INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 609 I. BACKGROUND................................................................................ 610 A. Federal Obscenity Laws ................................................... 610 1. Miller v. California..................................................... 611 2. Smith v. California ..................................................... 612 3. Pope v. Illinois ............................................................ 612 B. State Obscenity Laws and Local Ordinances ................... 612 C. Current Scholarship on Obscenity Prosecutions .............. 614 II. OBSCENITY PROSECUTIONS FROM 2000 TO PRESENT .................... 615 A. Federal Prosecutions ....................................................... 615 1. The Bush Administration Prosecutions: Cases Initiated and Concluded from 2003 to 2008 ............. 617 a. Extreme Associates ............................................... 617 b. The Ragsdales ....................................................... 618 c. Patrick J. O’Malley ............................................... 618 d. Jeffrey Kilbride and James Schaffer ..................... 619 e. Karen Fletcher ....................................................... 620 f. Adult DVD Empire................................................ 621 g. The Harb Cousins ................................................ -
The 2008 Federal Obscenity Conviction of Paul Little and What It Reveals About Obscenity Law and Prosecutions
The 2008 Federal Obscenity Conviction of Paul Little and What It Reveals About Obscenity Law and Prosecutions Robert D. Richards* and Clay Calvert** ABSTRACT This Article provides an inside perspective on the 2008 obscenity trial and conviction of veteran adult movie producer Paul Little, who is known in the adult industry as Max Hardcore. Little was sentenced by a federal judge to nearly four years in prison after a twelve-person jury in Tampa, Florida found him guilty of multiple counts of selling and distributing obscene content via the U.S. Mail and Internet. The Article centers around comments and remarks drawn from four exclusive interviews conducted in person by the authors with: (1) Jeffrey Douglas, the California-based attorney who represented and defended Paul Little in United States v. Little; (2) H. Louis Sirkin, the Ohio-based attorney who represented and defended the corporate entities controlled by Paul Little in United States v. Little; (3) Mark Kernes, Senior Editor of Adult Video News, a leading adult entertainment industry trade publication, and the journalist who covered the trial of Paul Little; and (4) Larry Flynt, the publisher of Hustler magazine and head of the LFP, Inc. adult entertainment * Distinguished Professor of Journalism & Law and Founding Co-Director of the Pennsylvania Center for the First Amendment, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. J.D., The American University, 1987; M.A., Communication, The Pennsylvania State University, 1984; B.A., Communication, The Pennsylvania State University, 1983. Member, State Bar of Pennsylvania. The authors thank Thomas Markey and Patrick Hanifin of The Pennsylvania State University for reviewing an early draft of this Article. -
Alternative Pornographies, Regulatory Fantasies and Resistance Politics
Alternative Pornographies, Regulatory Fantasies and Resistance Politics Zahra Zsuzsanna Stardust Bachelor of Arts (History) (University of Sydney) Bachelor of Laws (Hons) (University of Sydney) Master of Arts (Gender and Cultural Studies) (University of Sydney) Thesis submitted to fulfil requirements of a Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Arts and Media at the University of New South Wales. March 2019. Supervised by Professor Ramaswami Harindranath, Dr Daniel Joyce and Professor Kath Albury. 1 Contents Dissertation sheet ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Originality Statement ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Inclusion of Publications Statement .................................................................................................................. 7 Copyright and Authenticity Statement .............................................................................................................. 8 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Relevant Publications and Presentations Arising from this Research .............................................................. -
Dk3608 C000 1..18
3608_title 7/6/06 9:52 AM Page 1 Anatomy,The Physiology, Vulva and Pathology Edited by MirandaThe Procter & Gamble A. CompanyFarage Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. HowardUniversity of California I. Maibach School of Medicine San Francisco, California, U.S.A. New York London Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. 270 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 © 2006 by Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. Informa Healthcare is an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-8493-3608-2 (Hardcover) International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-8493-3608-9 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reprinted material is quoted with permission, and sources are indicated. A wide variety of references are listed. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and the publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or for the conse- quences of their use. No part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopy- ing, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without writ- ten permission from the publishers. For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www. copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC) 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. -
SUMMARY PUBLIC MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING/BUSINESS MEETING February 18, 2016 Oakland, California
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS BOARD 2520 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95833 (916) 274-5721 FAX (916) 274-5743 Website address www.dir.ca.gov/oshsb SUMMARY PUBLIC MEETING/PUBLIC HEARING/BUSINESS MEETING February 18, 2016 Oakland, California I. PUBLIC MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS Chairman Dave Thomas called the Public Meeting of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (Board) to order at 10:04 a.m., February 18, 2016, in the Auditorium of the Harris State Building, Oakland, California. ATTENDANCE Board Members Present Board Member Absent Dave Thomas Laura Stock Dr. Robert Blink David Harrison Patty Quinlan Barbara Smisko rd Staff Boa Division of Occupational Safety and Health Marley Hart, Executive Officer Juliann Sum, Chief Mike Manieri, Eric Berg, Deputy Chief of Health Principal Safety Engineer Peter Healy, Legal Counsel David Kernazitskas, Senior Safety Engineer Sarah Money, Executive Assistant Others Present Lyra Louvel Eric Paul Leue, Free Speech Coalition Syren De Mer Julia Ann Tavella James Bartholet, Actor Jodi Taylor, Performer David Jones, AGC of CA Tho Do, Unite Here Jenny Huang, Unite Here Alejandro Negrete, Unite Here Erinn Coter, Unite Here Local 2 Maggie Mayhem, FSC Adam Cohen, AHF Whitney Engeran-Cordova, AHF Abella Danger Victoria Colliver, San Francisco Chronicle Damien Michaels, Performer Mark Kernes, Adult Video News Mike Chase Veronica Gonis, Performer Board Meeting Minutes February 18, 2016 Page 2 of 20 Maurice Theodre McKnight Jiz Lee, Jiz Lee, LLC Freya French, Performer Tarantino XXX, Performer Brad Knight, Performer Eden Alexander, Performer Jessica Drake, Wicked Pictures Brad Armstrong, Wicked Pictures Brad Pelletier, KCO Radio Adam Robinson, Falcon Studios Kevin B. -
DOSH Evaluation
State of California Department of Industrial Relations Division of Occupational Safety and Health Memorandum Date: September 11, 2019 To: Christina Shupe, Executive Officer Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board 2520 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 350 Sacramento, CA 95833 From: Eric Berg, Deputy Chief Research and Standards Unit Division of Occupational Safety and Health Re: Evaluation of Petition 576 to Amend Title 8 to Protect Employees in the Adult Film Industry 1.0 INTRODUCTION On April 24, 2019, the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) received a petition from an anonymous person. The petitioner requests protections for employee performers in the adult film industry (adult film workers) against violence, including sexual assault, and sexually transmitted infections. Labor Code Section 142.2 permits interested persons to propose new or revised standards concerning occupational safety and health, and requires the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (Standards Board) to consider such proposals and render a decision no later than six months following receipt. California Labor Code section 147 requires the Standards Board to refer to Cal/OSHA for evaluation any proposed occupational safety and health standard. Cal/OSHA is required to submit a report on the proposal within 60 days of receipt. 2.0 REGULATORY CHANGES REQUESTED BY THE PETITIONER TO PROTECT ADULT FILM WORKERS The petitioner did not provide exact language for recommended changes to title 8. However, the petitioner did provide specifics on what protections they believe are needed for adult film workers, including the following: 2.1 A Cal/OSHA hotline specifically for adult film workers to file anonymous complaints. -
Porn Work, Heather Berg Dissertation Final
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by eScholarship - University of California UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Porn Work: Adult Film at the Point of Production Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7x21k82s Author Berg, Heather R. Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Porn Work: Adult Film at the Point of Production A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Feminist Studies by Heather R. Berg Committee in charge: Professor Leila Rupp, Co-chair Professor Mireille Miller-Young, Co-chair Professor Eileen Boris Professor Constance Penley June 2016 The dissertation of Heather R. Berg is approved _____________________________________________ Eileen Boris _____________________________________________ Constance Penley _____________________________________________ Leila Rupp, Co-Chair _____________________________________________ Mireille Miller-Young, Co-Chair June 2016 Porn Work: Adult Film at the Point of Production Copyright © 2016 by Heather R. Berg iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply grateful for the support and solidarity that have sustained and inspired me throughout this process. Often, when new scholars I meet ask who my mentors are, and I tell them, they exclaim, “you’re so lucky!” It’s true. Warm thanks to Leila Rupp for her generosity of spirit, unflagging support, and bone-dry wit. Guiding me through questions ranging from how to respond to a reader’s report to which shoes to wear to a porn convention, Leila has been here every step of the way. -
Spring 2021 TE TA UN S E ST TH at I F E V a O O E L F a DITAT DEUS
Commencement 2021 Spring 2021 TE TA UN S E ST TH AT I F E V A O O E L F A DITAT DEUS N A E R R S I O Z T S O A N Z E I A R I T G R Y A 1912 1885 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT AND CONVOCATION PROGRAM Spring 2021 May 3, 2021 THE NATIONAL ANTHEM CONTENTS THE STAR-SPANGLED BANNER The National Anthem and O say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, Arizona State University Alma Mater ................................. 2 What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming? Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight Letter of Congratulations from the Arizona Board of Regents ............... 5 O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming? History of Honorary Degrees .............................................. 6 And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there. Past Honorary Degree Recipients .......................................... 6 O say does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave Conferring of Doctoral Degrees ............................................ 9 O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave? Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law Convocation ....................... 29 ALMA MATER Conferring of Masters Degrees ............................................ 36 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Craig and Barbara Barrett Honors College ................................102 Where the bold saguaros Moeur Award ............................................................137 Raise their arms on high, Praying strength for brave tomorrows Graduation with Academic Recognition ..................................157 From the western sky; Summa Cum Laude, 157 Where eternal mountains Magna Cum Laude, 175 Kneel at sunset’s gate, Cum Laude, 186 Here we hail thee, Alma Mater, Arizona State. -
Free Speech & the Internet
FREE SPEECH & THE INTERNET FALA WINTER MEETING, 2010 By: J. D. OBENBERGER J.D. OBENBERGER AND ASSOCIATES XXXLAW® www.xxxlaw.com 1. Commmunity Standards Cases THE NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT INTERNET OBSCENITY MUST BE JUDGED BY NATIONAL COUMMUNIT STANDARDS – THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AND A TRIAL JUDGE IN DC DECLINE TO FOLLOW THE NINTH CIRUIT A constellation of decisions in three cases addressed the application of community standards to the first and second fork of the Miller Test with respect to Internet content against defense contentions that national standards must be applied: United States v. Kilbride, 584 F3d 1240, 2009 WL 3448360, 2009 ILRWeb (P&F) 2877, 28 ILR (P&F) 376 (9th Cir., 2009)1. United States v. Little, No. 08-15964, 2010 WL 357933, 2010 ILRWeb (P&F) 1207, (11th Cir., February 2, 2010) (Unpublished, per curiam) United States v. Stagliano, Memorandum Opinion, No. 1:08-cr-00093-RJL, Criminal Action No. 08-93 (D.D.C., Feb. 19, 2010). 1 Kilbride is also treated below regarding constitutional challenge to the CAN SPAM Act. Copyright 2010 J. D. Obenberger 1 No claim of copyright is made as to the text of any court document quoted nor any publication of the United States Government. A. Kilbride FACTS Jeffrey Kilbride and his co-defendant were indicted and tried in Phoenix with respect to the following counts: Conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1037(a)(3) through fraud in connection with electronic mail; violation of § 1037(a)(3) and (a)(4) through such fraud; interstate transportation of obscene materials in violation of 18 U.S.C. -
Condom Sense: Regulating and Reforming Performer Health & Safety in the Adult Film Industry Chris Motyl
Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal Volume 32 | Issue 1 Article 6 1-1-2014 Condom Sense: Regulating and Reforming Performer Health & Safety in the Adult Film Industry Chris Motyl Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Motyl, Chris (2014) "Condom Sense: Regulating and Reforming Performer Health & Safety in the Adult Film Industry," Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal: Vol. 32: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol32/iss1/6 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Motyl: Condom Sense: Regulating and Reforming Performer Health & Safety Condom Sense: Regulating and Reforming Performer Health & Safety in the Adult Film Industry' "The result of this unsafe work environment is a public health crisis .. .2 I. INTRODUCTION On August 21, 2013, adult film actress Cameron Bay announced her recent infection with human immunodeficiency virus ("HIV")' at a Hollywood press conference coordinated by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation4 ("AHF").' Surrounded by members of the media and other adult film actors, Bay emotionally recounted the last scene she performed in at a public bar in San Francisco for internet pornography company Kink.com. 6 While filming a sex scene without the use of a condom, Bay was exposed to a bleeding cut on the genitalia of her unidentified co-star.7 Despite the male performer's open wound, which elevated the already obvious and inherent hazards of unprotected sex, 1. -
Marchforourlives: Mobilization of a Gun Violence Prevention
#MARCHFOROURLIVES: MOBILIZATION OF A GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION MOVEMENT ON TWITTER by Rachel L. Phillips, B.S. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts with a Major in Sociology May 2019 Committee Members: Nathan Pino, Chair David Dietrich Jo Ann Carson COPYRIGHT by Rachel L. Phillips 2019 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Rachel L. Phillips, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. DEDICATION First and foremost, this work is dedicated to the seventeen victims of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas shooting on February 14, 2018: Alyssa Alhadeff, Scott Beigel, Martin Duque, Nicholas Dworet, Aaron Feis, Jaime Guttenberg, Chris Hixon, Luke Hoyer, Cara Loughran, Gina Montalto, Joaquin Oliver, Alaina Petty, Meadow Pollack, Helena Ramsay, Alex Schachter, Carmen Schentrup, and Peter Wang. You will not be forgotten. I would also like to dedicate this to the organizers of March for Our Lives for giving me the inspiration to tackle the issue of mass gun violence. Thank you for your courage. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my husband John for supporting me and encouraging me throughout this project.