Objectives in the Library’S Strategic Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Barriers to Initiation of Open Source Software Projects in Research Libraries
Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2016-05-01 Barriers to Initiation of Open Source Software Projects in Research Libraries Jason Curtis Thacker Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Thacker, Jason Curtis, "Barriers to Initiation of Open Source Software Projects in Research Libraries" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 5879. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5879 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Barriers to Initiation of Open Source Software Projects in Research Libraries Jason Curtis Thacker A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Christophe Giraud-Carrier, Chair Parris Egbert Bryan Morse Department of Computer Science Brigham Young University May 2016 Copyright © 2016 Jason Curtis Thacker All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Barriers to Initiation of Open Source Software Projects in Research Libraries Jason Curtis Thacker Department of Computer Science, BYU Master of Science Libraries share a number of core values with the Open Source Software (OSS) movement, suggesting there should be a natural tendency toward library participation in OSS projects. However, Dale Askey’s 2008 Code4Lib column entitled We Love Open Source Software. No, You Can’t Have Our Code, claims that while libraries are strong proponents of OSS, they are unlikely to actually contribute to OSS projects. -
NLG-L Recipient, LG-72-18-0204
LG-72-18-0204-18 Fedora Commons, Inc. Abstract DuraSpace seeks a National Digital Platform Planning Grant for $49,279 to investigate barriers upgrading hundreds of U.S.-based libraries and archives running unsupported versions of Fedora. Running unsupported software puts at risk the stability, security, and functionality of the content and services they support. There are approximately 240 libraries and archives in the United States identified as using unsupported versions of Fedora making them target beneficiaries of the deliverables of this project. They include R1, R2, and R3 universities, liberal arts colleges, and not-for-profit special libraries hosted by historical societies and small research institutes. DuraSpace’s proposed one-year planning project, Designing a Migration Path: Assessing Barriers Upgrading to Fedora 4.x, will include consultation with an advisory board of stakeholders, conducting an environmental scan of relevant community initiatives, and gathering primary research data to determine what tools and supports are needed for the upgrade path. We can identify the following as deliverables for this proposed planning project: ● Describing a collection of the most common Fedora 3.x - Fedora 4.x upgrade user stories ● Creating an inventory of tools, documentation, and other resources for the upgrade path ● Providing the Islandora, Samvera, and Fedora community governance bodies feedback on the challenges and advantages of working within their communities ● Developing migration path recommendations and prioritizing -
Dspace Or Fedora: Which Is a Better Solution?
ISSN (Print): 0972-2467 ISSN (Online): 0976-2477 SRELS Journal of Information Management, Vol 56(1), February 2019, p. 45-50 DOI: 10.17821/srels/ 2019/v56i1/139265 Dspace or Fedora: Which is a Better Solution? Shazia Khan* Yasin Meo Degree College, Nuh - 122107, Haryana, India; library.ymd@gmail Abstract This paper presents a comparative study of two popular Digital Library Software, Dspace and Fedora. The paper begins with brief descriptions of Open Source Software systems and Digital libraries, and presents a comparison of Dspace and Fedora in two tables based on a set criterion. The study suggests that though Fedora provides the best repository frame- work as compared to other digital repository software systems, it appeals to high technical end users and as a result there are not as many installations of the software. Keywords: Digital Library, Dspace, Dublin Core, DuraSpace, Fedora, Metadata, Open Access Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI PMH), OpenDOAR, Open Source Software, Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR), Unicode, Interoperability 1. Introduction 2. Literature Review Free and open source software grants users the choice Gkoumas and Lazarinis conducted a study to evaluate open to use, copy, distribute, examine, change and improve source software for Digital Libraries as well as collection the software. These rights are defined in the licenses. management. The findings suggest that open source Free and open source software require a new kind digital library and collection management tools provide of competition, different from what is applicable to advanced operations and support various metadata and commercial software as they are not constricted by interoperability protocols with user-friendly interfaces. -
Evaluation and Usage Scenarios of Open Source Digital Library And
Program Evaluation and usage scenarios of open source digital library and collection management tools Georgios Gkoumas, Fotis Lazarinis, Article information: To cite this document: Georgios Gkoumas, Fotis Lazarinis, (2015) "Evaluation and usage scenarios of open source digital library and collection management tools", Program, Vol. 49 Issue: 3, pp.226-241, https:// doi.org/10.1108/PROG-09-2014-0070 Permanent link to this document: https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-09-2014-0070 Downloaded on: 14 December 2017, At: 06:36 (PT) References: this document contains references to 26 other documents. To copy this document: [email protected] The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 1427 times since 2015* Users who downloaded this article also downloaded: (2013),"Using open source software for digital libraries: A case study of CUSAT", The Electronic Library, Vol. 31 Iss 2 pp. 217-225 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471311312393">https:// doi.org/10.1108/02640471311312393</a> (2012),"Open source integrated library management systems: Comparative analysis of Koha and NewGenLib", The Electronic Library, Vol. 30 Iss 6 pp. 809-832 <a href="https:// doi.org/10.1108/02640471211282127">https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211282127</a> Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald- srm:478536 [] For Authors Downloaded by UFSCAR At 06:36 14 December 2017 (PT) If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. -
Community Code: Supporting the Mission of Open Access and Preservation with the Use of Open Source Library Technologies Keila Zayas-Ruiz and Mark Baggett
)ORULGD6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\/LEUDULHV 2018 Community Code: Supporting the Mission of Open Access and Preservation with the Use of Open Source Library Technologies Keila Zayas-Ruiz and Mark Baggett This book chapter was published in Applying Library Values to Emerging Technology: Decision-Making in the Age of Open Access, Maker Spaces, and the Ever-Changing Library (Publications in Librarianship #72) by the Association of College & Research Libraries. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Follow this and additional works at DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] CHAPTER 12 Community Code: Supporting the Mission of Open Access and Preservation with the Use of Open Source Library Technologies Keila Zayas-Ruiz* Sunshine State Digital Network Coordinator Strozier Library, Florida State University Mark Baggett Department Head, Digital Initiatives Hodges Library, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Introduction As librarians, we serve as champions for equal access and preservation of materials, both scholarly and cultural in signiicance. One of the core missions of libraries is access. Due to increased demand for scholarly articles and the technological advances of the internet, open access is quickly becoming a major priority among research libraries today. It “has expanded the possibilities for disseminating one’s own research and accessing that of others.”1 he movement of open access aligns closely with the ALA core value of access as outlined by the ALA council: “All * This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).