Indiana Law Journal Volume 83 Issue 4 Article 18 Fall 2008 BALCO, the Steroids Scandal, and What the Already Fragile Secrecy of Federal Grand Juries Means to the Debate over a Potential Federal Media Shield Law Peter Meyer Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Peter (2008) "BALCO, the Steroids Scandal, and What the Already Fragile Secrecy of Federal Grand Juries Means to the Debate over a Potential Federal Media Shield Law," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 83 : Iss. 4 , Article 18. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol83/iss4/18 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. BALCO, the Steroids Scandal, and What the Already Fragile Secrecy of Federal Grand Juries Means to the Debate over a Potential Federal Media Shield Law PETER MEYER* INTRODUCTION In recent years, the jailing of investigative reporters who refuse to betray the confidence of their informants has reawakened legislators,' academics, 2 and the media 3 to a perceived need for a federal reporter's privilege, one that would protect the press from compelled disclosure of secret sources. A recent, prominent case involved the 168-day imprisonment of Vanessa Leggett in 2001 .4A federal court held the self- proclaimed, freelance, investigative reporter in contempt for refusing to provide a federal grand jury with research she gathered for a true-crime novel.