DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation System Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation System Plan Toledo, Oregon TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN PREPARED FOR: City of Toledo WITH SUPPORT FROM: Oregon Department of Transportation Adopted by Ordinance #1352 on December 4, 2013 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... ES‐1 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 2. Transportation System Goals and Objectives .................................................................................... 2‐1 3. Modal Plans ...................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1 Street System Plan ........................................................................................................................ 3‐1 3.2 Transit Plan ................................................................................................................................. 3‐15 3.3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan ........................................................................................................ 3‐18 3.4 Port and Water Transportation Plan .......................................................................................... 3‐25 3.5 Rail Network ............................................................................................................................... 3‐27 3.6 Air Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 3‐27 3.7 Pipeline Network ........................................................................................................................ 3‐28 4. Implementation Measures ................................................................................................................ 4‐1 4.1 Street Standards ........................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.2 Funding Sources ......................................................................................................................... 4‐11 4.3 Recommended Code Language .................................................................................................. 4‐17 Tables Table ES‐1 Street System Project Cost Estimates and Prioritization ........................................................ ES‐2 Table ES‐2 Bicycle and Pedestrian System Project Cost Estimates and Prioritization ............................. ES‐3 Table ES‐3 Transit Project Cost Estimates and Prioritization ................................................................... ES‐4 Table ES‐4 Port and Water System Upgrade Cost Estimates and Prioritization ...................................... ES‐5 Table 3‐1 Street System Project Cost Estimates and Prioritization ......................................................... 3‐14 Table 3‐2 Transit Project Cost Estimates and Prioritization .................................................................... 3‐16 Table 3‐3 Bicycle and Pedestrian System Project Cost Estimates and Prioritization .............................. 3‐23 Table 3‐4 Port and Water System Upgrade Cost Estimates and Prioritization ....................................... 3‐26 Table 4‐1 Functional Classification Definitions.......................................................................................... 4‐2 Table 4‐2 Functional Classification Modifications ..................................................................................... 4‐4 Table 4‐3 Street Design Standards ............................................................................................................ 4‐5 Table 4‐4 Public Street Intersection Spacing Standards ............................................................................ 4‐9 Table 4‐5 Private Access Driveway Spacing Standards.............................................................................. 4‐9 Table 4‐6 Toledo TSP: Level‐of‐Service Criteria ....................................................................................... 4‐10 TOLEDO TSP I Contents Figures Figure 3‐1 Traffic Analysis Study Intersections.......................................................................................... 3‐2 Figure 3‐2 Street Projects .......................................................................................................................... 3‐4 Figure 3‐3 Freight Truck Route .................................................................................................................. 3‐6 Figure 3‐4 Project R2a: One Traffic Signal Option ..................................................................................... 3‐8 Figure 3‐5 Project R2b: Two Traffic Signal Option .................................................................................... 3‐8 Figure 3‐6 Project R3: A Street Turn Pocket .............................................................................................. 3‐9 Figure 3‐7 Project R4: Burgess Road Realigment .................................................................................... 3‐10 Figure 3‐8 Project R5: Sturdevant Road Realignment ............................................................................. 3‐11 Figure 3‐9 Project R6: A Street Railroad Crossing Improvements ........................................................... 3‐11 Figure 3‐10 Project R7: Butler Bridge Road and NW 1st Street Changes ................................................. 3‐12 Figure 3‐11 Toledo Transit Routes .......................................................................................................... 3‐17 Figure 3‐12 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects ........................................................................................... 3‐20 Figure 4‐1 Functional Classification System .............................................................................................. 4‐3 Figure 4‐2 Street Cross Section Arterial .................................................................................................... 4‐6 Figure 4‐3 Street Cross Section Collector Commercial .............................................................................. 4‐7 Figure 4‐4 Street Cross Section Local Main ............................................................................................... 4‐8 Appendixes Appendix A Plan Assessment Appendix B Transportation Funding Appendix C Transportation Deficiencies and Needs Appendix D Transportation Alternatives Appendix E Street Standards Appendix F Draft Objectives, Code, and Plan Amendments Appendix G Public Involvement Process ii TOLEDO TSP Acknowledgements Project Advisory Committee Project Management Team (PAC) (PMT) Nic Dahl, Dahl Disposal Michelle Amberg, City Manager, City of Toledo Jack Dunaway, Toledo City Council Stuart Cowie, Planner, City of Toledo (through February 2013) Dave Enyeart, City of Toledo Adam Denlinger, City Project Manager and Public Will Ewing, City of Toledo Works Director, City of Toledo (through May 2013) Rick Graff, Port of Toledo David Helton, Project Manager, Oregon Department Julie Kay, Lincoln County Transit of Transportation Anne Learned‐Ellis, Toledo Planning Commission Arlene Inukai, Planning Assistant, City of Toledo Stan Marshall, Georgia Pacific Toledo Allen Stewart, City of Toledo (through August 2012) Kirk Mitchell, Mitchell Trucking Aneta Synan, Planner, City of Toledo (as of May Penny Ryerson, Port of Toledo 2013) Jerry Seth, Toledo Planning Commission Bud Shoemake, Port of Toledo CH2M HILL Project Team Patrick Wingard, Department of Land Conservation Terra Lingley, AICP, Project Manager and Development Andra Henriques, PE Reza Farhoodi Billy Adams, PE Brandy Steffen Ryan Farncomb TOLEDO TSP III Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronyms and Abbreviations CWACT Cascades West Area Commission on Transportation DEQ Department of Environmental Quality DLCD Department of Land Conservation and Development FTA Federal Transit Administration LID Local Improvement District LOS Level of Service MAP‐21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century MNIF Marine Navigation Improvement Fund MPH Miles per hour ODOT Oregon Department of Transportation OHP Oregon Highway Plan OPRD Oregon Parks and Recreation Department ORS Oregon Revised Statutes OTIB Oregon Transportation Investment Bank PAC Project Advisory Committee PNWR Portland and Western Railroad PRLF Port Revolving Loan Fund SAFETEA‐LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users SDC System Development Charge STIP Statewide Transportation Improvement Program STP Surface Transportation Program TAP Transportation Alternatives Program TE Transportation Enhancement TGM Transportation Growth Management TIF Transportation Improvement Fund TIFIA Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program TPR Transportation Planning Rule TSP Transportation System Plan UGB Urban Growth Boundary v/c Volume to capacity iv TOLEDO TSP This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA‐LU), local government, and State of Oregon funds. The contents of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toledo-A Distance of 43 Miles-Via Siletz
    much further as the engineers deem it advis-year from that concern will amount to theas possible into two districts, leaving out able; and following: that portion in the south part which had been Be It Further Resolved-That a copy of Tonsembraced in the port of Alsea.Steps were this resolution be sent by the secretary of theLogs 400,000then taken toward issuing bonds with which commission to the Hon. Charles L. McNaryLumber 60,000to continue the work of improving the harbor and the Hon. Robert IV. Stanfield, our UnitedFuel oil entrance.The first bond issue was for $75,- States senators-and to the Hon. W. C. Haw- 3,750000 on December 1, 1917, after the Secretary ley, the member of Congress from this dis-Logging equipment and supplies. 1,200of War had issued a permit, on August 11, trict." -PORT OF TOLEDO 1917, authorizing the two port commissions -PORT OF NEWPORT Total . 464,950 to enter into contracts for the work contem- PORT OF NEWPORT plated. EXHIBIT "A"-OOTOBER 31, 1923 AND JOINT WORK The work of the two commissions was done "Logs handled in rafts by two boats from The firstmeeting of the Newport Portthroughajointcommitteewhichhas Manary's log dump in Yaquina bay harbor toCommission was held in Newport on May 26,functioned harmoniously and of which Capt. the mill at Toledo, Oreg., a distance of nine1910, following the appointment of the com-Jacobson has been president since its organ- miles, from September 1, 1922, to October 31,missioners by the governor. ization. 1923 (fourteen months), 55,945,099 feet or An attempt had been made to organize one Under this arrangement work on the south 223,780 tons.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Economic Study
    Ten Year Update on Lincoln County, Oregon's Economy prepared by: The Research Group, LLC prepared for: Lincoln County Board of Commissioners August 2014 SUMMARY Onno Husing, Director, Lincoln County Planning and Development Department Background The Research Group, LLC (TRG) prepared a report for the Lincoln County Board of Commissioners. The report contains results from a ten year check-in on recent economic and social indicators in Lincoln County, Oregon. The front cover of the report features a graph (see Display 1) that speaks volumes about Lincoln County's economy. The graph shows two trend lines and both lines are trending upwards over the last several years. One trend line represents "Covered Employment." The other line represents "Covered Wages." The income line is outpacing the upward movement of the employment line. This trend suggests Lincoln County has experienced a surge in family wage jobs in the last few years. Inside the report you will also Display 1 find a number of important "pie Lincoln County Annual Covered Employment charts" and "bar charts." Like a and Wages in 2003 to 2013 chest X-ray, these representations illustrate what's happening to the different sectors within Lincoln County's economy over time. The report tells us a compelling story. 1J:\boc\board\PIO\Media Releases\Archive - Media Releases 2014\Media Release - August 2014\Economic Study_2014\Introd Display 2 A Larger and More Resilient Coastal Counties Total Personal Income in 2003 and 2012 Economy First, before we go any further, let's glance at Lincoln County's total personal income in 2003 and 2012 (see Display 2).
    [Show full text]
  • This Was in July, 1885, Four His Brush Mattresses and Stone Ballast for Bay
    A Pi-IOTOGRAPH TAKEN ON Ti-JE N. E. , N. W. , SEC. 19, T. 14 S., R.11 W., ALONG SPUR 4 OF THE LOGGING RAILROAD OF THEMAN- CAMP 1.VIEW INCLUDES ABOUT SIXTY TREES RANGING: SITKA SPRUCE 3 TO 5FEET, DOUGLAS FIR 2 TO 5FEET, AND -IE STAND AVERAGES 150,000 FEET TO TUE ACRE $160,000.This wasinJuly,1885,four But we may not hurry too rapidly throughgale arose and on December 11 the "Yaquina years after Mr. Poihemus had begun work onthe years of 1887 and 1888 without chroni-City" broke in two and was a total loss. his brush mattresses and stone ballastfor cling two incidents which had a great influ- The investigation of the loss of the "Ya- upper works. ence on the port and its commercial devel-quina City" was held early in 1888, when It Congress remained silent to the plea of the opment.These incidents were two wrecks,was found that "witnesses had disappeared," around which floats a veil of mystery andand the board determined that the "causes bay that year and only$2,587.49 was ex- wereaccidental"andheld"themaster pended.On August 5, 1886, however, $75,-about which strange stories are still told. blameless." 000 was appropriated and the work was be-TWO VESSELS WRECKEDTURNING The "Yaquina City" was replaced by the gun anew.The port and its feeder, the rail-POINT OF PLAN REAIIED steamer "Yaquina Bay," a vessel of similar road built intothevalley,had begunto size.She made her first trip into Yaquina show results. From July 1, 1885, to De- For several years the steamer "YaquinaBay in December, 1888, arriving there on the cember 31, of the same year 5,130 tons ofCity" had entered the port to carry out hereighth.
    [Show full text]
  • General Manager
    General Manager Opening Date: October 15, 2020 Closing Date: November 6, 2020 Location: Port of Toledo, Oregon General Position Summary: The General Manager for the Port of Toledo is the Port's Chief Executive Officer, responsible for the overall operation and administration of the Port. The General Manager reports directly to the 5-member, publicly elected Port Commission. The Port of Toledo, founded in 1910, is located on the beautiful central coast of Oregon, approximately 7 miles from Newport, Oregon. The Port encompasses 443 square miles, including Toledo and Siletz's cities, and includes a large area of unincorporated Lincoln County with facilities located along the scenic Yaquina River. With substantial commercial and industrial property holdings, a shipyard, and marine facilities, including marinas for commercial vessels and recreational boating, the Port offers a wide variety of services to develop, promote, and sustain the area's economic vitality. The Port is well-positioned for a multitude of development opportunities and expansion of its recreational facilities. Education, Experience, Required: • A Bachelor's degree in business administration, public administration, or a related field • Seven years' experience in a senior leadership role managing people, projects, and finances; an equivalent combination of training, education, and understanding, demonstrating the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to perform the job's essential duties. OR • An equivalent combination of education, training, and experience sufficient
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Newport Strategic Business Plan Update & Capital Facilities
    2019 Update Port of Newport Strategic Business Plan + Capital Facilities Plan Thank you - to the Port of Newport, its stakeholders, and community partners for sharing their time and insight in the development of this Strategic Business Plan. PORT OF NEWPORT 2019 STRATEGIC BUSINESS PLAN UPDATE PORT OF NEWPORT PROJECT NO.: A19.0100.00 DATE: 19 JULY 2019 WSP USA (FORMERLY BERGERABAM) 116 THIRD STREET, SUITE 305 HOOD RIVER, OREGON 97031 T: +1 541-386-1047 WSP.COM ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This strategic business plan was developed by the Port of Newport with assistance from Business Oregon. For more information about the Port of Newport, visit www.portofnewport.com/. COMMISSIONERS Stewart Lamerdin, President Sara Skamser, Vice President Walter Chuck, Secretary/Treasurer Jeff Lackey, Commissioner James Burke, Commissioner STAFF Teri Dresler, Interim General Manager Aaron Bretz, Director of Operations Kent Gibson, Commercial Harbormaster Karen Hewitt, Administrative Supervisor Mark Harris, Accounting Supervisor Rebecca Bishop, Accounting Clerk Bill Hewitt, RV Park Supervisor Chris Urbach, South Beach Marina Harbormaster PREPARED FOR Port of Newport 600 SE Bay Boulevard Newport, Oregon 97365 PREPARED BY WSP USA Inc. (formerly BergerABAM) 116 Third Street, Suite 305 Hood River, Oregon 97031 IN ASSOCIATION WITH BST Associates P.O. Box 2224 Anacortes, Washington 98221-8106 JULY 2019 Port of Newport WSP, A19.0100.00 Strategic Business Plan July 2019 Newport, Oregon Page i of vii TABLE OF SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION AND STRATEGIC PLANNING CONTENTS PROCESS… ............................................................. 1 1.1. Purpose ................................................................................... 1 1.2. Plan Formation and Organization ......................................... 1 1.3. Public Outreach ...................................................................... 2 2. PORT HISTORY ........................................................ 2 3. PORT VALUES, VISION, AND MISSION .................
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Packet
    PORT OF NEWPORT COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Monday, October 15, 2018, 12:00 pm South Beach Activities Room 2120 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365 I. Call to Order Page II. Public Comment (3 minute limit per person) III. Contract with BergerABAM for the Port’s Strategic Business Plan ............... 3 IV. Rondys Lease Addendum .............................................................................. 69 V. NOAA MOC-P Dredging 2018-2019 Contract ............................... Addendum VI. Public Comment (3 minute limit per person) VII. Adjournment Regular monthly meetings are scheduled for the fourth Tuesday of every month at 6:00 p.m. The Port of Newport South Beach Marina and RV Park Activity Room is accessible to people with disabilities. A request for an interpreter for the hearing impaired or for other accommodations for persons with disabilities should be made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to Port of Newport Administration Office at 541-265-7758. Link for directions to the RV Park Activity Room: http://portofnewport.com/rv-parks/map.php -###- Commission Work Session Agenda December 15, 2017 Page 1 of 1 Commission Special Meeting October 10, 2018 Page 2 of 72 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 9, 2018 RE: Strategic Business Plan and Capital Facilities Plan Update Proposals TO: Port of Newport Board of Commissioners ISSUED BY: Teri Dresler – Interim General Manager BACKGROUND In January 2013, the Port Commission approved a Strategic Business Plan and Capital Facilities Plan that was consistent with the objective of Ports 2010: A New Strategic Business Plan. Business Oregon has established a structure for the planning process that includes an update every 5 years following a process similar to the planning process that was completed in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Yaquina Bay and River Maintenance Dredging
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT YAQUINA BAY AND RIVER MAINTENANCE DREDGING Prepared For US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District PO Box 2946 Portland, OR 97208 Prepared By 600 University Street, Suite 610 Seattle, WA 98101 June 30, 2015 Yaquina Bay and River Maintenance Dredging Environmental Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Yaquina Bay and River Federal Navigation Project was authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Acts of: June 14, 1880, March 2, 1919, August 26, 1937, March 2, 1945, July 24, 1946, July 3, 1958, and a RHA section 107 Project from July 14, 1960. Dredging Yaquina River (including Depot Slough) was authorized by Congress under the RHA of March 4, 1913 and a RHA section 107 Project in 1960. These authorizations include the construction, operation and maintenance of two jetty structures and other navigation-related features, and maintenance of the navigation channels through the mouth of Yaquina Bay up the Yaquina River to about RM 14. The purpose of the Yaquina Bay and River Federal Navigation Project (the “Project”) is for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District (Corps) to maintain the federal navigation channels, which also includes the South Beach Marina Federal Access Channel and the Depot Slough Access Channel, at their authorized depths and widths by periodically removing restricting shoals of naturally occurring sediment material. These ongoing maintenance dredging activities provide adequate channel dimensions for vessel access and use upstream to approximately river mile (RM) 14. By maintaining adequate navigational dimensions, the Project further serves to decrease waiting times and increase navigability for vessels crossing the entrance bar. Periodic shoals develop within the Yaquina Bay and River navigation channels due to the buildup of materials from fluvial and marine origins.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Toledo Economic Opportunities Analysis With
    Toledo Economic Opportunities Analysis Prepared for: City of Toledo 206 N. Main Street Toledo, Oregon 97391 Prepared by: Oregon Cascades West Council of Governments 1400 Queen Ave SE Ste 205A Albany, OR 97322 This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements Special acknowledgments and thanks are given to those who served on the Project Committee and the Technical Advisory Team. Project Committee Doug Alldridge Karen Gerttula Tad Brown Stu Miller Nancy Bryant Jake Postlewait Mark Camara (ex officio) Tina Retasket Rod Cross (ex officio) Terri Strom Larry Davis Rick Wright Chuck Gerttula (ex officio) Technical Advisory Team Michelle Amberg Dennie Houle Pam Barlow-Lind Steve Larrabbe Caroline Bauman Marguerite Nabeta Jed Cohen Bud Shoemake Tom Hogue Matt Spangler Funding for this study was made available by the Department of Land Conservation and Development, with additional assistance from the City of Toledo and the Oregon Cascades West Council of Governments 2010 Toledo Economic Opportunities Analysis i Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Table of Contents ii Introduction 1 EOA Process Study Area Toledo Economic Development Objectives 3 Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives Stakeholder Interviews Community Survey Previous Community Studies The Toledo Community and Economy 6 Population and Demographic Trends Population Projections Employment Trends Employment Projections Summary Economic Opportunities and Constraints 16 Economic Development Characteristics Summary Potential Growth Areas and Site Needs 19 Wood and Paper Products Boat
    [Show full text]
  • Public Hearinghearing
    YAQUINA RIVER ANDAND TRIBUTARIESTRIBUTARIES OREGON REVIEW REPORTREPORT TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARINGHEARING Held atat Toledo, OregonOregon 27 AprApril i I 1965 !1j Ii IIIEIj PREPARED BYBY U..U.S. S. ARMYARMY ENGINEERENGINEER DISTRICT,DISTRICT, PORTLANDPORTLAND CORPS OF ENGINEERSENGINEERS JULY 19651965 1 YAQUINA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIESTRIBUTARIES OREGON REVIEW RRPORTREPORT TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC REARINGHEARING HELD IN TOLEDO, OREGON 27 APRIL 19651965 Prepared byby U. S. Army Engineer District,District, PortlandPortland Corps of Engineers July 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Index of Participants ------------------------------------------ i Attendance ----------------------------------------------------- ii List of Exhibits Presented ------------------------------------- iv Oral Statements ------------------------------------------------ 1 23 ExhibitsExhibits------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- 23 PARTICIPANTS IN HEARING HELD AT TOLEDO, OREGON 27 April 19651965 NAME PAGE Colonel William J.J. TalbottTalbott 1 Alfred J. Jones 3 Bert J. Olin 5 Alan D. Anderson 6 Dr. MatthewMatthew CruberGruber 7 Walter D.D. Jaspers 8 Rollie F. Rousseau 9 Roy E. SamsSams 9 Ralph H. ImlerImler 11 Sid Knox 14 Thomas M.N. Lashbaugh 15 Edward C.G. DahlDahl 16 Claus Christiansen 16 Ralph MacomberNacomber 17 MattNatt Spellman 17 Thor Linden 18 ATTENDANCE AT HEARING HELD AT TOLEDO, OREGON 27 AprilApril 19651965 NAME ADDRESS Anderson, Alan D.D. Newport, Oregon Bates, Opal V.V. Toledo, Oregon Bell, Lowell G. Newport, Oregon Black, George 0. Portland, Oregon Breese, Wilbur P.P. Newport, Oregon Busher, Sylvester C.C. Toledo, Oregon Campbell, Don R.R. Corvallis, Oregon Christiansen, ClausClaus Toledo, Oregon Coxen, Betty J.J. Toledo, Oregon Dahl, EdwardEdward G.G. Toledo, Oregon Dahi,Dahl, LoreneLorene J.J. Toledo, Oregon Eggen, Harold A.A. Newport, Oregon Fieber, Dorothy E.E. Toledo, Oregon Gilstrak, Faye Harlan, OregonOregon Gilstrak, RalphRalph J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • January 6, 2021 Meeting Packet
    CITY OF TOLEDO AGENDA City Hall 206 N. Main St. Toledo, Oregon 97391 6:00 p.m. TOLEDO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting – Via Zoom Meeting Platform January 6, 2021 Virtual Meeting: Due to the governor’s “Stay Home, Stay Healthy” order, the City Council will hold the meeting through the Zoom video meeting platform. The public is invited to attend the meeting electronically. E-mail [email protected] to receive the meeting login information. Public Comments: The City Council may take limited verbal comments during the meeting. Written comments may be submitted by email to [email protected] 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting to be included in the record. Comments received will be shared with the City Council and included in the record. 1. Call to Order and roll call 2. Presentations Oath of Office – Mayor Oath of Office – Council-Elect Joshua Smith, Jackie Kauffman and Todd Michels Proclamation & Presentation – Human Trafficking Awareness Month – Human Trafficking Advocate & Coordinator Lizzie Martinez Audit Presentation – Teresa Hanford, Hanford & Associates 3. Visitors/Public Comment (The public comment period provides the public with an opportunity to address the City Council regarding items not on the agenda. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes). 4. Consent Agenda Resolution No. 1454, A resolution extending the state of emergency declaration to March 3, 2021 5. Discussion Items Discussion regarding allowing restaurants to use parking spaces in front as additional dining area 6. Decision Items Resolution No. 1455, A resolution to receive the Audit as presented by Hanford & Associates Resolution No. 1456, A resolution adopting the City of Toledo’s representation in the updates to the Lincoln County Multi-Jurisdictional Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan Comments submitted in advance are preferable.
    [Show full text]