Concord Gas Light Company Gasholder House
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
4“4H% @FJ 05585 -1.— —.—. 21 ‘T World Gas Conference - June 6-9, 2000- Nice - France
4“4h% @FJ 05585 -1.— —.—._ 21 ‘T World Gas Conference - June 6-9, 2000- Nice - France REPORT OF WORKING COMMITTEE 2 PRODUCTION OF MANUFACTURED GASES RAPPORT DU COMITE DE TRAVAIL 2 PRODUTION DE GAZ MANUFACTURES Chairman/President Francis S. Lau United States of America I DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best availabie original document. ABSTRACT The Committee’s work during this triennium focused on 4 topic areas. They are: the potential of hydrogen in meeting long term energy demands, future development prospects for manufactured gas units/gasification of coal, biomass, and opportunity materials for the production of electricity and chemicals, recovery of methane from coal seams, and update on management of contaminated gas sites. This report presents the status and the potentials of present and future opportunities for the gas industry in the areas of manufactured gases including hydrogen and coal bed/mine methane. The idea of hydrogen as an energy carrier is getting increased attention these days for its promise of super clean emissions at the point of use. The development of fuel cells for stationary and mobile applications has highlighted the need of hydrogen production, storage and infrastructure. Hydrogen appears destined to be a major energy source of the future. The industry for gasification is growing, particularly for the production of electricity and chemicals from opportunity fuels, such as petroleum coke from refineries. Coal and biomass are also getting increased interests due to their promise of high efficiency and lower emissions. Methane from coal mines is also getting increased attention due not only to its environmental benefits but also to its favorable own economics. -
The Optimal Role for Gas in a Net-Zero Emissions Energy System
Gas for Climate. The optimal role for gas in a net zero emissions energy system ah ©2019 Navigant Page i Gas for Climate. The optimal role for gas in a net zero emissions energy system Gas for Climate. The optimal role for gas in a net-zero emissions energy system Prepared for: By: Wouter Terlouw, Daan Peters, Juriaan van Tilburg, Matthias Schimmel, Tom Berg, Jan Cihlar, Goher Ur Rehman Mir, Matthias Spöttle, Maarten Staats, Maud Buseman, Ainhoa Villar Lejaretta, Mark Schenkel, Irina van Hoorn, Chris Wassmer, Eva Kamensek, Tobias Fichter Reviewed by: Kees van der Leun and Prof. Dr. Kornelis Blok Navigant Netherlands B.V. Stadsplateau 15 3521 AZ Utrecht +31 30 662 3300 navigant.com Reference No.: 203997 Date: 18 March 2019 ©2019 Navigant Page ii Gas for Climate. The optimal role for gas in a net zero emissions energy system Executive summary The purpose of this study is to assess the most cost-optimal way to fully decarbonise the EU energy system by 2050 and to explore the role and value of renewable and low-carbon gas used in existing gas infrastructure. This is being done by comparing a “minimal gas” scenario with an “optimised gas” scenario. This study is an updated version of the February 2018 Gas for Climate study, with an extended scope of analysis. The current study adds an analysis of EU energy demand in the industry and transport sectors. It also includes an updated supply and cost analysis for biomethane and green hydrogen, including dedicated renewable electricity production to produce hydrogen, and an analysis on power to methane. -
Blending Hydrogen Into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: a Review of Key Issues
Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-5600-51995 March 2013 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev Prepared under Task No. HT12.2010 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5600-51995 Golden, Colorado 80401 March 2013 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. -
LLNL Underground Coal Gasification: an Overview of Groundwater
David W. Camp Joshua A. White Underground Coal Gasification: An Overview of Groundwater Contamination Hazards and Mitigation Strategies March 2015 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-TR-668633 Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore Na- tional Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or useful- ness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. v Acknowledgements This work was funded by a 2012 Applied Science Grant from the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE- AC52-07NA27344. The authors wish to thank Duane Matt and other members of the OSM Underground Coal Gasification Working Group for their support and recommendations. We also thank the Clean Air Task Force (CATF) for earlier funding that allowed LLNL to begin investi- gating groundwater contamination issues. -
Maintaining Harvest Fresh Apples Controlled Atmosphere Storage Requires Accurate Carbon Dioxide Measurements
Penny Hickey Application Engineer Vaisala Woburn, MA, USA Maintaining harvest fresh apples Controlled Atmosphere storage requires accurate carbon dioxide measurements Controlled atmosphere (CA) storage is a widely used technique for long-term storage of freshly picked fruits and vege- tables. Historically, CA storage has been the primary method for the long-term storage of apples. Through a biological process called respiration, apples take in oxygen and generate carbon dioxide, water, and heat. Controlled Atmosphere storage is an entirely natural process that reduces the effects of respiration to a minimum by controlling the environmental condi- tions surrounding the stored fruit. CA storage makes it possible to buy crisp, juicy apples year round. Many cultivars of apples can be preserved for a remarkable 9 – 12 months in CA storage, as opposed to only 2 – 3 months if using refrigerated storage. Optimal conditions important In order to effectively preserve apples the storage atmosphere must have a controlled amount of humidity, oxygen (O2), carbon dioxide (CO2) and temper- ature. The essence of CA storage is the range for O2 and CO2 concentrations, which both must be kept between 0.5 to 2.5%. The precise optimum concentra- tions vary for different varieties of apples (i.e. Golden Delicious apples may need different conditions than Jonagold apples, etc). The relative humidity is kept in the range between 90 to 95%. High relative humidity slows down water loss and enhances storage life of the produce, but humidity too close to saturation encour- ages bacterial growth. Temperature in the storage container is maintained 4 | Vaisala News 175 / 2 0 07 CA storage makes it possible to buy crisp, juicy apples year round. -
Gasworks Profiles
Gasworks Profiles Gasworks Profile A: The History and Operation of Gasworks (Manufactured Gas Plants) in Britain Gasworks Profile B: Gasholders and their Tanks Gasworks Profile C: Water Gas Plants Gasworks Profile D: Producer Gas Plants ISBN 978-1-905046-26-3 © CL:AIRE 2014 Published by Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE), 32 Bloomsbury Street, London WC1B 3QJ. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any other means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the copyright holder. The Gasworks Profiles have been prepared by: Dr Russell Thomas, Technical Director Parsons Brinckerhoff Redland, Bristol, UK Tel: 0117-933-9262 Email: [email protected] or [email protected]. The author is grateful to fellow members of the Institution of Gas Engineers and Managers Panel for the history of the industry and the staff of the National Grid Gas Archive for their kind assistance. CL:AIRE would like to thank members of its Technology and Research Group who reviewed and commented on these profiles. All images courtesy of the National Grid Gas Archive, unless stated. Disclaimer: The purpose of this document is to act as a pointer to the activities carried out on former manufactured gas plants (gasworks). The Author and Publisher will not be responsible for any loss, however arising, from the use of, or reliance on, this information. This document (‘this publication’) is provided ‘as is’ without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this publication is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose you have in mind when using it. -
DRAFT Comparative Assessment of Technology Options for Biogas Clean‐Up
Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program DRAFT INTERIM PROJECT REPORT DRAFT Comparative Assessment of Technology Options for Biogas Clean‐up Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: California Biomass Collaborative University of California, Davis OCTOBER 2014 CEC‐500‐11‐020, TASK 8 Prepared by: Primary Author(s): Matthew D. Ong Robert B. Williams Stephen R. Kaffka California Biomass Collaborative University of California, Davis 1 Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 Contract Number: 500-11-020, Task 8 Prepared for: California Energy Commission Michael Sokol Contract Manager Aleecia Gutierrez Office Manager Energy Generation Research Office Laurie ten Hope Deputy Director Energy Research and Development Robert Oglesby Executive Director DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to express his gratitude and appreciation to the following individuals for their various contributions to the development of this report: California Biomass Collaborative Robert Williams, Project Supervisor Dr. Stephen Kaffka, Project Manager Dr. Bryan Jenkins, Contract Manager American Biogas Council Bioenergy Association of California. -
Will Makeun Til at Mata U
WILL MAKEUN USTIL 20170253312A1 AT MATA U ( 19) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2017/ 0253312 A1 Burleson et al. (43 ) Pub . Date : Sep . 7 , 2017 ( 54 ) PORTABLE INFLATABLE HABITAT WITH B63C 11 /52 (2006 .01 ) MODULAR PAYLOAD , SYSTEM AND B63C 11 / 42 (2006 . 01 ) METHOD B63C 11 : 44 ( 2006 .01 ) B63B 21 /26 ( 2006 . 01 ) (71 ) Applicants :Winslow Scott Burleson , New York , 2 ) U . S . Cl. NY (US ) ; Michael Lombardi , CPC .. B63C 11 /325 ( 2013 .01 ) ; B63C 11 /44 Rumford , RI ( US) ( 2013 . 01 ) ; B63C 11/ 30 (2013 .01 ) ; B63B 21/ 26 ( 2013 . 01 ) ; B63C 11/ 52 ( 2013. 01 ) ; B63C 11/ 42 ( 72 ) Inventors : Winslow Scott Burleson , New York , ( 2013 .01 ) ; B01D 53 /0407 ( 2013 .01 ) ; B01D NY (US ) ; Michael Lombardi, 2257 / 504 ( 2013 .01 ) ; B01D 2259 /4566 Rumford , RI (US ) ( 2013 .01 ) ( 73 ) Assignees: New York University , New York , NY ( 57 ) ABSTRACT (US ) ; Michael Lombardi, Rumford , RI A diving apparatus for a diver underwater includes a por (US ) table habitat in which a breathable environment is main tained underwater . The habitat has a collapsible envelope . The collapsible envelope takes shape through inflation to an (21 ) Appl. No. : 15/ 438 ,415 expanded state underwater . The habitat has a modular pay ( 22) Filed : Feb . 21 , 2017 load which removably attaches to the envelope underwater. The habitat has a seat on which a diver can sit while the Related U . S . Application Data habitat is underwater. The modular payload has a breathable gas source to provide breathable gas for the diver to breathe (60 ) Provisional application No . -
Cool GTL for the Production of Jet Fuel from Biogas
DOE Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) 2021 Project Peer Review Cool GTL to Produce Jet Fuel from Biogas March 25, 2021 WBS: 3.5.1.405 Terry Marker Gas Technology Institute This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information 1 Cool GTL for the Production of Jet Fuel from Biogas Project Overview 2 Project Overview Cool GTL to Produce Jet Fuel from Biogas • Goal is to produce 100 gallons of Jet Fuel from Biogas using the Cool GTL Process – GTI will demonstrate a new simple GTL process which converts biogas, CO2, and methane directly to jet, gasoline, and diesel – Show the technology to be significantly lower cost, and more efficient than previous GTL processes- produce jet fuel at < $3/GGE – Also complete modeling, engineering, technoeconomic and LCA for Cool GTL biogas commercial process- advance from TRL 3 to 5 3 3 Cool GTL • Converts CO2-rich methane, ethane and propane to high-quality gasoline, diesel and jet fuel • Works well for any gas containing CO2 or CO • Uses unique CO2/steam reforming catalyst to directly make 2:1 H2/CO synthesis gas • Uses unique combined Fischer-Tropsch and wax-cracking reactor • Simple and compact with unique catalysts in each stage 4 SM Unique Cool GTL Technology Novel Features Beneficial Results • Unique bi-reforming catalyst • Modular, low-cost GTL • Unique wax cracking-FT catalyst • Small footprint • Unique electric reformer design • Great economics • Distributed plant locations Two patents issued Current GTL Cool GTLSM and several others pending 5 SM -
Research Bibliography on the Industrial History of the Hudson-Mohawk Region
Research Bibliography on the Industrial History of the Hudson-Mohawk Region by Sloane D. Bullough and John D. Bullough 1. CURRENT INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY Anonymous. Watervliet Arsenal Sesquicentennial, 1813-1963: Arms for the Nation's Fighting Men. Watervliet: U.S. Army, 1963. • Describes the history and the operations of the U.S. Army's Watervliet Arsenal. Anonymous. "Energy recovery." Civil Engineering (American Society of Civil Engineers) 54 (July 1984): 60- 61. • Describes efforts of the City of Albany to recycle and burn refuse for energy use. Anonymous. "Tap Industrial Technology to Control Commercial Air Conditioning." Power 132 (May 1988): 91–92. • The heating, ventilation and air–conditioning (HVAC) system at the Empire State Plaza in Albany is described. Anonymous. "Albany Scientist Receives Patent on Oscillatory Anemometer." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 70 (March 1989): 309. • Describes a device developed in Albany to measure wind speed. Anonymous. "Wireless Operation Launches in New York Tri- Cities." Broadcasting 116 10 (6 March 1989): 63. • Describes an effort by Capital Wireless Corporation to provide wireless premium television service in the Albany–Troy region. Anonymous. "FAA Reviews New Plan to Privatize Albany County Airport Operations." Aviation Week & Space Technology 132 (8 January 1990): 55. • Describes privatization efforts for the Albany's airport. Anonymous. "Albany International: A Century of Service." PIMA Magazine 74 (December 1992): 48. • The manufacture and preparation of paper and felt at Albany International is described. Anonymous. "Life Kills." Discover 17 (November 1996): 24- 25. • Research at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy on the human circulation system is described. Anonymous. "Monitoring and Data Collection Improved by Videographic Recorder." Water/Engineering & Management 142 (November 1995): 12. -
Dr. Kutscher: Well, Thanks Very Much, Rob
DR. KUTSCHER: WELL, THANKS VERY MUCH, ROB. 25 AND THANK YOU, ROB AND MELINDA, FOR 0597 1 INVITING ME TO THIS MEETING. I HAVE REALLY BEEN 2 ENJOYING IT. I'VE BEEN LEARNING A LOT, ALTHOUGH I 3 MUST SAY A LOT OF THE FACTS THAT HAVE BEEN PRESENTED 4 ARE QUITE SOBERING. 5 I WORK FOR THE NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY 6 LABORATORY, WHICH IS A DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY LAB IN 7 GOLDEN, COLORADO. THERE ARE ABOUT 1,200 OF US THAT 8 WORK ON RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES. BUT MOST OF 9 WHAT I'M GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT WAS NOT DONE BY 10 NREL; IT WAS DONE BY VOLUNTEERS FOR THE AMERICAN 11 SOLAR ENERGY SOCIETY. SO I DO WANT TO MAKE THAT 12 CLEAR AT THE OUTSET. 13 OKAY. THAT IS MY SON, AND I WANTED TO 14 MENTION THAT MY WIFE AND SON AND I REALLY ENJOY 15 SNORKELING. SO I THINK ALL OF US ARE 16 CONCERNED ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE FROM THE GLOBAL 17 IMPACT. WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN 18 IN AFRICA, WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN BANGLADESH; BUT, 19 ALSO, ALL OF US HAVE SOME INDIVIDUAL THINGS ABOUT 20 CLIMATE CHANGE THAT TEND TO AFFECT US. AND FOR US, 21 IT'S WHAT HAPPENS TO THE CORAL REEFS. AND WE SAW 22 SOME VERY GOOD PRESENTATIONS ON THAT YESTERDAY. 23 THIS IS A PICTURE I TOOK OF MY SON IN THE 24 CARIBBEAN. THIS IS ABOUT TWO YEARS, THREE YEARS AGO. 25 AND THESE ARE SOME PHOTOS IN THE CARIBBEAN THAT WE 0598 1 TOOK, SHOWING VERY LUSH CORAL REEFS, VERY 2 THRIVING CORAL REEFS. -
The Paradox of Smokeless Fuels: Gas, Coke and the Environment in Britain, 1813-1949 Author(S): PETER THORSHEM Source: Environment and History, Vol
The Paradox of Smokeless Fuels: Gas, Coke and the Environment in Britain, 1813-1949 Author(s): PETER THORSHEM Source: Environment and History, Vol. 8, No. 4 (November 2002), pp. 381-401 Published by: White Horse Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20723251 . Accessed: 21/05/2014 13:49 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. White Horse Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Environment and History. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 152.15.236.17 on Wed, 21 May 2014 13:49:22 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The Paradox of Smokeless Fuels: Gas, Coke and the Environment inBritain, 1813-1949 PETER THORSHEIM Department ofHistory University ofNorth Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223, USA Email: pthorshe @ email, uncc. edu ABSTRACT The contemporary world faces a toxic legacy: environmental contamination caused by past industrial activities. In Britain, a large proportion of the soil and groundwater pollution that occurred during the nineteenth and first half of the twentieth century came from gasworks and coke plants. Paradoxically, many people long viewed them as the answer to the country's pollution problems.