1 Feminizing the Male Persona
1 Feminizing the Male Persona: Effeminacy as Rebellion and Subversion Author: Donovan Cleckley Faculty Mentor: Dr. Cathlena Martin School: University of Montevallo 2 Recognized and understood as concepts, “man” and “woman,” do not exist independently of the gendered discourse which defines “manhood” and “womanhood.” This statement does not mean that the categories of man and woman are not real; rather, it means that they are constructions, woven into the very fabric of everyday life. Involving the linguistic designation of man and woman, gendered discourse, as it is institutionalized and policed, thus controls what is acceptable and unacceptable in terms of given performances and presentations of gender. Trouble arises over the variance of gender, being new ways of doing gender, in an accepted binary system which emphasizes the dichotomy of the masculine and the feminine. Built on polarity, and problematic as such, this hegemonic model of gender, functioning as a lens through which to see bodies, comprehends definite blue or definite red without considering that qualities designated as either masculine or feminine, associated with either man or woman, respectively, are all qualities capable of human beings. In considering the existing chasm between maleness and femaleness, Charlotte Perkins Gilman writes that, although the confinement of women to their “feminine functions,” as defined by androcentric culture, deprives them of their full humanity, men, even while ahead of women in patriarchal society, suffer because “maleness […] warps and disfigures their [men’s] humanness.”1 Instead of pure blue and pure red, it seems as if, moving away from masculinity and femininity and toward humanness, shades of purple, differing in shared hues of blueness and redness, exist.
[Show full text]