DOCSLIB.ORG

Staging the Tragedy of Time: Paul Cret and the Delaware River Bridge Author(S): Jonathan E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Staging the Tragedy of Time: Paul Cret and the Delaware River Bridge Author(S): Jonathan E Staging the Tragedy of Time: Paul Cret and the Delaware River Bridge Author(s): Jonathan E. Farnham Source: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 57, No. 3 (Sep., 1998), pp. 258- 279 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Society of Architectural Historians Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/991346 . Accessed: 02/08/2013 18:04 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Society of Architectural Historians are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 132.216.1.39 on Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:04:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Staging the Tragedy of Time PaulCret and the Delaware River Bridge within these which in the United Statesin the JONATHAN E. FARNHAM,Princeton University practices, began late nineteenth century, architectsencountered new bound- On 6 January 1925 in the Rose Garden of the Bellevue- ariesas well as new notions of boundedness.4By the beginning Stratford Hotel in Philadelphia, at the Delaware River of the modern period, the central problem of American Bridge (DRB) Third Annual Staff Dinner, Paul Cret, the architecturewas conceived in terms of links and limits;it was a Beaux-Arts-educated French architect and professor of design problem of bridging. at the School of Fine Arts at the University of Pennsylvania, sat The prominent role of bridges in both the theory and at Table 16 with his collaborators, engineers Montgomery historiographyof the Europeanarchitectural avant-garde dur- Case, Clement Chase, Allston Dana, and Leon Moisseiff (Fig- ing this period is well known. For example, Le Corbusier's ure 1).1 During the evening the celebrants sang several songs essay "Esth6tiquede l'ing6nieur architecture"of 1921, re- from the "Third Annual Staff Dinner Song Book," including printed as the firstchapter of Versune architecture (1923), opens two specifically about the bridge. As might be expected of any with an image of Alexandre GustaveEiffel's Pont de Garabit eulogy of a bridge, the lyrics to "Song 23" evoked notions of (1884) (Figure 2). The bridge is presented as the apex of unity and connection: nineteenth-centuryFrench engineering and the herald of a new tradition. For Le Corbusier,the modern iron or steel There'sa long, long Bridgea-stretching across the RiverDelaware bridge was the foremost emblem of "The direct And unites the StateofJersey with our Pennsylvaniafair. technology. and immediate of the "mark[ed] As a monument of glory,of greatendeavor and of fame expression progress," bridge out the of civilization"and the toward a It willalways be connectedwith the BRIDGE COMMISSION's name. stages pointed way new architecture.5Like Le Corbusier's manifesto, Sigfried As the voices of architect and engineers rose in concert from Giedion'soperative history, Space, Time and Architecture (1941), Table 16, did Cret hear the harmonious bridging of antino- particularlyhis chapteron "The Schismbetween Architecture mies that he strove to concretize in his numerous collaborative and Technology,"turns on the bridge.6Giedion's story of the bridge designs? genesis of modern architectureis a tale of bridges and bridg- Paul Cret's designs for the DRB, the first of his many bridge ing that extended from AbrahamDarby's iron bridge at Coal- projects, as well as his theoretical writing on bridges and brookdale of 1779, the site of the separation of architecture bridging, provide a unique vantage point from which to survey and engineering, to Robert Maillart'sreinforced concrete the threshold between architecture and engineering.2 At the bridge at Tavanasaof 1905, the point of their reconciliation. end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth Claimingthat construction,"the subconsciousnessof architec- centuries, the relationship between architecture and engineer- ture," assumed precedence during the nineteenth century, ing was inextricably tied to changing conceptions of history, Giedion argued that a truly modern architecture emerged temporality, and modernity.3 While engineers and their tech- only when architecturereconnected, through engineering, to nological productions participated in defining the predomi- the present.7The embodiment of connection, the bridge was nant conception of temporality through the powerful notion championed as both the site and the metaphorfor this reunifi- of progress, architects, who lacked a clear link with progress, cation.8 were unsure of their relationship to time. Furthermore, these Like the European modernists, American engineers and uncertainties about the connections to both engineering and their apologists in the late nineteenth and early twentieth emerging conceptions of modernity intertwined with more centuries asserted that bridges, unlike architecture,mirrored general apprehensions about shifting notions of threshold and also marked the progress of human civilization.They and boundary. With the rapid professionalization of both articulated a relationship between building and time that architectural and engineering practices and specialization situatedthe bridge at the nexus of a series of discourseson the 258 JSAH / 57:3, SEPTEMBER1998 This content downloaded from 132.216.1.39 on Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:04:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions FIGURE1: Ralph Modjeski, chief engineer, Delaware RiverBridge between Philadelphia,Pennsylvania, and Camden, New Jersey, 1920-1927. Renderingby PaulCret, 1921 tween architecture and the present, and that the bridge of- fered the possibility of a pure, undifferentiated union. Refut- ing the commonly held view that architecture would become truly modern when it shed the burden of history, when it escaped the past and embraced the present, Cret contested the assumption that bridging inherently produces identity. In Towardsa New Architecture,Le Corbusier declaimed: "Let us listen to the counsel of American engineers."" In 1928, in an of the same title, architect Claude a consul- Viaducde Garabit(M. EzrEns) essay Bragdon, REVUEDE L'ANOtE tant on numerous bridge designs, likewise declared: "The DEL'INGtNIEUR engineer, forced to abandon all aid and comfort from the Old ESTHtTIOUE World and the past by reason of the newness of his material ARCHITECTURE (steel) and the novelty of his problems, and therefore subject Par LE CORBUSIER-SAUGNIER to no educational malpractice, has succeeded where the archi- FIGURE2: Le Corbusier, introductory page to the essay entitled "Esthetique de tect, taught only to lie and to steal, has failed."'12By contrast, l'ingenieur-architecture,"L'Esprit nouveau (November 1921). Included is a photo- Paul Cret urged architects "toward a new classicism" that, in graph of Alexandre Gustave Eiffel'sPont de Garabit across the in France, fostering a link between but also preserving the integrity of 1884. Truy.re novelty and tradition, extolled the productive nature of bridg- ing.13 Portraying architects as unaware of advances in technologi- physics and metaphysics of construction. Speaking for engi- cal culture and therefore disengaged from the present had neers, the mathematician, literary critic, and historian of become commonplace in engineering discourse by 1925 when science and technology Archibald Henderson declared: Cret began to call for a "new classicism." As early as 1869, bridge engineer Alfred Pancoast Boller had observed: "It Nowhere in the material world do we find so significant, so continu- would be an interesting, and perhaps a profitable speculation, ously enthralling an image as that of a bridge. From the dawn of to inquire in what manner the separation of the professions creation the bridge was-coeval with man, contemporaneous with the may have produced what is popularly called the 'degeneracy of individual, as with the life of the race, reflecting in all its minute and modern architecture.' "14Seemingly unable to develop a single countless changes the minute and countless changes of human civiliza- style for the modern age, architects wasted time proliferating tion. ... The whole meaning of progress is summed up in the bridge-at "degenerate" revival styles. Architecture, according to this once a daring symbol and a splendid reality.9 view, had slipped out of joint with time. By the second half of So confident were American engineers that one proclaimed: the nineteenth century, it had become anachronistic. "The formal title of the man who exerts a greater influence in "Is not our new leader an engineer, rather than a philolo- the civilized world at the present time than any other human gist or an antiquary?" asked Calvin Woodward, dean of the being.., .is The Supreme Bridge-Builder,-Pontifex Maxi- School of Engineering at George Washington University, in mus.10 1895.15 He continued, "The engineer is by nature an icono- Questioning these prevailing conceptions of the interrela- clast. He has small respect for the traditions. He snaps his tionship of bridges, architecture, engineering, and time, Paul fingers in scorn at all whose chief pride and glory lies in their Cret challenged two fundamental claims: that the schism submission to the 'tyranny of the ancients.' He cares less for between architecture and engineering betrayed a breach be- what he has been than what he may be. His triumphs, his FARNHAM:PAUL CRET 259 This content downloaded from 132.216.1.39 on Fri, 2 Aug 2013 18:04:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions masterpieces, his heroes, his golden age, are all in the future. BATTLING FOR THE BRIDGEHEAD:ARCHITECTS, He walks forward, with his face to the front; not backward, with ENGINEERS,AND PROFESSIONALBOUNDARIES his face to the past.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additional Resources in MSEL Suspension Bridges and Othmar
    Additional Resources in MSEL Suspension Bridges and Othmar Ammann Metropolitan Transit Authority Sate of New York Books Title: Bridging New York [video recording] produced by Great Projects Film Company, Inc. written and produced by Daniel A. Miller. MSEL Call Number Eisenhower AV Center Video A5671 Title: George Washington Bridge [video recording] crossing the Hudson / Mark Daniels and Kaye Wise Whitehead; Metro Channel L.L.C. MSEL Call Number Eisenhower AV Center Video A6055 Title: Six bridges: the legacy of Othmar H. Ammann / Darl Rastorfer. MSEL Call Number Eisenhower Stacks TG25.N5 R37 2000 QUARTO Tips on finding these and more books on structures in the MSEL. http://www.library.jhu.edu/researchhelp/engr/structures/books.html Journal Title: Planning and design of Verrazano Narrows bridge By Ammann, OH In: Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences Articles V. 25 n 6 1963 p 598 MSEL Call Number Moravia Park Q11.N56 Database: Compendex Title: Unusual design problems - 2nd Tacoma narrows bridge - discussion By Ammann, OH In Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers V 114 1949 p 970- 978 MSEL Call Number Gillman TA1.A5 Database: Compendex Title Design and stress condition By: Ammann, OH In: Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers V 112 1947 p 203-219 MSEL Call Number Gilman TA1.A5 Database: Compendex Title: The Eads Bridge Saint Louis, Missouri [by] Howard Smith In: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians Dec., 2000 v.59, n.4, p.559-564 MSEL Call Number Eisenhower Stacks NA1.A75 Database: Avery Index to Architecture Also available on JSTOR Title: For beauty's sake.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bayonne Bridge: Reconstruction of a 1931 Steel Arch
    The Bayonne Bridge: Reconstruction of a 1931 Steel Arch Joseph LoBuono, PE (HDR/WSP) Engineering Symposium Rochester 2018 April 24, 2018 Project Development The Project Challenges Innovation Construction Status Project Development The Port of New York and New Jersey NEW JERSEY BAYONN E BRIDGE NEW YORK Bayonne Bridge History • Designed by Othmar Ammann and Cass Gilbert Also Designed The George Washington Bridge; Triborough Bridge; Bronx - Whitestone; Throgs Neck; and Verrazano- Narrows • Opened to Traffic on November 15, 1931 1,675-foot, Steel Arch Span was the Longest in the World at the Time, and Remained so for 46 years • 1985 Designated a National Historic Civil Engineering Landmark • 2001 National and NJ State Historic Register Eligible (2003 NY Eligible) Existing Main Arch Span Problem: Bayonne Bridge Air Draft Restriction • Existing 151-foot Air Draft • The Expansion of the Panama Canal will Allow for New, Larger, (Post-Panamax) Ships with Increased Clearance Requirements 151 Feet • Taller Ships (up to 200-ft), will not be able to Navigate Beneath the Bayonne Bridge • The Bridge of the Americas (Pacific Approach to Panama Canal), has a 201-foot Clearance • Trends in Shipping (shown in photo) • 8,000 TEU Regina Maersk • 13,000 TEU Emma Maersk Problem: Bayonne Bridge Air Draft Restriction Raise the Roadway Rehabilitate, Retrofit, and Reuse - Arch Full Replacement of Approach Structures The Project Approach Structures: Articulation/Pier Fixity New York (12 spans, 272’ max, 125’ min) New Jersey (14 spans, 252’ max, 171’ min) Approach Structures: Piers Single Pier Combined Pier Tall Pier Main Span Roadway Looking North Existing & New Arch Floor System Challenges Challenges Upgrade 81 Year Old Structure to 2012 Code Cross-Sections: Arch Span – Original Design Cross-Section Comparison Wider Roadway 1930 Live Loading vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosty – Obiekty Inżynierskie Rozpięte Ponad Czasem I Przestrzenią, Cz. 2 ❚ Prof
    Świat Mosty Mosty – obiekty inżynierskie rozpięte ponad czasem i przestrzenią, cz. 2 ❚ prof. dr hab. inż. Kazimierz Flaga, Katedra Budowy Mostów i Tuneli, Politechnika Krakowska „Czym naprawdę jest most?” – dociekał prof. Kazimierz Flaga w wygłoszonym podczas uroczystości nadania mu godno- ści doktora honoris causa Politechniki Krakowskiej wykładzie, którego treść przytoczyliśmy we fragmencie na łamach poprzedniego numeru „Nowoczesnego Budownictwa Inżynieryjnego”. – „Odpowiedź będzie pełna tylko wówczas, jeśli zauważymy, że most to nie tylko rzeczywistość fi zyczna – obiekt, który łącząc brzegi, umożliwia kontakty międzyludzkie, przemieszczanie się ludzi, myśli i idei. Most ma także odniesienie duchowe, jest czymś na kształt tęczy rozpiętej nad przestrzenią i czasem. Most jest więc i jednym, i drugim – ma ważne znaczenie komunikacyjne i transcendentalne. Jest to duch i materia, razem i oddzielnie, tak jak to ujął niemiecki fi lozof Martin Heidegger w eseju Przezwyciężanie metafi zyki: »Most skupia na swój sposób przy sobie Ziemię i Niebo, Istoty Boskie i Śmiertelnych«”. Historia cywilizacji pełna jest przykładów przez całe życie, projektując – przez wła- wspaniałych mostów. Każda kolejna epoka sne biura konstrukcyjne w Pittsburgu wnosiła do mostownictwa nowy styl archi- i Chicago – 42 mosty, głównie stalowe, tektoniczny, doskonalszą konstrukcję, in- na wielkich rzekach Ameryki: Missi- nowacyjne materiały. Budowniczowie mo- sipi (dziewięć), Ohio (sześć), Columbia stów przechodzili do historii. Lista nazwisk (trzy), Hudson (dwa), Delaware (dwa). twórców słynnych przepraw mostowych Swoją działalnością zdobył tak dużą jest długa. W tej części wykładu autor skupił sławę, że w amerykańskiej Encyklopedii uwagę na wspominanych już poprzednio techniki XX wieku jest on wymieniony trzech wybitnych konstruktorach mostów obok takich postaci, jak Th omas Edison stalowych pierwszej połowy XX w.
    [Show full text]
  • First Steps on the American Soil and Stage Portrait of Helena Modrzejewska by Tadeuszajdukiewicz.1880 National Museum in Krakow
    January - February 2018 A Monthly Publication of the U.S. Consulate Krakow Volume XIV. Issue 152 First Steps on the American Soil and Stage Portrait of Helena Modrzejewska by TadeuszAjdukiewicz.1880 National Museum in Krakow In this issue: Helena & Raplh Modjeski Zoom in on America From Modrzejewska to Modjeska Helena Modrzejewska’s first name is present in a num- the “g” into a “j”. He spelled aloud “Modjeska.” “Now,” he ber of different languages, or has related versions such said, “it is quite easy to read, and sounds pretty, I think.” as Elena or Lena, her surname “Modrzejewska”, however, We parted good friends, and I began to make prepara- poses a real challenge to pronounce for any non-native tions for the performance of “Adrienne Lecouvreur.” speaker of the Polish language. It is no wonder then that when Modrzejewska, an already accomplished actress in Modjeska had come to America the previous year (1876) Poland, wanted to pursue her acting career in America, her with her second husband, Count Karol Bozenta Chlapow- name became a concern. It was actor John McCullough ski, and her son, Ralph, from her first marriage, and a few of the California Theater who suggested simplifying it. In friends, including writer Henryk Sienkiewicz (who later won her Memoirs and Impressions, the actress describes the the Noble Prize in Literature in 1905.) This was a politically moment when she changed her name Modrzejewska to driven immigration as the Chlapowskis’ patriotic stand put Modjeska: them in trouble with the authorities in the Russian Partition. After the rehearsal Mr. John McCullough came to speak While their ship neared the American shore, the actress to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayonne Bridge Lesson Plan
    The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Resources for Teachers and Students [Printable and Electronic Versions] The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Resources for Teachers And Students [Printable and Electronic Versions] OVERVIEW/OBJECTIVE: Students will be able to understand and discuss the history of NOTES: the Bayonne Bridge and use science and engineering basics • Key words indicated in to investigate bridge design and test an arch bridge model. Bold are defined in call- out boxes. TARGET GRADE LEVEL: • Teacher-only text Fourth grade instruction, adaptable to higher levels as indicated with Italics. desired in the subjects of Social Studies and Engineering. FOCUS: In Part I, students learn about history of the Bayonne Bridge including the many engineering challenges encountered during the project and the people who helped overcome those challenges. In Part II, students learn engineering concepts to understand how bridges stay up and use these concepts to complete activities on bridge design before applying these concepts to theorize how the Bayonne Bridge works. MATERIALS: • Part I: DVD of “The Bayonne Bridge Documentary” • Part II: 2–4 heavy textbooks or 2 bricks per group; 2 pieces of “cereal box” cardboard or similar, 12 x 8 in; weights (anything small that can be stacked on the structure); red and blue marker, crayon or colored pencil for each student or group. The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Contents Teacher Materials | Part I: History of the Bayonne Bridge . T-1 Teacher Materials | Part II: Bridge Engineering . T-7 Student Materials | Part I: History of the Bayonne Bridge . S-1 Student Materials | Part II: Bridge Engineering .
    [Show full text]
  • The GREAT BRIDGE ARCHITECT/DESIGNER
    1 The GREAT BRIDGE ARCHITECT/DESIGNER (Othmar Ammann left his Mark on New York City) Steve Krar Perhaps no twentieth-century engineer has left a more visible mark on a major city than had Othmar Ammann on New York. His five major bridges bear much of the enormous traffic flow to and from the city. They are beautiful and efficient structures, for Ammann achieved an uncommon harmony of visual elegance, simplicity, and power with practical design. Othmar Ammann Born in Switzerland, Othmar Ammann attended the Federal Polytechnic Institute of Zurich and earned an engineering degree in 1902. He had an interest in and an aptitude for mathematics and physics. Coming to the United States In August of 1907 the Quebec Bridge over the St. Lawrence River in Canada collapsed while under construction. Ammann offered to assist in the investigation of the collapse; his well-written report on the disaster earned him respect in his profession. The Hell Gate Bridge In 1912 Ammann was a chief assistant to Gustav Lindenthal, who was preparing for the great railroad bridge between Queens and Wards Island known as Hell Gate. The span was large; the ultimate design would be the longest arch-type bridge in the world. The rapid tidal currents made impossible to erect scaffolding in the river. The Hell Gate Bridge opened in 1917 and its design communicates rigidity with almost all its weight and outward thrust carried by the lower of the two steel arches. Hudson River Bridge Ammann’s final design for the Hudson River bridge called for a 3,500-foot span twice the length of any existing bridge, between Fort Lee in New Jersey and 179 Street in Manhattan.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Jan Płachta
    POLISH-AMERICAN ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION FOUNDED IN 1934 P.O. Box 241, Northbrook, IL 60065-241, USA ● www.polishengineers.org All members and friends of Polish-American Engineers Association are cordially invited to attend our meeting. DATE: Friday, February 17 th , 2017 TIME: Doors Open 7:30 p.m.; Business Meeting begins 8:00 p.m. PLACE: Copernicus Center Kings Hall 5216 W. Lawrence Avenue Chicago, Illinois SPEAKER: Dr. Jan Płachta TOPIC: “Artysta Betonu i Stali – Mosty Rudolfa Modrzejewskiego” / Artist in Concrete and Steel – The Bridges of Ralph Modjeski Dr. Jan Płachta Dr. Jan Plachta worked for over 30 years for the US Army Corps of Engineers at the Chicago District Office. He graduated with a civil engineering degree from the Technical University in Vienna, Austria. He has MS degree in Structural Engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology and a PhD degree in Soil Mechanics from Politechnika Krakowska in Kraków, Poland. He worked on a great variety of Chicago District flood control projects, performed Dam Safety Inspections and other Corps of Engineers major civil works projects, like Lock and Dam structures on the Mississippi River, Ohio River and Illinois River. He has published numerous technical articles in professional periodicals documenting the accomplishments of engineers of Polish heritage and has made numerous presentations at the Corps of Engineers Conferences, the ASCE, SAME and PAEA meetings. ABSTRACT Dr. Jan Płachta, distinguished Member of the PAEA, will discuss his recently-published book entitled “Artysta Betonu i Stali – Mosty Rudolfa Modrzejewskiego” (currently only in Polish) about the patron of the PAEA Scholarship, Ralph Modjeski (presentation in English).
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges in Arizona and Their Engineers
    Historic Bridges in Arizona and Their Engineers November 3, 2011 NACE / AACE Conference Presented by: Jerry A. Cannon, PE, SE Patricia D. Morris Who Designed Arizona Bridges Mill Ave Construction Site 1928 – Photo Hoffman Collection - (Mary Lou Vaughan) Mexican American War 1848 Treaty of Hidalgo & Guadalupe Gadsden Purchase 1853 – Southern Part of AZ Northern Boundary of AZ along 37th Parallel Separated from New Mexico by 1863 Federal Organic Act Arizona Territory 1863 1846 – Cooke’s Wagon Road (Ocean to Ocean Highway US 80) Was the southern route crossing the Colorado River in Yuma Built by Capt Cooke and the Mormon Brigade during the war with Mexico. Largely paralleled the Gila River Arizona Territory Two Major Transportation Routes 1859 – Beale’s Road (Old Trails Highway and US 66) Was the northern route that crossed the Colorado River at Topock. Route was built before the construction of the railroad in 1883 Road maintenance was performed by travelers Bridges were non existent Arizona Territory Two Major Transportation Routes Alchesay Canyon Bridge (1905) Solomonville Road Overpass (1907) Lowell Arch Bridge (1911) Cameron Bridge (1911) Only Remaining Bridges from the Arizona Territory (1863-1912) Arizona’s Historic Bridges J.B. Girand 1909 - 1912 Arizona’s First and Only Territorial Engineer Florence Bridge Replacement; Lowell Bridge US80, Ash Ave. Bridge Over Salt River in Tempe Lamar Cobb 1912 Arizona’s First State Highway Engineer Antelope Hill Bridge – Yuma and Aqua Fria River Bridge Daniel Luten 1914 Canyon Padre Bridge – Canyon
    [Show full text]
  • Ralph Modjeski by Frank Griggs, Jr., Dist
    Great achievements notable structural engineers Ralph Modjeski By Frank Griggs, Jr., Dist. M. ASCE, D. Eng., P.E., P.L.S. odjeski, (ne. Rudolphe his assistant. He then went into partnership could not agree on a Modrzejewska) was born in for a short time with J. F. Nickerson, followed specific recommen- Cracow, Poland on January 27, by his becoming Chief Engineer on a Bridge dation, as Vautelet 1861. His mother was an inter- across the Mississippi River at Rock Island. recommended one of Mnationally known actress who encouraged him It was the fourth bridge at this site and was a the tenders on his own Ralph Modjeski to become a concert pianist. But, at an early age, seven span railroad and roadway bridge with design and Macdonald he determined he would become a civil engineer. a swing span over a set of locks. and Modjeski recommended a design by the St. His family came to the United States to attend In 1902, Modjeski went into partnership Lawrence Bridge® Company. Vautelet left the the Centennial Celebration in Philadelphia and with Alfred Noble forming the firm of Noble Board and was replaced by Lt. Col. Charles start an orange farm near Anaheim, California. and Modjeski with one of their largest proj- Monsarrat and Macdonald was replaced by C. His mother continued her acting career and ects being a cantilever across the Mississippi at C. Schnieder (STRUCTURE, January 2011). Modjeski attended schools in the San Francisco Thebes, Illinois. After this bridge was finished, It was these three engineers who oversaw the area for a short time.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges Historic Bridges 397 Survey Report for Historic Highway Bridges
    6 HISTORIC BRIDGES HISTORIC BRIDGES 397 SURVEY REPORT FOR HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES HIGHWAY FOR HISTORIC REPORT SURVEY 1901-1920 PERIOD By the turn of the century, bridge design, as a profession, had sufficiently advanced that builders ceased erecting several of the less efficient truss designs such as the Bowstring, Double Intersection Pratt, or Baltimore Petit trusses. Also, the formation of the American Bridge Company in 1901 eliminated many small bridge companies that had been scrambling for recognition through unique truss designs or patented features. Thus, after the turn of the century, builders most frequently erected the Warren truss and Pratt derivatives (Pratt, Parker, Camelback). In addition, builders began to erect concrete arch bridges in Tennessee. During this period, counties chose to build the traditional closed spandrel design that visually evoked the form of the masonry arch. Floods in 1902 and 1903 that destroyed many bridges in the state resulted in counties going into debt to undertake several bridge replacement projects. One of the most concentrated bridge building periods at a county level occurred shortly before World War I as a result of legislation the state passed in 1915 that allowed counties to pass bond issues for road and bridge construction. Consequently, several counties initiated large road construction projects, for example, Anderson County (#87, 01-A0088-03.53) and Unicoi County (#89, 86-A0068- 00.89). This would be the last period that the county governments were the most dominant force in road and bridge construction. This change in leadership occurred due to the creation of the Tennessee State Highway Department in 1915 and the passage of the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: Six Bridges: the Legacy of Othmar Ammann
    Swiss American Historical Society Review Volume 37 Number 1 Article 5 2-2001 Book Review: Six Bridges: the Legacy of Othmar Ammann Nicole Butz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review Part of the European History Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Butz, Nicole (2001) "Book Review: Six Bridges: the Legacy of Othmar Ammann," Swiss American Historical Society Review: Vol. 37 : No. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sahs_review/vol37/iss1/5 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Swiss American Historical Society Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Butz: Book Review: Six Bridges: the Legacy of Othmar Ammann IV. REVIEWS Darl Rastorfer, Six Bridges: The Legacy of Othmar Ammann. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000. ix, 188 pp. Appendix, bibliographical references, glossary, illustrations. $39.95. Cloth. Around his eightieth birthday, the Swiss-American engineer, Othmar Ammann moved to an apartment at the top of the Carlyle Hotel in Manhattan. One imagines that he, gazing down on the city below, could have only marveled at how much its landscape had changed since his arrival there fifty­ odd years earlier. He also could have delighted in his own accomplishments, the vistas from his new home offering visual confirmation of his professional successes. With views in three directions, Ammann would have seen virtually all of "his bridges": the George Washington to the north; the Triborough, Bronx-Whitestone, and Throgs Neck to the east; and the Bayonne and Verrazano-Narrows to, respectively, the southwest and south.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement, Roadway Bridges of California
    Cover Images: Top to bottom, left to right: San Francisco / Oakland Bay Bridge, November 1936; US Highway 101 on the South Fork of the Eel River, December 1959; US Troops crossing a narrow bridge (unknown location), November 1940; East Shore Freeway, March 1950; Bess Avenue and Frazier Street Overcrossing, San Bernardino Freeway, January 1958; Four Level Interchange, Los Angeles, September 1949. These photographs were taken from the California Highways and Public Works published by the California Department of Public Works. The background engineering drawing was taken from the Bridge Planning and Design Manual Volume II published by the State of California Department of Public Works, Division of Highways, 1955 revised through 1966. For individuals with sensory disabilities this document is available in alternate formats. Please call or write to Andrew Hope, Caltrans Environmental Program, Mail Station 27, P.O. Box 942874, Sacramento, CA, 94274-0001. (916) 654-5611 Voice, or use the CA Relay Service TTY number 1-800-735-2929. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY................................................................................. 1 1.1. POSSIBLE SIGNIFICANCE OF BRIDGES UNDER CRITERIA A AND C.................................... 3 1.2. BRIDGES IN HISTORIC DISTRICTS..................................................................................... 3 1.3. RESEARCH METHODS AND PREPARER QUALIFICATIONS.................................................. 4 2. CALIFORNIA BRIDGES 1936 TO 1959: IMPORTANT EVENTS AND TRENDS IN
    [Show full text]