Diagnosing Angola's WASH Sector

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diagnosing Angola's WASH Sector WATER GLOBAL PRACTICE Diagnosing Angola’s WASH Sector An Urgent Call to Action DIAGNOSTIC REPORT Camilo Lombana Cordoba, Luis A. Andrés, Lucrécio A. M. da Costa, and Crystal Fenwick About the Water Global Practice Launched in 2014, the World Bank Group’s Water Global Practice brings together financing, knowledge, and implementation in one platform. By combining the Bank’s global knowledge with country investments, this model generates more firepower for transformational solutions to help countries grow sustainably. Please visit us at www.worldbank.org/water or follow us on Twitter at @WorldBankWater. About GWSP This publication received the support of the Global Water Security & Sanitation Partnership (GWSP). GWSP is a multidonor trust fund administered by the World Bank’s Water Global Practice and supported by Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Austria’s Federal Ministry of Finance, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Denmark’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Netherlands’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Switzerland’s State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, U.K. Department for International Development, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Please visit us at www.worldbank.org/gwsp or follow us on Twitter #gwsp. Diagnosing Angola’s WASH Sector An Urgent Call to Action DIAGNOSTIC REPORT Camilo Lombana Cordoba, Luis A. Andrés, Lucrécio A. M. da Costa, and Crystal Fenwick © 2021 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Please cite the work as follows: Lombana Cordoba, Camilo, Luis A. Andrés, Lucrécio A. M. da Costa, and Crystal Fenwick. 2021. “Diagnosing Angola’s WASH Sector: An Urgent Call to Action—Diagnostic Report.” World Bank, Washington, DC. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: pubrights@ worldbank.org Cover design: Owen Design Co. Cover photos: Ministry of Energy and Water, Government of Angola (left and right); pxfuel (center) Executive Summary photos: Ministry of Energy and Water, Government of Angola. Contents Acknowledgments xi Abbreviations xiii Executive Summary xvii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Access to Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene in Angola 7 2.1 Measuring Access: Development Goal Indicators 8 2.2 Change in Access to WASH Services Over Time 8 2.3 Access to WASH Services in Urban and Rural Areas 10 2.4 Safely Managed Drinking Water and Sanitation 13 2.5 Access to WASH Services by Province 17 2.6 Access to WASH Services by Socioeconomic Characteristics 21 2.7 WASH Services In Schools 28 2.8 Concluding Remarks 29 Notes 30 Chapter 3 Spotlight on Urban WASH: A Tale of Three Cities 33 3.1 Access to Household WASH Services in Urban Areas 34 3.2 Sanitation Service Provision 39 3.3 Water and Sanitation Spending 44 3.4 Access to WASH in Institutions 45 3.5 Concluding Remarks 49 Notes 50 Chapter 4 WASH Services and Child Health Outcomes 53 4.1 Childhood Health and Mortality in Angola 54 4.2 Poverty Risk Model 56 4.3 Results 59 4.4 Spotlight on Neglected Tropical Diseases 69 4.5 Concluding Remarks 75 Notes 76 Diagnosing Angola’s WASH Sector: An Urgent Call to Action iii Chapter 5 WASH Sector Governance 79 5.1 WASH Sector Reform 80 5.2 Evolution of WASH Sector Governance 82 5.3 Methodological Framework 83 5.4 Roles and Responsibilities 87 5.5 Constraints and Bottlenecks to Effective Service Delivery 100 5.6 Concluding Remarks 105 Notes 105 Chapter 6 A Review of Tariffs and Subsidies 107 6.1 The Tariff Framework 108 6.2 The Subsidies Framework 115 6.3 Operational Efficiency of Provincial Utilities 119 6.4 Concluding Remarks 125 Notes 126 Chapter 7 Building Resilience: A Case Study of Two Water Utilities 129 7.1 Methodology 130 7.2 Results 132 7.3 Concluding Remarks 140 Notes 141 Chapter 8 Public Expenditure Review 143 8.1 Trends and Forecasts in Total Public Expenditure 143 8.2 Trends in Public Expenditure on the Infrastructure Sector 148 8.3 WASH Sector Funding 149 8.4 WASH Expenditure by Province 159 8.5 Cost-Effective Means of Improving Service Delivery 161 8.6 Concluding Remarks 163 Notes 165 Chapter 9 Directions for Future Work 167 Bibliography 171 Appendix A Access to Water Supply, Sanitation, and Hygiene Across Provinces 181 Appendix B Sanitation Primary Data Collection Methodology 185 iv Diagnosing Angola’s WASH Sector: An Urgent Call to Action Appendix C Summary of Key Angolan Legislation Relevant to the WASH Sector 193 Appendix D Evolution of Angola’s Legal Regime in Relation to Tariff Setting 199 Appendix E Principles of Tariff Regulation 205 Appendix F Tariff-Setting Procedures 209 Appendix G The Political Economy of Subsidies 213 Appendix H Overview of Angola’s Provincial Water and Sanitation Companies 217 Appendix I Expenditure per Capita by Central and Provincial Governments, by Subsector, 2014–18 219 Boxes Box 2.1. National Water Quality Standards in Angola 15 Box 2.2. The Importance of Data Collection and Harmonized Household Surveys 16 Box 2.3. Peri-Urban Settlements 19 Box 2.4. Menstrual Hygiene Management and Educational Attainment of Girls 28 Box 4.1. An Example of an Integrated WASH Intervention: Angola’s Contingent Emergency Response Component for Drought 74 Box 5.1. Drinking Water Quality Legislation 93 Box 5.2. A Case for Cross-Sectoral Collaboration 94 Box 5.3. WASH Service Delivery in Luanda 98 Box 5.4. Opportunities for Public-Private Participation 103 Box 6.1. Operational Efficiency of EPAL 120 Box 6.2. Operational Efficiency of ASEP Huambo 122 Box 6.3. Operational Efficiency of ASEP Huíla 123 Box 6.4. Operational Efficiency of ASEP Uíge 124 Box 8.1. The More Things Change, the More they Stay the Same 144 Box 8.2. Dilemmas in Analyzing Public Expenditure 148 Box 8.3. Overseas Development Assistance 151 Box 8.4. Recent Financial Support for Sanitation 153 Diagnosing Angola’s WASH Sector: An Urgent Call to Action v Figure Figure 2.1. The New JMP Ladders for Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene 9 Figure 2.2. Change in Country-Level Access to Improved WASH Facilities Over Time 10 Figure 2.3. Change in Access to an Improved Drinking Water Source Over Time in Urban and Rural Areas 11 Figure 2.4. Change in Access to Improved Sanitation Facilities Over Time in Urban and Rural Areas 11 Figure 2.5. Share of Population Practicing Open Defecation by Location 12 Figure 2.6. Share of Population Relying on Surface Water by Location 12 Figure 2.7. On-Site Management of Excreta by Location 14 Figure 2.8. Accessibility of Water by Location 15 Figure 2.9. Household-Level Treatment of Drinking Water by Location 16 Figure 2.10. Percentage Share of Population with Access (Left) and Number of People Without Access (Right) to at Least Basic Water 18 Figure 2.11. Percentage Share of Population (Left) and Number of People (Right) Relying on Surface Water for Drinking 18 Figure 2.12. Percentage Share of Population with Access (Left) and Number of People Without Access (Right) to Improved Water on Premises 19 Figure 2.13. Percentage Share of Population with Access (Left) and Number of People Without Access (Right) to at Least Basic Sanitation 20 Figure 2.14. Percentage Share of Population (Left) and Number of People (Right) Who Practice Open Defecation 20 Figure 2.15. Percentage Share of Population with Access (Left) and Number of People Without Access (Right) to at Least Basic Hygiene 21 Figure 2.16. Access to Water by Gender of Household Head 21 Figure 2.17. Gender and Water Collection Responsibilities 22 Figure 2.18. Access to Sanitation, by Gender of Household Head 22 Figure 2.19. Access to Hygiene, by Gender of Household Head 23 Figure 2.20. Access to Water by Educational Attainment of Household Head 23 Figure 2.21. Access to Sanitation, by Educational Attainment of Household Head 24 Figure 2.22. Access to Hygiene, by Educational Attainment of Household Head 24 Figure 2.23. Access to Water, by Wealth Quintile 25 Figure 2.24. Access to Sanitation, by Wealth Quintile 25 Figure 2.25. Access to Hygiene, by Wealth Quintile 26 Figure 2.26. Access to Water, by Age of Household Head 26 Figure 2.27. Access to Sanitation, by Age of Household Head 27 Figure 2.28. Access to Hygiene, by Age of Household Head 27 Figure 3.1. Citywide Access to Drinking Water, by Service Provider 35 Figure 3.2. Access to Piped Water, by City and Area 35 vi Diagnosing Angola’s WASH Sector: An Urgent Call to Action Figure 3.3.
Recommended publications
  • Angola: Extremism and Terrorism
    Angola: Extremism and Terrorism In March 2017, Kassim Tajideen, a prominent Hezbollah financier, was arrested on an INTERPOL warrant and extradited to the United States on charges of fraud, money laundering, and violating global terrorism sanctions regulations. Tajideen, a U.S.-designated terrorist, had been living in Angola since 1990, where he operated a business empire that he used to contribute tens of millions of dollars to Hezbollah. (Sources: IDEX, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington Post) Overview Angola has enjoyed relative peace and stability since 2002, after decades of conflict. Angola gained independence from Portugal in 1975 after a protracted guerrilla struggle for independence that began in the 1950s. Nonetheless, the two rival independence movements, the People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA) and the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA) subsequently began to compete for power, launching a 27-year-long civil war that did not end until 2002. The MPLA and UNITA have since functioned as political parties, though the MPLA has dominated the country’s politics. MPLA member Joao Lourenco became Angola’s president in 2017 following the 38-year presidency of MPLA member Jose Eduardo dos Santos. (Sources: BBC News, BBC News) The main threat of terrorism in Angola stems from a separatist movement in the oil-rich northern province of Cabinda. According to the U.S. Department of State’s Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC), the Front for the Liberation of the Enclave of Cabinda (FLEC) is the only active group that has carried out terrorist attacks in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Africa June 2019
    IMPORTANT NOTICE: The information in this PDF file is subject to Fitch Solutions Group Limited’s full copyright and entitlements as defined and protected by international law. The contents of the file are for the sole use of the addressee. All content in this file is owned and operated by Fitch Solutions Group Limited and the copying or distribution of this file, internally or externally, is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission and consent of Fitch Solutions Group Limited. If you wish to distribute this file, please email the Subscriptions Department at [email protected], providing details of your subscription and the number of recipients you wish to forward or distribute this information to. This report from Fitch Solutions Macro Research is a product of Fitch Solutions Group Ltd, UK Company registration number 08789939 (‘FSG’). FSG is an affiliate of Fitch Ratings Inc. (‘Fitch Ratings’). FSG is solely responsible for the content of this report, without any input from Fitch Ratings. Copyright © 2019 Fitch Solutions Group Limited. DISCLAIMER All information contained in this publication has been researched and compiled from sources believed to be accurate and reliable at the time of publishing. However, in view of the natural scope for human and/or mechanical error, either at source or during production, Fitch Solutions Group Limited accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage resulting from errors, inaccuracies or omissions affecting any part of the publication. All information is provided without warranty, and Fitch Solutions Group Limited makes no representation of warranty of any kind as to the accuracy or completeness of any information hereto contained.
    [Show full text]
  • Angola and China: 1 a Pragmatic Partnership
    Angola and China: 1 A Pragmatic Partnership Indira Campos and Alex Vines1 Introduction Angola has enjoyed a period of sustained peace since April 2002 and is preparing for legislative elections in 2008—the first since 1992. From having one of the most protracted conflicts in Africa, Angola has within five years become one of the most successful economies in sub-Saharan Af- rica. Fuelled by record-high international oil prices and robust growth in both the oil and non-oil sector, Angola has experienced exceptionally high growth rates in recent years. In 2006, real GDP reached 18.6 percent, following the already impressive 20.6 percent in 2005. The IMF projects GDP growth to remain high at 23.4 percent in 2007 and 26.6 percent in 2008. Meanwhile, inflation has fallen from over 300 percent in 1999 to 12 percent in 2006, and surging oil revenues have led to large fiscal and external current account surpluses.2 With the war now over, rapid post-conflict reconstruction has become the government’s prior- ity. The People’s Republic of China (China) has in particular played an important role in assisting these efforts. Chinese financial and technical assistance has kick-started over 100 projects in the areas of energy, water, health, education, telecommunications, fisheries, and public works. On the occasion of Chinese prime minister Wen Jibao’s visit to Angola in June 2006, Angolan president Eduardo dos Santos described bilateral relations as being “mutually advantageous” partnerships that were “pragmatic” and had no “political preconditions.”3 With 2008 marking the 25th anniversary of the establishment of bilateral relations between the two countries, this paper takes a fresh look at the issue of Angola and China’s partnership.4 The study benefits from fieldwork carried out in Angola in September 2007 and January 2008 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture As a Tool for Development in Angola
    Vol. 8(50), pp. 6642-6650, 26 December, 2013 DOI: 10.5897/AJAR10.033 African Journal of Agricultural ISSN 1991-637X ©2013 Academic Journals Research http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR Review Agriculture as a tool for development in Angola Jose de Assuncao Sambo Tomas Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. Accepted 21 March, 2011 After a long period of war in Angola, agriculture can contribute significantly to achieving higher sustainable economic growth and greater rural development in all 18 provinces. The Minister of Agriculture in Angola manages Ministry of Agriculture and Development Rural (MADR) including the Forest Sector, which is designated as the Institute of Development Forest (IDF). The most important is the recuperation of infrastructure, trade liberalization and other economic policy reforms to promote agriculture and increased rural welfare in Angola. It should be given more dynamics based on regional economic cooperation, or regional convergence. The increase in agricultural trade in Angola through open economy by the region, with appreciable-too-large infrastructure, agricultural sectors and with revealed international and regional–inter-regional comparative advantage in the agricultural production and yields, agricultural land, agricultural inputs, dairy products, cereal grains, and agricultural raw materials is the most appropriate avenue for improving agricultural growth and its contribution to rural development. Key words: Revealed comparative advantage,
    [Show full text]
  • ANGOLA and CHINA a Pragmatic Partnership
    ANGOLA AND CHINA A Pragmatic Partnership Working Paper Presented at a CSIS Conference, “Prospects for Improving U.S.-China-Africa Cooperation,” December 5, 2007 Indira Campos and Alex Vines Chatham House, London March 2008 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decisionmakers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, DC. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn became chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in 1999, and John J. Hamre has led CSIS as its president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2008 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 775-3119 Fax: (202) 775-3199 Web: www.csis.org ANGOLA AND CHINA A Pragmatic Partnership Indira Campos and Alex Vines1 Introduction Angola has enjoyed a period of sustained peace since April 2002 and is preparing for legislative elections in 2008—the first since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Broadcast Information Portal Creative Common License
    Techniques For Information Research Written By David Childers www.radiosolution.info www.BroadcastingWorld.Com Global Broadcast Information Portal Creative Common License This body of work is released under the Attribution-ShareAlike version 3.0, Creative Common License. The work may be freely distributed or modified for commercial or non commercial purposes. If this work is modified, compliance with the Attribution-ShareAlike version 3.0, Creative Common License is required. These requirements include: - Any derivatives of this work must be attributed to David Childers. - Any derivatives of this work must reference any additional sources that may be used. - Alterations, transforming, or building upon this work requires distributing the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license. For the complete legal code, please refer here: http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode Cover graphic http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schlagwortkatalog.jpg Foreword graphic http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hazy_Crazy_Sunrise.jpg Voltaire graphic http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jean_Sim%C3%A9on_Chardin_-_The_Attributes_of_Art_- _WGA04781.jpg Back graphic http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BATCO_facsimile.agr.tif Foreword Greetings once again, With the continued growth in information and data, knowing how to find this valuable treasure is vitally essential for the successful operation of a business or the completion of any project. Many resources exist that can be used for information research, and it is up to the individual to make the best use of these extensive options that are available. Knowledge is power, and knowing where and how to access that information is the key.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Democracy Versus Autocracy in Environmental Policy-Making Using Six African Cases
    The Effect of Democracy versus Autocracy in Environmental Policy-making using Six African Cases Peace and Development Studies Bachelor Thesis 2FU33E Tutor: Lennart Wohlgemuth Cajsa Andersson [email protected] Växjö 2018-05-23 Peace and Development Studies Cajsa Andersson 2FU33E Abstract As climate change continues to permeate the current political discourse and its effects becomes increasingly visible, the way countries respond to the situation is crucial for determining the extent of future environmental degradation. The Paris Agreement is an attempt to mitigate and adapt to the situation, however the western values tied to it have been criticised. The effectiveness of democracy in environmental protection has been questioned, especially its ties to capitalism and individualism. This thesis uses the theory of authoritarian environmentalism to investigate this debate and see whether the claims have any legitimacy in the context of the Paris Agreement and the promises made in relation to it. This thesis is a structured focused comparison which compares the policies and projects in three democratic and three autocratic African countries in close geographical proximity and similar environmental situations, to investigate if and in what way the type of government affects the promises made, and whether they are kept, to the Paris Agreement and its signatories. The indicators used for the thesis include policies and internationally funded projects, due to their accessibility, however it is worth noting that they only give a crude approximation of the activities and ambition in the countries, with several others having important roles. The quality of the six countries’ Intended Nationally Determined Contributions is investigated and followed up with an evaluation of some of the projects active to examine if the countries are implementing their promised efforts, already in these early, yet important, stages of the Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid Office of Food for Peace Food Security Desk Review for Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo
    USAID OFFICE OF FOOD FOR PEACE FOOD SECURITY DESK REVIEW FOR KASAI OCCIDENTAL AND KASAI ORIENTAL, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO SEPTEMBER 2015 This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the support of the Office of Food for Peace, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance, and the Office of Health, Infectious Diseases, and Nutrition, Bureau for Global Health, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), under terms of Cooperative Agreement No. No. AID-OAA- A-12-00005, through the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA), managed by FHI 360. The contents are the responsibility of FHI 360 and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Recommended citation: Murphy, Emmet; Glaeser, Laura; Maalouf-Manasseh, Zeina; and Collison, Deborah Kortso. 2015. USAID Office of Food for Peace Food Security Desk Review for Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo. Washington, DC: FHI 360/FANTA. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) FHI 360 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009-5721 T 202-884-8000 F 202-884-8432 [email protected] www.fantaproject.org ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors of the USAID Office of Food for Peace Food Security Desk Review for Kasai Occidental and Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo wish to thank the staff of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)/Office of Food for Peace (FFP), USAID/DRC, and other USAID/Washington staff for their assistance in providing valuable information for the desk review, especially Marisa Traniello and Marcel Ntumba (USAID/FFP), and Shannon Rogers and Dieudonné Mbuka (USAID/DRC).
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. and Chinese Engagement in Africa
    U.S. and Chinese Engagement in Africa Prospects for Improving U.S.-China-Africa Cooperation Report of a December 5–6, 2007, conference cosponsored by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, China Institute for International Studies, and Stockholm International Peace Research Institute 1800 K Street NW | Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 PROJECT DIRECTOR E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org J. Stephen Morrison EDITOR Jennifer Cooke CONTRIBUTORS Indira Campos Michael Chege Pat Utomi Alex Vines July 2008 ISBN 978-0-89206-538-7 CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & Ë|xHSKITCy065387zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES U.S. and Chinese Engagement in Africa Prospects for Improving U.S.-China-Africa Cooperation Report of a December 5–6, 2007, conference cosponsored by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, China Institute for International Studies, and Stockholm International Peace Research Institute PROJECT DIRECTOR J. Stephen Morrison EDITOR Jennifer Cooke CONTRIBUTORS Indira Campos Michael Chege Pat Utomi Alex Vines July 2008 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and Inter- national Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decisionmak- ers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • African Union
    African Union BACKGROUND GUIDE Vancouver Model United Nations The Nineteenth Annual Session | February 14–16, 2020 Dear Delegates, Steven Long Co-Secretary-General My name is Kai Choi, and I would like to welcome you to the African Union. I am currently a junior at St. George’s School and this is my fifth year in the world of Model UN. After Alex Shojania sitting through my first two conferences in a deeply-uncomfortable silence, I finally Co-Secretary-General warmed up to what MUN could offer me: a chance to learn more deeply about the world that I live in and the ways that people can collaborate to solve problems. The African Union has always held a special place in my heart; other than being the first Jessica Lin committee I participated in, I also happened to live in Lagos, Nigeria for several years. Chief of Staff Although I wasn’t explicitly aware of many of the continent’s issues while I was there, they certainly resonated with me in the context of Model UN. Albert Chen Director-General With that in mind, I hope that all of you walk away from this experience with a better understanding of Africa, which can be a very easy place to caricature or generalize. Although the issues that the continent faces, such as the prevalence of political instability, are certainly real and devastating, it also has the potential to become an economic Jamin Feng powerhouse in the coming years, perhaps via increased agricultural investment or foreign USG General Assemblies investments. Africa has had an interesting past, but I would like for you to consider its future.
    [Show full text]