DOCSLIB.ORG

Piano Comunale Di Protezione Civile

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Piano Comunale Di Protezione Civile REGIONE PIEMONTE PROVINCIA DI TORINO Centro Operativo Misto (C.O.M.) di Susa CITTA’ DI SUSA PIANO COMUNALE DI PROTEZIONE CIVILE Relazione di analisi e progetto di Piano Marzo 2006 Indice PREMESSA – RIFERIMENTI GENERALI E METODOLOGICI................................................................ 9 1 SCELTA METODOLOGICA DI LAVORO E FASE DI ACQUISIZIONE DEI DATI DISPONIBILI........................................................................................................................................................ 9 2 LA STRUTTURA DEL PIANO ............................................................................................................... 11 3 CENSIMENTO DEI DATI DI BASE ACQUISITI................................................................................ 15 PARTE I – INQUADRAMENTO TERRITORIALE E MODELLO DEL TERRITORIO......................... 17 4 CENNI DESCRITTIVI DELL’AREA DI STUDIO ............................................................................... 17 5 DATI NUMERICI DI INQUADRAMENTO - CITTÀ DI SUSA.......................................................... 21 5.1 DATI GEOGRAFICI DI BASE .................................................................................................................. 21 5.2 SEDE MUNICIPALE ............................................................................................................................... 22 5.3 POPOLAZIONE ..................................................................................................................................... 22 5.4 PRINCIPALI AMBITI DI INSEDIAMENTO ................................................................................................. 23 6 ELEMENTI FISICI CARATTERIZZANTI, DOTAZIONI INFRASTRUTTURALI, RISORSE TECNICHE, LOGISTICHE ED OPERATIVE DEL COMUNE DI SUSA .................................................. 24 6.1 RETE IDROGRAFICA E RISORSE IDRICHE .............................................................................................. 24 6.1.1 Descrizione generale della rete idrografica.................................................................................. 24 6.1.2 Punti di monitoraggio dei corsi d’acqua....................................................................................... 27 6.2 DOTAZIONI INFRASTRUTTURALI ......................................................................................................... 28 6.2.1 Infrastrutture di trasporto ............................................................................................................. 28 6.2.1.1 Rete stradale principale ....................................................................................................................... 28 6.2.1.2 Manufatti............................................................................................................................................. 29 6.2.1.3 Stazioni/Nodi di collegamento ............................................................................................................ 30 6.2.1.4 Enti gestori delle reti e delle infrastrutture di trasporto ....................................................................... 31 6.2.2 Reti tecnologiche e servizi pubblici - Enti gestori ......................................................................... 32 6.3 RISORSE TECNICHE , LOGISTICHE ED OPERATIVE .................................................................................. 33 6.3.1 Strutture operative locali di Protezione Civile presenti nell’area di studio.................................. 33 6.3.1.1 Organismi a livello regionale e provinciale......................................................................................... 33 6.3.1.2 Vigili del Fuoco................................................................................................................................... 33 6.3.1.3 Carabinieri........................................................................................................................................... 33 6.3.1.4 Corpo Forestale dello Stato ................................................................................................................. 33 6.3.1.5 Polizia di Stato .................................................................................................................................... 34 6.3.1.6 Guardia di Finanza .............................................................................................................................. 34 6.3.1.7 Croce Rossa Italiana............................................................................................................................ 34 6.3.1.8 Soccorso Alpino e Speleologico.......................................................................................................... 34 6.3.1.9 Amministrazione Comunale Città di Susa........................................................................................... 34 6.3.2 Organizzazioni di volontariato operanti in Protezione Civile presenti nell’area di studio........... 35 6.3.3 Materiali e mezzi disponibili di proprietà delle strutture operative locali di Protezione Civile ... 36 6.3.4 Strutture sanitarie e socio-assistenziali......................................................................................... 37 6.3.4.1 Azienda Sanitaria Locale..................................................................................................................... 37 6.3.4.2 Strutture Ospedaliere........................................................................................................................... 37 6.3.4.3 Farmacie.............................................................................................................................................. 37 6.3.4.4 Case di riposo...................................................................................................................................... 37 6.4 TABELLA RIASSUNTIVA DEI BERSAGLI E DELLE RISORSE A LIVELLO COMUNALE ................................. 38 PARTE II – ANALISI DEI RISCHI DEL TERRITORIO E MODELLO PREVENTIVO......................... 45 7 IPOTESI DI RISCHIO ............................................................................................................................. 45 7.1 I RISCHI PREVALENTI DEL TERRITORIO DI SUSA .................................................................................. 45 7.2 RISCHIO IDROLOGICO E GEOLOGICO .................................................................................................... 49 7.2.1 Descrizione del rischio idrologico e geologico............................................................................. 49 7.2.2 Modalità e caratteristiche del rischio idrologico e geologico sul territorio della Città di Susa... 50 7.2.3 Scenario di evento – rischio idrologico......................................................................................... 55 7.3 RISCHIO LEGATO AD EVENTI METEOROLOGICI ECCEZIONALI ............................................................... 56 7.3.1 Descrizione del rischio meteorologico.......................................................................................... 56 7.3.2 Modalità e caratteristiche del rischio meteorologico sul territorio della Città di Susa................ 58 7.4 RISCHIO SISMICO ................................................................................................................................. 60 7.4.1 Descrizione del rischio sismico ..................................................................................................... 60 7.4.2 Modalità e caratteristiche del rischio sismico sul territorio della Città di Susa........................... 62 7.5 RISCHIO ASTEROIDI ............................................................................................................................. 65 7.5.1 Descrizione del rischio asteroidi................................................................................................... 65 7.5.2 Modalità e caratteristiche del rischio asteroidi sul territorio della Città di Susa......................... 66 7.6 RISCHIO DIGHE .................................................................................................................................... 68 7.6.1 Descrizione del rischio dighe ........................................................................................................ 68 7.6.2 Modalità e caratteristiche del rischio dighe sul territorio della Città di Susa.............................. 69 7.6.3 Scenario di evento – rischio dighe ................................................................................................ 71 7.7 RISCHIO CHIMICO –INDUSTRIALE ........................................................................................................ 72 7.7.1 Descrizione del rischio chimico-industriale.................................................................................. 72 7.7.2 Modalità e caratteristiche del rischio chimico-industriale sul territorio della Città di Susa........ 73 7.8 RISCHIO NUCLEARE ............................................................................................................................. 74 7.8.1 Descrizione del rischio nucleare ................................................................................................... 74 7.8.2 Modalità e caratteristiche del rischio nucleare sul territorio della Città di Susa......................... 75 7.9 RISCHIO INCENDI ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Functions of Mountain Settiembnts in Relation to Their Physical Environment
    THE FUNCTIONS OF MOUNTAIN SETTIEMBNTS IN RELATION TO THEIR PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT RUTH HANNAM ProQuest Number: 10107214 All rights reserved INF0RMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10107214 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.Q. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION THE FUNCTIONS OF MOUNTAIN SETTLEMENTS IN RELATION TO THEIR PHYSICAL ENVIROmŒNT A settlement is an expression of man’s activity, therefore they can be classed according to the predom ant activity in a particular place. The effect of mo conditions on the choice of site and the mode of livi in different types of settlements is discussed, I* Agricultural and Pastoral Settlements, These are the most numerous; the effects of altitu exposure, degree of slope, the nature of soils and la: forms, water supply and type of farming are discussed Examples(personal knowledge),Reichenbach(Kander Valle; and Devoluy in the Alps, Pyrenean Navarre and the Pic< de Europe in Spain, Others,The Val d*Anniviers; the Hunza Valley in the Karakoram; the Altiplano of Bolivia, II, Mining and Other Industrial Settlement, Mining in relation to geology and structure; artif: character of mining towns; areas where they are most important.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Last Glacial Cycle Ice Dynamics in the Alps
    The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-8 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 16 February 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. Modelling last glacial cycle ice dynamics in the Alps Julien Seguinot1, Guillaume Jouvet1, Matthias Huss1, Martin Funk1, Susan Ivy-Ochs2, and Frank Preusser3 1Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland 2Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zürich, Switzerland 3Institute of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Freiburg, Germany Correspondence to: J. Seguinot ([email protected]) Abstract. The European Alps, cradle of pioneer glacial studies, are one of the regions where geological markers of past glaciations are most abundant and well-studied. Such conditions make the region ideal for testing numerical glacier models based on simplified ice flow physics against field-based reconstructions, and vice-versa. 5 Here, we use the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM) to model the entire last glacial cycle (120–0 ka) in the Alps, using horizontal resolutions of 2 and 1 km and up to 576 processors. Climate forcing is derived using present-day climate data from WorldClim and the ERA-Interim reanalysis, and time-dependent temperature offsets from multiple palaeo-climate proxies, among which only the EPICA ice core record yields glaciation during marine oxygen isotope stages 4 (69–62 ka) and 2 (34– 18 ka) spatially and temporally consistent with the geological reconstructions, while the other records used result in excessive 10 early glacial cycle ice cover and a late Last Glacial Maximum. Despite the low variability of this Antarctic-based climate forcing, our simulation depicts a highly dynamic ice sheet, showing that Alpine glaciers may have advanced many times over the foreland during the last glacial cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumble Bees of the Susa Valley (Hymenoptera Apidae)
    Bulletin of Insectology 63 (1): 137-152, 2010 ISSN 1721-8861 Bumble bees of the Susa Valley (Hymenoptera Apidae) Aulo MANINO, Augusto PATETTA, Giulia BOGLIETTI, Marco PORPORATO Di.Va.P.R.A. - Entomologia e Zoologia applicate all’Ambiente “Carlo Vidano”, Università di Torino, Grugliasco, Italy Abstract A survey of bumble bees (Bombus Latreille) of the Susa Valley was conducted at 124 locations between 340 and 3,130 m a.s.l. representative of the whole territory, which lies within the Cottian Central Alps, the Northern Cottian Alps, and the South-eastern Graian Alps. Altogether 1,102 specimens were collected and determined (180 queens, 227 males, and 695 workers) belonging to 30 species - two of which are represented by two subspecies - which account for 70% of those known in Italy, demonstrating the particular value of the area examined with regard to environmental quality and biodiversity. Bombus soroeensis (F.), Bombus me- somelas Gerstaecker, Bombus ruderarius (Mueller), Bombus monticola Smith, Bombus pratorum (L.), Bombus lucorum (L.), Bombus terrestris (L.), and Bombus lapidarius (L.) can be considered predominant, each one representing more than 5% of the collected specimens, 12 species are rather common (1-5% of specimens) and the remaining nine rare (less than 1%). A list of col- lected specimens with collection localities and dates is provided. To illustrate more clearly the altitudinal distribution of the dif- ferent species, the capture locations were grouped by altitude. 83.5% of the samples is also provided with data on the plant on which they were collected, comprising a total of 52 plant genera within 20 plant families.
    [Show full text]
  • Susa Gorge: a Demodulation Reservoir for Pont Ventoux Hydro Power Plant1
    SUSA GORGE: A DEMODULATION RESERVOIR FOR PONT VENTOUX HYDRO POWER PLANT1 Ezio Baldovin Dr. Eng. Geotecna Progetti – Consulting Engineers – Milano Nicola Brizzo Dr. Eng. Iride Energia – Torino ITALY 1. INTRODUCTION Iride Energia S.p.A. (once A.E.M. of Turin S.p.A.) has completed the construction of the new Pont Ventoux-Susa Hydro Power and Pump Plant, now in phase of final acceptance. Located in High Susa Valley, it will substitute two old flowing plants built in 1910 and 1923, doubling the production of electric energy with diurnal operation of the turbines and night repumping of the water. The installed power is 150 MW and the foreseen production is bigger than 400 GWh/year. 1 Gorge de Susa: un réservoir de démodulation pour l’Aménagement hydroélectrique de Pont Ventoux 2. THE HYDRO POWER PLANT The water is diverted at Pont Ventoux from Dora Riparia River, tributary of Po River, with a maximum flow discharge of 34 m3/s and, after an average geodetic jump of about 515 m, it is returned to the same river about 1 km upstream of Susa Town (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 Pont Ventoux – Susa Hydro Power Plant lay-out Plan général de l’Aménagement Hydroélectrique de Pont Ventoux – Susa A Dora Riparia River A Fleuve Dora Riparia B Clarea River B Fleuve Clarea 1 Pont Ventoux gate-structure Dam 1 Traverse de Pont Ventoux 2 Conveyance tunnel 2 Tunnel de dérivation 3 Clarea Basin 3 Bassin de Clarea 4 Pressure tunnel 4 Tunnel en pression 5 Penstock in shaft 5 Conduite forcée en puits 6 Underground power station 6 Usine hydroélectrique souterraine 7 Susa Dam 7 Barrage
    [Show full text]
  • Zona Naturale Di Salvaguardia Della Dora Riparia
    Zona Naturale di Salvaguardia della Dora Riparia CONVENZIONE DI GESTIONE Rev 7 del 10/10/18 Art. 1 – Convenzione per la gestione associata della Zona naturale di Salvaguardia della Dora Riparia Ai sensi dell’art. 30, Testo Unico degli Enti Locali (D. Lgs. n. 267/2000), i Comuni di Almese, Alpignano, Avigliana, Buttigliera Alta, Caselette, Collegno, Pianezza, Rivoli e Rosta si convenzionano per la gestione associata della Zona naturale di Salvaguardia della Dora Riparia. E’ identificata quale Zona naturale di salvaguardia della Dora Riparia il territorio indicato con la sigla “z4” all’art. 52bis e perimetrato nelle Tavole nn. 75-78, alla scala 1:25.000 allegate al testo coordinato della Legge Regionale n. 19/2009, Testo unico sulla tutela delle aree naturali e della biodiversità. Art. 2 - Finalità e funzioni La Convenzione ha per scopo l’organizzazione della gestione amministrativa, tecnica, di pianificazione, promozione e valorizzazione della Zona naturale di salvaguardia individuata all’art. 1. In particolare, tramite la presente Convenzione, i Comuni sottoscrittori si propongono di organizzare la gestione associata della Zona naturale di salvaguardia. Scopi e finalità della gestione associata sono: Per seguire e garantire le finalità che hanno portato all’istituzione della Zona naturale di salvaguardia, così come indicate all’ art. 52ter della Legge Regionale n. 19/2009, Testo unico sulla tutela delle aree naturali e della biodiversità: a) tutelare gli ecosistemi agro-forestali esistenti; b) promuovere iniziative di recupero naturalistico
    [Show full text]
  • 1.4 Analisi Idrometrica
    Eventi alluvionali in Piemonte ANALISI METEOROLOGICA ED IDROLOGICA 1.4 ANALISI IDROMETRICA Secondo Barbero, Mariella Graziadei (**), Davide Rabuffetti (**), (**) Collaboratore esterno CSI Piemonte 1.4.1 INTRODUZIONE L’intensità, la persistenza e l’ampia distribuzione spaziale delle precipitazioni hanno generato significative onde di piena sui prin- cipali corsi d’acqua del reticolo idrografico piemontese, che hanno raggiunto carattere di eccezionalità in tutto il settore settentriona- le del bacino del Po, interessando tutti gli affluenti di sinistra sino al Ticino. Vengono evidenziati di seguito i dati di maggior interesse acquisiti dalla strumentazione idrometrica della regione Piemonte, integrata con la rete nazionale del Servizio Idrografico e Mareografico, disponibile in tempo reale ai sensi del protocollo d’intesa tra Regione Piemonte e Dipartimento dei Servizi Tecnici Nazionali del 24/4/1996. Figura 1.39 Rete idrografica con l’ubicazione delle stazioni idrometriche Nel successivo capitolo l’eccezionalità dell’evento sarà evidenzia- ta dal confronto con gli eventi storici. Nella Figura 1.39 è rappre- sentato lo sviluppo della rete idrografica piemontese, con l’ubica- zione delle stazioni di misura disponibili in tempo reale durante l’evento. 45 Eventi alluvionali in Piemonte ANALISI METEOROLOGICA ED IDROLOGICA 1.4.2 L’EVENTO DI PIENA LUNGO LA RETE IDROGRAFICA PRINCIPALE L’evento alluvionale appare eccezionale sull’intera asta del Po. A Carignano, grazie ai contributi della parte montana del Po, del Pellice e del Chisone, la portata ha superato i 2000 m3/s. Da segnalare la rarità dell’evento sul Chisone dove il tempo di ritorno del picco ha superato il secolo. Ulteriore notevole contributo alla formazione della piena del Po a monte di Torino è stato quello del Sangone per cui tut- tavia non si dispone di dati misurati.
    [Show full text]
  • Sport, Recreation and Green Space in the European City
    Sport, Recreation and Green Space in the European City Edited by Peter Clark, Marjaana Niemi and Jari Niemelä Studia Fennica Historica The Finnish Literature Society (SKS) was founded in 1831 and has, from the very beginning, engaged in publishing operations. It nowadays publishes literature in the fields of ethnology and folkloristics, linguistics, literary research and cultural history. The first volume of the Studia Fennica series appeared in 1933. Since 1992, the series has been divided into three thematic subseries: Ethnologica, Folkloristica and Linguistica. Two additional subseries were formed in 2002, Historica and Litteraria. The subseries Anthropologica was formed in 2007. In addition to its publishing activities, the Finnish Literature Society maintains research activities and infrastructures, an archive containing folklore and literary collections, a research library and promotes Finnish literature abroad. Studia fennica editorial board Markku Haakana Timo Kaartinen Pauli Kettunen Leena Kirstinä Teppo Korhonen Hanna Snellman Kati Lampela Editorial Office SKS P.O. Box 259 FI-00171 Helsinki www.finlit.fi Sport, Recreation and Green Space in the European City Edited by Peter Clark, Marjaana Niemi & Jari Niemelä Finnish Literature Society · Helsinki Studia Fennica Historica 16 The publication has undergone a peer review. The open access publication of this volume has received part funding via a Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation grant. © 2009 Peter Clark, Marjaana Niemi, Jari Niemelä and SKS License CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International A digital edition of a printed book first published in 2009 by the Finnish Literature Society. Cover Design: Timo Numminen EPUB Conversion: Tero Salmén ISBN 978-952-222-162-9 (Print) ISBN 978-952-222-791-1 (PDF) ISBN 978-952-222-790-4 (EPUB) ISSN 0085-6835 (Studia Fennica) ISSN 1458-526X (Studia Fennica Historica) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21435/sfh.16 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • Comisión Europea
    C 427/4 ES Diar io Ofi cial de la Unión Europea 19.12.2019 OTROS ACTOS COMISIÓN EUROPEA Publicación de una comunicación de aprobación de una modificación normal del pliego de condiciones de una denominación del sector vitivinícola, tal como se menciona en el artículo 17, apartados 2 y 3, del Reglamento Delegado (UE) 2019/33 de la Comisión (2019/C 427/03) La presente comunicación se publica con arreglo al artículo 17, apartado 5, del Reglamento Delegado (UE) 2019/33 de la Comisión (1) COMUNICACIÓN DE LA APROBACIÓN DE UNA MODIFICACIÓN NORMAL «Valsusa» Número de referencia: PDO-IT-A1243-AM02 Fecha de comunicación: 24.9.2019 DESCRIPCIÓN Y MOTIVOS DE LA MODIFICACIÓN APROBADA 1. Inscripción de nuevas variedades principales de uvas de vinificación y combinación de variedades de uva Descripción y motivos a) se han incluido las variedades Becuet y Baratuciat entre las principales variedades de uvas de vinificación. Motivos: las variedades Becuet y Baratuciat, históricamente presentes en la zona de producción de Valsusa, se han recuperado para el cultivo tras un largo período de experimentación y han sido reconocidas idóneas para el cultivo en la región del Piamonte. Así pues, se ha querido valorizar su producción en el ámbito de la DOC Valsusa, ya que dichas producciones, aunque limitadas a superficies muy pequeñas, representan una cuota muy importante para un territorio de montaña. La modificación afecta a los artículos 1, 2 4, 5 y 6 del pliego de condiciones y a la sección 1.7 del documento único. b) la variedad Becuet se ha incluido en el ámbito de la combinación de variedades obligatoria del 60 % del tipo Valsusa Rosso, junto con las demás variedades de uva ya presentes (Avanà, Barbera, Dolcetto y Neretta cuneese).
    [Show full text]
  • SERIES Basement and Mesozoic Cover, Are Known by Different Local Names (E.G
    GEOSCIENCE CANADA Volume 43 2016 13 SERIES basement and Mesozoic cover, are known by different local names (e.g. Luserna Stone, Borgone and Vaie Stone, Perosa Stone, Bargiolina Quartzite, Foresto and Chianocco Marble). These stones were largely employed during the 17th and 18th centuries for some of the most famous and important monuments in Turin (capital of Piedmont region, northwestern Italy), as well as in the countryside, since Roman times. Some of the materials exploited in the Dora-Maira Unit were also exported to foreign countries: Borgone and Vaie Stone were used for the paving of the Louvre Museum, and Perosa Stone was employed for the construction of the monument of Independence in Lagos, Nigeria. Consequently, the Dora-Maira Unit can be designated as a Global Heritage Stone Province. RÉSUMÉ L’Unité Dora-Maira est une unité géologique affleurant dans la Heritage Stone 2. partie interne des Alpes Cottiennes; elle appartient au Domai- ne Penninique des Alpes occidentales (Italie du Nord-Ouest). The Dora-Maira Unit (Italian Cottian Alps): A Elle se compose d’une croûte continentale d’âge Paléozoïque Reservoir of Ornamental Stones Since supérieur et de sa couverture carbonatique Mésozoïque, méta- morphosées en faciès éclogite pendant le Cénozoïque. En rai- Roman Times* son de la complexité des associations lithologiques et des transformations métamorphiques et structurelles, l’Unité + Alessandro Borghi , Paola Cadoppi and Giovanna Dora-Maira a été une source de pierres ornementales au cours Antonella Dino des siècles, et encore il représente un réservoir de matériau employé localement pour des bâtiments contemporains et his- Department of Earth Sciences, University of Turin toriques.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannibal's Trek Across the Alps: Geomorphological Analysis of Sites
    39 Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 39-54 Copyright © 2008 MAA Printed in Greece. All rights reserved. HANNIBAL’S TREK ACROSS THE ALPS: GEOMORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF SITES OF GEOARCHAEOLOGICAL INTEREST William C. Mahaney1*, Volli Kalm2, Randy W. Dirszowsky3, Michael W. Milner1, Rana Sodhi4, Roelf Beukens5, Ron Dorn6, Pierre Tricart7, Stéphane Schwartz8, Eva Chamorro-Perez9, Sal Boccia10, René W. Barendregt11, D.H. Krinsley12, E. R. Seaquist13, David Merrick14 and Barbara Kapran1 1Quaternary Surveys, 26 Thornhill Ave., Thornhill, Ontario, Canada, L4J 1J4, 2Institute of Geology, Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia, 51014, 3Departments of Geography and Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, P3E 2C6, 4Surface Interface Ontario and Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3E5, 5IsoTrace Lab, Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A7, 6Department of Geography, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287-0104, 7Laboratoire de Géodynamique des Chaînes alpines, University of Grenoble, Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers, 38041 Grenoble, France, 8Laboratoire de Géophysique interne et de Tectonophysique, Observatoire des Sciences de l’Univers, 38041 Grenoble, France, 9Laboratoire des Sciences de la Terre, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 69364 Lyon, France, 10University of Toronto, Department of Materials Science, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 3E4, 11Department of Geography, Lethbridge University, Lethbridge, Alberta,
    [Show full text]
  • The Turin Fluvial Terraces As Evidence of the New Holocene Setting of the Po River
    Journal of Maps ISSN: (Print) 1744-5647 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjom20 The Turin fluvial terraces as evidence of the new Holocene setting of the Po River M. Gabriella Forno & Franco Gianotti To cite this article: M. Gabriella Forno & Franco Gianotti (2020): The Turin fluvial terraces as evidence of the new Holocene setting of the Po River, Journal of Maps, DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2020.1768447 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2020.1768447 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of Journal of Maps View supplementary material Published online: 01 Jun 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 16 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjom20 JOURNAL OF MAPS https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2020.1768447 The Turin fluvial terraces as evidence of the new Holocene setting of the Po River M. Gabriella Forno and Franco Gianotti Department of Earth Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY A detailed geomorphological mapping of the Po River fluvial terraces into Turin was performed Received 16 October 2019 through a field survey. Although Turin is crossed by the Po River, most of the town is built on the Revised 27 April 2020 extended alpine outwash fans linked to its tributaries (essentially fed by the Dora Riparia Basin), Accepted 6 May 2020 – made by 20 60 m thick gravel with sand lenses, or on erosional terraces (T1 and T2) shaped by KEYWORDS the Po River into these sediments.
    [Show full text]
  • Cesana Torinese Stands (1,354 M
    . .1958 0 5 1 2 )( Santa 1911 2275 . Colletto 1488 Amazas Maddalena 2781 . Pourachet 1182 2604 1814 0 0 2135 0 Punta Clotesse 2 2 2 . 0 0 . 1231 2559 . (Pointe Cloutzau) Soubras 1776 2338 ! C. Pourachet 0 S. Barnaba 1152 Rio 5 2879 2132 7 1482 . 1 Bosco 2076 . 2 3 . Barracan 0 . 0 1344 Caserma IX 1778 Invers 0 5 6 1 2093 Croce 2 0 0 . 1 0 . 0 5 5 di Ricovero X di San Giuseppe 5 1404 1353 Lozet 4 2753 R. 1 Malafosse . 1 . 2 4 0 20 0 2394 . Goussieras 2368 . Cote Presu . 1928 Malafosse D 2817 Riparia Rio . Bassa é s e r . v Bramafam 1344 2092 t e s 2805 2695 . 2280 Autagnas Nero . 4 2609 2 Sportinia Capannina 5 . 0 . Dora 1462 0 0 2 2159 1683 Clot . Kind 2 Juana 2140 5 2 1678 0 0 . 1221 . 2205 . Selle . Fiume 1811 2198 2559 la 1954 Malafosse . de Alta 1875 Capanna Ricovero Plan . 1510 2509 20 . Mollino Rocchette 1468 1 . 0 Passo di 3 2274 0 . v . 2193 0 5 Ricovero 2261 5 Desertes . 2266 2 )( S. Anna 2553 VIII 2338 1813 1428 . 1 4 1974 Gr. Millaure 0 . 0 1717 2261 0 0 5 1 0 0 6 2 1751 2 R. 3 1222 0 2027 20 . 0 Gr. Charette Audieras Grangia 1814 Pisse 2294 1423 Fransej 0 0 7 2 Ric. Plan la Selle 20 . 6 Bunker 1532 Gr. Sarret 1 1645 1825 2303 v 0 2123 0 Prato 1576 . Prato 2326 . 0 . 0 8 . v . Serra 2 Rocca .
    [Show full text]