DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-AZ-A010-2017-0041-EA August 2017 Black Rock Communications Tower and Power Line Location: Mohave County, AZ Applicant/Address: Tower Consulting Inc. 5905 W. Post Road Suite 100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Dixie Power 145 Brigham Road St. George, UT 84790 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Arizona Strip Field Office 345 East Riverside Drive St. George, UT 84790 Phone: 435-688-3200 FAX: 435-688-3258 Table of Contents 1.0. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 5 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.2. Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................ 8 1.3. Conformance with Land Use Plan .................................................................................. 8 1.4. Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, and Other Plans ............................................. 11 1.5. Identification of Issues ..................................................................................................... 12 2.0. Proposed Action and Alternatives .................................................................................... 13 2.1. Alternative A - Proposed Action .................................................................................... 13 2.1.1. Communications Facility Compound .................................................................... 13 2.1.2. Power Line .................................................................................................................. 17 2.1.3. Access ........................................................................................................................ 19 2.1.4. Operations and Maintenance ................................................................................ 19 2.1.5. Best Management Practices ................................................................................... 19 2.1.6. Environmental Protection Measures/Design Features ......................................... 21 2.1.7. Monitoring .................................................................................................................. 24 2.2. Alternative B – Shorter Tower .......................................................................................... 24 2.3. Alternative C – Buried Power Line ................................................................................. 24 2.4. Alternative D – Northern Overhead Power Line .......................................................... 25 2.5. Alternative E - No Action ................................................................................................ 26 2.6. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ............................... 26 2.6.1. Lower Elevation Tower .............................................................................................. 26 2.6.2. West Tower ................................................................................................................. 26 2.6.3. Low Mountain Tower ................................................................................................ 26 3.0. Affected Environment ........................................................................................................ 28 3.1. Elements/Resources of the Human Environment ........................................................ 29 3.2. Resources Brought Forward for Analysis ....................................................................... 33 3.2.1. Wildlife, Including Migratory Birds and Sensitive Species .................................... 33 3.2.2. Visual Resources ........................................................................................................ 35 3.2.3. Socioeconomics ........................................................................................................ 39 4.0. Environmental Consequences .......................................................................................... 40 BLM ASDO NEPA No. DOI-BLM-AZ-A010-2017-0041-EA i 4.1. Wildlife, Including Migratory Birds and Sensitive Species ........................................... 41 4.1.1. Alternative A - Proposed Action ............................................................................. 41 4.1.2. Alternative B – Shorter Tower ................................................................................... 42 4.1.3. Alternative C – Buried Power Line ........................................................................... 43 4.1.4. Alternative D – Northern Overhead Power Line ................................................... 44 4.1.5. Alternative E – No Action ......................................................................................... 44 4.2. Visual Resources ............................................................................................................... 44 4.2.1. Alternative A - Proposed Action ............................................................................. 44 4.2.2. Alternative B – Shorter Tower ................................................................................... 49 4.2.3. Alternative C – Buried Power Line ........................................................................... 52 4.2.4. Alternative D – Northern Overhead Power Line ................................................... 52 4.2.5. Alternative E – No Action ......................................................................................... 53 4.3. Socioeconomics .............................................................................................................. 53 4.3.1. Alternative A – Proposed Action ............................................................................. 53 4.3.2. Alternative B – Shorter Tower ................................................................................... 54 4.3.3. Alternative C – Buried Power Line ........................................................................... 54 4.3.4. Alternative D – Northern Overhead Power Line ................................................... 54 4.3.5. Alternative E – No Action ......................................................................................... 54 4.4. Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................................................ 54 4.4.1. Wildlife, Including Migratory Birds and Sensitive Species .................................... 58 4.4.2. Visual Resources ........................................................................................................ 58 4.4.3. Socioeconomics ........................................................................................................ 59 5.0. Consultation and Coordination ........................................................................................ 60 5.1. Summary of Public Participation ................................................................................... 60 5.2. List of Preparers and Contributors.................................................................................. 68 6.0. Literature Cited .................................................................................................................... 69 Appendices Appendix A – Exhibits Appendix B – Site Plan and Site Detail Appendix C – Visual Resource Worksheets and KOP Photo Simulations BLM ASDO NEPA No. DOI-BLM-AZ-A010-2017-0041-EA ii List of Tables Table 1. Proposed Action Disturbance ............................................................................. 14 Table 2. Summary of Disturbance by Alternative ............................................................ 25 Table 3. Summary Evaluation of Elements/Resources of the Human Environment .... 29 Table 4. Visual Resource Management Class Objectives .............................................. 35 Table 5. Key Observation Points Descriptions ................................................................... 36 Table 6. Terms Used to Describe the Environmental Effects ........................................... 40 Table 7. Land Status in the CIA ........................................................................................... 55 Table 8. Grazing Allotments within the CIA ...................................................................... 55 Table 9. VRM Classes in the CIA ......................................................................................... 59 Table 10. Public Scoping Comments and Responses ....................................................... 61 Table 11. Public Comments on the EA ................................................................................ 66 Table 12. BLM Staff ................................................................................................................. 68 Table 13. Non-BLM Preparers (Stantec Consulting Services Inc.) .................................... 68 List of Figures Figure 1. General Project Location and Land Status ......................................................... 6 Figure 2. Communications Facility and Power Line .......................................................... 15 Figure 3. VRM Classes, KOPs, and Seen/Unseen Analysis ................................................ 37 Figure 4. Cumulative Impacts Analysis Area ....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vol. 7 National Family Farm Discovery Dox
    Case: 19-70115, 08/13/2019, ID: 11396549, DktEntry: 36-7, Page 1 of 233 No. 19-70115 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL FAMILY FARM COALITION, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents, and MONSANTO COMPANY, Intervenor-Respondent. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY PETITIONERS’ EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME VII of IX ______________________ CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL George A. Kimbrell DIVERSITY Sylvia Shih-Yau Wu Stephanie M. Parent Amy van Saun PO Box 11374 2009 NE Alberta St., Suite 207 Portland, OR 97211 Portland, OR 97211 T: (971) 717-6404 T: (971) 271-7372 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Petitioners Case: 19-70115, 08/13/2019, ID: 11396549, DktEntry: 36-7, Page 2 of 233 INDEX TO PETITIONERS’ EXCERPTS OF RECORD VOLUME I Admin. R. ER Date 1 Document Description Doc. No. Page No. 2 11/1/2018 M.8 Registration Decision for the ER 0001 Continuation of Uses of Dicamba on Dicamba Tolerant Cotton and Soybean 11/1/2018 M.9 Approval Master Label for EPA ER 0025 Registration No. 524-617, Primary Brand Name: M1768 Herbicide Alternate Brand Name: XtendiMax® With VaporGrip® Technology 11/5/2018 M.4 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 0065 and Approved Master Label for EPA Registration No. 524-617, Primary Brand Name: M1768 Herbicide Alternate Brand Name: XtendiMax® With VaporGrip® Technology 11/5/2018 M.3 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 00121 EPA Reg Number 352-913 DuPont FeXapan Herbicide Decision 545658 and Approved Label 11/1/2018 M.5 Notice of Conditional Registration ER 0167 EPA Registration Number 7969- 345 Engenia Herbicide Decision No.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 52 MARCH 2011 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, CANDIDATE & PROPOSED PLANT SPECIES OF UTAH Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Casey Burns, State Biologist, NRCS, Salt Lake City, Utah Last Chance Townsendia (Townsendia aprica). Photo by Megan Robinson. This technical note identifies the current threatened, endangered, candidate and proposed plant species listed by the U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI FWS) in Utah. Review your county list of threatened and endangered species and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Conservation Data Center (CDC) GIS T&E database to see if any of these species have been identified in your area of work. Additional information on these listed species can be found on the USDI FWS web site under “endangered species”. Consideration of these species during the planning process and determination of potential impacts related to scheduled work will help in the conservation of these rare plants. Contact your Plant Material Specialist, Plant Materials Center, State Biologist and Area Biologist for additional guidance on identification of these plants and NRCS responsibilities related to the Endangered Species Act. 2 Table of Contents Map of Utah Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant Species 4 Threatened & Endangered Species Profiles Arctomecon humilis Dwarf Bear-poppy ARHU3 6 Asclepias welshii Welsh’s Milkweed ASWE3 8 Astragalus ampullarioides Shivwits Milkvetch ASAM14 10 Astragalus desereticus Deseret Milkvetch ASDE2 12 Astragalus holmgreniorum Holmgren Milkvetch ASHO5 14 Astragalus limnocharis var.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Rare Plant Advisory Group Sensitive Plant List -June 2014
    ARIZONA RARE PLANT ADVISORY GROUP SENSITIVE PLANT LIST -JUNE 2014 •.. -e 'I"': ~ ~ •.. ·s o 0 .g o rn u rn '•".. ..>: ::s ~ ~ ~ 0"' tU I': ~ ~ Z ..•.. ~ '" u ::... 0 ~ E 0 u -; •.. is '5 rn 0 0 ~ ;::l ~ "g u d iL< ..>: ~ 0 •.. ~ s •.... "B .. § 0 ; 0 ~ ~ U ~ il< < ~ E-< ~ VERY HIGH CONCERN Agave delamateri Hodgs. & Slauson Asparagaceae w.e L Tonto Basin Agave 7 7 7 c Asparagaceae Agave phillipsiana w.e Hodgs wand Canvon Centurv Plant 7 7 7 nc Aotragalus crt!mnophylax uar: crt!mnophylax Bameby Fabaceae Sentrv Milk-vetch 7 8 7.5 c AOfragalus holmgreniomm Bameby Fabaceae Holmgren (Paradox) Milk-vetch 7 7 7 c Orobanchaceae Castilleja mogollonica PeJ2lJell Mogollon Paintbrush 7 8 7.5 Lv c Apiaceae Eryngium sparganophyllum HemsL Ribbonleaf Button Snakeroot 6 8 7 v? nc Lotus meamsii var. equisolensis].L Anderson Fabaccae Horseshoe Deer Vetch 6 8 7 nc Cactaceae Pediacactus brat!Ji L Benson Brady Pincushion Cactus 7 7 7 c Boraginaceae Phacelia cronquistiana S.L Wel,.h Cronquist's Phacelia 7 8 7.5 nc PotClltil1a arizona Greene Rosaceae Arizone Cinquefoil 6 8 7 nc Sphaeralcea gierischii N.D. Atwood & S.L Welsh Malvaceae Gierisch globemallow 7 7 7 nc HIGH CONCERN Ranunculaceae Actaea arizonica (S. Watson) J. Compton Arizona Buzbane 6 6 6 c Agave murpheyi F. Gibson Asparagaeeae Hohokam Agave 6 6 6 c Asnaragaceae Agave yavapaiensis Yavapai Agave 6 7 6.5 ne Aletes macdougalli ssp. macdougaftiJM. Coulto & Rose Apiaceae MacDougal's Indian parsley 6 6 6 nc Alide/la cliffordii J.M. Potter Polernoniaceae Clifford's Gilia 5 7 6 nc Antic/ea vaginata Rydb.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 156/Tuesday, August 13, 2013
    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 13, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 49149 § 1.7002 Frequency of reports. within a calendar year shall file data for place that would preclude disclosure of Entities subject to the provisions of the reporting period in which they any confidential information, and § 1.7001 shall file reports semi-annually. become eligible and semi-annually (ii) ‘‘Eligible entities,’’ as those Reports shall be filed each year on or thereafter. entities are defined in the Broadband before March 1st (reporting data ■ 9. Amend § 43.11 to revise paragraphs Data Improvement Act, in an aggregated required on FCC Form 477 as of (a), (b), and (c) to read as follows: format and pursuant to confidentiality December 31 of the prior year) and conditions prescribed by the September 1st (reporting data required § 43.11 Reports of local exchange Commission, and on FCC Form 477 as of June 30 of the competition data. (iii) Others, to the extent that access current year). Entities becoming subject (a) All common carriers and their to such data can be accomplished in a to the provisions of § 1.7001 for the first affiliates (as defined in 47 U.S.C. 153(1)) manner that addresses concerns about time within a calendar year shall file providing telephone exchange or the competitive sensitivity of the data data for the reporting period in which exchange access service (as defined in and precludes public disclosure of any they become eligible and semi-annually 47 U.S.C. 153(16) and (47)), commercial confidential information. thereafter. mobile radio service (CMRS) providers * * * * * offering mobile telephony (as defined in [FR Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Version
    Winter 2017 Volume 40 Number 1 Bears Ears Grasses ...................2 2016 Mulch Pile ..................... 18 UNPS Grant-in-Aid Prog. ........4 American Penstemon Society Sand Cholla .................................5 Rare Opportunity .................. 22 Ann Kelsey Student Fund ......8 Rare Plant Meeting ............... 23 Species Distributions ..............9 Opuntioid ID ........................... 24 Farming For Wildflowers ... 14 UNPS Wildflower Poster .... 25 Celebrate! BEARS EARS NATIONAL MONUMENT NATIONAL EARS BEARS Ways of the Meadow ............ 16 UNPS Officers, Chairs ........... 26 Utah Native Plant Society 2 Native and Exotic Grasses in a Livestock-Free Allotment in Bears Ears National Monument by Mary O’Brien, Grand Canyon Trust, UNPS Canyonlands/Moab Chapter There’s a cattle allotment in the new Bears Ears National Monument in southeastern Utah that is pretty special right now. Listed as the Gooseberry allotment by the Manti-La Sal National Forest (MLSNF), it has had a different name since 2012: White Mesa Cultural and Conservation Area (WMCCA), with reference to the nearby Ute Mountain Ute Tribe town of White Mesa. It also has a different man- agement situation: No cattle grazing, at least until 2021. Under a Memo of Under- Meadow diversity at work: Hesperostipa co- standing between the Ute Mountain Ute mata and Koeleria macrantha...and one Tribe, Grand Canyon Trust, and the Forest sedge. Photo by Mary O'Brien. Service, this is the one area in the entire 1.2-million acre MLSNF that is being permitted to be free of livestock grazing. The cattle-free status of WMCCA was one of three reasons Sue Smith, a retired comput- er scientist and high school science teacher living in Prescott, Arizona, decided to study its native grasses for a Utah State University masters degree in Natural Resource Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status Vegetation Species and Noxious Weeds
    5.3.10 Special Status Vegetation Species and Noxious Weeds 5.3.10.1 Affected Environment Special Status Vegetation Species Overview. This section presents information on the 58 special status plant species that potentially occur in the survey area, based on habitat requirements. The list of species was derived from an overall list of 101 species, including plants listed by the USFWS list as threatened, endangered, proposed, candidate, and conservation agreement species potentially occurring in Mohave and Coconino counties, Arizona, and Washington and Kane counties, Utah; Glen Canyon GCNRA Special Status Plant Species list; and the BLM Sensitive Plant Species List for the Arizona Strip, and for Kane and Washington counties, Utah (Table 5-88). Table 5-88 Special Status Plant Species with Potential to Occur within the Area of Potential Effect Page 1 of 4 Found in Area of Species Name and Family Status1 Potential Effect (Yes/No) Acer glabrum (Rocky Mountain maple) GCNRA G5 No Aceraceae Acer grandidentatum (Bigtooth maple) GCNRA G5 No Aceraceae `Aralia racemosa (American spikenard) GCNRA G5 No Araliaceae Arctomecon humilis (Dwarf bear-poppy) ESA LE No Papaveraceae Asclepias welshii (Welsh’s milkweed) ESA LT, CH No Asclepidaceae Astragalus ampullarioides (Shivwits milkvetch) ESA LE, CH No Fabaceae Astragalus ampullarius (Gumbo milkvetch) BLM UT No Fabaceae Astragalus holmgreniorum (Paradox [Holmgren] milkvetch) ESA LE, CH No Fabaceae Astragalus striatiflorus (Escarpment milkvetch) BLM UT No Fabaceae Camissonia bairdii (Baird camissonia) BLM
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Status for the Gierisch Mallow and Designation of Critical Habitat; Proposed Rule
    Vol. 77 Friday, No. 160 August 17, 2012 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Status for the Gierisch Mallow and Designation of Critical Habitat; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:01 Aug 16, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\17AUP3.SGM 17AUP3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3 49894 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 160 / Friday, August 17, 2012 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR We request that you send comments to designate critical habitat for the only by the methods described above. species. In total, approximately 5,189 Fish and Wildlife Service We will post all comments on http:// hectares (ha) (12,822 acres (ac)) are www.regulations.gov. This generally proposed for designation as critical 50 CFR Part 17 means that we will post any personal habitat in both Arizona and Utah. [Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2012–0049; information you provide us (see the The Endangered Species Act provides 4500030113] Public Comments section below for the basis for our action. Under the more information). Endangered Species Act, we can RIN 1018–AY58 The coordinates, or plot points, or determine that a species is endangered both from which the critical habitat or threatened based on any of five Endangered and Threatened Wildlife maps are generated are included in the and Plants; Determination of Status for factors: (A) The present or threatened administrative record for this destruction, modification, or the Gierisch Mallow and Designation of rulemaking and are available at (http:// Critical Habitat curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/), overutilization for commercial, http://www.regulations.gov at Docket AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, recreational, scientific, or educational Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonaquint Property – Vegetation Community Management Considerations Outline I
    Tonaquint Property – Vegetation Community Management Considerations Outline I. Unique Ecological Setting of Project Area II. Designated Vegetation Communities A. Why Vegetation Communities B. Location/Extent C. Condition III. Listed and Sensitive Species Presence IV. Invasive Species V. Recreation VI. Putting it All Together for Management What Makes Tonaquint Special for so Many? • Transition zone (“Ecotone”) between Colorado plateau, Mojave Desert and Great Basin (region has characteristics of all three, thus high diversity) • T&E species • Geology (different growth substrates) • Diversity in recreation possibilities Diversity Specifics State listed Sensitive Species Federally listed Species in Washington County Plants Plants Parry’s Sandpaper Plant (Petalonyx Dwarf Bearclaw-poppy (Arctomecon humilis) Endangered parryi) Gierisch's globemallow (Sphaeralcea gierischii) Endangered Paradox Milkvetch (Astragalus holmgreniorum) Endangered Animals Shivwits Milkvetch (Astragalus ampullarioides) Endangered Gila Monster Siler Pincushion Cactus (Pediocactus sileri) Threatened … 36 total sensitive animal species Animals for Washington County Mojave Desert Tortoise - Threatened Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Mexican Spotted Owl Vascular Plants - 799 Plants within 25km (Seinet) Utah Prairie Dog - 1398 plants in Washington County (Utah Virgin Chub Flora) Woundfin - 8 Vegetation Communities Western Yellow-billed Red = Found in Tonaquint Property Blue = Found within 5 miles of Tonaquint Why Vegetation Communities? Vegetation communities - groups of
    [Show full text]
  • Species Risk Assessment
    Ecological Sustainability Analysis of the Kaibab National Forest: Species Diversity Report Ver. 1.2 Prepared by: Mikele Painter and Valerie Stein Foster Kaibab National Forest For: Kaibab National Forest Plan Revision Analysis 22 December 2008 SpeciesDiversity-Report-ver-1.2.doc 22 December 2008 Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 PART I: Species Diversity.............................................................................................................. 1 Species List ................................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria .................................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Sources................................................................................................................ 3 Screening Results.................................................................................................................... 4 Habitat Associations and Initial Species Groups........................................................................ 8 Species associated with ecosystem diversity characteristics of terrestrial vegetation or aquatic systems ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Type Specimens
    University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) 1201 Record(s) Page 1 of 322 COLO Type Specimens Acanthaceae Family: Acanthaceae Beloperone fragilis Robinson Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422655 Bar Code: 351023 Proofed: none. Location: San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Las Canoas. Habitat: Limestone ledges. Collector: C.G. Pringle #3933. Date: 30 October, 5 December 1891. Miscellaneous: Plantae Mexicanae. Gift from Colorado College 1984. Repr. Status: Flr. Annotations: = Beloperone tenera (Rob.) Turrill. References: Proc. Amer. Acad. 27:183. 1892. Beloperone pringlei S. Watson Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422657 Bar Code: 351031 Proofed: none. Location: Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Hills near Monterey. Habitat: none. Collector: C.G. Pringle #2548. Date: 15 July & 1 August 1889. Miscellaneous: Plantae Mexicanae. Gift from Colorado College 1984. Repr. Status: Flr. Annotations: = Justicia straminea D. Gibson. References: Proc. Amer. Acad. 25:160. 1890. Carlowrightia glandulosa Rob. & Greenm. Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422658 Bar Code: 356568 Proofed: none. Location: Oaxaca, Mexico. Monte Alban near Oaxaca. Habitat: none. 5500 ft. Collector: C.G. Pringle #6276. Date: 5 December 1895. Miscellaneous: 1-3 feet. Plantae Mexicanae. Gift from Colorado College 1984. Repr. Status: Flr & Frt. Annotations: none. References: Proc. Amer. Acad. 32:40. 1896. Carlowrightia ovata Gray Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422659 Bar Code: 356576 Proofed: none. Location: Chihuahua, Mexico. Ledges near Chihuahua. Habitat: none. Collector: C.G. Pringle #932. Date: 30 August 1885. Miscellaneous: Plantae Mexicanae. Gift from Colorado College 1984. Repr. Status: Flr & Frt. Annotations: none. References: Proc. Amer. Acad. 21:406. 1886. Page 2 of 322 COLO Type Specimens Acanthaceae Carlowrightia pringlei Rob. & Greenm. Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422660 Bar Code: 356584 Proofed: none.
    [Show full text]