DOCSLIB.ORG

Development Committee Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development Committee Statement DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE (Joint Ministerial Committee of the Boards of Governors of the Bank and the Fund on the Transfer of Real Resources to Developing Countries) SIXTY-SIXTH MEETING WASHINGTON D.C. – SEPTEMBER 28, 2002 DC/S/2002-0060 September 28, 2002 Statement by H.E. Agnes van Ardenne-van der Hoeven Minister for Development Co-operation The Netherlands Implementing The Monterrey Consensus My constituency countries returned from the World Summit for Sustainable Development (WSSD) with the impression that the international community has an impressive track record in reaching agreements. Johannesburg contributed to the adoption of a number of targets, to a clear recognition of the integrated nature of the three pillars of sustainable development (environment, economic and social development) and to widening the scope on international problem resolution by bringing the private sector and NGOs on board. It will be a challenge to integrate the WSSD targets in the MDG framework. The three pillars of sustainable development clearly translate into a continuing need for coherent policies. Involvement of the private sector and NGOs should result in partnerships, thus combining efforts of stakeholders in order to tackle specific problems. In Johannesburg we shared the feeling that the international focus in the coming years should be on implementation. The Netherlands Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende said in his speech “we have done the talking, let’s now do the walking”. Now is the time for action and implementation; I am pleased that this is firmly on the agenda of this DC meeting. The WSSD could have been clearer on the need for an integrated follow up to summits of this type; in particular where the relationship between WSSD and Monterrey is concerned. We welcome the proposal of the SG UN to monitor the implementation, also at the national level. The follow up to the Monterrey consensus covers many fields, and it should also encompass matters such as trade for development, including phasing out subsidies and market access, as well as Official Development Assistance (ODA). With three case studies and a proposal to strengthen our focus on results, this DC meeting centres on practical matters. I welcome the three cases, which illustrate the urgent need to push forward with implementation, and I fully support the lessons and conclusions the World Bank draws from them. I believe they show us the right way to speed up progress towards achieving the MDGs. As the World Bank points out in its DC paper, the way in which we deliver aid in practice is an important factor in achieving better results. However, it is not only a matter of shifting to performance-based aid allocations. Though this is a key measure which, as the Bank rightly points out, is crucial for increasing aid effectiveness, I believe that issues like partnership, coordination and respect for the country-driven nature of policies and systems are equally essential for successful implementation. Many countries, including within my constituency, have devised national development plans, and target Education for All, water & sanitation and HIV/AIDS. They need support, in terms of capacity building and financial resources, to implement them. At the same time, however, they have to juggle with donor projects and international initiatives and demands. Strategic alignment, harmonisation and coordination among donors are therefore major challenges. In terms of implementation, this means that donors should stop imposing their well-intentioned programmes and policies on developing countries. They should stop supporting activities that are not part of national strategies and start aligning aid to national priorities and systems. Decisions on funding should be made in consultation with recipient governments and other donors, so that a division of labour can be achieved among donor agencies. Donors must take account of developing countries' frequently limited institutional capacity and reduce the transaction costs of aid. We have talked at length about the need for harmonising donors procedures, and this is another area where effective implementation, with a focus on results, is now a must. These are the principles that will underpin my work as Dutch Minister for Development Cooperation. I intend to 2 participate in joint missions and joint administrative arrangements wherever possible. Like developing countries, donors should be monitored for their performance and taken to task in forums like the DC or the DAC when they do not deliver. I want to be held accountable for such efficiency, and I invite other donors to do the same. I believe that this is in the spirit of Monterrey, where we all agreed on mutual responsibilities and obligations. My constituency countries welcome the World Bank's suggestion to assess the performance of individual agencies for their inputs into the development process. To this end, I suggest that the DAC Task Force on Donor Practice should draw up broader assessment criteria than the usual indicators. The newly established monitoring system for IDA includes process indicators, for instance the number of country analyses carried out. It is a useful system, but I would propose going a step further and including partnership and donor behaviour indicators. Uganda could serve as a model here. Its PRSP specifies a number of criteria for good donor and government behaviour, i.e. “Jointly set output/outcome indicators”, “Develop uniform disbursement rules”, “End individual, parallel country programmes and stand-alone projects” and “Continue to increase the level of untied sector budget support and progressively reduce tying of procurement”. We need practical measures like these to guide implementation and to serve as yardsticks for assessing donor performance. I am committed to using these yardsticks and will continue untying Dutch aid and replacing stand-alone projects by supporting Sector Wide Approaches and PRSPs. Another step forward in the debate on monitoring results is the Bank’s proposal to focus on evaluating donor agencies' collective contributions. Indeed, it is not useful to try and evaluate the impact of individual donors. It is only desirable for internal accountability, to reassure courts of audit that our euros are being spent properly. I do not think it will be difficult to convince the Dutch court of audit to stop trying to keep track of the Dutch euro in splendid isolation, because I have realised that its effectiveness will be far greater if it is considered within the framework of national budget systems as a contribution towards joint activities. Abandoning explicit recognition of our own contribution is a fair price to pay for better results. I realise that this shift in approach may be too hard to swallow all at once. We will have to chew it over, in this DC meeting and in other relevant forums. We can however take the first steps in the right direction by harmonising the indicators from our respective monitoring systems and moving as far and as fast as we can towards the targets and indicators included in countries’ own PRSPs. What matters most is greater accountability to the people of the recipient countries. Seen in this light, it is paramount to use their monitoring systems to measure results and improve them where necessary. Progress in implementing Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) I welcome the progress made by the PRSP countries and want to express my appreciation for the active support given by the World Bank and the IMF. This progress report identifies the challenges arising from implementation of PRSPs. However, I would have liked a more explicit report on responses to the recommendations from the PRSP Review. I am pleased to read that the Multidonor PRSP Trust Fund has got off to a good start. The Netherlands helped to establish this fund with the aim of building capacity in PRSP countries and promoting cooperation between UN agencies and the World Bank in the PRSP process. I regret to note that many UN agencies still play no significant role in the PRPS process at country level, although they have a clear mandate to monitor poverty, promote good governance and build capacity in civil society organisations. I therefore urge the World Bank to seize every opportunity to build stronger partnerships with the 3 relevant UN agencies. The recent introduction of IDA grants gives me more reason than ever to keep close track of relations between the UN funds and programs and the World Bank. The IDA donors have requested intensified partnerships in the fields of HIV/AIDS and post conflict countries in particular. It is here that IDA will provide grants instead of credits and will move closer to the UN mandate. I suggest that the next PRSP progress report should highlight the relationship between the World Bank and the UN agencies. We now have nineteen full PRSPs. Their quality varies. In many cases, social policies are set out in more detail than economic policies. Much work remains to be done in fleshing out the relationship between economic policies and poverty outcomes. I am pleased with the proposal submitted by the World Bank and the IMF to assist countries in developing alternative macroeconomic policies and fallback scenarios. Support for thinking through various policy options can enhance country ownership, since fully informed choices increase commitment.. Fallback scenarios are relevant for countries with vulnerable economies which may be affected by external shocks. We would welcome the Bank and Fund to carry out further research to help us anticipate such shocks and maintain past achievements on the road to development. Although progress has been made on many fronts, some fundamental issues still need to be addressed. Are the policies of PRSP countries more pro poor than before? Are they more likely to result in less poverty? I call upon the World Bank and Fund to allocate sufficient budget and to expand their Poverty and Social Impact (PSIA) work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poverty and Climate Change Reducing the Vulnerability of the Poor Through Adaptation
    Poverty and Climate Change Reducing the Vulnerability of the Poor through Adaptation prepared by: African Development Bank Asian Development Bank Department for International Development, United Kingdom Directorate-General for Develop- ment, European Commission Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Development Cooperation, The Netherlands Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development United Nations Development Programme United Nations Environment Programme The World Bank II Contents List of Boxes, Figures, Tables, Acronyms and Abbreviations IV Foreword V Acknowledgements VI Executive Summary IX Poverty Reduction – the Challenge of the 21st Century IX Climate Change is Happening and Will Increasingly Affect the Poor IX Adaptation is Necessary X Strengthening Adaptation Efforts XI Next Steps XII Part 1: Climate Change and the Poor 1 1.1 Climate Change is a Reality 1 1.2 Developing Countries Will Be Particularly Affected 5 1.3 Adaptation is a Necessity 5 1.4 Existing Vulnerability to Climate Variability 5 1.5 Already Stressed Coping Capacities 6 1.6 Climate Change Compounding Existing Risks and Vulnerabilities 7 1.7 Implications for Poverty Eradication 11 Part 2: Adaptation Lessons from Past Experience 15 2.1 Addressing Vulnerability in the Context of Sustainable Livelihoods 15 2.2 Equitable Growth and Adaptation to Climate Change 19 2.3 Improving Governance to Mainstream Climate Issues in Poverty Reduction 24 Part 3: The Way Forward 29 3.1 Mainstream Adaptation into Sustainable
    [Show full text]
  • ASC Working Paper 122 / 2015
    Historical overview of development policies and institutions in the Netherlands, in the context of private sector development and (productive) employment creation Agnieszka Kazimierczuk ASC Working Paper 122 / 2015 Agnieszka Kazimierczuk African Studies Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] African Studies Centre P.O. Box 9555 2300 RB Leiden The Netherlands Telephone +31-71-5273372 Fax +31-71-5273344 E-mail [email protected] Website http://www.ascleiden.nl Agnieszka Kazimierczuk, 2015 2 Historical overview of development policies and institutions in the Netherlands, in the context of private sector development and (productive) employment creation Agnieszka Kazimierczuk Abstract This paper reviews the Dutch development cooperation policies for the years 1949-2015 with particular attention for private sector development (PSD). Over the years, poverty alleviation, private sector development and security have been dominant focus areas of Dutch development cooperation, with PSD taking a central role as it was assumed that poverty could only be alleviated when a country’s economy is stimulated. Therefore, the Dutch government has been strongly supporting policies and initiatives stimulating PSD in the Netherlands and in developing countries. The long history of Dutch development cooperation shows continuity in its approach towards development policy as a way of promoting Dutch businesses and export in developing countries. Introduction This paper reviews Dutch development cooperation policies for the years 1949-2015 with particular attention for private sector development (PSD). Moreover, this appraisal examines a potential role for Dutch development policies in creating an enabling environment for the ‘home’ (Dutch) and ‘host’ (recipient) private sector to generate (productive) employment. Since the end of the Second World War, the Netherlands has been an active supporter of international development aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech by Agnes Van Ardenne-Van Der Hoeven, Minister for Development Cooperation
    Speech by Agnes van Ardenne-Van der Hoeven, Minister for Development Cooperation. Cordaid, ICCO and ISS Conference “Religion: A Source for Human Rights and Development Cooperation” 7 September 2005, Soesterberg The outstretched hand (During the speech, a photograph is projected showing the outstretched hand of a white missionary, holding the hand of an emaciated Ugandan child) [Introduction] Ladies and gentlemen, The Old Testament says “You shall open wide your hand to your brother, to the needy and to the poor in the land”. In development cooperation, the world is the land. This photograph is called “Hands” and it goes to the core of what we do: human hands as a symbol of the poverty that divides the world. But these hands are also a symbol of the compassion that can unite us, that can make us reach out and lend a helping hand. In this case, compassion flows from a religious source. The helping hand is the hand of a missionary. When I was a child development cooperation had the face of a missionary. Every once in a while, missionaries would visit my parents’ house and tell us about the poor and needy far beyond our borders. They would tell us how we could reach out, so that they could live their lives in dignity, and what I, a child living in a small village in the Netherlands, could do for children like the one in this photograph. But the truth is that the helping hand in this photo could just as easily have been the hand of a Muslim.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaning up the Mess by John Roberts Matter
    HARSH “It depends on your reading habits. When I open a book, ASSESSMENT: I start reading at the footnotes.” Worldwatch Institute reports on the state of – Michel Camdessus, former managing director of the International Monetary Fund, reacting the world to complaints that his report backs big dams and relegates the concerns of the World – p. 7 Commission on Dams to a footnote. SATURDAY, MARCH 22, 2003 NEWSPAPER OF THE 3RD WORLD WATER FORUM ~ KYOTO, SHIGA & OSAKA, JAPAN VOLUME 1, ISSUE 7 Cleaning Up the Mess by John Roberts matter. The Bush administration says it will soon award big More than 20 years of conflict supervisory reconstruction con- in the Gulf demonstrate the tracts to US companies. Reports need for a new Geneva from Washington say the US Convention to protect the envi- does not envisage a major role ronment, says Klaus Toepfer, for the UN, or even American executive director of the United NGOs, in a post-Saddam Iraq. Nations Environment Program Most UN agencies withdrew (UNEP). from Iraq hours before the “We have learned again and United States launched its again that the environment can attack. be used as a weapon,” Mr. The Bush administration’s Toepfer says. “The conse- decision to sideline the UN in quences of this are extremely the reconstruction of a post- serious, and not only for the Saddam Iraq, following its ear- people living there.” lier move to ignore the Security Mr. Toepfer says he is par- Council in deciding to attack the ticularly concerned about water, country, raises questions about arable land and the loss of bio- the future of the United Nations diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Journal N° 5 for UNCTAD XI
    N° 5 PROGRAMME OF MEETINGS Tuesday, 15 June 2004 On Conference Site Interactive Thematic Sessions 10 a.m. - 1 p.m. Building Productive Capacity - The Key to Plenary Hall Benefiting from Globalization Session I: Leveraging Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) for Export Competitiveness The session will also feature a special intervention by H.E. Mr. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, President of Brazil Moderator: Ms. Hilary BOWKER, Bowker Media+Communications, former CNN Anchor Followed by: 3 p.m. - 6 p.m. Session II: Building Competitive Export Plenary Hall Capacity of Developing Country Firms (TD/399) Moderator: Ms. Lala de Heinzelin, Enthusiasmo Cultural, Brazil Followed by: Award Event by World Summit of Young Entrepreneurs TD(XI)/OD/5 SAO.04 - 017 Committee of the Whole 9.30 a.m. - Drafting Group 1 (Chapeau & para. 99) Room I 1.30 p.m. - Drafting Group 1 (Chapeau & para. 99) Room AJUBA (continues) at the Holiday Inn 9.30 a.m. - Drafting Group 2 (subthemes 1 to 4) Room AJUBA at the Holiday Inn 6.30 p.m. - Drafting Group 2 (subthemes 1 to 4) Room G (continues) * * * * * 5 p.m. - 6 p.m. Meeting of the Committee of the Whole Room I (TD/L.368 and Add.1) * * * * * General Debate 10 a.m. - 1 p.m. Statements by: Room B Norway, Botswana, Finland, Germany, Czech Republic, Mauritania, Bangladesh, China, Egypt, Iraq, Indonesia, Pakistan, Bhutan, Venezuela, Romania, Philippines, Russian Federation, Qatar 3 p.m. - 9 p.m. Statements by: Room B Japan, United States of America, Mozambique, United Republic of Tanzania, Republic of Korea, Sweden, Saudi Arabia, Serbia and Montenegro, Burkina Faso, South Africa, Iceland, Côte d'Ivoire, Kazakhstan, India, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Austria, UNDP, Portugal, UNIDO, Senegal, Costa Rica, Switzerland, FAO, Nepal, World Tourism Organization, Bulgaria, Australia, Canada, Yemen Other meetings on Conference Site 11.45 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Trade-Related Technical Assistance Isbn 90-5328-349-8 *) Niet Meer Beschikbaar IOB Evaluations Policy and Operations Evaluation Department
    IOB October 2005 No. 300 IOB Evaluations www.euforic.org/iob Evaluations no. 300 2005 Aid for Trade? Aid for Trade? evaluations An Evaluation of Trade-Related Ministry of Foreign Affairs Technical Assistance P.O. Box 20061 2500 eb The Hague The Netherlands www.minbuza.nl October 2005 ISBN 90 5328 349 8 Seattle 1999 Doha 2001 Cancun 2003 Policy and Operations Evaluation Department o s d r 0 5 4 1 / e Evaluatie-studies uitgebracht door de inspectie ontwikkelingssamenwerking en beleidsevaluatie (iob) 1995-2005 265 1995 Fertiliser Aid. Evaluation of Netherlands fertiliser aid 1975-1993 283 1999 Oret/Miliev review 1994-1999 Assisting developing countries to with special reference to Bangladesh, Mali and Zambia. buy investment goods and services in the Netherlands. 266 1996 Netherlands Aid Reviewed. An analysis of isbn 90-5328-248-3 Operations Review Unit Reports, 1983-1994 284 2000 Institutional Development Netherlands support to the 267 1997 Vrouwen in Burkina Faso en de Nederlandse Ontwikkelings water sector. samenwerking 1985-1995 isbn 90-5328-274-2 267 1997 Les Femmes du Burkina Faso et la Coopération 285 2000 Onderzoek naar de samenwerking tussen Mali en Néerlandaise 1985-1995 Nederland 1994-1998 268 1998 Vrouwen in Kenia en de Nederlandse Ontwikkelingssamen isbn 90-5328-278-5 werking 1985-1995 286 2001 Smallholder Dairy Support Programme (SDSP) Tanzania 268 1998 Women in Kenya and the Netherlands Development Inspection of its identification, formulation and tendering process Cooperation 1985-1995. isbn 90-5328-152-3 isbn 90-5328-298-x 269 1998 Bangladesh. Evaluation of the Netherlands Development 287 2001 De kunst van het Internationaal cultuurbeleid 1997-2000 Programme with Bangladesh, 1972-1996 isbn 90-5328-300-5 (Volume 1- Summary Report) 288 2002 Health, nutrition and population 269 1998 Bangladesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Address to Board Members by Netherlands Alternate Governor 0
    Address by Mrs Agnes VAN ARDENNE-VAN DER HOEVEN Netherlands Alternate Governor and Minister for Development Co-operation The Netherlands as delivered to Members of the Board of the African Development Bank Group Tunis, 7 February 2006 President Kaberuka, Distinguished Executive Directors, Vice Presidents, Members of the Board, Members of staff, Ladies and gentlemen, It is a great pleasure to address this informal meeting of the Board of Executive Directors of the African Development Bank, here at the Temporary Relocation Agency in Tunis, where we are enjoying such splendid surroundings and such warm hospitality. These are exciting and important times for us all: international development is high on the political agenda and so is Africa. A new spirit of mutual cooperation is emerging . As the British Prime Minister Tony Blair said at Gleneagles: "It isn't the end of poverty in Africa, but it is the hope that it can be ended." The growing international consensus on Africa and renewed energy in the Bank will reinvigorate the Bank’s mission to furthering development in Africa. I have full confidence that president Kaberuka will accept the enormous challenges and can lead this Bank in this process. The year 2005 was marked by renewed international commitment to achieve the MDGs. The United Nations Millennium Summit, the G8 Gleneagles Summit and the Commission for Africa were crucial in advancing the cause of development in Africa as they addressed such key issues as doubling aid inflows, improving aid 1 effectiveness, closing the infrastructure gap, providing debt relief, and opening markets. The European Union has played a particular constructive role as a catalyst for the increased aid commitments and consolidating its integrated approach in a new Africa strategy that was approved by the European Council at the end of 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Personalization of Political Newspaper Coverage: a Longitudinal Study in the Dutch Context Since 1950
    Personalization of political newspaper coverage: a longitudinal study in the Dutch context since 1950 Ellis Aizenberg, Wouter van Atteveldt, Chantal van Son, Franz-Xaver Geiger VU University, Amsterdam This study analyses whether personalization in Dutch political newspaper coverage has increased since 1950. In spite of the assumption that personalization increased over time in The Netherlands, earlier studies on this phenomenon in the Dutch context led to a scattered image. Through automatic and manual content analyses and regression analyses this study shows that personalization did increase in The Netherlands during the last century, the changes toward that increase however, occurred earlier on than expected at first. This study also shows that the focus of reporting on politics is increasingly put on the politician as an individual, the coverage in which these politicians are mentioned however became more substantive and politically relevant. Keywords: Personalization, content analysis, political news coverage, individualization, privatization Introduction When personalization occurs a focus is put on politicians and party leaders as individuals. The context of the news coverage in which they are mentioned becomes more private as their love lives, upbringing, hobbies and characteristics of personal nature seem increasingly thoroughly discussed. An article published in 1984 in the Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf forms a good example here, where a horse race betting event, which is attended by several ministers accompanied by their wives and girlfriends is carefully discussed1. Nowadays personalization is a much-discussed phenomenon in the field of political communication. It can simply be seen as: ‘a process in which the political weight of the individual actor in the political process increases 1 Ererondje (17 juli 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Faith in Society
    Faith in Society Christian Democratic reflections on the place of religion and world view in the public domain This document is a publication of the Research Institute for the CDA (WI) and the Centre for European Studies (CES) The aim of the Research Institute is to carry out research activities, or to commission such activities, on behalf of the CDA in accordance with the fundamental principles of the CDA and in line with the Programme of Principles. The Policy Institute provides documented advice on the key themes of CDA policy, either on its own initiative or at the request of the CDA and/or the members of the CDA in representative bodies. This publication has received the support of the European Parliament. The Policy Institute for the CDA, the CES and the European Parliament are not responsible for statistics and opinions contained in the publication or for any consequences arising from the use of the information contained in the publication. The report was compiled in 2012. Research Institute for the CDA P.O. Box 30453, 2500 GL The Hague Telephone (070) 3424874 Email [email protected] Internet www.cda.nl/wi Facebook www.facebook.com/wicda ISBN/EAN 978-90-74493-83-3 The Hague, December 2012, Research Institute for the CDA / Centre for European Studies All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a computerised data retrieval system, or made public in any form whatsoever, either electronic, mechanical, by means of photocopying, recordings or any other manner, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover EMD 2005 Netherlands.Qxd
    Current Immigration Debates in Europe: A Publication of the European Migration Dialogue Jan Niessen, Yongmi Schibel and Cressida Thompson (eds.) The Netherlands Vera Marinelli Jan Niessen, Yongmi Schibel and Cressida Thompson (eds.) Current Immigration Debates in Europe: A Publication of the European Migration Dialogue The Netherlands Vera Marinelli for FORUM (Institut voor Multikulturele Ontwikkeling) With the support of the European Commission Directorate-General Justice, Freedom and Security September 2005 The Migration Policy Group (MPG) is an independent organisation committed to policy development on migration and mobility, and diversity and anti-discrimination by facilitating the exchange between stakeholders from all sectors of society, with the aim of contributing to innovative and effective responses to the challenges posed by migration and diversity. This report is part of a series of 16 country reports prepared as a product of the European Migration Dialogue (EMD). The EMD is a partnership of key civil society organisations dedicated to linking the national and European debates on immigration and integration. It is supported by the European Commission, Directorate-General Justice, Freedom and Security, under the INTI funding programme. The individual reports on Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK are available from MPG’s website, together with a preface and introduction. See Jan Niessen, Yongmi Schibel and Cressida Thompson (eds.), Current Immigration Debates in Europe: A Publication of the European Migration Dialogue, MPG/Brussels, September 2005, ISBN 2-930399-18-X. Brussels/Utrecht, September 2005 © Migration Policy Group The Netherlands Vera Marinelli1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • General Affairs and External Relations *
    9379/03 (Presse 138) GENERAL AFFAIRS AND EXTERNAL RELATIONS * 2509th Council meeting - EXTERNAL RELATIONS - Brussels, 19-20 May 2003 Presidents : Mr Giorgos PAPANDREOU Minister for Foreign Affairs Mr Giannos PAPANTONIOU Minister for Defence Mr Andreas LOVERDOS State Secretary for Foreign Affairs (Development Assistance and International Financial Transactions) of the Hellenic Republic * The 2508th session on General Affairs is the subject of a separate press release (doc. 9377/03 Presse 137) Internet: http://ue.eu.int/ E-mail: [email protected] For further information call 32 2 285 82 39 32 2 285 60 83 - 32 2 285 81 11 9379/03 (Presse 138) 1 EN 19-20.V.2003 CONTENTS 1 PARTICIPANTS................................................................................................................................ 4 ITEMS DEBATED EUROPEAN SECURITY AND DEFENSE POLICY ........................................................................ 7 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................ 7 DECLARATION ON EU MILITARY CAPABILITIES ........................................................ 13 WESTERN BALKANS - Conclusions.............................................................................................. 16 EU-RUSSIA RELATIONS................................................................................................................ 17 MIDDLE EAST ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Development Now and in the Future
    FINANCING DEVELOPMENT NOW AND IN THE FUTURE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NETHERLANDS AND BEYOND Ries Kamphof, Gabi Spitz, Evelien Boonstoppel Amsterdam, May 28, 2015 Kaleidos Research / Pakhuis De Zwijger / Piet Heinkade 181-H / 1019 HC Amsterdam T +3188 7120360 / www.kaleidosresearch.nl / [email protected] / @KaleidosR . Kaleidos Research is part of NCDO Foundation DISCLAIMER The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Kaleidos Research or NCDO. Responsibility for the information and views expressed lies entirely with the authors. Reproduction is permitted with accreditation of source. Kaleidos Research and the authors expressly disclaim any liability further to the use of the information herein contained. Kaleidos Research (2015) 2 / 60 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their gratitude to the experts who made time in their busy schedules to participate in this research. They have enriched us with many new perspectives and their knowledge and experience provided valuable input to the analyses and backgrounds described in the report. A special word of thanks goes to Erik Lundsgaarde (independent consultant), Hannah Cameron (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) and Niels Keijzer (Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, DIE) who were willing to review the report in detail and gave very useful feedback. We would also like to thank our colleagues at NCDO, especially Edith van Ewijk and Ritha van der Burg, for their feedback and practical support. Kaleidos Research: Ries Kamphof Gabi Spitz Evelien Boonstoppel 3 / 60 CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS 5 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1. Previous International Agreements on Development Assistance 6 1.2. The Changing Role of ODA and International Public Finance 7 1.3.
    [Show full text]