DOCSLIB.ORG

1997 Kane County Solid Waste Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1997 Kane County Solid Waste Plan Update KANE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FIVE YEAR UPDATE November, 1997 VOLUME 1 Prepared by the Kane County Department of Environmental Management Geneva, Illinois Adopted by the Kane County Board 1997 KANE COUNTY BOARD MEMBERS Michael W. McCoy, Chairman William Morse Michael Arians District 25, Hampshire District 15, Elgin Rudolf Neuberger Penelope Cameron District 8, Aurora District 4, Aurora Donald Rage Bonnie Campbell District 23, Sleepy Hollow District 21, W. Dundee Mary Richards Jan Carlson District 2, Aurora District 26, Elbum James Spear Jack Cook District 24, Carpentersville District 20, Elgin Karen Steve-McConnaughay Paul Greviskes District 14, St. Charles District 6, Aurora Dorothy Sanchez Tom Hartwell District 1, Aurora District 16, Elgin Jackie Tredup John Hoscheit District 22, Elgin District 12, St. Charles Caryl VanOvermeiren Catherine Hurlbut District 13, St. Charles District 19, Elgin Douglas Weigand Gerald Jones District 10, Batavia District 7, Aurora Donald Wolfe Dennis Kosinski District 18, Elgin District 17, Elgin John Wood Robert McCormaughay District 3, Aurora District 11, Geneva William Wyatt James Mitchell District 5, Aurora District 9, Aurora ICANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Timothy Harbaugh, P.E., Director Gary Mielke, Recycling Coordinator Steve Garrison, Manager of Landfill Operations Maureen Anderson, Stormwater Management Planning Plan Consultants Plan Update compiled by Engineering Solutions, Inc., Geneva, IL Chapter 5 Evaluation of Alternative Waste Technologies prepared by Andrews Environmental Engineering, Inc., Warrenville, IL Evaluation of Waste Markets Report contained in Appendix II prepared by HDR Engineering, Inc., Chicago, IL. Ill KANE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FIVE YEAR UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary and Conclusions Chapter 1.0 Introduction Chapter 2.0 Solid Waste Needs Assessment Waste Composition and Generation Rates Projecting Kane County Demographics Projecting Kane County Waste Generation at Chapter 3.0 Waste Reduction Existing Programs and Goals to Expand Source Reduction Household Hazardous Waste Tire Processing Waste Oil Processing Latex Paint Recycling Landscape Waste Composting Household Appliance Recycling Battery Collection Chapter 4.0 Recycling C: fri1/4 Present Recycling in Kane County Projecting Recycling Goals Residential Recycling Commercial Recycling Construction and Demolition Recycling Recycling Education Chapter 5.0 Assessment of Alternative and Emerging Technologies 4- au— Gaga() Chapter 6.0 Transfer Stations , (01- Chapter 7.0 Landfilling 7t. e- Settler's Hill Landfill Projecting Landfill Capacity in Illinois Future Landfill Activities in Kane County iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On November 10, 1992 Kane County adopted the Solid Waste Management Plan, prepared in compliance with the Illinois Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act (415 ILCS 15/1 et seq). The Planning and Recycling Act requires that, "each county waste management plan shall be updated and reviewed every five years, and any necessary or appropriate revisions shall be submitted to the (Illinois Environmental Protection) Agency for review and comment." This document, the Kane County Solid Waste Management Plan update (Update), has been prepared in accordance with this requirement. The Kane County Plan was developed over a period of two years by the Kane County Development Department. A twenty member Solid Waste Plan Advisory Committee was appointed by the County Board in June 1990, reviewed the Plan during its development and made recommendations to the County. Each step of the planning process was also reviewed by the Development Committee of the County Board. In September 1995, the County Board directed the Department of Environmental Management, a new department created in June 1994, which now administers the solid waste program of the County, to begin this Update of the Plan. Each piece of the Plan Update was reviewed by the Solid Waste Committee. An assessment of solid waste needs found that in the base year of 1989, 490,820 tons of solid waste were generated, the equivalent of 8.4 pounds per person each day. In 1997, with an estimated population growth of approximately 18% since 1989, it is estimated that Kane County will generate 572,390 tons of waste; again, the equivalent of 8.4 pounds per person each day, of which 37% is residential waste, 28% is commercial waste, 22% is industrial waste, and 13% is construction and demolition waste. In 1989, approximately 9% of the waste stream was recycled. With aggressive recycling programs, the County has achieved a countywide recycling rate of 37.6% in 1996, and has set a 52% recycling rate goal by the year 2003. The County has the most aggressive recycling program in Illinois. Curbside recycling is offered to every resident. The County has adopted a multi-family recycling ordinance where owners of multi-family dwelling units must provide recycling service for the occupants of their buildings, and waste haulers must provide recycling services to all residential dwelling units they serve within Kane County. In addition, Kane County has adopted a commercial recycling ordinance. This ordinance requires all commercial establishments in the County to recycle the two largest recyclable materials in their waste stream. Haulers may not collect waste from any establishment that is not recycling. The County not only has adopted these ordinances, but they are being enforced. The County has developed educational programs targeted at both the general public and school populations. These actions have allowed our residential and commercial recycling programs to mature. Construction and demolition waste recycling has been a difficult challenge. The County will continue to pursue programs which will increase recycling of this portion of our waste stream. Programs aimed at reducing the amount of solid waste produced in the County will continue to be developed and expanded. These programs include source reduction, household hazardous waste collection events, tire collection events, waste oil collection events, latex paint drop-off facilities, landscape waste composting, household appliance recycling, and battery collection programs. The County commissioned a detailed evaluation of waste technologies be conducted. This study evaluated and compared several waste technologies to landfilling. Kane County has two active landfills. The Woodland Landfill, located in unincorporated St. Charles Township, is owned and operated by Waste Management of Illinois, Inc. This facility has a projected life of approximately two and a half years. Waste Management has committed that this landfill will not expand. The other active landfill is Settler's Hill, located in unincorporated Geneva Township, owned by Kane County and operated by Waste Management. This facility received siting approval by the -County Board for an expansion of 5.5 million cubic yards of capacity in January, 1994. The siting approval was challenged, and ultimately upheld in September, 1997. Upon receiving approval of this expansion, the County Board, the City of Geneva, and Waste Management entered into a three party binding agreement which resolved differences concerning this facility, and commits that Settler's Hill will cease accepting waste before January 1, 2008. To meet our future waste disposal needs, the Update departs from the philosophies of the original Plan. The original Plan called for the County to take all necessary steps to assure that future landfill capacity is available by developing a new landfill facility controlled by the County, and located within the County. The County formed a fifteen member Public Siting Advisory Committee, hired a professional consultant to work with the committee, and evaluated all of unincorporated Kane County for suitable landfill site locations. The findings of this effort were presented to the County Board in September, 1995. The Board resolved that Kane County will not pursue the acquisition of property, the development of, or siting approval for a new landfill in Kane County. As a result of the work conducted by this committee, the Plan Update does not support the development of new landfill capacity within unincorporated Kane County by any individual or organization. The Plan Update demonstrates adequate landfill capacity exists to meet our long-term disposal needs, and landfill tipping fees have become very competitive. This trend is projected to continue based on existing, permitted landfill capacity in Illinois, market conditions, and competition. In order to access this existing landfill capacity, a series of waste transfer stations, owned and operated by the private sector are proposed to be developed. Transfer stations consolidate waste from waste collection trucks to semi-truck loads for more efficient transport over long distances. With a network of transfer stations and continued competitive landfill pricing, waste disposal costs are projected to remain stable. vi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On November 10, 1992 Kane County adopted the Solid Waste Management Plan, prepared in compliance with the Illinois Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act (415 ILCS 15/1 et seq). The Planning and Recycling Act requires that, "each county waste management plan shall be updated and reviewed every five years, and any necessary or appropriate revisions shall be submitted to the (Illinois Environmental Protection) Agency for review and comment." This document, the Kane County Solid Waste Management Plan update (Update), has been
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Item 4.4 Towards Zero
    TOWARDS ZERO BYRON WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCE RECOVERY STRATEGY Technical Report 20 FEBRUARY, 2019 CONTACT DOMINIC SCHLIEBS Associate Technical Director – Waste Advisory T 07 3337 0010 Arcadis M 0432 469 083 120 Edward Street E [email protected] Brisbane QLD 4000 Copyright © 2015 Arcadis. All rights reserved. arcadis.com BYRON SHIRE COUNCIL TOWARDS ZERO: BYRON WASTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOURCE RECOVERY STRATEGY Technical Report Dharshi Hasthanayake, Tayla Edmunds, Joshua Benjamin, Duncan Lummis, Dominic Schliebs Author and Richard Collins Checker Dominic Schliebs Approver Dominic Schliebs Report No R02 Date 20/02/2019 Revision Text 02 This report has been prepared for Byron Shire Council in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment for Integrated Waste Strategy Development dated 29 March 2018. Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Limited (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of this report by any third party. REVISIONS Approved Revision Date Description Prepared by by 01 02/11/18 Draft for review DH, TE, DS & RC DS DH, TE, JB, DS & 02 20/02/19 Final DS RC V CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 3 Scope ............................................................................................................................. 3 Strategic framework...................................................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2007
    Sustainability Report 2007 Sustainability Report 07 KYOCERA MITA GROUP Corporate Attitude Corporate Attitude Special Feature （Interview） Corporate Motto Corporate Motto Respect the Divine and Love People Preserve the spirit to work fairly and honorably, respecting people, our work, our company and our global community. Environmental Report Management Rationale To provide opportunities for the material and intellectual growth of all our employees, and through our joint efforts, contribute to the advancement of society and humankind. Management Philosophy To coexist harmoniously with nature and society. Harmonious coexistence is the underlying foundation of all our business activities as we work together to create a world of abundance and peace. Social Report Environmental Data Round-table Discussion Involving Third Parties 01 KYOCERA MITA Sustainability Report 2007 Editorial Policy and Duration Contents This report covers the environmental protection activities conducted at domestic business sites of Kyocera Mita Cor- Corporate Attitude 01� poration and its affiliates during fiscal year 2006 (April 2006 to March 2007). Corporate Motto ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・�01� We used the Environmental Reporting Guidelines of the Jap- Top Commitment・ ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・�03 Corporate Attitude anese Ministry of the Environment as a reference in prepar- � ing this report. The history of our environmental efforts be- fore fiscal 2006, as well as activities at our overseas plants, Special Feature （Interview） 05� are also contained herein. , , , This year s cover design, like last year s, represents our cor- Kyocera Mita s environmental � � porate motto, "Living Together–harmonious coexistence with management approach, � nature." embodied in its long-life printers/� � Business sites of Kyocera Mita Corporation multifunction machines Japan: Head Office, Yoga Office, Tamaki Plant, Hirakata Plant Guest: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Vermont Waste Characterization Study
    2018 VERMONT WASTE CHARACTERIZATION FINAL REPORT | DECEMBER Prepared14, 2018 for: VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, SOLID WASTE PROGRAM Prepared by: With support from: 2018 Vermont Waste Characterization FINAL REPORT | DECEMBER 14, 2018 REPORT TO THE: Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, Solid Waste Program Prepared by: With support from: 2018 VERMONT WASTE CHARACTERIZATION | FINAL REPORT Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 Gate Surveys to Determine Generator Source ................................................................................................. 1 Residential Waste Composition ........................................................................................................................ 3 ICI Waste Composition...................................................................................................................................... 4 Aggregate Composition .................................................................................................................................... 4 Materials Recovery Rates ................................................................................................................................. 5 Construction and Demolition Waste ................................................................................................................ 5 Backyard Composting ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trash & Recycling Rates Effective 7/1/21
    XXXXXX Second Quarter, 2021 Single-family Home Edition Trash & Recycling Rates Effective 7/1/21 Rates for 1-unit homes include trash, compost, Rates for 2-4 unit homes include trash, compost, recycling and bulky pickup service. recycling and bulky pickup service. • Minimum trash service capacity is 20 gallons per unit. • Choose individual or shared containers to meet your needs. 20 gal $30.14/mo. $90.42/qtr. 32 gal $36.37/mo. $109.11/qtr. 64 gal $76.30/mo. $228.90/qtr. 20 gal 32 gal 64 gal 96 gal 96 gal $122.63/mo. $367.89/qtr. $46.13/mo. $52.36/mo. $92.29/mo. $138.62/mo. You will be billed an additional $138.39/qtr. $157.08/qtr. $276.87/qtr. $415.86/qtr. $15.99 per unit per month for recycling service. • Free backyard collection service for qualifying frail seniors and disabled residents. • Rate discount available for qualifying, low-income seniors. Contact Waste Management at 510-613-8710 to apply. Recyclables Must Be Loose! Recyclables must be placed loose into your recycling cart, free of a plastic bag liner to ensure workers are able to see the items and separate them by material type. Why aren’t plastic bags, film plastic, clear thin plastic and bubble wrap accepted in the recycling cart? Film plastic contaminates the recycling and slows down the recycling process by jamming or damaging machines used to separate recycling by material type. When film plastic and plastic bags mix with other recyclables, they are difficult to sort out. Plastic bags also create a health and safety hazard for recycling workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Materials Management Advisory Committee Report to the General Assembly July 1, 2021 I
    Illinois Materials Management Advisory Committee Report to the General Assembly July 1, 2021 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 4 A) Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 B) Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 6 C) Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 7 II. Background ............................................................................................................................................... 9 A) Overview of Illinois Environmental Laws and Regulations ............................................................... 11 1) Illinois Environmental Protection Act ............................................................................................ 11 2) Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act ....................................................................................... 12 3) Solid Waste Management Act ........................................................................................................ 12 4) Material-Specific Laws ................................................................................................................... 13 5) Pollution Control
    [Show full text]
  • IV. Reference Year Population, Waste Generation, and Waste Reduction [ORC Section 3734.53 (A)(5)-(6)]
    Darke County Solid Waste Management Plan Update 2015 IV. Reference Year Population, Waste Generation, and Waste Reduction [ORC Section 3734.53 (A)(5)-(6)] A. Reference Year Population and Residential/Commercial Waste Generation The population of Darke County in the reference year, 2012, was estimated to be 52, 507. This estimate was published by the U.S. Census Bureau and is based on the 2010 census.1 Ohio’s solid waste law states that when a municipal corporation is located in more than one solid waste district, the entire corporation is to be included in the jurisdiction of the solid waste district where the majority of the population resides. As a result of this requirement, the Darke County Solid Waste Management District population must be adjusted. The Village of Bradford is located in both Darke and Miami Counties. The Miami county population of Bradford is greater than the population residing in Darke County. Therefore, all of the Village of Bradford is included in the Miami County Solid Waste Management District. The Village of Burkettsville is located in both Darke and Mercer Counties. The population in Mercer County is more than the population in Darke County so the entire population of Burkettsville is included with Mercer County. The adjusted population of the Darke County Solid Waste Management District for the reference year is 51,675. This is the Darke County SWMD population for 2012 which will be used throughout this Plan. Table IV-1.A. Reference Year Population 2012 Darke County population before adjustments 52,507 Less
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2017 Fact Sheet
    Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2017 Fact Sheet Assessing Trends in Material Generation, Recycling, Composting, Combustion with Energy Recovery and Landfilling in the United States November 2019 Introduction The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has collected and reported data on the generation and disposition of municipal solid waste (MSW) in the United States for more than 30 years. This information is used to measure the success of materials management programs across the country and to characterize the national waste stream. These facts and figures are based on the most recent information, which is from calendar year 2017. In 2017, in the United States, approximately 268 million tons (U.S. short tons unless specified) of MSW were generated (See Figure 1). Of the MSW generated, approximately 67 million tons of MSW were recycled and 27 million tons of MSW were composted. Together, more than 94 million tons of MSW were recycled and composted, equivalent to a 35.2 percent recycling and composting rate (See Figure 2). In addition, more than 34 million tons of MSW (12.7 percent) were combusted with energy recovery. Finally, more than 139 million tons of MSW (52.1 percent) were landfilled (See Figure 3 and Table 1). Information about waste generation and disposal is an important foundation for managing materials. Sustainably managing materials requires focusing on the life cycle of a product, from the time it is produced, used, reused and ultimately recycled or discarded. This is known as Sustainable Materials Management (SMM). SMM refers to the use and reuse of materials in the most productive and sustainable way across their entire life cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Producer Responsibility for Packaging Consultation Document 24 March 2021
    Extended Producer Responsibility for Packaging Consultation Document 24 March 2021 1 of 213 We are the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. We’re responsible for improving and protecting the environment, growing the green economy and supporting our world-class food, farming and fishing industries. We work closely with our 33 agencies and arm’s length bodies on our ambition to make our air purer, our water cleaner, our land greener and our food more sustainable. Our mission is to restore and enhance the environment for the next generation, and to leave the environment in a better state than we found it. © Crown copyright 2021 This information is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ This publication is available at Gov.uk Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] www.gov.uk/defra 2 of 213 Contents 1. Executive summary .............................................................................................. 4 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 14 3. Background ........................................................................................................ 21 4. What we want to achieve – principles, outcomes and targets ....................... 26 5. Producer obligations for full net cost payments and reporting ..................... 45 6. Producer disposable cups takeback obligation .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska Recycling Study
    NEBRASKA RECYCLING STUDY March 2015 Study Conducted by: University of Nebraska Public Policy Center Joslyn Institute for Sustainable Communities University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Bureau of Sociological Research Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 Section 1: Study Overview and Methods...................................................................................... 10 Section 2: Innovative Practices ..................................................................................................... 16 Section 3: Estimate of Nebraska Recycling Rate ......................................................................... 23 Section 4: Gaps in Nebraska Recycling ........................................................................................ 28 Section 5: Other Issues.................................................................................................................. 40 Section 6: Economic Impact ......................................................................................................... 43 Section 8: City Clerk and County Treasurer Perspectives ............................................................ 50 Section 9: Regional Meetings and Post-Meeting Survey Results ................................................. 56 Section 10: Conclusions and Recommendations .......................................................................... 62 Appendix A: References ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts 2010-2020 Solid Waste Master Plan April 2013
    MASSACHUSETTS 2010-2020 SOLID WASTE MASTER PLAN APRIL 2013 Pathway to Zero Waste Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i List of Tables ii List of Figures ii Executive Summary iii Chapter One: Introduction and Background 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Why are waste reduction and waste management important? 2 1.3 What is in our waste and how do we manage it? 4 1.4 Waste Management Challenges 2010-2020? 11 1.5 Our Vision for Materials Management in Massachusetts 13 Chapter Two: Goals and Policy Framework 16 2.1 Short and Long Term Goals 16 2.2 What are the priority materials? 18 2.3 Policy Framework 20 2.4 Moving Forward 22 Chapter Three: Strategies to Maximize Efficiency of Materials Use, 25 Increase Recycling And Composting, and Build Markets 3.1 Commercial and Institutional Recycling and Composting 25 3.2 Residential Recycling and Composting 28 3.3 Strengthen Incentives through Producer Responsibility 32 3.4 Organics Diversion and Market Development 35 3.5 Construction and Demolition Debris Materials Diversion 38 and Market Development 3.6 Build Local and Regional Recycling Markets 40 3.7 Commonwealth Leading by Example 42 3.8 Keep Toxics Out of the Waste Stream 44 Chapter Four: Strategies to Maximize the Environmental Performance of 47 Solid Waste Facilities 4.1 Municipal Waste Combustion Moratorium 47 4.2 Improve Solid Waste Facility Waste Ban and Recycling Performance 48 4.3 Improve Environmental Performance of Landfills and 49 Municipal Waste Combustors Chapter Five: Strategies to Develop Integrated Solid Waste Management Systems 52 i LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Massachusetts Solid Waste Management in 2000 and 2009 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Municipal Solid Waste Composition Figure 2 Construction and Demolition Debris Composition Figure 3 Massachusetts Solid Waste Management: 2000-2009 Figure 4 Solid Waste Management System Material Flows Figure 5 Potential Additional Annual Recycling by Material Type by 2020 Figure 6 Pay-As-You-Throw (PAYT) vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP)
    Solid Waste Management Plan Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste Management Board City of Fredericksburg and Stafford County, Virginia Prepared For: Prepared By: Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste Draper Aden Associates Management Board (R-Board) 1030 Wilmer Avenue, Suite 100 489 Eskimo Hill Road Richmond, Virginia 23227 Stafford, Virginia 22554 May 8, 2020 For Final Approval Rappahannock Regional Solid Waste Management Board Solid Waste Management Plan May 8, 2020 For Final Approval Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Plan Adoption .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Legislation ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Authority (9 VAC 20-130-20) ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Purpose (9 VAC 20-130-40) ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Recycling (9VAC20-130-125) ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.6 Planning Area ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report of Recyclables
    Onondaga County Resource Recovery Agency 2019 ANNUAL REPORT ON RECYCLABLES RECOVERED This report is submitted pursuant to: NYSDEC Permit Number 7-3142-00028/00002-0 Certificate to Operate Onondaga County Resource Recovery Facility; NYSDEC Permit Number 7-3156-00047/00001-0 Permit to Construct and Operate the OCRRA Landfill; NYSDEC Permit Number 7-3148-00048/00001-0 Solid Waste Transfer Station-Ley Creek; and NYSDEC Permit Number 7-3142-00036/00001-0 Solid Waste Transfer Station-Rock Cut Road. Period reported: January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 Date: March 1, 2020 Planning Unit: County of Onondaga including the City of Syracuse, excluding the Town and Village of Skaneateles Contact Person: Ms. Dereth Glance, Executive Director, OCRRA 100 Elwood Davis Road North Syracuse, NY 13212-4312 1. 2019 Recycling Data OCRRA (Onondaga County Resource Recovery Agency) is a non-profit public benefit corporation charged with managing solid waste in Onondaga County (with the exception of the Town and Village of Skaneateles). This includes proper disposal of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) and recycling. Since beginning operations in 1990, OCRRA has overseen the recycling of 12 million+ tons of material. In 2019, 36,974 tons of materials were collected from households through the blue bin curbside recycling program; there are approximately 180,000 households in the OCRRA Service Area, and a population of approximately 457,000. In 2019, 468,456 tons were recycled through mandatory and voluntary recycling efforts (both residential and commercial) in the community, for a total recycling rate of 55% (see Table 1). OCRRA also met permitting requirements for the Waste-to-Energy (WTE) facility set forth by the NYSDEC to maintain a 40% processible recycling rate1, by reaching 40%, or comprising 183,989 tons (see Table 2).
    [Show full text]