(CEDO) Location: Village Moti Virani, Kutch District, Gujarat, India

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Field: Wildlife Conservation & Research Name: Centre for Desert and Ocean (CEDO) Location: Village Moti Virani, Kutch district, Gujarat, India Name of Position: Nature and Wildlife Intern (10) Brief Description of Organization: CEDO is a registered trust for wildlife conservation, research, bird tourism, nature education, and native plant afforestation working since 2005 in a rural area of the Kutch desert. The organization has a 10-room facility for use by bird watchers, students, and researchers. CEDO works in 40 villages of Kutch to provide nature education. More than 1,500 students from local schools participate CEDO’s one-day nature education camps each year. In addition, the organization houses a native flora nursery of 10,000 plants and plants the same number of plants in schools, villages and denuded areas of Kutch annually. Information Specific to the Internship: Nature and Wildlife Intern Qualifications: This internship opportunity is open to both undergraduate and graduate students. Primary Responsibilities: This internship is flexible based on the experience and interests of the applicant. CEDO is able to provide support and guidance for projects in wildlife, ecology, botany, and social work. Please contact CEDO directly to explore concrete project possibilities. Schedule: Summer internship opportunity of up to 8 weeks in duration. Stipend/Assistance: CEDO is able to provide the following support: An on-site, neat, clean, and self-contained room with 24-hour running water ($15/day). Three daily vegetarian meals ($10/day), plus mineral water for drinking. Transportation for research work. Pickup and drop-off from the Bhuj airport or railway station. Additional Information: Village Moti Virani is located 53 kilometers from Bhuj, the capital of Kutch district. To Apply: Send your resume/CV, cover letter, and one letter of recommendation to Jugal Tiwari, Founder ([email protected]). Website: http://www.cedobirding.org .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Reconstruction & Renewal of Bhuj City
Reconstruction & Renewal of Bhuj City The Gujarat Earthquake Experience - Converting Adversity into an Opportunity a presentation by: Rajesh Kishore, CEO, Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority Gujarat, India Bhuj City – Key Facts A 500 year old traditional unplanned city Headquarters of Kutch district – seat of district government Population of about 1,50,000 Strong Livelihood base - handicrafts and handloom work Disaster Profile ¾ Earthquakes – Active seismic faults surround the city ¾ Drought – every alternate year 2370 dead, 3187 injured One of the 6402 houses destroyed worst affected cities 6933 houses damaged in the earthquake of 2001 + markets, offices, civic Infrastructure etc 2 Vulnerability of Urban Areas – Pre-Earthquake ¾ Traditionally laid out city - Historical, old buildings with poor quality of construction ¾ Poor accessibility in city areas for immediate evacuation, rescue and relief operations ¾ Inadequate public sensitivity for disaster preparedness ¾ Absence of key institutions for disaster preparedness urban planning, emergency response, disaster mitigation ¾ Inadequate and inappropriate equipment/ facilities/ manpower for search and rescue capabilities 3 URBAN RE-ENGINEERING GUIDING PRINCIPLES ¾ RECONSTRUCTION AS A DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY - Provide a Better Living Environment ¾ DEVELOPING MULTI-HAZARD RESISTANT CAPABILITY - Improved Technologies and Materials e.g; ¾ ENSURING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION - In Planning and Implementation ¾ PLANNING URBAN RE-ENGINEERING - On Scientific and Rational Criteria ¾ RESTORING
[Show full text]
Junagadh Agricultural University Junagadh-362 001
Junagadh Agricultural University Junagadh-362 001 Information Regarding Registered Students in the Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh Registered Sr. Name of the Major Minor Remarks Faculty Subject for the Approved Research Title No. students Advisor Advisor (If any) Degree 1 Agriculture Agronomy M.A. Shekh Ph.D. Dr. M.M. Dr. J. D. Response of castor var. GCH 4 to irrigation 2004 Modhwadia Gundaliya scheduling based on IW/CPE ratio under varying levels of biofertilizers, N and P 2 Agriculture Agronomy R.K. Mathukia Ph.D. Dr. V.D. Dr. P. J. Response of castor to moisture conservation 2005 Khanpara Marsonia practices and zinc fertilization under rainfed condition 3 Agriculture Agronomy P.M. Vaghasia Ph.D. Dr. V.D. Dr. B. A. Response of groundnut to moisture conservation 2005 Khanpara Golakia practices and sulphur nutrition under rainfed condition 4 Agriculture Agronomy N.M. Dadhania Ph.D. Dr. B.B. Dr. P. J. Response of multicut forage sorghum [Sorghum 2006 Kaneria Marsonia bicolour (L.) Moench] to varying levels of organic manure, nitrogen and bio-fertilizers 5 Agriculture Agronomy V.B. Ramani Ph.D. Dr. K.V. Dr. N.M. Efficiency of herbicides in wheat (Triticum 2006 Jadav Zalawadia aestivum L.) and assessment of their persistence through bio assay technique 6 Agriculture Agronomy G.S. Vala Ph.D. Dr. V.D. Dr. B. A. Efficiency of various herbicides and 2006 Khanpara Golakia determination of their persistence through bioassay technique for summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) 7 Agriculture Agronomy B.M. Patolia Ph.D. Dr. V.D. Dr. B. A. Response of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) to 2006 Khanpara Golakia moisture conservation practices and zinc fertilization 8 Agriculture Agronomy N.U.
[Show full text]
(PANCHAYAT) Government of Gujarat
ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT (PANCHAYAT) Government of Gujarat ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) FOR GUJARAT RURAL ROADS (MMGSY) PROJECT Under AIIB Loan Assistance May 2017 LEA Associates South Asia Pvt. Ltd., India Roads & Buildings Department (Panchayat), Environmental and Social Impact Government of Gujarat Assessment (ESIA) Report Table of Content 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 MUKHYA MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA ................................................................ 1 1.3 SOCIO-CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT: GUJARAT .................................... 3 1.3.1 Population Profile ........................................................................................ 5 1.3.2 Social Characteristics ................................................................................... 5 1.3.3 Distribution of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Population ................. 5 1.3.4 Notified Tribes in Gujarat ............................................................................ 5 1.3.5 Primitive Tribal Groups ............................................................................... 6 1.3.6 Agriculture Base .......................................................................................... 6 1.3.7 Land use Pattern in Gujarat .........................................................................
[Show full text]
The Reconstruction of Bhuj Case Study: Integration of Disaster
The Reconstruction of Bhuj Case Study: Integration of Disaster Mitigation into Planning and Financing Urban Infrastructure after an Earthquake B.R. Balachandran Introduction to EPC and its Involvement in Bhuj The Environmental Planning Collaborative (EPC), established in 1996, is a not for profit, private, professional planning and development management company. The company provides professional consultancy services primarily to urban local bodies including municipal corporations and urban development authorities. EPC also works with a variety of other agencies involved in urban development such as state government departments, international funding and lending agencies, special purpose vehicles for urban development and non-government/autonomous organizations. Most projects are undertaken in a collaborative and participatory manner with significant involvement from the client, major stakeholders and other related agencies. EPC’s work is primarily of four types: (1) urban and regional development planning, (2) environmental and policy planning, (3) development management and (4) research and development. Immediately after the earthquake, EPC deputed its personnel in Bhuj to study the situation and initiate public consultations. This evolved into a USAID funded project entitled “Initiative for Planned and Participatory Reconstruction in Kutch” (IPPR) in collaboration with The Communities Group International (TCGI). The IPPR consisted of experiments in participatory planning at the regional level and in urban and rural communities. This was followed by a United States-Asia Environmental Partnership (USAEP)-funded project, “Atlas for Post-Disaster Reconstruction” under which EPC in collaboration with the Planning and The Reconstruction of Bhuj Development Company (PADCO) prepared maps of the four towns showing plot level information on intensity of damage, land use and number of floors.
[Show full text]
Annex 7 Municipal and Environmental Infrastructure
Annex 7 Municipal and Environmental Infrastructure Introduction Gujarat has 6 municipal corporations and 143 municipal towns. Of these, 5 municipal corporations1/ and 57 municipal towns have been affected by the earthquake. The assessment team visited the worst hit towns such as Bhuj, Anjar, Bhachau, Rapar and Gandhidham in Kutch district and moderately hit Ahmedabad city during February 13 to 17, 2001 to review the damages caused to the urban and municipal infrastructure and the repairs, rehabilitation and reconstruction needs. The assessment team also received briefing from the state government and the municipal staff. From the various reports provided by the GOG and from discussions the assessment team held in the field, it was observed that the government machinery moved quite expeditiously to the affected urban areas and the basic services were restored although at a significantly lower scale. Delimitation of the Affected Area The impact of the earthquake on the municipal infrastructure varied widely among the districts. Severe damages were caused in several towns in Kutch, Rajkot and Surendranagar districts and some damages to several cities/towns in the remaining districts. Municipal infrastructure in Ahmedabad city also suffered damages. Based on available information, urban infrastructure in 15 cities were damaged to significant degree. The table below summarizes the major impacts district-wise. Damages were reported from other Corporation/ Municipalities, but details were not readily available. The Urban Development Dept., GOG (UDD) is currently conducting a detailed survey of the damages in the municipal areas and results are awaited. Affected Municipality/City Severely Affected District Kutch Bhuj, Anjar, Rapar, Bhachau, Gandhidham, Mandvi Rajkot Morvi, Wankaner Surendranagar Surendranagar, Limdi, Thangadh, Dhrangadhra, Halwad, Wadhwan Ahmedabad Ahmedabad Situation Prior to Disaster Event Ahmedabad, Vadodara, Rajkot, Surat, and Jamnagar are the large cities which suffered medium to low damages.
[Show full text]
08Kutch Kashmireq.Pdf
Key Idea From Kutch to Kashmir: Lessons for Use Since, October 11, 2005 early hours AIDMI team is in Kashmir assessing losses and needs. The biggest gap found is of understanding earthquake. Five key gaps are addressed here. nderstanding India's vulnerability: Using earthquake science to enhance Udisaster preparedness Every year, thousands flock to Kashmir, in India and Pakistan to marvel at her spectacular scenery and majestic mountain ranges. However, the reality of our location and mountainous surroundings is an inherent threat of devastating earthquakes. In addition to accepting earthquakes as a South Asian reality, we as humanitarian respondents as well as risk reduction specialists must now look to science to enhance disaster risk mitigation and preparedness.The humanitarian communalities know little about what scientific communities have discovered and what could be used to mitigate risk of earthquakes. Similarly, scientific communities need to know how to put scientific knowledge in mitigation perspective from the point of view of non-scientific communities. How do we bridge this gap? We at AIDMI acknowledged this gap, and from the overlapping questions, we selected four key areas relevant to Kashmir and South Asia and discussed them in this issue. Editorial Advisors: How do we use scientific knowledge on earthquakes? Dr. Ian Davis Certain regions of South Asia are more vulnerable to earthquakes than others. Kashmir Cranfield University, UK ranks high on this list. Fortunately, geologists know which regions are more vulnerable Kala Peiris De Costa and why. When this information is disseminated to NGOs, relief agencies and Siyath Foundation, Sri Lanka governments, they can quickly understand where investments, attention and disaster Khurshid Alam preparedness measures should be focussed.
[Show full text]
Kutch District Disaster Management Plan 2017-18
Kutch District Disaster Management Plan 2017-18 District: Kutch Gujarat State Disaster Management Authority Collector Office Disaster Management Cell Kutch – Bhuj Kutch District Disaster Management Plan 2016-17 Name of District : KUTCH Name of Collector : ……………………IAS Date of Update plan : June- 2017 Signature of District Collector : _______________________ INDEX Sr. No. Detail Page No. 1 Chapter-1 Introduction 1 1.01 Introduction 1 1.02 What is Disaster 1 1.03 Aims & Objective of plan 2 1.04 Scope of the plan 2 1.05 Evolution of the plan 3 1.06 Authority and Responsibility 3 1.07 Role and responsibility 5 1.08 Approach to Disaster Management 6 1.09 Warning, Relief and Recovery 6 1.10 Mitigation, Prevention and Preparedness 6 1.11 Finance 7 1.12 Disaster Risk Management Cycle 8 1.13 District Profile 9 1.14 Area and Administration 9 1.15 Climate 10 1.16 River and Dam 11 1.17 Port and fisheries 11 1.18 Salt work 11 1.19 Live stock 11 1.20 Industries 11 1.21 Road and Railway 11 1.22 Health and Education 12 2 Chapter-2 Hazard Vulnerability and Risk Assessment 13 2.01 Kutch District past Disaster 13 2.02 Hazard Vulnerability and Risk Assessment of Kutch district 14 2.03 Interim Guidance and Risk & Vulnerability Ranking Analysis 15 2.04 Assign the Probability Rating 15 2.05 Assign the Impact Rating 16 2.06 Assign the Vulnerability 16 2.07 Ranking Methodology of HRVA 17 2.08 Identify Areas with Highest Vulnerability 18 2.09 Outcome 18 2.10 Hazard Analysis 18 2.11 Earthquake 19 2.12 Flood 19 2.13 Cyclone 20 2.14 Chemical Disaster 20 2.15 Tsunami 20 2.16 Epidemics 21 2.17 Drought 21 2.18 Fire 21 Sr.
[Show full text]
Gujarat Cotton Crop Estimate 2019 - 2020
GUJARAT COTTON CROP ESTIMATE 2019 - 2020 GUJARAT - COTTON AREA PRODUCTION YIELD 2018 - 2019 2019-2020 Area in Yield per Yield Crop in 170 Area in lakh Crop in 170 Kgs Zone lakh hectare in Kg/Ha Kgs Bales hectare Bales hectare kgs Kutch 0.563 825.00 2,73,221 0.605 1008.21 3,58,804 Saurashtra 19.298 447.88 50,84,224 18.890 703.55 78,17,700 North Gujarat 3.768 575.84 12,76,340 3.538 429.20 8,93,249 Main Line 3.492 749.92 15,40,429 3.651 756.43 16,24,549 Total 27.121 512.38 81,74,214 26.684 681.32 1,06,94,302 Note: Average GOT (Lint outturn) is taken as 34% Changes from Previous Year ZONE Area Yield Crop Lakh Hectare % Kgs/Ha % 170 kg Bales % Kutch 0.042 7.46% 183.21 22.21% 85,583 31.32% Saurashtra -0.408 -2.11% 255.67 57.08% 27,33,476 53.76% North Gujarat -0.23 -6.10% -146.64 -25.47% -3,83,091 -30.01% Main Line 0.159 4.55% 6.51 0.87% 84,120 5.46% Total -0.437 -1.61% 168.94 32.97% 25,20,088 30.83% Gujarat cotton crop yield is expected to rise by 32.97% and crop is expected to increase by 30.83% Inspite of excess and untimely rains at many places,Gujarat is poised to produce a very large cotton crop SAURASHTRA Area in Yield Crop in District Hectare Kapas 170 Kgs Bales Lint Kg/Ha Maund/Bigha Surendranagar 3,55,100 546.312 13.00 11,41,149 Rajkot 2,64,400 714.408 17.00 11,11,115 Jamnagar 1,66,500 756.432 18.00 7,40,858 Porbandar 9,400 756.432 18.00 41,826 Junagadh 74,900 756.432 18.00 3,33,275 Amreli 4,02,900 756.432 18.00 17,92,744 Bhavnagar 2,37,800 756.432 18.00 10,58,115 Morbi 1,86,200 630.360 15.00 6,90,430 Botad 1,63,900 798.456 19.00 7,69,806 Gir Somnath 17,100 924.528 22.00 92,997 Devbhumi Dwarka 10,800 714.408 17.00 45,386 TOTAL 18,89,000 703.552 16.74 78,17,700 1 Bigha = 16 Guntha, 1 Hectare= 6.18 Bigha, 1 Maund= 20 Kg Saurashtra sowing area reduced by 2.11%, estimated yield increase 57.08%, estimated Crop increase by 53.76%.
[Show full text]
Government of India Ministry of Mines Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MINES LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 2678 TO BE ANSWERED ON 27.12.2018 BAUXITE MINING LEASE 2678. SHRI VINOD LAKHAMASHI CHAVDA: Will the Minister of MINES be pleased to state: (a) whether 11 Bauxite Mining Lease Applications from Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation which were forwarded to the Union Government in 2012 are under consideration; (b) if so, the details and the present status thereof; and (c) the time by which these 11 bauxite mining leases are likely to be approved by the Union Government? ANSWER THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR MINES AND COAL (SHRI HARIBHAI PARTHIBHAI CHAUDHARY) (a) to (c): The State Government of Gujarat had forwarded 11 proposals to the Ministry of Mines for the grant of Mining Leases of bauxite mineral in Jamnagar & Kutch District in favour of Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation (GMDC), a State Public Sector Undertaking, for seeking prior approval of the Central Government under Section 5(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (MMDR) Act, 1957 along with seeking relaxation of maximum area under section 6(1) (b) of the MMDR Act. The details of these 11 proposals are given in Annexure. The Ministry of Mines examined these proposals in consultation with the Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM), which is the technical arm of the Ministry. The 4 proposals (Sl. No. 4-7 of Annexure) were returned to the State Government on 1.9.2015 on the technical advice of IBM that due to insufficient mineralization, the optimal and scientific mining plan cannot be prepared. The remaining 7 proposals (Sl.
[Show full text]
Nesting in Paradise Bird Watching in Gujarat
Nesting in Paradise Bird Watching in Gujarat Tourism Corporation of Gujarat Limited Toll Free : 1800 200 5080 | www.gujarattourism.com Designed by Sobhagya Why is Gujarat such a haven for beautiful and rare birds? The secret is not hard to find when you look at the unrivalled diversity of eco- Merry systems the State possesses. There are the moist forested hills of the Dang District to the salt-encrusted plains of Kutch district. Deciduous forests like Gir National Park, and the vast grasslands of Kutch and Migration Bhavnagar districts, scrub-jungles, river-systems like the Narmada, Mahi, Sabarmati and Tapti, and a multitude of lakes and other wetlands. Not to mention a long coastline with two gulfs, many estuaries, beaches, mangrove forests, and offshore islands fringed by coral reefs. These dissimilar but bird-friendly ecosystems beckon both birds and bird watchers in abundance to Gujarat. Along with indigenous species, birds from as far away as Northern Europe migrate to Gujarat every year and make the wetlands and other suitable places their breeding ground. No wonder bird watchers of all kinds benefit from their visit to Gujarat's superb bird sanctuaries. Chhari Dhand Chhari Dhand Bhuj Chhari Dhand Conservation Reserve: The only Conservation Reserve in Gujarat, this wetland is known for variety of water birds Are you looking for some unique bird watching location? Come to Chhari Dhand wetland in Kutch District. This virgin wetland has a hill as its backdrop, making the setting soothingly picturesque. Thankfully, there is no hustle and bustle of tourists as only keen bird watchers and nature lovers come to Chhari Dhand.
[Show full text]
Observations from the Bhuj Earthquake of January 26, 2001
Observations From the Bhuj Earthquake of January 26, 2001 The devastating earthquake that struck the Kutch area of Gujarat, India on January 26, 2001, India’s Republic Day, was the most severe natural disaster to afflict India since her independence in 1947. The devastation was major in terms of lives lost, injuries suffered, people rendered homeless, as well as economics. The author visited the affected areas between February 12 and 16, 2001, as a member of a reconnaissance team that was organized by the Mid-America Earthquake Center based at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign and funded by the National Science Foundation. This report is based partly on his first-hand observations from that visit and partly on information gathered from several sources, including other visiting teams, news reports and technical literature. The author touches upon seismological/geotechnical aspects of the earthquake and discusses the performance of engineered buildings. Bridges, non- engineered buildings and other structures are excluded from the scope. S. K. Ghosh, Ph.D. Precast concrete construction, including non-building uses of precast President concrete, is discussed. In concluding the article, the building code S. K. Ghosh Associates, Inc. situation in India is briefly commented upon. Northbrook, Illinois he Bhuj earthquake of January 26, 2001 struck at 8:46 image of the geology and earthquake history of the New a.m. Indian Standard time and had a Richter magni- Madrid earthquakes of 1811 and 1812, the largest earth- Ttude of 7.7 (United States Geological Survey, revised quakes to occur in the U.S. continental 48 states, even from an initial estimate of 7.8).
[Show full text]
Final Report
No. JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY （JICA） GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT THE RECONSTRUCTION SUPPORT FOR THE GUJARAT-EARTHQUAKE DISASTER IN THE DEVASTATED AREAS IN INDIA FINAL REPORT OCTOBER, 2002 YAMASHITA SEKKEI INC. NIHON SEKKEI, INC. S S F J R ０２－１６１ Currency Equivalents Exchange rate effective as of June, 2001 Currency Unit = Rupee(Rs.) $ 1.00 = Rs．46.0 1Rs.=2.66 Japanese Yen,1 Crore = 10.000.000,1 Lakh = 100.000 Preface In response to a request from the Government of India, the Government of Japan decided to implement a project on the Reconstruction Support for the Gujarat-Earthquake Disaster in the Devastated Areas in India and entrusted the project to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a project team headed by Mr. Toshio Ito of Yamashita Sekkei Inc., the representing company of a consortium consists of Yamashita Sekkei Inc. and Nihon Sekkei, Inc., from June 6th, 2001 to May 29th, 2002 and from August 4th to August 18th, 2002. In addition, JICA selected an advisor, Mr. Osamu Yamada of the Institute of International Cooperation who examined the project from specialist and technical points of view. The team held discussions with the officials concerned of the Government of India and the Government of Gujarat and conducted a field survey and implemented quick reconstruction support project for the primary educational and healthcare sectors. After the commencement of the quick reconstruction support project the team conducted further studies and prepared this final report. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of the project and to the enhancement of friendly relationships between our two countries.
[Show full text]