DOCSLIB.ORG

DECISIONS MADE in the FRAME Teodora Heim

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DECISIONS MADE in the FRAME Teodora Heim 1 DECISIONS MADE IN THE FRAME Rational Choice, Institutional Norms and Public Ethos Against Corruption in Mauritius Teodora Heim Malmö University, Kultur och Samhälle Leadership and Public Organization: One-year master programme Masters’ Thesis, 15 HP VT2019 Tutor: Anders Edvik 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. The purpose of this study and the research questions ............................................................ 6 2.2. A short research overview ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3. Definitions .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.3.1. The definition of corruption in this study ........................................................................... 9 2.3.2. The definitions of the public officers ................................................................................ 10 2.4. Disposition of the report ....................................................................................................... 10 3. THEORETICAL DISCUSSIONS ............................................................................................. 10 3.1. Rational Choice + New Institutionalism = Rational Choice Institutionalism ..................... 11 3.2. The public ethos .................................................................................................................... 13 3.3. The theory about social construction of the institutional reality ......................................... 15 3.4. A model for the analysis ....................................................................................................... 17 4. METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................... 20 4.1. Selection of the departments ................................................................................................. 20 4.2. Selection of the interviewees ................................................................................................ 21 4.3. The documents ...................................................................................................................... 22 4.4. Delimitations ........................................................................................................................ 22 5. EMPIRICAL DATA ................................................................................................................... 23 5.1. A reasoning about the choice of Mauritius .......................................................................... 23 5.2. The society ............................................................................................................................ 25 5.3. The tools of the policy-makers .............................................................................................. 26 5.3.1. The Prevention of Corruption Act (POCA) ...................................................................... 26 5.3.2. The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) ............................................. 27 5.3.3. The Public Service Commission & Disciplined Forces Service Commission (the PSC) . 29 5.4. The public sphere ................................................................................................................. 29 5.5. The local governments and their organizational design ...................................................... 29 5.5.1. The workflow at the departments ..................................................................................... 30 5.5.2. The control system in the public administration .............................................................. 32 5.5.3. Observations from the interviews with the public officers ............................................... 33 6. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................... 37 6.1. The layers of the institutional frame ..................................................................................... 37 6.1.1. The society and its influence on the public sphere ........................................................... 38 6.1.2. The public sphere and the question if the public ethos is present .................................... 40 6.1.3. The public administration and its impact on the public servant’s choices ...................... 42 6.2. The individual’s rational calculation and choice ................................................................. 46 6.3. What is the role of the public ethos in the rational calculation? ......................................... 48 7. CLOSING DISCUSSIONS ......................................................................................................... 51 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 54 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. 57 APPENDIX 1 – The Interview Questions .......................................................................................... 58 3 FIGURES Figure 1: Lundquist's concept of the public ethos (1998:106) .............................................................. 14 Figure 2: The analysis model ................................................................................................................ 18 Figure 3: The analysis model highlighting the layer of the society ....................................................... 38 Figure 4: The analysis model highlighting the layer of the public sphere ............................................ 40 Figure 5: The analysis model highlighting the layer of the public administration ............................... 42 Figure 6: The analysis model showing the influence of the layers on the institutional frame .............. 44 Figure 7: The analysis model highlighting the public servant in the institutional frame ...................... 46 I would like to express my gratitude to the Mauritian team of Transparency International and especially to Mr. Rajen Bablee for the help and support I got when working in Mauritius and during the whole project. I would also like to thank all the officers at the municipalities in Port Louis and in Rivière du Rempart who took their time to meet me and shared their thoughts. A special thanks to the officers at the ICAC who helped me by sharing their expert knowledge. 4 1. ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to increase our knowledge about corruption issues. It examines the connection between the institutional frame and the individual’s choice made in his institutional role. The study is based on the theories of rational choice institutionalism and public ethos and the empirical data is analyzed from a social constructivist perspective. The addressed research questions are: - How is the institutional frame within the Mauritian public sphere being created, with special focus on shaping the norms saying that corruption is not accepted? - Does the institutional frame, and specifically the public ethos as a norm, influence the individual’s rational choice when deciding not to act corruptly? The empirical material has been collected in Mauritius, and the study uses the Mauritian local government as the example for the institution. According to the theory of rational choice institutionalism, public servants make rational choices, within the frames of the institution. Institutions are to be seen as a wider concept, where both the formal and informal institutions are included, such as norms, institutionalized actions and processes. The public ethos, a norm specifically connected to the democratic, public areas of the society, states that the public servant’s institutional role is different from a private person’s role. According to the theory about the social construction of the reality, the individual’s perception and understanding of his surroundings, the image of his reality, is shaped by the institutional frame and this frame delimits the options to choose among. The analysis is made with the help of a model which illustrates the layers of the institution, and the individual in the institutional frame, which thereby affects his rational calculations. The model is also used to illustrate the result of the analysis, by showing the factors that influence the norm-shaping process. The analysis and the conclusions of the study indicate that the creation of the institutional frame is strongly influenced from the society with an anti-corruption agenda, in form of legislation and government agencies, which have a resilient effect on the norm-shaping. Further, the presence of the public ethos norm is shown as an element of the institutional frame. The public servant, when making a rational calculation to decide to act or not to act 5 corruptly, is situated within this institutional frame. The conclusion of the thesis indicates that the individual’s rational choice is strongly affected by the institutional frame, showing that the public servant does take in consideration the public ethos norms in his institutional role. Even though economic reasons influence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consolidating Democratic Governance in the Sadc Region: Mauritius
    CONSOLIDATING DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN THE SADC REGION: MAURITIUS CONSOLIDATING DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE IN THE SADC REGION: MAURITIUS StraConsult, Mauritius Study Commissioned by EISA 2008 Published by EISA 14 Park Rd, Richmond Johannesburg South Africa P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 978-1-920095-85-7 © EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2008 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. _____________ ____________ EISA Research Report, No. 37 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 37 i PREFACE This research report is the culmination of a study undertaken by EISA focusing on the state of democratic governance in the Southern African region. The programme, implemented under the generic theme ‘Consolidating Democratic Governance in the SADC Region’, has evolved over a four-year period spanning 2003-2006. The research aims to investigate the state of democracy and governance in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region, posing a key question as to whether or not the region has undergone democratic transition and, if so, posing a related question as to whether or not the region is firmly set on the road to democratic consolidation. The four key variables for the assessment of the state of democratic governance in this study are: representation and accountability; citizen participation; local governance; and economic management and corporate governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritius Deep Dive 2020
    Mauritius - Threat Assessment - 2020 Page 1 of 33 Modern Slavery: The 2018 GSI Index: 47/51 Mauritius � African countries, with just 1,000 modern day slaves, and an incidence of under 1/1000 Section 1 - Executive Summary people and a “CCC” response. US Trafficking in Persons Tier 2 rating. Grey Lists: Mauritius is listed by FATF, & is proposed by the EU on their “Grey” list. Sanctions & Terrorism: There are no sanctions Mauritius is not listed by the US as a “Country against the country. Mauritius is a Tier 3 (lowest of Primary Concern” in respect of ML & FC. threat) PPI 2019 (Proliferation) Index Country with a “High” response score of 497/1,300. NRA: Mauritius has published its National Risk Mauritius has a “zero” impact (score 0/10) in Assessment in 2019. According to the NRA, Global Terrorism Index 2019. Mauritius is not the overall ML risk is Medium - High, based on included in US Country Reports on Terrorism. a threat level rated Medium - High and a ML vulnerability rating of Medium - High. The main Response & Resilience: FATF MER 4th round proceeds generating crimes were from drug results by ESAAMLG were 83/100 for technical trafficking, fraud, illegal bookmaking, high- compliance (40 Recommendations) & 12/100 value theft/robbery, tax crimes and corruption. for effectiveness (11 Outcomes). Mauritius The main threats externally affecting Mauritius scored 6.42/10 for resilience (High), ranked originated from fraud (including tax fraud) and 2/54 for Africa in the OC Index. proceeds from corruption. Indices: Mauritius scored 89/100 and was Organised Crime: According to the OC Index, rated “free” in the 2019 Freedom in the World Low Criminality - High Resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritius Country Report BTI 2018
    BTI 2018 Country Report Mauritius This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2018. It covers the period from February 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2018 Country Report — Mauritius. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2018 | Mauritius 3 Key Indicators Population M 1.3 HDI 0.781 GDP p.c., PPP $ 21088 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.1 HDI rank of 188 64 Gini Index 35.8 Life expectancy years 74.4 UN Education Index 0.758 Poverty3 % 3.2 Urban population % 39.5 Gender inequality2 0.380 Aid per capita $ 60.6 Sources (as of October 2017): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2017 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary Mauritius is not a transformation country in the classic sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauritius Final Long Form 2020
    Mauritius - Threat Assessment - 2020 Page 1 of 33 Modern Slavery: The 2018 GSI Index: 47/51 Mauritius � African countries, with just 1,000 modern day slaves, and an incidence of under 1/1000 Section 1 - Executive Summary people and a “CCC” response. US Trafficking in Persons Tier 2 rating. Grey Lists: Mauritius is listed by FATF, & is proposed by the EU on their “Grey” list. Sanctions & Terrorism: There are no sanctions Mauritius is not listed by the US as a “Country against the country. Mauritius is a Tier 3 (lowest of Primary Concern” in respect of ML & FC. threat) PPI 2019 (Proliferation) Index Country with a “High” response score of 497/1,300. NRA: Mauritius has published its National Risk Mauritius has a “zero” impact (score 0/10) in Assessment in 2019. According to the NRA, Global Terrorism Index 2019. Mauritius is not the overall ML risk is Medium - High, based on included in US Country Reports on Terrorism. a threat level rated Medium - High and a ML vulnerability rating of Medium - High. The main Response & Resilience: FATF MER 4th round proceeds generating crimes were from drug results by ESAAMLG were 83/100 for technical trafficking, fraud, illegal bookmaking, high- compliance (40 Recommendations) & 12/100 value theft/robbery, tax crimes and corruption. for effectiveness (11 Outcomes). Mauritius The main threats externally affecting Mauritius scored 6.42/10 for resilience (High), ranked originated from fraud (including tax fraud) and 2/54 for Africa in the OC Index. proceeds from corruption. Indices: Mauritius scored 89/100 and was Organised Crime: According to the OC Index, rated “free” in the 2019 Freedom in the World Low Criminality - High Resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • COLOMBO COMMENTARY on the JAKARTA STATEMENT on PRINCIPLES for ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES Cover Photo: ©Istock UNITED NATIONS OFFICE on DRUGS and CRIME Vienna
    COLOMBO COMMENTARY ON THE JAKARTA STATEMENT ON PRINCIPLES FOR ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES Cover photo: ©iStock UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna COLOMBO COMMENTARY ON THE JAKARTA STATEMENT ON PRINCIPLES FOR ANTI-CORRUPTION AGENCIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 Preface The United Nations Convention against Corruption is now almost universally ratified. The Convention requires States parties to ensure the existence of anti- corruption bodies with the necessary independence to prevent and combat corruption effectively. In 2012, anti-corruption agencies (ACAs) from around the world developed the Jakarta Statement on Principles for Anti-Corruption Agencies with support from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). The Jakarta Principles provided a useful set of benchmarks for the establishment of ACAs, but feedback over the years has suggested that they needed more elaboration. At the seventh session of the Conference of the States Parties to the Convention, in November 2017, States parties requested that further guidance be developed by UNODC to support the fulfilment of their international obligations. To provide such guidance to States parties, UNODC, in partnership with UNDP and the Sri Lankan Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption, held an expert group meeting on this topic in Colombo from 25 to 27 July 2018. The meeting brought together more than 30 international experts, including repre- sentatives of ACAs from around the world. At the meeting, experts discussed a draft of the Colombo Commentary on the Jakarta Statement on Principles for Anti- Corruption Agencies and shared their experiences and lessons learned in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Commission Against Corruption Mauritius
    INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION Newsletter Dec 2015 issue http://www.icac.mu fb.com/icacmauritius youtube.com/icacmu 2015: The Year in Figures Trends of ICAC’s KPIs indicate that the Commission has now reached a cruising speed in recording and investigating complaints of corruption or money laundering offences. The rough figure of 1,500 complaints per year echoes the degree of public confidence in the Commission in dispensing its mandate. However, the rate of complaints not falling within ICAC’s purview still remains high at almost 45%. Such complaints include either grievances from people who do not know which relevant authority to turn to or alleged malpractices in the private sector, among others. Among those set aside, some complaints have led to 31 Corruption Prevention Reviews (CPR) in 2015 alone. The 569 investigations opened so far in 2015 by ICAC suggested the implication of more than 2,000 suspects in possible breaches of sections of the PoCA or FIAMLA, of which, 63% are male and 15% female. The remaining 22% indicates that, although the Preliminary Investigation showed that an offence may have been committed, the progress of the inquiry has not allowed uncovering the identity of the suspect(s) yet… Page 2 Annual lecture: International Anti-Corruption Day 2015 In the context of the International Anti-Corruption Day 2015, ICAC hosted the first edition of what will now be an annual lecture. Three guest speakers, namely Pierre Dinan, economist, Gilbert Ahnee, media consultant and Rabin Bhujun, chief editor of ION News and executive member of the Media Trust, intervened on the theme “Economic, Social and Political impact of corruption”.
    [Show full text]
  • The UN Public Service Awards: Commonwealth Winners from 2012
    The UN Public Service Awards: Commonwealth winners from 2012 Introducing the Awards • South Australia’s Strategic Plan Community Engagement (Department of Premier and Cabinet, Australia). The United Nations Public Service Awards (UNPSA) recognises excellence in public service and rewards the • Metro Vancouver’s Public Outreach and Engagement creative achievements and contributions of public service Program (Metro Vancouver, Canada). institutions that have led to more effective and responsive Category 5 – Promoting Gender-Responsive Delivery of public administrations worldwide. The UNPSA are awarded Public Services – included the following winning initiatives: annually on 23 June, which was designated by the General Assembly as the United Nations Public Service Day to • ‘Protecting the Futures’, an initiative of the Small Projects ‘celebrate the value and virtue of service to the community’. Foundation Africa, that addresses school drop-out, puberty education and reproductive health among In 2011, the new UNPSA category ‘Preventing and adolescents (South Africa). Combating Corruption in Public Service’ (Category 1) was established by the United Nations Department of Economic • Isange One Stop Centre for victims of sexual and gender- and Social Affairs, through its Division for Public based violence (Rwandan National Police Force). Administration and Development Management • Integrating gender in the sector and addressing gender (DPADM/UNDESA), in partnership with the United Nations gaps (Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Kenya). Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). The United Nations For further details on these, the initiatives featured below, Convention against Corruption (2004) states that and other winners, see: www.unpan.org/unpsa. corruption hurts the poor disproportionately by diverting funds intended for development, undermining a government’s ability to provide basic services, and Independent Commission Against discouraging foreign aid and investment.
    [Show full text]
  • BTI 2020 Country Report Mauritius
    BTI 2020 Country Report Mauritius This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2020. It covers the period from February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of governance in 137 countries. More on the BTI at https://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2020 Country Report — Mauritius. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2020 | Mauritius 3 Key Indicators Population M 1.3 HDI 0.796 GDP p.c., PPP $ 23709 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 0.1 HDI rank of 189 66 Gini Index 38.5 Life expectancy years 74.5 UN Education Index 0.730 Poverty3 % 3.0 Urban population % 40.8 Gender inequality2 0.369 Aid per capita $ 9.2 Sources (as of December 2019): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2019 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2019. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary Mauritius is not a transformation country in the classic sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Agencies in Southern Africa
    The Impact of State-society relations on Anti- corruption Agencies in Southern Africa Author(s): Thato Toeba Source: Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal 5 (2019): 165–192 Published by: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy http://kmlpj.ukma.edu.ua/ The Impact of State-society relations on Anti- corruption Agencies in Southern Africa Thato Toeba LLD Candidate, University of the Western Cape, South Africa Abstract Corruption remains a fundamental and intricate issue in public administration to date. It is featured constantly as one of the foremost discontents that societies around the globe have with the administration of public service and the resulting socio-economic problems.1 While anti-corruption law is extensively adopted in Southern Africa, the implementation of law has encountered deficiencies and challenges in tackling, especially grand corruption. This paper focuses on Anti-Corruption Agencies (ACAs) and their efficacy in controlling corruption in Southern Africa. It argues that the inability of ACAs to arrest corruption in Southern Africa is embedded inter-alia in the precarious state-society relations in the region which perpetuate the ambiguity for corruption and impede the formation of a moral consensus on anti-corruption law. The state, which is regarded generally as a trustworthy custodian of social progress is viewed by most domestic constituents as apathetic to social welfare with its political ambitions as anti-ethical to those of citizens. The paper proposes the analytical framework of Context, Resonance & Relevance (CRR) to assess the compatibility of Anti-Corruption Agencies (ACAs) in Southern Africa with domestic institutional contexts. In this model, context assesses ACA framework in relation to the domestic political environment and the extent to which it allows ACAs the capacity to function efficiently amidst competing political priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption As an Obstacle to Development
    Chapter 4: Corruption as an Obstacle to Development 4 Corruption as an Obstacle to Development Brazilians protesting government corruption in March 2016. President Dilma Rousseff was impeached the following August. While democracy in Brazil has allowed citizens to mobilize against wrongdoing, corruption has proven to be deeply rooted in the political system and difficult to eradicate. Source: Wilson Dias/ Agência Brasil. 112 Handelman and Brynen_9781538116661.indb 112 19-11-2018 18:48:02 Corruption as an Obstacle to Development 113 ON AUGUST 31, 2016, THE BRAZILIAN SENATE, having found Presi- dent Dilma Rousseff guilty of breaking budget laws, voted to impeach her and remove her from office. The irony of her impeachment was that Rousseff’s illegal activities—using funds from government banks to cover budget deficits—had not stolen any funds for herself, while a large number of the senators who voted to remove her were knee-deep in self-enriching corruption. Numerous officials of the national oil and gas company, Petrobras, have been convicted of taking substantial bribes in return for awarding lucrative contracts to private companies. High-ranking government and Petrobras officials took millions in bribes and kickbacks. Among these was former president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who was convicted of receiving a beach-front apartment in exchange for helping an engineering company secure contracts with Petrobras. At the time of President Rousseff’s impeachment, 60 percent of the members of Brazilian Congress had been accused of criminal activities, including bribery and corruption, illegal deforestation, even kidnapping and murder.1 Indeed, the man who replaced Rousseff as president, Michel Temer (Rousseff’s vice president), for many years had been suspected of corruption when he was a congressman.
    [Show full text]
  • National Survey on Corruption 2014
    NATIONAL SURVEY ON CORRUPTION 2014 FINAL REPORT Presented by StraConsult February 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1 THE PURPOSE OF THE SURVEY ........................................................................................................... 6 OVERVIEW OF THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN MAURITIUS ...................................................... 9 Main Achievements of the ICAC ................................................................................................... 10 Statistical Highlights of ICAC’s Achievements concerning Corruption Investigation ...................... 15 Defining Corruption In Mauritius ................................................................................................. 18 THE 2014 SURVEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................ 22 Corruption is Perceived as only the Fourth National Problem in 2014 .......................................... 22 Personal Experience with Corruption ........................................................................................... 23 What determines People’s Perception of the State of Corruption ................................................ 25 Evolution of Corruption in the Mauritian Society ......................................................................... 26 Respondent's Perception and Understanding of Acts of Corruption ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption and Economic Crime
    Transparency International Anti-Corruption Helpdesk Answer Corruption and economic crime Author: Jorum Duri, [email protected] Reviewers: Maira Martini and Matthew Jenkins, Transparency International Date: 15 March 2021 Historically, corruption has been seen as an enabler of some types of economic crime and organised criminality, for example through payment of bribes to law enforcement agencies or undue influence in decision -making. However, modern forms of corruption – which the paper interprets as usually transnational in nature – are even more intertwined with economic crime. Both sets of crimes share similar drivers, rely on similar mechanisms to move and launder illicit funds, and deprive societies of much needed financial resources, threatening not only economic and social stability of other countries across the globe, but also the rule of law and democracy. Due to these common characteristics, certain instruments to combat corruption and economic crime could be productively brought into closer alignment. For instance, a public register on beneficial ownership may prevent the use of shell companies to launder proceeds from both corruption and economic crime. Moreover, international cooperation is required in the investigation and prosecution of both corruption and economic crime schemes, as well as for asset recovery purposes. Transparency in political funding may also ensure that political and electoral campaigns are not tainted by proceeds of corruption and economic crime, and could help prevent capture of state institutions. © 2021 Transparency International. All rights reserved. This document should not be considered as representative of the Commission or Transparency International’s official position. Neither the European Commission,Transparency International nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information.
    [Show full text]