Representative Plant List for the Sanctuary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Representative Plant List for the Sanctuary Representative Plant List for the Sanctuary Plant material shall be native plants or plants possessing visual characteristics similar to native. Following is a recommended list of acceptable plants for front and side-yard transitional areas and common areas around the homes according to category: A. Canopy/Shade Trees 1. Fraxinum pennsylvanica Green Ash 2. Fraxinum americana White Ash 3. Acer saccharum Sugar Maple 4. Acer rubrum Red Maple 5. Quercus macrocarpa Burr Oak 6. Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 7. Quercus ellipsoidalis Northern Pin Oak 8. Quercus rubra Red Oak 9. Quercus alba White Oak 10. Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 11. Gleditsia triacanthus Honeylocust 12. Celtis occidentalis Hackberry 13. Aesculus glabra Ohio Buckeye 14. Carya ovata Hickory 15. Catalpa speciosa Northern Catalpa B. Understory/Ornamental Trees 1. Acer campestre Hedge Maple 2. Amelanchier grandiflora Apple Serviceberry 3. Amelanchier canadensis Shadblow Serviceberry 4. Betula nigra River Birch 5. Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam 6. Crataegus crusgalli Cockspur Hawthorn 7. Malus sp. Crabapple 8. Cercis canadensis Redbud 9. Halesia carolina Carolina Silverbell 10. Ostrya virginiana Ironwood 11. Populus tremuloides Quaking Aspen Approved Plant List Page 1of 3 C. Shrubs 1. Aesculus parviflora Bottlebrush Buckeye 2. Amelanchier alnifolia Serviceberry (Shrub form) 3. Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry 4. Aronia melanocarpa Black Chokeberry 5. Buddlea davidii Butterfly Bush 6. Calycanthus floridus Common Sweetshrub 7. Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 8. Chaenomeles speciosa Flowering Quince 9. Clethra alnifolia Summersweet 10. Cornus racemosa Gray Dogwood 11. Cornus americana American Dogwood 12. Hamamelis vernalis Spring Witchhazel 13. Hamamelis virginiana Fall Witchhazel 14. Hydrangea quercifolia Oak-leafed Hydrangea 15. Ilex verticillata Winterberry Holly 16. Myrica pennsylvania Bayberry 17. Philadelphus virginalis Mockorange 18. Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark 19. Rhus aromatica Fragrant Sumac 20. Rhus copallina Shining Sumac 21. Symphoricapos albus Common Snowberry 22. Viburnum dentatum Arrowwood Viburnum 23. Viburnum lantana Mohican Viburnum 24. Viburnum lentago Nannyberry Viburnum 25. Viburnum prunifolium Blackhaw Viburnum 26. Viburnum rhytidophylloides ‘Allegheny’ Allegheny Viburnum 27. Weigela florida Weigela 28. Corylus americana American Hazelnut D. Perennials/Grasses 1. Amsonia hubrichtii Bluestar 2. Andropogon geradi Big Bluestem (Grass) 3. Andropogon scoparius Little Bluestem (Grass) 4. Aquilegia canadensis Columbine 5. Baptista australis Blue False Indigo 6. Chelone sp. Turtlehead 7. Cimicifuga racemosa Black Snakeroot Approved Plant List Page 2 of 3 8. Dodecatheon meadia Shooting Star 9. Deschampsia caespitosa Tufted Hair Grass (Grass) 10. Dryopetris marginalis Leatherwood Fern 11. Echinacea sp. Coneflower 12. Eupartorium sp. Hibiscus 13. Liatris sp. Gayfeather 14. Lobelia cardinalis Cardinal Flower 15. Monarda sp. Beebalm 16. Osmunda cinnamonea Cinnamon Fern 17. Panicum sp. Switch Grass(Grass) 18. Physostegia sp. Obedient Plant 19. Podophyllum peltatum May Apple 20. Polygonatum sp. Solomon’s Seal 21. Polystichum acrostichoides Christmas Fern 22. Pycnanthemum muticum Clustered Mountain Mint 23. Ratibida columnifera Long-headed Coneflower 24. Ratibida pinnata Yellow Coneflower 25. Rudbeckia sp. Black-Eyed Susan 26. Sporobolis heterolepsis Prairie Drop Seed (Grass) 27. Solidago sp. Goldenrod 28. Sorgastrum nutans Indian Grass (Grass) 29. Stokesia sp. Stoke’s Aster 30. Stylophorium diphyllum Wood Poppy 31. Tiarella sp. Foamflower 32. Tradescantia sp. Spiderwort 33. Veronicastrum sp. Black Root E. Groundcovers/Vines 1. Asarum canadense Wild Ginger 2. Ranunculus repens Buttercup 3. Parthenium integrifolium Wild Quinine 4. Parthenocissus inserta Thicket Creeper 5. Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia Creeper 6. Parthenocissus tricuspidata Boston Ivy 7. Thymus praecox Scarlet Thyme Approved Plant List Page 3 of 3.
Recommended publications
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 the Michigan Botanist 73
    2010 THE MICHIGAN BOTANIST 73 NOMENCLATURE OF THE THICKET CREEPER, PARTHENOCISSUS INSERTA (VITACEAE) James S. Pringle Royal Botanical Gardens P.O. Box 399 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3H8 ABSTRACT Parthenocissus inserta (A. Kern.) Fritsch, rather than P. vitacea (Knerr) Hitchc., is the correct name for the thicket creeper, a species related to the Virginia creeper, P. quinquefolia . KEY WORDS: Parthenocissus , Vitaceae Two species of Parthenocissus are native to eastern and central North Amer - ica. One of these, to which the common name Virginia creeper is more appropri - ately applied, is P. quinquefolia (L.) Planch. Its natural range extends from Mex - ico probably to southern Maine, southern Ontario, and southern Minnesota, although it has escaped from cultivation farther north. The other species, the nomenclature of which is discussed here, has a more northern and western range, from Pennsylvania, Texas, and California north to ca. 50°N in Ontario and Man - itoba. “False Virginia creeper,” “thicket creeper,” and “grape-woodbine” have been proposed as vernacular names for the northern species, but none of these names has become widely used. Because of their abundance and the size of the plants, these species are ecologically important, influencing succession and pro - viding cover and food for wildlife. They are widely cultivated as ornamental vines in North America and Europe, although they may sometimes become a problem, as when shrubs or specimen trees are engulfed. Until early in the twentieth century few botanists distinguished between these species, and the assumption that “the” Virginia creeper is Parthenocissus quin - quefolia continues to result in reports of P. quinquefolia from localities north of its true range.
    [Show full text]
  • Woody Vines Chart
    Woody Vines1 Cold Pests / Diseases & Flowers / Fruit / Additional Name2 Hardiness Soil / Climate Size4 Exposure Other Problems Foliage Features Zones3 Celastrus 2A-8B Adaptable; will grow Aphids, powdery mildew, H: 20-35’ Full sun to Flowers – greenish white, Native to eastern and scandens on just about any soil, and scale are most S: Variable partial shade; insignificant, in terminal central North America regardless of pH common, but are rarely fruits best in clusters (panicles); male including Minnesota; (acidic or alkaline), so serious. full sun. and female flowers typically has a single American long as it is well- produced on separate trunk; grows as a rambling Bittersweet Young stems are drained. sometimes eaten by plants (dioecious; or climbing vine and can individual plants male or reach heights up to 65 feet; Drought tolerant once rabbits. established. female; insect pollinated. the species is propagated Bloom Time – spring by seed and the cultivars Celastraceae (May/June). by stem cuttings. Bittersweet Family American bittersweet plants are generally dioecious (individual plants are male or female) and Summer Foliage – Bittersweet fruits are only female plants produce fruits; as a result, people that have male plants are disappointed by medium green; leaves poisonous to humans, but the lack of fruits; in addition, female plants planted in areas where male plants are uncommon alternate, toothed, are eaten by birds. or nonexistent also produce few if any fruits; several cultivated varieties that are known to be elliptical with narrow, Climbs by twining stems male (e.g., ‘Hercules’ and ‘Indian Brave’) or female (e.g., ‘Diana’ and ‘Indian Maid’) are pointed tips.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Vitaceae Based on Plastid Sequence Data
    PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF VITACEAE BASED ON PLASTID SEQUENCE DATA by PAUL NAUDE Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTAE in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: DR. M. VAN DER BANK December 2005 I declare that this dissertation has been composed by myself and the work contained within, unless otherwise stated, is my own Paul Naude (December 2005) TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Abstract iii Index of Figures iv Index of Tables vii Author Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements ix CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Vitaceae 1 1.2 Genera of Vitaceae 6 1.2.1 Vitis 6 1.2.2 Cayratia 7 1.2.3 Cissus 8 1.2.4 Cyphostemma 9 1.2.5 Clematocissus 9 1.2.6 Ampelopsis 10 1.2.7 Ampelocissus 11 1.2.8 Parthenocissus 11 1.2.9 Rhoicissus 12 1.2.10 Tetrastigma 13 1.3 The genus Leea 13 1.4 Previous taxonomic studies on Vitaceae 14 1.5 Main objectives 18 CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 21 2.1 DNA extraction and purification 21 2.2 Primer trail 21 2.3 PCR amplification 21 2.4 Cycle sequencing 22 2.5 Sequence alignment 22 2.6 Sequencing analysis 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 32 3.1 Results from primer trail 32 3.2 Statistical results 32 3.3 Plastid region results 34 3.3.1 rpL 16 34 3.3.2 accD-psa1 34 3.3.3 rbcL 34 3.3.4 trnL-F 34 3.3.5 Combined data 34 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 42 4.1 Molecular evolution 42 4.2 Morphological characters 42 4.3 Previous taxonomic studies 45 4.4 Conclusions 46 CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES 48 APPENDIX STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DATA 59 ii ABSTRACT Five plastid regions as source for phylogenetic information were used to investigate the relationships among ten genera of Vitaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants That Weren't Tough Enough
    University of Alaska Fairbanks School of Natural Resources and Extension Georgeson Botanical Notes No. 82 (1996) - Revised 2014 Plants that Weren’t Tough Enough by Pat Holloway and Pat Wagner Any researcher working in the Far North is well aware of the beneficial attributes of snow as an insulating blanket for both plants and small animals. We learned in graphic detail just how important snow is in Alaska this past winter. The total accumu- lation of snow through January 1996 was only 6 inches (15.2 cm). During that time the minimum winter air temperature at the Garden reached -43oF (-42oC) in December and -48oF (-44oC) in January. Thirty-three percent of the experimental plants in the Garden were killed by this low snowfall. Damage could have been caused by extreme desiccation, frost heaving or an inability to tolerate low temperature extremes. Whatever the cause, the plants are dead, and we will have lots of room next season for new experiments. Some of the plants were heartbreaking losses such as the lilies, tulips, columbines and grape hyacinths. Some grape hyacinths finally emerged in mid summer, but it was quite obvious the damage was severe. Other plants such as tansy, we won’t miss at all because of its invasive nature. Nearly all of the plants that were growing well prior to last winter will be tested again at a later date. One thing is for certain, all the plants listed below will now come with a warning - needs snow cover to survive! Even more remarkable than this list is the one showing the plants that endured this severe winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Invasion Threat of the Liana Celastrus Orbiculatus
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal NeoBiota 56: 1–25 (2020)Emerging invasion threat of the liana Celastrus orbiculatus in Europe 1 doi: 10.3897/neobiota.56.34261 RESEARCH ARTICLE NeoBiota http://neobiota.pensoft.net Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions Emerging invasion threat of the liana Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae) in Europe Zigmantas Gudžinskas1, Lukas Petrulaitis1, Egidijus Žalneravičius1 1 Nature Research Centre, Institute of Botany, Žaliųjų Ežerų Str. 49, Vilnius LT-12200, Lithuania Corresponding author: Zigmantas Gudžinskas ([email protected]) Academic editor: Franz Essl | Received 4 March 2019 | Accepted 12 March 2020 | Published 10 April 2020 Citation: Gudžinskas Z, Petrulaitis L, Žalneravičius E (2020) Emerging invasion threat of the liana Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae) in Europe. NeoBiota 56: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.56.34261 Abstract The woody vine Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae), Oriental bittersweet, is an alien species that recently has been found to be spreading in Europe. Many aspects of its biology and ecology are still obscure. This study evaluates the distribution and habitats, as well as size and age of stands of C. orbiculatus in Lithuania. We investigated whether meteorological factors affect radial stem increments and determined seedling recruit- ment in order to judge the plant’s potential for further spread in Europe. We studied the flower gender of C. orbiculatus in four populations in Lithuania and found that all sampled individuals were monoecious, although with dominant either functionally female or male flowers. Dendrochronological methods enabled us to reveal the approximate time of the first establishment of populations of C. orbiculatus in Lithuania.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Changes of Adhesive Discs During Attachment of Boston Ivy
    pISSN 2287-5123·eISSN 2287-4445 http://dx.doi.org/10.9729/AM.2014.44.4.111 Structural Changes of Adhesive Discs during Attachment of Boston Ivy InSun Kim* Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Keimyung University, Daegu 704-701, Korea This study investigates the developmental pattern of adhesive discs (ADs) to highlight the ontogeny and structural changes that occur during the growth of Boston ivy. Initiation to postmortem features of ADs were examined through light and scanning electron microscopy. The study also reveals a new finding of the dislocation of peripheral tissues of adaxial origin. Four phases of attachment are suggested with regards to its climbing behavior: 1) pre-attachment, 2) upon attachment, 3) after attachment, and 4) final attachment. During initiation, several ADs originate from tendril primordia without epidermal differentiation. However, different growth rates in the epidermis results in completely different ADs. ADs were discerned by size, shape, and color during expansion, but cells in the adaxial surface remained alive longer than the other side. Upon contact, the ADs demonstrate simultaneous growth and deterioration, but once attachment is *Correspondence to: established the latter process subdues to final stages. Epidermal transformation, adhesive Kim IS, secretion, cellular disruption, and mechanical stress were essential for the self-clinging Tel: +82-53-580-5305 nature of Boston ivy. The post-attachment sequence is also believed to be critical in Fax: +82-53-580-5305 achieving maximum mechanical strength to provide extensive support. The developmental E-mail: [email protected] process of ADs is prompted by tactile stimulation but in a highly organized and systematic manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicodendron Risk Assessment
    Common Name Latin Name MN NWAC Risk Porcelain Berry, Ampelopsis brevipedunculata (Maxim.) Trautv. Assessment Worksheet (04-2011) Porcelain Ampelopsis, Porcelain- (synonyms: Ampelopsis glandulosa & var. vine, Amur Peppervine, Wild Grape brevipedunculata, var. glandulosa, and var. heterophylla, Ampelopsis sinica, and Vitis heterophylla) Reviewer Affiliation/Organization Date (mm/dd/yyyy) James Calkins Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 07/21/2014 Porcelain berry (Ampelopsis brevipedunculata) is a vigorous, deciduous, woody vine in the grape family (Vitaceae). Plants have variable, occasionally simple, cordate (heart-shaped), but most often maple/grape-like, 3- to 5-lobed, alternately arranged, toothed leaves (shiny on undersides with minute hairs along the veins). Plants have a fairly loose, rambling habit, are relatively fast growing, and climb by branched tendrils (modified leaves) attached opposite the leaves; plants can reach a height of 10-25 feet or more. Native to temperate Asia (China, Korea, Japan, and eastern Russia), porcelain berry was introduced as a landscape plant in 1870 and has since escaped cultivation and become naturalized in parts of the eastern United States. The flowers are perfect and borne in loose cymes from July until frost (September) in Minnesota and are greenish in color and small and insignificant; plants flower on new growth and are insect pollinated. The fruit is a shiny, 1- to 4-seeded berry that matures in September and October in Minnesota. As they mature, the fruits in a single cluster may be variously pale green to creamy yellow, lilac-pink, lavender, sky blue, purple and indigo-blue; mature fruits are various shades of blue and purple. The distinctively-colored fruits develop a speckled to mottled pattern that resembles the crackled appearance of porcelain which gives rise to the common name porcelain berry.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedona Plant List
    Sedona Plant List Botanical Name Common Name Botanical Name Common Name Perennials/Annuals Achillea millefolium Western Yarrow Machaeranthera canescens Purple Aster Agastache cana Hummingbird Mint Mimulus cardinalis Crimson Monkey Flower Agastache rupestris Licorice Mint Mimulus guttatus Yellow Monkey Flower Antennaria parvifolia Small Leaf Pussytoes Mirabilis multiflora Desert Four O’Clock Antennaria rosulata Kaibab Pussytoes Monarda menthaefolia Beebalm Aquilegia chrysantha Golden Columbine Oenothera caespitosa Tufted Evening Primrose Artemesia frigida Fringed Sage Oenothera hookeri Hookers Evening Primrose Oenothera pallida Pale Evening Primrose Asclepias tuberosa Butterflyweed Penstemon ambiguus Bush Penstemon Aster comutatus White Aster Penstemon barbatus Scarlet Bugler Baileya multiradiata Desert Marigold Penstemon eatonii Firecracker Penstemon Berlandieria lyrata Chocolate Flower Penstemon linarioides Mat Penstemon Penstemon palmeri Palmer’s Penstemon Calylophus hartwegii Hartweg Evening Penstemon pseudospectabilis Arizona Penstemon Primrose Castilleja integra Paintbrush Penstemon rostriflorus Bridge Penstemon Datura meteloides Sacred Datura Penstemon strictus Rocky Mt Penstemon Erigeron divergens Fleabane Psilostrophe tagetina Paper Flower Eschscholtzia californica California Poppy Ratibida columnaris Prairie Coneflower Sphaeralcea grossulariaefolia Gooseberry Globemallow Gaillardia pinnatifida Adobe Blanketflower Psilostrophe tagetina Paper Flower Geranium caespitosum Purple Crainsbill Ratibida columnaris red Mexican Hat Heterotheca
    [Show full text]
  • OTTY LAKE 2012 BIOBLITZ DATA July 17, 18 2012 Sorted by Scientific Name
    OTTY LAKE 2012 BIOBLITZ DATA July 17, 18 2012 Sorted by Scientific Name Category Group Scientific Name Common Name AMPHIBIANS Ambystoma laterale Blue-spotted Salamander Hyla versicolor Gray Treefrog Notophthalmus viridescens viridescens Red-spotted Newt Plethodon cinereus Eastern Red-backed Salamander Pseudacris crucifer Spring Peeper Rana catesbeiana American Bullfrog Rana clamitans Green Frog Rana septentrionalis Mink Frog Rana sylvatica Wood Frog BIRDS Agelaius phoeniceus Red-winged Blackbird Anas platyrhynchos Mallard Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron Bombycilla cedrorum Cedar Waxwing Bonasa umbellus Ruffed Grouse Branta canadensis Canada Goose Buteo lineatus Red-shouldered Hawk Caprimulgus vociferus Whip-poor-will Carduelis tristis American Goldfinch Cathartes aura Turkey Vulture Catharus fuscescens Veery Catharus guttatus Hermit Thrush Certhia americana Brown Creeper Chordeiles minor Common Nighthawk Colaptes auratus Northern Flicker Contopus virens Eastern Wood-pewee Corvus brachyrhynchos American Crow 1 Cyanocitta cristata Blue Jay Dendroica coronata Yellow-rumped Warbler Dendroica pensylvanica Chestnut-sided Warbler Dendroica petechia Yellow Warbler Dendroica pinus Pine Warbler Dumetella carolinensis Gray Catbird Gavia immer Common Loon Geothlypis trichas Common Yellowthroat Hirundo rustica Barn Swallow Larus delawarensis Ring-billed Gull Lophodytes cucullatus Hooded Merganser Melospiza georgiana Swamp Sparrow Melospiza melodia Song Sparrow Mniotilta varia Black-and-white Warbler Myiarchus crinitus Great Crested Flycatcher Pandion
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants
    Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants June 1, 2011 By Scott Mincemoyer Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT This checklist of Montana vascular plants is organized by Division, Class and Family. Species are listed alphabetically within this hierarchy. Synonyms, if any, are listed below each species and are slightly indented from the main species list. The list is generally composed of species which have been documented in the state and are vouchered by a specimen collection deposited at a recognized herbaria. Additionally, some species are included on the list based on their presence in the state being reported in published and unpublished botanical literature or through data submitted to MTNHP. The checklist is made possible by the contributions of numerous botanists, natural resource professionals and plant enthusiasts throughout Montana’s history. Recent work by Peter Lesica on a revised Flora of Montana (Lesica 2011) has been invaluable for compiling this checklist as has Lavin and Seibert’s “Grasses of Montana” (2011). Additionally, published volumes of the Flora of North America (FNA 1993+) have also proved very beneficial during this process. The taxonomy and nomenclature used in this checklist relies heavily on these previously mentioned resources, but does not strictly follow anyone of them. The Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants can be viewed or downloaded from the Montana Natural Heritage Program’s website at: http://mtnhp.org/plants/default.asp This publication will be updated periodically with more frequent revisions anticipated initially due to the need for further review of the taxonomy and nomenclature of particular taxonomic groups (e.g. Arabis s.l ., Crataegus , Physaria ) and the need to clarify the presence or absence in the state of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitaceae) Based on Three Chloroplast Markers1
    American Journal of Botany 93(2): 278–287. 2006. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF THE GRAPE FAMILY (VITACEAE) BASED ON THREE CHLOROPLAST MARKERS1 AKIKO SOEJIMA2 AND JUN WEN3,4 2Department of Biological Science, School of Science, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan; 3Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, MRC166, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 USA; and Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanxinchun 20, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, P. R. China Seventy-nine species representing 12 genera of Vitaceae were sequenced for the trnL-F spacer, 37 of which were subsequently sequenced for the atpB-rbcL spacer and the rps16 intron. Phylogenetic analysis of the combined data provided a fairly robust phylogeny for Vitaceae. Cayratia, Tetrastigma, and Cyphostemma form a clade. Cyphostemma and Tetrastigma are each monophyletic, and Cayratia may be paraphyletic. Ampelopsis is paraphyletic with the African Rhoicissus and the South American Cissus striata nested within it. The pinnately leaved Ampelopsis form a subclade, and the simple and palmately leaved Ameplopsis constitutes another with both subclades containing Asian and American species. Species of Cissus from Asia and Central America are monophyletic, but the South American C. striata does not group with other Cissus species. The Asian endemic Nothocissus and Pterisanthes form a clade with Asian Ampelocissus, and A. javalensis from Central America is sister to this clade. Vitis is monophyletic and forms a larger clade with Ampelocissus, Pterisanthes, and Nothocissus. The eastern Asian and North American disjunct Parthenocissus forms a clade with Yua austro-orientalis, a species of a small newly recognized genus from China to eastern Himalaya.
    [Show full text]