Resolving Dilemmas Arising During Design and Implementation of Digital Repository of Heterogenic Scientific Resources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resolving Dilemmas Arising During Design and Implementation of Digital Repository of Heterogenic Scientific Resources applied sciences Article Resolving Dilemmas Arising during Design and Implementation of Digital Repository of Heterogenic Scientific Resources Tomasz Kubik 1,* and Agnieszka Kwiecie ´n 2 1 Faculty of Electronics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeze˙ Wyspia´nskiego27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland 2 Wrocław Centre for Networking and Supercomputing, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeze˙ Wyspia´nskiego27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The creation of digital repositories for archiving and disseminating scientific resources faces many challenges. These challenges relate not only to the modelling of the processes of preparing, depositing, sharing, maintaining, and curating resources. They also face the feasibility of the adopted assumptions and final implementation. Such kind of issues become particularly important in the case of processing of resources containing multimedia. The critical factor then becomes a properly designed architecture that supports efficient data processing and universal data presentation. This article aims to answer questions that may arise when approaching various designing and implementation dilemmas, such as how to handle processes in a digital repository, how to use cloud solutions in its construction, how to work with user interfaces, and how to process collected multimedia. The presented study explores their practical context based on the experiences gained during the AZON platform’s implementation. This platform stores tens of thousands of scientific resources: books, articles, magazines, teaching materials, presentations, photos, 3D scans, audio and video files, databases, and many more. It serves as a running example for all presented proposals. Keywords: digital repository; multimedia processing; cloud architecture; scientific resources Citation: Kubik, T.; Kwiecie´n,A. Resolving Dilemmas Arising during 1. Introduction Design and Implementation of Digital Repository of Heterogenic Scientific Digital repositories (DRs), in brief, are IT systems offering tools for publishing, storing, Resources. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 215. retrieving, and sharing data and information by collecting data records along with related https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010215 metadata. They are exciting subjects for conducting a variety of research. Its broad spectrum covers database management, including inference with incomplete/inconsistent Received: 25 November 2020 datasets, knowledge modeling and discovery, querying, security issues handling, etc., as Accepted: 23 December 2020 described in [1]. In particular, the research might cover models used to index, search and Published: 28 December 2020 recommend multimedia data as presented in [2,3]. From the users’ point of view, digital repositories should offer: (i) a user-friendly Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- graphical interface enabling: easy search for records, classification and sorting of search tral with regard to jurisdictional claims results, content preview, retrieval of items; (ii) the ability to process data at different in published maps and institutional stages of the supported processes, for example, to automatically generate metadata when affiliations. publishing records; (iii) multi-level access control of individual metadata fields to meet the needs of different audiences; (iv) the ability to cooperate with other repositories; (v) handling and providing long-term support for different types of data files; etc. Copyright: © 2020 by the authors. Li- For the designers, essential parameters of the repositories are: infrastructure and censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This hardware requirements; modularity, extensibility, and scalability of the architecture; a stack article is an open access article distributed of technologies used; security mechanisms implemented; supported protocols and offered under the terms and conditions of the APIs (Application Program Interfaces) allowing for adding new functions and integration Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) with other systems; etc. license (https://creativecommons.org/ The various software solution examination in terms of their potential use was only licenses/by/4.0/). a part of the analyses carried out during the AZON (Atlas of Open Scientific Resources) Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010215 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/applsci Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 215 2 of 19 platform’s construction. This platform enables the collection, processing, and sharing of open science resources in digital form. It was built in the scope of the project Akty- wna Platforma Informacyjna e-scienceplus.pl, POPC.02.03.01-00-0010/16, aimed at increasing accessibility, improving the quality and reuse facilitating of scientific resources of such institutions as Wrocław University of Science and Technology, University School of Physical Education in Wrocław, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław Medical University and Systems Research Institute Polish Academy of Sciences. Thus, the AZON platform can be compared, in some sense, to the data management systems like Dryad (https://datadryad.org/stash), Open Science Framework (https://osf.io), CKAN (https://ckan.org), and Dataverse (https://dataverse.org) addressed to the community of users, enabling collaboration, resources sharing and discovery. The digital archives, like National Archives Catalog (https://catalog.archives.gov), Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe (https://www.nac.gov.pl), or Europeana (https://www.europeana.eu/en) are also compa- rable. In the beginning, it was necessary to design an appropriate architecture for the AZON platform, especially that it was supposed to support the publication of 32,792 documents (assuming, for simplicity, that one document = one data record) that would require the dis- semination of 124 TB of data. Moreover, according to the assumptions, increasing scientific resources’ availability should be automated, with batch processing of data performed in the computing centre. The platform was supposed to support data standardization, records annotation, voice transcription, search, linking, keywords definition, and text analysis. The designed domain metadata models, dictionaries, and thesauri should support the information dissemination and search. The plan was to design separate subsystems for handling such tasks as data collecting, processing, long-term preservation, presentation, and sharing due to the possibility of concepts separation. Many of these tasks could be addressed by the software providing the digital repository functionality. However, the existing solutions did not meet the expecta- tions. For example, the problem of effective multimedia processing, including automatic conversion, generation of transcripts and preparation for streaming, remained untouched, and there was no support for consistent presentation of heterogeneous resources. Therefore, the design of a new platform started from scratch, and this was a challenge. During the work, many dilemmas have been raised and solved, both on the side of modeling and implementation. This article focuses on presenting some of them, empha- sizing those related to the processes running within the AZON platform, its architecture, and problems associated with the design of interfaces ensuring sufficient deposit and presentation of scientific resources, including resources with multimedia attached. 2. Literature Review The logical architecture of many digital repositories consists of several parts. Usually, there is a part responsible for the business logic (platform or engine). Another one is responsible for data preservation (file systems or databases). The last one is used to interact with users within the web browser window (access application). These parts are loosely coupled and often run as independent web services. The communication between them goes through the endpoints with well-defined application programming interfaces. In Table1, some of the existing implementations of digital repositories are listed, including platform only and fully featured repositories. All are open-source software- based. A more detailed comparison of selected repositories is given in [4] (a bit outdated, but still valid) while custom implementations are in the focus of [5,6]. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 215 3 of 19 Table 1. Selected digital repositories delivered as software packages. Project Name and Its Homepage Supported Metadata Standards Software Type and Search Features Fedora Commons, MODS, Dublin Core, QDC out of the box, platform only, with API, with native https://duraspace.org/fedora/ arbitrary metadata sets Linked Data support Islandora, MODS, Dublin Core, PREMIS, repository, built on Fedora Commons, https://islandora.ca MARCXML uses Apache Solr Samvera (previously Hydra), MODS, DC, DC11, EDM, FOAF, custom bespoke solution, build on Fedora https://samvera.org metadata set Commons, uses Apache Solr DSpace, Dublin Core, arbitrary metadata sets (but repository, uses Apache Solr http://duraspace.org/dspace/ flat) Archivematica, METS, PREMIS, Dublin Core, Library of repository, based on ISO-OAIS functional https://www.archivematica.org/en/ Congress BagIt model, uses Elastic Search AtoM, EAD, Dublin Core XML, MODS XML, repository, uses Elastic Search https://www.accesstomemory.org/en/ EAC, SKOS Invenio, MARC repository, uses Elastic Search https://invenio-software.org VIVO, VIVO ontology, arbitrary metadata sets repository, uses Apache Solr https://duraspace.org/vivo/ (custom ontologies)
Recommended publications
  • Digital Technologies for Documenting and Preserving Cultural Heritage
    and Digital Humanities Collection Development, Cultural Heritage, Cultural Heritage, Collection Development, DIGITAL TECHNIQUES FOR DOCUMENTING AND PRESERVING CULTURAL HERITAGE Edited by ANNA BENTKOWSKA-KAFEL and LINDSAY MacDONALD COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT, CULTURAL HERITAGE, AND DIGITAL HUMANITIES This exciting series publishes both monographs and edited thematic collections in the broad areas of cultural heritage, digital humanities, collecting and collections, public history and allied areas of applied humanities. In the spirit of our mission to take a stand for the humanities, this series illustrates humanities research keeping pace with technological innovation, globalization, and democratization. We value a variety of established, new, and diverse voices and topics in humanities research and this series provides a platform for publishing the results of cutting- Theedge aim projects is to illustrate within these the impact fields. of humanities research and in particular the cultural sector, including archives, libraries and museums, media and thereflect arts, the cultural exciting memory new networks and heritage developing institutions, between festivals researchers and tourism, and and public history. DIGITAL TECHNIQUES FOR DOCUMENTING AND PRESERVING CULTURAL HERITAGE Edited by ANNA BENTKOWSKA-KAFEL and LINDSAY MacDONALD Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress © 2017, Arc Humanities Press, Kalamazoo and Bradford This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence. Permission to use brief excerpts from this work in scholarly and educational works is hereby The authors assert their moral right to be identified as the authors of their part of this work. granted provided that the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Preservation Functionality in Canadian Repositories
    08 Fall • OPEN REPOSITORIES REPORT SERIES Digital Preservation Functionality in Canadian Repositories by Tomasz Neugebauer, Pierre Lasou, Andrea Kosavic, and Tim Walsh (on behalf of the CARL Open Repositories Working Group’s Task Group on Next Generation Repositories) DECEMBER 2019 Digital Preservation Functionality in Canadian Repositories was written by members of the CARL Open Repositories Working Group’s Task Group on Next Generation Repositories and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Summary of Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 3 Digital Preservation Requirements ................................................................................................... 3 Bit preservation .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Preservation Metadata ............................................................................................................................ 4 AIP Export .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Open Repository Systems in Canada ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NLG-L Recipient, LG-72-18-0204
    LG-72-18-0204-18 Fedora Commons, Inc. Abstract DuraSpace seeks a National Digital Platform Planning Grant for $49,279 to investigate barriers upgrading hundreds of U.S.-based libraries and archives running unsupported versions of Fedora. Running unsupported software puts at risk the stability, security, and functionality of the content and services they support. There are approximately 240 libraries and archives in the United States identified as using ​ unsupported versions of Fedora making them target beneficiaries of the deliverables of this project. They include R1, R2, and R3 universities, liberal arts colleges, and not-for-profit special libraries hosted by historical societies and small research institutes. DuraSpace’s proposed one-year planning project, Designing a Migration Path: Assessing ​ Barriers Upgrading to Fedora 4.x, will include consultation with an advisory board of ​ stakeholders, conducting an environmental scan of relevant community initiatives, and gathering primary research data to determine what tools and supports are needed for the upgrade path. We can identify the following as deliverables for this proposed planning project: ● Describing a collection of the most common Fedora 3.x - Fedora 4.x upgrade user stories ● Creating an inventory of tools, documentation, and other resources for the upgrade path ● Providing the Islandora, Samvera, and Fedora community governance bodies feedback on ​ ​ the challenges and advantages of working within their communities ● Developing migration path recommendations and prioritizing
    [Show full text]
  • Where Digital Archaeology Might Go Next 167
    The Open Digital Archaeology Textbook Shawn Graham, Neha Gupta, Jolene Smith, Andreas Angourakis, Andrew Reinhard, Kate Ellenberger, Zack Batist, Joel Rivard, Ben Marwick, Michael Carter, Beth Compton, Rob Blades, Cristina Wood, & Gary Nobles 2020-07-11 2 Contents notice 5 About the Authors 7 Getting Started 11 Instructors: How to use this text ............................................ 11 Students: How to use this text ............................................. 11 How to contribute changes, or make your own version ................................. 12 How to access and use the computational environment ................................ 13 Colophon ....................................................... 13 Welcome! 15 1 Going Digital 17 1.1 So what is Digital Archaeology? ......................................... 19 1.2 Project Management Basics ........................................... 24 1.3 Github & Version Control ............................................. 26 1.4 Open Notebook Research & Scholarly Communication .............................. 31 1.5 Failing Productively ............................................... 37 1.6 The Ethics of Big Data in Archaeology ...................................... 39 1.7 Effective Collaboration .............................................. 40 2 Making Data Useful 45 2.1 Proper Prior Planning .............................................. 45 2.2 Designing Data Collection and Curation ..................................... 54 2.3 Cleaning Data .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Omeka and the Nlm Digital Repository: a New Way of Creating Hmd-Curated Websites
    NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE OMEKA AND THE NLM DIGITAL REPOSITORY: A NEW WAY OF CREATING HMD-CURATED WEBSITES January-August 2011 Julie Adamo, Associate Fellow, 2010-2011 Project leaders: Jennifer Marill (Chief, Technical Services Division), Jeff Reznick (Deputy Chief, History of Medicine Division) Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Motivations ............................................................................................................................................... 5 HMD Ad Hoc Committee for Online Programs ....................................................................................... 5 R2 Consulting Report ............................................................................................................................... 5 Curated Websites ...................................................................................................................................... 6 What is Omeka? ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Why focus on Omeka? .............................................................................................................................. 7 Procedures ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From OASIS to Samvera: Three Decades of Online Access to OSU's
    OLA Quarterly Volume 24 Number 4 Digital Repositories and Data Harvests 8-1-2019 From OASIS to Samvera: Three Decades of Online Access to OSU’s Archives and Special Collections Lawrence A. Landis Oregon State University Recommended Citation Landis, L. A. (2019). From OASIS to Samvera: Three Decades of Online Access to OSU’s Archives and Special Collections. OLA Quarterly, 24(4), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.7710/1093-7374.1958 © 2019 by the author(s). OLA Quarterly is an official publication of the egonOr Library Association | ISSN 1093-7374 From OASIS to Samvera: Three Decades of Online Access to OSU’s Archives and Special Collections by Lawrence A. Landis LARRY has been director Director, Special Collections of the OSU Libraries and and Archives Research Center, Oregon State University Press’s Special Collections Libraries and Press and Archives Research [email protected] Center since 2011. He has worked as an archivist at OSU since 1991, and has been active with creating digital collections and online access to collections. Oregon State University has been a leader in making unique resources accessible via the Internet. Individually or with collaborative partners, OSU made collection information, exhibits and en- tire collections available online. This timeline article presents OSU’s major projects and develop- ments to promote online accessibility over the past thirty years. Background For several decades, Oregon State University has been at the forefront of making library and archives resources available online. Many of these efforts have been collaborative in nature; OSU has worked with a broad range of library and archives/special collections partners in Oregon and the Northwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Alternatives to Digital Commons
    Open Source Alternatives to Digital Commons David Brian Holt, UC Davis Brian Huffman, University of Hawaii Erik Beck, Sacramento State University Leah Prescott, Georgetown University Kathy McCarthy, TIND.io http://bit.ly/daviscow Why is this via WebEx? California Travel Ban Erik and David are both employed by the State of California. South Carolina is on the travel ban list due to its active enabling of discrimination against its LGBT residents. Campaign for Southern Equality Consider offsetting your travel to South Carolina by making a contribution to the Campaign for Southern Equality https://southernequality.org “Life Cycle” of Legal Scholarly Publishing Research to Publication 1. Conduct research and create working draft a. Upload to SSRN (or LawArXiv!!) 2. Submit to journals a. Via Expresso or Scholastica 3. Publication 4. Deposit in IR Credit to University of Wyoming Current Landscape Digital Commons Market Share Of the 206 ABA-accredited law schools, 82 of them are currently using Digital Commons as their institutional repository Why Digital Commons? 1. Hosted solution 2. Provides platform for journal publishing and symposia 3. Sophisticated search engine optimization Why not Digital Commons? 1. Now owned by Elsevier!! a. History of opposing open-access scholarship 2. One vendor controls entire “eco-system” of legal scholarly publishing: a. Expresso b. SSRN c. Digital Commons Alternatives Major Open-Source IR Projects 1. Dspace 2. Tind (Invenio) 3. Samvera a. Islandora b. Hyku 4. EPrints 5. Omeka? (not really) What’s missing? 1. Journal hosting a. Open Journal Systems (OJS) may be viable alternative 2. Symposia hosting a. Ubiquity Press working on a Hyku-based IR for symposia along with OJS-based journal hosting platform Tech Specs How it’s made 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibiting Library Collections Online: Omeka in Context Juliet L. Hardesty
    Exhibiting library collections online: Omeka in context Juliet L. Hardesty Metadata Analyst Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana [email protected] © 2014 Juliet L. Hardesty This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Introduction For Indiana University (IU) Libraries, and for most libraries out there, our collections comprise more than just books. We have more than just a series of things on a shelf with descriptions that can be searched. We have items that are part of a larger donated set; we have original pieces that tell a story or are part of a story in history; we have art objects; we have sound and moving pictures; we have born digital items; we represent and reflect our community. All of these items are in the library (or gallery, archive, or museum) to be preserved, viewed, and researched. Many times, however, those goals are conflicting, particularly for physical items. Digital library efforts have pursued digitizing and providing some kind of online access to as much content as possible. These efforts can result in specialized web sites focused on a particular collection using functionality so specialized to the collection or metadata as to be unusable anywhere else. In the opposite direction, online access can come in the form of web sites focused solely on a format resulting in the loss of context and significance. How can we reveal the significance and context of individual items and provide access to them in a way that makes them more collectively available? Online exhibition tools allow libraries (along with galleries, archives, and museums) the opportunity to provide access to items that are fragile, popular, or both and that have a story to be shared, regardless of the digital management process.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Application for the Digital Methods for Military History
    OFFICE OF DIGITAL HUMANITIES Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Program guidelines also change and the samples may not match exactly what is now required. Please use the current Notice of Funding Opportunity instructions to prepare your application. Prospective applicants to the Institutes for Advanced Topics in the Digital Humanities program should consult the current Notice of Funding Opportunity at https://www.neh.gov/grants/odh/institutes-advanced-topics-in-the-digital- humanities for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Office of Digital Humanities staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Digital Methods for Military History Institution: George Mason University Project Director: Abigail Mullen Grant Program: Institutes for Advanced Topics in the Digital Humanities 1 Digital Methods for Military History: An Institute for Advanced Topics in the Digital Humanities Proposal submitted by the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media List of Participants • Abigail Mullen (project director), George Mason University • Christopher Hamner (instructor), George Mason University • Jean Bauer (instructor), independent contractor • Jason Heppler (instructor), University of Nebraska-Omaha • Jeffrey W.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Practitioners' Needs in Digital Collection Migration To
    publications Case Report Bridge2Hyku: Meeting Practitioners’ Needs in Digital Collection Migration to Open Source Samvera Repository Annie Wu 1,*, Santi Thompson 1 , Anne Washington 1 , Sean Watkins 1, Andrew Weidner 1 , Dean Seeman 2 and Nicholas Woodward 3 1 University Libraries, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (A.W.); [email protected] (S.W.); [email protected] (A.W.) 2 University of Victoria Libraries, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3H5, Canada; [email protected] 3 Texas Digital Library, Austin, TX 78712, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 February 2020; Accepted: 15 April 2020; Published: 21 April 2020 Abstract: The University of Houston Libraries, in partnership and consultation with numerous institutions, was awarded an Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) National Leadership/Project Grant to create the Bridge2Hyku (B2H) Toolkit. Content migration from proprietary systems to open source repositories remains a barrier for many institutions due to lack of tools, tutorials, and documentation. The B2H Toolkit, which includes migration strategies, migration tools, as well as system requirements for transitioning from CONTENTdm to Hyku, acts as a comprehensive resource to facilitate repository migration. Through a phased toolkit development process, the project team solicited inputs and feedback from peer migration practitioners via survey and pilot testing. The analysis of the feedback data was built into use cases which informed the development and enhancement of the migration strategies and tools. Working across institutions with migration practitioners’ needs in mind, the project team was able to successfully release a Toolkit that mitigates migration barriers and fills gaps in the migration process.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis De Grado Como De Posgrado
    Servicio de Recolección de Metadatos genérico para documentos Titulo: Autores : Julieta Paz Rodríguez Vuan Director: Dra. Marisa Raquel De Giusti Asesor profesional: Dr. Gonzalo Luján Villarreal Asesor profesional: Lic. Ariel Jorge Lira Carrera: Licenciatura en sistemas Esta tesina de grado detalla la implementación de una herramienta para permitir y optimizar el intercambio de información estructurada sobre recursos académicos y científicos proveniente de contextos que no necesariamente cumplen estándares de intercambio o esquemas de catalogación normalizados. Para realizar este trabajo, se analizaron y estudiaron las plataformas que publican artículos científicos, las distintas herramientas que éstos utilizan para comunicarse y finalmente los métodos tradicionales que se utilizan para compartir información (datos y metadatos). Con una idea formada se comenzó la creación de una herramienta que permite a los administradores de los repositorios institucionales (tanto CIC-Digital como SEDICI), realizar solicitudes a través de un formulario y que éste, como respuesta, realice la precarga del formulario de autoarchivo agilizando de esta manera la etapa de catalogación de materiales y con ello agilizar el poblamiento de los repositorios institucionales. Para dicha herramienta se estableció un método de extracción de información y un formato para el intercambio de metadatos. Artículo científico, metadato, extracción de metadatos, interoperabilidad A lo largo de esta tesina se explicaron las distintos motivos que dieron como objetivo la creación de esta herramienta, se detalló la investigación realizada del marco teórico junto con el análisis de los requerimientos funcionales para luego llevar al lector a través de la implementación de la herramienta y finalmente mostrar los casos concretos de uso de la herramienta.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Code: Supporting the Mission of Open Access and Preservation with the Use of Open Source Library Technologies Keila Zayas-Ruiz and Mark Baggett
    )ORULGD6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\/LEUDULHV 2018 Community Code: Supporting the Mission of Open Access and Preservation with the Use of Open Source Library Technologies Keila Zayas-Ruiz and Mark Baggett This book chapter was published in Applying Library Values to Emerging Technology: Decision-Making in the Age of Open Access, Maker Spaces, and the Ever-Changing Library (Publications in Librarianship #72) by the Association of College & Research Libraries. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Follow this and additional works at DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] CHAPTER 12 Community Code: Supporting the Mission of Open Access and Preservation with the Use of Open Source Library Technologies Keila Zayas-Ruiz* Sunshine State Digital Network Coordinator Strozier Library, Florida State University Mark Baggett Department Head, Digital Initiatives Hodges Library, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Introduction As librarians, we serve as champions for equal access and preservation of materials, both scholarly and cultural in signiicance. One of the core missions of libraries is access. Due to increased demand for scholarly articles and the technological advances of the internet, open access is quickly becoming a major priority among research libraries today. It “has expanded the possibilities for disseminating one’s own research and accessing that of others.”1 he movement of open access aligns closely with the ALA core value of access as outlined by the ALA council: “All * This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
    [Show full text]