DOCSLIB.ORG

“Make This the Place Where Your Glory Dwells”: Origins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Make This the Place Where Your Glory Dwells”: Origins “MAKE THIS THE PLACE WHERE YOUR GLORY DWELLS”: ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF THE BYZANTINE RITE FOR THE CONSECRATION OF A CHURCH A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Vitalijs Permjakovs ____________________________ Maxwell E. Johnson, Director Graduate Program in Theology Notre Dame, Indiana April 2012 © Copyright 2012 Vitalijs Permjakovs All rights reserved “MAKE THIS THE PLACE WHERE YOUR GLORY DWELLS”: ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF THE BYZANTINE RITE FOR THE CONSECRATION OF A CHURCH Abstract by Vitalijs Permjakovs The Byzantine ritual for dedication of churches, as it appears in its earliest complete text, the eighth-century euchologion Barberini gr. 336, as well as in the textus receptus of the rite, represents a unique collection of scriptural and euchological texts, together with the ritual actions, intended to set aside the physical space of a public building for liturgical use. The Byzantine rite, in its shape already largely present in Barberini gr. 336, actually comprises three major liturgical elements: 1) consecration of the altar; 2) consecration of the church building; 3) deposition of relics. Our earliest Byzantine liturgical text clearly conceives of the consecration of the altar and the deposition of the relics/“renovation” (encaenia) as two distinct rites, not merely elements of a single ritual. This feature of the Barberini text raises an important question, namely, which of these major elements did in fact constitute the act of dedicating/ consecrating the church, and what role did the deposition of relics have in the ceremonies of dedication in the early period of Byzantine liturgical history, considering that the deposition of relics Vitalijs Permjakovs became a mandatory element of the dedication rite only after the provisions to that effect were made at the Second council of Nicaea in 787 CE. This dissertation examines in special detail the origins and development of the consecration of the altar and the church with oil or chrism as evoking significant parallels to the ritual action of initiation liturgies (washing, anointing, vesting). Such connection provides a glimpse into the early theology behind the act of consecration of a liturgical space. A thorough study of the Byzantine dedication rite also allowed us to reevaluate a prominent role of the liturgies of major imperial cities and cultural centers (Jerusalem, Constantinople) in the formation of the Byzantine liturgical tradition. To my grandfather Ivan Vasilyevich Piskun (1919- 2004), who taught me to love history Вhчна# пам#ть! ii CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. ix INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 PART I. THE RITES OF CHURCH DEDICATION IN THE CHRISTIAN EAST: THE FORMATIVE PERIOD (FOURTH-FIFTH CENTURIES). ....................... 31 CHAPTER 1: SEARCHING FOR THE ORIGINS OF CHRISTIAN DEDICATION RITES: SCRIPTURES AND EARLY CHRISTIANITY..................................... 33 1.1 Dedications of the Temple and Tabernacle in the Old Testament ........................ 33 1.1.1 Consecration of Moses’ Tabernacle. ............................................................ 33 1.1.2 Purification of the Tabernacle on the Day of Atonement. ........................... 34 1.1.3 Dedication of the First and Second Temples. .............................................. 36 1.1.4 Heavenly Temple Traditions. ....................................................................... 38 1.2 New Testament. .................................................................................................... 42 1.3 Philo of Alexandria and Josephus. ........................................................................ 46 1.4 Clement and Origen of Alexandria. ...................................................................... 48 1.5 Graeco-Roman Rites of Dedicatio and Consecratio. ........................................... 53 CHAPTER 2: DEDICATION OF CHURCHES IN THE CHRISTIAN EAST, 4TH – 5TH CENT.: JERUSALEM, PALESTINE, SYRIA. .................................................... 61 2.1 Dedication of the Basilica at Tyre. ....................................................................... 66 2.2 Dedication in Jerusalem, 335 ................................................................................ 76 2.2.1 The Feast of Encaenia in Jerusalem in 380s: Egeria. ................................... 89 2.2.2 The Feast of Encaenia in Jerusalem: Sozomen. ........................................... 93 2.2.3 The Feast of Encaenia in Jerusalem: The Armenian Lectionary. ................ 94 2.2.4 Later Hagiographical Traditions Pertaining To The Encaenia In 335. ...... 101 2.3 Dedication of Churches/Altars in Syria: Ephrem the Syrian .............................. 106 2.3.1 Consecration Of An Altar In Hagiography: The Case Of Julian Saba. ..... 110 2.4 Anointing of the Altar in the 4th Cent. Jerusalem? – Homily on the Church by Bishop John II ................................................................................................ 116 2.5 Dedication of the Basilica in Gaza, 406 .............................................................. 130 2.6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 137 iii CHAPTER 3: DEDICATION OF CHURCHES IN THE CHRISTIAN EAST, 4TH CENT.: CONSTANTINOPLE, EGYPT, ASIA MINOR. .................................. 139 3.1 Dedication of Churches in Constantinople, 4th Century ..................................... 139 3.2 Athanasius and His Apologia to Constantius ...................................................... 152 3.3 Gregory of Nyssa on Preparation of the Altar .................................................... 156 3.4 Allusions to the Dedication of Church and Altar in the Works of John Chrysostom ......................................................................................................... 159 3.5 Synesius of Cyrene: Dedication of a Church as a Means of Property Seizure ... 165 3.6 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 169 PART II THE FORMATION OF THE BYZANTINE RITE FOR THE CONSECRATION OF AN ALTAR AND A CHURCH ................................... 176 CHAPTER 4: THE BYZANTINE (CONSTANTINOPOLITAN) RITE FOR THE DEDICATION OF A CHURCH. ....................................................................... 177 4.1 The Byzantine Rite of Dedication of a Church According to the “Old” Recension (Barberini Gr. 336 et alia)................................................................. 178 4.1.1 The Rite of Consecration of the Altar and the Church (Text and Translation). ................................................................................................ 185 The Rite of Kathierôsis (Consecration of an Altar and a Church). ............ 185 The Rite of Encaenia. ................................................................................. 196 4.1.2 The Structure of the Rite in Barberini Gr. 336. ......................................... 199 4.2 “Encaenia” in Barberini Gr. 336 and the Dedications of Churches in Constantinople in the 6th-10th Centuries. ............................................................ 204 4.3 The Western Rites for the Consecration of a New Altar: Washing, Anointing, Deposition of Relics (8th -9th Cent.). ................................................................... 211 4.4 Ὡς Επι Του Aγιου Βαπτισματος: The “Baptism” of the Altar in the Byzantine Rite? A Problem of Interpretation ....................................................................... 221 4.5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 230 CHAPTER 5: THE ORIGINS OF THE BYZANTINE RITE FOR THE TH TH CONSECRATION OF AN ALTAR Ι: BYZANTINE JERUSALEM (5 -7 CENT.). ............................................................................................................... 232 5.1 Encaenia in the Georgian Lectionary .................................................................. 235 5.1.1 September 13 and the Octave of Encaenia In the Georgian Lectionary. ... 239 5.1.2 Dedications of Other Jerusalem Churches in Georgian Lectionary. .......... 247 5.1.3 “Depositions of Relics” in the Jerusalem Lectionary and Dedication. ...... 271 5.1.4 Dedication of Churches and Palestinian Monasticism. .............................. 276 5.1.5 The Rites of Foundation and Dedication of a Church in the Georgian Lectionary. .................................................................................................. 283 Foundation of a Church. ............................................................................. 284 The Dedication of a Church. ...................................................................... 291 5.2 The Feast of Dedication in the Georgian Iadgari ................................................ 302 5.2.1 The Hagiopolite Tropologion/Iadgari: Status Quaestionis ........................ 302 5.2.2 Hymnography of the Georgian Tropologion for September 13................. 309 “Church as Temple”: Recurring Themes in the Iadgari for September 13. 317 “Church as Sion” in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St. Michael and Attis
    St. Michael and Attis Cyril MANGO Δελτίον XAE 12 (1984), Περίοδος Δ'. Στην εκατονταετηρίδα της Χριστιανικής Αρχαιολογικής Εταιρείας (1884-1984)• Σελ. 39-62 ΑΘΗΝΑ 1986 ST. MICHAEL AND ATTIS Twenty years ago, when I was working on the apse mosaics of St. Sophia at Constantinople, I had ample opportunity to contemplate what is surely one of the most beautiful works of Byzantine art, I mean the image of the archangel Gabriel, who stands next to the enthroned Theotokos (Fig. 1). Gabriel is dressed in court costume; indeed, one can affirm that his costume is imperial, since he is wearing red buskins and holding a globe, the symbol of universal dominion. Yet neither the Bible nor orthodox doctrine as defined by the Fathers provides any justification for portraying an archangel in this guise; no matter how great was his dignity in heaven, he remained a minister and a messenger1. Only God could be described as the equivalent of the emperor. How was it then that Byzantine art, which showed extreme reluctance to give to Christ, the pambasileus, any visible attributes of royalty other than the throne, granted these very attributes to archangels, who had no claim to them? An enquiry I undertook at the time (and left unpublished) suggested the following conclusions: 1. The Byzantines themselves, I mean the medieval Byzantines, could offer no reasonable explanation of the iconography of archangels and seemed to be unaware of its meaning. On the subject of the globe I found only two texts. One was an unedited opuscule by Michael Psellos, who, quite absurdly, considered it to denote the angels' rapidity of movement; "for", he says, "the sphere is such an object that, touching as it does only a tiny portion of the ground, is able in less than an instant to travel in any direction"2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dogma of the Assumption in the Light of the First Seven Ecumenical Councils
    University of Dayton eCommons Marian Reprints Marian Library Publications 1-1961 080 - The ogD ma of the Assumption in the Light of the First Seven Ecumenical Councils Gregory Cardinal Peter XV Agagianian Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_reprints Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Agagianian, Gregory Cardinal Peter XV, "080 - The oD gma of the Assumption in the Light of the First Seven Ecumenical Councils" (1961). Marian Reprints. Paper 97. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/marian_reprints/97 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Marian Library Publications at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Reprints by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Gregory Peter XV Cardinal Agagianian is perhaps one of the best­ known of the non-American Cardinals. He has become familiar to Amer­ ican Catholic and non-Catholic readers because of the publicity given to his appointment to succeed Cardinal Stritch as Pro-prefect of the Sacred Congregation of the Faith in June, 1958. At this time and during the period following the death of the late Pius XII, he was considered by many observers as one of the most likely "candidates" for the Papacy. His two trips to the United States in 1954 and in May of this past year have served to bring him to the attention of the American public. Born in the Russian Caucasus sixty-five years ago, Cardinal Agagianian grew up in what is now Russian Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Repentance As Divine Communion in St. Symeon the New Theologian´S Hymns of Divine Love
    International Journal of Orthodox Theology 11:1 (2020) 7 urn:nbn:de:0276-2020-1025 John Anthony McGuckin Repentance as Divine Communion in St. Symeon the New Theologian´s Hymns of Divine Love Abstract Much English language scholarship on St. Symeon the New Theologian has, perhaps understandably, been intri- gued by and focused on the saint's narrative of his luminous visions of the Lord. But this has often served to Archpriest John Anthony distract readers from the primary McGuckin is the Nielsen thrust of the most rhapsodic and ec- Professor of Byzantine static of all his writings, the Hymns Theology Emeritus at Uni- of Divine Love. This paper argues that on Theological Seminary, New York, Professor of this major teaching is the doctrine of Early Christian Thought in radical repentance that the saint the Theological Faculty of espouses: and he does it in such a way Oxford University, Rector as to redirect the flow of earli- of St. Gregory's Orthodox Mission in St. Anne's on er Christian teaching on the develop- Sea in England, and a ping stages of the spiritual life in a Fellow of the British Royal profoundly innovative manner. Historical Society. 8 John Anthony McGuckin Rather than seeing re-pentance as a 'beginner's stage' in spiri- tuality, to be succeeded by 'unitive' and 'contemplative' stages (as in many manuals of spiritual theology which suppose they thus reproduce Pseudo-Dionysios) Symeon appears to pro- ject radical and heartfelt repentance as the royal road to the deepest level of communion with Christ. For him, repentance is one of the highest spiritual states, not the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Orthodoxy and Women's Spirituality In
    RUSSIAN ORTHODOXY AND WOMEN’S SPIRITUALITY IN IMPERIAL RUSSIA* Christine D. Worobec On 8 November 1885, the feast day of Archangel Michael, the Abbess Taisiia had a mystical experience in the midst of a church service dedicated to the tonsuring of sisters at Leushino. The women’s religious community of Leushino had recently been ele­ vated to the status of a monastery.1 Conducting an all-women’s choir on that special day, the abbess became exhilarated by the beautiful refrain of the Cherubikon hymn, “Let us lay aside all earthly cares,” and envisioned Christ surrounded by angels above the iconostasis. She later wrote, “Something was happening, but what it was I am unable to tell, although I saw and heard every­ thing. It was not something of this world. From the beginning of the vision, I seemed to fall into ecstatic rapture Tears were stream­ ing down my face. I realized that everyone was looking at me in astonishment, and even fear....”2 Five years later, a newspaper columnistwitnessedasceneinachurch in the Smolensk village of Egor'-Bunakovo in which a woman began to scream in the midst of the singing of the Cherubikon. He described “a horrible in­ *This book chapter is dedicated to the memory of Brenda Meehan, who pioneered the study of Russian Orthodox women religious in the modern period. 1 The Russian language does not have a separate word such as “convent” or nunnery” to distinguish women’s from men’s monastic institutions. 2 Abbess Thaisia, 194; quoted in Meehan, Holy Women o f Russia, 126. Tapestry of Russian Christianity: Studies in History and Culture.
    [Show full text]
  • TYPIKON (Arranged by Rev
    TYPIKON (Arranged by Rev. Taras Chaparin) March 2016 Sunday, March 26 4th Sunday of Great Lent Commemoration of Saint John of the Ladder (Climacus). Synaxis of the Holy Archangel Gabriel. Tone 4. Matins Gospel I. Liturgy of St. Basil the Great. Bright vestments. Resurrection Tropar (Tone 4); Tropar of the Annunciation; Tropar of St. John (4th Sunday); Glory/Now: Kondak of the Annunciation; Prokimen, Alleluia Verses of Resurrection (Tone 4) and of the Annunciation. Irmos, “In You, O Full of Grace…” Communion Hymn of Resurrection and of the Annunciation. Scripture readings for the 4th Sunday of Lent: Epistle: Hebrew §314 [6:13-20]. Gospel: Mark §40 [9:17-31]. In the evening: Lenten Vespers. Monday, March 27 Our Holy Mother Matrona of Thessalonica. Tuesday, March 28 Our Venerable Father Hilarion the New; the Holy Stephen, the Wonderworker (464). Wednesday, March 29 Our Venerable Father Mark, Bishop of Arethusa; the Deacon Cyril and Others Martyred during the Reign of Julian the Apostate (360-63). Dark vestments. Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts. Scripture readings for the 5th Wednesday of Lent: Genesis 17:1-9; Proverbs 15:20-16:9. Thursday, March 30 Our Venerable Father John Climacus, Author of The Ladder of Divine Ascent (c. 649). Great Canon of St. Andrew of Crete. Friday, March 31 Our Venerable Father Hypatius, Bishop of Gangra (312-37). Dark vestments. Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts. Scripture readings for the 5th Friday of Lent: Genesis 22:1-18; Proverbs 17:17-18:5. April 2016 Saturday, April 1 5th Saturday of Lent – Saturday of the Akathist Hymn Our Venerable Mother Mary of Egypt (527-65).
    [Show full text]
  • Constantinople As Center and Crossroad
    Constantinople as Center and Crossroad Edited by Olof Heilo and Ingela Nilsson SWEDISH RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN ISTANBUL TRANSACTIONS, VOL. 23 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................... 7 OLOF HEILO & INGELA NILSSON WITH RAGNAR HEDLUND Constantinople as Crossroad: Some introductory remarks ........................................................... 9 RAGNAR HEDLUND Byzantion, Zeuxippos, and Constantinople: The emergence of an imperial city .............................................. 20 GRIGORI SIMEONOV Crossing the Straits in the Search for a Cure: Travelling to Constantinople in the Miracles of its healer saints .......................................................... 34 FEDIR ANDROSHCHUK When and How Were Byzantine Miliaresia Brought to Scandinavia? Constantinople and the dissemination of silver coinage outside the empire ............................................. 55 ANNALINDEN WELLER Mediating the Eastern Frontier: Classical models of warfare in the work of Nikephoros Ouranos ............................................ 89 CLAUDIA RAPP A Medieval Cosmopolis: Constantinople and its foreigners .............................................. 100 MABI ANGAR Disturbed Orders: Architectural representations in Saint Mary Peribleptos as seen by Ruy González de Clavijo ........................................... 116 ISABEL KIMMELFIELD Argyropolis: A diachronic approach to the study of Constantinople’s suburbs ................................... 142 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS MILOŠ
    [Show full text]
  • Jan/Feb Newsletter 2021
    St. Thérèse’s poem is about the fragility and brevity of life. She reminds us that we have only today to live in faith and to show our love for God and others by genuine acts of kindness, generosity and compassion. In the midst of St. Thérèse’s physical and moral sufferings, and her own interior darkness, she faced life Dear Parishioners of St Mary of the Hill, with extraordinary realism. To love is not a dream or emotion locked in her heart. Love is real and expressed concretely in the I am writing this on December 8, Solemnity here and now, especially in her relationships. Her reflection on of the Immaculate Conception. I just heard on fraternal life in Manuscript “C” in the Story of a Soul is a the news that the first person was vaccinated against Covid 19 in profound spiritual treatise on loving others in the present moment England today. Hopefully this is a sign that this international and in the midst of darkness and poverty. The importance of the pandemic will be over in the not to distant future. The pandemic present moment is an essential element of her “way of confidence teaches us to be still and accept the unknown. “When will this and love.” “Let us see only each moment!...A moment is a end?” We learn to live day by day, one day at a time. We have treasure.” (GCI, p. 558). “We have only this short moment of this often heard people say, “We don’t know whether we can travel life to give to God.” (GCII, 882).
    [Show full text]
  • Fortifications and Town Planning in Kyrrhos: Its Hellenistic Origin and Its Evolution Jeanine Abdul Massih, Mathilde Gelin
    Fortifications and town planning in Kyrrhos: its Hellenistic origin and its evolution Jeanine Abdul Massih, Mathilde Gelin To cite this version: Jeanine Abdul Massih, Mathilde Gelin. Fortifications and town planning in Kyrrhos: its Hellenistic origin and its evolution. Rune Frederiksen; Silke Müth; Peter I.Schneider; Mike Schnelle. Focus on fortifications. New Research on Fortifications in the Ancient Mediterranean and the NearEast, Oxbow Books, pp.207-219, 2016, Monographs of the Danish Institute at Athens, 978-1-78570-131-3. hal-03025892 HAL Id: hal-03025892 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03025892 Submitted on 1 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License FOCUS ON FOCUS ON FORTIFICATIONS New Research on Fortifications in the Ancient Mediterranean and the Near East AN OFFPRINT FROM Fokus Fortifikation Studies: Volume 2 FOCUS ON FORTIFICATIONS New Research on Fortifications in the Ancient Mediterranean and the Near East edited by Rune Frederiksen, Silke Müth, Peter I. Schneider and Mike Schnelle Hardcover Edition: ISBN 978-1-78570-131-3 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-78570-132-0 Monographs of the Danish Institute at Athens, Volume 18 © Oxbow Books 2016 Oxford & Philadelphia www.oxbowbooks.com Published in the United Kingdom in 2016 by OXBOW BOOKS 10 Hythe Bridge Street, Oxford OX1 2EW and in the United States by OXBOW BOOKS 1950 Lawrence Road, Havertown, PA 19083 Monographs of the Danish Institute at Athens, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Antioch Ian Legacy for Today I
    ANTIOCHANTIOCH IANIAN LEGACYLEGACY FORFOR TODAYTODAY II Fr.Fr. MichelMichel NajimNajim www.Frmichel.najim.netwww.Frmichel.najim.net COURSECOURSE DESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION •• YEARYEAR ONE:ONE: SeeSee ofof Antioch.Antioch. TheThe importanceimportance ofof AntiochianAntiochian historyhistory andand legacy.legacy. AntiochAntioch duringduring thethe GrecoGreco--RomanRoman period.period. EarlyEarly AntiochianAntiochian Councils.Councils. AntiochAntioch andand thethe EcumenicalEcumenical Councils.Councils. EarlyEarly AntiochianAntiochian writers:writers: GreekGreek literature,literature, SyriacSyriac literature.literature. AntiochianAntiochian LiturgicalLiturgical tradition.tradition. AntiochainAntiochain Monasticism.Monasticism. MissionaryMissionary rolerole ofof Antioch.Antioch. TheThe ChaliceChalice ofof AntiochAntioch TheThe OldestOldest LiturgicalLiturgical ChaliceChalice •• ThisThis chalicechalice waswas foundfound inin 19101910 nearnear Antioch.Antioch. ItIt goesgoes toto 2th2th centurycentury AD.AD. ItIt isis 77 1/21/2 inchesinches (19(19 cm)cm) high.high. TheThe innerinner cupcup isis mademade ofof plainplain silver,silver, andand thethe outerouter cupcup isis silversilver gilded.gilded. ThisThis cupcup isis decorateddecorated withwith 1212 figuresfigures twotwo representrepresent Christ,Christ, thethe othersothers representrepresent thethe EvangelistsEvangelists andand thethe Apostles.Apostles. ChristChrist thethe SaviorSavior andand thethe YouthfulYouthful ChristChrist TheThe Apostles:Apostles: Andrew,Andrew, JamesJames thethe Greater,Greater,
    [Show full text]
  • Other Patristic Studies
    Other Patristic Studies Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 12:31:40PM via free access . Downloaded from Brill.com09/26/2021 12:31:40PM via free access Ekaterina Kovalchuk Leuven, Belgium [email protected] THE HOLY SEPULCHRE OF JERUSALEM AND ST SOPHIA OF CONSTANTINOPLE: AN ATTEMPT AT DISCOVERING A HAGIOGRAPHIC EXPRESSION OF THE BYZANTINE ENCAENIA FEAST Constantine the Great and the Foundation of the Holy Sepulchre For a student of Late Antiquity and Byzantine civilization, Con- stantine the Great is known, fi rst and foremost, as the ruler who intro- duced Christianity as an offi cial religion of the Roman Empire. Apart from that, his name is fi rmly associated with the foundation of the eponymous city of Constantinople, which was to become a centre of the Eastern Christian civilization. A closer look at the contemporary sources, however, suggests that the fi rst Christian Emperor did not give the newly-founded city of Constantinople priority in his policies and building projects. During his reign, Constantine the Great dis- played extraordinary interest in Jerusalem, leaving Constantinople rather overshadowed. One may puzzle why Eusebius, who is the main contemporary source for the reign of Constantine the Great, gave but cursory treatment to the foundation and dedication of Constantinople while dwelling upon the subject of Palestinian church-building — and especially the foundation and dedication of the Holy Sepulchre church in Jerusalem1 — so exten- (1) The Holy Sepulchre is a later name for the complex erected by Con- stantine at the allegedly historical places of Golgotha and the tomb where Christ was buried.
    [Show full text]
  • •Aduates Get Awards Fr. O'keefe, One Year in Office, T Encaenia
    SECOND ANNUAL COMMENCEMENT EDITION IVcl. 46, No. 13 Fcfdham ColleSe. Bronx, N.Y., 10458-lune 10, 1964 Eight Pages •aduates Get Awards Fr. O'Keefe, One Year in Office, t Encaenia Ceremony To Deliver Graduation Address Last evening before a large gathering of College seniors After an estimatsd 1,550 grad- [their parents and friends, Fordham College held its annual uates don their white, purple, mark of Jesuit education." Awards Night and Encaenia ceremony. blue, yellow and scarlet silk Expansion has characterized James S. Donnelly presided as Master of Ceremonies and hoods this afternoon to receive the University dining the last .ntroduced the various speakers the first of whom was John degrees from eight schools of the few years: Lincoln Square, p. Quinn who delivered the "Lord of the Manor" address. University, Pordham celebrates Thomas More College, Dsaly Hall Tlie second speaker was James an age-old tradition when Fr. renovation and other projects, Ibgarty, President of the Vincent T. O'Keefe, president planned or underway. For the ;;ass of '64 who was selected of the Unlversity,~aelivers the Past lour years, however, Father commencement address to the has worked with the University's present the annual Encaenia Rose Hill community. wards to the ten graduates of "Self-Study" Committee insure tordham College who have ob- This myriad-colored June ex- that quality will not be sacri- tained "outstanding achieve- cercise also marks the first anni- ficed to the pressures of our col- ment" in their chosen fields. versary of Father O'Keefe's ten- lege, age population incre-is?.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Rite Catholicism
    Eastern Rite Catholicism Religious Practices Religious Items Requirements for Membership Medical Prohibitions Dietary Standards Burial Rituals Sacred Writings Organizational Structure History Theology RELIGIOUS PRACTICES Required Daily Observances. None. However, daily personal prayer is highly recommended. Required Weekly Observances. Participation in the Divine Liturgy (Mass) is required. If the Divine Liturgy is not available, participation in the Latin Rite Mass fulfills the requirement. Required Occasional Observances. The Eastern Rites follow a liturgical calendar, as does the Latin Rite. However, there are significant differences. The Eastern Rites still follow the Julian Calendar, which now has a difference of about 13 days – thus, major feasts fall about 13 days after they do in the West. This could be a point of contention for Eastern Rite inmates practicing Western Rite liturgies. Sensitivity should be maintained by possibly incorporating special prayer on Eastern Rite Holy days into the Mass. Each liturgical season has a focus; i.e., Christmas (Incarnation), Lent (Human Mortality), Easter (Salvation). Be mindful that some very important seasons do not match Western practices; i.e., Christmas and Holy Week. Holy Days. There are about 28 holy days in the Eastern Rites. However, only some require attendance at the Divine Liturgy. In the Byzantine Rite, those requiring attendance are: Epiphany, Ascension, St. Peter and Paul, Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary, and Christmas. Of the other 15 solemn and seven simple holy days, attendance is not mandatory but recommended. (1 of 5) In the Ukrainian Rites, the following are obligatory feasts: Circumcision, Easter, Dormition of Mary, Epiphany, Ascension, Immaculate Conception, Annunciation, Pentecost, and Christmas.
    [Show full text]