DOCSLIB.ORG

2 Kings 9 & 2 Chronicles 22:1-9 | Reaping the Harvest of Sin The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2 Kings 9 & 2 Chronicles 22:1-9 | Reaping the Harvest of Sin The Men’s Study & Coffee | March 13, 2018 | 2 Kings, Week Nine (*notes from “Be Distinct” by Warren Wiersbe) 2 Kings 9 & 2 Chronicles 22:1-9 | Reaping the Harvest of Sin The suddenness of opportunity. (2 Kings 9:1–13) The scene now shifts to Ramoth Gilead where Israel and Judah had combined their forces to recover the city from the Syrians. One of the key commanders of the Israeli army was Jehu, the son of Jehoshaphat, but not the Jehoshaphat who was king of Judah and the father of Jehoram. Unknown to Jehu, the Prophet Elisha had dispatched one of the young sons of the prophets to anoint him king of Israel. This was the third assignment God gave Elijah (1 Kings 19:15–16). Instead of going to the battlefield himself, Elisha wisely gave the young man the authority to anoint Jehu privately. Elisha advised the student to flee the scene as fast as he could, for obviously there was going to be serious conflict. Jehu was having a staff meeting in the courtyard when the young man approached and asked for a private audience with the commander. They went into a private room in the house and there the young man anointed Jehu to be the new king of Israel. It’s interesting that the young prophet called the people of Israel “the people of the Lord” (9:6). Even though Israel and Judah were separate kingdoms and not obedient to the covenant, the people were still the chosen ones of the Lord and Abraham’s descendants. God’s covenants with Abraham (Gen. 12:1–3) and with David (2 Sam. 7) would still stand. The people had turned away from the Lord, but He had not forsaken them. The young man didn’t end his work with the anointing but went on to explain to Jehu the work God wanted him to do. His main task was to wipe out the family of Ahab in Israel and execute God’s judgment upon them because of the innocent people they had killed. He specifically mentioned Jezebel’s crimes and her judgment, referring to the words Elijah spoke when he confronted Ahab (1 Kings 21:21–24). That prophecy may have been forgotten by Ahab’s descendants, but God remembered it, and the time had come to fulfill it. Just as God had wiped out the descendants of Jeroboam and Baasha (1 Kings 15:25–16:7), He would use Jehu to destroy the house of Ahab. The officers in the courtyard must have wondered who the young man was and why his message to Jehu was so confidential. Did he come from the front? Would there be a change in the battle plan? When the young man ran out of the house and fled, the officers were sure he was out of his mind. More than one servant of God has been accused of madness, including Paul (Acts 26:24; 2 Cor. 5:13) and Jesus (Mark 3:20–21, 31–35; John 10:20). Actually, it’s the lost world that is mad and God’s people who are the sane ones. Was it a mark of humility in Jehu that he didn’t immediately announce that he was king? The officers had to pull the truth out of him, but once they knew, they accepted their commander’s promotion and openly acknowledged it. As far as the biblical record is concerned, Jehu is the only king of Israel who was anointed by an appointed servant of the Lord. Jehu’s opportunity came suddenly, but he accepted it by faith and immediately began to serve the Lord. A Chinese proverb says, “Opportunity has a forelock but not a pigtail. Once it is past, you cannot grasp it.” As the tenth king of Israel, Jehu started a new dynasty and reigned for twenty-eight years (10:36). The swiftness of God’s judgment. (2 Kings 9:14–37; 2 Chron. 22:1–9) Here is the situation as Jehu began his crusade. Ahaziah was reigning in Judah and following the counsel of his wicked mother, Athaliah, and the leaders in the house of Ahab in Israel. Baal was his god and he had no interest in the law of the Lord. Ahaziah had gone to Jezreel to visit King Joram, who was recovering from wounds received at Ramoth Gilead and did not know that God had given Israel a new king. Jehu wanted to catch his enemies by surprise, so he ordered his officers not to spread the word that he was king. The death of Joram (vv. 16–26). It was about forty-five miles from Ramoth Gilead to Jezreel, but Jehu was a fast and daring charioteer and his men were accustomed to traveling at speeds that were alarming in those days. The word “peace” (shalom) is repeated eight times in this section (vv. 17–19, 22, 31), but the event was actually a declaration of war. Without slowing his pace, Jehu received Joram’s two messengers and commanded them to ride with his company, and they obeyed. However, when his two messengers failed to return to Jezreel, Joram became suspicious and ordered his own chariot to be readied for an escape. In a move that made Jehu’s work much easier, Joram and Ahaziah each mounted his royal chariot and rode out to meet the man who had now been identified as Jehu. Perhaps the two kings were hoping that Jehu was bringing good news from the front. Joram’s question “Have you come in peace?” might have meant “Has the battle at Ramoth ended in our favor?” or “Is your mission one of peace?” If it was the latter, it suggests that Jehu might have been somewhat of a “loose cannon” in Joram’s army, and perhaps Joram suspected he had designs on the throne. Jehu’s reply instantly told the king that danger was in the air, and he tried to get away. Joram warned his nephew Ahaziah, who did escape but was later caught, but one well-directed arrow ended the life of Joram. As a patient recuperating from wounds, Joram wouldn’t be wearing his armor. Providentially, he died on the property of Naboth that Ahab and Jezebel had taken after killing Naboth and his sons. Thus the Lord fulfilled the prophecy He gave to Elijah (1 Kings 21:18–24). Jehu not only executed the king of Israel, but he also killed all the royal princes (2 Chron. 22:8). The death of Ahaziah (vv. 27–29; 2 Chron. 22:1–9). The reports of Ahaziah’s death in 2 Kings 9:27–29 and 2 Chronicles 22:7–9 aren’t easy to harmonize, but we suggest a scenario. Ahaziah was wounded as he fled from Jezreel (v. 27). He made it to Beth-haggan and then turned northwest at the Ascent of Gur and headed for Megiddo where he tried to hide from Jehu. But Jehu’s men tracked him down and killed him at Megiddo. Ahaziah’s servants carried his body from Megiddo to Jerusalem where he was buried with the kings, for he was a descendant of David. Had he not compromised with Joram, worshiped Baal, and followed his mother, Athaliah’s, counsel, he would have been spared all this shame and defeat. The death of Jezebel (vv. 30–37). It didn’t take long for Jezebel and the palace residents to hear that Jehu was in Jezreel, that he was king, and that he had killed her son Joram. She put on her makeup, “attired her head,” and watched at an upper window, waited for him to show up. When she saw him come through the gate, she called, “Is it well, Zimri, your master’s murderer?” (v. 31, NASB). About fifty years before, Zimri had killed King Elah and made himself king and then had proceeded to exterminate the family of Baasha (1 Kings 16:8–20). Since Zimri ruled for only seven days and then died a suicide, Jezebel was obviously trying to warn Jehu that his authority was weak and his days were numbered. She might even have been suggesting that Jehu form an alliance with her and strengthen his throne. But Jehu knew his mandate from the Lord. When he called for evidence of loyalty from the palace personnel, two or three servants responded, and they threw Jezebel out the window to the courtyard below. Jehu rode his horse over her body until he was sure she was dead. Since he was now king, Jehu went into the palace and called for something to eat. As he was dining, he remembered that, evil as she was, Jezebel was a princess, the daughter of Ethbaal, the Sidonian ruler (1 Kings 16:29–31); so he ordered the servants to bury her body. But it was too late. Smelling human blood, the wild dogs showed up and ate her body, leaving only her skull, feet and the palms of her hands. It was a gruesome scene, but it was what Elijah had predicted would happen (1 Kings 21:21–24). God’s Word never fails but accomplishes His purposes on the earth (Isa. 55:10–11). 2 Kings 9 | Study Questions: 1. What did Elisha’s servant say that Jehu must do? 2. After killing Joram, what did Jehu do that he was not told by God to do? 3. What was the prophecy about Jezebel that was fulfilled at her death? Discussion Questions: 1. What is the most important thing, the Big Idea? 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2 the Assyrian Empire, the Conquest of Israel, and the Colonization of Judah 37 I
    ISRAEL AND EMPIRE ii ISRAEL AND EMPIRE A Postcolonial History of Israel and Early Judaism Leo G. Perdue and Warren Carter Edited by Coleman A. Baker LONDON • NEW DELHI • NEW YORK • SYDNEY 1 Bloomsbury T&T Clark An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc Imprint previously known as T&T Clark 50 Bedford Square 1385 Broadway London New York WC1B 3DP NY 10018 UK USA www.bloomsbury.com Bloomsbury, T&T Clark and the Diana logo are trademarks of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc First published 2015 © Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Leo G. Perdue, Warren Carter and Coleman A. Baker have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as Authors of this work. No responsibility for loss caused to any individual or organization acting on or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by Bloomsbury or the authors. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN: HB: 978-0-56705-409-8 PB: 978-0-56724-328-7 ePDF: 978-0-56728-051-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset by Forthcoming Publications (www.forthpub.com) 1 Contents Abbreviations vii Preface ix Introduction: Empires, Colonies, and Postcolonial Interpretation 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Athaliah and Alexandra: Gender and Queenship
    University of Birmingham Athaliah and Alexandra: Gender and Queenship in Josephus Scales, Joseph; Quine, Cat Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Scales, J & Quine, C 2020, 'Athaliah and Alexandra: Gender and Queenship in Josephus', Journal of Ancient Judaism, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 233–250. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive. If you believe that this is the case for this document, please contact [email protected] providing details and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Kings 9:1-28 Elisha & Jehu
    2 Kings 9:1-28 Elisha & Jehu: Different Callings Proposition: Faithfulness can look very different according to the Lord’s calling Introduction Bob Dylan Reflects on Calling – Mikal Gilmore The September 2012 issue of Rolling Stone contained a lengthy interview with Bob Dylan. The interviewer noted to Dylan, "You've described what you do not as a career but as a calling." Dylan responded with wisdom and a warning: Everybody has a calling, don't they? Some have a high calling, some have a low calling. Everybody is called, but few are chosen. There is a lot of distraction for people, so you might not even find the real you. A lot of people don't. — Quoted from Denis Hack, "Discovering Your Calling … Slowly," Critique (2012 Issue 6); original source: Mikal Gilmore, "Bob Dylan: The Rolling Stone Interview," Rolling Stone (9- 27-12) There is a real truth in Bob Dylan’s words about calling Each of us is called by God for various assignments Some are called to do earth shaking things Many are called to do ordinary mundane things Whether great or small we should be faithful to follow the Lord’s calling The result is, faithfulness can look very different according to the Lord’s calling Elisha has Jehu Anointed King of Israel (An anonymous faithful servant) Clear instructions (vv. 1-3) 1 Now Elisha the prophet called one of the sons of the prophets and said to him, "Gird up your loins, and take this flask of oil in your hand and go to Ramoth-gilead.
    [Show full text]
  • Divided Kingdom
    Divided Kingdom Lesson 9 Review: Division to Jehu Divided Kingdom: Kings of Israel Jeroboam – 22y Jehoahaz – 17y Nadab - 2y Joash (Jehoash) – 16y Baasha – 24y Jeroboam II – 41y Elah – 2y Zechariah – 6m Zimri – 1w Shallum – 1m Omri – 12y Menahem – 10y Ahab – 22y Pekahiah – 2y Ahaziah – 2y Pekah – 20y Jehoram (Joram) – 12y Hoshea – 9y – 28y Divided Kingdom: Kings of Israel Jeroboam – 22y Jehoahaz – 17y Nadab - 2y Joash (Jehoash) – 16y Baasha – 24y Jeroboam II – 41y Elah – 2y Zechariah – 6m Zimri – 1w Shallum – 1m Omri – 12y Menahem – 10y Ahab – 22y Pekahiah – 2y Ahaziah – 2y Pekah – 20y Jehoram (Joram) – 12y Hoshea – 9y – 28y Divided Kingdom: Kings of Israel Jeroboam – 22y Jehoahaz – 17y Nadab - 2y Joash (Jehoash) – 16y Baasha – 24y Jeroboam II – 41y Elah – 2y Zechariah – 6m Zimri – 1w Shallum – 1m Omri – 12y Menahem – 10y Ahab – 22y Pekahiah – 2y Ahaziah – 2y Pekah – 20y Jehoram (Joram) – 12y Hoshea – 9y – 28y Divided Kingdom: Kings of Israel Jeroboam – 22y Jehoahaz – 17y Nadab - 2y Joash (Jehoash) – 16y Baasha – 24y Jeroboam II – 41y Elah – 2y Zechariah – 6m Zimri – 1w Shallum – 1m Omri – 12y Menahem – 10y Ahab – 22y Pekahiah – 2y Ahaziah – 2y Pekah – 20y Jehoram (Joram) – 12y Hoshea – 9y – 28y Divided Kingdom: Kings of Israel Jeroboam – 22y Jehoahaz – 17y Nadab - 2y Joash (Jehoash) – 16y Baasha – 24y Jeroboam II – 41y Elah – 2y Zechariah – 6m Zimri – 1w Shallum – 1m Omri – 12y Menahem – 10y Ahab – 22y Pekahiah – 2y Ahaziah – 2y Pekah – 20y Jehoram
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority of Scripture: the Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A
    The Authority of Scripture: The Puzzle of the Genealogies of Jesus Mako A. Nagasawa, June 2005 Four Main Differences in the Genealogies Provided by Matthew and Luke 1. Is Jesus descended through the line of Solomon (Mt) or the line of Nathan (Lk)? Or both? 2. Are there 27 people from David to Jesus (Mt) or 42 (Lk)? 3. Who was Joseph’s father? Jacob (Mt) or Heli (Lk)? 4. What is the lineage of Shealtiel and Zerubbabel? a. Are they the same father-son pair in Mt as in Lk? (Apparently popular father-son names were repeated across families – as with Jacob and Joseph in Matthew’s genealogy) If not, then no problem. I will, for purposes of this discussion, assume that they are not the same father-son pair. b. If so, then there is another problem: i. Who was Shealtiel’s father? Jeconiah (Mt) or Neri (Lk)? ii. Who was Zerubbabel’s son? Abihud (Mt) or Rhesa (Lk)? And where are these two in the list of 1 Chronicles 3:19-20 ( 19b the sons of Zerubbabel were Meshullam and Hananiah, and Shelomith was their sister; 20 and Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah and Jushab-hesed, five)? Cultural Factors 1. Simple remarriage. It is likely that in most marriages, men were older and women were younger (e.g. Joseph and Mary). So it is also likely that when husbands died, many women remarried. This was true in ancient times: Boaz married the widow Ruth, David married the widow Bathsheba after Uriah was killed. It also seems likely to have been true in classical, 1 st century times: Paul (in Rom.7:1-3) suggests that this is at least somewhat common in the Jewish community (‘I speak to those under the Law’ he says) in the 1 st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Athaliah, a Treacherous Queen: a Careful Analysis of Her Story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21
    Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 Robin Gallaher Branch School of Biblical Sciences & Bible Languages Potchefstroom Campus North-West University POTCHEFSTROOM E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Athaliah, a treacherous queen: A careful analysis of her story in 2 Kings 11 and 2 Chronicles 22:10-23:21 This article presents a critical look at the story of the reign of Athaliah, the only ruling queen of Israel or Judah in the biblical text. Double reference in 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles shows her story’s importance and significance to the biblical writers. The largely parallel accounts read like a contemporary soap opera, for they contain murder, intrigue, harem politics, religious upheaval, and coup and counter-coup. Her story provides insights on the turbulent political climate of the ninth century BC. However, the purpose of the biblical writers is not to show Athaliah as the epitome of evil or that all women in power are evil. Opsomming Atalia, ’n verraderlike koningin: ’n noukeurige analise van haar verhaal in 2 Konings 11 en 2 Kronieke 22:10-23:21 In hierdie artikel word die verhaal van Atalia krities nagegaan. Atalia was naamlik die enigste koninging van Israel of Juda wie se regeringstyd in die Bybelteks verhaal word. Die dubbele verwysings na hierdie tyd in 2 Konings en 2 Kronieke dui op die belangrikheid en betekenis van haar verhaal vir die Bybel- skrywers. Die twee weergawes wat grotendeels parallelle weer- gawes is, lees byna soos ’n hedendaagse sepie, want hierdie verhale sluit elemente in soos moord, intrige, harempolitiek, godsdiensopstand, staatsgreep en kontrastaatsgreep.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanukkah Study Session
    Hanukkah Study Session December 9, 2020 What is Hanukkah? (Talmud Shabbat 21b) What is the reason for Hanukkah? For our rabbis taught: On the 25th of Kislev begins the days of Hanukkah which are eight and on which lamentation for the dead and fasting are forbidden. For when the Greeks entered the Temple, the defiled all of the oils therein, and when the Hasmonean dynasty prevailed against and defeated them, they made search and found only one cruse of oil which lay with the seal of the high priest, but which contained sufficient oil for one day’s lighting only; yet a miracle was wrought and they lit the lamp for eight days. The following year these days were appointed as a festival with the recital of Hallel and Thanksgiving. (Shabbat 21b) Look, at what time and what day the heathen had profaned the Temple, even in that was it dedicated with songs, and citherns, and harps, and cymbals. Then all the people fell upon their faces, worshipping and praising the God of heaven, who had given them good success. And so they kept the dedication of the altar eight days and offered burnt offerings with gladness, and sacrificed the sacrifice of deliverance and praise. They decked also the forefront of the temple with crowns of gold, and with shields; and the gates and the chambers they renewed, and hanged doors upon them. Thus was there very great gladness among the people, for that the reproach of the heathen was put away. Moreover Judas and his brethren with the whole congregation of Israel ordained, that the days of the dedication of the altar should be kept in their season from year to year by the space of eight days, from the five and twentieth day of the month Casleu, with mirth and gladness.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart of the Kings of Israel and Judah
    The Kings of Israel & Judah Why Study the Kings? Chart of the Kings Questions for Discussion The Heritage of Jesus Host: Alan's Gleanings Alphabetical List of the Kings A Comment about Names God's Message of Salvation Kings of the United Kingdom (c 1025-925 BC) Relationship to God's King Previous King Judgment Saul none did evil Ishbosheth* son (unknown) David none did right Solomon did right in youth, son (AKA Jedidiah) evil in old age * The kingdom was divided during Ishbosheth's reign; David was king over the tribe of Judah. Kings of Judah (c 925-586 BC) Kings of Israel (c 925-721 BC) Relationship to God's Relationship to God's King King Previous King Judgment Previous King Judgment Rehoboam son did evil Abijam Jeroboam servant did evil son did evil (AKA Abijah) Nadab son did evil Baasha none did evil Asa son did right Elah son did evil Zimri captain did evil Omri captain did evil Ahab son did evil Jehoshaphat son did right Ahaziah son did evil Jehoram son did evil (AKA Joram) Jehoram son of Ahab did evil Ahaziah (AKA Joram) (AKA Azariah son did evil or Jehoahaz) Athaliah mother did evil Jehu captain mixed Joash did right in youth, son of Ahaziah Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Joash did right in youth, son did evil Amaziah son (AKA Jehoash) evil in old age Jeroboam II son did evil Zachariah son did evil did evil Uzziah Shallum none son did right (surmised) (AKA Azariah) Menahem none did evil Pekahiah son did evil Jotham son did right Pekah captain did evil Ahaz son did evil Hoshea none did evil Hezekiah son did right Manasseh son did evil Amon son did evil Josiah son did right Jehoahaz son did evil (AKA Shallum) Jehoiakim Assyrian captivity son of Josiah did evil (AKA Eliakim) Jehoiachin (AKA Coniah son did evil or Jeconiah) Zedekiah son of Josiah did evil (AKA Mattaniah) Babylonian captivity Color Code Legend: King did right King did evil Other.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography of Salvation
    ©2020 John Oswalt. Reproduction of all or any substantial part of these materials is prohibited except for personal, individual use. No part of these materials may be distributed or copied for any other purpose without written permission. For information about these or other Bible study materials, contact: PO Box 7 Wilmore, KY 40390 859-858-4222 800-530-5673 [email protected] www.francisasburysociety.com Other Bible studies by the author include: Exodus Isaiah TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 KINGS 17–18 ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 1 KINGS 19–20 ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 1 KINGS 21–22 ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 1 KINGS 22:51–2 KINGS 2:35 ................................................................................................................................ 13 2 KINGS 3–4 ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 2 KINGS 5–6:23 .................................................................................................................................................... 19 2 KINGS 6:24–8:6 ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • H 02-UP-011 Assyria Io02
    he Hebrew Bible records the history of ancient Israel reign. In three different inscriptions, Shalmaneser III and Judah, relating that the two kingdoms were recounts that he received tribute from Tyre, Sidon, and united under Saul (ca. 1000 B.C.) Jehu, son of Omri, in his 18th year, tand became politically separate fol- usually figured as 841 B.C. Thus, Jehu, lowing Solomon’s death (ca. 935 B.C.). the next Israelite king to whom the The division continued until the Assyrians refer, appears in the same Assyrians, whose empire was expand- order as described in the Bible. But he ing during that period, exiled Israel is identified as ruling a place with a in the late eighth century B.C. different geographic name, Bit Omri But the goal of the Bible was not to (the house of Omri). record history, and the text does not One of Shalmaneser III’s final edi- shy away from theological explana- tions of annals, the Black Obelisk, tions for events. Given this problem- contains another reference to Jehu. In atic relationship between sacred the second row of figures from the interpretation and historical accura- top, Jehu is depicted with the caption, cy, historians welcomed the discovery “Tribute of Iaua (Jehu), son of Omri. of ancient Assyrian cuneiform docu- Silver, gold, a golden bowl, a golden ments that refer to people and places beaker, golden goblets, pitchers of mentioned in the Bible. Discovered gold, lead, staves for the hand of the in the 19th century, these historical king, javelins, I received from him.”As records are now being used by schol- scholar Michele Marcus points out, ars to corroborate and augment the Jehu’s placement on this monument biblical text, especially the Bible’s indicates that his importance for the COPYRIGHT THE BRITISH MUSEUM “historical books” of Kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestry of Jehu Cox Knox County, Kentucky, Was
    Ancestry of Jehu Cox Knox County, Kentucky, was chosen by providence for the advent of Jehu Cox. Destiny ruled that he would be a great empire builder, a champion of Mormonism, and the ancestor of a great family of truth seekers. Kentucky, his "Old Kentucky Home" takes the name from an Indian name, meaning, "Land of Tomorrow," was first discovered by Marquette and Joliet in 1673. The Iroquoians whom Marquette found in the region described their country as a meadow land--a truly accurate description. The area was an ideal hunting ground for the Indians. Before the coming of the white man the Indian tribes prized the area so highly that a life and death struggle ensued for its possession. It was truly a "Dark and Bloody Ground" when Daniel Boone first explored it in 1767. Eight years later (1775) Daniel built the wilderness Road from Virginia into Kentucky. This famous road (later used by the Cox family) followed an Indian trail to the top of the Appalachian Mountains--better known as Cumberland Gap--then down the Cumberland River into Kentucky and Tennessee. For a century after 1775 a stream of settlers followed that road to find new homes in the west. Kentucky was given statehood June 1, 1792, eleven years before the advent of Jehu. The time chosen by providence for the advent of Jehu was September 5, 1803, simultaneously with his arrival the American people were passing through a great crisis. Tensions had been caused by the Louisiana issue. Napoleon had stolen this territory from Spain and was then offering it for sale to the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Chronicles
    YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE BIBLE 2 Chronicles BOB UTLEY PROFESSOR OF HERMENEUTICS (BIBLE INTERPRETATION) STUDY GUIDE COMMENTARY SERIES OLD TESTAMENT VOL. 7B BIBLE LESSONS INTERNATIONAL MARSHALL, TEXAS 2017 INTRODUCTION TO 1 AND 2 CHRONICLES I. NAME OF THE BOOK A. The name of the book in Hebrew is “the words (events) of the days (years).” This is used in the sense of “a chronicle of the years.” These same words occur in the title of several books mentioned as written sources in 1 Kings 14:19,29; 15:7,23,31; 16:5,14,20,27; 22:46. The phrase itself is used over thirty times in 1 and 2 Kings and is usually translated “chronicles.” B. The LXX entitled it “the things omitted (concerning the Kings of Judah).” This implies that Chronicles is to Samuel and Kings what the Gospel of John is to the Synoptic Gospels. See How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth, by Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart, pp. 127-148. As the Gospel writers under inspiration (see Special Topic: Inspiration) had the right to select, adapt, and arrange the life of Jesus (not invent actions or words), so too, the inspired authors of OT narratives (see Expository Hermeneutics: An Introduction, by Elliott E. Johnson, p. 169). This selection, adaptation, and chronological/thematic arrangement of words/events was to convey theological truth. History is used as a servant of theology. Chronicles has suffered, much as the Gospel of Mark did. They were both seen as “Readers Digest” summaries and not “a full history.” This is unfortunate! Both have an inspired message.
    [Show full text]