DOCSLIB.ORG

Experiences from the Operational Fields

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mission de l’Organisation des Nations Unies United Nations Organization Stabilization pour la Stabilisation en Mission in République Démocratique du Congo the Democratic Republic of the Congo MONUSCO UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO Impact of Covid-19 “Challenges towards Peace Operations Training” Experiences from the OperationalRESTRICTED Fields 1 RESTRICTED AGENDA UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO 1. Mission Context 2. Covid-19 Context 3. Challenges towards Operations Training 4. How we dealt? 5. Major achievements/Lessons learnt RESTRICTED 2 MONUSCO MISSION CONTEXT UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO SC RESOLUTION 2502, Dec 2019 ✓ Protection of Civilians, UN Personnel, Installations, Equipments and freedom of movement of UN pers. ✓ Support and work with the authority of DRC. ✓ Neutralize armed groups. ✓ Monitor armed embargo. Mining: Encourage the setting-up of an effective national civilian structure to control the key mining activities. RESTRICTED 3 SECURITY SITUATION IN DRC UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO • Security Situation in DRC remains friable • The total Rebels and AG’s, MAI MAI Militia (active and inactive) - 153 • Currently active : 77 • However; MONUSCO is RAIYA MUTOMBOKI working diligently to ward off any impending threat. • Deployment in areas is also in concert with merger of MM SIMBA AGs DRC APCLS ADF RESTRICTED 4 ARMED GROUPS OVERVIEW UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO ITURI • CODECO factions (DJUGU territory) • FRPI (IRUMU territory) Dungu • ZAIRE (IRUMU territory) • FPIC IRUMU territory Ango FIB BOX • ADFs spill over effects (Irumu territory) • ADF (KAMANGO-MBAU and ERINGETI- • MM groups (MAMBASA) Bunia TCHABI Axis, BENI-KASINDI Axis) Kisangani • MM groups (MAMOVE, SOUTH of BENI) Beni NORTH-KIVUMbandaka Butembo Lubero • FDLR, Nyatura factions (MASISI/RUTSHURU), • NDC-R (BWIRA&GUIDON) (MASISI, WALIKALE, Rutshuru SOUTH KIVU RUTSHURU) Masisi • FNL, Red Tabara (UVIRA highlands) • MM groups – KIFUAFUA, KIRIKICHO, UPDC, Goma • CNSPC (FIZI area, spillover into MANIEMA and Bukavu Jackson, FPP/AP (LUBERO, BUTEMBO) Kindu TANGANYIKA province) • Others AGs:Bandundu APCLS, (MASISI/ RUTSHURU/ • NGUMINO Uvira • LUBERO) Bijombo BAFULIRU Groupment Kinshasa • RAIA MUTOMBOKI (SHABUNDA, BUNYAKIRI), Bendera • Nyatura and others (KALEHE area) • CNRD (KITINDIRO, ITOMBWE forest) Matadi Nyunzu Kananga Mbuji-Mayi Kalemie Tshikapa TANGANYIKA Lubumbashi • MM Yakutumba, Twa militias, MM Apa Na Pale and allies (KALEMIE, KABALO, BENDERA, KONGOLO, NYUNZU territories), RESTRICTED 5 COVID-19 CONTEXT UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO Unprecedent impact on conduct of General Guidelines issued by Operational Training and Troops Mission leadership “UN in DRC Evaluation owing to restrictions Covid-19 impact report” for and associated risk of pandemic mandate implementation Detailed guidelines issued at Innovation of methodology Mission level (IMTC) and UNHQ utilizing technology for level (DPO); Being implemented operational continuity to fulfill with full spectrum mission mandate RESTRICTED 6 CHALLENGES ON TRAINING UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO Reduction of training activities Adaptability to online methods, due to suspension of troop and increasing dependence on IUP rotations technology Social distancing rules: Impact Travel restrictions : Impact on on classroom training, practical supervision and evaluation by lessons and tactical exercises training staff Shortage of Personnel to train; Mandatory Quarantine: availability Non availability of time for of time for online conduct of training operational training activities RESTRICTED 7 HOW WE DEALT? UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO At Mission Level At Force Level • Operational motivation while • Resumption of Operational retaining essential safety activities with three basic measures to be maintained at principles:- all levels. • Protecting staff and limiting • Reversion from conventional their possible exposure to methods; to resume training pandemic. regime. • Preventing staff and their • Adaptability as per prevailing activities from being vector environment / safeguards. for COVID-19. • Online Training regime. • Maintaining business • Introduction of new formats to continuity for the key conduct induction training mandated tasks. (SIC). RESTRICTED 8 TRAINING REGIME UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO 3 PRINCIPLES PROTECTION ADAPTABILITY (AGAINST C-19) SELECTION INSTRUCTORS LECTURES PRESENCIAL CLASSES INDUCTEES CAPITAL LECTURES ONLINE CLASSES TRAINERS PDFs PRESENTATIONS PRACTICAL CLASSES TRAINEES (TCCs) RESTRICTED 9 EMPHASIS OF OP TRAINNG UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO CREATION of special CENTRALIZATION of control training teams (sectors and evaluation of training level) for conducting activities (MTC level) specific training DECENTRALIZATION of PRIORITIZATION of online special training activities training; Combination of (training on Force technology and manual protection, refreshers on defensive driving training) concept to accrue effects RESTRICTED 10 ADAPTATION: Major Cardinals UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO Induction Training for Contingent Training Other training IUPs Capsule for troops activities • Optimization of training • Training of nucleus staff • Online dissemination from 21 to 7 days of contingent - Master of Training material to • Self study in Quarantine trainers Contingents • Online training material • Supervision and • After Action Report • Important Lessons, held coordination by from contingents on in classroom post Training officer from completion of training quarantine FHQ activity • Classes held on MS • Conduct of classes on • If circumstances permit, teams and projected live MS teams on validation carried out by to students when requirement training staff of FHQ required • Live Projection of class • Practical tests/ lessons to the troops with conducted after presentation Quarantine • Adherence to Social distancing measures RESTRICTED 11 MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO Induction Course for • 210 IUPs trained and inducted over a period of 3 months with IUPs the new format Defensive Driving • Training Completed for first half of 2020 in decentralized option training • Training for second half in progress VIP Induction • 11 VIPs and Senior Officers Rules Of Engagement • Conducted online and monitored by MLA Training • Attendance: Sector Cdrs/Dys, Legal Advisors & Contingent Cdrs Force Protection • Decentralized Training for all contingents in progress Training Jungle Warfare • Training ongoing in conventional method for FIB troops Training RESTRICTED 12 BEST PRACTICES & LESSONS LEARNT UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO • Centralization (control and evaluation) VS Decentralization in terms of conduct: Offers flexibility in uncertain circumstances • Combination of training methods (online, classroom, live video and practical) • Implementation of precautionary measures against COVID 19 under all circumstances • Compartmentalize critical capabilities in Cluster mode ( aviation air crews, APC drivers…) • Establish quarantine camps for rotations, with tasks to maintain them. Include quarantine timelines in rotation planning RESTRICTED 13 KEY TAKE AWAYS UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO • New Normal - Working under COVID-19; All operational and training activities need to continue with same zeal under prevailing environment of COVID-19 • Be a positive influence; in order to protect health and reassure them safety spec to locals. Info Ops: public service messages, leaflets/handouts • Be the example: PPE, social distance, hygiene; Continue to provide training and security in the COVID environment: patrols, SCD, QRF, Engr tasks, etc. • Make best use of technology; as it will be effective tool for social distancing rules being followed; specially when the instructors are not available in situ • COVID is a reality of existing times; we have to live with it – no compromises on achieving our MISSION MANDATE RESTRICTED 14 UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION STABILIZATION MISSION IN THE CONGO Thank you RESTRICTED 15.
Recommended publications
  • Meas, Conservation and Conflict: a Case Study of Virunga National Park

    Meas, Conservation and Conflict: a Case Study of Virunga National Park

    © 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development MEAs, Conservation and Conflict The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, A case study of Virunga Nationalmeasurement Park, and DRCassessmen t, and natural resources management. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all— sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable Alec Crawford organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core Johannah Bernstein operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre October 2008 (IDRC) and Environment Canada; and from the Province of Manitoba. The institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the priate sector. International Institute for Sustainable Development 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel: +1 (204) 958–7700 Fax: +1 (204) 958–7710 © 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for MEAs, Conservation Sustainable Development and Conflict The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable A case study of Virunga development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic National Park, DRC policy, climate change, measurement and assessment, and natural resources management.
  • Ocha Drc Population Movements in Eastern Dr Congo October – December 2009

    Ocha Drc Population Movements in Eastern Dr Congo October – December 2009

    Population Movements in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo OCHA DRC POPULATION MOVEMENTS IN EASTERN DR CONGO OCTOBER – DECEMBER 2009 January 2010 1 Population Movements in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo 1. OVERVIEW The humanitarian situation and movement of populations in 2009 have been heavily influenced by military operations and the still prevailing insecurity in a number of areas in the eastern provinces. Between January 20 and February 25 2009, the Forces Armées de la République Démocratique du Congo (FARDC) and the Rwanda Defence Forces (RDF) conducted joint operations (Umoja Wetu) in North Kivu against the Forces Démocratiques pour le Liberation du Rwanda (FDLR). In March 2009 a second military operation (Kimia II) was launched in North Kivu and South Kivu. Lubero, Rutshuru, Masisi and Walikale are the territories in North Kivu where major displacements have been reported since March 2009. In South Kivu the most affected areas are Kalehe, Uvira and Shabunda. The attacks carried out by the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), a Ugandan militia, in the Orientale province since September 2008 have spread from the Haut Uele district to the Bas Uele in 2009. The population is victim of atrocities and acts of extreme violence: killings, rapes, kidnapping and looting leading to population displacements in many locations of the districts. N. IDPs per Province 800 000 767 399 730 941 700 000 600 000 Haut Uele 500 000 Bas Uele Ituri North Kivu 400 000 South Kivu Equateur 239 210 Katanga 300 000 165 472 200 000 58 937 60 000 100 000 14 000 0 Note: Ituri, Haut Uele and Bas Uele are districts of the Orientale province During the reporting period (October ‐ December 2009) some displacements have been reported in the Katanga province where about 14.000 people have moved from South Kivu due to the military operations in the area bordering Katanga.
  • Rwanda's Support to the March 23 Movement (M23)

    Rwanda's Support to the March 23 Movement (M23)

    Opinion Beyond the Single Story: Rwanda’s Support to the March 23 Movement (M23) Alphonse Muleefu* Introduction Since the news broke about the mutiny of some of the Congolese Armed Forces - Forces Armées de la République Démocratique du Congo (FARDC) in April 2012 and their subsequent creation of the March 23 Movement (M23), we have been consistently supplied with one story about the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). A story that puts much emphasis on allegations that the government of Rwanda and later to some lesser extent that of Uganda are supporting M23 against the government of the DRC. This narrative was reinforced when the UN Group of Experts for the DRC (GoE) issued an Addendum of 48 pages on June 25, 20121 making allegations similar to those already made in Human Rights Watch’s (HRW) report of June 3, 20122, that the government of Rwanda was providing direct support in terms of recruitment, encouraging desertion of FARDC soldiers, providing weapons, ammunitions, intelligence, political advice to the M23, violating measures concerning the freezing of assets and collaborating with certain individuals. In response, the government of Rwanda issued a 131-page rebuttal on July 27, 2012, in which it denied all allegations and challenged the evidence given in support of each claim.3 On November 15, 2012, the GoE submitted its previously leaked report in which, in addition to the allegations made earlier, it claimed that the effective commander of M23 is Gen. James Kabarebe, Rwanda’s Minister of Defence, and that the senior officials of the government of Uganda had provided troop reinforcements, supplied weapons, offered technical assistance, joint planning, political advice and external relations.4 The alleged support provided by Ugandan officials was described as “subtle but crucial”, and the evidence against Rwanda was described as “overwhelming and compelling”.
  • Executive Summary

    Executive Summary

    Monthly Protection Monitoring Report – North Kivu September 2015 Executive Summary 2845 incidents have been recorded in September 2015. The number has decreased by 6,3% compared to August 2015 pendant, when 3037 incidents were reported. The territory Incidents per territory of Rutshuru has had the BENI 369 highest LUBERO 369 number of MASISI 639 incidents in NYIRAGONGO 133 September RUTSHURU 919 2015 WALIKALE 416 TOTAL 2845 Incidents per Incidents per alleged perpetrator category of victim Nombre des cas par type d’incident The majority of incidents in September 2015 were violations to the right of property and liberty PROTECTION MONITORING PMS Province du Nord Kivu 2 | UNHCR Protection Monitoring Nor th K i v u – Sept. Monthly Report PROTECTION MONITORING PMS Province du Nord Kivu I. Summary of main protection concerns Throughout September 2015, the PMS has registered 59,8% less internal displacement than in August 2015. This decrease can be justified by the relative calm perceived in significant displacement areas. On 17 September 2015, alleged NDC Cheka members pillaged Kalehe village to the Northeast of Bunyatenge and kidnapped around 30 people that were forced to transport the stolen goods to Mwanza and Mutiri, in Lubero territory. II. Protection context by territory MASISI The security situation in Masisi was characterised by clashes between FARDC and FDLR, between two different factions of FDDH (FDDH/Tuombe and FDDH/Mugwete) and between FARDC and APCLS. These conflicts have led to the massive displacement of the population from the areas affected by fighting followed by looting, killings and other violations. In Bibwe, around 400 families were displaced, among which 72 households are staying in a church and a school in Bibwe and around 330 families created a new site, accessible by car, around 2km from the Bibwe site.
  • Of the United Nations Mission in the DRC / MONUC – MONUSCO

    Of the United Nations Mission in the DRC / MONUC – MONUSCO

    Assessing the of the United Nations Mission in the DRC / MONUC – MONUSCO REPORT 3/2019 Publisher: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Copyright: © Norwegian Institute of International Affairs 2019 ISBN: 978-82-7002-346-2 Any views expressed in this publication are those of the author. Tey should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Te text may not be re-published in part or in full without the permission of NUPI and the authors. Visiting address: C.J. Hambros plass 2d Address: P.O. Box 8159 Dep. NO-0033 Oslo, Norway Internet: effectivepeaceops.net | www.nupi.no E-mail: [email protected] Fax: [+ 47] 22 99 40 50 Tel: [+ 47] 22 99 40 00 Assessing the Efectiveness of the UN Missions in the DRC (MONUC-MONUSCO) Lead Author Dr Alexandra Novosseloff, International Peace Institute (IPI), New York and Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI), Oslo Co-authors Dr Adriana Erthal Abdenur, Igarapé Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Prof. Tomas Mandrup, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, and Royal Danish Defence College, Copenhagen Aaron Pangburn, Social Science Research Council (SSRC), New York Data Contributors Ryan Rappa and Paul von Chamier, Center on International Cooperation (CIC), New York University, New York EPON Series Editor Dr Cedric de Coning, NUPI External Reference Group Dr Tatiana Carayannis, SSRC, New York Lisa Sharland, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Canberra Dr Charles Hunt, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Australia Adam Day, Centre for Policy Research, UN University, New York Cover photo: UN Photo/Sylvain Liechti UN Photo/ Abel Kavanagh Contents Acknowledgements 5 Acronyms 7 Executive Summary 13 Te effectiveness of the UN Missions in the DRC across eight critical dimensions 14 Strategic and Operational Impact of the UN Missions in the DRC 18 Constraints and Challenges of the UN Missions in the DRC 18 Current Dilemmas 19 Introduction 21 Section 1.
  • UN Security Council, Children and Armed Conflict in the DRC, Report of the Secretary General, October

    UN Security Council, Children and Armed Conflict in the DRC, Report of the Secretary General, October

    United Nations S/2020/1030 Security Council Distr.: General 19 October 2020 Original: English Children and armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report, submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1612 (2005) and subsequent resolutions, is the seventh report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. It covers the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2020 and the information provided focuses on the six grave violations committed against children, the perpetrators thereof and the context in which the violations took place. The report sets out the trends and patterns of grave violations against children by all parties to the conflict and provides details on progress made in addressing grave violations against children, including through action plan implementation. The report concludes with a series of recommendations to end and prevent grave violations against children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and improve the protection of children. 20-13818 (E) 171120 *2013818* S/2020/1030 I. Introduction 1. The present report, submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 1612 (2005) and subsequent resolutions, is the seventh report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and covers the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2020. It contains information on the trends and patterns of grave violations against children since the previous report (S/2018/502) and an outline of the progress and challenges since the adoption by the Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict of its conclusions on children and armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in July 2018 (S/AC.51/2018/2).
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached

    This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached

    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Political Geography 28 (2009) 55–65 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Political Geography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/polgeo The silent encroachment of the frontier: A politics of transborder trade in the Semliki Valley (Congo–Uganda) Timothy Raeymaekers* Centre for Third World Studies, Conflict Research Group, University of Gent, Universiteitstraat 8, 9000 Gent, Belgium abstract Keywords: This article is about the frontier as a political place. Through a discussion of unofficial cross-border trade Border in the Semliki Valley (on the Congo–Ugandan border), it describes how people, despite the ruining effects Frontier of delocalization and state privatization, continue to reproduce their life worlds as places, which even- Conflict tually makes them the matrix of new political constellations. This silent encroachment of the Congo– Africa Ugandan frontier is marked in turn by a prolonged silent, and at occasions loud, advancement on existing Political economy power configurations that profoundly questions ruling modes of classification and standards of evalu- ation.
  • NORD KIVU | Octobre 2020

    NORD KIVU | Octobre 2020

    RAPPORT MENSUEL DE MONITORING DE PROTECTION NORD KIVU | Octobre 2020 Chiffres clés RÉSUME 1 391 violations 591 incidents Au cours de ce mois d’octobre 2020, 1.391 incidents de protection ont été documentés Tendances mensuelles sur l’ensemble de la Province du Nord-Kivu. Comparativement au mois de septembre 1,946 2020, il se dégage une diminution de 446 incidents de protection (32%). Malgré cette 1,834 1,667 1837 1391 diminution, plusieurs zones de conflit et incidents violents restent préoccupantes : Sur l’ensemble des incidents de protection qui ont été collectés au Nord-Kivu, la Juin Juillet Aout Sept Octobre majorité d’homicides (47%), d’incendies (57%) et de pillages (43%) ont été commis dans le territoire de Beni et principalement dans les zones de santé d’Oicha, Genre des victimes Mutwanga et Kyondo ainsi que dans la commune Beu. La situation sécuritaire dans ce Genres Total % territoire reste tendue à cause d’une succession d’attaques, embuscades incursions et incendies par des présumés éléments d’Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) contre les Hommes 1006 72% civils. Environ 28 civils ont été tué, 51 enlevés et 54 ont subis des coups et blessures. Femmes 327 24% Meme si le nombre total des violations dans le territoire a diminué dans le mois Garcons 30 2% d’octobre, le conflit est devenu plus meurtriers pendant les trois derniers mois. Filles 28 2% Total 1,391 Dans le territoire de Masisi, des éléments armés non étatiques actifs dans le groupement Bashali-Mokoto, contraignent depuis fin octobre les PDIs et les résidents Statut des victimes à céder de l’espace dans leurs habitations pour y installer les dépendants de ce groupe Statut Total % armé.
  • Understanding People's Resistance to Ebola Responses in The

    Understanding People's Resistance to Ebola Responses in The

    FROM BIOLEGITIMACY TO ANTIHUMANITARIANISM | MAY 2021 Photo by: Ernest Katembo Ngetha. From Biolegitimacy to Antihumanitarianism: Understanding People’s Resistance to Ebola Responses in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Aymar Nyenyezi Bisoka, Koen Vlassenroot, and Lucien Ramazani 8 Congo Research Briefs | Issue 8 FROM BIOLEGITIMACY TO ANTIHUMANITARIANISM: UNDERSTANDING PEOPLE’S RESISTANCE TO EBOLA RESPONSES IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO Aymar Nyenyezi Bisoka, Koen Vlassenroot, and Lucien Ramazani1 INTRODUCTION authorities and their ineffectiveness in providing security and creating The tenth outbreak of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in the Democratic lasting peace in areas hit by conflict. In such areas, people prioritize Republic of the Congo (DRC) officially started in August 2018 security above health provisions and feel abandoned by those they in the eastern province of North Kivu, leading the World Health expect to care about them. As one respondent told us, “we die more Organization (WHO), on July 17, 2019, to recognize it as a “public from war than from Ebola and no one cares about it.”4 The local health emergency of international concern.”2 At its formal conclusion population experienced the Ebola health crisis as an opportunity not on June 26, 2020, the pandemic had resulted in 3,470 reported to aim for better health care but to demand protection and peace. cases, including 2,287 deaths.3 Despite its devastating impact, local These observations tell us that, rather than accepting the health- populations seemed to be skeptical about the existence of the new care priorities of humanitarian interventions, people living in North pandemic. Consequently, the outbreak saw substantial and often Kivu saw the pandemic as a moment of struggle and resistance fierce local resistance to the medical response, including armed and mobilized to express their demands to a wide range of public attacks on Ebola treatment centers (ETCs) and violence toward authorities.
  • Virunga Landscape

    Virunga Landscape

    23. Virunga Landscape Th e Landscape in brief Coordinates: 1°1’29’’N – 1°44’21’’S – 28°56’11’’E – 30°5’2’’E. Area: 15,155 km2 Elevation: 680–5,119 m Terrestrial ecoregions: Ecoregion of the Afroalpine barrens of Ruwenzori-Virunga Ecoregion of the Afromontane forests of the Albertine Rift Ecoregion of the forest-savannah mosaic of Lake Victoria Aquatic ecoregions: Mountains of the Albertine Rift Lakes Kivu, Edward, George and Victoria Protected areas: Virunga National Park, DRC, 772,700 ha, 1925 Volcans National Park, Rwanda, 16,000 ha, 1925 Rutshuru Hunting Domain, 64,200 ha, 1946 added Bwindi-Impenetrable National Park situ- ated a short distance away from the volcanoes in southwest Uganda. Th is complex functions as a single ecosystem and many animals move across the borders, which permits restoration of the populations1. Physical environment Relief and altitude Th e Landscape is focused on the central trough of the Albertine Rift, occupied by Lake Figure 23.1. Map of Virunga Landscape (Sources: CARPE, Edward (916 m, 2,240 km²), and vast plains DFGFI, JRC, SRTM, WWF-EARPO). at an altitude of between 680 and 1,450 m. Its western edge stretches along the eastern bluff of Location and area the Mitumba Mountain Range forming the west- ern ridge of the rift. In the northeast, it includes he Virunga Landscape covers 15,155 km² the western bluff of the Ruwenzori horst (fault Tand includes two contiguous national parks, block) with its active glaciers, whose peak reaches Virunga National Park in DRC and Volcans a height of 5,119 m and whose very steep relief National Park in Rwanda, the Rutshuru Hunting comprises numerous old glacial valleys (Figure Zone and a 10 km-wide strip at the edge of the 23.2).
  • Report on Violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law by the Allied Democratic Forces Armed

    Report on Violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law by the Allied Democratic Forces Armed

    UNITED NATIONS JOINT HUMAN RIGHTS OFFICE OHCHR-MONUSCO Report on violations of human rights and international humanitarian law by the Allied Democratic Forces armed group and by members of the defense and security forces in Beni territory, North Kivu province and Irumu and Mambasa territories, Ituri province, between 1 January 2019 and 31 January 2020 July 2020 Table of contents Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Methodology and challenges encountered ............................................................................................ 7 II. Overview of the armed group Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) ................................................. 8 III. Context of the attacks in Beni territory ................................................................................................. 8 A. Evolution of the attacks from January 2015 to December 2018 .................................................. 8 B. Context of the attacks from 1 January 2019 and 31 January 2020 ............................................ 9 IV. Modus operandi............................................................................................................................................. 11 V. Human rights violations and abuses and violations of international humanitarian law . 11 A. By ADF combattants ..................................................................................................................................
  • Of 20 April 2015

    Of 20 April 2015

    L 102/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 21.4.2015 COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2015/614 of 20 April 2015 implementing Article 9(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of the Congo THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 of 18 July 2005 concerning restrictive measures directed against persons acting in violation of the arms embargo with regard to the Democratic Republic of Congo (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) On 18 July 2005, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005. (2) On 5 February 2015, the Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1533 (2004) concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo issued an updated list of individuals and entities subject to restrictive measures. (3) Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly, HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005 is replaced by the text appearing in the Annex to this Regulation. Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Luxembourg, 20 April 2015. For the Council The President F. MOGHERINI (1) OJ L 193, 23.7.2005, p.