DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 5. References

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Final EIS (July 2010) CHAPTER 5. REFERENCES Avis, J. 2007. Acetaminophen proves effective weapon against brown tree snakes. Kuam.com. Guam’s News Network. http://www.kuam.com/news/24582.aspx. (22 September 2007).Retrieved 2008-09-11. Bevacqua, Michael Lujan, PhD. 2010. ' Taotaomo’na (Taotaomona)', referenced May 17, 2010, © 2009 Guampedia™, URL: http://guampedia.com/taotaomona-taotaomona/ Bindoff, N.L. et al. 2007. Observations: Oceanic Climate Change and Sea Level. In: IPCC (2007). As cited in USEPA (2009b.). Burdick, D., V. Brown, J. Asher, M., Gawel, L. Goldman, A. Hall, et al. 2008. The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of Guam. Downloaded 7 October, 2009 http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/ecosystems/coralreef/coral2008/pdf/Guam.pdf. Bureau of Statistics and Plans. 2009. Final North and Central Guam Land Use Plan. Prepared by ICF International Plan Rite and Sablan Environmental. Prepared for Government of Guam Bureau of Statistics and Plans. March. California Department of Transportation, EPA, FHWA. 2005. Guidance for Preparers of Cumulative Impact Analysis Approach and Guidance. 30 June. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 2010. Memorandum for Heads of Federal Departments and Agencies from: Nancy H. Sutley, Chair, Council on Environmental Quality Subject: Draft NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas. 18 February. CEQ. 2010. Draft Guidance for NEPA Mitigation and Monitoring. Memorandum for heads of federal Departments and Agencies. From Navy Sutley, Chair CEQ. 18 February. CEQ. 2005. Guidance on the Consideration of Past Actions in Cumulative Effects Analysis. Memorandum dated June 24, 2005 http://www.nepa.gov/nepa/regs/Guidance_on_CE.pdf. CEQ. 1997. Environmental Justice Guidance under the National Environmental Policy Act. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/CEQ. Accessed on 17 June, 2009, last updated 10 December. Chief of Naval Operations (CNO). 2007. Memorandum for Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Fleet Readiness and Logistics (N4) Deputy Commandant of the Marine Corps (Installations and Logistics). 31May. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Department of Land and Natural Resources (CNMI DLNR). 2005. CNMI Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. September. CNMI and Guam. 2006. CNMI and Guam Stormwater Management Manual. Prepared by Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Volume I. April. Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Marianas Islands (COMNAV Marianas). 2000. COMNAVMARIANAS Instruction 3500.4. Marianas Training Handbook. Commander in Chief, U.S. Pacific Command Representative. Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. June. V OL UME 7: PROPOSED M ITIGATION M EASURES, 5-1 References PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES’ IMPACTS, AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Final EIS (July 2010) Department of Commerce (DoC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), Coastal Services Center (CSC). 2007. 2005 Era Guam Impervious Surface (GIS data). 16 November. Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Energy (DOE). 2010. Quadrennial Defense Review, Climate Change Support. http://www.ornl.gov/sci/knowledgediscovery/QDR/ and www.ornl.gov/sci/knowledgediscovery/QDR/guam/GuamAssessment.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2010. Department of the Interior (DOI). Office of Insular Affairs. 2009. Adaptive Management - The U.S. Department of Interior Technical Guide. http://www.doi.gov/initiatives/AdaptiveManagement/documents.html. Last updated 2009, Accessed 5 October 2009. DOI Office of Insular Affairs. 2007. “U.S. Territories”. 9 February. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 2003a. “Super Typhoon Pongsona: The First 100 Days Over $300 Million in Disaster Relief and Assistance”. FEMA. 2003b. Update on Recovery Efforts in Guam and Rota Following Super Typhoon Pongsona. 12 March 2003. Federal Highways Administration (FHWA). 2006. Detailed Monitoring Protocol for U.S. 95 Settlement Agreement. Battelle for FHWA. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/airtoxicmsat/airtoxmsat_toc.htm. Last updated 12 June 2006, Accessed 5 October 2009. FHWA. 2006. Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. January. Foote, K., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Tinian Monarch Rebounds; Species Removed from Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. http://www.fws.gov/news/NewsReleases/R1/21971033-65B8-D693-799D4FDD9EA43E04.html. Accessed 9 October 2009. Fosberg, F.R. 1960. The Vegetation of Micronesia. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin 119:1- 75. Fritts, T.H.; and D. Leasman-Tanner. 2001. The Brown Treesnake on Guam: How the arrival of one invasive species damaged the ecology, commerce, electrical systems, and human health on Guam: A comprehensive information source. U.S. Department of the Interior http://www.fort.usgs.gov/resources/education/bts/bts_home.asp. Gillespie, B., 2002. Hope Prevails Amid Complex Recovery in Guam. RedCross.org http://www.redcross.org/news/ds/hurricanes/021215pongsona.html. Global Security. 2005. Military: Tinian. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/tinian.htm. Last update 26 April 2005, Accessed 9 October 2009. GovGuam. 2008. The Guam Mapbook. Bureau of Statistics and Plans. January. V OL UME 7: PROPOSED M ITIGATION M EASURES, 5-2 References PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES’ IMPACTS, AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Final EIS (July 2010) Guam Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan Update (GCORP). 2006. Department of Parks and Recreation, Government of Guam. Prepared by Daniel D. Swavely Consulting Services, Tamuning, Guam. HDR Hawaii Pacific Engineers. 2008. Guam Solid Waste Utility Study for Proposed USMC Relocation. April. Hodgson, R. A. J., G. C Wall, J. W. Randles, 1998, Specific Identification of Coconut Tinangaja Viroid for Differential Field Diagnosis of Viroids in Coconut Palm, Phytopathology 88 (8): 774–781, doi:10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.8.774, http://www.apsnet.org/phyto/PDFS/1998/0527-01R.pdf. Holmes III, R. 2001. “Environmental Ethics in Micronesia, Past and Present, Part II — Guam Today: Still "on the Edge." Colonial Legacy and American Presence”. International Society for Environmental Ethics Newsletter 12 (3). http://www.cep.unt.edu/ISEE/n12-3-01.htm.Definitions of Insular Area Political Organizations." Office of Insular Affairs. Accessed 31 October 2008.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. As cited in USEPA (2009c). JGPO and NAVFAC Pacific. 2009. Guam Workforce Housing and Material Management. Presentation to Guam Industry Forum III. Karl, T.R., J.M. Melillo, and T.C. Peterson (eds). 2009. Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States: a state of knowledge report from the U.S. Global Change Research Program. New York, USA. Cambridge University Press. Kelly, J. J. Jr. (2003). Super Typhoon Pongsona Service Assessment. United States Department of Commerce. http://www.weather.gov/os/assessments/pdfs/Pongsona.pdf. Lander, J.F., L.S. Whiteside, and P. Hattori. 2002. Tsunami History of Guam: 1849-1993. Science of Tsunami Hazards 20: 158-174. Marine Forces Pacific. 2009. Training Concept Plan. April. Marland, G., T. Boden, R.J. Andres. 2008. Guam Emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_usa.html Accessed 11 March 2010. Mendiola, Tanya M. Champaco. 2010. ' Animism', referenced May 17, 2010, © 2009 Guampedia™, URL: http://guampedia.com/animism/ Moore, A. 2009. Guam Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle (CRB) Eradication Program Semi-annual Progress Report. University of Guam Cooperative Extension Service. May 10. NAVFAC Pacific. 1983. Final EIS for an Ammunition Wharf in Outer Apra Harbor. Prepared by VTN Pacific. 30 December. V OL UME 7: PROPOSED M ITIGATION M EASURES, 5-3 References PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES’ IMPACTS, AND CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Final EIS (July 2010) NAVFAC Pacific. 2005. Marine Resource Assessment for the Marianas Operating Area. Pacific Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Prepared for Navy, Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet (COMPACFLT) by Geo-Marine, Inc. August. NAVFAC Pacific. 2006. Sediment Characterization Study for Construction Dredging Feasibility Study at Charlie, Sierra and SRF Wharves, Apra Harbor, Guam. Final Report. Prepared by Weston Solutions. NAVFAC Pacific. 2007. Memorandum for Deputy Chief of Naval Operations Fleet Readiness and Logistics (N4) Deputy Commandant of the Marine Corps (Installations and Logistics) Policy Guidance for Environmental Planning Mitigation Composition, Monitoring and Tracking. 3 May. NAVFAC Pacific. 2008. Guam Water Utility Study Report, Pre-Final Draft. February. NAVFAC Pacific. 2008b. Guam Joint Military Master Plan, Revision 5. Prepared by TEC JV. September. NAVFAC Pacific. 2010. Personal Communication: email. Melvyn Takahara (NAVFAC PAC) to Garrett Fong (NAVFAC PAC). RE: Guam, sea level. 19 February . DoN. 2010. Final Mariana Islands Range Complex Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement. 2 Volumes. Prepared for Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet, Honolulu, Hawaii. May. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). 2003. Event Report for Typhoon Pongsona. http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~484791.
Recommended publications
  • Political Geography

    Political Geography

    Provided for non-commercial research and education use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. Volume 17 Number e&tgusc 2008 ISSN 0962-0293 Political Geography Available online at **? Science Direct www.sciancedirecl.com This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier's archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Political _^ -2 Geography ELSEVIER Political Geography 27 (2008) 630-651 www.elsevier.com/locate/polgeo Inscribing empire: Guam and the War in the Pacific National Historical Park R.D.K. Herman* Research Unit, Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA Abstract National parks form an archipelago of government-run, on-site "museums," geographic sites of territorial and rhetorical nation-building. The War in the Pacific National Historical Park, which occupies seven parcels of land on the small island of Guam, celebrates the "freedom" that the U.S. brought to the region in World War II. But in fact, this landscape sits at the nexus of several contested territories. Guam was seized in the 1898 Spanish—American War—the final wave of American territorial expansion—and experienced 50 years of dictatorship under the U.S.
  • Guam Country Profile

    Guam Country Profile

    1 SOPAC country profile, GU OurOur VisionVision The improved health, well being and safety of the Pacific and its peoples The South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission (SOPAC) is an independent, intergovernmental, regional organisation established by South Pacific nations in 1972, and dedicated to providing geotechnical services to the countries it serves. Its Secretariat is located in Suva, Fiji, and has about 40 professional and support staff. SOPAC’s work for its member countries focusses on three key areas; resource development; environmental geoscience; and national capacity development in the geosciences. To effectively deliver these services SOPAC maintains a regional data centre, provides information services, and offers technical and field services for specific project work. THIS COUNTRY PROFILE WAS PRODUCED TO PROVIDE A SNAPSHOT OF THE CURRENT ISSUES FACED BY THE COUNTRY AND SOPAC’S ROLE IN ASSISTING COUNTRIES TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2 SOPAC country profile, GU Guam : Our Future The territory is determined to find a sustainable development approach that will help foster greater economic opportunities without adversely affecting the cultural, environmental, social and natural resources. ... to fully realize this goal, all development in Guam has been guided by a Comprehensive Development Plan reflecting the goals and objectives of its people. Government of Guam. (1996) Capital: Agana Population: 149 600 (1999 est.) Land Area: 541 sq. km Max. Height above Sea-level: 406 m (Mt Lamlam) Geography: one large island; peak
  • Proceedings of Spie

    Proceedings of Spie

    PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE SPIEDigitalLibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie Using WorldView-2 to determine bottom-type and bathymetry Krista R. Lee, Angela M. Kim, R. C. Olsen, Fred A. Kruse Krista R. Lee, Angela M. Kim, R. C. Olsen, Fred A. Kruse, "Using WorldView-2 to determine bottom-type and bathymetry," Proc. SPIE 8030, Ocean Sensing and Monitoring III, 80300D (4 May 2011); doi: 10.1117/12.883578 Event: SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing, 2011, Orlando, Florida, United States Downloaded From: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie on 14 Mar 2019 Terms of Use: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/terms-of-use Using WorldView-2 to determine bottom-type and bathymetry Krista R. Lee*, Angela M. Kim, R. C. Olsen, Fred A. Kruse Naval Postgraduate School, Remote Sensing Center, 1 University Way, Monterey, CA, USA 93943 ABSTRACT Observations taken from DigitalGlobe’s WorldView-2 (WV-2) sensor were analyzed for bottom-type and bathymetry for data taken at Guam and Tinian in late February and early March of 2010. Classification of bottom type was done using supervised and unsupervised classification techniques. All eight of the multispectral bands were used. The supervised classification worked well based on ground truth collected on site. Bathymetric analysis was done using LiDAR-derived bathymetry in comparison with the multispectral imagery (MSI) data. The Red Edge (705-745 nm) band was used to correct for glint and general surface reflectance in the Blue (450-510 nm), Green (510-580 nm), and Yellow (585-625 nm) bands. For the Guam beach analyzed here, it was determined that the Green and Yellow bands were most effective for determining depth between 2.5 and 20 m.
  • Guam, Where America's Colonization Begins

    Guam, Where America's Colonization Begins

    Master Thesis | Guam, Where America´s Colonization Begins | by Timon Verschoor | August 2011 Guam, Where America’s Colonization Begins Cultural Heritage, Identity and the Perception of the Chamorros Timon Verschoor Augustus 2011 - 2 - Master Thesis | Guam, Where America´s Colonization Begins | by Timon Verschoor | August 2011 Guam, Where America´s Colonization Begins Cultural Heritage, Identity and the Perception of the Chamorros This thesis is submitted to the University of Utrecht in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, Cultural Anthropology. Name: Timon Verschoor Student number: 3460657 Supervisor: Drs. Lotje Brouwer Institution: University of Utrecht, the Netherlands Date: August 2011 Contact details: [email protected] Photograph front: By author - 2 - Master Thesis | Guam, Where America´s Colonization Begins | by Timon Verschoor | August 2011 “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights […]” (The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations 1947, art. 1) - 3 - Master Thesis | Guam, Where America´s Colonization Begins | by Timon Verschoor | August 2011 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 5 Prologue ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Geography of Guam .....................................................................................................................
  • Volume 6: Related Actions-Utilities and Roadway Projects EIS/OEIS

    Volume 6: Related Actions-Utilities and Roadway Projects EIS/OEIS

    Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009) CHAPTER 11. RECREATIONAL RESOURCES 11.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter discusses potential environmental consequences associated with implementation of the alternatives within the region of influence (ROI) for each resource. A description of the affected environment for each resource is provided in Volume 2 (Marine Corps Relocation – Guam). The locations described in Volume 2 include the ROI for the utilities and roadway projects with the chapters presented in the same order as in this volume. 11.2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 11.2.1 Approach to Analysis 11.2.1.1 Methodology Utilities Information on recreational resources on Guam and public access was collected through stakeholder meetings in April 2007, Geographic Information System data compiled and reviewed for this Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) literature review, personal communications, and limited visitor data that are available for a few specific locations on the island. A comprehensive recreational carrying capacity analysis—assessing the number of individuals who can be supported in a given area within natural resource limits without degrading the natural social, cultural, and economic environment (Global Development Research Center 2008)—was not conducted as part of this EIS/OEIS. Existing baseline data for conducting recreational resource impact analyses are somewhat limited because the Government of Guam, Department of Parks and Recreation does not collect visitor data (e.g. user counts, visitor satisfaction, user conflicts, visitor demands, etc.) for its recreational facilities (Personal obtained through site reconnaissance and communications with natural resource planners at AFB and park rangers at National Park Service.
  • Chapter 11. Recreational Resources

    Chapter 11. Recreational Resources

    Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Final EIS (July 2010) CHAPTER 11. RECREATIONAL RESOURCES 11.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter discusses potential environmental consequences associated with implementing the alternatives within the region of influence for each resource. A description of the affected environment for each resource is provided in Volume 2. The locations described in Volume 2 include the region of influence for the utilities and roadway projects with the chapters presented in the same order as in Volume 6. 11.2 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES 11.2.1 Approach to Analysis 11.2.1.1 Methodology Utilities Information on recreational resources on Guam and public access was collected through stakeholder meetings in April 2007, Geographic Information System data compiled and reviewed for this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) literature review, personal communications, and limited visitor data that are available for a few specific locations on the island. A comprehensive recreational carrying capacity analysis—assessing the number of individuals who can be supported in a given area within natural resource limits without degrading the natural social, cultural, and economic environment (Global Development Research Center 2008)—was not conducted as part of this EIS, but is suggested as a mitigation measure to better quantify potential impacts on recreational resources. Existing baseline data for conducting recreational resource impact analyses are somewhat limited because the Guam Department of Parks and Recreation (GDPR) does not collect visitor data (e.g., user counts, visitor satisfaction, user conflicts, visitor demands, and etc.) for its recreational facilities (GDPR 2009). Consequently, the analysis in this chapter relied considerably on information obtained through site reconnaissance and communications with natural resource planners at Andersen Air Force Base (AFB).
  • Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site, Apra Harbor, Guam: Final Report

    Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site, Apra Harbor, Guam: Final Report

    Architect-Engineering Services for Environmental Engineering Services at Various Navy and Marine Corps Activities, Pacific Basin and Indian Ocean Areas Contract No. N62742-05-D-1873 Amendment 11 Task Order No. 0009 Ocean Current Study Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site Apra Harbor, Guam Final Report Prepared For: Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-3134 August 2007 Ocean Current Study Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site Apra Harbor, Guam Final Report Prepared For: Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command Pacific 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 Pearl Harbor, Hawaii 96860-3134 Prepared By: Weston Solutions, Inc. 2433 Impala Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 Under Contract To: Belt Collins Hawaii Ltd. 2153 North King Street, Suite 200 Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 August 2007 Final Report Ocean Current Study Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site, Apra Harbor, Guam August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Area .............................................................................................................. 2 2.0 NAVY COASTAL OCEAN MODEL (NCOM)...............................................................
  • Appendix E. Background Information for Proposed Action

    Appendix E. Background Information for Proposed Action

    Guam and CNMI Military Relocation (2012 Roadmap Adjustments) SEIS Final July 2015 Appendix E Background Information for Proposed Action and Alternatives 1. Information Report. Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Live-Fire Training Range Complex on Guam (February 9, 2012) ................................................................................... E-1 2. Technical Report. Guam Live-Fire Training Range Alternatives in Consideration of Probabilistic Methodology Modeling (March 2012) ........................................................................ E-13 9 February 2012 INFORMATION REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT LIVE-FIRE TRAINING RANGE COMPLEX ON GUAM Purpose The purpose of this Information Report (IR) is to discuss the Department of Navy’s (Navy) decision to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the proposed construction and operation of a live-fire training range complex on Guam. This report provides information to assist the public during the SEIS scoping process. The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Guam and CNMI Military Relocation, Relocating Marines from Okinawa, Visiting Aircraft Carrier Berthing and Army Air And Missile Defense Task Force was published in July 2010 and the subsequent Record of Decision (ROD) was issued in September 2010. The Navy is proposing to reexamine alternative locations for a live-fire training range complex on Guam in an SEIS prior to making a decision on the location of the training range complex. What is an Environmental Impact Statement and why is an SEIS being prepared? NEPA established the requirement for federal agencies to consider and compare the impacts to the natural and human environment from their proposed actions, as well as reasonable alternatives to their actions. If the federal agency determines that the proposed action may have a significant impact on the environment, it must prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
  • VOLUME 7: MITIGATION, SUMMARY IMPACTS, CUMULATIVE 5-1 References Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009)

    VOLUME 7: MITIGATION, SUMMARY IMPACTS, CUMULATIVE 5-1 References Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009)

    Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009) CHAPTER 5. REFERENCES Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment (AFCEE). 2005. U.S. Air Force Air Conformity Applicability Model (Version 4.3). December. Avis, J. 2007. Acetaminophen proves effective weapon against brown tree snakes. Kuam.com. Guam's News Network. http://www.kuam.com/news/24582.aspx. (22 September 2007).Retrieved 2008-09-11. Barrett Consulting Group. 1991. Final Engineering Report, Groundwater in Northern Guam, Sustainable Yield and Groundwater Development. Prepared in association with Mink, J. F., 30 December 1991. Burdick, D., V. Brown, J. Asher, M., Gawel, L. Goldman, A. Hall, et al. 2008. The State of Coral Reef Ecosystems of Guam. Downloaded October 7, 2009 http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/ecosystems/coralreef/coral2008/pdf/Guam.pdf. Bureau of Statistics and Plans. 2009. Final North and Central Guam Land Use Plan. Prepared by ICF International Plan Rite and Sablan Environmental. Prepared for Government of Guam Bureau of Statistics and Plans. March. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Department of Land and Natural Resources (CNMI DLNR). 2005. CNMI Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy. September. Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Marianas Islands (COMNAV Marianas). 2000. COMNAVMARIANAS Instruction 3500.4. Marianas Training Handbook. Commander in Chief, U.S. Pacific Command Representative. Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. June. COMNAV Marianas. 2007. Guam Submerged Lands Management Plan. Prepared for Mariana Islands Commander, Navy Region Marianas by TEC Inc. COMNAV Marianas. 2007b. Final Environmental Impact Statement Kilo Wharf Extension, MILCON P- 502, Apra Harbor Naval Complex, Guam. September. Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ).
  • The Guam Department of Labor Shows That There Are 61,930 Jobs on Guam, Representing a Slight Decline from 62,200 Jobs One Year Ago

    The Guam Department of Labor Shows That There Are 61,930 Jobs on Guam, Representing a Slight Decline from 62,200 Jobs One Year Ago

    This document was funded under Investment Grant Award Number 07 69 06320 awarded by the United States Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration. The information, points of view and opinions contained in this document are those of the author and do not represent the official position or policies of the United States Economic Development Administration. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 6 General Overview .................................................................................................................... 6 Key Findings ............................................................................................................................ 7 Proposed Projects .....................................................................................................................9 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 12 A. ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING ................................................................................12 B. THE PLANNING PROCESS .............................................................................................12 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ..........................................................................................................
  • Guam and CNMI Military Relocation EIS/OEIS Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts

    Guam and CNMI Military Relocation EIS/OEIS Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts

    Draft Environmental Impact Statement / Overseas Environmental Impact Statement GUAM AND CNMI MILITARY RELOCATION Relocating Marines from Okinawa, Visiting Aircraft Carrier Berthing, and Army Air and Missile Defense Task Force Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts November 2009 Comments may be submitted to: Joint Guam Program Office c/o Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Pacific Attn: Guam Program Management Office 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 Pearl Harbor, HI 96860 This Page Intentionally Left Blank. Guam and CNMI Military Relocation Draft EIS/OEIS (November 2009) Guam and CNMI Military Relocation EIS/OEIS Volume 7: Potential Mitigation, Preferred Alternatives’ Impacts, and Cumulative Impacts Table of Contents CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.1 Geographic Boundary................................................................................................ 1-2 1.1.2 Guam Preferred Alternatives ..................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.3 Tinian Preferred Alternative ...................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 NO ACTION ............................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.3
  • Guam and Micronesia Reference Sources. REPORT NO ISSN-0387-4745 PUB DATE Jan 93 NOTE 21P

    Guam and Micronesia Reference Sources. REPORT NO ISSN-0387-4745 PUB DATE Jan 93 NOTE 21P

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 392 684 SO 025 798 AUTHOR Goetzfridt, Nicholas J.; Goniwiecha, Mark C. TITLE Guam and Micronesia Reference Sources. REPORT NO ISSN-0387-4745 PUB DATE Jan 93 NOTE 21p. AVAILABLE FROM Pacific Society, Tokyo Apt. 3rd floor, 4-15-29, Mita, Minato-ku, Toyko 108, Japan ($20 US). PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) Journal Articles (080) JOURNAL CIT Journal of the Pacific Society; v15 n4 p9-28 Jan 1993 EDRS PRICE MFOI/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; Foreign Countries; *Foreign Culture; *Geography; *International Studies; Multicultural Education; Printed Materials; Reference Materials; *Regional Characteristics; Resource Materials; Resources IDENTIFIERS *Guam; *Micronesia ABSTRACT This article lists reference sources for studying Guam and Micronesia. The entries are arranged alphabetically by main entry within each section in the categories of:(1) bibliographical works;(2) travel and guide books;(3) handbooks and surveys; (4) dictionaries;(5) yearbooks;(6) periodical and newspaper publications; and (7) audiovisual resources. Each entry gives complete bibliographical reference information. The works listed here fill what would otherwise be a significant bibliographic gap and help to define the rich cultural heritage in a part of the Pacific Ocean increasingly affected by the pressures of a shrinking world. (EH) ******************Y:**************--****.%::**,%;:***************.**::* * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * from the original document. *****************************************i ' *:,::**************** rairn.il of The Pacific S iet dl 1993 ,Nit 57 ( \ ol15,Na 1 ) 9 ) 118 1 1 REFERENCE SOURCES By Nkholas J. Goetzfridt * U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION PERMISSION TO REPRODUCETHIS EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION M,ATERIAL HAS BE N GRANTEDBY CENTER tERIC) YRThis document has been reproduced as and received from the person or organitation 1±-At 1 originating If 0 Minor changes have been made to Mark C.