DOCSLIB.ORG

Operation Inherent Resolve Report/Operation Pacific Eagle-Philippines, Report to the United States Congress, January 1, 2018-Mar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operation Inherent Resolve Report/Operation Pacific Eagle-Philippines, Report to the United States Congress, January 1, 2018-Mar LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL I REPORT TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE OPERATION PACIFIC EAGLE–PHILIPPINES JANUARY 1, 2018‒MARCH 31, 2018 LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL MISSION The Lead Inspector General for Overseas Contingency Operations coordinates among the Inspectors General specified under the law to: • Develop a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight over all aspects of the contingency operation. • Ensure independent and effective oversight of all programs and operations of the Federal Government in support of the contingency operation through either joint or individual audits, inspections, and investigations. • Promote economy, efficiency, and effectiveness and prevent, detect, and deter fraud, waste, and abuse. • Perform analyses to ascertain the accuracy of information provided by Federal agencies relating to obligations and expenditures, costs of programs and projects, accountability of funds, and the award and execution of major contracts, grants, and agreements. • Report quarterly and biannually to the Congress and the public on the contingency operation and activities of the Lead Inspector General. (Pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978) FOREWORD We are pleased to submit the Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) quarterly report to the U.S. Congress on Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) and Operation Pacific Eagle- Philippines (OPE-P). This is our 13th quarterly report on OIR and 2nd quarterly report on OPE-P, discharging our individual and collective agency oversight responsibilities pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978. The United States launched OIR at the end of 2014 to militarily defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in the Combined Joint Area of Operations in order to enable whole-of-governmental actions to increase regional stability. The strategy to defeat ISIS includes military operations, as well as support for local security forces, diplomacy, governance, and stabilization programs. This report aligns information on the status of OIR according to the five strategic oversight areas—security, governance, humanitarian assistance, stabilization, and support to mission— adopted by the Lead IG agencies to structure their oversight. Designated a contingency operation in 2017, OPE-P supports the Philippine government in its efforts to isolate, degrade, and defeat ISIS affiliates and other terrorist organizations in the Philippines. The report provides an update on the status of counterterrorism operations and humanitarian assistance related to OPE-P. We include OPE-P in this report because it relates to the same broader counter-ISIS mission as OIR. This report also discusses the oversight work conducted by the Lead IG Offices of the Inspector General and our partner oversight agencies, as well as ongoing and planned oversight work, for the second quarter of Fiscal Year 2018, ending March 31, 2018. Working in close collaboration, we remain committed to providing comprehensive oversight and timely reporting on these contingency operations. Glenn A. Fine Steve A. Linick Ann Calvaresi Barr Principal Deputy Inspector Inspector General Inspector General General Performing the Duties U.S. Department of State U.S. Agency for International of the Inspector General and the Broadcasting Development U.S. Department of Defense Board of Governors On the Cover (Top row) A U.S. Air Force F-22 prepares to receive fuel from a KC-10 Extender over Syria. (U.S. Air Force photo); Recovered firearms from local terrorists inspected by some cabinet secretaries in Marawi. (Philippines Presidential Communications Operations Office photo); The United Kingdom Bridge Training Team advises and assists Iraqi Security Forces in construction of a bridge over the Tigris River in Mosul. (U.S. Army photo); A young boy smiles, cheers and flashes a “V” for victory sign during a school break in Raqqah, Syria. (U.S. Army photo). (Bottom row): Iraqi Army soldiers practice drill and ceremony movements in Baghdad, Iraq. (U.S. Army photo). MESSAGE FROM THE LEAD INSPECTOR GENERAL I am pleased to present this quarterly report on the status of two overseas contingency operations: Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) and Operation Pacific Eagle—Philippines (OPE-P). This report summarizes the quarter’s events for both operations and describes completed, ongoing, and planned Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) and partner agency oversight work related to OIR and OPE-P activities. During the quarter, U.S.-supported Iraqi Security Forces drove ISIS out of most of the physical territory it held in Iraq. ISIS also lost ground in Syria. Despite its territorial losses in Iraq and Syria, however, ISIS retained the ability to carry out attacks in both countries. In addition, U.S. officials warned that with the decline of ISIS, Iran’s increasing Glenn A. Fine influence in Iraq, through its support of Shia militias within the Popular Mobilization Forces, could disrupt stabilization efforts and could also complicate efforts to hold free and fair parliamentary elections that are set for May 2018. A critical challenge to holding elections as scheduled is ensuring that the more than 2 million internally displaced people can get to the polls. The Turkish invasion of the Kurdish enclave of Afrin in northwestern Syria resulted in what DoD officials described as an “operational pause” in the effort to defeat ISIS. Many Kurdish members of the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces halted fighting ISIS in northeastern Syria to assist their Kurdish brethren in Afrin. Overall, the future of U.S. military, stabilization, and humanitarian operations in Syria remains challenging and uncertain. This quarter, the Lead IG agencies and our oversight partners issued six reports related to OIR. We have issued reports on the Syria Train and Equip Fund, contract management and administration issues at the DoD and DoS, and DoD funding for Operations and Maintenance requirements. Investigators from the Lead IG agencies and their partner agencies coordinated on 84 open investigations involving procurement fraud, corruption, grant fraud, theft, program irregularities, cyber intrusions, and trafficking in persons allegations. My Lead IG colleagues and I remain committed to oversight of both OIR and OPE-P. We thank the dedicated employees of each Lead IG agency who conduct this important work, both here in the United States and abroad. Glenn A. Fine Principal Deputy Inspector General Performing the Duties of Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Iraqi Army soldiers practice drill and ceremony movements in Baghdad, Iraq. (U.S. Army photo) CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES................................1 COMPLETED OIR OVERSIGHT OIR and Other Activities in Iraq and Syria ........... 1 ACTIVITIES ..........................................................59 Operation Pacific Eagle-Philippines .................. 11 Lead IG Staffing .................................................. 60 Outreach ............................................................. 60 OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE ...........13 Completed Audit, Inspection, Security .............................................................. 14 and Evaluation Reports for OIR ......................... 62 Governance and Civil Society ............................ 34 Investigations ..................................................... 67 Humanitarian Assistance ................................... 39 Hotline Activity ................................................... 70 Stabilization ....................................................... 47 Support to Mission ............................................. 51 ONGOING AND PLANNED Philippine Counterterror Operations OIR OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES ......................73 on Mindanao This Quarter ............................... 103 Humanitarian Assistance ................................. 104 Strategic Planning .............................................. 74 Oversight of OPE-P ........................................... 107 Ongoing Oversight Activities for OIR ................. 77 Planned Oversight Activities for OIR ................. 86 APPENDICES ....................................................109 OPERATION PACIFIC EAGLE- Acronyms and Definitions ................................ 115 PHILIPPINES ......................................................91 Maps.................................................................. 116 Endnotes ����������������������������������������������������������� 119 The OPE-P Mission ............................................. 93 ISIS-P After Marawi ............................................. 98 EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES ABOUT THIS REPORT This report is issued pursuant to sections 2, 4, and 8L of the Inspector General Act of 1978, which require that the designated Lead Inspector General (Lead IG) provide a quarterly report, available to the public, on each overseas contingency operation (OCO). The Department of Defense (DoD) IG is the designated Lead IG for Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) and Operation Pacific Eagle— Philippines (OPE-P). The Department of State (DoS) IG is the Associate Inspector General for OIR and OPE-P. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) IG also participates in oversight for both operations. The Offices of Inspector General of DoD, DoS, and USAID are referred to here as the Lead IG agencies. Other partner agencies also contribute to this oversight. This report covers both operations for the period from January
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basra: Strategic Dilemmas and Force Options
    CASE STUDY NO. 8 COMPLEX OPERATIONS CASE STUDIES SERIES Basra: Strategic Dilemmas and Force Options John Hodgson The Pennsylvania State University KAREN GUTTIERI SERIES EDITOR Naval Postgraduate School COMPLEX OPERATIONS CASE STUDIES SERIES Complex operations encompass stability, security, transition and recon- struction, and counterinsurgency operations and operations consisting of irregular warfare (United States Public Law No 417, 2008). Stability opera- tions frameworks engage many disciplines to achieve their goals, including establishment of safe and secure environments, the rule of law, social well- being, stable governance, and sustainable economy. A comprehensive approach to complex operations involves many elements—governmental and nongovernmental, public and private—of the international community or a “whole of community” effort, as well as engagement by many different components of government agencies, or a “whole of government” approach. Taking note of these requirements, a number of studies called for incentives to grow the field of capable scholars and practitioners, and the development of resources for educators, students and practitioners. A 2008 United States Institute of Peace study titled “Sharing the Space” specifically noted the need for case studies and lessons. Gabriel Marcella and Stephen Fought argued for a case-based approach to teaching complex operations in the pages of Joint Forces Quarterly, noting “Case studies force students into the problem; they put a face on history and bring life to theory.” We developed
    [Show full text]
  • Jihadism in Africa Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber (Eds.) Jihadism in Africa Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances RP 5 June 2015 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2015 SWP Research Papers are peer reviewed by senior researchers and the execu- tive board of the Institute. They express exclusively the personal views of the authors. SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3­4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by Meredith Dale (Updated English version of SWP-Studie 7/2015) Table of Contents 5 Problems and Recommendations 7 Jihadism in Africa: An Introduction Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 13 Al-Shabaab: Youth without God Annette Weber 31 Libya: A Jihadist Growth Market Wolfram Lacher 51 Going “Glocal”: Jihadism in Algeria and Tunisia Isabelle Werenfels 69 Spreading Local Roots: AQIM and Its Offshoots in the Sahara Wolfram Lacher and Guido Steinberg 85 Boko Haram: Threat to Nigeria and Its Northern Neighbours Moritz Hütte, Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 99 Conclusions and Recommendations Guido Steinberg and Annette Weber 103 Appendix 103 Abbreviations 104 The Authors Problems and Recommendations Jihadism in Africa: Local Causes, Regional Expansion, International Alliances The transnational terrorism of the twenty-first century feeds on local and regional conflicts, without which most terrorist groups would never have appeared in the first place. That is the case in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Syria and Iraq, as well as in North and West Africa and the Horn of Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Iraq's Kirkuk
    INSTITUT KURDDE PARIS E Information and liaison bulletin N° 392 NOVEMBER 2017 The publication of this Bulletin enjoys a subsidy from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Ministry of Culture This bulletin is issued in French and English Price per issue : France: 6 € — Abroad : 7,5 € Annual subscribtion (12 issues) France : 60 € — Elsewhere : 75 € Monthly review Directeur de la publication : Mohamad HASSAN Misen en page et maquette : Ṣerefettin ISBN 0761 1285 INSTITUT KURDE, 106, rue La Fayette - 75010 PARIS Tel. : 01-48 24 64 64 - Fax : 01-48 24 64 66 www.fikp.org E-mail: bulletin@fikp.org Information and liaison bulletin Kurdish Institute of Paris Bulletin N° 392 November 2017 • ROJAVA: PREPARING MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE • TURKEY: THE REPRESSION EXPANDS TO LIBER- AL CIRCLES; THE VIOLENCE IS INCREASING • IRAQI KURDISTAN: UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEMANDS FROM BAGHDAD, ARABISATION OF KIRKUK RESTARTED ROJAVA: PREPARING MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE. broad the “World Day for beginning to return to Raqqa, liber- the 17th with a suicide attack on a Kobani” was celebrated ated on 17th October. Regarding checkpoint that caused at least 35 on 1st November largely Deir Ezzor, the SDF fighters from victims in the Northeast of Deir as a symbol of this Syrian the “Jezirah Storm” operation, Ezzor Province, between the hydro- A Kurdish town’s unremit- launched on 9th September, liberated carbon fields of Conoco and Jafra. It ting resistance to the attack 7 villages near the town and about was, nevertheless, not able to pre- launched by ISIS in 2014 with fifteen km from the Iraqi borders, vent the SDF from reaching the Iraqi Turkish connivance.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria's Boko Haram
    Nigeria’s Boko Haram: Frequently Asked Questions Lauren Ploch Blanchard Specialist in African Affairs March 29, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43558 Nigeria’s Boko Haram: Frequently Asked Questions Summary Boko Haram, a violent Nigerian Islamist movement, has grown increasingly active and deadly in its attacks against state and civilian targets in recent years, drawing on a narrative of victimization and vengeance for state abuses to elicit recruits and sympathizers. The group’s April 2014 abduction of almost 300 schoolgirls drew particular international attention, including from the Obama Administration and Members of Congress. Its high death toll and its pledge of allegiance to the Islamic State (IS, also known as ISIL or ISIS) in March 2015 have further raised the concern of U.S. policy makers. The group has sought to rebrand itself as the Islamic State’s West Africa Province (ISWAP), though it remains more popularly known by its original nickname. The State Department has named several individuals linked to Boko Haram, including its leader, Abubakar Shekau, as Specially Designated Global Terrorists, and the group was designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) by the State Department in November 2013. More than 15,000 people are estimated to have been killed by Boko Haram, including more than 6,000 in 2015 alone, making it one of world’s deadliest terrorist groups. By U.N. estimates, roughly 2.8 million people have been displaced by Boko Haram-related violence in the Lake Chad Basin region, where approximately 5.6 million are in need of emergency food aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    Viewpoints No. 99 Mission Impossible? Triangulating U.S.- Turkish Relations with Syria’s Kurds Amberin Zaman Public Policy Fellow, Woodrow Wilson Center; Columnist, Diken.com.tr and Al-Monitor Pulse of the Middle East April 2016 The United States is trying to address Turkish concerns over its alliance with a Syrian Kurdish militia against the Islamic State. Striking a balance between a key NATO ally and a non-state actor is growing more and more difficult. Middle East Program ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ On April 7 Syrian opposition rebels backed by airpower from the U.S.-led Coalition against the Islamic State (ISIS) declared that they had wrested Al Rai, a strategic hub on the Turkish border from the jihadists. They hailed their victory as the harbinger of a new era of rebel cooperation with the United States against ISIS in the 98-kilometer strip of territory bordering Turkey that remains under the jihadists’ control. Their euphoria proved short-lived: On April 11 it emerged that ISIS had regained control of Al Rai and the rest of the areas the rebels had conquered in the past week. Details of what happened remain sketchy because poor weather conditions marred visibility. But it was still enough for Coalition officials to describe the reversal as a “total collapse.” The Al Rai fiasco is more than just a battleground defeat against the jihadists. It’s a further example of how Turkey’s conflicting goals with Washington are hampering the campaign against ISIS. For more than 18 months the Coalition has been striving to uproot ISIS from the 98- kilometer chunk of the Syrian-Turkish border that is generically referred to the “Manbij Pocket” or the Marea-Jarabulus line.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Stability in Iraq and Syria 3
    Hoover Institution Working Group on Military History A HOOVER INSTITUTION ESSAY ON THE DEFEAT OF ISIS Implementing Stability in Iraq and Syria MAX BOOT Military History The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) first captured American attention in January 2014 when its militants burst out of Syria to seize the Iraqi city of Fallujah, which US soldiers and marines had fought so hard to free in 2004. Just a few days later ISIS captured the Syrian city of Raqqa, which became its capital. At this point President Obama was still deriding it as the “JV team,” hardly comparable to the varsity squad, al-Qaeda. It became harder to dismiss ISIS when in June 2014 it conquered Mosul, Iraq’s second-largest city, and proclaimed an Islamic State under its “caliph,” Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. With ISIS executing American hostages, threatening to massacre Yazidis trapped on Mount Sinjar, and even threatening to invade the Kurdish enclave in northern Iraq, President Obama finally authorized air strikes against ISIS beginning in early August 2014. This was soon followed by the dispatch of American troops to Iraq and then to Syria to serve as advisers and support personnel to anti-ISIS forces. By the end of September 2016, there were more than five thousand US troops in Iraq and three hundred in Syria.1 At least those are the official figures; the Pentagon also sends an unknown number of personnel, numbering as many as a few thousand, to Iraq on temporary deployments that don’t count against the official troop number. The administration has also been cagey about what mission the troops are performing; although they are receiving combat pay and even firing artillery rounds at the enemy, there are said to be no “boots on the ground.” The administration is more eager to tout all of the bombs dropped on ISIS; the Defense Department informs us, with impressive exactitude, that “as of 4:59 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • UM AL-IRAQ (THE DATE PALM TREE) the Life and Work of Dr
    UM AL-IRAQ (THE DATE PALM TREE) The Life and Work of Dr. Rashad Zaydan of Iraq By Nikki Lyn Pugh, Peace Writer Edited by Kaitlin Barker Davis 2011 Women PeaceMakers Program Made possible by the Fred J. Hansen Foundation *This material is copyrighted by the Joan B. Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice. For permission to cite, contact [email protected], with “Women PeaceMakers – Narrative Permissions” in the subject line. UM AL-IRAQ (THE DATE PALM TREE) ZAYDAN – IRAQ TABLE OF CONTENTS I. A Note to the Reader …………………………………………………………. 4 II. About the Women PeaceMakers Program …………………………………… 4 III. Biography of a Woman PeaceMaker — Dr. Rashad Zaydan ….……………… 5 IV. Conflict History — Iraq………………………………………………………… 7 V. Map — Iraq ……………………………………………………………………. 14 VI. Integrated Timeline — Political Developments and Personal History ………… 15 VII. Dedication …………………………………………………………………….. 22 VIII. Narrative Stories of the Life and Work of Dr. Rashad Zaydan 23 ُ UM AL-IRAQ 24 ُّ ُّ ُّ أمُّ ُّالعُّــ راق ُُُُُّّّّّ ُُُُُُُُُّّّّّّّّّ ّأولُّث ُّمَرَةُُُُُّّّّّ FIRST FRUIT 25 ُُُُّّّّالنُّ ـــشــأْة I. GROWING UP a. The Dawn’s Prayer …………………………………………………………. 26 b. Memories of Al Mansur ……………………………………………..……… II. MEHARAB AL NOOR/TEMPLES OF LIGHT 29 م ُحــرابُّالنّـــــور c. Beauty in Diversity …………………………………………………………. 31 d. The Day of Ashura ………………………………………………………… 32 e. Summer School ……………………………………………………………. 34 f. The First Spark …………………………………………………………….. 35 g. A Place for Prayer …………………………………………………………. 37 h. Postscript: The Most Advanced Degree ……………………………………. 39 ُُُُّّّّالحـــــربُّ والعقوباتُّ)الحصار(ُُُُّّّّ III. WAR AND SANCTIONS 42 َ ُ ُ ّ i. The Meaning of Marriage ………….………………………………………. 44 j. Baiji ………….……………………………………….……………………. 45 k. Wishing for Stability …………………….…………………………………. 46 l. Kuwait………………….………………………………………………….. 49 m. The Charity Clinic ………….……………………………………………… n. Postscript: The Empty House ………….………………………………….. 51 52 ا لُّحـــــــتـــــــﻻل IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Boko Haram Insurgency in Northern
    Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences Vol.3, No.8, pp.32-45, August 2015 ___Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.eajournals.org) EXAMINING THE BOKO HARAM INSURGENCY IN NORTHERN NIGERIA AND THE QUEST FOR A PERMANENT RESOLUTION OF THE CRISIS Joseph Olukayode Akinbi (Ph.D) Department of History, Adeyemi Federal University of Education P.M.B 520, Ondo, Ondo State, Nigeria ABSTRACT: The state of insecurity engendered by Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria, especially in the North-Eastern part of the country is quiet worrisome, disheartening and alarming. Terrorist attacks of the Boko Haram sect have resulted in the killing of countless number of innocent people and wanton destruction of properties that worth billions of naira through bombings. More worrisome however, is the fact that all the efforts of the Nigerian government to curtail the activities of the sect have not yielded any meaningful positive result. Thus, the Boko Haram scourge remains intractable to the government who appears helpless in curtailing/curbing their activities. The dynamics and sophistication of the Boko Haram operations have raised fundamental questions about national security, governance issue and Nigeria’s corporate existence. The major thrust of this paper is to investigate the Boko Haram insurgency in Northern Nigeria and to underscore the urgent need for a permanent resolution of the crisis. The paper argues that most of the circumstances that led to this insurgency are not unconnected with frustration caused by high rate of poverty, unemployment, weak governance, religious fanaticism among others. It also addresses the effects of the insurgency which among others include serious threat to national interest, peace and security, internal population displacement, violation of fundamental human rights, debilitating effects on the entrenchment of democratic principles in Nigeria among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitical Overview of Conflicts 2017
    Geopolitical overview of Spanish Institute of conflicts 2017 Strategic Studies MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA Geopolitical overview Spanish Institute of of conflicts 2017 Strategic Studies MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA SPANISH OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS CATALOGUE http://publicacionesoficiales.boe.es Edita: SECRETARÍA GENERAL TÉCNICA http://publicaciones.defensa.gob.es/ © Author and Publisher, 2018 NIPO: 083-16-308-8 (print on demand) NIPO: 083-16-309-3 (e-book edition) Publication date: july 2018 The authors are solely responsible for the opinions expresed in the articles in this publication. The exploitation righits of this work are protected by the Spanish Intellectual Property Act. No parts of this publication may be produced, stored or transmitted in any way nor by any means, electronic, mechanical or print, including photo- copies or any other means without prior, express, written consent of the © copyright holders. ÍNDICE Page Chapter one Mali: Obstacles and Responses to a Complex Threat ............................................... 11 Jesús Díez Alcalde Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 13 Background ................................................................................................................................... 14 Current status of the conflict ...................................................................................................... 20 The role of external players .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Battle of Marawi': Death and Destruction in the Philippines
    ‘THE BATTLE OF MARAWI’ DEATH AND DESTRUCTION IN THE PHILIPPINES Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: Military trucks drive past destroyed buildings and a mosque in what was the main battle (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. area in Marawi, 25 October 2017, days after the government declared fighting over. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode © Ted Aljibe/AFP/Getty Images For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 35/7427/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS MAP 4 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. METHODOLOGY 10 3. BACKGROUND 11 4. UNLAWFUL KILLINGS BY MILITANTS 13 5. HOSTAGE-TAKING BY MILITANTS 16 6. ILL-TREATMENT BY GOVERNMENT FORCES 18 7. ‘TRAPPED’ CIVILIANS 21 8. LOOTING BY ALL PARTIES TO THE CONFLICT 23 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Indonesians Prone to Support the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria?
    WHY ARE INDONESIANS PRONE TO SUPPORT THE ISLAMIC STATE OF IRAQ AND SYRIA? Karen Savitri Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang [email protected] ABSTRACT Negara Islam Irak dan Syam, atau lebih dikenal sebagai ISIS, mendeklarasikan dirinya sebagai sebuah khilafah, atau negara Islam, dengan Abu Bakar Al-Baghdadi sebagai Khalifah atau pemimpin atas segala umat Muslim, pada tahun 2014. Dalam aksinya, mereka membunuh banyak orang, merugikan harta benda, serta membuat kerusakan infrastruktur dari wilayah kekuasaannya di Timur Tengah sampai dengan Asia Tenggara. Kabar kekerasan ISIS terdengar melalui media massa, dari internet, dalam artikel berita, dan didiskusikan di media sosial. Namun, dengan segala informasi mengenai kekejaman ISIS, mengapa masih ada orang Indonesia yang mendukung ISIS? Apa yang membuat mereka membenci orang-orang kafir? Apa yang memotivasi mereka untuk berjuang demi ISIS, bahkan sampai rela untuk kehilangan nyawa? Penelitian ini, dengan mengaplikasikan teori konstruktivisme, mendiskusikan kisah sejarah Indonesia dan faktor sosial yang mendasari alasan orang Indonesia mendukung ISIS. Dengan metode penelitian kualitatif, data dikumpulkan melalui interview dan studi literatur dari buku dan artikel penelitian. Peneliti mendiskusikan total 6 (enam) faktor pendorong dan penarik, mulai dari kisah sejarah, radikalisme di Tanah Air, kecendrungan orang Muslim di Indonesia, dan generasi milenial. Keywords: Radicalization, extremism, ISIS, Indonesia 1. Introduction Since the Islamic State of Iraq and Indonesians, including women
    [Show full text]
  • Why They Died Civilian Casualties in Lebanon During the 2006 War
    September 2007 Volume 19, No. 5(E) Why They Died Civilian Casualties in Lebanon during the 2006 War Map: Administrative Divisions of Lebanon .............................................................................1 Map: Southern Lebanon ....................................................................................................... 2 Map: Northern Lebanon ........................................................................................................ 3 I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 4 Israeli Policies Contributing to the Civilian Death Toll ....................................................... 6 Hezbollah Conduct During the War .................................................................................. 14 Summary of Methodology and Errors Corrected ............................................................... 17 II. Recommendations........................................................................................................ 20 III. Methodology................................................................................................................ 23 IV. Legal Standards Applicable to the Conflict......................................................................31 A. Applicable International Law ....................................................................................... 31 B. Protections for Civilians and Civilian Objects ...............................................................33
    [Show full text]