DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix International Space Station Guide Appendix Image Sources 94

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ appendix INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION GUIDE APPENDIX IMAGE SOURCES 94 NASA wishes to acknowledge the use of images provided by: Canadian Space Agency European Space Agency Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Roscosmos, the Russian Federal Space Agency INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION GUIDE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION GUIDE APPENDIX APPENDIX IMAGE SOURCES 94 95 ACRONYM LIST Acronym List 1P Progress flight DLR German Aerospace Center HTV H-II Transfer Vehicle [JAxA] 1S Soyuz flight DMS Data Management System IBMP Institute for Biomedical Problems AC Assembly Complete DOS Long-Duration Orbital Station ICC Integrated Cargo Carrier [Russian] ACU Arm Control Unit ICS Internal Communications System EADS European Aeronautic Defence ARC Ames Research Center IEA Integrated Equipment Assembly and Space Company ARIS Active Rack Isolation System IRU In-flight Refill Unit ECLSS Environmental Control and Life ATCS Active Thermal Control System Support System ISPR International Standard Payload Rack atm Atmospheres ECS Exercise Countermeasures System ISS International Space Station ATV Automated Transfer Vehicle, ECU Electronics Control Unit ITA Integrated Truss Assembly launched by Ariane [ESA] EDR European Drawer Rack ITS Integrated Truss Structure ATV-CC Automated Transfer Vehicle EDV Water Storage Container [Russian] IV-CPDS Intravehicular Charged Particle Control Centre Directional Spectrometer EF Exposed Facility BCA Battery Charging Assembly JAXA Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency EHS Environmental Health System BCDU Battery Charge Discharge Unit JEM Japanese Experiment Module ELC Express Logistics Carrier BSA Battery Stowage Assembly JEM-ELM Japanese Experiment Module- ELM Experiment Logistics Module CBM Common Berthing Mechanism Experiment Logistics Module EMU Extravehicular Mobility Unit CC Control Center JEM-ELM-EF Japanese Experiment Module- EPM European Physiology Module Experiment Logistics Module- CCAA Common Cabin Air Assembly Exposed Facility EPS Electrical Power System CCC Contaminant Control Cartridge JEM-ELM-ES ERA European Robotic Arm Japanese Experiment Module- CDRA Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly Experiment Logistics Module- ESA European Space Agency CETA Crew and Equipment Translation Exposed Section Aid/Assembly ESTEC European Space Research and JEM-ELM-PS Japanese Experiment Module- Technology Centre CEV Crew Exploration Vehicle Experiment Logistics Module- ETC European Transport Carrier Pressurized Section CEVIS Cycle Ergometer with Vibration Isolation System EVA Extravehicular Activity JEM-PM Japanese Experiment Module- Pressurized Module CHeCS Crew Health Care System ExPCA ExPRESS Carrier Avionics JEM-RMS Japanese Experiment Module- CMG Control Moment Gyroscope EXPRESS Expedite the Processing of Remote Manipulator System Experiments to the Space Station CMRS Crew Medical Restraint System JSC Johnson Space Center FGB Functional Cargo Block CMS Countermeasures System kgf Kilogram Force FRAM Flight Releasable Attachment CNES Centre National D’Études Spatiales Mechanism kN Kilonewton [French space agency] FRGF Flight Releasable Grapple Fixture KSC Kennedy Space Center COF Columbus Orbital Facility NASA wishes to acknowledge the use of FSA Roscosmos, Russian Federal lbf Pound Force COL-CC Columbus Control Centre Space Agency LF Logistics Flight images provided by: COTS Commercial Orbital FSL Fluid Science Laboratory Transportation Services LiOH Lithium Hydroxide GASMAP Gas Analyzer System for Metabolic CPDS Charged Particle Directional LSS Life Support Subsystem Canadian Space Agency Analysis Physiology Spectrometer Mb Megabit GB Gigabyte European Space Agency CRPCM Canadian Remote Power MBS Mobile Base System Controller Module GCM Gas Calibration Module MBSU Main Bus Switching Unit CSA Canadian Space Agency GCTC Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency MCC Mission Control Center CTB Cargo Transfer Bag GN&C Guidance, Navigation, and Control MDM Multiplexer-Demultiplexer Roscosmos, the Russian Federal Space Agency CWC Contingency Water Container GLONASS Global Navigation Satellite System MELFI [Russian] Minus Eighty-Degree Laboratory DC Docking Compartment; Freezer for ISS Direct Current GPS Global Positioning System MGBX Microgravity Science Glovebox DCSU Direct Current Switching Unit GRC Glenn Research Center MLE Middeck Locker Equivalent DDCU DC-to-DC Converter Unit GSC Guiana Space Center MLM Multipurpose Laboratory Module DDT&E Design, Development, Test, HMS Health Maintenance System MMOD Micrometeoroid/Orbital Debris and Evaluation HRF Human Research Facility (continued on page 96) INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION GUIDE APPENDIX ACRONYM LIST AND DEFINITIONS 96 Acronym List (continued from page 95) Definitions MMU Mass Memory Unit S0 or S Zero, Starboard trusses Assembly Complete S1, etc. Final integrated arrangement of ISS elements MOC MSS Operations Complex SARJ Assembly Stage MPLM Multi-Purpose Logistics Module Solar (Array) Alpha Rotation Joint Integrated arrangement of ISS elements SAFER Simplified Aid for EVA Rescue MSFC Marshall Space Flight Center Berthing SASA S-Band Antenna Structural Assembly MSS Mobile Servicing System Linking of two spacecraft, modules, or elements; SAW Solar Array Wing MT Mobile Transporter uses apparatus with wide internal hatch SFOG NASA National Aeronautics and Solid Fuel Oxygen Generator Docking Space Administration SFP Space Flight Participant Linking of two spacecraft; uses apparatus with narrow internal hatch NAVSTAR Navigation Signal Timing and SGANT Space-to-Ground Antenna Element Ranging [U.S. satellite] SM Service Module A structural component such as a module or NPO Production Enterprise [Russian] SPDM Special Purpose Dexterous truss segment NTO Nitrogen Tetroxide Manipulator Expedition NTSC National Television Standards SS Space Shuttle A stay on board the ISS; the long-duration crew Committee SSA Space Suit Assembly during a stay on the ISS OMS Orbital Maneuvering System SSIPC Space Station Integration and Increment OGS Oxygen Generation System Promotion Center Period of time from launch of a vehicle rotating ISS crewmembers to the undocking of the return ORU Orbital Replacement Unit SSRMS Space Station Remote vehicle for that crew OVC Oxygen Ventilation Circuit Manipulator System Mission SSU Sequential Shunt Unit P1, P6, etc. Port trusses Flight of a “visiting” Space Shuttle, Soyuz, or other STS Space Transportation System PCAS Passive Common Attach System vehicle not permanently attached to the ISS TCS PDA Payload Disconnect Assembly Thermal Control System Module TDRS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite An internally pressurized element intended PDGF Payload Data Grapple Fixture for habitation TEPC PLSS Primary Life Support System Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counter Multiplexer PM Pressurized Module A computer that interleaves multiple data TKS Orbital Transfer System PMA Pressurized Mating Adapter management functions TKSC Tsukuba Space Center POC Payload Operations Center; Nadir Primary Oxygen Circuit TMA Transportation Modified Directly below, opposite zenith Anthropometric PROX OPS Proximity Operations Port TMG Thermal Micrometeoroid Garment Left side, opposite starboard PSA Power Supply Assembly TNSC Tanegashima Space Center Rendezvous PSC Physiological Signal Conditioner TORU Progress Remote Control Unit Movement of two spacecraft toward one another PTCS Passive Thermal Control System [Russian] Space Flight Participant PVGF Power Video Grapple Fixture TSC Telescience Support Center Nonprofessional astronaut PVR Photovoltaic Radiator TSS Temporary Sleep Station Starboard Right side, opposite port RED Resistive Exercise Device TSUP Moscow Mission Control Zenith RGA Rate Gyro Assembly TVIS Treadmill Vibration Isolation System Directly above, opposite nadir RM Research Module UDMH Unsymmetrical Dimethylhydrazine RMS Remote Manipulation, UF Utilization Flight Manipulator System UHF Ultra-High Frequency RPC Remote Power Controller ULF Utilization and Logistics Flight rpm Revolutions Per Minute UMA Umbilical Mating Assembly ROEU-PDA Remotely Operated Electrical USOC Umbilical-Power Distribution User Support and Operations Centre Assembly VDC Voltage, Direct Current RPCM Remote Power Controller Module VDU Video Distribution Unit RSC Rocket and Space Corporation VOA Volatile Organic Analyzer RV Reentry Vehicle WRS Water Recovery System S&M Structures and Mechanisms Z1 Zenith 1, a truss segment.
Recommended publications
  • The BG News January 26, 1996

    The BG News January 26, 1996

    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU BG News (Student Newspaper) University Publications 1-26-1996 The BG News January 26, 1996 Bowling Green State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news Recommended Citation Bowling Green State University, "The BG News January 26, 1996" (1996). BG News (Student Newspaper). 5953. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bg-news/5953 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in BG News (Student Newspaper) by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. Inside the News This Week in Rtttitv City • Bowling Green gets crime lab Where else will you find Nation • Flat tax in hot debate in Congress The Bursar, Vinyl, Barry White and The Best Music Sports • It's gut-check time for hockey team 8 of 1995? WR Friday, January 26, 1996 Bowling Green, Ohio Volume 82, Issue 68 The News' Government is open...for now Final B p i e f s Alan Fram of federal agencies functioning Despite an apparent truce over For the next seven weeks, the The Associated Press tHrough March IS, though at extending the debt limit and stopgap spending measure would lower levels than 1995. The Sen- pressure from Wall Street to do finance many agencies whose exam NHL Scores WASHINGTON - Bruised by ate was expected to approve the so, the two sides fenced over how 1996 budgets are incomplete, in- Hartford 8 two government shutdowns.
  • I a COMPARISON STUDY on CONTROL MOMENT GYROSCOPE ARRAYS and STEERING LAWS CHITIIRAN KRISHNA MOORTHY a THESIS SUBMITTED to the F

    I a COMPARISON STUDY on CONTROL MOMENT GYROSCOPE ARRAYS and STEERING LAWS CHITIIRAN KRISHNA MOORTHY a THESIS SUBMITTED to the F

    A COMPARISON STUDY ON CONTROL MOMENT GYROSCOPE ARRAYS AND STEERING LAWS CHITIIRAN KRISHNA MOORTHY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO DECEMBER 2019 ©CHITIIRAN KRISHNA MOORTHY, 2019 i Abstract Current reaction wheels and magnetorquers for microsatellite are limited by low slew rate and heavily depends on orbital parameters for coverage area. Control moment gyroscope (CMG) clusters offer an alternative solution for high slew rates and rapid retargeting. Though CMGs are often used in large space missions, their use in microsatellites is limited due to the stringent mass budget. Most literature reports only on pyramid configuration, and there are no definite cross comparison studies between various CMG clusters and steering laws. In this research, a generic tool in Matlab and Simulink is developed to further understand CMG configurations and steering laws for a microsat mission. Various steering laws necessary for mitigating singularities in CMG clusters are compared in two distinct missions. The simulation results were evaluated based on the pointing accuracy, platform jitter, and pointing stability achieved by the spacecraft for each combination of CMG clusters, steering laws and trajectories. The simulation results demonstrate that the pyramid cluster is marginally better than the rooftop cluster in pointing accuracy. The comparison of steering laws shows that, counterintuitively, Singularity Robust steering law, which passes through singularities, outperforms both Moore-Penrose and Local Gradient methods for almost all evaluation criteria for the two missions it was tested on.
  • Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, And

    Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, And

    Part 2 Almaz/Salyut/Mir largely concerned with assembly in 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his Part 2 Earth orbit of a vehicle for circumlu- staff to develop a military station for Almaz, Salyut, nar flight, but also described a small two to three cosmonauts, with a station made up of independently design life of 1 to 2 years. They and Mir launched modules. Three cosmo- designed an integrated system: a nauts were to reach the station single-launch space station dubbed aboard a manned transport spacecraft Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport called Siber (or Sever) (“north”), Logistics Spacecraft (Russian 2.1 Overview shown in figure 2-2. They would acronym TKS) for reaching it (see live in a habitation module and section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Figure 2-1 is a space station family observe Earth from a “science- Proton booster would launch them tree depicting the evolutionary package” module. Korolev’s Vostok both. Almaz was to be equipped relationships described in this rocket (a converted ICBM) was with a crew capsule, radar remote- section. tapped to launch both Siber and the sensing apparatus for imaging the station modules. In 1965, Korolev Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry 2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, proposed a 90-ton space station to be capsules for returning data to Earth, 1962) launched by the N-1 rocket. It was and an antiaircraft cannon to defend to have had a docking module with against American attack.5 An ports for four Soyuz spacecraft.2, 3 interdepartmental commission The space station concept is very old approved the system in 1967.
  • Design Evolution and AHP-Based Historiography of Lifting Reentry Vehicle Space Programs

    Design Evolution and AHP-Based Historiography of Lifting Reentry Vehicle Space Programs

    AIAA 2016-5319 AIAA SPACE Forum 13 - 16 September 2016, Long Beach, California AIAA SPACE 2016 Design Evolution and AHP-based Historiography of Lifting Reentry Vehicle Space Programs Loveneesh Rana∗ and Bernd Chudoba y University of Texas at Arlington, TX-76019-0018 The term \Historiography" is defined as the writing of history based on the critical examination of sources. In the context of space access systems, a considerable body of lit- erature has been published addressing the history of lifting-reentry vehicle(LRV) research. Many technical papers and books have surveyed legacy research case studies, technology development projects and vehicle development programs to document the evolution of hy- personic vehicle design knowledge gained from the early 1950s onwards. However, these accounts tend to be subjective and qualitative in their discussion of the significance and level of progress made. Even though the information addressed in these surveys is consid- ered crucial, it may lack qualitative or quantitative organization for consistently measuring the contribution of an individual program. The goal of this study is to provide an anatomy aimed at addressing and quantifying the contribution of legacy programs towards the evolution of the hypersonic knowledge base. This paper applies quantified analysis to legacy lifting-reentry vehicle programs, aimed at comprehensively capturing the evolution of LRV hypersonic knowledge base. Beginning with an overview of literature surveys focusing on hypersonic research programs, a com- prehensive list of LRV programs, starting from the 1933 Silvervogel to the 2015 Dream Chaser, is assembled. These case-studies are assessed on the basis of contribution made towards major hypersonic disciplines.
  • Final 2013.Indd

    Final 2013.Indd

    SPECULATION ON ARCHITECTURE IN THE ABSENCE OF GRAVITY Speculation on Architecture in the absence of Gravity. How might architectural elements and design strategies function in outer space? Hermann Matamu 132 8392 Master Thesis explanatory document: Jeanette Budgett Abstract The evolution of architecture has been driven by a combination of elements such as style, context, materiality, aesthetic and technology. The development of materials and the technological advancements of the human race are conveyed through architecture; from the technical expertise of the ancient Egyptians in pyramid construction, to the engineering feats of the Eiffel Tower in Paris, to the physical realisation of Gehry’s Guggenheim through computer modelling. Architecture is a continuous evolution which revolves around the progression of the human race in all fields of life. Space habitation presents the next step in this architectural evolution, in which Space tourism acts as the stepping stone for the transition of architectural design beyond Earth. Space design has been produced largely without architectural input. The aim of this project is to introduce an architectural sensibility, and to investigate the impact an absence of gravitational force has on architecture. The research follows the transition of architectural design from an environment of gravity to one without, by reviewing both current literature and precedent case studies. i Acknowledgements As this chapter in my life comes to an end, I would like to thank all those who made it a memorable one. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Jeanette Budgett. Thank you for your patience, support and constant encouragement throughout my research, your knowledge and time have been instrumental in the development of this project.
  • Spaceshipone Flight 16P

    Spaceshipone Flight 16P

    SpaceShipOne Flight 16P Encyclopedia Astronautica Navigation 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Search BrowseEncyclopedia Astronautica Navigation 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Search Browse 0 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z - Search Alphabetical Encyclopedia Astronautica Index - Major Articles - People - Chronology - Countries - Spacecraft SpaceShipOne Flight 16P and Satellites - Data and Source Docs - Engines - Families - Manned Flights - Crew: Melvill. Fifth powered flight of Burt Cancelled Flights - Rockets and Missiles - Rocket Stages - Space Rutan's SpaceShipOne and first of two flights Poetry - Space Projects - Propellants - over 100 km that needed to be accomplished Launch Sites - Any Day in Space in a week to win the $10 million X-Prize. Spacecraft did a series of 60 rolls during last stage of engine burn. History USA - A Brief History of the HARP Project - Saturn V - Cape Fifth powered flight of Burt Rutan's SpaceShipOne and first of two flights over 100 km that needed to be Canaveral - Space Suits - Apollo 11 - accomplished in a week to win the $10 million X-Prize. Women of Space - Soviets Recovered an Apollo Capsule! - Apollo 13 - SpaceShipOne coasted to 103 km altitude and successfully completed the first of two X-Prize flights. The motor Apollo 18 - International Space was shut down when the pilot noted that his altitude predictor exceeded the required 100 km mark.
  • Walking the High Ground: the Manned Orbiting Laboratory And

    Walking the High Ground: the Manned Orbiting Laboratory And

    Walking the High Ground: The Manned Orbiting Laboratory and the Age of the Air Force Astronauts by Will Holsclaw Department of History Defense Date: April 9, 2018 Thesis Advisor: Andrew DeRoche, Department of History Thesis Committee: Matthew Gerber, Department of History Allison Anderson, Department of Aerospace Engineering 2 i Abstract This thesis is an examination of the U.S. Air Force’s cancelled – and heretofore substantially classified – Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL) space program of the 1960s, situating it in the broader context of military and civilian space policy from the dawn of the Space Age in the 1950s to the aftermath of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. Several hundred documents related to the MOL have recently been declassified by the National Reconnaissance Office, and these permit historians a better understanding of the origins of the program and its impact. By studying this new windfall of primary source material and linking it with more familiar and visible episodes of space history, this thesis aims to reevaluate not only the MOL program itself but the dynamic relationship between America’s purportedly bifurcated civilian and military space programs. Many actors in Cold War space policy, some well-known and some less well- known, participated in the secretive program and used it as a tool for intertwining the interests of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with the Air Force and reshaping national space policy. Their actions would lead, for a time, to an unprecedented militarization of NASA by the Department of Defense which would prove to be to the benefit of neither party.
  • Mir Hardware Heritage Index

    Mir Hardware Heritage Index

    Mir Hardware Heritage Index A attitude control systems (continued) on Kvant 2 165 Aktiv docking unit. See docking systems: Aktiv on Mir 106, 119, 123, 131, 137 Almaz (see also military space stations) on Original Soyuz 157, 168-169, 187 hardware adaptation to Salyut 69, 71 on Salyut 1 67 history 63-65 on Salyut 6 75, 79, 81, 84-85 missions 177-178 on Salyut 7 91, 100, 185 in station evolution 1, 62, 154-156 on Soyuz 1 10 system tests 70 on Soyuz Ferry 24-25 Almaz 1 64, 65, 68, 177 on Soyuz-T 47, 50 Almaz 1V satellite 65 on space station modules 155 on TKS vehicles 159 Almaz 2 64, 65, 68, 73, 177, 178 on Zond 4 14 Almaz 3 64, 73, 178 Almaz 4 64 Altair/SR satellites B description 105 berthing ports 76, 103, 105, 165 illustration 106 BTSVK computer 47 missions 108, 109, 113, 115, 118, 121, 133, 139 Buran shuttle androgynous peripheral assembly system (APAS). See crews 51, 54, 98 docking systems: APAS-75; APAS-89 flights 115, 188, 193 Antares mission 136 hardware adapted to Polyus 168 APAS. See docking systems: APAS-75; APAS-89 illustration 189 Apollo program (U.S.) (see also Apollo Soyuz Test and Mir 107, 167 Project) and Salyut 7 161 command and service module (CSM) 5, 6, 16, 172, 173, 176, 177 illustration 176 C lunar module (LM) 19, 21, 172 circumlunar flight 3, 4, 5, 12, 63, 155, 173, 175 (see illustration 175 also lunar programs) missions 172, 173, 175-178 Cosmos 133 10, 171 Apollo Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) (see also ASTP Soyuz) Cosmos 140 10, 172 background 6, 65 Cosmos 146 14, 172 mission 28, 34-35, 177-178 Cosmos 154 14, 172 and Soyuz 18 72 Cosmos 186 10-11, 172 approach systems.
  • Dynamical Study of a Control Moment Gyroscope

    Dynamical Study of a Control Moment Gyroscope

    Explicit solution of the ODEs describing the 3 DOF Control Moment Gyroscope M. van Berkel DCT 2008.104 Traineeship report Coach(es): dr. N. Sakamoto Supervisor: Prof. dr. H. Nijmeijer Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Department Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control Group Eindhoven, October, 2008 Contents Contents 3 1 Introduction 4 2 Theory of Hamiltonian and Integrable systems 5 2.1 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian .............................. 5 2.2 Liouville integrability .................................. 6 2.3 Cyclic coordinates and conserved quantities ...................... 6 2.4 Poisson bracket ...................................... 6 3 Control Moment Gyroscope 7 3.1 Description of the Control Moment Gyroscope .................... 7 3.2 Lagrangian ........................................ 8 3.3 Hamiltonian and conjugate momenta ......................... 9 3.4 CMG’s first integrals ................................... 9 3.5 Solution in Integral form ................................ 9 4 Dynamics of the CMG-system 11 4.1 Equilibrium points of the unperturbed system ..................... 11 4.2 Libration ......................................... 12 4.3 Rotation .......................................... 14 4.4 Transition from libration to rotation .......................... 14 4.5 Change of motion .................................... 15 4.6 Special case of the equilibrium point .......................... 15 4.7 Summary of the different kind of motions ....................... 16 5 Construction of the solution 17 5.1 Constant q2 .......................................
  • Spring 2021 Midterm Report

    Spring 2021 Midterm Report

    Human Spaceflight Graduate Project Midterm Report For the Crewed and Uncrewed Semi-autonomous Habitat for the Exploration of Deep Space (CU SHEDS) In Support of HOME and the NASA Exploration Program Document Number: CU BIOASTRO 2021-Spring-007 March 18, 2021 This Document is for Educational Purposes Only Prepared for: University of Colorado 3100 Marine St, 572 UCB Boulder CO 80309 Bioastronautics Group Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences College of Engineering and Applied Science University of Colorado 3775 Discovery Drive Boulder Colorado 80303 1 REVISIONS ISSUE DESCRIPTION DATE BY Notes / Major Changes 1.0 Initial Issue March 18, 2021 Rydell Stottlemyer, Colin Claytor, Kaitlyn Olson, Conner McLeod, Sam Schrup, Alex Liem, Marta Stepanyuk, Aaron Stirk, Neil Banerjee 2 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 5 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 5 2.0 SCOPE ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 INDUSTRY PARTNER INFORMATION ............................................................................... 5 3. STATEMENT OF WORK AND REQUIREMENTS INFO ....................................... 6 3.0 GROUND RULES ............................................................................................................ 6 3.1 ASSUMPTIONS ..............................................................................................................
  • 618475269-MIT.Pdf

    618475269-MIT.Pdf

    A Technoregulatory Analysis of Government Regulation and Oversight in the United States for the Protection of Passenger Safety in Commercial Human Spaceflight by Michael Elliot Leybovich B.S. Engineering Physics University of California at Berkeley, 2005 Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Engineering Systems Division in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics and Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2009 © 2009 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of author: Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Technology and Policy Program December 22, 2008 Certified by: Professor David A. Mindell Professor of Engineering Systems & Dibner Professor of the History of Engineering and Manufacturing Thesis Supervisor Certified by: Professor Dava J. Newman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics & Engineering Systems, MacVicar Faculty Fellow Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Professor Dava J. Newman Director of Technology and Policy Program Accepted by Professor David L. Darmofal Chair, Committee on Graduate Students, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2 A Technoregulatory Analysis of Government Regulation and Oversight in the United States for the Protection of Passenger Safety in Commercial Human Spaceflight by Michael Elliot Leybovich B.S. Engineering Physics University of California at Berkeley, 2005 Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Engineering Systems Division on December 22, 2008 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics and Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ABSTRACT Commercial human spaceflight looks ready to take off as an industry, with ―space tourism‖ as its first application.
  • ASCMG-JGCD-Final

    ASCMG-JGCD-Final

    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE,CONTROL, AND DYNAMICS Vol. , No. , Adaptive Singularity-Free Control Moment Gyroscopes V. Sasi Prabhakaran∗ Akrobotix LLC, Syracuse, New York 13202 and Amit Sanyal† Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244 DOI: 10.2514/1.G003545 Design considerations of agile, precise, and reliable attitude control for a class of small spacecraft and satellites using adaptive singularity-free control moment gyroscopes (ASCMG) are presented. An ASCMG differs from that of a conventional control moment gyroscopes (CMG) because it is intrinsically free from kinematic singularities and so does not require a separate singularity avoidance control scheme. Furthermore, ASCMGs are adaptive to the asymmetries in the structural members (gimbal and rotor) as well as misalignments between the center of mass of the gimbal and rotors. Moreover, ASCMG clusters are highly redundant to failure and can function as variable- and constant-speed CMGs without encountering singularities. A generalized multibody dynamics model of the spacecraft–ASCMG system is derived using the variational principles of mechanics, relaxing the standard set of simplifying assumptions made in prior literatureonCMG. The dynamics model so obtained shows the complex nonlinearcoupling between the internal degrees of freedom associated with an ASCMGand the spacecraft attitude motion.The general dynamics model is then extended to include the effects of multiple ASCMG, called the ASCMG cluster, and the sufficient conditions for nonsingular cluster configurations are obtained. The adverse effects of the simplifying assumptions that lead to the intricate design of the conventional CMG, and how they lead to singularities, become apparent in this development. A bare-minimum hardware prototype of an ASCMG using low-cost commercial off-the-shelf components is developed to show the design simplicity and scalability.