The Memorials of the Family of Sankey 1207-1880"

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Memorials of the Family of Sankey 1207-1880 A STUDY OF "THE MEMORIALS OF THE FAMILY OF SANKEY 1207-1880" PRINTED FROM THE GENEALOGICAL COLLECTIONS OF CLEMENT SANKEY BEST-GARDNER. PUBLISHED PRIVATELY IN 1880 AT SWANSEA. VERSION 1.12 Saturday, August 03, 2013 TIM SANKEY APPLEBOUGH FRITH END BORDON HAMPSHIRE GU35 0RA MEMORIALS OF THE FAMILY OF SANKEY 1207-1880 1 DOCUMENT HISTORY ............................................................................................................... 5 1.1 ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTORS .......................................................................................... 5 1.1.1 NEIL BARNES .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1.2 JUDITH BOWMAN OF AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND .................................................. 6 1.1.3 PAULINE GRIMLEY OF BEDFORD .............................................................................. 6 1.1.4 JAMES HORSLEY OF COUNTY KERRY, IRELAND ...................................................... 7 1.1.5 PRUE JAMES OF CHELMSFORD, ESSEX .................................................................... 7 1.1.6 SHELAGH LEA OF RAMSGATE, KENT ......................................................................... 9 1.1.7 MALCOLM SAINTY OF AUSTRALIA .............................................................................. 9 1.1.8 JOAN McALLISTER ......................................................................................................... 9 1.1.9 ANNE & PHILIP SANKEY ............................................................................................. 10 1.1.10 CHARLES SANKEY OF SOUTH AFRICA ..................................................................... 10 1.1.11 GEOFF SANKEY OF NORWICH .................................................................................. 10 1.1.12 GRAHAM RICHARD SANKEY OF OXTED, SURREY .................................................. 10 1.1.13 JOHN DOUGLAS SANKEY OF ONTARIO, CANADA .................................................. 10 1.1.14 PAUL STICKELLS OF DOVER, KENT ......................................................................... 10 1.1.15 JANETTE TYREMAN (nee SANKEY) OF ONTARIO, CANADA ................................... 11 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 OUTLINE STRUCTURE SHOWING MAIN LINKS ........................................................... 13 2.2 LOCATION OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT .................................................................. 14 2.3 NOTES ON THE BODLEIAN LIBRARY COPY ................................................................. 14 2.4 PREFACE TO THE PRINTED EDITION ............................................................................. 14 2.5 ADDENDA TO THE PRINTED EDITION ........................................................................... 15 2.6 NOTE TO THE HANDWRITTEN COPY ............................................................................. 16 2.7 BURKE’S LANDED GENTRY ............................................................................................. 16 2.8 CAVEAT EMPTOR ............................................................................................................... 16 3 THE MEMORIALS ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 A1 GEOFFREY DE SANKEY OF SANKEY MAGNA......................................................... 17 3.1.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 17 3.1.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 17 3.1.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 17 3.2 A2 LAWRENCE SANKEY OF SANKEY ............................................................................. 18 3.2.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 18 3.2.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 18 3.2.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 18 3.3 A3 JOHN SANKEY OF SANKEY, SOUTHALL & STRETTON ......................................... 19 3.3.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 19 3.3.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 19 3.3.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 19 3.4 A4: JOHN SANKEY OF SANKEYTOWN, IRELAND ........................................................ 20 3.4.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 20 3.4.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 20 3.4.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 21 3.5 A5: HENRY GORE SANKEY OF CO. CAVAN ................................................................... 22 3.5.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 22 3.5.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 22 3.5.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 22 3.6 B: JOHN OR PETER SANKEY OF CARTWAIR, SHROPSHIRE ....................................... 23 3.6.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 23 3.6.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 23 3.6.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 23 3.7 B1: RICHARD SANKEY ....................................................................................................... 24 3.7.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 24 3.7.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 24 3.7.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 24 3.8 C: WILLIAM SANKEY ......................................................................................................... 25 3.8.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 25 3.8.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 25 Version 1.12 Page 2 of 88 MEMORIALS OF THE FAMILY OF SANKEY 1207-1880 3.8.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 26 3.9 D: OF KENT, LONDON, OXFORDSHIRE, GLOUCESTERSHIRE ETC. .......................... 28 3.9.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 28 3.9.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 28 3.9.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 28 3.10 E: EDWARD SANKEY OF MILTON CHAPEL ................................................................... 29 3.10.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 29 3.10.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 29 3.10.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 29 3.11 E1: EDWARD SANKEY ....................................................................................................... 30 3.11.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 30 3.11.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 30 3.11.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 30 3.12 E2: JOHN SANKEYOF BARHAM, KENT ........................................................................... 31 3.12.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 31 3.12.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ....................................................................................... 32 3.12.3 REVISED DESCENDANCY ........................................................................................... 33 3.13 E3: ELIZABETH SANKEY ................................................................................................... 34 3.13.1 AS PUBLISHED ............................................................................................................. 34 3.13.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Cat No Ref Title Author 3170 H3 an Airman's
    Cat Ref Title Author OS Sqdn and other info No 3170 H3 An Airman's Outing "Contact" 1842 B2 History of 607 Sqn R Aux AF, County of 607 Sqn Association 607 RAAF 2898 B4 AAF (Army Air Forces) The Official Guide AAF 1465 G2 British Airship at War 1914-1918 (The) Abbott, P 2504 G2 British Airship at War 1914-1918 (The) Abbott, P 790 B3 Post War Yorkshire Airfields Abraham, Barry 2654 C3 On the Edge of Flight - Development and Absolon, E W Engineering of Aircraft 3307 H1 Looking Up At The Sky. 50 years flying with Adcock, Sid the RAF 1592 F1 Burning Blue: A New History of the Battle of Addison, P/Craig JA Britain (The) 942 F5 History of the German Night Fighter Force Aders, Gerbhard 1917-1945 2392 B1 From the Ground Up Adkin, F 462 A3 Republic P-47 Thunderbolt Aero Publishers' Staff 961 A1 Pictorial Review Aeroplane 1190 J5 Aeroplane 1993 Aeroplane 1191 J5 Aeroplane 1998 Aeroplane 1192 J5 Aeroplane 1992 Aeroplane 1193 J5 Aeroplane 1997 Aeroplane 1194 J5 Aeroplane 1994 Aeroplane 1195 J5 Aeroplane 1990 Aeroplane Cat Ref Title Author OS Sqdn and other info No 1196 J5 Aeroplane 1994 Aeroplane 1197 J5 Aeroplane 1989 Aeroplane 1198 J5 Aeroplane 1991 Aeroplane 1200 J5 Aeroplane 1995 Aeroplane 1201 J5 Aeroplane 1996 Aeroplane 1525 J5 Aeroplane 1974 Aeroplane (Pub.) 1526 J5 Aeroplane 1975 Aeroplane (Pub.) 1527 J5 Aeroplane 1976 Aeroplane (Pub.) 1528 J5 Aeroplane 1977 Aeroplane (Pub.) 1529 J5 Aeroplane 1978 Aeroplane (Pub.) 1530 J5 Aeroplane 1979 Aeroplane (Pub.) 1531 J5 Aeroplane 1980 Aeroplane (Pub.) 1532 J5 Aeroplane 1981 Aeroplane (Pub.) 1533 J5
    [Show full text]
  • Cle Course Materials
    Transaction Advisors conferences provide corporate executives, board members, and private equity investors with practical information and perspective on the latest strategies and considerations in the structuring and execution of complex corporate transactions. We enlist the foremost experts to share their experience, insights and perspective on innovative transaction structures, processes and strategy. M&A CONFERENCE SERIES CLE COURSE MATERIALS TransactionAdvisors.com/Conferences Table of Contents Fund Ltd v. Aruba Networks, Inc.– Calculating Fair Value in Statutory Appraisal Cases. (View in document) 1. Speaker Biographies (view in document) Panel 5: Frameworks for managing and integrating 2. CLE Materials acquired brands Day 1 Cleary Gottlieb. Risks to the Buyer of Fiduciary Duty Breaches by the Target in the M&A Sale Process. Panel 2: Improving board engagement in each phase of (View in document) the M&A process Albert, Gregg. Duarte, Gerald. Ziemann, Tim. Sweetening the Deal: Digitizing M&A for Market Advantage. (View in document) Horsley, Peter. Snider, Allison. McRoskey, Brian. New Rules for M&A in Consumer Products. (View in document) Panel 3: Digital acquisition challenges and deal structures 2018 Intralinks. Annual M&A Leaks Report. (View in document) Panel 4: Dealing with leaks and M&A security Understanding how to match contractual language to deal intentions. (View in document) Day 2 Panel 1: Navigating global merger control and regulatory challenges Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. Antitrust remedies and reverse break fees. (View in document) Panel 3: Improving deal term negotiations and protections Apfelroth, Joshua. Mills, William. Halper, Jason. Strict Interpretation of Merger Agreements: Vintage Rodeo Parent, LLC v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epidemiology and Prevention of Paraquat Poisoning Lesley J
    Human Toxicol. (1987), 6, 19-29 The Epidemiology and Prevention of Paraquat Poisoning Lesley J. Onyon and Glyn N. Volans National Poisons Information Service, The Poisons Unit, Guy's Hospira!, London SEl 9RT 1 Jn the UK there was an increase in the annual number of deaths associated with paraquat poisoning between 1966 and 1975. Since that time there has been little change in numbers. 2 High mortality is associated commonly with suicidal intent. Serious accidental poisoning from paraquat has never been frequent in the UK and there have been no deaths reported in children since 1977. 3 The National Poisons Information Service has monitored in detail all reports of paraquat poisoning since 1980. Of the 1074 cases recorded there were 209 deaths. In recent years serious poisoning has been more commonly associated with ingestion of concentrated products by males. Local exposure to paraquat has not resulted in systemic poisoning. 4 International data for paraquat poisoning is incomplete and difficult to compare. There is a scarcity of morbidity data at both international and national levels. Information obtained from Poison Control Centres indicates that paraquat poisoning occurs in many countries but detailed comparisons are hindered by lack of standardised methods of recording. 5 Various measures to prevent paraquat poisoning have been introduced. Their effectiveness has not been studied in detail. Some support is provided by the low incidence of serious accidental paraquat poisoning in the UK, but because of the suicidal nature of paraquat poisoning it is unlikely that current preventative measures will influence the number of deaths occurring each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeptics Ufonewsletter
    KEPTICS UFONEWSLETTER SUN #48 S' By Philip J. Klass 404 'N .. St SW Wash;ilglon DC 20024 Nov. 1997 Copyright (1997) UFOiogist Robert Dean Claims .. It's Quite Easy To Lie To The American Public." And Demonstrates This Claim To Be True Robert 0. Dean, a rising star in the UFO lecture circuit, initially attracted attention by claiming to reveal the "Cosmic Top Secret" results of an alleged three-year UFO investigation by NATO in the early 1960s. But in his lecture on July 5 at the Roswell 50th anniversary celebration, Dean claims he has found extensive evidence that ETs have been visiting Earth for thousands of years. The evidence: paintings found on the walls of prehistoric caves in northern Spain and in ancient Egyptian tombs. Seemingly, Dean has become • A~~ri~~·s t>wn Erich von llanik.en; who achieved fame wit~ similar claims in his 1968 book., "Chariots of the Gods. • Examination of Dean's service record confirms that he did serve four years at NATO headquarters from mid ·1963 to mid-1967 with the rank of Master Sergeant, as be claims. (Dean entered the Army on April 5, 1950, and retired on Oct. 31, 1976- -with many decorations for combat service in Korea and later in Vietnam.) But while Dean claims he worked as an "Intelli­ gence Analyst" at NATO headquarters, his military records show his duty assignment there was "Ch. Clk. Lang. Svc. Br." [Chief Clerk Language Service Branch]. During Dean's Roswell talk, be claimed be "was trained as an intelligence analyst. • However, Dean's service record does not show he ever received such training.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Stop and Search Powers Genevieve Lennon*
    Searching for change: Scottish stop and search powers Genevieve Lennon* A. INTRODUCTION B. SCOTTISH STOP AND SEARCH POWERS (1) Suspicion-based statutory powers (2) Suspicionless statutory powers (3) Non-statutory powers C. COMPATIBILITY WITH THE ECHR (1) Suspicionless statutory powers (2) Suspicion-based statutory powers (3) Non-statutory powers D. CONCLUSION A. INTRODUCTION In numerous countries, stop and search powers are an open sore upon police-community relations, one which is increasingly being challenged through the courts. In the USA, the discriminatory practices associated with stop and search powers led to the coining of terms such as “driving while black” (more recently joined by “flying while brown”). In 2013, the District Court for the Southern District of New York held, inter alia, that the City of New York was liable for their indifference towards the New York City Police Department’s widespread practice of stop and frisk which violated the fourth and fourteenth amendments of the Constitution.1 In England stop and search practices were a commonly cited factor in the * Chancellor’s Fellow, University of Strathclyde. I am grateful to Dr Claire McDiarmid and Prof Kenneth Norrie for their insights regarding children’s capacity to consent and to the anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments. The usual caveats apply. 1 Floyd et al v the City of New York et al 959 F Supp 5d 540 (2013). 1 Tottenham riots, and a stop, search, and arrest power was the catalyst for the Brixton riots.2 Since 2010, stop and search has come before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in two cases, one from the Netherlands, the other from the UK.3 Other examples can be found across the globe.4 By contrast, until very recently stop and search was a non-issue in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • THE USE of DAIRY MANURE COMPOST for SUSTAINABLE MAIZE (Zea Mays L.) PRODUCTION
    THE USE OF DAIRY MANURE COMPOST FOR SUSTAINABLE MAIZE (Zea mays L.) PRODUCTION Vânia Cabüs de Toledo Thesis submitted to the University of London in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Wye College University of London September 1996 7 BIBL\ t Lc4oI() Abstract Intensive production systems for maize (Zea mays L.) based on the use of inorganic fertilisers are expensive and unsustainable, as their production is dependent on fossil fuels. Additionally, inorganic fertilisers are unable to maintain soil fertility over the long-term, and are related to environmental problems such as soil erosion and nitrate pollution of the ground water table. Moreover, high cost agrochemicals are either unavailable or too costly for small farmers in tropical countries, where maize is usually grown as a subsistence crop. This research project examined the use of compost derived from dairy manure and cereal straw, renewable resources available on the farm, as an organic fertiliser for a sustainable maize production system. The effects of this compost on soil and plant nutrient content, and on maize and weed growth were studied, examining the various soil-plant interactions. The relevant literature was reviewed, comparing different production systems, and examining aspects of maize production, nutrient recycling and the effects and interactions of compost in the soil-plant system. Field and glasshouse experiments were carried out from 1993 to 1995 on Wye College Estate, UK, comparing the use of dairy manure compost and inorganic fertiliser in forage maize production. Soil chemical (nutrient content) and biological (microbial biomass and activity) aspects were analysed at several stages of maize development.
    [Show full text]
  • R&D Project 291 Riparian and Instream Species-Habitat
    Draft Project Report R&D Project 291 Riparian and Instream Species-Habitat Relationships University of Leicester September 1992 R&D 291/3/W ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Authors L.E. Parkyn D.M. Harper C.D. Smith Publisher National Rivers Authority Rivers House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS12 4UD Tel : 0454 624400 Fax : 0454 624409 © National Rivers Authority 1992 Project details NRA R&D Project 291 Project Leader: R. Howell, Welsh Region Contractor : University of Leicester CONTENTS ~ Page FOREWORD . ^ . - - ix SUMMARY xi RECOMMENDATIONS xiii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Statutory background 1 1.2 Scientific background 2 1.3 Outputs 4 2. RIPARIAN AND FLOODPLAIN HABITATS 5 2.1 Plant communities 5 2.1.1 Introduction 5 2.1.2 Riparian 5 2.1.3 Lotic 8 2.1.4 Lentic 8 2.2 Animal communities 9 2.2.1 Woody vegetation 9 2.2.2 Herbaceous vegetation 10 2.2.3 Litter and woody debris 11 2~2.5' Bare substrata 12 2.2.6 Lentic 13 3. INSTREAM HABITATS 15 3.1 Fish 15 3.1.1 Instream Flow Incremental Methodology 15 3.1.2 Habitat assessment and scoring systems 18 3.2 Aquatic invertebrates 19 3.2.1 Context 19 3.2.2 Background 21 3.2.3 Particulate substrata 25 3.2.4 Aquatic macrophytes 27 3.2.6 Woody debris 34 3.2.7 Tree roots / undercut hanks 35 3.2.8 Exposed rock 35 3.2.9 Unclassified habitat features 36 3.2.10 Habitat list 36 Page 4. FISH 37 4.1 Background 37 4.2 Trout CSalmo trutta and Oncorhynchus mykiss) 37 4.2.1 Habitat summary 37 4.2.2 Introduction 39 4.2.3 General character of trout streams 39 4.2.4 Life history 39 4.2.5 Spawning 39 4.2.6 Diet 40
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 530 30 June 2011 No. 180 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 30 June 2011 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 1083 30 JUNE 2011 1084 Mrs Spelman: My hon. Friend is right, and I remember House of Commons that extremely good initiative. We want to encourage not only parliamentarians but all individuals, and schools Thursday 30 June 2011 and places of work, to plant more trees. We aim to plant 1 million new trees within this parliamentary Session. I will certainly look at the parliamentary scheme as an The House met at half-past Ten o’clock opportunity to remind colleagues how important it is that we do our bit. PRAYERS Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op): I supported John Major’s initiative, which was very good, [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] and sponsored two trees in memory of my parents. If we care about our forests and woods, we must ensure that the next generation visits, enjoys and learns about them. The number of out-of-school visits is collapsing Oral Answers to Questions and we must do something about it. Will the Secretary of State join the initiative of the John Clare Trust, which I chair, in launching the “Every child’s right to ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS the countryside” campaign, and give it a bit of support? Mrs Spelman: The hon.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glider Pilot Bold... Wally Kahn a Glider Pilot Bold
    A Glider Pilot Bold.. f ttom % fRfltng liBttattg of A Glider Pilot Bold... Wally Kahn A Glider Pilot Bold... Wally Kahn First edition published by Jardine Publishers 1998 Second edition published by Airplan Flight Equipment Ltd Copyright ©2008 Third edition published by Walter Kahn 2011 Copyright ©WALTER KAHN (1998 & 2008) and Airplan Flight Equipment (2008) WALTER KAHN 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a newspaper, magazine, or radio or television broadcast. Every effort has been made by the author and the publishers to trace owners of copyright material. The events described have been cross-checked wherever possible and the author apologises for any errors or omissions which may have arisen. Cover photograph courtesy Neil Lawson. White Planes Co A Glider Pilot Bold... 1st Edition original cover Contents Another bite of the cherry .................................................................................9 Chapter 1 The early days and Oerlinghausen ..........................................15 Chapter 2 More Oerlinghausen.................................................................19 Chapter 3 Mindeheide and Scharfholdendorf ...........................................29 Chapter 4 Dunstable and Redhill
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerability of Organic Soils in England and Wales
    VULNERABILITY OF ORGANIC SOILS IN ENGLAND AND WALES Final technical report to DEFRA and Countryside Council for Wales DEFRA Project SP0532 CCW contract FC 73-03-275 Joseph Holden1, Pippa Chapman1, Martin Evans2, Klaus Hubacek3, Paul Kay1, Jeff Warburton4 1School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT. 2Upland Environments Research Unit, The School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester, Mansfield Cooper Building, Manchester, M13 9PL. 3Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT. 4Department of Geography, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE. February 2007 1 Contents 1. OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................................................... 8 2. ORGANIC SOILS: CLASSIFICATION AND BASIC CHARACTERISTICS ................................................... 10 2.1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 METHODS USED ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 2.3. CLASSIFICATION, DEFINITIONS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION........................................................................................ 10 2.4. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF ORGANIC SOILS........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fences in the Countryside
    L Photograph by courtesy Dunedin City Council. Aerial photogrammetric mapping • Large scale photo enlargements • Mosaics • Ground control surveys AERO SURVEYS New Zealand)LTD. P.O. Box 444 Tauranga Telephone 88-166 Number 46 Jvin Jig 7 March 1977 Editorial 4 A sense of direction Robert Riddell 5 Letter from Britain: The Community Land Act G.W.A. Bush 6 Local government & urban development Richard Thompson 15 The second transport study: A review reviewed John Chivers 18 Fences in the countryside Rosemary Barrington 24 Multi unit housing in Calgary R.V. Welch 30 Planning conflicts within tourist centres: A comment Robert Riddell 33 Letter from Britain; Development Control Morris Taylor 35 Book Review Peter Horsley 36 Casebook Town Planning Quarterly is the official journal of the New Address all correspondence to the Editor: Town Zealand Planning Institute Incorporated, P.O. Box 6388 Planning Quarterly, P.O.Box 8789, Symonds Street, Auckland Auckland 1. Telephone/Telegrams: 74-740 Editor: J.R. Dart Technical Editor: M.H.Pritchard Department of Town Planning, University of Auckland Annual Subscription: $5.00 (New Zealand and Australia) Design: David Reynolds post free, elsewhere $NZ6.00 Cover Photograph : Jim Dart The Institute does not accept responsibility for statements Printed by made or opinions expressed in this Journal unless this Acme Printing Works Ltd, responsibility is expressly acknowledged. 137 Great North Road, Published March, June, September, December. Auckland. Town Planning Quarterly 46 —3 But exporting industry means cities and we fret at the way in which people move from small towns to big towns and the way in which the most industry and the most peo- ple seem to congregate together.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing Archaeology; Exploring the Reality of the Heritage Management of England’S Wetlands
    Valuing archaeology; exploring the reality of the heritage management of England’s wetlands Submitted by William Fletcher, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology on 31st March 2011 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. (Signature) ………………………… 1 For Kate and Amy 2 Abstract This work primarily examines the management of wet-preserved archaeological sites in England, through an exploration of value and analysis of current management approaches. The aim is to explore whether the current policy frameworks, in particular the role of preservation in situ, can provide a sustainable future for wet-preserved archaeological sites. This work further seeks to conceptualise the modelling of sustainability, preservation and management decision making in wetland archaeological sites. Looking at the last 40 year of wetland research through the work of the large-scale wetland survey projects, this work initially considers the current understanding of wet archaeological sites in England. It also examines aspects of heritage management through the legislative and policy frameworks and their legacy. This work considers the implications that legislative and policy positions have for the management of wetland archaeological sites and examines the theoretical concepts that underpin them. This includes exploring reflective management, the development of research frameworks, and scoring mechanisms for the designation of sites.
    [Show full text]