October 2011 Bulletin.Pub
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stamford Individual Station Report
STAMFORD TRANSPORTATION CENTER VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT January 2007 Prepared by the Bureau of Public Transportation Connecticut Department of Transportation Stamford Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Overview: The Stamford Transportation Center is located by Exit 8 of I-95. The station and parking garage were constructed in 1985. Center island platforms and the new pedestrian bridge were added in 2002 and the garage was expanded to over 2000 spaces in 2004. The center includes a bus terminal, a small commercial mall and taxi stand. The Stamford train station is the second busiest station on the New Haven Line (Grand Central Terminal is the busiest). Thousands of patrons pass through its doors everyday. Its center island platforms can board four trains at a time. Maintenance Responsibilities: Owner: CDOT Operator: CDOT Platform Lights: Metro-North Trash: Metro-North Snow Removal: Metro-North Shelter Glazing: Metro-North Platform Canopy: Metro-North Platform Structure: Metro-North Parking: CDOT Page 2 Stamford Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Station Layout: Station Building State-Owned Parking Area Municipality-Owned Parking Area Privately-Owned Parking Area Page 3 Stamford Train Station Visual Inspection Report January 2007 Train Station Visual Inspection Parameters: The Connecticut Department of Transportation (Department) recently inspected all 36 New Haven Line train stations to assess their appearance, safety, means of access and overall condition. Observations have been noted in an inspection report prepared for each station. The findings of these individual reports will be used to develop a Station Improvement Program. Initially, maintenance issues will be passed along to responsible parties for resolution. -
Meeting of the Metro-North Railroad Committee March 2018
Meeting of the Metro-North Railroad Committee March 2018 Members S. Metzger N. Brown R. Glucksman C. Moerdler J. Molloy M. Pally A. Saul V. Vanterpool J. Vitiello C. Wortendyke N. Zuckerman Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 3/19/2018 8:30 - 9:30 AM ET 1. Public Comments 2. Approval of Minutes Minutes - Page 4 3. 2018 Work Plan 2018 MNR Work Plan - Page 12 4. President's Reports Safety MNR Safety Report - Page 20 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 22 5. Action Item MNR Action Item - Page 28 Extension of Refund Period for Railroad Tickets Extension of Refund Period of Railroad Tickets - Page 29 6. Information Items MNR Information Items - Page 31 Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies - Page 32 Annual Elevator & Escalator Report Annual Escalator & Elevator Report - Page 62 2017 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results 2017 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results - Page 73 PTC Status Report PTC Status Report - Page 118 7. Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 132 Non-Competitive MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 136 Competitive MNR Competitive Procurements - Page 142 8. Operations Report MNR Operations Report - Page 146 9. Financial Report MNR Finance Report - Page 155 10. Ridership Report MNR Ridership Report - Page 175 11. Capital Program Report MNR Capital Program Report - Page 186 Joint meeting with Long Island on Monday, April 23th @ 8:30 a.m. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Metro-North Committee Monday, February 20, 2018 Meeting held at 2 Broadway – 20th Floor New York, New York 10004 8:30 a.m. -
WCDOT Sysmapbrch
C C ro to n F a lls R d R D L O C V R E - L 2 L 2 S T y e To Poughkeepsie d d To Carmel Bowl l al R 77 R V Park-and-Ride L e TLC e n PART2 o k c o i 6N PART2 v a a n l e W L U l P d l a o S R n n o i t r a d w Mahopac e w S d h l 6 a c Village t a d c r s B R A Center d k O Har o R dsc bbl e ra T S o L L r E V O L r E e B l l t t PART2 i u S o M r c LEGEND p a S p PUTNAM o h d a Baldwin HOW TO RIDE M R Regular Service w 0 llo Somers COUNTY o Jefferson 77 Place FOR YOUR SAFETY & COMFORT H Commons Lincolndale ill 16 Express/Limited-Stop ks k Valley 0 1. Arrive at the bus stop at least 5 minutes Pee 6 Service 202 PART2 Bee-Line buses belong to everyone, so please help us to take good care of them! Shrub Oak 16 Memorial Park St early to avoid missing your bus. E Main Rd 118 L Part-time Service us d 12 0 c N o iti 9 t T v R C D S e To ensure the safety and comfort of all Please be courteous to those riding with you: R l N O G l E R 77 O D i Thomas Je#erson Elementary School L l O 16 u 77 k l Shrub Oak r 2. -
You've Got Connections! (2002)
You’ve Got Connections ! Increasing Shuttle Bus Services To The MTA RailRoads DECEMBER 2002 Ellyn Shannon TRANSPORTATION PLANNER Katherine Brower ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10017 Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the information and insights provided by a wide variety of people. Evelyn Lane provided valuable core research material for the development of this report. At Metro-North Railroad, thanks are due to Charles Zabielski, Director; Daniel O’Connell, Assistant Director-Marketing Strategy; David Wong, Manager-Service Development and Kent Patterson, Project Manager- Service Development in the Department of Marketing; and Randall Fleischer- Director; Deborah Buckley, Assistant Director-Parking and Facility Planning; Janet Jenkins, Senior Parking Program Administrator; and Elizabeth Rivera, Project Coordinator in the Department of Facilities and Parking Planning. At Long Island Rail Road, thanks go to Brian Dolan, Vice President- Market Development and Public Affairs; Elisa Picca, Director-Strategic Investments; Kevin Rush, Director Parking Program-Strategic Investments; Joyce Shuman, Manager Station Access-Strategic Investments; Janet Lewis, Director- Government and Community Affairs; Teresa Conetta, General Manager Market Development- Public Affairs; Carl Jackson, Market Director-Public Affairs; and Susan McGowan, Director-Corporate Communication-Public Affairs. At Long Island Bus, thanks go to Neil Yellin, President; and Bob Campbell, Manager-Scheduling. Thanks also go to Diane Flanagan of Long Beach Bus, Naomi Klein of Westchester County Department of Transportation, Mary Anne Gallagher of Leprechaun Lines, Mark Lowen of Huntington Area Rapid Transit, Garrett Hewlett of Suffolk County Transit, Viviana Espinosa of Housatonic Area Rapid Transit, Sally Stocker of New Jersey Transit, and Andrew Ziegler of Bee Line Bus. -
Appendix a Parking Demand Analysis Appendix A: Parking Demand Analysis
Appendix A Parking Demand Analysis Appendix A: Parking Demand Analysis A. INTRODUCTION This appendix provides an overview of parking at the Metro-North Railroad North White Plains station. Based mostly on analysis reported on in 2005, this appendix presents the following: Existing parking demand and capacity at North White Plains station; Future parking demand at North White Plains; and The ability of alternative parking demand management strategies to reduce the need to provide additional parking at North White Plains. B. EXISTING PARKING DEMAND AND CAPACITY Existing parking capacity at the station is 1,355 spaces (Figure A-1); the majority of these parking spaces are owned by Metro-North and Westchester County and do not have residency restrictions. However, several spaces operated by others are restricted based on residency. Based on 2005 data, Westchester County, White Plains, and North Castle had waiting lists for permits at three of the station’s four lots. Parking utilization surveys were conducted on November 18 and 19, 2003; September 27, 2006; and October 29, 2008. The results of these studies are summarized in Table A-1. The results of the September 2006 study indicate higher utilization in Lot 1 than was observed in 2003. However, utilization of residency restricted lots (e.g., White Plains resident permit spaces and Lot 3) was lower in 2006 compared to overall non-residency restricted utilization. Low percent utilization in Lot 3 may represent: a) permit holders who do not park on a regular basis but wish to retain the privilege of using the North Castle lot due to permit fee differential; and/or b) limited permit oversell based on Town policy. -
MTA Metro-North Railroad
MTA Metro-North Railroad Capital Programs Contracting Opportunities NYBC Conference November 2014 Metro-North Railroad 1 • 86 stations in NY State • 387 route miles and 795 track miles • 11 shops and /or yard facilities system-wide MTA Metro-North Railroad 2 2010- 2014 Capital Program = $1.5B Miscellaneous, 4.9% Rolling Stock, 15.9% Shops and Yards, 19.6% Grand Central Terminal, 6.0% Outlying Stations/Parking, 9.5% Power, 6.8% Track, 11.5% Communication and Signals, 17.7% Structures, 5.0% West of Hudson Infrastructure, 3.1% MTA Metro-North Railroad 3 Grand Central Terminal Forecast Duration Budget DESCRIPTION Award (Months) Range Construction Services: GCT Utilities – Fire Suppression Services 2nd Qtr 2015 24 10M – 50M 4 Outlying Stations Forecast Duration Budget DESCRIPTION Award (Months) Range Construction Services: Station Building Rehabilitation / Net Lease - Hartsdale Station Exterior 1st Qtr 2015 10 < 1M Building Restoration (SBMP* Tier 1) Station Building Rehabilitation - Tarrytown Station Depot Plaza (portion 3rd Qtr 2015 12 1M – 5M SBMP*) *SBMP – Small Business Mentoring Program 5 Tarrytown Station Metro-North Railroad 6 Fordham Station Metro-North Railroad 7 Track & Structures 6th Ave 10th Ave 14th Ave Forecast Duration Budget DESCRIPTION Award (Months) Range Construction Services: Overhead Bridge Program –East of Hudson: Rehabilitation / 1st Qtr 2017 24 5M – 10M Replacement of 6th Ave, 10th Ave, 14th Ave Bridges 8 Power Forecast Duration Budget DESCRIPTION Award (Months) Range Construction Services: Replace Motors Alternators -
February 2012 ERA Bulletin.Pub
The ERA BULLETIN - FEBRUARY, 2012 Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 55, No. 2 February, 2012 The Bulletin THIRD AVENUE’S POOR FINANCIAL CONDITION LED Published by the Electric TO ITS CAR REBUILDING PROGRAM 75 YEARS AGO Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box (Continued from January, 2012 issue) 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. In the early 1930s, the company was oper- scrapped: truck frames; trolley poles and ating approximately 800 cars on 250 miles of bases; seat frames, cushions, and backs; air For general inquiries, track. Most of the fleet was composed of ob- compressors; line switches; journal boxes; contact us at bulletin@ solete slow wooden two-motor double-truck door engines; and brake cylinders. erausa.org or by phone cars built in 1908, 1909, and 1911. The 100 All rebuilt and new cars had Brill 77E at (212) 986-4482 (voice single-truck convertibles built in 1914 and trucks, which were purchased second-hand mail available). ERA’s 1924 were uncomfortable; their front and rear or rebuilt from older trucks in the 65th Street website is www.erausa.org. platforms bounced when the car was run- Shop. Brill 39E single-motor trucks removed ning. from scrapped cars were salvaged to con- Editorial Staff: But the company could not afford new struct the equivalent of a 77E truck. Motor Editor-in-Chief: equipment because the city insisted on main- axle ends of the 39E side frames were joined Bernard Linder News Editor: taining a five-cent fare. Therefore, the com- by welding and mechanical reinforcement to Randy Glucksman pany found an alternate method of moderniz- fabricate a new truck designated as 77T. -
WCDOT Sysmapbrch
C C r ot on F a lls R d R D L O C V R E - L 2 L 2 S T d To Poughkeepsie To Carmel Bowl R 77 ey d d l Park-and-Ride al R R TLC V PART2 L e e n o c PART2 o k 6N v i a a l e n L W l P U l d S a o n i R n o t r w a d e d Mahopac w l S h a a c 6 c t Village r s B d O A Center R d k Hards d o R crabble R T S L L o r E V O L r E e l B l t PART2 i u t M ro p S LEGEND c S a p PUTNAM o h a Baldwin HOW TO RIDE M Rd Regular Service w 0 lo Jefferson 77 Somers COUNTY ol Place FOR YOUR SAFETY & COMFORT H Commons Lincolndale ll ki 16 Express/Limited-Stop ek s Valley 0 1. Arrive at the bus stop at least 5 minutes Pe 6 Service 202 PART2 Bee-Line buses belong to everyone, so please help us take good care of them! Shrub Oak 16 Memorial Park early to avoid missing your bus. Main St d E 12 118 Part-time Service us R 0 L itic o T 9 d v t R D To ensure the safety and comfort of all Please be courteous to those riding with you: R e N O 77 G E C l R O S D 16 Thomas Je#erson Elementary School l L l O 77 i l u b Oak k Shru S Connecting Route 2. -
November 2011 Bulletin.Pub
TheNEW YORK DIVISION BULLETIN - NOVEMBER, 2011 Bulletin New York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association Vol. 54, No. 11 November, 2011 The Bulletin IRT OPERATED FREQUENT, DEPENDABLE SERVICE Published by the New 75 YEARS AGO York Division, Electric Railroaders’ Association, (Continued from September, 2011 issue) Incorporated, PO Box 3001, New York, New In the September issue, we were unable to the bottom or oil lamps red on the side which York 10008-3001. publish all the interesting information in the they are to take the switch. If they are to turn July 1, 1924 IRT subway rulebook because to the right to carry a red lamp on the right For general inquiries, of the lack of space. In this issue, we are still side of the head car, and if to take the switch contact us at nydiv@ printing excerpts from this book, which de- to the left, to carry a red light on the left side erausa.org or by phone scribes the duties of the Motormen and Con- of car. at (212) 986-4482 (voice mail available). The ductors operating the same cars that were in 213. Each Conductor and Rear Guard is Division’s website is service 75 years ago. required to carry on his train a white lantern www.erausa.org/ 82. The input of current to motors is gov- which must be kept lighted and ready for im- nydiv.html. erned automatically and automatic feed must mediate use. be used at all times when in proper working 228. The post of the Rear Guard is on the Editorial Staff: Editor-in-Chief: order. -
Waterbury Station
TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES IN SOUTHWESTERN CONNECTICUT KNOW HOW TO GO KNOW HOW TO GO KNOW HOW TO GO KNOW HOW TO GO KNOWfor HOW TO GOSENIORS, PEOPLE KNOW HOW TO GO WITH KNDISABILITIESOW HOW TO GO KNOW HOW TO GO and VETERANS www.knowhowtogoct.org Waterbury Station Naugatuck Station Beacon Falls Danbury Station Station Seymour Station Seymour Danbury Bethel Station Ansonia Station Ansonia Monroe Derby Shelton Redding Station Station Derby Redding Ridgefield Branchville Station Shelton Trumbull Milford Easton Cannondale Station Weston Bridgeport Wilton Wilton Station Milford New Merritt 7 Station Canaan Station Fairfield BridgeportStratford Station Stratford Station New Canaan Westport Station Fairfield Metro Station Fairfield Station Stamford Norwalk Southport Station Talmadge Hill SERVICE SERVICE AREA Station Green’s Farms Station Springdale Westport Station Station Darien E. Norwalk Station Glenbrook S. Norwalk Station Greenwich Station Rowayton Station Darien Station Noroton Heights Station Long Island Sound Stamford Station Old Greenwich Station Riverside Station Cos Cob Station Greenwich Station 1 Table of Contents Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Ferry ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................14 -
Comp Plan Supplement 5-16
Town of Greenburgh Comprehensive Plan 2016 SUPPLEMENT PROPOSAL HARTSDALE 4 CORNERS REVITALIZATION A DISCUSSION WITH THE TOWN OF GREENBURGH TOWN BOARD Work Session May 22, 2018 Patrice Ingrassia & Christine Broda Inspired Places LLC THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK Inspired Places LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 Materials and references ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Sources .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Background .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 The Comprehensive Plan Supplement ................................................................................................................. 3 Adopting a Comprehensive Plan Supplement .................................................................................................. 3 Revitalization is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan ................................................................................. 4 Relevant 4 Corners recommendations in the existing plan .......................................................................... 4 Recommended goals, objectives and policies to add to the Comprehensive Plan ............................. 6 4 Corners revitalization -
Transit-Oriented Development Study
Fairfield TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT STUDY AUGUST 2019 AUGUST 2019 Fairfield TOD Study CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 1 TOD Study Purpose ................................................................................................. 1 Two Station Areas and Contexts ............................................................................ 2 Critical Planning Questions and Answers ....................................................... 5 How much development of office space can we realistically expect in the station area in the near future? In the next five, ten, or twenty years? .............. 5 What is the market opportunity for multifamily housing? .................................. 6 How can we most effectively encourage high-value real estate development around Fairfield Metro? .......................................................................................... 7 If more multifamily housing were developed, what would be the potential positive or negative impacts, in terms of potential for office or other commercial development, Town finances, community character, infrastructure capacity, or other measures? ................................................................................. 7 Are there critical utility and transportation infrastructure thresholds that should inform the right land use mix and the amount