Chapter Will Address a Review of the Literature Most Relevant to This Study, Followed by by a Description of the General Methodology Applied in This Case Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter Will Address a Review of the Literature Most Relevant to This Study, Followed by by a Description of the General Methodology Applied in This Case Study Evaluating the impact of institutional factors and stakeholder capabilities on performance of decentralized water resources management regimes in Mozambique: the case of Limpopo river basin by Manuel Pedro Matsinhe Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc in Agricultural Economics Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences University of Pretoria South Africa February 2012 © University of Pretoria DECLARATION I, Manuel Pedro Matsinhe, hereby declare that the work presented in this dissertation is my own work and has never been submitted for any award in any other institution. Proper citation and referencing has been done where information from other sources has been used. Signature _____________________________ (Manuel Pedro Matsinhe) Date: _________________________________ i DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my sons Bruno Matsinhe and Cynthia Matsinhe, to my wife Natália Helena Magaua, and to my mother Halena Machava. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would have not been possible without the support of the Water Research Commission (WRC) in South Africa, and the International Centre for Water Economics and Governance in Africa (IWEGA) located at the Eduardo Mondlane University in Mozambique. I am indebted to African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) for funding my M.Sc. study at the University of Pretoria, and the Water Research Commission in South Africa (WRC), the World Bank, and the International Centre for Water Economics and Governance in Africa (IWEGA), for funding the research that produced this thesis. I would like to express special thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Eric Mungatana of CEEPA, University of Pretoria, for providing helpful suggestions to the study and consistently guiding and encouraging me during the course of writing this research thesis, and Dr. Emilio Tostão that have also provided some support to the study. To my lovely family, who played and continue to play a special role in my life, I say thank you iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................................. 4 1.4 IMPORTANCE AND BENEFITS OF THE STUDY .................................................................................... 4 1.5 ASSUMPTIONS ADOPTED IN THE STUDY ............................................................................................ 5 1.6 DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS ................................................................................................................... 5 1.7 ORGANISATION OF THE STUDY ............................................................................................................ 6 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ON DECENTRALIZATION AND ITS IMPACTS ON WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 7 2.1 ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER RESOURCES ................................................................ 7 2.2 DECENTRALIZATION OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 8 2.3 DECENTRALIZATION AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE ............................................................................ 10 2.3.1 Effects of prevailing conditions and contextual factors on the performance of the decentralization process .............................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2 Characteristics of the decentralization process on the performance of the decentralized process ..... 13 2.3.3 Recognition of basin communities of interest and incorporation of community level governance arrangements in the decentralization process .................................................................................................. 14 2.4 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS IN A DECENTRALISED RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT .......... 15 2.4.1 Basin-level institutional arrangements under decentralized basin management ................................. 17 2.4.1.1 Presence of basin-level governance institutions ......................................................................... 17 2.4.1.2 Mechanisms for conflict resolution and prevention and the collective action which facilitate basin management efforts ...................................................................................................................................... 18 iv 2.4.1.3 Characteristics of the water rights systems in place which facilitate or hinder basin management decentralization efforts .................................................................................................................................. 20 2.4.2 Central and local relationships and capacities ..................................................................................... 21 2.5 INCENTIVES AND ABILITIES OF STAKEHOLDERS TO PARTICIPATE IN A DECENTRALIZED RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 23 2.5.1 Determinants of stakeholder participation in a decentralized river basin management ...................... 24 2.5.2 Relationship between the style of leadership and the level of participation ........................................ 26 3 RESEARCH AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN, SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ................................................................................. 28 3.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 28 3.2 SURVEY INSTRUMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND BROAD RESEARCH DESIGN ............................. 28 3.2.1 Survey design ....................................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.2 Sampling .............................................................................................................................................. 29 3.3 DATA COLLECTION ............................................................................................................................... 30 3.3.1 Collection of primary data .................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.2 Collection of secondary data ................................................................................................................ 32 3.3.3 Challenges faced during data collection ............................................................................................. 33 3.4 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................... 33 3.5 DATA ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................... 36 3.6 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAMPLE INSTITUTIONS ....................................................................... 37 3.7 ASSESSING AND DEMONSTRATING THE QUALITY AND RIGOUR OF THE STUDY ...................... 38 3.8 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................ 39 3.9 STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................................... 41 3.9.1 Location and situation .......................................................................................................................... 41 3.9.2 Local conditions.................................................................................................................................... 42 3.9.2.1 Climatic conditions ....................................................................................................................... 42 3.9.2.2 Soils ............................................................................................................................................. 42 3.9.2.3 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................... 43 3.9.3 Social and economic characteristics .................................................................................................... 43 v 3.9.4 Floods and drought problems .............................................................................................................. 47 3.9.5 Water quality issues ............................................................................................................................. 48 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................................................ 51 4.1 INITIAL CONDITIONS AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DECENTRALIZATION PROCESS ....................................................................................................................... 51 4.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
Recommended publications
  • In Mozambique Melq Gomes
    January 2014 Tracking Adaptation and Measuring Development (TAMD) in Mozambique Melq Gomes Q3 Report - Feasibility Testing Phase MOZAMBIQUE TAMD FEASIBILITY STUDY QUARTER THREE REPORT, 10/01/2014 Contents INTRODUCTION 2 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS/KEY ENTRY POINTS 8 THEORY OF CHANGE ESTABLISHED 9 INDICATORS (TRACK 1 AND TRACK 2) AND METHODOLOGY 14 National level indicators 14 District level indicators 15 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 16 EMPIRICAL DATA COLLECTION (a) TRACK 1 (b) TRACK 2 16 CHALLENGES 17 CONCLUSIONS AND EMERGING LESSONS 17 ANNEXES 18 Annex 1: National level indicators 18 Annex 2: Guijá Field Work Report – Developing the ToC. 18 Annex 3: Draft of the workplan for Mozambique. 18 www.iied.org 1 MOZAMBIQUE TAMD FEASIBILITY STUDY QUARTER THREE REPORT, 10/01/2014 INTRODUCTION 1.1 - Mozambique Context Summary: Mozambique is the 8th most vulnerable country to climate change and is one of the poorest countries in the world with a high dependency on foreign aid. The population is primarily rural and dependent on agriculture, with 60% living on the coastline. Droughts, flooding and cyclones affect particular regions of the country and these are projected to increase in frequency and severity. The main institution for managing and coordinating climate change responses is the Ministry for Coordination of Environment Affairs (MICOA), the Ministry for Planning and Development also has a key role. New institutions have been proposed under the National Strategy on Climate Change but are not yet operational, it was approved in 2012. (Artur, Tellam 2012:8) Mozambique Climate Vulnerability and future project effects (Artur, Tellam 2012:9) Summary: The main risk/hazards in Mozambique are floods, droughts and cyclones with a very high level of current and future vulnerability in terms of exposure to floods and cyclones as more than 60% of the population lives along the coastline below 100 meters of altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Charcoal Supply Chains from Mabalane to Maputo: Who Benefits?
    Energy for Sustainable Development 33 (2016) 129–138 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy for Sustainable Development Charcoal supply chains from Mabalane to Maputo: Who benefits? Sophia Baumert a,⁎, Ana Catarina Luz b,JanetFisherc, Frank Vollmer c, Casey M. Ryan c, Genevieve Patenaude c, Pedro Zorrilla-Miras c,LuisArtura, Isilda Nhantumbo d, Duncan Macqueen d a Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Mozambique b cE3c – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal c The University of Edinburgh, UK d International Institute for Environment and Development, UK article info abstract Article history: In urban centres of Mozambique, charcoal is the major energy source for cooking. Growing demand drives high Received 14 November 2015 wood extraction rates over increasing areas of miombo and mopane woodlands. Charcoal production can lead to Revised 13 May 2016 changes in ecosystem service provision and woodland degradation while also significantly contributing to rural Accepted 8 June 2016 income and, possibly, poverty alleviation. As such, understanding charcoal production and trade has important Available online xxxx implications for rural areas and for the sustainable development of woodland resources. Here, we investigate charcoal production and trade through empirical research conducted in Gaza Province, the main charcoal supply Keywords: Value chain analysis area for Maputo, Mozambique. Mopane woodland We analyse the present structure of the main charcoal supply chains from Gaza province to Maputo and the profit Licencing system distribution along them. Seven villages in the Mabalane district, Gaza, at different stages of engagement with the Mozambique charcoal industry, were selected for investigation. We conducted household surveys and semi-structured inter- Forest law views with key informants (village leaders, charcoal producers, licence holders, wholesalers, transporters and Community-based natural resource forest technicians), from May to October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Projectos De Energias Renováveis Recursos Hídrico E Solar
    FUNDO DE ENERGIA Energia para todos para Energia CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFÓLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES Edition nd 2 2ª Edição July 2019 Julho de 2019 DO POVO DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS NM ISO 9001:2008 FUNDO DE ENERGIA CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFOLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES FICHA TÉCNICA COLOPHON Título Title Carteira de Projectos de Energias Renováveis - Recurso Renewable Energy Projects Portfolio - Hydro and Solar Hídrico e Solar Resources Redação Drafting Divisão de Estudos e Planificação Studies and Planning Division Coordenação Coordination Edson Uamusse Edson Uamusse Revisão Revision Filipe Mondlane Filipe Mondlane Impressão Printing Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Tiragem Print run 300 Exemplares 300 Copies Propriedade Property FUNAE – Fundo de Energia FUNAE – Energy Fund Publicação Publication 2ª Edição 2nd Edition Julho de 2019 July 2019 CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE RENEWABLE ENERGY ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS PROJECTS PORTFOLIO RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES PREFÁCIO PREFACE O acesso universal a energia em 2030 será uma realidade no País, Universal access to energy by 2030 will be reality in this country, mercê do “Programa Nacional de Energia para Todos” lançado por thanks to the “National Energy for All Program” launched by Sua Excia Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, Presidente da República de Moçam- His Excellency Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, President of the
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance Notes for Preparing Livelihood Zone Profiles
    LIVELIHOODS BASELINE PROFILES Limpopo Basin, Mozambique A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) May 2011 1 LIVELIHOODS BASELINE PROFILES Limpopo Basin, Mozambique A SPECIAL REPORT BY THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWORK (FEWS NET) May 2011 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 2 Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Sorghum Dominant Semi Arid Interior Livelihood Zone................................................................................ 5 Maize Dominant Semi-Arid Interior Livelihood Zone .................................................................................. 11 Upper Limpopo Riverine Chicualacuala/Mabalane Livelihood Zone .......................................................... 19 Upper Limpopo Massingir Riverine Livelihood Zone ................................................................................... 25 Lower Limpopo Baixa Non Irrigation Scheme Livelihood Zone ................................................................... 32 Lower Limpopo Baixa Irrigation Livelihood Zone ........................................................................................ 39 Lower Limpopo Alta Cassava Livelihood Zone ............................................................................................ 46 Lower
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Governance for a Changing Climate: Government, Communities
    ACCRA CASE STUDY JUNE 2017 ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE FOR A CHANGING CLIMATE Government, communities and others working collaboratively in Mozambique to transform climate adaptation planning systems Community members validating their local adaptation plan with district government officials and ACCRA team in Guija district, Mozambique. Photo: Thomas White In Mozambique, climate change has been increasing the vulnerability of rural and urban communities. Droughts, floods and cyclones are more frequent and severe, and sea- levels continue to rise – and the situation is likely to worsen. This has undermined the government’s efforts to achieve its goal of reducing extreme poverty. The approval of the new National Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategy (ENAMMC) in 2012 presented an important opportunity for ACCRA to advise the Government of Mozambique and ultimately to effect systemic and institutional change in planning for climate change adaptation. ACCRA also supported MITADER, which is responsible for operationalizing the strategy, with tools, resources and advice on processes. This story of change was developed following an external evaluation of ACCRA’s work in Mozambique, through a series of interviews and a learning history workshop held in October 2016 in Maputo. CONTENTS About ACCRA ............................................................................................................ 3 About this story of change ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 1 The context and key actors: mozambique
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Public Works, Housing and Water Resources
    SFG3872 Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS, HOUSING AND WATER RESOURCES NATIONAL DIRECTORATE FOR MANAGEMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Public Disclosure Authorized EMERGENCY RESILIENT RECOVERY PROJECT - ADDITIONAL FINANCING (ERRP - AF) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized July, 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized LIST OF ACRONYMS AIAS Water Supply and Sanitation Infrastructure Administration ARA Regional Water Administration DINOTER National Directorate of Territorial Planning and Resettlement DIPLAC-CEE National Directorate of Planning and Cooperation – School Construction and Equipment DNDR National Directorate of Rural Development DNFFB National Directorate of Forests and Fauna DNGRH National Directorate for the Management of Water Resources DPASA Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Food Security DPC Provincial Directorate of Culture DPOPHRH Provincial Directorate of Public Works, Housing and Water Resources DPS Provincial Directorate of Health DPTADER Provincial Directorate of Land, Environment and Rural Development DRM Disaster Risk Management DRR Disaster Risk Reduction EA Environmental Assessment EFP Environmental Focal Point EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EO Environmental Officer ERRP Emergency Resilient Recovery Project for the Northern and Central Regions ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESSP Education Sector
    [Show full text]
  • 1.3. Potential Small Scale Eco-Tourism in the Limpopo National Park - Support Zone Final Report
    MINISTÉRIO DO TURISMO DIRECÇÃO NACIONAL DAS ÁREAS DE CONSERVAÇÃO PARQUE NACIONAL DO LIMPOPO ESTUDO DO POTENCIAL DO USO DE TERRA E CAPACIDADE DE CARGA PARA A POPULAÇÃO DA ZONA DE APOIO DO PARQUE NACIONAL DO LIMPOPO EM MOÇAMBIQUE 1.3. Potential small scale Eco-tourism in the Limpopo National Park - Support Zone Final Report Maputo, 21 December 2012 Index Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 3 1. Executive summary ....................................................................................................... 5 2. Terms of reference ........................................................................................................ 6 3. Methodology of field study tour ................................................................................... 8 3.1. Tourism potential in the Limpopo National Park – support zone............................. 8 4. Introduction & Back ground ........................................................................................ 10 5. Findings & analysis ...................................................................................................... 11 5.1. Pafuri tourism traffic statistics 2008/9 - 2010 ......................................................... 11 5.2. Tourism projections for the Limpopo National Park ............................................... 12 5.3. General distances in relation to Limpopo National Park ......................................... 12 5.4. Tourism camping
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Mozambique: Food Insecurity
    Final Report Mozambique: Food Insecurity Emergency Appeal no MDRMZ012 GLIDE n° DR-2016-000142-MOZ Date of Issue: 22 September 2017 Date of disaster: January 2016 Operation manager (responsible for this EPoA): Point of contact: Lorraine Mangwiro, Head of Southern Africa CCST Ernestina Jama, Acting Secretary General Operation start date: 22 April 2016 Operation end date: 31 May 2017 Operation budget: CHF 1,702,895 Number of people assisted: 14,767 individuals (2,954 households) Host National Society: Mozambique Red Cross Society (CVM) has 159 staff members and 6,500 volunteers actively engaged on various programmes in 11 Provinces. For this operation: 11 staff and 197 volunteers were directly involved Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: IFRC, Spanish Red Cross, German Red Cross and Danish Red Cross Other partner organizations involved in the operation: The Department of Disaster Management (INGC), WFP, COSACA (a consortium of NGOs comprised by Concern Worldwide, Save the Children and CARE International), World Vision International and IOM A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster The El Niño conditions that persisted during the 2015/16 planting season caused the worst drought in 35 years in Southern Africa, resulting in a second consecutive failed harvest, thus reducing food availability by 15 per cent compared to the five-year average. In Mozambique, the food security and nutritional assessment of the Technical Secretariat for Food Security and Nutrition (SETSAN), released in September 2016, estimated that 1.5 million people were food insecure in seven provinces i.e. Maputo, Gaza, Inhambane, Tete, Manica, Sofala and Zambezia.
    [Show full text]
  • Appeal Coordinating Office
    150 route de Ferney, P.O. Box 2100 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Tel: 41 22 791 6033 Fax: 41 22 791 6506 e-mail: [email protected] Appeal Coordinating Office Mozambique Flood Relief Rehabilitation AFMZ-01 (Revision 3) Total Appeal Target : US$ 8,902,186 Balance Requested from ACT Network: US$ 555,155 Geneva, 20 July 2000 Dear Colleagues, The Lutheran World Federation (LWF/WS) Mozambique program are requesting for the revision of their component of the AFMZ01 appeal. The revision is based on review of activities initiated under the first appeal but based on needs assessments and consultations with the disaster victims, including participative rapid assessments in the Gaza and Sofala areas of operation. The activities in the revision will focus more on recovery and rehabilitation and will be targeting 457,500 beneficiaries through the end of the emergency program in February 2001. The sectors under coverage will include; · Food distribution · Infrastructure rehabilitation (public buildings, schools, rural roads, bridges) · Water – Well rehabilitation and Well drilling · Health and Sanitation · Food production · Shelter ACT is a worldwide network of churches and related agencies meeting human need through coordinated emergency response. The ACT Coordinating Office is based with the World Council of Churches (WCC) and the Lutheran World Federation (LWF) in Switzerland. Mozambique – Flood Relief & Rehabilitation 2 AFMZ-01 Revision 3 Summary of Appeal Targets, Pledges/Contributions Received and Balance Requested LWF CCM PCM Total in US$ Total Appeal Targets 6,163,762 2,207,964 530,460 8,902,186 Less: Pledges/Contr. Recd. 5,793,503 2,013,222 540,306 8,347,031 Balance Req.
    [Show full text]
  • RDUCROT Baseline Report Limpopo Mozambique
    LAND AND WATER GOVERNANCE AND PROPOOR MECHANISMS IN THE MOZAMBICAN PART OF THE LIMPOPO BASIN: BASELINE STUDY WORKING DOCUMENT DECEMBER 2011 Raphaëlle Ducrot Project : CPWF Limpopo Basin : Water Gouvernance 1 SOMMAIRE 1 THE FORMAL INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK 6 1.1 Territorial and administrative governance 6 1.1.1 Provincial level 6 1.1.2 District level 7 1.1.3 The Limpopo National Park 9 1.2 Land management 11 1.3 Traditional authorities 13 1.4 Water Governance framework 15 1.4.1 International Water Governance 15 1.4.2 Governance of Water Resources 17 a) Water management at national level 17 b) Local and decentralized water institutions 19 ARA 19 The Limpopo Basin Committee 20 Irrigated schemes 22 Water Users Association in Chokwé perimeter (WUA) 24 1.4.3 Governance of domestic water supply 25 a) Cities and peri-urban areas (Butterworth and O’Leary, 2009) 25 b) Rural areas 26 1.4.4 Local water institutions 28 1.4.5 Governance of risks and climate change 28 1.5 Official aid assistance and water 29 1.6 Coordination mechanisms 30 c) Planning and budgeting mechanisms in the water sector (Uandela, 2010) 30 d) Between government administration 31 e) Between donor and government 31 f) What coordination at decentralized level? 31 2 THE HYDROLOGICAL FUNCTIONING OF THE MOZAMBICAN PART OF THE LIMPOPO BASIN 33 2.1 Description of the basin 33 2.2 Water availability 34 2.2.1 Current uses (Van der Zaag, 2010) 34 2.2.2 Water availability 35 2.3 Water related risks in the basin 36 2.4 Other problems 36 2 3 WATER AND LIVELIHOODS IN THE LIMPOPO BASIN 37 3.1 a short historical review 37 3.2 Some relevant social and cultural aspects 40 3.3 Livelihoods in Limpopo basin 42 3.4 Gender aspects 45 3.5 Vulnerability to risks and resilience 46 3.5.1 Water hazards: one among many stressors.
    [Show full text]
  • ACES Newsletter Project Newsletter
    ACES Newsletter Project Newsletter Date: February 2015 Abrupt Changes in Ecosystem Services and Wellbeing in Mozambique (ACES) ACES NEWSLETTER | FEBRUARY 2015 Abrupt Changes in Ecosystem Services and Wellbeing in Mozambique (ACES) ACES Newsletter- Issue 1: February 2015 ACES is a three-year (2014 -2017) research project that is being implemented in Mozambique with the main purpose being to contribute to poverty alleviation in Mozambique by co-producing new knowledge of the dynamic links between land use change, Ecosystem Services (ES) and the wellbeing of the rural poor and thereby meet the demand from policy makers and practitioners for ways to better manage Mozambique’s woodlands (Dewees et al. 2008; Wiggins et al. 2012). The research sites include Gaza, Manica and Niassa Provinces, with research conducted on charcoal production, commercial agriculture and forest plantation land use change drivers in each site. The project is implemented by the University of Edinburgh (UoE) in partnership with the University Eduardo Mondlane (UEM) in Mozambique, the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), the University of Zimbabwe, the National Institute for Space Research (Brazil) and the Land University Centre for Sustainable Studies. ACES is implemented through five work packages (WPs) and the relationship between them is described in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project structure ACES’s website provides further information on the project: English at http://miomboaces.wordpress.com/ Portuguese at https://miomboacespt.wordpress.com/sobre/ www.iied.org 1 ACES NEWSLETTER ACES 1st year This first bulletin presents the achievements for each of the WPs for the first year of the project, outlines the next steps, and highlights innovations within the area of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspectos Críticos Da Governação Local Em Moçambique
    Aspectos Críticos da Governação Local em Moçambique: Um olhar sobre 6 Distritos e 3 Autarquias Bilene, Mabalane, Búzi, Cheringoma, Montepuez, Chiúre, Manjacaze, Marromeu, Mocímboa da Praia Ficha Técnica Título: Aspectos Críticos da Governação Local em Moçambique: um olhar sobre 6 distritos e 3 autarquias Coordenação Técnica: Centro de Integridade Pública Propriedade e Edição: Associação Moçambicana para o Desenvolvimento e Democracia (AMODE), Centro de Integridade Pública (CIP), Grupo Moçambicano da Dívida (GMD) e Liga dos Direitos Humanos (LDH). Layout: éDesign Capa: éDesign Impressão: CIEDIMA Tiragem: 500 exemplares Maio de 2009 ÍNDICE Conteúdo Pág. Abreviaturas.......................................................................................................... iv Lista de Gráficos................................................................................................... v Sumário Executivo ............................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary............................................................................................. 12 1. Introdução ....................................................................................................... 17 2. Enquadramento Institucional .......................................................................... 17 3. Metodologia..................................................................................................... 20 4. Apresentação dos Resultados por Distrito/Autarquia .......................................
    [Show full text]