DOCSLIB.ORG

Final EIS, Donlin Gold Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final EIS, Donlin Gold Project Donlin Gold Project Chapter 9: References Final Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 9: REFERENCES 33 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 325, Appendix B: NEPA Implementation Procedures for the Regulatory Program. Clean Water Act, Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Feb. 3, 1988. 3PPI (Three Parameters Plus, Inc.) and Resource Data, Inc. 2014. Section 404 Clean water Act and Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act Preliminary Permit Application Update Donlin Gold Project. November 2014. Prepared by Three Parameters Plus, Inc. and Resource Data, Inc. for Donlin Gold, Anchorage, Alaska. 2,451 pp. 3PPI, Barrick Gold Corporation, Resource Data, Inc., Naiad Aquatic Consultants, Coshow Environmental Inc. 2012. Preliminary Jurisdictional Wetland Determination Donlin Gold Project Southwest Alaska. Revision 0.0. Prepared by Three Parameters Plus, Inc. for Donlin Gold LLC, Anchorage, Alaska. 3PPI, Barrick Gold Corporation, Resource Data, Inc., Naiad Aquatic Consultants, and Coshow Environmental Inc. 2014. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Donlin Gold Project Southwest Alaska. April 2014. Revision 1.0. Prepared by Three Parameters Plus, Inc. for Donlin Gold LLC, Anchorage, Alaska. 3PPI. 2014a. Donlin Gold Project Vegetation Type Photo Signature Guide. Draft Report. January 2014. Prepared by Three Parameters Plus, Inc. for Donlin Gold, LLC. Anchorage, AK. 107 pp. 3PPI. 2014b. Draft Wetland Functional Assessment Donlin Gold Project. June 2014. Version 02, Revision 01. Prepared by Three Parameters Plus, Inc. for Donlin Gold, LLC. Anchorage, AK. 40 CFR 1502.14, Alternatives Including the Proposed Action. 40 CFR 230.10(a)(2), Restrictions on Discharge. 40 CFR 320.4(a), General Policies for Evaluating Permit Applications. ABR (ABR, Inc. Environmental Research and Services) and BPXA (BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.). 2013. Rehabilitation Report for Washington Creek (K8A) Trenching Test Site, Interior Alaska. Progress Report. March 15, 2013. USACE Permit #4-2001-1280, Washington Creek 2. Prepared by ABR, Inc. Environmental Research and Services and BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc., Anchorage, Alaska. 28pp. Abrahamson, M. 2012. Aleutians West Census Area. Alaska Economic Trends 32 (11):12-16. Abrahamson, M. 2013. The Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. Alaska Economic Trends 33 (10):4-7. ACCS (Alaska Center for Conservation Science). 2017a. Conservation datasets. Accessed January 15, 2017. http://accs.uaa.alaska.edu/conservation-data. ACCS. 2017b. Wildlife diversity program. Accessed January 15, 2017. http://accs.uaa.alaska.edu/zoology/wildlife-diversity. ACCS. 2017c. Animal range datasets. Accessed January 15, 2017. http://aknhp.uaa.alaska.edu/apps/biotics/. April 2018 Page| 9-1 Donlin Gold Project Chapter 9: References Final Environmental Impact Statement ACCS. 2017d. Wood frog range. Accessed January 15, 2017. http://accs.uaa.alaska.edu/files/zoology/amphibian_db/range/Wood_Frog_Range.jp g. ACCS. 2017e. Invasive and harmful species. Accessed January 15, 2017. http://accs.uaa.alaska.edu/invasive-species. ACCS. 2017f. Rare and sensitive plant list. Accessed January 15, 2017. http://aknhp.uaa.alaska.edu/apps/rareplants/. ACHP (Advisory Council on Historic Preservation). 2014. Programmatic Agreement on Protection of Historic Properties during Emergency Response under the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan. Accessed October 27, 2014. http://www.achp.gov/NCP-PA.html. Ackerman, JT, TE Kraus, JA Fleck, DP Krabbenholft, WR Horwath, SM Bachand, MP Herzog, CA Hartman, and PA Bachand. 2015. Experimental Dosing of Wetlands with Coagulants Removes Mercury from Surface Water and Decreases Mercury Bioaccumulation in Fish. Environ Sci Technol 49(10):6304-6311. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00655 Ackerman, NA. 2002. Effects of Vessel Wake Stranding of Juvenile Salmonids in the Lower Columbia River, 2002 – A Pilot Study. Prepared by SP Cramer & Associates, Inc., Sandy, Oregon, for the US Army Corps of Engineers, Portland District, Portland, Oregon. Ackerman, RA. 1996a. Lime Hills, Cave 1. Pages 456-460 in American Beginnings: The Prehistory and Paleoecology of Beringia. FH West, editor. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press. Ackerman, RA. 1996b. Spein Mountain. Pages 456-460 in American Beginnings. FH West, editor. Chicago, IL; University of Chicago Press. Ackerman, RA. 1996c. Nukluk Mountain. Pages 461-463 in American Beginnings: The Prehistory and Paleoecology of Beringia. FH West, editor. Chicago, IL; University of Chicago Press. Ackerman, RE, TD Hamilton, and R Stuckenrath. 1979. Early Culture Complexes on the Northern Northwest Coast. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 3:195:209. Acomb, L. 2011. Hydrocarbon Risk Calculator User Manual. January 4, 2011. Prepared by Lawrence Acomb, Geosphere, Inc. and CH2MHill. 143 pp. http://dec.alaska.gov/ spar/csp/guidance/hrc/HRC%20User%20Manual.pdf ACS (American Cancer Society). 2015. Website available at: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancerbasics/lifetime-probability-of-developing-or- dying-from-cancer. Accessed October 5, 2015. ADEC (Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation). 1999. Operational Draft Guidebook for Referenced Based Assessment of the Functions of Precipitation-Driven Wetlands on Discontinuous Permafrost in Interior Alaska. US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Technical Report Number: WRP-DE-1999. ADEC. 2000. Guidance for Cleanup of Petroleum Contaminated Sites. Division of Spill Prevention and Response, Contaminated Sites Remediation Program. September. 58 pp. April 2018 Page| 9-2 Donlin Gold Project Chapter 9: References Final Environmental Impact Statement ADEC. 2001. Alaska Regional Haze Strategy, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Air Non-point and Mobile Sources. November 7, 2001. Accessed October 25, 2013. http://dec.alaska.gov/air/anpms/doc-anpms/AKRH_strat.pdf ADEC. 2005. Policy Guidance on Developing Conceptual Site Models. Division of Spill Prevention and Response Contaminated Sites Program. November 30, 2005. Available at: https://dec.alaska.gov/spar/csp/guidance/csm05_draft.pdf ADEC. 2008a. Alaska Water Quality Criteria Manual for Toxic and Other Deleterious Organic and Inorganic Substances, as amended through December 12, 2008. ADEC. 2008b. Draft Summary Report of Improvements to the Alaska Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory. Juneau, AK. ADEC. 2008c. Cleanup Levels Guidance. Division of Spill Prevention And Response Contaminated Sites Program. June 9, 2008. Available at: https://dec.alaska.gov/spar/csp/guidance_forms/docs/cleanuplevels.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2015. ADEC. 2009. Internal Memorandum: Site Closure. ADEC Contaminated Sites Staff. July 24, 2009. ADEC. 2011a. Alaska Pollution Discharge Elimination System General Permit for Discharges from Large and Small Construction Activities (“Alaska Construction General Permit”). ADEC. 2011b. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Amendments to: State Air Quality Control Plan, Vol. II: Analysis of Problems, Control Actions, Section III.K: Areawide Pollutant Control Program for Regional Haze. February 11, 2011. ADEC. 2011c. Draft Risk Assessment Procedures manual. Updated and Recommended for Use. Division of Spill Prevention and Response, Contaminated Sites Program. November 2011. ADEC. 2012a. 18 AAC 75. Oil and Other Hazardous Substances Pollution Control. April 8, 2012. ADEC. 2012b. 18 AAC 78. Underground Storage Tanks. July 25, 2012. ADEC. 2012c. 18 AAC 80. Drinking Water. August 20, 2012. ADEC. 2012d. 18 AAC 70. Water Quality Standards, as amended through April 8, 2012. http://dec.alaska.gov/commish/regulations/pdfs/18%20AAC%2070.pdf. ADEC. 2013a. Contaminated Sites Program. Accessed November 11, 2013. http://dec.alaska.gov/spar/csp/db_search.htm. ADEC. 2013b. Contaminated Sites Program. Accessed November 2013. http://dec.alaska.gov/ Applications/SPAR/CCReports/Site_Report.aspx?Hazard_ID=487. ADEC. 2013c. GIS layers: C-M_Public_Water_System_Sources_SDWIS and EH_Drinking_Water_Protection_Areas. “Public Water System information has been provided by the Drinking Water Program of ADEC. The information provided is a snapshot as of October 21, 2013. There may be errors in source location information as well as other information.” ADEC. 2013d. Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQG). Technical Memorandum: Division of Spill Prevention and Response Contaminated Sites Program. January 2013. 4 pp. April 2018 Page| 9-3 Donlin Gold Project Chapter 9: References Final Environmental Impact Statement ADEC. 2013e. 18 AAC 50, Air Quality Control, as amended through October 6, 2013. ADEC. 2014. 18 AAC 75, Oil and Other Hazardous Substances, Pollution Control. https://dec.alaska.gov/commish/regulations/pdfs/18%20AAC%2075.pdf. ADEC. 2015a. 18 AAC 50, Air Quality Control, as amended through April 17, 2015. ADEC. 2015b. PERP Spills Database Search. Division of Spill Prevention and Response, Prevention and Emergency Response. Accessed September 28, 2015. http://dec.alaska.gov/Applications/SPAR/PublicMVC/PERP/SpillSearch ADEC. 2015c. Alaska Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Fact Sheet, Permit Number: AK0043206 – Hecla Greens Creek Mining Company. Effective October 1, 2015. ADEC. 2016. Alaska Best Management Practices – Construction of Non-Public Water Wells. Groundwater Protection Stakeholder Workgroup: Water Wells, June 6, 2016. ADEC. 2017a. ArcGIS - ADEC Drinking Water Internal Map. Accessed March 28, 2017. http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/print.html ADEC. 2017b. 18 AAC 75, Oil and Other Hazardous Substances, Pollution Control, as amended through July 1, 2017. http://dec.alaska.gov/commish/regulations/pdfs/18-aac-75.pdf
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NORTH ALEUTIAN BASIN ENERGY FISHERIES WORKSHOP March 19, 2007 Anchorage, Alaska
    NORTH ALEUTIAN BASIN ENERGY FISHERIES WORKSHOP March 19, 2007 Anchorage, Alaska 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 MR. ALLEE: Well, good morning, if you could 3 take your seats we'll get started with this morning's session. 4 It's going to be an exciting one all the way over to Norway and 5 we've got an interesting panel. 6 Just in terms of brief discussions this morning I'd 7 like to thank you for coming again and I thought yesterday's 8 session was really quite good. We got into some great issues 9 at the end of the day kind of talking about some of the things 10 that were concerning people, that's the sort of thing we want 11 to promote, so we're trying to promote dialogue and discussion 12 and that sort of thing. We're going to continue in that vein 13 today so, again, thanks so much for showing up this morning and 14 we'll get started here. 15 I'd like to introduce the moderator of the panel and 16 that is Jessica Shadian. She just recently got her Ph.D. in 17 Political Science and International Relations from the 18 University of Delaware and she's an associate professor at the 19 High North Center for Business at Bodo University in the 20 graduate school there for Business in Norway. So I would like 21 to introduce Jessica at this time. Jessica. 22 MS. SHADIAN: Thank you. I'm just briefly 23 going to say for one second a little bit about what my research 24 is going to be about because it's basically taking this 25 dialogue today and trying to bring it a step backwards and look 2 R & R COURT REPORTERS, 811 G STREET, ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 1 at it as part of, you know, a theoretical and from an academic 2 prospective because this dialogue is actually part of this 3 larger trend that's taking place in international development 4 and it's, you know, usually regarding natural resource 5 development.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Geyser Eruption Behavior and Remotely Triggered Seismicity in Yellowstone National Park Produced by the 2002 M 7.9 Denali Fault Earthquake, Alaska
    Changes in geyser eruption behavior and remotely triggered seismicity in Yellowstone National Park produced by the 2002 M 7.9 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska S. Husen* Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA R. Taylor National Park Service, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 82190, USA R.B. Smith Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA H. Healser National Park Service, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 82190, USA ABSTRACT STUDY AREA Following the 2002 M 7.9 Denali fault earthquake, clear changes in geyser activity and The Yellowstone volcanic field, Wyoming, a series of local earthquake swarms were observed in the Yellowstone National Park area, centered in Yellowstone National Park (here- despite the large distance of 3100 km from the epicenter. Several geysers altered their after called ‘‘Yellowstone’’), is one of the larg- eruption frequency within hours after the arrival of large-amplitude surface waves from est silicic volcanic systems in the world the Denali fault earthquake. In addition, earthquake swarms occurred close to major (Christiansen, 2001; Smith and Siegel, 2000). geyser basins. These swarms were unusual compared to past seismicity in that they oc- Three major caldera-forming eruptions oc- curred simultaneously at different geyser basins. We interpret these observations as being curred within the past 2 m.y., the most recent induced by dynamic stresses associated with the arrival of large-amplitude surface waves. 0.6 m.y. ago. The current Yellowstone caldera We suggest that in a hydrothermal system dynamic stresses can locally alter permeability spans 75 km by 45 km (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Race to Seismic Safety Protecting California’S Transportation System
    THE RACE TO SEISMIC SAFETY PROTECTING CALIFORNIA’S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Submitted to the Director, California Department of Transportation by the Caltrans Seismic Advisory Board Joseph Penzien, Chairman December 2003 The Board of Inquiry has identified three essential challenges that must be addressed by the citizens of California, if they expect a future adequately safe from earthquakes: 1. Ensure that earthquake risks posed by new construction are acceptable. 2. Identify and correct unacceptable seismic safety conditions in existing structures. 3. Develop and implement actions that foster the rapid, effective, and economic response to and recovery from damaging earthquakes. Competing Against Time Governor’s Board of Inquiry on the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake It is the policy of the State of California that seismic safety shall be given priority consideration in the allo- cation of resources for transportation construction projects, and in the design and construction of all state structures, including transportation structures and public buildings. Governor George Deukmejian Executive Order D-86-90, June 2, 1990 The safety of every Californian, as well as the economy of our state, dictates that our highway system be seismically sound. That is why I have assigned top priority to seismic retrofit projects ahead of all other highway spending. Governor Pete Wilson Remarks on opening of the repaired Santa Monica Freeway damaged in the 1994 Northridge earthquake, April 11, 1994 The Seismic Advisory Board believes that the issues of seismic safety and performance of the state’s bridges require Legislative direction that is not subject to administrative change. The risk is not in doubt. Engineering, common sense, and knowledge from prior earthquakes tells us that the consequences of the 1989 and 1994 earthquakes, as devastating as they were, were small when compared to what is likely when a large earthquake strikes directly under an urban area, not at its periphery.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Mazama: Explosion Versus Collapse
    Mount Mazama: Explosion versus Collapse WARREN D. SMITH, Ph.D. Professor of Geology University of Oregon CARL R. SWAR TZLOW, Ph.D. Park N aturalist Lassen National Park [Reprint from Bulletin of Geological Society of America. Vol. XLVII , December 1936. ] .. (. I I University of O regon EUGENE BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 47, PP. 1809-taso. 6 PLS., s FIGS. DECEMBER 31, 1936 MOUNT MAZAMA: EXPLOSION VERSUS COLLAPSE ~y WARREN D. SMITH AND CARL R. SWARTZLOW CONTENTS -Page Introduction ..................................................... •.:..... • 1809 Distribution, character, and amount of erupted material ..•.......• ·• . • . • . • . • 1812 Dillcr's "bn.ckflow" in Clcctwood Cove. • • . • . • • . • .. • . • • • . • • . .. • 1816 Shape nnd character of the crater. • . • . • . • • . • . • . • • • • . • . 1817 Absence of extruded lava of recent date. • . • • • . • . • • • • . • • . 1821 UNIVERSITY OF OREGON MONOGRAPHS· I\1nterinls of the rim . • . • • . • . • . • . • • • • • . 1822 · l\1cchanics of coJiapse. • • . • • • • . • . • • • • . 1824 Studies in Geology and Geography Records of some Pacific rim volcanoes .......•••••••... ·. • • • . • • . • • . • 1827 No; 1. February 1937 Summary and conclusions ........•.......•..•..••••.•.....•....•.•..•..•.• 1820 Published by' the University of Oregon Oregon State System of Higher ·· ILLUSTRATIONS Education, Eugene, Oregon Figure Pago I. Cross section of Crater Lake ............•••...•••••.....•••...••.••. : .. 1810 2. Pumice areas. • • • • . • . • . • . 1813 3. Section in Wheeler
    [Show full text]
  • CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS to AIRPORTS (Pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing by State, City and Airport
    CARES ACT GRANT AMOUNTS TO AIRPORTS (pursuant to Paragraphs 2-4) Detailed Listing By State, City And Airport State City Airport Name LOC_ID Grand Totals AK Alaskan Consolidated Airports Multiple [individual airports listed separately] AKAP $16,855,355 AK Adak (Naval) Station/Mitchell Field Adak ADK $30,000 AK Akhiok Akhiok AKK $20,000 AK Akiachak Akiachak Z13 $30,000 AK Akiak Akiak AKI $30,000 AK Akutan Akutan 7AK $20,000 AK Akutan Akutan KQA $20,000 AK Alakanuk Alakanuk AUK $30,000 AK Allakaket Allakaket 6A8 $20,000 AK Ambler Ambler AFM $30,000 AK Anaktuvuk Pass Anaktuvuk Pass AKP $30,000 AK Anchorage Lake Hood LHD $1,053,070 AK Anchorage Merrill Field MRI $17,898,468 AK Anchorage Ted Stevens Anchorage International ANC $26,376,060 AK Anchorage (Borough) Goose Bay Z40 $1,000 AK Angoon Angoon AGN $20,000 AK Aniak Aniak ANI $1,052,884 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Togiak TOG $20,000 AK Aniak (Census Subarea) Twin Hills A63 $20,000 AK Anvik Anvik ANV $20,000 AK Arctic Village Arctic Village ARC $20,000 AK Atka Atka AKA $20,000 AK Atmautluak Atmautluak 4A2 $30,000 AK Atqasuk Atqasuk Edward Burnell Sr Memorial ATK $20,000 AK Barrow Wiley Post-Will Rogers Memorial BRW $1,191,121 AK Barrow (County) Wainwright AWI $30,000 AK Beaver Beaver WBQ $20,000 AK Bethel Bethel BET $2,271,355 AK Bettles Bettles BTT $20,000 AK Big Lake Big Lake BGQ $30,000 AK Birch Creek Birch Creek Z91 $20,000 AK Birchwood Birchwood BCV $30,000 AK Boundary Boundary BYA $20,000 AK Brevig Mission Brevig Mission KTS $30,000 AK Bristol Bay (Borough) Aleknagik /New 5A8 $20,000 AK
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Oil Pipeline Natech Accidents and Recommendations for Natech Scenario Development
    Lessons learned from oil pipeline natech accidents and recommendations for natech scenario development Final Report Serkan Girgin, Elisabeth Krausmann 2015 Report EUR 26913 EN European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen Contact information Elisabeth Krausmann Address: Joint Research Centre, Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy E-mail: [email protected] https://ec.europa.eu/jrc Legal Notice This publication is a Science and Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Image credits: Trans-Alaska Pipeline on slider supports at the Denali Fault crossing: ©T Dawson, USGS JRC92700 EUR 26913 EN ISBN 978-92-79-43970-4 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2788/20737 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Abstract Natural hazards can impact oil transmission pipelines with potentially adverse consequences on the population and the environment. They can also cause significant economic impacts to pipeline operators. Currently, there is only limited historical information available on the dynamics of natural hazard impact on pipelines and Action A6 of the EPCIP 2012 Programme aimed at shedding light on this issue. This report presents the findings of the second year of the study that focused on the analysis of onshore hazardous liquid transmission pipeline natechs, with special emphasis on natural hazard impact and damage modes, incident consequences, and lessons learned for scenario building.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title An Improved Framework for the Analysis and Dissemination of Seismic Site Characterization Data at Varying Resolutions Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p35w167 Author Ahdi, Sean Kamran Publication Date 2018 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p35w167#supplemental Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles An Improved Framework for the Analysis and Dissemination of Seismic Site Characterization Data at Varying Resolutions A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering by Sean Kamran Ahdi 2018 © Copyright by Sean Kamran Ahdi 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION An Improved Framework for the Analysis and Dissemination of Seismic Site Characterization Data at Varying Resolutions by Sean Kamran Ahdi Doctor of Philosophy in Civil Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Jonathan Paul Stewart, Chair The most commonly used parameter for representing site conditions for ground motion studies is the time-averaged shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 m, or VS30. While it is preferred to compute VS30 from a directly measured shear-wave velocity (VS) profile using in situ geophysical methods, this information is not always available. One major application of VS30 is the development of ergodic site amplification models, for example as part of ground motion model (GMM) development projects, which require VS30 values for all sites. The first part of this dissertation (Chapters 2-4) addresses the development of proxy-based models for estimation of VS30 for application in subduction zone regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Geology and Seismology for Public Schools and Hospitals in California
    The Resources Agency California Geological Survey Michael Chrisman, Secretary for Resources Dr. John G. Parrish, State Geologist Engineering Geology and Seismology for Public Schools and Hospitals in California to accompany California Geological Survey Note 48 Checklist by Robert H. Sydnor, Senior Engineering Geologist California Geological Survey www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs July 1, 2005 316 pages Engineering Geology and Seismology performance–based analysis, diligent subsurface for Public Schools and Hospitals sampling, careful reading of the extensive geologic in California literature, thorough knowledge of the California Building Code, combined with competent professional geological work. by Robert H. Sydnor Engineering geology aspects of hospital and public California Geological Survey school sites include: regional geology, regional fault July 1, 2005 316 pages maps, site-specific geologic mapping, geologic cross- sections, active faulting, official zones of investigation Abstract for liquefaction and landslides, geotechnical laboratory The 446+ hospitals, 1,400+ skilled nursing facilities testing of samples, expansive soils, soluble sulfate ±9,221 public schools, and 109 community college evaluation for Type II or V Portland-cement selection, campuses in California are regulated under California and flooding. Code of Regulations, Title 24, California Building Code. Seismology aspects include: evaluation of historic These facilities are plan–checked by senior–level seismicity, probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Registered Structural Engineers within the Office of earthquake ground–motion, use of proper code terms Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) (Upper–Bound Earthquake ground–motion and Design– for hospitals and skilled nursing facilities, and the Basis ground–motion), classification of the geologic Division of the State Architect (DSA) for public schools, subgrade by shear–wave velocity to select the correct community colleges, and essential services buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Mapping and the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Using Geologic Maps to Protect Infrastructure and the Environment
    Case Study Geologic Mapping and the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Using geologic maps to protect infrastructure and the environment Overview The 800-mile-long Trans-Alaska Pipeline, which starts at examining the fault closely and analyzing its rate of Prudhoe Bay on Alaska’s North Slope, can carry 2 million movement, geologists determined that the area around barrels of oil per day south to the port of Valdez for export, the pipeline crossing—had the potential to generate a equal to roughly 10% of the daily consumption in the United very significant earthquake greater than magnitude 8. States in 2017. The pipeline crosses the Denali fault some 90 miles south of Fairbanks. A major earthquake along the fault could cause the pipeline to rupture, spilling crude oil into the surrounding environment. Denali Fault Trace In 2002, a magnitude 7.9 earthquake struck the Denali fault, one of the largest earthquakes ever recorded in North America, which caused violent shaking and large ground movement where the pipeline crossed the fault. However, the pipeline did not spill a drop of oil, and only saw a 3-day shutdown for inspections. Geologic mapping of the pipeline area prior to its construction allowed geologists and engineers to identify and plan for earthquake hazards in the pipeline design, which mitigated damage to pipeline infrastructure and helped prevent a potentially major oil spill during the 2002 earthquake. Geologic Mapping The Trans-Alaska Pipeline after the 2002 earthquake on the Denali Mapping the bedrock geology along the 1,000-mile-long fault. The fault rupture occurred between the second and third Denali fault revealed information on past movement on the beams fault and the likely direction of motion on the fault in future Image credit: Tim Dawson, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Names
    GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefaction Limits in Earthquake And
    Floods on Mars Released from Groundwater by Impact Chi-yuen Wang, Michael Manga and Alex Wong Department of Earth and Planetary Science University of California, Berkeley CA 94720 On earth, large earthquakes commonly cause saturated soils to liquefy and streamflow to increase. We suggest that meteoritic impacts on Mars may have repeatedly caused similar liquefaction to enable violent eruption of groundwater. The amount of erupted water may be comparable to that required to produce catastrophic floods and to form outflow channels. Key words: liquefaction, impacts, chaos 1. Introduction Liquefaction frequently occurs on Earth during or immediately after large earthquakes, when saturated soils lose their shear resistance, become fluid-like, and are ejected to the surface, causing lateral spreading of ground and foundering of engineered foundations (e.g., Terzaghi et al., 1996). During the 1964 Alaskan earthquake, for example, ejection of fluidized sediments occurred at distances more than 400 km from the epicenter (Waller, 1968). Increased streamflow is also commonly observed after earthquakes (Montgomery and Manga, 2003). Suggested causes include coseismic liquefaction (Manga et al., 2003), coseismic strain (Muir-Wood and King, 1993), enhanced permeability (Rojstaczer et al., 1995) and rupturing of hydrothermal reservoirs (Wang et al., 2004a). Extensive laboratory and field studies (e.g., Terzaghi et al., 1996) show that saturated soils liquefy during ground shaking as a result of pore-pressure buildup that in turn is due to the compaction of soils in an undrained condition. Furthermore, laboratory experiments (Dobry, 1985; Vucetic, 1994) showed that the threshold of pore-pressure buildup is insensitive to the type of soils (from clays to loose sand) and the environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Race to Seismic Safety Protecting California’S Transportation System
    THE RACE TO SEISMIC SAFETY PROTECTING CALIFORNIA’S TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Submitted to the Director, California Department of Transportation by the Caltrans Seismic Advisory Board Joseph Penzien, Chairman December 2003 The Board of Inquiry has identified three essential challenges that must be addressed by the citizens of California, if they expect a future adequately safe from earthquakes: 1. Ensure that earthquake risks posed by new construction are acceptable. 2. Identify and correct unacceptable seismic safety conditions in existing structures. 3. Develop and implement actions that foster the rapid, effective, and economic response to and recovery from damaging earthquakes. Competing Against Time Governor’s Board of Inquiry on the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake It is the policy of the State of California that seismic safety shall be given priority consideration in the allo- cation of resources for transportation construction projects, and in the design and construction of all state structures, including transportation structures and public buildings. Governor George Deukmejian Executive Order D-86-90, June 2, 1990 The safety of every Californian, as well as the economy of our state, dictates that our highway system be seismically sound. That is why I have assigned top priority to seismic retrofit projects ahead of all other highway spending. Governor Pete Wilson Remarks on opening of the repaired Santa Monica Freeway damaged in the 1994 Northridge earthquake, April 11, 1994 The Seismic Advisory Board believes that the issues of seismic safety and performance of the state’s bridges require Legislative direction that is not subject to administrative change. The risk is not in doubt. Engineering, common sense, and knowledge from prior earthquakes tells us that the consequences of the 1989 and 1994 earthquakes, as devastating as they were, were small when compared to what is likely when a large earthquake strikes directly under an urban area, not at its periphery.
    [Show full text]