DOCSLIB.ORG

ANU Strategic & Defence Studies Centre's Golden Anniversary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANU Strategic & Defence Studies Centre's Golden Anniversary New Directions in Strategic Thinking 2.0 ANU STRATEGIC & DEFENCE STUDIES CENTRE’S GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS New Directions in Strategic Thinking 2.0 ANU STRATEGIC & DEFENCE STUDIES CENTRE’S GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS EDITED BY DR RUSSELL W. GLENN Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760462222 ISBN (online): 9781760462239 WorldCat (print): 1042559418 WorldCat (online): 1042559355 DOI: 10.22459/NDST.07.2018 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press This edition © 2018 ANU Press Contents Foreword . vii Preface . xi Contributors . xiii Acronyms and abbreviations . xxiii 1 . Introduction . 1 Russell W . Glenn 2 . The decline of the classical model of military strategy . 9 Lawrence Freedman 3 . Economics and security . 23 Amy King 4 . A bias for action? The military as an element of national power . 37 John J . Frewen 5 . The prospects for a Great Power ‘grand bargain’ in East Asia . 51 Evelyn Goh 6 . Old wine in new bottles? The continued relevance of Cold War strategic concepts . 63 Robert Ayson 7 . Beyond ‘hangovers’: The new parameters of post–Cold War nuclear strategy . 77 Nicola Leveringhaus 8 . The return of geography . 91 Paul Dibb 9 . Strategic studies in practice: An Australian perspective . 105 Hugh White 10 . Strategic studies in practice: A South-East Asian perspective . 117 Peter Ho 11 . American grand strategy in the post–Cold War era . 133 Hal Brands 12 . The future of strategic studies: Lessons from the last ‘golden age’ . 149 Hew Strachan 13 . An Asian school of strategic studies? . 167 Amitav Acharya 14 . The future of strategic studies: The next golden age . 179 Robert O’Neill 15 . Conclusion: What is the future of strategic studies? . 193 Paul Dibb Appendix 1: Strategic & Defence Studies Centre 50th anniversary celebratory dinner keynote speech: ‘To see what is worth seeing’ . 207 Brendan Sargeant Appendix 2: Conference program . .. 215 Bibliography . 217 Foreword The 50th anniversary conference of the Strategic & Defence Studies Centre (SDSC), from which the essays in this volume are drawn, drew its inspiration from a similar event that Professors Robert O’Neill and David Horner hosted at The Australian National University in July 1980 under the theme ‘New Directions in Strategic Thinking’. There are some striking parallels between the period in which O’Neill and Horner held that conference—at the onset of the so-called second Cold War—and the world in which we find ourselves today. As Hedley Bull noted in his remarks to that earlier gathering: In the late 1960s and the first few years of the 1970s, it was widely held in the Western world that the role of force in international relations had gone into decline … A school of writers about international politics began to argue that the strategic factor in international power relationships was giving place to an economic factor … Today, rightly or wrongly, [those ideas] are in large part rejected. In the Western world there is now a widespread expectation that the role of force will not diminish but increase—an expectation that is borne out by the evidence of mounting arms and arms expenditures in the Soviet bloc, the Third World and the West itself.1 Fifty years after SDSC’s founding, geopolitics is making a comeback. The January 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America, for instance, boldly asserts that ‘interstate strategic competition, not terrorism, is now the primary concern in US national security’.2 Talk of an 1 Hedley Bull, ‘Force in international relations: The experience of the 1970s and prospects for the 1980s’, in New Directions in Strategic Thinking, ed. Robert O’Neill and D.M. Horner, George Allen & Unwin, London, 1981, p. 19. 2 US Department of Defense, Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge, Washington, DC, 2018, p. 1, www.defense.gov/ Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf (retrieved 28 January 2018). vii NEW DIRECTIONS IN Strategic THINKING 2 .0 emergent Asian arms race, spurred by North Korea’s burgeoning nuclear and missile capabilities, is becoming increasingly prevalent, and respected commentators regard the chances of war breaking out on the Korean Peninsula as being as high as 50 per cent. Scholars and practitioners alike, such as Harvard Professor Graham Allison and Chinese President Xi Jinping, have cautioned repeatedly on the dangers of China and the United States falling into a ‘Thucydides trap’ in a historical allusion to the strategic competition between Athens and Sparta 2,500 years ago, which tragically brought to an end a golden age in ancient Greece. Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who is equally fond of this historical analogy, has warned against taking the so-called Asian peace of recent decades for granted. As Turnbull observed in his keynote address to the June 2017 Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, ‘the gathering clouds of uncertainty and instability are signals for all of us to play more active roles in protecting and shaping the future of this region’.3 The need for high-quality strategic thinking is becoming increasingly urgent and apparent in the emerging landscape of international politics. Yet the world at large, and the Asia-Pacific region where much of this new era in strategic competition will be played out, is unfortunately starting from a lower-than-optimal base. That is because the fate of strategic studies is intimately and inevitably tied to its international political and security milieu. For instance, the first two decades following its birth as a formal field of study in the late 1940s have been characterised as a ‘golden age’ of strategic studies. The primary focus of scholars during this period was with a set of dilemmas associated with the onset of the nuclear era, including how use of these devastating new weapons could be avoided, or at least controlled and limited should war involving their use ever break out. In the radical political milieu of the late 1960s and early 1970s, however, strategic studies quickly fell out of fashion. The emergence of a strong anti-war sentiment in the United States rendered the study of such issues unfashionable and even distasteful. The so-called oil shocks of the 1970s shifted international focus more towards the potential use of economic 3 Malcolm Turnbull, ‘IISS Shangri-La Dialogue 2017 Keynote Address’, Singapore, 2 June 2017, p. 3. viii FOREWORD weapons and saw greater emphasis given to the economic dimensions of security. A period of détente between the United States and the Soviet Union, coupled with the normalisation of US–China relations, rendered the prospects for interstate conflict even more remote. As Bull’s remarks to the July 1980 SDSC conference suggest, the renewal of US–Soviet tensions in the 1980s challenged these assumptions for a time. Within a decade, however, the Cold War was over, and by the early 1990s the Soviet Union had evaporated. A swathe of articles appeared that questioned whether strategic studies should even survive in an era that the prominent international relations scholar Francis Fukuyama famously characterised as marking the ‘end of history’. Fifty years following SDSC’s founding, the question of whether strategic studies has any future is increasingly being answered resoundingly in the affirmative. Indeed, a strong case can be made that a new ‘golden age’ in the history of strategic studies is upon us. This is not only reflected in the significant expansion of the Centre that has occurred over the past half decade or so. It is also evident in the fact that new strategic studies programs are beginning to emerge throughout an Asia-Pacific region that in many respects has traditionally displayed an aversion towards studying use of force issues in any formal sense. Some might see this more crowded landscape as posing a threat to the future of SDSC. Instead, it should be regarded as presenting an enormous opportunity. Some SDSC scholars, such as the late Desmond Ball, played an important advisory role in the establishment of Singapore’s Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS). IDSS is now, of course, part of the world-leading S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies and continues to enjoy a close and productive relationship with the Centre. To be sure, as Amitav Acharya observes in his contribution to this volume, the provision of similar intellectual leadership, particularly regionally, during this next ‘golden age’ will need to be undertaken with a considerable degree of sensitivity. That said, it is an aspiration that SDSC should not shy away from. The excellent set of essays in this volume provide an impressive foundation from which to begin. Brendan Taylor Former Head of Centre (2011–16) Canberra, January 2018 ix Preface Twenty-five years before the conference recognised in these pages, The Australian National University’s Strategic & Defence Studies Centre (SDSC) marked its silver anniversary with a conference and resulting proceedings entitled New Directions in Strategic Thinking. SDSC marked the passage of another quarter century with a similar event graced by the offerings that follow: presentations by speakers from among the world’s most renowned thinkers in their fields. The following were fortunate in serving on the Centre’s faculty or staff in mid-2016: Joan Beaumont, John Blaxland, Jean Bou, Jack Bowers, Allison Cadzow, Andrew Carr, Aurore Chow, Rhys Crawley, Bel Curujo, Peter Dean, Stephan Fruehling, Robert (Bates) Gill, Russell Glenn, Chui Ling (Evelyn) Goh, Amy King, Tamara Leahy, Daniel Marston, Garth Pratten, Gregory Raymond, centre head Brendan Taylor, Helen Taylor, Joanne Wallis and Hugh White.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radical Islamist Groups in the Modern Age
    WORKING PAPER NO. 376 RADICAL ISLAMIST GROUPS IN THE MODERN AGE: A CASE STUDY OF HIZBULLAH Lieutenant-Colonel Rodger Shanahan Canberra June 2003 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Shanahan, Rodger, 1964-. Radical Islamist Groups in the Modern Age: A Case Study of Hizbullah Bibliography. ISBN 0 7315 5435 3. 1. Hizballah (Lebanon). 2. Islamic fundamentalism - Lebanon. 3. Islam and politics - Lebanon. 4. Terrorism - Religious aspects - Islam. I. Title. (Series : Working paper (Australian National University. Strategic and Defence Studies Centre) ; no.376). 322.42095692 Strategic and Defence Studies Centre The aim of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, which is located in the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies in the Australian National University, is to advance the study of strategic problems, especially those relating to the general region of Asia and the Pacific. The centre gives particular attention to Australia’s strategic neighbourhood of Southeast Asia and the Southwest Pacific. Participation in the centre’s activities is not limited to members of the university, but includes other interested professional, diplomatic and parliamentary groups. Research includes military, political, economic, scientific and technological aspects of strategic developments. Strategy, for the purpose of the centre, is defined in the broadest sense of embracing not only the control and application of military force, but also the peaceful settlement of disputes that could cause violence. This is the leading academic body in Australia specialising in these studies. Centre members give frequent lectures and seminars for other departments within the ANU and other universities and Australian service training institutions are heavily dependent upon SDSC assistance with the strategic studies sections of their courses.
    [Show full text]
  • On Strategy: a Primer Edited by Nathan K. Finney
    Cover design by Dale E. Cordes, Army University Press On Strategy: A Primer Edited by Nathan K. Finney Combat Studies Institute Press Fort Leavenworth, Kansas An imprint of The Army University Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Finney, Nathan K., editor. | U.S. Army Combined Arms Cen- ter, issuing body. Title: On strategy : a primer / edited by Nathan K. Finney. Other titles: On strategy (U.S. Army Combined Arms Center) Description: Fort Leavenworth, Kansas : Combat Studies Institute Press, US Army Combined Arms Center, 2020. | “An imprint of The Army University Press.” | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2020020512 (print) | LCCN 2020020513 (ebook) | ISBN 9781940804811 (paperback) | ISBN 9781940804811 (Adobe PDF) Subjects: LCSH: Strategy. | Strategy--History. Classification: LCC U162 .O5 2020 (print) | LCC U162 (ebook) | DDC 355.02--dc23 | SUDOC D 110.2:ST 8. LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020020512. LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020020513. 2020 Combat Studies Institute Press publications cover a wide variety of military topics. The views ex- pressed in this CSI Press publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Depart- ment of the Army or the Department of Defense. A full list of digital CSI Press publications is available at https://www.armyu- press.army.mil/Books/combat-studies-institute. The seal of the Combat Studies Institute authenticates this document as an of- ficial publication of the CSI Press. It is prohibited to use the CSI’s official seal on any republication without the express written permission of the director. Editors Diane R.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Strategic Culture and Constraints in Defence
    International Studies Association – Annual Convention 2013 Australia’s Strategic Culture and Constraints in Defence and National Security Policymaking Alex Burns, PhD Candidate, Monash University ([email protected]) Ben Eltham, PhD Candidate, University of Western Sydney ([email protected]) Abstract Scholars have advanced different conceptualisations of Australia’s strategic culture. Collectively, this work contends Australia is a ‘middle power’ nation with a realist defence policy, elite discourse, entrenched military services, and a regional focus. This paper contends that Australia’s strategic culture has unresolved tensions due to the lack of an overarching national security framework, and policymaking constraints at two interlocking levels: cultural worldviews and institutional design that affects strategy formulation and resource allocation. The cultural constraints include confusion over national security policy, the prevalence of neorealist strategic studies, the Defence Department’s dominant role in formulating strategic doctrines, and problematic experiences with Asian ‘regional engagement’ and the Pacific Islands. The institutional constraints include resourcing, inter-departmental coordination, a narrow approach to government white papers, and barriers to long-term strategic planning. In this paper, we examine possibilities for continuity and change, including the Gillard Government’s Asian Century White Paper, National Security Strategy and the forthcoming 2013 Defence White Paper. Introduction Digging Up Silos in Australia’s National Security Community On 23rd January 2013, the Gillard Government released Australia’s first National Security Strategy (NSS): Strong and Secure: A Strategy for Australia’s National Security.1 Amongst the NSS initiatives was a new Australian Cyber Security Centre that would coordinate Australian Federal Government expertise to combat cyber-attacks and cybercrime, provide cybersecurity and to strengthen the National Broadband Network’s rollout.
    [Show full text]
  • Geostrategy and Canadian Defence: from C.P. Stacey to a Twenty-First Century Arctic Threat Assessment
    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 20, ISSUE 1 Studies Geostrategy and Canadian Defence: From C.P. Stacey to a Twenty-First Century Arctic Threat Assessment Ryan Dean and P. Whitney Lackenbauer1 “If some countries have too much history, we have too much geography.” -- Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King, 1936 Geostrategy is the study of the importance of geography to strategy and military operations. Strategist Bernard Loo explains that “it is the influence of geography on tactical and operational elements of the strategic calculus that underpins, albeit subliminally, strategic calculations about the feasibility of the use of military force because the geographical conditions will influence policy-makers’ and strategic 1 An early version of some sections of this article appeared as “Geostrategical Approaches,” a research report for Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) project on the Assessment of Threats Against Canada submitted in 2015. We are grateful to the coordinators of that project, as well as to reviewers who provided feedback that has strengthened this article. Final research and writing was completed pursuant to a Department of National Defence MINDS Collaborative Network grant supporting the North American and Arctic Defence and Security Network (NAADSN). ©Centre of Military and Strategic Studies, 2019 ISSN : 1488-559X JOURNAL OF MILITARY AND STRATEGIC STUDIES planners’ perceptions of strategic vulnerabilities or opportunities.”2 By extension, the geographical size and location of a country are key determinants
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Colors, 2001-02: Prime Time Diversity Report. INSTITUTION Children Now, Oakland, CA
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 464 750 PS 030 374 AUTHOR Parker, McCrae A.; Miller, Patti; Espejo, Eileen; Grossman-Swenson, Sarah TITLE Fall Colors, 2001-02: Prime Time Diversity Report. INSTITUTION Children Now, Oakland, CA. SPONS AGENCY Mott (C.S.) Foundation, Flint, MI. PUB DATE 2002-04-00 NOTE 49p.; For Fall Colors II, see ED 444 707. Also supported by The Atlantic Philanthropies. AVAILABLE FROM Children Now, 1212 Broadway, 5th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612. Tel: 510-763-2444; Fax: 510-763-1974; e-mail: [email protected]. For full text: http://www.childrennow.org/media/fc2002/fc-2002-report.pdf. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Comparative Analysis; Content Analysis; *Cultural Pluralism; *Diversity (Institutional); Ethnicity; Mass Media Effects; *Programming (Broadcast); Racial Distribution; Television Research IDENTIFIERS Diversity (Groups) ABSTRACT Television is an integral part of American culture, and has the ability to play a major role in shaping belief systems, particularly for the youngest and most impressionable viewers. This study is the third annual study of diversity of characters in prime time television programming. The study examined the first two episodes of each prime time entertainment series airing on the six broadcast networks. The findings indicate that despite ongoing emphasis, encouragement, and pressure on the part of media advocates, civil rights groups, government officials, and even some entertainment industry leaders, the networks have yet to produce a prime time
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Violence: the German Army and Politics, 1918-1923
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-11 Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 Bucholtz, Matthew N Bucholtz, M. N. (2015). Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27638 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2451 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 By Matthew N. Bucholtz A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © Matthew Bucholtz 2015 Abstract November 1918 did not bring peace to Germany. Although the First World War was over, Germany began a new and violent chapter as an outbreak of civil war threatened to tear the country apart. The birth of the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government, did not begin smoothly as republican institutions failed to re-establish centralized political and military authority in the wake of the collapse of the imperial regime. Coupled with painful aftershocks from defeat in the Great War, the immediate postwar era had only one consistent force shaping and guiding political and cultural life: violence.
    [Show full text]
  • John Burton: Undermined by Dishonest History: Honest History Lecture Series, Manning Clark House, Canberra, Monday, 18 August 2014 Pamela Burton
    John Burton: undermined by dishonest history: Honest History lecture series, Manning Clark House, Canberra, Monday, 18 August 2014 Pamela Burton Dr John Burton headed the Department of External Affairs in 1947 at age 32, his minister being Herbert Vere Evatt (‘the Doc’). He and Evatt shared a joint vision for an Australian foreign policy independent of Britain and the United States. In his short public service career Burton had significant influence over Australia’s foreign policy. Ahead of his times, he held the view that Australia’s security in the Asia-Pacific region depended upon better understanding of and engagement with its neighbours. To achieve this, he advocated ‘open diplomacy’. Burton’s work and influence has been the subject of numerous scholarly works. Curiously, alongside the honest historians, there has been a concerted effort by some dishonest ideologues writing to discredit Burton and what he stood for. Sixty years on, malicious writers continue to skew the historic record by asserting that Burton betrayed his country. Why? And how can the record be corrected? I am a non-fiction writer. I would love to write fiction, but I’ve been told that it’s not my forte, because I can’t help letting truth get in the way of a good story. There are non-fiction writers, however, who won’t let the truth spoil a story. Take the example of a recent article in the magazine Quadrant, ‘The curious case of Dr John Burton’.1 A fictitious spy story if ever there was one, though it purported to be an historical account.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming
    Copyright © 2012 by Robert D. Kaplan Maps copyright © 2012 by David Lindroth, Inc. All rights reserved. Published in the United States by Random House, an imprint of The Random House Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York. RANDOM HOUSE and colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. The preface contains material from four earlier titles by Robert D. Kaplan: Soldiers of God (New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, 1990), An Empire Wilderness (New York: Random House, Inc., 1998), Eastward to Tartary (New York: Random House, Inc., 2000), and Hog Pilots, Blue Water Grunts (New York: Random House, Inc., 2007). LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Kaplan, Robert D. The revenge of geography : what the map tells us about coming conflicts and the battle against fate / by Robert D. Kaplan. p. cm. eISBN: 978-0-679-60483-9 1. Political geography. I. Title. JC319.K335 2012 320.1′2—dc23 2012000655 www.atrandom.com Title-spread image: © iStockphoto Jacket design: Greg Mollica Front-jacket illustrations (top to bottom): Gerardus Mercator, double hemisphere world map, 1587 (Bridgeman Art Library); Joan Blaeu, view of antique Thessaly, from the Atlas Maior, 1662 (Bridgeman Art Library); Robert Wilkinson, “A New and Correct Map v3.1_r1 But precisely because I expect little of the human condition, man’s periods of felicity, his partial progress, his efforts to begin over again and to continue, all seem to me like so many prodigies which nearly compensate for the monstrous mass of ills and defeats, of indifference and error. Catastrophe and ruin will come; disorder will triumph, but order will too, from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Waste in Your Community Managing Waste in Your Community – Education Kit
    Managing Waste in your Community Managing Waste in your Community – Education Kit This information kit has been adapted by the Southern Waste Strategy Authority from fact sheets developed by the Gould League in consultation with EcoRecycle Victoria. The kind permission of EcoRecycle Victoria is acknowledged in publishing this material. Contents Page 1. Introduction 2 2. How to Use the Package 2 3. Fact Sheets 3 3.1 Garbage 4 3.2 Recycling Snapshot 7 3.3 The 3 R’s – Reduce, Reuse & Recycle 11 3.4 Waste Tips 14 3.5 Paper Recycling 16 3.6 Plastic Recycling 19 3.7 Glass Recycling 23 3.8 Steel Can Recycling 25 3.9 Aluminium Recycling 27 3.10 Milk & Juice Carton Recycling 29 3.11 Home Composting 31 3.12 Resources 38 3.13 Key Contacts 40 4. Appendix 42 A. Managing Waste in your Community – Lesson Guide B. Managing Waste in your Community – Student Worksheet C. Managing Waste in your Community – Teacher Worksheet D. Managing Waste in your Community – Cue Cards Managing Waste in your Community – Education Kit ________________________________________________________________________ 1. Introduction What is the Southern Waste Strategy Authority? The SWSA is a Local Government Joint Authority, formed by the twelve southern Tasmanian councils, to implement a comprehensive waste management strategy throughout the region. Based on the widely recognised principles of 'Reduce, Reuse, Recycle', better known as the Waste Management Hierarchy, the strategy aims, amongst other things, to raise community awareness of, and participation in sound waste management practices. Schools can play an important role in this awareness and participation process, through the dissemination of information to students, who will in turn, spread the message into the home and greater community.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years of the Strategic and Defence Studies Centre
    A NATIONAL ASSET 50 YEARS OF THE STRATEGIC AND DEFENCE STUDIES CENTRE A NATIONAL ASSET 50 YEARS OF THE STRATEGIC AND DEFENCE STUDIES CENTRE EDITED BY DESMOND BALL AND ANDREW CARR Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: A national asset : 50 years of the Strategic & Defence Studies Centre (SDSC) / editors: Desmond Ball, Andrew Carr. ISBN: 9781760460563 (paperback) 9781760460570 (ebook) Subjects: Australian National University. Strategic and Defence Studies Centre--History. Military research--Australia--History. Other Creators/Contributors: Ball, Desmond, 1947- editor. Carr, Andrew, editor. Dewey Number: 355.070994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. This edition © 2016 ANU Press Contents About the Book . vii Contributors . ix Foreword: From 1966 to a Different Lens on Peacemaking . xi Preface . xv Acronyms and Abbreviations . xix List of Plates . xxi 1 . Strategic Thought and Security Preoccupations in Australia . 1 Coral Bell 2 . Strategic Studies in a Changing World . 17 T.B. Millar 3 . Strategic Studies in Australia . 39 J.D.B. Miller 4 . From Childhood to Maturity: The SDSC, 1972–82 . 49 Robert O’Neill 5 . Reflections on the SDSC’s Middle Decades . 73 Desmond Ball 6 . SDSC in the Nineties: A Difficult Transition . 101 Paul Dibb 7 .
    [Show full text]
  • 8.2009.Improving US China Relations Policy Memo.Indd
    Belfer Center for Science and International Aff airs John F. Kennedy School of Government • Harvard University August 2009 U.S.-China Relations Project Policy Memo Improving U.S.-China Relations: Th e Next Steps POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS • Allow China’s currency to float freely—floating upwards on the exchanges. • Transfer Chinese-owned debt to equity in the U.S. market. • Stop the Chinese practice of sterilizing incoming foreign exchange—allowing prices to rise and incomes in Chinese consumer hands to be spent. • Reach agreement on the size, geographical distribution, and purpose of Chinese and U.S. armed forces. By Richard Rosecrance, director of the U.S.-China abroad can now be consumed by an increasingly middle Relations Project at the Belfer Center, Harvard class nation at home. Th ese steps will bring China and Kennedy School the United States closer economically and increase international stability. However, unless the military- oth China and the United States are now security relations of the two countries improve, this emerging from the slumps of the 2008–2009 will not be a suffi cient remedy for the two nations’ long B“Great Recession.” But neither country has term problems. done much to address the imbalances that helped to precipitate the crisis. China has already succeeded with In 2009, a group of faculty members at the Belfer the stimulus of its own economy. Th e United States is Center at Harvard Kennedy School joined with the continuing to provide stimulus and also very low interest Chinese Academy of Social Sciences to produce Power rates. China’s success, however, means greater infl ation, and Restraint: A Shared Vision for the U.S.-Chinese which will have to be checked by higher interest rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Contents Establishing the Inquiry .................................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Inquiry ................................................................................................ 2 Support to the Inquiry Committee .............................................................................. 3 Avoiding conflicts of interest ...................................................................................... 4 The Inquiry’s approach ..................................................................................................... 5 Initial meetings ........................................................................................................... 5 Issues not addressed by the Inquiry .......................................................................... 6 Hearings .................................................................................................................... 8 Written evidence ........................................................................................................ 9 Publication of the most sensitive documents .................................................... 10 Minutes of Cabinet meetings ............................................................................. 11 Communication between the UK Prime Minister and US President .................. 12 Legal Professional Privilege and the Law Officers’ Convention ........................ 13 Open source material .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]