DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora and Fauna Survey Report R001 JBS&G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Planning Solutions Ocean Beach Telstra Phone Tower Lot 555 Ocean Beach Road Ocean Beach WA 10 February 2020 Flora and Fauna Survey Report R001 JBS&G Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Context .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Legislative context ............................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 EPBC Act ............................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 BC Act ................................................................................................... 3 2.1.3 EP Act ................................................................................................... 3 2.1.4 BAM Act ............................................................................................... 4 2.2 Other Legislation relevant to the MBS Site ......................................................... 4 2.2.1 Telecommunications Act ...................................................................... 4 3. Environmental setting ................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Soils and topography ........................................................................... 5 3.1.2 Climate ................................................................................................. 5 3.1.3 Hydrology ............................................................................................. 5 3.1.4 Conservation areas .............................................................................. 5 3.1.5 Land use ............................................................................................... 7 3.1.6 Regional vegetation ............................................................................. 7 4. Methods ......................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Desktop assessment ............................................................................................ 9 4.2 Field assessment .................................................................................................. 9 4.2.1 Flora and vegetation ............................................................................ 9 4.2.2 Fauna habitat ..................................................................................... 11 4.3 Survey limitations and constraints .................................................................... 11 5. Results .......................................................................................................................... 13 5.1 Desktop assessment .......................................................................................... 13 5.1.1 Threatened and Priority flora ............................................................ 13 5.1.2 Threatened and Priority Ecological Communities.............................. 13 5.1.3 Threatened fauna ............................................................................... 14 5.2 Field survey ........................................................................................................ 17 5.2.1 Flora and vegetation .......................................................................... 17 5.2.2 Fauna habitat ..................................................................................... 20 6. Discussion .................................................................................................................... 23 6.1 Flora and vegetation.......................................................................................... 23 6.2 Fauna and fauna habitat ................................................................................... 23 7. Summary and conclusion ............................................................................................. 24 8. References ................................................................................................................... 26 List of Tables Table 4.1: Database searches conducted for the desktop assessment ................................... 9 Table 4.2: Personnel ................................................................................................................ 9 Table 4.3: Vegetation condition scale for South West and Interzone Botanical Provinces (EPA 2016) ....................................................................................................... 10 Table 4.4: Flora, vegetation and fauna survey potential limitations and constraints ........... 11 Table 5.1: TEC/PEC identified within and near the Survey Area............................................ 14 Table 5.2: Vegetation types recorded within the Survey Area .............................................. 18 Table 5.3: Fauna Habitat types within the Survey Area ......................................................... 20 Table 8.1: Threatened and Priority flora species potentially occurring within the Survey Area ................................................................................................................. 32 Table 8.2: Threatened and Priority fauna species potentially occurring within the Survey Area ................................................................................................................. 34 Table C.1: Species recoded from quadrats ............................................................................ 39 List of Figures Figure 1.1: Survey Area ............................................................................................................ 2 Figure 3.1: Mean monthly climatic data (temperature and rainfall) for Ocean Beach ........... 5 Figure 3.2: Land systems mapping ........................................................................................... 6 Figure 3.3: Regional vegetation mapping ................................................................................ 8 Figure 5.1: Conservation significant flora .............................................................................. 16 Figure 5.2: Vegetation Types (VTs) mapped within the Survey Area .................................... 19 Figure 5.3: Fauna habitat types within the Survey Area ........................................................ 22 Appendices Appendix A Conservation significant flora and ecological community definitions Appendix B Desktop assessment results Appendix C Field Relevé data Appendix D Vascular plant taxa recorded from quadrats within the Survey Area ©JBS&G Australia Pty Ltd | Project/Document No. – Rev No. iii 1. Introduction This report presents the findings of a Reconnaissance flora and vegetation survey and fauna habitat survey undertaken for Planning Solutions. 1.1 Background Planning Solutions Pty Ltd (Planning Solutions) are currently preparing a Development Application (DA) on behalf of Telstra Corporation Pty Ltd to construction a Mobile Base Station on Lot 555 on Plan 071707 Ocean Beach Road, Ocean Beach, WA (MBS site). To support the DA, Planning Solutions have requested Strategen-JBS&G conduct a Reconnaissance flora and vegetation survey and fauna habitat survey within and immediately surrounding the proposed MBS site. The proposed works may impact native vegetation and as such, a flora, vegetation and fauna habitat survey was deemed necessary to determine the environmental values of the MBS site and the surrounding area (the Survey Area; Figure 1.1). A Survey Area of 0.19 ha was established which encompasses the MBS Site. 1.2 Scope The scope of this flora, vegetation and fauna habitat survey was to undertake a desktop and field assessment within the Survey Area identified in Figure 1.1. The objectives were to: • undertake a search of state and federal online databases to understand the potential conservation significant species present within 10 km of the Survey Area • request Department of Biodiversity, Conservations and Attractions (DBCA) database searches of known conservation significant flora and fauna species within 10 km of the Survey Area • carry out a single site visit to: o identity the flora species present within the Survey Area o map the vegetation types within the Survey Area o confirm the presence / absence of conservation significant flora species with the Survey Area – or if flowering timing does not allow confirmation, determine the likelihood of occurrence for conservation significant species o identify fauna habitat within the Survey Area to provide commentary on the presence / absence of conservation significant fauna • prepare a technical report based on the findings of the desktop and field surveys to support the DA. ©JBS&G Australia Pty Ltd | Flora and Fauna Survey Report R001 1 OVERVIEW MAP DENMARK ! Legend: Ocean Beach, WA Scale 1:2,500 at A4 02550 Survey area metres Cadastral boundary SURVEY AREA Coord. Sys. GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 Z Job No: 57535 Client: Planning Solutions FIGURE 1.1 Version: A Date: 11-Nov-2019 Drawn By: hsullivan Checked By: AH File Name: \\008PMPMR004V001.jbsg.aust\JBS Perth\Projects\1)Open\Planning Solutions\57535 - Ocean Beach Flora Survey\GIS\Maps\R01 Rev A\57535_01_1_SurveyArea.mxd
Recommended publications
  • Why Is Madagascar Special&#X0003f

    Why Is Madagascar Special?

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12578 Why is Madagascar special? The extraordinarily slow evolution of pelican spiders (Araneae, Archaeidae) Hannah M. Wood,1,2 Rosemary G. Gillespie,3 Charles E. Griswold,4 and Peter C. Wainwright1 1Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720 4Entomology Department, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California 94118 Received May 2, 2014 Accepted November 19, 2014 Although Madagascar is an ancient fragment of Gondwana, the majority of taxa studied thus far appear to have reached the island through dispersal from Cenozoic times. Ancient lineages may have experienced a different history compared to more recent Cenozoic arrivals, as such lineages would have encountered geoclimatic shifts over an extended time period. The motivation for this study was to unravel the signature of diversification in an ancient lineage by comparing an area known for major geoclimatic upheavals (Madagascar) versus other areas where the environment has been relatively stable. Archaeid spiders are an ancient paleoendemic group with unusual predatory behaviors and spectacular trophic morphology that likely have been on Madagascar since its isolation. We examined disparities between Madagascan archaeids and their non-Madagascan relatives regarding timing of divergence, rates of trait evolution, and distribution patterns. Results reveal an increased rate of adaptive trait diversification in Madagascan archaeids. Furthermore, geoclimatic events in Madagascar over long periods of time may have facilitated high species richness due to montane refugia and stability, rainforest refugia, and also ecogeographic shifts, allowing for the accumulation of adaptive traits.
  • HEXAPODA INSECTA Australia's Faunal Extinction Crisis Submission

    HEXAPODA INSECTA Australia's Faunal Extinction Crisis Submission

    SUPPORTING INFORMATION Table S3 Australian insects and allied invertebrates that have been listed under various conservation schedules, including State/Territory Acts, the EPBC Act and the IUCN Red List, and their occurrence in IBRA regions. Listed species Conservation status Conservation status Conservation status IBRA region (State) (various (EPBC Act 1999) (IUCN Red List 2017) State/Territory Acts) HEXAPODA INSECTA BLATTODEA Panesthia lata Walker, 1868, (Lord Howe Island Endangered PSI (NSW) Wood-feeding Cockroach) (Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016) COLEOPTERA Aulacopris matthewsi Storey, 1986 (Flightless Vulnerable WET (QLD) Dung Beetle) Castiarina insculpta (Carter, 1934) (Miena Jewel Endangered TCH (TAS) Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 Catadromus lacordairei Boisduval , 1835 (Green- Vulnerable FUR, TNM (TAS) lined Ground Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995) Enchymus sp. nov. Pascoe, 1871 (Weldborough Rare (Threatened BEL (TAS) Forest Weevil) Species Protection Act 1995) Goedetrechus mendumae Moore, 1972 (Ida Bay Vulnerable TSR (TAS) Cave Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995) Goedetrechus parallelus Moore, 1972 (Junee- Vulnerable TWE (TAS) Florentine Cave Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995) Hoplogonus bornemisszai Bartolozzi, 1996 Endangered Critically Endangered BEL (TAS) (Bornemissza’s Stag Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 – TAS) Hoplogonus simsoni Parry, 1875 (Simsons Stag Vulnerable Vulnerable BEL, TCH (TAS) Beetle) (Threatened Species Protection Act 1995) Hoplogonus
  • Systematic Revision of the Trans-Bassian Moriomorphine Genus

    Systematic Revision of the Trans-Bassian Moriomorphine Genus

    ZooKeys 1044: 339–373 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1044.62335 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Systematic revision of the trans-Bassian moriomorphine genus Theprisa Moore (Coleoptera, Carabidae) James K. Liebherr1, Nick Porch2, Matthew Shaw3, Bronte E. Sinclair4, David R. Maddison5 1 Department of Entomology, John H. and Anna B. Comstock Hall, 129 Garden Ave., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2601, USA 2 School of Life & Environmental Sciences & Centre for Integrated Ecology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3216, Australia 3 South Australian Museum, South Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia 4 Australian National Insect Collection, Building 101, Clunies Ross St., Black Mountain, ACT 2601, Australia 5 Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Corresponding author: James K. Liebherr ([email protected]) Academic editor: Thorsten Assmann | Received 21 December 2020 | Accepted 18 February 2021 | Published 16 June 2021 http://zoobank.org/8264C999-3201-4A3B-B39C-222790AC0192 Citation: Liebherr JK, N Porch, M Shaw, BE Sinclair, DR Maddison (2021) Systematic revision of the trans-Bassian moriomorphine genus Theprisa Moore (Coleoptera, Carabidae). In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JK, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940–2020). ZooKeys 1044: 339–373. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62335 Abstract The Australian genus Theprisa Moore, 1963, is taxonomically revised to comprise five species, two newly described: Theprisa darlingtoniLiebherr & Porch, sp. nov. of Tasmania, and Theprisa otway Liebherr, Porch & Maddison, sp. nov. from the Otway Ranges, Victoria. Two previously described species, T.
  • Checklist of Australian Spiders (Total of 3,935 Species in 677 Genera and 87 Families* by Volker W

    Checklist of Australian Spiders (Total of 3,935 Species in 677 Genera and 87 Families* by Volker W

    Checklist of Australian Spiders (total of 3,935 species in 677 genera and 87 families* by Volker W. Framenau Version 1.43: Saturday, 17 October 2020 For feedback and corrections please contact: [email protected] *The family Stenochilidae occurs in Australia (Framenau, Baehr, Zborowski 2014) but since no species have been published for this country, this family is currently not listed with any species below. this page: Araneomorphae Agelenidae Oramia Araneomorphae Agelenidae C. L. Koch, 1837 Modern Funnel-web Spiders Oramia Forster, 1964 frequens (Rainbow, 1920) Tegenaria Latreille, 1804 domestica (Clerck, 1758) Amaurobiidae Thorell, 1870 Mesh-web Weavers Dardurus Davies, 1976 agrestis Davies, 1976 nemoralis Davies, 1976 saltuosus Davies, 1976 silvaticus Davies, 1976 spinipes Davies, 1976 tamborinensis Davies, 1976 Daviesa Koçal & Kemal, 2008 gallonae (Davies, 1993) lubinae (Davies, 1993) Oztira Milledge, 2011 affinis (Hickman, 1981) aquilonaria (Davies, 1986) kroombiti Milledge, 2011 summa (Davies, 1986) Storenosoma Hogg, 1900 altum Davies, 1986 bifidum Milledge, 2011 bondi Milledge, 2011 forsteri Milledge, 2011 grayi Milledge, 2011 grossum Milledge, 2011 hoggi (Roewer, 1942) picadilly Milledge, 2011 smithae Milledge, 2011 supernum Davies, 1986 tasmaniensis Milledge, 2011 terraneum Davies, 1986 Page 1 of 100 this page: Araneomorphae Amaurobiidae Storenosoma victoria Milledge, 2011 Tasmabrochus Davies, 2002 cranstoni Davies, 2002 montanus Davies, 2002 turnerae Davies, 2002 Tasmarubrius Davies, 1998 hickmani Davies, 1998 milvinus
  • Uncovering a Secret World on the South Coast

    Uncovering a Secret World on the South Coast

    Page header?? UNCOVERING A SECRET WORLD ON THE SOUTH COAST Hiding beneath leaf litter and under rocks on the south coast lies a hidden world of spineless animals. Thanks to the tireless work of the South Coast Threatened Invertebrate Group we are getting a better picture of these amazing animals and how best to protect them. by Sarah Comer, Melinda Moir, Mark Harvey and Deon Utber LANDSCOPE 47 he south-west of Western published scientific literature each year Previous page Australia is recognised as one of 34 due to the many species requiring names Main Mark Harvey collecting invertebrates global biodiversity hotspots, and and the few taxonomists available to do at Middle Island off the south coast. T Photo – Sarah Comer/Parks and Wildlife while the flora and vertebrate fauna are the job. The term ‘Linnaean Shortfall’ Bottom The WA pill millipede (Cynotelopus relatively well described, the challenge of describes this bottleneck situation, but notabilis). documenting invertebrate diversity is one doesn’t help to identify which species that has kept the South Coast Threatened might require conservation. This is partly Above A female Zephyrarchaea mainae found Invertebrate Group (SCTIG) members achieved by conducting surveys and at Torndirrup National Park. Photos – Michael Rix/WA Museum busy for nearly 15 years. examining records to determine how restricted species actually are, where UNDERSTANDING THE they occur and, just as importantly, SPINELESS MAJORITY where they do not occur. This lack of To fully comprehend the challenges of knowledge on a species biogeography is Australia and Parks and Wildlife sought to invertebrate conservation it is important referred to as the ‘Wallacean Shortfall’.
  • 583–584 Angiosperms 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales

    583–584 Angiosperms 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales

    583 583 > 583–584 Angiosperms These schedules are extensively revised, having been prepared with little reference to earlier editions. 583 *Eudicots and Ceratophyllales Subdivisions are added for eudicots and Ceratophyllales together, for eudicots alone Class here angiosperms (flowering plants), core eudicots For monocots, basal angiosperms, Chloranthales, magnoliids, see 584 See Manual at 583–585 vs. 600; also at 583–584; also at 583 vs. 582.13 .176 98 Mangrove swamp ecology Number built according to instructions under 583–588 Class here comprehensive works on mangroves For mangroves of a specific order or family, see the order or family, e.g., mangroves of family Combretaceae 583.73 .2 *Ceratophyllales Class here Ceratophyllaceae Class here hornworts > 583.3–583.9 Eudicots Class comprehensive works in 583 .3 *Ranunculales, Sabiaceae, Proteales, Trochodendrales, Buxales .34 *Ranunculales Including Berberidaceae, Eupteleaceae, Menispermaceae, Ranunculaceae Including aconites, anemones, barberries, buttercups, Christmas roses, clematises, columbines, delphiniums, hellebores, larkspurs, lesser celandine, mandrake, mayapple, mayflower, monkshoods, moonseeds, wolfsbanes For Fumariaceae, Papaveraceae, Pteridophyllaceae, see 583.35 See also 583.9593 for mandrakes of family Solanaceae .35 *Fumariaceae, Papaveraceae, Pteridophyllaceae Including bleeding hearts, bloodroot, celandines, Dutchman’s breeches, fumitories, poppies See also 583.34 for lesser celandine .37 *Sabiaceae * *Add as instructed under 583–588 1 583 Dewey Decimal Classification
  • Science and Conservation Division Annual Research Report 2016–17 Acknowledgements

    Science and Conservation Division Annual Research Report 2016–17 Acknowledgements

    Department of Parks and Wildlife Science and Conservation Division annual research report 2016–17 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by Science and Conservation, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (formerly the Department of Parks and Wildlife). Photo credits listed as ‘DBCA’ throughout this report refer to the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. For more information contact: Executive Director, Science and Conservation Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions 17 Dick Perry Avenue Kensington Western Australia 6151 Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Western Australia 6983 Telephone (08) 9219 9943 dbca.wa.gov.au The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Parks and Wildlife, 2017, Science and Conservation Division Annual Research Report 2016–2017, Department of Parks and Wildlife, Perth. Images Front cover: Pilbara landscape. Photo – Steven Dillon/DBCA Inset: Burning tree. Photo - Stefan Doerr/Swansea University; Plant collecting. Photo – Juliet Wege/DBCA; Dibbler Photo – Mark Cowan/DBCA Back cover: Flatback turtle Photo – Liz Grant/DBCA Department of Parks and Wildlife Science and Conservation Division Annual Research Report 2016–2017 Director’s Message Through 2016-17 we continued to provide an effective science service to support the Department of Parks and Wildlife’s corporate goals of wildlife management, parks management, forest management and managed use of natural assets. In supporting these core functions, we delivered best practice science to inform conservation and management of our plants, animals and ecosystems, and to support effective management of our parks and reserves, delivery of our fire program and managed use of our natural resources, as well as generating science stories that inspire and engage people with our natural heritage.
  • Western Australia's Journal of Systematic

    Western Australia's Journal of Systematic

    WESTERN AUSTRALIA’S JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BOTANY ISSN 0085-4417 Hopper, S.D. & Wardell-Johnson, G. Eucalyptus virginea and E. relicta (Myrtaceae), two new rare forest trees from south-western Australia allied to E. lane-poolei, and a new phantom hybrid. Nuytsia 15(2): 227–240 (2004) All enquiries and manuscripts should be directed to: The Editor – NUYTSIA Western Australian Herbarium Telephone: +61 8 9334 0500 Conservation and Land Management Facsimile: +61 8 9334 0515 Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Email: [email protected] Western Australia 6983 Web: science.calm.wa.gov.au/nuytsia/ AUSTRALIA All material in this journal is copyright and may not be reproduced except with the written permission of the publishers. © Copyright Department of Conservation and Land Management . S.D.Nuytsia Hopper 15(2):227–240(2004) and G. Wardell-Johnson, Two new rare forest trees from south-western Australia 227 Eucalyptus virginea and E. relicta (Myrtaceae), two new rare forest trees from south-western Australia allied to E. lane-poolei, and a new phantom hybrid Stephen D. Hopper1 and Grant Wardell-Johnson2 1School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6907 2School of Natural and Rural Systems Management, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343 Abstract Hopper, S.D. & Wardell-Johnson, G. Eucalyptus virginea and E. relicta (Myrtaceae), two new rare forest trees from south-western Australia allied to E. lane-poolei, and a new phantom hybrid. Nuytsia 15(2): 227–240 (2004). Eucalyptus virginea and E. relicta are described from Mt Lindesay National Park and from the Whicher Range south-east of Busselton respectively.
  • Field Identification of the 50 Most Common Plant Families in Temperate Regions

    Field Identification of the 50 Most Common Plant Families in Temperate Regions

    Field identification of the 50 most common plant families in temperate regions (including agricultural, horticultural, and wild species) by Lena Struwe [email protected] © 2016, All rights reserved. Note: Listed characteristics are the most common characteristics; there might be exceptions in rare or tropical species. This compendium is available for free download without cost for non- commercial uses at http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~struwe/. The author welcomes updates and corrections. 1 Overall phylogeny – living land plants Bryophytes Mosses, liverworts, hornworts Lycophytes Clubmosses, etc. Ferns and Fern Allies Ferns, horsetails, moonworts, etc. Gymnosperms Conifers, pines, cycads and cedars, etc. Magnoliids Monocots Fabids Ranunculales Rosids Malvids Caryophyllales Ericales Lamiids The treatment for flowering plants follows the APG IV (2016) Campanulids classification. Not all branches are shown. © Lena Struwe 2016, All rights reserved. 2 Included families (alphabetical list): Amaranthaceae Geraniaceae Amaryllidaceae Iridaceae Anacardiaceae Juglandaceae Apiaceae Juncaceae Apocynaceae Lamiaceae Araceae Lauraceae Araliaceae Liliaceae Asphodelaceae Magnoliaceae Asteraceae Malvaceae Betulaceae Moraceae Boraginaceae Myrtaceae Brassicaceae Oleaceae Bromeliaceae Orchidaceae Cactaceae Orobanchaceae Campanulaceae Pinaceae Caprifoliaceae Plantaginaceae Caryophyllaceae Poaceae Convolvulaceae Polygonaceae Cucurbitaceae Ranunculaceae Cupressaceae Rosaceae Cyperaceae Rubiaceae Equisetaceae Rutaceae Ericaceae Salicaceae Euphorbiaceae Scrophulariaceae
  • Landcorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey

    Landcorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey

    LandCorp Denmark East Development Precinct Flora and Fauna Survey October 2016 Executive summary Introduction Through the Royalties for Regions “Growing our South” initiative, the Shire of Denmark has received funding to provide a second crossing of the Denmark River, to upgrade approximately 6.5 km of local roads and to support the delivery of an industrial estate adjacent to McIntosh Road. GHD Pty Ltd (GHD) was commissioned by LandCorp to undertake a biological assessment of the project survey area. The purpose of the assessment was to identify and describe flora, vegetation and fauna within the survey area. The outcomes of the assessment will be used in the environmental assessment and approvals process and will identify the possible need for, and scope of, further field investigations will inform environmental impact assessment of the road upgrades. The survey area is approximately 68.5 ha in area and includes a broad area of land between Scotsdale Road and the Denmark River and the road reserve and adjacent land along East River Road and McIntosh Road between the Denmark Mt Barker Road and South Western Highway. A 200 m section north and south along the Denmark Mt Barker Road from East River Road was also surveyed. The biological assessment involved a desktop review and three separate field surveys, including a winter flora and fauna survey, spring flora and fauna survey and spring nocturnal fauna survey. Fauna surveys also included the use of movement sensitive cameras in key locations. Key biological aspects The key biological aspects and constraints identified for the survey area are summarised in the following table.
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand

    Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand

    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
  • Banksia Road Dardanup Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey and Level 1 Fauna Assessment

    Banksia Road Dardanup Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey and Level 1 Fauna Assessment

    Banksia Road Dardanup Level 2 Flora and Vegetation Survey and Level 1 Fauna Assessment November 2014 Prepared for Transpacific Industries Group Ltd Astron Environmental Services 129 Royal Street East Perth WA 6004 Phone: (08) 9421 9600 Fax: (08) 9421 9699 Report Reference: 21135-14-BISR-1Rev1_151022 Email: [email protected] Banksia Road Dardanup Level 2 Vegetation and Flora Survey and Level 1 Fauna Assessment Prepared for Transpacific Industries Group Ltd Job Number: 21135-14 Reference: 21135-14-BISR-1Rev1_151022 Revision Status Rev Date Description Author(s) Reviewer M. Love N. Cadd A 08/12/2014 Draft Issued for Client Review V. Clarke J. Oates M. Love N. Cadd 0 02/10/2015 Final Issued for Information V. Clarke J. Oates Revised Final Issued for M. Love 1 22/10/2015 R. Archibald Information V. Clarke Approval Rev Date Issued to Authorised by Name Signature Transpacific Industries Group A 09/12/2014 S. Pearse (Cleanaway) Transpacific Industries Group 0 02/10/2015 S. Pearse (Cleanaway) Transpacific Industries Group 1 22/10/2015 S. Pearse (Cleanaway) © Copyright 2015 Astron Environmental Services Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. This document and information contained in it has been prepared by Astron Environmental Services under the terms and conditions of its contract with its client. The report is for the clients use only and may not be used, exploited, copied, duplicated or reproduced in any form or medium whatsoever without the prior written permission of Astron Environmental Services or its client. Transpacific Industries Group Ltd